DOCSLIB.ORG

The Worst Liberal Media Bias in 2018 Focused on Destroying Trump and Crushing Conservatives

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

TM Creating a Media Culture in America Where Truth and Liberty Flourish Vol. 26 • Issue 2 • February 2019 The Worst Liberal Media Bias in 2018 Focused on Destroying Trump and Crushing Conservatives The year 2018 was one of the worst The Washington Post’s Jennifer in terms of liberal media bias. The Rubin declared, “We’re not going to let MRC Headquarters • Reston, VA leftist press always attack conservatives these people go through life unscathed. while they are in office, as they did with Sarah Huckabee [Sanders] has no right Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and to live a life of no fuss, no muss, after INSIDE George W. Bush, but the relentlessly lying to the press…. These people vicious and hyperbolic attacks on should be made uncomfortable, and President Trump and I think that’s a life PAGE 3 his administration sentence frankly.” Brent Bozell Takes seem unprecedented. The Philadelphia the Liberal Media As the MRC has Inquirer’s Will Bunch to the Woodshed documented and complained the GOP exposed, the evening tax bill is “a terrible PAGE 4 news coverage of idea … if approved, BITS & PIECES: Trump by ABC, CBS, the worst law to be 70% Tax Praised, and NBC in 2018 was enacted on Capitol Good Morning Bashers, NBC Bans Climate Critics, 90% negative. That Hill since the Fugitive has a tremendous The liberal media have one goal: Slave Act of 1850.” Ethnically Pure, Destroy President Donald Trump and MSNBC: Trump’s Illiterate, impact given that 23 his administration. Republicans Hail Pelosi! million Americans who supported the watch the network news shows each tax cuts milled around Trump “like PAGE 6 night. It’s even worse when you include lemmings,” remarked MSNBC’s Chris Nationally Syndicated the hostile coverage at CNN, MSNBC, Matthews. “Like a North Korean Column by Brent Bozell NPR and other liberal outlets. parade…. [L]ike a scene out of Julius and Tim Graham: To illustrate that overwhelmingly Caeser…. [They] lined up to praise The Myth of the Media as Trump’s Accomplice negative coverage, MRC’s NewsBusters his eminence, the imperious Donald division prepared a Year in Review: Trump.” PAGE 7 Tracking the Media’s Hate for CNN’s Don Lemon railed, “We’re up MRC in the News Conservatives. Edited by Deputy against people who will lie, steal, and Research Director Geoff Dickens, the cheat, lie to their own mother, lie to PAGE 8 review presents some of the most themselves about what’s right for this obnoxious liberal bias of 2018. Let’s look country….” You Can Help Tomorrow’s Conservatives Through at some examples. The New York Time’s Bret Stephens the MRC Legacy Society! confessed, “I despise Ted Cruz. That Hating Conservatives is ‘D-e-s-p-i-s-e,’ in case I haven’t Minibits Concerning Vice President Mike spelled out my loathing clearly enough. Pence’s Christianity, ABC The View’s Because he’s like a serpent covered Joy Behar said, “It’s one thing to talk in Vaseline….[H]e makes Donald about Jesus. It’s another thing when Trump look like a human being by Jesus talks to you. That’s called mental comparison.” illness…. Hearing voices.” Continued on page 2 2 FEBRUARY 2019 Continued from page 1 Trump Derangement Liberal Heroes Syndrome (TDS) The leftist press clearly despises conservatives but Marred by TDS, MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough remarked, it can’t help but swoon over liberal lawmakers. “Whenever he [Trump] goes out there and whips Observing Rep. Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Chuck Schumer people up, it’s like a Mussolini rally. And yes, that’s meeting with Trump in the Oval Office, CNN’s Don what I said…. Threats follow, often death threats. Lemon gushed, “Oh my gosh, Nancy Pelosi is a boss!” Unfortunately, that’s exactly what he wants.” CNN’s official Twitter account blared, “Nancy Pelosi Trump is “a sort of junior player in a block of is the original Badass Woman of Washington.” authoritarian countries,” proclaimed the NYT’s MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell mused over Barack Michelle Goldberg, “kind of an Axis Power.” When Obama: A “very wise man and a brilliant writer…. MSNBC’s Katy Tur said Trump was not “rounding people [H]is mind is too supple, too complex, too rich up and murdering them,” Goldberg interjected, “He’d compared to my own….” certainly like to.” Politico’s Mark Perry actually compared Texas leftist After reading the definition of treason in Article III, Beto O’Rourke to Abraham Lincoln. “Like Lincoln, Section Three of the Constitution, CNN’s Don Lemon O’Rourke is charismatic, tall, lanky, filled with energy,” asked historian Douglas Brinkley, “Do you believe the crooned Perry, and “just like Lincoln, O’Rourke would president’s actions fall anywhere within that definition?” begin his quest for the presidency following a Senate MSNBC’s Anand Giridharadas declared, “We have a campaign that he actually lost.” man-child who is deranged and racist in this office.” CNN’s Van Jones wondered, “Does she [Oprah His comrade Joe Scarborough remarked, “Children Winfrey] want to be demoted from queen of the [migrants] are being marched away to showers, just universe to president of the United States? … She is like the Nazis said they were taking people to the probably the most beloved carbon-based life form on showers and then they never came back.” Earth. If she runs, she will destroy anybody in front of “He will be forever remembered as the president her.” who traumatized little children — that’s his brand now,” huffed Scarborough’s co-host Mika Brzezinski. Hooked on the Nazi theme, MSNBC’s Steve Schmidt said Trump’s rallies are “deeply un-American and, frankly, could be straight out of Munich circa 1928.” The NYT’s Michael Eric Dyson fumed, Trump “gets up every morning and excretes the feces of his moral depravity into a nation he has turned into a psychic commode…. [H]e’s a bigot-in-chief and a racist-in- residence.” Dyson’s Nobel Prize-winning colleague Paul Krugman charged, “Killing black people is an old American tradition, but it is experiencing a revival in the Trump era.” Is covering Trump “a form of national emergency?” fretted CNN’s ever-panicky Brian Stelter. “Are we living through a national emergency?” Not yet. But if you listened only to the liberal media, you’d think we were living in Berlin 1939. The leftist press are hysterical. The MRC is documenting and exposing that bias 24/7 through its six divisions: NewsBusters, MRCTV, MRC Business, MRC Culture, MRC Latino and CNSNews.com. You can help us in this daily battle by making a donation to our non-profit organization. Use the reply card and postage-paid envelope enclosed with this newsletter to send your most generous gift today. We look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, L. Brent Bozell III Founder and President FEBRUARY 2019 3 MRC President Brent Bozell Takes the Liberal Media to the Woodshed on FNC’s Life, Liberty & Levin On the Jan. 6, 2019 edition of Fox News Channel’s objectivity, all sense of fairness against the sky. He has Life, Liberty & Levin, hosted by conservative leader been on trial since day one and yet, there are no charges and best selling author Mark Levin, MRC President against him.” Brent Bozell discussed the treachery of the liberal LEVIN: “The media in the aggregate, why do you think it media, particularly their attacks on President is so liberal, progressive, statist?” Donald Trump and the frightening power of social media censorship. Presented below are some of the BOZELL: “The three power points of the left today are academia, the entertainment media and the news highlights from the show. media. Why? Because those are the three venues, the institutions where they can change society. They can use BOZELL: The liberal media “are consumed with hatred them to change society. They see their work that way.” for this man [Trump]. They despise him, personally, and I’ll put this in its correct perspective. When Reagan died, LEVIN: “Is CNN really a news network?” suddenly the media loved him all along and they treated him like they were his oldest friends, [and] they did do BOZELL: “No, they once were. … CNN is there to do a very good job on the funeral when Bush died recently. nothing but anti-Trumpism. … It’s so over-the-top, it’s so They were so classy in the way they covered his funeral. obvious what they’re doing. No, it’s not news anymore. When Donald Trump dies, the media’s reaction is going They don’t report news. How many news programs do to be why couldn’t he have died in 2015? This is to the they have on CNN? They are all talk shows.” degree to which they despise this man. BOZELL: Facebook, Twitter, Google, “absolute radicals “… [O]ne of the reasons they despise him is because he in all of these. On Twitter, you can’t use dead names declared war on them. There is an arrogance about the … the original name you had before you transgendered press that they believe in the people’s right to know into something else. So if you say Bruce Jenner, you’ll be about everything, except for them, that no one should knocked off Twitter. You’re not allowed to say Bruce Jen- ever, ever question them and Trump was the first one ner. It has gotten to be that bad. who declared war on them and it worked. “… This is not just censorship in the United States.
Recommended publications
  • Shafiq Rahman

    Shafiq Rahman

    Curriculum Vitae Shafiq Rahman Professor and Chair Communication & Social Sciences Department Chadron State College 1000 Main Street, Chadron NE 69337 Tel: 308-432-6327 (work) [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D. Mass Communication and Media Arts, December 2007 (Southern Illinois University, Carbondale). M.A. Communication, December 2001 (The University of Louisiana, Monroe). M.A. Mass Communication and Journalism, June 1992 (Dhaka University, Bangladesh). B.A. (Honors), Mass Communication and Journalism, June 1989 (Dhaka University, Bangladesh). EMPLOYMENT: UNITED STATES Professor (since August 16, 2015) and Chair, Department of Communication and Social Sciences at Chadron State College, August 2016—till date. Associate Professor, Communication and Social Sciences Department, Chadron State College, August 16, 2010—August 15, 2015. Assistant Professor, Communication and Social Sciences Department, Chadron State College, August 16, 2007—August 15, 2010. Instructor in record, School of Journalism, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, spring 2007(January— May). Teaching Assistant- School of Journalism, Southern Illinois University Carbondale (August 2003— December 2006). Research Assistant (quarter time), Aug. 2001- May 2001, and Aug. 2003-December 2006, School of Journalism, Southern Illinois University Carbondale. Research Assistant, Dept. of Mass Communications, The University of Louisiana Monroe, Aug 1999-May 2001. Shift Supervisor, Information Technology Computer Learning Center, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Aug 2001—May 2003. TEACHING I developed and taught a wide variety of classes in face-to-face and online formats. A significant part of teaching involves the instruction of graduate and undergraduate research methods and intercultural communication. I have also developed and taught media writing, media survey (introduction to media), communication theory, public speaking, persuasion, organization communication, and social media.
  • Periodicalspov.Pdf

    Periodicalspov.Pdf

    “Consider the Source” A Resource Guide to Liberal, Conservative and Nonpartisan Periodicals 30 East Lake Street ∙ Chicago, IL 60601 HWC Library – Room 501 312.553.5760 ver heard the saying “consider the source” in response to something that was questioned? Well, the same advice applies to what you read – consider the source. When conducting research, bear in mind that periodicals (journals, magazines, newspapers) may have varying points-of-view, biases, and/or E political leanings. Here are some questions to ask when considering using a periodical source: Is there a bias in the publication or is it non-partisan? Who is the sponsor (publisher or benefactor) of the publication? What is the agenda of the sponsor – to simply share information or to influence social or political change? Some publications have specific political perspectives and outright state what they are, as in Dissent Magazine (self-described as “a magazine of the left”) or National Review’s boost of, “we give you the right view and back it up.” Still, there are other publications that do not clearly state their political leanings; but over time have been deemed as left- or right-leaning based on such factors as the points- of-view of their opinion columnists, the make-up of their editorial staff, and/or their endorsements of politicians. Many newspapers fall into this rather opaque category. A good rule of thumb to use in determining whether a publication is liberal or conservative has been provided by Media Research Center’s L. Brent Bozell III: “if the paper never met a conservative cause it didn’t like, it’s conservative, and if it never met a liberal cause it didn’t like, it’s liberal.” Outlined in the following pages is an annotated listing of publications that have been categorized as conservative, liberal, non-partisan and religious.
  • Issue 1 January/February 2003

    Issue 1 January/February 2003

    VOLUME 8 ISSUE 1 JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2003 www.MediaResearch.org The Media Research Center’s Monthly Members’ Report The Liberal Media’s Double Standard INSIDE PAGE 3 screamed in an MSNBC.com piece on Limbaugh & Ingraham Dear Member, December 13. “Richard Nixon’s ‘Southern Cite the MRC Leftwing columnists and politicians, like Al Strategy’ set the poisonous tone, and Republican ■ Gore, have recently been complaining about a candidates continue to exploit racial fears for PAGE 3 nasty “conservative” bias in the media. Yes, the political gain.” Best NQ: A Big media are unfair, partisan and mean-spirited. NBC’s David Gregory repeated the claim on Hit With the Media They’re also liberal to the core. his network. “Since the days of ■ Nothing quite proves this Nixon, it’s been known as the PAGE 4 point like the contrasting ‘Southern Strategy,’ an appeal The Best Notable coverage of liberal and con- to frustrated Southern whites Quotables of 2002 servative politicians. And no opposed to civil rights gains,” ■ example better illustrates it than the correspondent chirped on PAGE 6 the coverage of recent com- December 23. “That strategy, Hogie Notes: ments by Senators Trent Lott perceived by some to be subtly CNSNews.com Radio: and Patty Murray. The contrasting coverage of racist, has been a big reason Ask For It! We have all heard about Sen. Trent Lott (R-Miss.) and why the GOP enjoys a political ■ Lott. He ignited a firestorm in Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) lock on the South.” PAGE 7 proved once again that the early December with his No evidence was required The MRC: comments about Strom Thur- media have different rules for to prove that Republican gains conservatives and liberals.
  • SAY NO to the LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES and CRITICISM of the NEWS MEDIA in the 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the Faculty

    SAY NO to the LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES and CRITICISM of the NEWS MEDIA in the 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the Faculty

    SAY NO TO THE LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES AND CRITICISM OF THE NEWS MEDIA IN THE 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Journalism, Indiana University June 2013 ii Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Doctoral Committee David Paul Nord, Ph.D. Mike Conway, Ph.D. Tony Fargo, Ph.D. Khalil Muhammad, Ph.D. May 10, 2013 iii Copyright © 2013 William Gillis iv Acknowledgments I would like to thank the helpful staff members at the Brigham Young University Harold B. Lee Library, the Detroit Public Library, Indiana University Libraries, the University of Kansas Kenneth Spencer Research Library, the University of Louisville Archives and Records Center, the University of Michigan Bentley Historical Library, the Wayne State University Walter P. Reuther Library, and the West Virginia State Archives and History Library. Since 2010 I have been employed as an editorial assistant at the Journal of American History, and I want to thank everyone at the Journal and the Organization of American Historians. I thank the following friends and colleagues: Jacob Groshek, Andrew J. Huebner, Michael Kapellas, Gerry Lanosga, J. Michael Lyons, Beth Marsh, Kevin Marsh, Eric Petenbrink, Sarah Rowley, and Cynthia Yaudes. I also thank the members of my dissertation committee: Mike Conway, Tony Fargo, and Khalil Muhammad. Simply put, my adviser and dissertation chair David Paul Nord has been great. Thanks, Dave. I would also like to thank my family, especially my parents, who have provided me with so much support in so many ways over the years.
  • The Civil War in the American Ruling Class

    The Civil War in the American Ruling Class

    tripleC 16(2): 857-881, 2018 http://www.triple-c.at The Civil War in the American Ruling Class Scott Timcke Department of Literary, Cultural and Communication Studies, The University of The West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago, [email protected] Abstract: American politics is at a decisive historical conjuncture, one that resembles Gramsci’s description of a Caesarian response to an organic crisis. The courts, as a lagging indicator, reveal this longstanding catastrophic equilibrium. Following an examination of class struggle ‘from above’, in this paper I trace how digital media instruments are used by different factions within the capitalist ruling class to capture and maintain the commanding heights of the American social structure. Using this hegemony, I argue that one can see the prospect of American Caesarism being institutionally entrenched via judicial appointments at the Supreme Court of the United States and other circuit courts. Keywords: Gramsci, Caesarism, ruling class, United States, hegemony Acknowledgement: Thanks are due to Rick Gruneau, Mariana Jarkova, Dylan Kerrigan, and Mark Smith for comments on an earlier draft. Thanks also go to the anonymous reviewers – the work has greatly improved because of their contributions. A version of this article was presented at the Local Entanglements of Global Inequalities conference, held at The University of The West Indies, St. Augustine in April 2018. 1. Introduction American politics is at a decisive historical juncture. Stalwarts in both the Democratic and the Republican Parties foresee the end of both parties. “I’m worried that I will be the last Republican president”, George W. Bush said as he recoiled at the actions of the Trump Administration (quoted in Baker 2017).
  • Journal of Media Law & Ethics

    Journal of Media Law & Ethics

    UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE SCHOOL OF LAW JOURNAL OF MEDIA LAW & ETHICS Editor ERIC B. EASTON, PROFESSOR EMERITUS University of Baltimore School of Law EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS BENJAMIN BENNETT-CARPENTER, Special Lecturer, Oakland Univ. (Michigan) STUART BROTMAN, Distinguished Professor of Media Management & Law, Univ. of Tennessee L. SUSAN CARTER, Professor Emeritus, Michigan State University ANTHONY FARGO, Associate Professor, Indiana University AMY GAJDA, Professor of Law, Tulane University STEVEN MICHAEL HALLOCK, Professor of Journalism, Point Park University MARTIN E. HALSTUK, Professor Emeritus, Pennsylvania State University CHRISTOPHER HANSON, Associate Professor, University of Maryland ELLIOT KING, Professor, Loyola University Maryland JANE KIRTLEY, Silha Professor of Media Ethics & Law, University of Minnesota NORMAN P. LEWIS, Associate Professor, University of Florida KAREN M. MARKIN, Dir. of Research Development, University of Rhode Island KIRSTEN MOGENSEN, Associate Professor, Roskilde University (Denmark) KATHLEEN K. OLSON, Professor, Lehigh University RICHARD J. PELTZ-STEELE, Chancellor Professor, Univ. of Mass. School of Law JAMES LYNN STEWART, Professor, Nicholls State University CHRISTOPHER R. TERRY, Assistant Professor, University of Minnesota DOREEN WEISENHAUS, Associate Professor, Northwestern University UB Journal of Media Law & Ethics, Vol. 8, No. 2 (Fall/Winter 2020) 1 Submissions The University of Baltimore Journal of Media Law & Ethics (ISSN1940-9389) is an on-line, peer- reviewed journal published quarterly by the University of Baltimore School of Law. JMLE seeks theoretical and analytical manuscripts that advance the understanding of media law and ethics in society. Submissions may have a legal, historical, or social science orientation, but must focus on media law or ethics. All theoretical perspectives are welcome. All manuscripts undergo blind peer review.
  • Online Media and the 2016 US Presidential Election

    Online Media and the 2016 US Presidential Election

    Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Faris, Robert M., Hal Roberts, Bruce Etling, Nikki Bourassa, Ethan Zuckerman, and Yochai Benkler. 2017. Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Paper. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33759251 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA AUGUST 2017 PARTISANSHIP, Robert Faris Hal Roberts PROPAGANDA, & Bruce Etling Nikki Bourassa DISINFORMATION Ethan Zuckerman Yochai Benkler Online Media & the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This paper is the result of months of effort and has only come to be as a result of the generous input of many people from the Berkman Klein Center and beyond. Jonas Kaiser and Paola Villarreal expanded our thinking around methods and interpretation. Brendan Roach provided excellent research assistance. Rebekah Heacock Jones helped get this research off the ground, and Justin Clark helped bring it home. We are grateful to Gretchen Weber, David Talbot, and Daniel Dennis Jones for their assistance in the production and publication of this study. This paper has also benefited from contributions of many outside the Berkman Klein community. The entire Media Cloud team at the Center for Civic Media at MIT’s Media Lab has been essential to this research.
  • 2018, in English and German

    2018, in English and German

    Tuesday, October 9, 2018 Wednesday, October 3, 2018 An article on Saturday about political fric- An article on Monday about a proposal tion between Ukraine and Hungary mis- by the Trump administration to weaken spelled the name of a Hungarian far-right regulations on mercury emissions referred group. It is Jobbik, not Jobbick. incorrectly to the initial estimate of direct health benefits from the mercury rule. The An article on Sunday about advice given to Obama administration estimated those Brett M. Kavanaugh by the White House benefits to be worth $6 million per year, counsel, Don McGahn, misstated when not $6 billion. Corrections and Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, had dinner with three A chart with an article on Feb. 13 about Republican senators who were undecided drinking water safety across the United on Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation. The States represented incorrectly the scale of dinner was Friday, September 28, not the y-axis. The chart shows violations of Thursday, September 27. water quality regulations per 10 water sys- tems in rural areas, not per 100 systems. An article on Sept. 30 about former N.F.L. ClarificationsKorrekturen, Berichtigungen, Klarstellungen, Gegendarstellungen cheerleaders speaking out about work- An article on Tuesday about widespread place harassment misstated the surname of delays affecting British train companies a lawyer representing several of the cheer- misidentified the organization that owns those that responded in full, a stun gun was An essay last Sunday about the effects of misstated the name of the unfinished novel leaders. She is Sara Blackwell, not Davis. the United Kingdom’s railroad infrastruc- fired 21 times, not 24.
  • Download the Full What Happened Collection [PDF]

    Download the Full What Happened Collection [PDF]

    American Compass December 2020 WHAT HAPPENED THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY IN REVIEW AMERICAN COMPASS is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, launched in May 2020 with a mission to restore an economic consensus that emphasizes the importance of family, community, and industry to the nation’s liberty and prosperity— REORIENTING POLITICAL FOCUS from growth for its own sake to widely shared economic development that sustains vital social institutions; SETTING A COURSE for a country in which families can achieve self-sufficiency, contribute productively to their communities, and prepare the next generation for the same; and HELPING POLICYMAKERS NAVIGATE the limitations that markets and government each face in promoting the general welfare and the nation’s security. www.americancompass.org [email protected] What Happened: The Trump Presidency in Review Table of Contents FOREWORD: THE WORK REMAINS President Trump told many important truths, but one also has to act by Daniel McCarthy 1 INTRODUCTION 4 TOO FEW OF THE PRESIDENT’S MEN An iconoclast’s administration will struggle to find personnel both experienced and aligned by Rachel Bovard 5 A POPULISM DEFERRED Trump’s transitional presidency lacked the vision and agenda necessary to let go of GOP orthodoxy by Julius Krein 11 THE POTPOURRI PRESIDENCY A decentralized and conflicted administration was uniquely inconsistent in its policy actions by Wells King 17 SOME LIKE IT HOT Unsustainable economic stimulus at an expansion’s peak, not tax cuts or tariffs, fueled the Trump boom by Oren Cass 23 Copyright © 2020 by American Compass, Inc. Electronic versions of these articles with hyperlinked references are available at www.americancompass.org.
  • THE NATIONAL ACADEMY of TELEVISION ARTS & SCIENCES ANNOUNCES NOMINATIONS for the 44Th ANNUAL DAYTIME EMMY® AWARDS

    THE NATIONAL ACADEMY of TELEVISION ARTS & SCIENCES ANNOUNCES NOMINATIONS for the 44Th ANNUAL DAYTIME EMMY® AWARDS

    THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF TELEVISION ARTS & SCIENCES ANNOUNCES NOMINATIONS FOR THE 44th ANNUAL DAYTIME EMMY® AWARDS Daytime Emmy Awards to be held on Sunday, April 30th Daytime Creative Arts Emmy® Awards Gala on Friday, April 28th New York – March 22nd, 2017 – The National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences (NATAS) today announced the nominees for the 44th Annual Daytime Emmy® Awards. The awards ceremony will be held at the Pasadena Civic Auditorium on Sunday, April 30th, 2017. The Daytime Creative Arts Emmy Awards will also be held at the Pasadena Civic Auditorium on Friday, April 28th, 2017. The 44th Annual Daytime Emmy Award Nominations were revealed today on the Emmy Award-winning show, “The Talk,” on CBS. “The National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences is excited to be presenting the 44th Annual Daytime Emmy Awards in the historic Pasadena Civic Auditorium,” said Bob Mauro, President, NATAS. “With an outstanding roster of nominees, we are looking forward to an extraordinary celebration honoring the craft and talent that represent the best of Daytime television.” “After receiving a record number of submissions, we are thrilled by this talented and gifted list of nominees that will be honored at this year’s Daytime Emmy Awards,” said David Michaels, SVP, Daytime Emmy Awards. “I am very excited that Michael Levitt is with us as Executive Producer, and that David Parks and I will be serving as Executive Producers as well. With the added grandeur of the Pasadena Civic Auditorium, it will be a spectacular gala that celebrates everything we love about Daytime television!” The Daytime Emmy Awards recognize outstanding achievement in all fields of daytime television production and are presented to individuals and programs broadcast from 2:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m.
  • Conservative Review

    Conservative Review

    Conservative Review Issue #185 Kukis Digests and Opines on this Week’s News and Views July 3, 2011 In this Issue: Additional Rush Links This Week’s Events Say What? Perma-Links Joe Biden Prophecy Watch Must-Watch Media Too much happened this week! Enjoy... A Little Comedy Relief Short Takes The cartoons come from: By the Numbers www.townhall.com/funnies. Polling by the Numbers If you receive this and you hate it and you don’t A Little Bias want to ever read it no matter what...that is fine; Obama-Speak email me back and you will be deleted from my Questions for Obama list (which is almost at the maximum anyway). Political Chess More Proof Obama is an Amateur Previous issues are listed and can be accessed News Before it Happens here: Missing Headlines http://kukis.org/page20.html (their contents are The Greedy Rich described and each issue is linked to) or here: Pinch Happened By Jed Babbin http://kukis.org/blog/ (this is the online directory Where the Tax Money Is they are in) Obama targets the middle class while pretending to tax only the rich. From the WSJ I attempt to post a new issue each Sunday by 5 or Is Democracy Viable? By Thomas Sowell 6 pm central standard time (I sometimes fail at July 4th By Thomas Sowell this attempt). I try to include factual material only, along with Links my opinions (it should be clear which is which). I Additional Sources make an attempt to include as much of this week’s news as I possibly can.
  • Johnny Isakson (R-Ga)

    Johnny Isakson (R-Ga)

    LEGISLATOR US Senator JOHNNY ISAKSON (R-GA) IN OFFICE CONTACT Up for re-election in 2016 Email Contact Form http://www.isakson.senate.gov/ 2nd Term public/index.cfm/email-me Re-elected in 2010 Web www.isakson.senate.gov/public SENIORITY RANK http://www.isakson.senate.gov/ 33 public Out of 100 Twitter @SenatorIsakson https://twitter.com/ SenatorIsakson DC 131 Russell Senate Office Office Building BGOV BIOGRAPHY By Eun Kim for Bloomberg News Johnny Isakson began his congressional career by assuming the seat vacated by Republican icon Newt Gingrich. Even so, the senior U.S. senator from Georgia continues to get his conservative bona fides questioned despite consistent support by fellow Republican office holders and his rise in the GOP ranks in the Senate. In the 114th Congress, he assumed the chairmanship of the Veterans Affairs Committee, and his committee portfolio also included seats on the Finance, Foreign Relations, and Health, Education, Labor and Pensions panels. He also retained his membership on the Ethics panel, where service helps a senator build a reputation as a team player. When he announced plans to launch his 2016 re-election campaign -- in November 2014 -- Isakson flanked himself with Georgia Governor Nathan Deal and other top party leaders from the state, which may provide some inoculation from critics such as the small-government, low-taxes Club for Growth and the Eagle Forum, which supports “conservative and pro- family men and women.” “I’m a known commodity in this state,” he declared at a news conference describing why he deserved a third term. “All you’ve got to do is Google my name and you can find out everything I’ve ever done -- and everything I haven’t ever done.” Just around the same time, the Conservative Review gave Isakson a failing 46 percent “liberty score.” The group also placed Isakson on its 2016 primary “hit list” of lawmakers it viewed as moderate.