Sixth International Conference on Mars (2003) alpha_bl-by.pdf
Contents — Bl through By
Determination of Net Martian Polar Dust Flux from MGS-TES Observations M. A. Blackmon and J. R. Murphy ...... 3167
In-Situ Dating on Mars: Procedures and Characterization of Luminescence from a Martian Soil Simulant and Martian Meteorites M. W. Blair, E. G. Yukihara, R. Kalchgruber, and S. W. S. McKeever ...... 3201
Definitive Mineralogical Analysis of Martian Rocks and Soil Using the CheMin XRD/XRF Instrument and the USDC Sampler D. F. Blake, P. Sarrazin, S. J. Chipera, D. L. Bish, D. T. Vaniman, Y. Bar-Cohen, S. Sherrit, S. Collins, B. Boyer, C. Bryson, and J. King ...... 3022
High Spectral Resolution Spectroscopy of Mars from 2 to 4 µm: Surface Mineralogy and the Atmosphere D. L. Blaney, D. A. Glenar, and G. L. Bjorker...... 3237
Modeling the Seasonal South Polar Cap Sublimation Rates at Dust Storm Conditions B. P. Bonev, P. B. James, M. J. Wolff, J. E. Bjorkman, G. B. Hansen, and J. L. Benson...... 3111
Depth-dependent Thermal Stress on a One-Plate Planet, Mars L. L. Boroughs and E. M. Parmentier ...... 3131
Mars Global Surveyor Radio Science Electron Density Profiles: Interannual Variability and Implications for the Neutral Atmosphere S. W. Bougher, S. Engel, D. P. Hinson, and J. R. Murphy ...... 3266
Aeolian Sediment Transport Pathways and Aerodynamics at Troughs on Mars M. C. Bourke, J. E. Bullard, and O. Barnouin-Jha ...... 3216
Evidence for a Thick, Discontinuous Mantle of Volatile-rich Materials in the Northern High-Latitudes of Mars Based on Crater Depth/Diameter Measurements J. M. Boyce, P. J. Mouginis-Mark, and H. Garbeil...... 3193
Abundance and Distribution of Ice in the Polar Regions of Mars: More Evidence for Wet Periods in the Recent Past W. V. Boynton, M. Chamberlain, W. C. Feldman, T. Prettyman, D. Hamara, D. Janes, K. Kerry, and the GRS Team...... 3259
Crustal Fields in the Solar Wind: Implications for Atmospheric Escape D. A. Brain ...... 3241
Mars as the Parent Body for the CI Carbonaceous Chondrites: Confirmation of Early Mars Biology J. E. Brandenburg ...... 3226
The New Mars Synthesis: A New Concept of Mars Geo-Chemical History J. E. Brandenburg ...... 3184
Effect of Solar Activity in Topside Ionosphere/Atmosphere of Mars: Mariner 9, Viking 1 and 2 and Mars Global Surveyor Observations T. K. Breus, D. H. Crider, A. M. Krymskii, N. F. Ness, and D. Hinson...... 3124
Sixth International Conference on Mars (2003) alpha_bl-by.pdf
Studies of Rock Abrasion on Earth and Mars N. T. Bridges, J. E. Laity, R. Greeley, J. Phoreman Jr., and E. E. Eddlemon...... 3235
Sample Analysis at Mars W. B. Brinckerhoff, P. R. Mahaffy, M. Cabane, S. K. Atreya, P. Coll, T. J. Cornish, D. N. Harpold, G. Israel, H. B. Niemann, T. Owen, and F. Raulin...... 3030
Emissivity Spectrum of a Large “Dark Streak” from THEMIS Infrared Imagery S. P. Brumby, D. T. Vaniman, and D. L. Bish ...... 3278
Utopia Planitia: Observations and Models Favoring Thick Water-deposited Sediments D. L. Buczkowski and G. E. McGill...... 3031
Implications of Flow and Brittle Fracture of Ice Masses in South Polar Craters S. Byrne ...... 3219
Martian Climactic Events Inferred from South Polar Geomorphology on Timescales of Centuries S. Byrne, A. P. Ingersoll, and A. V. Pathare...... 3112
Sixth International Conference on Mars (2003) 3167.pdf
DETERMINATION OF NET MARTIAN POLAR DUST FLUX FROM MGS-TES OBSERVATIONS. M. A. Blackmon1,* and J. R. Murphy1, 1Department of Astronomy, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003- 8001, USA. *E-mail address: [email protected] (M. A. Blackmon)
Introduction: Using atmospheric dust abundance temperature are derived from these spectra, at pressure and atmospheric temperature observation data from the levels ranging from the surface to ~40 km (0.02 mbars) Thermal Emission Spectrometer (TES) on board the at ~02:00 and ~14:00 local time [6]. Mars Global Surveyor (MGS), the net flux of dust into Methodology: This study uses the observed verti- and out of the Martian polar regions will be examined. cal temperature data and dust content measurements Mars’ polar regions possess “layered terrain”, believed from TES to analyze the sign (gain or loss) of dust at to be comprised of a mixture of ice and dust, with the high latitudes. The MGS-TES vertical temperature different layers possibly representing different past data can be analyzed in the same method as Santee & climate regimes [1-3]. These changes in climate may Crisp [4] to derive a transport circulation. They de- reflect changes in the deposition of dust and volatiles rived ‘transport’ circulation information from Mariner through impacts, volcanism, changes in resources of 9 IRIS atmospheric temperature and dust distribution ice and dust [1], and response to Milankovitch type data in a diagnostic stream function model. The dust cycles (changes in eccentricity of orbit, obliquity and column abundance can be derived from opacity meas- precession of axis) [9, 11-12]. Understanding how urements in 9 µm silicate band from TES and then in- rapidly such layers can be generated is an important put into a 1-dimensional radiative/convective transfer element to understanding Mars’ climate history. model to acquire a crude vertical distribution of the The TES instrument is an infrared spectrometer that dust. The calculated circulation and dust distribution observes a wavelength range of 6-50 µm. Vertical will be combined to quantify the net dust flux. temperature profiles derived from TES spectral data A comparison with [4] over the same season will be will be ingested into a 1-dimensional radia- made as a preliminary order of magnitude comparison. tive/convective transfer model of Mars’ atmosphere in Santee & Crisp [4] examined LS=343°-348°, and we order to “diagnose” the atmospheric circulation (winds) have data for the same time period with MGS-TES for that can transport dust vertically and in the North/South LS=343.4°-348.48°. After the preliminary comparison direction. An analysis method developed by Santee & of the circulation and dust distribution has been done Crisp [4] (for use with Mariner 9 IRIS data) will be and the results appear reasonable with [4], the analysis used to derive the circulation and its ability to transport will then be applied over MGS years 1 and 2. We will the suspended dust. The vertical distribution of the look at interannual variability for these two years, as dust will itself be derived from the observed tempera- there was a global dust storm in year 2 at LS=185° [6] tures and the observed column dust abundance. Along and no global dust storm in year 1. This year-to-year with TES data analysis, the NASA Ames Mars General analysis of how dust storms affect dust flow around the Circulation Model (GCM) will be used to give a self- polar regions can lead to an analysis of how the flux consistent determination of the processes involved. into or out of the polar regions is affected by the strength and/or number of dust storms during the Mar- These model results will be analyzed using the same tian year. methods as the TES data. The TES data and model Along with TES data analysis, we will employ the results should give a reasonable assessment of the net NASA Ames Mars General Circulation Model (GCM) flux of dust around the poles, and help to understand to give a self-consistent determination of the processes whether dust is currently being deposited in the polar involved. Applying the same analysis technique to regions or eroding from these areas. This analysis model results, which provides a comparison of quanti- should provide clues as to the seasonal trends [1- fied dust flux and derived dust flux, will allow for the 3,9,11-12] of the polar-layered terrains that have been identification of potential problems in the analysis. in the spotlight over the past few years thanks to high- The TES data in conjunction with the model results resolution images from the Mars Orbiter Camera should give a reasonable assessment of the net flux of (MOC) onboard MGS. dust around the poles. MGS-TES: MGS has been in orbit around Mars Future Projects: A challenging and fruitful pro- since September 1997. It carries on-board the TES ject beyond understanding the dust flux could be de- instrument which is a Michelson interferometer that has termining the age of the layers from the net flux. The a spectral range of 6-50 µm and a spectral resolution of -1 flux of dust per year, which could give the annual 5 and 10 cm [5]. Vertical profiles of atmospheric deposition of dust per year, could be used in correla- Sixth International Conference on Mars (2003) 3167.pdf
tion with images from MOC (to get the thickness of the layers) and dust sizes measured using TES [8] in order to calculate the age of the layers that can be seen. To do this, we could calculate the mass load, which is the amount of particle mass in a vertical column of atmos- phere with a cross section of unity [7]. This is given by the optical depth τ, particle density ρ, and mean parti- cle radius
The time in years would be given by the flux Fdust [cm/yr] and the density of the layers ρLayers m Time = [years] (2) FDust • ρLayers This technique would be an independent method from counting craters to determine ages of geologic areas on the surface and see how it compares with past determi- nations of the ages of the layers [7,9]. This method of age dating could help determine ages in the North polar region which has a lack of craters over 300 m for age dating [9]. This age dating can also be done in con- junction with changes in Martian orbital characteristics through the NASA Ames GCM to help constrain changes in flux throughout Martian geologic history [10]. Acknowledgements: This work is supported by NASA’s Mars Data Analysis Program (NASA/NAG5- 11164) and by the New Mexico Spacegrant Consor- tium. References: [1] Tanaka K. L. (2000) Icarus, 144, 254-266. [2] Tanaka K. L. and Kolb E. J. (2000) Intl. Conf. Mars Polar Sci. and Explor., Abstract #4103. [3] Zurek R. W. (1999) Fifth Intl. Conf. on Mars, Ab- stract #6028. [4] Santee M. L. and Crisp D. (1995) JGR, 100, 5465-5484. [5] Christensen P. R. et al. (1992), JGR, 97, 7719-7734. [6] Smith M. J. et al. (2002) Icarus, 157, 259-263. [7] Pollack J. B. et al. (1979) JGR, 84, 2929-2945. [8] Snook K. J. (2002) LPS XXXIII, Abstract #1600. [9] Herkenhoff K. E. and Plaut J. J. (2000) Icarus, 144, 243-253. [10] Haberle R. M. et al. (2003) Icarus, 161, 66-89. [11] Laskar et al. (2002) Nature, 419, 375-377. [12] Head J. W. and Kreslavsky M. A. (2002) LPS XXXIII, Abstract #1744. Sixth International Conference on Mars (2003) 3201.pdf
IN-SITU DATING ON MARS: PROCEDURES AND CHARACTERIZATION OF LUMINESCENCE FROM A MARTIAN SOIL SIMULANT AND MARTIAN METEORITES. M. W. Blair1, E. G. Yukihara, R. Kalchgruber, and S. W. S. McKeever, Arkansas-Oklahoma Center for Space and Planetary Sciences, Department of Physics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Ok 74078. 1email:[email protected]
Introduction: The search for past and present a measure of the dose of radiation initially absorbed. environments on Mars that could have supported life The value of the absorbed dose can be determined us- will be assisted by in-situ measurements and future ing appropriate calibration techniques. sample return missions which provide a chronology of The sources of natural radiation are the decay of water activity and aeolian processes, and establish the natural radioactive elements in the soil (U, Th and K), age of geomorphological features on Mars. galactic cosmic rays (GCR), and solar particle events With the current focus on in-situ studies, Lepper (SPE). By determining the rate of natural irradiation and McKeever(1) proposed using luminescence dating (either by direct measurement or calculation) of the techniques to help construct a geological history of mineral one can estimate the radiation exposure age Mars over the last one million years. Aeolian proc- according to: esses have long been suggested to shape the surface of Mars,(2) and studies are still underway to understand Equivalent natural dose, D (Gy) (3) Age, T (a) = these processes. Recent work has also shown that Annual dose rate, R (Gy/a) water could be present on the Martian surface for brief (4) periods of time either currently or in the recent past where the SI unit for dose is the Gray (Gy, 1 J/kg). and could result in features such as young flow chan- The radiation environment on the surface of (5) nels . planet Mars is determined by four factors: the ambient (6,7) New luminescence dating procedures could radiation environment, the properties of the Martian provide ages for several depositional environments, atmosphere, the properties of the Martian surface, and and analysis of the dose distributions among aliquots the radiation interaction models. Using these data the from a sample might help in inferring the nature of the average annual surface dose is calculated to be 51 mGy (8) depositional environments, e. g., aeolian vs. water- from GCR particles and 2.7 mGy from solar (SPE) (9) lain deposits . The equipment required for in-situ particles (based on an 11-year solar cycle)(10). Esti- luminescence measurements is straightforward, and the mates from Martian meteorites suggest an average procedures used for mineral separates (i.e., quartz and background dose rate of just 0.4 mGy/year due to U, feldspars) can be adapted for polymineral materials Th and K(11). Thus, the radiation environment is domi- such as those expected to be encountered on Mars. nated by external radiation, even down to depths of The current work focuses on determining the lumines- >2m(9). cence properties of Martian soil simulants, analogs, Determination of the annual dose rate is thus and meteorites, and using this information to develop simplified for those deposits that are shallow (less than, luminescence dating procedures for use on the Martian say, 2 m) and are stratigraphically stable. For such surface. deposits one can estimate a fixed annual average of approximately 54 mGy/year. These estimates are a Luminescence Dating Principles: Luminescence dat- global average and can be refined for the particular ing is based on solid-state properties of mineral grains location of any future landing. On the other hand, esti- that allow them to record their exposure to radiation. mates of ages for deeply buried deposits would require Absorption of radiation causes ionization of electrons, a measurement or estimate of the background dose rate which subsequently become trapped at electron trap- due to the presence of natural radioisotopes. ping centers within the mineral. The concentration of The age being determined by this method is the such trapped electrons is a measure of the dose of ra- time since the luminescence signal was last zeroed. For diation absorbed. When the irradiated sample is stimu- OSL dating of sediments the zeroing event is the last lated with light or heat, the electrons are released from exposure of the sediment grains to sunlight during their traps and recombine, releasing a portion of the transport, prior to deposition. Deposition then results in stored energy as luminescence. If the luminescence is shielding of the sediment from further sunlight expo- stimulated by light, it is called optically stimulated lu- sure and therefore, the “age” determined by OSL is the minescence (OSL); if it is stimulated by heat it is called time since the last exposure to sunlight – i.e. the depo- thermoluminescence (TL). The intensity of the lumi- sitional age of the sediment. nescence emitted from the mineral during stimulation is Sixth International Conference on Mars (2003) 3201.pdf
Procedures(6) have been developed that allow ratios (measured/given) for JSC Mars-1 were 0.96 and equivalent doses to be measured on one aliquot (sub- 0.84 for two different aliquots, and the corresponding sample) thus greatly simplifying the process (as op- ratio for ALH 77005, 74 was 0.98. The results of these posed to earlier multiple-aliquot methods). The single- experiments show that a known dose can be estimated aliquot regenerative-dose (SAR) procedure uses the to within 5% for both these samples. sample’s response to a fixed test dose to correct for any sensitivity changes (changes in OSL response/ unit Procedure Development: The SAR procedure radiation dose) that occur during the measurement pro- was developed specifically for coarse-grain quartz cedure. The equivalent dose is determined by compar- samples and was later extended to polymineral fine- ing the sensitivity-corrected OSL signals of the natural grain (4-11 µm) samples.(7) As yet, however, no proce- irradiation and known laboratory radiation doses. Ta- dure for coarse-grain (or mixture of grain sizes) has ble 1 outlines the SAR procedure. been developed for polymineral samples. In fact, at- tempts to apply the SAR procedure to coarse-grain Material Characterization: Any materials en- feldspars have been unsuccessful(13). countered on Mars will more than likely be different With the eventual goal of developing a true po- than materials normally used for terrestrial lumines- lymineral procedure, experiments were undertaken to cence dating studies. As a result, it is necessary to find a single-aliquot procedure for coarse-grain feld- characterize the luminescence properties of Martian spars. Five feldspar samples (microcline, oligoclase, soil simulants and analogs. In this paper, we describe anorthoclase, albite, and andesine) were examined to the luminescence signals from polymineral fine-grains determine their general luminescence characteristics, of a Martian soil simulant, JSC Mars-1, and the bulk characterize and understand any sensitivity changes fraction of an SNC Martian meteorite (ALH 77005,74). experienced during repeated measurement cycles, de- TL studies. The TL glow curve of JSC Mars-1 velop sensitivity-correction procedures, and recover a shows a single broad peak between ~100oC and 370oC, known laboratory dose using the procedure. with the maximum intensity at around 270oC(11). The Sensitivity changes do occur in these samples under Martian meteorite ALH 77005,74 has a TL glow curve repeated cycles of radiation dose, preheating, and OSL with two peaks (Fig. 1). The first peak can be observed measurement. However, if TL (to 450oC) is used to between the temperatures ~80oC and 160oC with the measure the luminescence signal, no sensitivity maximum at ~140oC, while the second broad peak changes are seen. Consequently, measuring TL to ranges from 180oC to at least 400oC (the maximum 450oC after each OSL measurement eliminates sensi- annealing temperature) with a peak near 340oC. Many tivity changes from repeated cycles of measurement. Martian meteorites have peaks at ~120oC, suggesting This result is consistent with sensitivity changes caused that feldspar is in the low temperature ordered state(12). by competition among trapping states during irradia- The presence of broad peaks in such samples could be tion and measurement. a consequence of a single broad peak (due to a distri- To correct for sensitivity changes, the SAR proce- bution of charge trapping states) or the superposition of dure (Table 1) was used as an outline. Previous work several smaller peaks. has shown that the entire TL glowcurve is affected by OSL studies. To determine the maximum dose optical stimulation, and this result indicates that the estimable using blue stimulated luminescence signal regeneration dose and test dose irradiations need to be (Fig. 2), the SAR method(6,7) was used to generate blue preheated in the same manner. The SAR procedure stimulated luminescence growth curves for JSC Mars-1 was then modified so that the heating in steps 2 and 5 (Fig. 3) and ALH 77005,74 (Fig 4). For JSC Mars-1, were identical (in both temperature and duration), and the maximum estimable dose for blue optical stimula- the sensitivity correction was tested by giving a fixed tion is ~7500 Gy, which corresponds to an age of 0.14- regeneration dose for 7 cycles. If the procedure is ef- 18.8 Ma using the previous estimates of the minimum fective, the same sensitivity-corrected ratio (Li) should and maximum dose rates for Mars. The maximum es- be obtained for all 7 cycles and the regeneration and timable dose for the ALH 77005,74 sample is ~2500 test dose signals should correlate (i.e., show the same Gy, implying an upper age range of 0.05-6.3 Ma. pattern of sensitivity change). For any dose estimation procedure such as SAR, a The results showed that not only is the same Li ob- fundamental test is to demonstrate that a known dose tained for the 7 cycles, but that the regeneration and can be recovered in the laboratory. To this end, dose test dose OSL signals correlate. This is not the case recovery experiments were performed for the blue when the test dose is heated in a different manner than stimulated luminescence signals from the JSC Mars-1 the regeneration dose. Further tests showed that a TL and the ALH 77005,74 sample. The equivalent dose measurement could effectively be used each cycle (af- Sixth International Conference on Mars (2003) 3201.pdf
ter the test dose OSL), although, as expected, very little trols have not been dated, known laboratory doses sensitivity change is seen in this case. could be recovered to within 5%. For any luminescence dating procedure, the mini- mum requirement is that a laboratory radiation dose References: [1] Lepper, K. and McKeever, S. W. can be recovered using the procedure. We used our S. (2000) Icarus, 144, 295-301. [2] McLaughlin, D. modified SAR procedure to recover a known dose (~9 (1954) Bull. Soc. Amer. 65, 715-717. [3] Kuzmin et. Gy) for all the samples using the blue-stimulated OSL al. (2001) Icarus, 153, 61-70. [4] Hecht, M. H. (2002) signal. The samples were given a large “geologic” Icarus 156, 373-386. [5] Malin, M. C. and Edgett, K. dose and bleached with blue diodes for an extended S. (2000) Science 288, 2330.[6] Murray, A. S., and period of time to simulate natural bleaching. The Wintle, A. G. (2000) Radiation Measurements, 32, 57- known dose was then given and recovered, both with 73. [7] Banerjee, D., Bøtter-Jensen, L., Murray, A. S. and without a TL measurement after each test dose (2000) Applied Radiat. And Isotopes, 52, 831-844. [8] OSL. Table 2 summarizes the results of the dose re- Olley, J. M., Caitcheon, G. and Murray, A. S. (2000) covery experiments. For either case (no TL, or TL QSR, 17, 1033-1040. [9] McKeever et. al. (2003) each cycle), the dose can be recovered to within 5 % Radiat. Meas. In press. [10] Wilson et. al. (1995) when one standard deviation is considered. However, NASA TP-3495. [11] Banerjee et. al. (2002) Rad. a procedure that does not use TL is preferable. Not Prot. Dosim. 101, 321-326. [12] Hasan, F. A., Haq, only is measurement time reduced, but using only OSL M. and Sears, D. W. G. (1986) Geochim. Cosmochim. measurements (assuming the natural sample was Acta, 50, 1031-1038. [13] Wallinga et. al. (2000) Rad. bleached and not heated) allows measurement of the Meas. 32, 691-695. [14] Wintle, A. G. (1973) Nature same trapped charge. Thus, different charge popula- 245, 143-144. [15] Huntley, D. J., and Lamothe, M. tions may be measured in the natural and regenerated (2001) Can. J. Earth Sci. 38, 1093-1106. [16] Vi- OSL signals. For this reason, it is suggested that the cosekas, R. and Zink, A. (1999) Quat. Geo. 18, 271- modified SAR procedure be used without any TL 278. measurements for coarse-grain feldspars. 1. Regeneration radiation dose (D ), 0 Gy if natural The above outlined procedure is far from complete. i signal Feldspathic materials have long been known to suffer 2. Preheat at T oC for 10 s* from anomalous fading,(14) and either a correction(15) or x 3. Measure OSL at 125oC elimination(16) of this problem must be found. The full 4. Fixed test radiation dose (TD ) procedure must then be tested using feldspar samples i 5. Heat to T oC* with independent age controls. y 6. Measure OSL at 125oC Eventually, a true polymineral procedure needs to 7. Repeat steps 1-6 for a range of regeneration be developed. The previous experiments (including an doses, including a repeat point and 0 Gy dose
future anomalous fading corrections) will need to be 8. Find sensitivity-corrected OSL (L =R /T ) i i i repeated with admixtures of minerals (i.e., quartz and feldspars). Finally, polymineral (and possibly mixtures * Tx and Ty determined from experiment of grain sizes) samples will also need to be tested against independent age controls. Table 1: Outline of the SAR procedure. Conclusions: The thermoluminescence and blue stimulated luminescence signals from the JSC Mars-1 4000 and the Martian meteorite ALH 77005,74 have been characterized in this study. Dose recovery experiments 3000 140oC preheat show that radiation doses given in the laboratory can be estimated to within 5% using single-aliquot proce- 2000 dures. The blue stimulated luminescence growth curves no preheat
suggest that the maximum theoretical estimable dose is TL, counts 1000 ~7500 Gy for the JSC Mars-1 sample, and ~2500 Gy 200oC preheat for the ALH 77005,74 sample. 0 A single-aliquot procedure for coarse-grain feld- 0 100 200 300 400 spars (based on the SAR procedure) has been outlined. o The procedure effectively corrects for sensitivity Temperature, C changes in the investigated samples by applying the same preheating regimen after all irradiation doses. Figure 1: TL glowcurve of ALH 77005,74. The Although natural samples with independent age con- curves were produced after a 300 Gy dose. The three Sixth International Conference on Mars (2003) 3201.pdf
graphs represent the TL immediately after irradiation, o o after a 140 C preheat, and after a 200 C preheat as Sample % St. Err. R4/R1 0 dose indicated. Microcline
no TL -0.29 +/- 0.59 1.00 0.01 2400 w/ TL* 4.52 +/- 0.37 0.99 0.00 Oligoclase no TL -1.25 +/- 0.25 1.00 0.01 1600 w/ TL* 0.79 +/- 0.31 1.00 0.01
Anorthoclase no TL OSL, counts 800 w/ TL Albite no TL -1.59 +/- 0.12 1.00 0.02 0 w/ TL 1.71 +/- 0.19 1.00 0.00 02040 Andesine Time, s no TL 0.40 +/- 0.68 1.00 0.00 Figure 2: Blue-stimlated OSL decay curve for JSC Mars-1. w/ TL 5.11 +/- 0.86 1.00 0.01 4 Table 2: Results of feldspar dose recovery experi- ments. An OSL signal could not be detected for 3 Anorthoclase.
2
1
0
Sensitivity-corrected OSL Sensitivity-corrected 0 1000 2000 3000 4000
Regeneration dose, Gy
Figure 3: Sensitivity-corrected dose-response curve for the fine-grain fraction of JSC Mars-1. The signals have been integrated over the first 1 s of stimulation. The open square represents a repeat of the first regen- eration dose.
6
4
2
0 Sensitivity-corrected OSL 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 Regeneration Dose, (Gy)
Figure 4: Sensitivity-corrected dose-response curve for ALH 77005,74. Sixth International Conference on Mars (2003) 3022.pdf
DEFINITIVE MINERALOGICAL ANALYSIS OF MARTIAN ROCKS AND SOIL USING THE CHEMIN XRD/XRF INSTRUMENT AND THE USDC SAMPLER. D.F. Blake1, P. Sarrazin1, S. J. Chipera2, D. L. Bish2, D. T. Vaniman2, Y. Bar-Cohen3, S. Sherrit3, S. Collins4, B. Boyer5, C. Bryson6 and J. King7. 1NASA Ames Re- search Center, MS 239-4, Moffett Field, CA 94035 ([email protected]), 2Hydrology, Geochemistry, and Geology, Los Alamos National Laboratory, MS D469, Los Alamos, NM 87545, 3Science and Technology Devel- opment Section, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, MS 82-105, Pasadena, CA 91109, 4CCD Imaging Group, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, MS 300-315L, Pasadena, CA 91109, 5Oxford Instruments, Scotts Valley, CA 95066, 6Bryson Con- sulting, Morgan Hill, CA 95037, 7Engineering Clinic, Harvey Mudd College, 260 East Foothill Blvd. Claremont, CA.
Mars Astrobiology Goals & Definitive Mineral- mal formation to low temperature precipitation. Other ogy: The search for evidence of life, prebiotic chemis- silica types such as stishovite can provide evidence of try or volatiles on Mars will require the identification of shock metamorphism. Therefore, identification of crys- rock types that could have preserved these. Anything tal structures and structural polymorphs is important. older than a few tens of thousands of years will either be The elucidation of the nature of the Mars soil will a rock, or will only be interpretable in the context of the rocks that contain it. In the case of Mars soil, identify- require the identification of mineral components that ing the nature and quantity of both crystalline and can unravel its history and the history of the Mars at- amorphous components will be essential to under- mosphere. Examples include: standing sources and processes involved in its genera- * Cement components of the soil: magnetic experi- tion. ments conducted on Mars pathfinder suggest that com- The key role that definitive mineralogy plays is a posite grains exist with mixed mineralogies, possibly consequence of the fact that minerals are thermody- cemented by a sulfur-containing component (Gypsum, namic phases, having known and specific ranges of anhydrite, Mg-sulfates, other complex sulfates). temperature, pressure and composition within which * The iron-magnetic component: (ferrihydrite, hema- they are stable. More than simple compositional analy- tite, etc.). The hydration state, oxidation state and de- sis, definitive mineralogical analysis can provide infor- gree of crystallinity of these components provide infor- mation about pressure/temperature conditions of forma- mation on water activity and oxygen fugacity. tion, past climate, water activity, the fugacity (activity) of biologically significant gases and the like. * The oxidative component: Is this a UV photolyzed surface layer or a phase ubiquitous in the soil? Definitive mineralogical analyses are necessary to establish the origin or provenance of a sample: * The global/local dust and soil units: Much of the The search for evidence of extant or extinct life on Mars Mars surface will have been mapped multispectrally at will initially be a search for evidence of present or past high resolution by the time data are returned from the conditions supportive of life (e.g., evidence of water), Mars Science Laboratory. Ground truth mineralogical not for life itself. Definitive evidence of past or present data will serve to validate much of this information. water activity lies in the discovery of: Crystal Structure Information is Required for * Hydrated minerals: The "rock type" hosting the Definitive Mineralogical Analysis: Mineralogical hydrated minerals could be igneous, metamorphic, or identification - the determination of crystal structure - is sedimentary, with only a minor hydrated mineral phase. a critical component of Mars Astrobiological missions. Therefore, the identification of minor phases is impor- Chemical data alone are not definitive because a single tant. chemical composition or even a single bonding type can * Clastic sediments: Clastic sediments are commonly represent a range of substances or mineral assemblages. identified by the fact that they contain minerals of dis- Definitive mineralogical instruments have never been parate origin that could only have come together as a deployed on Mars, and as a result, not a single rock type mechanical mixture. Therefore, the identification of all or mineral has been identified with certainty. Minerals are defined as unique structural and com- minerals present in a mixture to ascertain mineralogical positional phases that occur naturally. There are about source regions is important. 15,000 minerals that have been described on Earth. * Hydrothermal precipitates and chemical sediments: There are likely many minerals yet undiscovered on Some chemical precipitates are uniquely identified only Earth, and likewise on Mars. If an unknown phase is by their structure. For example, Opal A, Opal CT, identified on Mars, it can be fully characterized by tridymite, crystobalite, high and low Quartz all have the structural (X-ray diffraction; XRD) and elemental (X- ray fluorescence; XRF) analysis without recourse to same composition (SiO2) but different crystal structures indicative of different environments - from hydrother- other data because XRD relies on the first principles of atomic arrangement for its determinations. An un- Sixth International Conference on Mars (2003) 3022.pdf
known mineral discovered on Mars could be fully de- Sample preparation for X-ray Diffraction: Powdered scribed (structure and composition), named and likened samples are required for XRD because a near-infinite to terrestrial counterparts without recourse to other data. number of orientations of crystallites to the beam is X-ray diffraction is the principal means of identification needed in order to produce an interpretable pattern [7]. and characterization of minerals on Earth. Chipera et al [8] report on the use of a flight prototype Modern X-ray diffraction methods are able to iden- Ultrasonic Drill (USD) to produce powders suitable for tify all minerals in a complex mixture using full-pattern XRD. Although a two-dimensional detector as used in fitting methods such as Rietveld refinement [1]. When the CheMin instrument will produce good results with X-ray amorphous material is present, Rietveld refine- poorly prepared powders [9], the quality of the data will ment can determine the relative amount of amorphous improve if the sample is fine grained and randomly material, and a radial distribution function can be cal- oriented. culated which will help identify the principal atom-atom distances present in the material. The CheMin XRD/XRF Instrument: The CheMin XRD/XRF instrument [2-6] is capable of de- finitive mineralogical analysis. The original prototype has been modified (and made portable) by replacing the original laboratory source with an Oxford Instruments ApogeeTM small-focus X-ray source (figure 1). In the current version, the small-focus source (70 µm diame- ter) and a 30 µm final aperture yield a beam diameter at the sample of ~100µm. A wide variety of minerals and rocks has been analyzed utilizing 40 KV accelerating voltage and 0.25 µamps beam current (10 watts). Interpretable patterns of single minerals can be obtained in less than an hour and quantifiable patterns of complex rocks can be ob- tained in a few hours.
Figure 2: 2-D diffraction pattern of Olivine
San Carlos Olivine
100
80
60 I (%) 40
20 Figure 1: CheMin II instrument 0
Quantitative mineralogical analyses have been ob- 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 tained for a variety of minerals using the CheMin II 2q prototype. Rietveld refinements have been made using data for apophylite (a zeolite), limestone, limestone- Figure 3: Diffractogram of CheMin olivine data (red) evaporite, San Carlos olivine, the basaltic Mars meteor- vs. positions & intensities of forsterite standard (blue ite Zagami and many others. Refined unit-cell parame- triangles) ters for the San Carlos olivine from CheMin data are 4.757(4), 10.235(5), and 5.995(3) Å, yielding a compo- An Ultrasonic/Sonic Driller/Corer (USDC) cur- sition of Fo90 - Fo95 (figures 2-3). rently being developed at JPL (Figure 4) is an effective mechanism of sampling rock to produce cores and Sixth International Conference on Mars (2003) 3022.pdf
powdered cuttings. It performs best with low axial erated for this sample was composed of spallation de- load (< 5N) and thus offers significant advantages for tritus. However, the <325 mesh fraction (middle his- operation from lightweight platforms and in low grav- togram), which is representative of the material gener- ity environments. The USDC is lightweight (<0.5kg), ated at the cutting tip of the ultrasonic drill, shows that and can be driven at low power (<5W) using duty cy- the drill does an excellent job of generating a fine cling. powder for XRD analysis with much of the powder To assess whether the powder from an ultrasonic less than 10 mm in size. The bottom histogram shows drill would be adequate for analyses by an XRD/XRF the particle size distribution obtained on this sample spectrometer such as CheMin, powders obtained from from a laboratory Retsch mill for comparison. the JPL ultrasonic drill were analyzed and the results The ultrasonic drill did an outstanding job of gen- were compared to carefully prepared powders obtained using a laboratory bench scale Retsch mill. 70 Bulk Ultrasonic Drill Powder Eight samples representing potential target rocks 60
for a Mars lander were prepared for study. The sam- 50 ples include igneous volcanic rocks (basalt and ande- 40 site), sandstone, and evaporite/spring deposit rocks (tufa, calcite veins, and calcite-gypsum evaporites). 30 20 To characterize the particle size distribution for sam- Weight Percent ples obtained from the USDC, each sample was wet 10 sieved through 100, 200, and 325 mesh sieves (150, 0 >150 150-75 75-45 <45 75, 45 µm respectively) and sample weights were re- Particle Size Range ( m) corded. Further analyses were conducted on the <325 60 mesh fraction using a Horiba CAPA-500 particle size <325 Mesh Ultrasonic Drill Powder distribution analyzer set up to bin from 0-50 µm using 50
5 µm bins. 40
30 Backing 20 Stack Weight Percent 10 Ultrasonic Actuator Horn (Backing/Stack/Horn) 0 >50 50-45 45-40 40-35 35-30 30-25 25-20 20-15 15-10 10-5 5-0 Extracted Particle Size Range ( m) powder cuttings Powder Free-Mass 60 cuttings Retsch Mill Powder Drill bit Rock 50
40
30
Figure 4: A schematic view of the USDC components. 20 Weight Percent The USDC is shown to require relatively small preload 10 to core a rock. 0 >50 50-45 45-40 40-35 35-30 30-25 25-20 20-15 15-10 10-5 5-0 Two types of rock powder were generated from Particle Size Range ( m) the drill. Fine powder was generated from the cutting tip itself; the second product consisted of spallation detritus generated during the drilling operation. It was Figure 5: Basal Limestone, Todilto Formation found that the softer materials tended to produce far erating quality XRD powders from all of the materials more spallation detritus than the harder, more compe- tested. XRD patterns obtained from the mechanically tent materials and that the orientation of the drill to the screened ultrasonic drill powders with CheMin II, as rock also affected spallation. Figure 5 shows results well as with a laboratory Siemens D500 XRD unit, are from a sample acquired from the basal limestone of the essentially indistinguishable from powders obtained Todilto Formation (Profile cliffs, Canjilon Creek, New from a laboratory Retsch mill. The particle size distri- Mexico). This sample is composed mainly of calcite butions are also quite comparable between the two with minor quartz and gypsum. The top histogram methods, demonstrating that the ultrasonic drill is more shows that the bulk of the ultrasonic drill powder gen- Sixth International Conference on Mars (2003) 3022.pdf
than adequate to generate powders for a landed References: : [1] Bish and Howard (1988) J. Appl. XRD/XRF spectrometer. Equally important, the phase Cryst. 21 86-91; Bish and Post (1993) Am. Min. 78 composition of powders prepared using the USDC drill 932-942. [2] Vaniman et al. (1991) LPSC XXII 1429- is identical to powders prepared from bulk material 1439. [3] Blake et al. (1992) LPSC XXIII 117-118. [4] using the laboratory Retsch mill. In practice, intro- Blake et al. (1996) US patent no. 5,491,738, “X-ray duction of the powder into an XRD instrument may Diffraction Apparatus.” [5] Vaniman et al. (1998) JGR, require passing the sample through a sieve to separate 103 31477-31489. [6] Sarrazin et al. (1998) J. Phys. IV the drill bit powder from spallation detritus. France 8 Pr5-465 - Pr5-470; Sarrazin et al. (2002) Future CheMin XRD/XRF Instruments: Two Planet. Space Sci., 50 1361-1368. [7] Chipera et al. CheMin III laboratory instruments are being built. The (2003) LPSC XXXIV abstract 1603. [8] Bish and Rey- first is a deep-depleted CCD version suitable for both nolds (1989) Modern Powder Diffraction, MSA Re- XRD and XRF. The second is a phosphor-coated CCD views in Mineralogy, 20 73-99. [9] Vaniman D. T. et al. version suitable for XRD only. The XRD/XRF instru- (1998) JGR, 103 31477-31489. ment, fitted with a Co X-ray source and a deep-depleted CCD, will record both the positions and energies of individual X-ray photons. Deep-depletion will increase the quantum efficiency (QE) for diffracted X-ray detec- tion from 0.05 to at least 0.50, yielding a 10-fold in- crease in count rate. XRD data will be utilized along with XRF results to create a fully quantitative system for both data sets. This is a particularly powerful com- bination since refined lattice parameters from XRD can in many cases be used to calculate composition (e.g., the San Carlos olivine shown in figure 3), enabling a partition of elements into specific oxidation states. In combination with XRF, this will allow the quantifica- tion of complex mineralogies in which solid solution series are present (olivines, pyroxenes, amphiboles, carbonates, etc.). The second instrument, intended for XRD only, will Figure 6: CheMin III prototype. The camera is built by be fitted with a phosphor-coated CCD and a Mo X-ray Andor, Inc. The camera is fitted with an e2v Technolo- source. This instrument will be used to evaluate a more gies 55-30 front-illuminated, deep depletion sensor conservative fall-back strategy which would not require 1242 X 1152 pixels in size with 22.5 µm square pixels. cooling, single-photon counting or thin X-ray windows. The Sample Loading and Manipulation System In addition, the phosphor will result in a QE of 1.0 for (SLIMS) unit is designed and built by students from the the device. A pin diode will be evaluated to collect Engineering Clinic of Harvey Mudd College, and the X- qualitative XRF data for use with the XRD results. ray tube is a commercially available ApogeeTM Co tube A fourth prototype (CheMin IV) which is being de- from Oxford Instruments. signed for the Mars ’09 MSL opportunity, will utilize a CCD camera based on the MER ’03 camera and a car- bon nanotube field emission (CNTFE) X-ray tube de- veloped by Oxford Instruments in collaboration with the Center for Nanotechnology at NASA/ARC (figure 7). The integration of a USD and powder delivery mecha- nism with CheMin IV will yield a robotic, deployable and flight-worthy XRD/XRF instrument. CheMin IV will weigh less than a kilogram and will operate with as little as five watts of power (although increased power will result in shorter data acquisition times). Individual XRD patterns and XRF spectra will comprise a data volume of 2X1024X16 bits. This research was supported by NASA’s Astrobiol- ogy Science and Technology Instrument Development (ASTID) and Mars Instrument Development (MIDP) Figure 7: CNTFE X-ray tube manufactured commer- programs as well as the Director’s Discretionary Fund cially by Oxford Instruments, Inc. of Ames Research Center. PS was supported by a fel- lowship from the National Research Council. Sixth International Conference on Mars (2003) 3237.pdf
HIGH SPECTRAL RESOLUTION SPECTROSCOPY OF MARS FROM 2 TO 4 µm: SURFACE MINERALOGY AND THE ATMOSPHERE. Diana Blaney*1 , David Glenar*2, and Gordon Bjorker*2, 1 NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology 4800 Grove Dr., MS 183-501. Pasadena, CA 91001, Email: [email protected]; 2 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Planetary Systems Branch, Code 693, Bldg 2, Rm 162, Greenbelt, MD 20771, Email: [email protected], [email protected]. * Visiting Astronomers at the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility.
Introduction: The composition of the Martian sur- Observations: Imaging spectroscopy observations face and atmosphere on a global scale has been discov- of Mars from 2 to 4.12 µm at high spectral resolution ered in great part from spectroscopic measurements in (λ/λ∆ ~ 800-2300) were collected in April 1999 using the visible through infrared. Spectroscopic observa- the cryogenic long slit spectrometer at the Kitt Peak tions on Mars however require careful analysis from National Observatory 2.2 m telescope and in July 2001 both atmospheric and mineralogical perspectives. using SpeX at the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility. The 2-4 µm region contains diagnostic absorption The 1999 data have been used to model the cloud opti- features indicative of water such as the 3 µm bound cal depth, particle sizes, and ice aerosol content of the water band and cation-0H stretches between 2-2.5 µm. aphelion cloud belt and to monitor diurnal changes in Carbonate minerals also have absorption features in clouds (Glenar et al. 2003). Preliminary analysis of the these wavelength range. However, this wavelength atmospheric dust, clouds, and ice of the 2001 data has region also has atmospheric signatures from CO, CO2, also been undertaken (Glenar et al. 2002) water vapor, clouds, and atmospheric dust that compli- A high spectral resolution image cube is created by cate direct mineralogical interpretations. Several ab- allowing the spectrometer slit to slowly drift across the sorption features have been identified in the in the 2.0 - disk, while recording a continuous stream of 1D spec- 2.5 µm (e.g. Clark et al. 1990, Murchie et al. 1993, tral x 1D spatial images. Customary processing steps Bell et al. 1994) at moderate resolution. These fea- (flatfield, sky subtraction, photometric corrections and tures, while intriguing, are weak, narrow, and fre- wavelength calibration using lamp or atmospheric fea- quently at the edge of instrumental and observational tures) are applied to each slit spectrum. Figure 1 limits. shows an example drift scan. This example shows the Spectroscopic observations at high spectral resolu- slit motion and Mars aspect geometry during the July tions (λ/λ∆ > 800) can aid in the separation of weak 14, 2001 SpeX observation. Slit is oriented celestial surface and atmospheric absorptions that at lower reso- north-south and drifts west to east on the sky. Drift lution overlap. This paper focuses on understanding rate and spectrum coadd rates are chosen so that there the atmospheric spectral signatures so that the underly- are two spectral records per 0.5 arcsec slit width (Ny- ing surface mineralogy can be understood. quist sampling). During a sequence, the telescope syn- Figure 1. Long slit drift-scan geometry during the 1999 chronously nods north-south to achieve careful sky- KPNO observations subtraction. The series of spectral images is reformat- ted into a spectral image cube. During the drift scan sequence, a boresighted guide camera acquires a con- tinuous time-tagged image series. This is used later on to register each slit image in x and y, using a disk cen- troiding algorithm. The influence of dust and clouds must be fully con- sidered in spectroscopic analysis of the surface. Physi- cal and diurnal properties of water ice clouds can be derived from this data as discussed below, as can the properties of atmospheric dust (e.g., optical depth and single scattering albedo). Finally, once the behavior of dust and clouds is understood, surface mineralogy can be investigated.
Sixth International Conference on Mars (2003) 3237.pdf
fer models incorporating scattering, combined with these observations can be used to estimate dust optical depth and also constrain the dust single scattering al- bedo, which is poorly known at these wavelengths (Clancy et al. 1995). Dotted lines in these plots show the results of scattering model calculations (DISORT, Stamnes et al. 1988) which crudely approximate the observations. Newly available dust RT parameters derived from MGS measurements of emission phase function, were provided for these calculations by Wolff and Clancy (personal communication). Such results are sensitive not only to dust optical depth, but also to the assumed dust vertical distribution.
Figure 2. Three µm band depth map (one of 6) showing ice cloud opacity in a qualitative sense. Dark features near disk center show clouds immediately to the west of Elysium Mons. Other low latitude features arise from the diffuse aphelion cloud belt, and higher latitude features from the 3 µm hydration band Figure 2 and 3 show the distribution and some properties of aphelion season clouds (Ls=130), from L- band image cubes acquired in April '99. Figure 2 shows a map of cloud optical depth obtained from one image cube, albeit poorly represented in this black and white figure. Dark represents larger cloud opacity. Prominent in this map (near center) is an orographic cloud which is just beginning to form on the west flank of Elysium Mons, at about 12:00 LST. Additional features at other positions arise from the diffuse, north tropical cloud band, as well as the spectral influence of the 3 micron surface hydration band, which shows up at higher latitudes. The local time evolution of the Elysium Mons cloud was analyzed quantitatively by fitting the measured cloud spectra from all six image cubes (spanning ~ 5 hours) to scattering models (Gle- nar et al. 2003). As shown in Figure 3, cloud thickness is initially indicative of morning cloud activity (c.f., Colaprete et al. 1999), followed by a decline in optical depth, and once again, prominent cloud growth due to afternoon convection and condensation in the cold aphelion atmosphere (Clancy et al. 1996). The 2001 IRTF measurements were acquired at
Ls=195, coincidentally just after the onset and initial Figure 3. Local time evolution of the Elysium Mons cloud growth of the large, early-season dust storm 2001A spectral shape. Derived optical depth (τ at 3.2 µm) is indi- (Smith et al., 2002). Spectral image data acquired in cated at each time step. K-band (Figure 4) show the effect of dust on the
strength of the 2 micron atmospheric CO2 absorption band. Increased dust opacity in the southern hemi- sphere suppresses the depth of this band, mostly be- cause of the effect of dust scattering. Radiative trans- Sixth International Conference on Mars (2003) 3237.pdf
on the Martian surface independent of possible clouds. Similarly, we can use indications of dust opacity in the 2 µm carbon dioxide gas band to identify clear regions that are minimally affected by the 2001 dust storm. The high spectral resolution also enables the clean identifi- cation of atmospheric features, solar lines, residual telluric absorptions, and weak surface features. Weathered Basalt or Andesite? Banfield et al. 2000 mapped the surface of Mars using data from the Mars Global Surveyor Thermal Emission Spectrometer (TES). They identified two distinctive surface spectral signatures in the low albedo regions. Modeling and comparison to terrestrial igneous materials showed that Type I material (older and located in the Southern highlands) was basaltic in nature while Type II (located in the younger Northern plains) was of andseitic com- position. Wyatt and McSween 2002 put forth an alter- Figure 4. K-band spectra along the central meridian, in the native interpretation for the Type II unit as a weakly northern (top) and southern (bottom) hemispheres during the altered basalt due to: similarities between the spectral global dust storm 2001A. Dotted lines show model compari- characteristics of clays and high silica glass; geochemi- son spectra. cal arguments against the production of large volumes Figure 5 shows a map of atmospheric CO2 band of andesite given Mars’s geologic history; and com- depth, which is a reliable (but qualitative) indicator of parisons between the location of Type II material and dust optical depth. The dark region at north latitudes, proposed standing bodies of water in the Northern near 0 deg longitude indicates a minimum in dust opti- plains of Mars. cal depth. This partial void was also observed by MGS Wavelengths between 2-4 µm have diagnostic ab- TES at about the same Ls (M. Smith, personal commu- sorption features indicative of water such as the 3 µm nication) and was later filled as the dust storm evolved. bound water band and cation-0H stretches between 2-
2.5 µm. The large areal extent of the Type I and Type II units means that ground-based observations in this wavelength range could provide additional information on composition. The 2001 IRTF SPeX data was used to identify Type II material based on observational geometry and evaluation of dust opacity. An represent spectra of this region was extracted using a 3x3 pixel box—shown in red in Figure 6. This represents ~0.9 arc seconds area of the disc and is consistent with our spatial resolution. Note that there are clear albedo contrasts at this wave- length in spite of the dust storm. Figure 7 shows the extracted spectra and the spectra of montmorillonite (a clay). No distinctive cation-OH stretches were seen, indicating that well crystalline clays are beneath our detection limits at this location. No evidence for car- bonates is observed. The fine structure seen in the spectra are due to absorptions in the Martian atmos- Figure 5. Atmospheric CO2 band depth map. This provides phere (including dust, e.g. figure 4) and solar spectral a qualitative, inverse measure of dust optical depth. Bright features. At this spectral resolution mineralogical ab- in this figure indicates larger dust optical depth. sorption features are much broader than those observed The detailed modeling of cloud properties (Glenar in the spectra. et al 2003) permits us to now identify regions where The 1999 KPNO data was used to identify a region the atmosphere is clear and to look for variations in the of Type II material in our dataset between 30° and 3 µm bound water band and for Cation-OH stretches 50°N latitude and 260° - 280°W longitude. The spec- Sixth International Conference on Mars (2003) 3237.pdf
tra show a clear 3 µm bound water band. The attempt Colaprete, A., O. B. Toon and J. A. Magalhaes, Cloud to identify Type I regions that were cloud free in our formation under Mars Pathfinder conditions, J. Geophys. data set was problematic due to its association with Res. 104, 9043-9053, 1999 Glenar R., D.A. E. Samuelson, J. C. Pearl, G. L. Bjo- volcanoes (which develop orographic clouds) and to its raker, and D. L. Blaney, Mars Polar Volatiles: IR Spectral equatorial distribution, which is affected by the aphe- Mapping Results from the Oppositions of 1999 (Ls=130) lion cloud belt. Careful comparison of the Type II ma- and 2001 (Ls=182,195), Bulletin of the American Astro- terial to the Type I basaltic unit and the Martian bright nomical Society, 34, 3, 2002. (DPS Abstract 15.23) regions in the future may permit an assessment of the Glenar, D.A., R.E. Samuelson, J.C. Pearl, G.L. Bjoraker relative hydration state of the Type II materials and and D. Blaney, Spectral Imaging of martian water ice clouds help resolve this debate. However, detailed modeling and their diurnal behavior during the 1999 aphelion season (Ls=130o), Icarus 161, 297-318, 2003. of the spectra will be required and other effects such as Bell et al., Spectroscopy of Mars from 2.04 to 2.44 grain size, cementation, and viewing geometry need to µm during the 1993 Opposition: Absolute Calibration and be assessed. Atmospheric vs. Mineralogic Origin of Narrow Absorption Features, Icarus, 111, 106-123, 1994. Smith M. D., R. J. Conrath, J. C. Pearl, and P. R. Chris- tensen Thermal Emission Spectrometer observations of Mar- tian planet-encircling dust storm 2001A, Icarus, 157 (1): 259-263 2002. Salisbury, J. W., Walter, L. S., Vergo, N., and D'Aria, D. M., Infrared (2.1- 25 micrometers) Spectra of Minerals: Johns Hopkins University Press, 294 pp., 1991. Stamnes, K., S. C. Tsay, W. Wiscombe and K. Jay- aweera, Numerically stable algorithm for discrete-ordinate- method radiative transfer in multiple scattering and emitting layered media, Appl. Opt. 27, 2502-2509, 1988. Smith, M. D., B. J. Conrath, J. C. Pearl and P. R. Chris- tensen, Thermal emission spectrometer observations of Mar- tian planet-encircling dust storm 2001A, Icarus 157, 259- 263, 2002. Wyatt, M. B. and H. Y. McSween, Spectral evidence for weathered basalt as an alternative to andesite in the northern lowlands of Mars, Nature, 417, 263 – 266,2002
Figure 6. Location of the spectrum shown in figure 7. Figure 7. Type II material between 2-2.5 µm and an example clay mineral, montmorillonite. This work is supported by the NASA Planetary As-
tronomy Program, under RTOP 344-32-51-02 and was Type II (Mars) performed at the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 1.1 Montmorillonite
California Institute of Technonlogy and at the NASA 1 Goddard Space Flight Center.
References: Banfield. J. L., V. E. Hamilton, P. R. 0.9 Christensen, A Global View of Martian Surface Composi-
tions from MGS-TES, Science, 287. 1626-1630, 2000. 0.8 Bell et al., Spectroscopy of Mars from 2.04 to 2.44 µm during the 1993 Opposition: Absolute Calibration and 0.7 Atmospheric vs. Mineralogical Origin of Narrow Absorption Features, Icarus, 111, 106-123, 1994. 0.6 Clancy, R.T. and 8 coauthors, Water vapor satura-
tion at low altitudes around Mars aphelion: A key to Mars Normalized Reflectance 0.5 climate?, Icarus 122, 36-62, 1996. Clancy, R. T., S. W. Lee, G. R. Gladstone, W. W. 0.4 McMillan and T. Roush, A new model for Mars atmospheric dust based upon analysis of ultraviolet through infrared ob- 0.3 servations from Mariner 9, Viking and Phobos, J. Geophys Res. 100, 5251-5263, 1995. 0.2 Clark, R.N., et al., J. Geophys. Res., High resolu- 2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 tion reflectance spectra of Mars in the 2.3 µm region: Evi- Wavelength dence for the mineral scapolite, 95, 14463-14480, 1990. Lunar and Planetary Science XXXIV (2003) 3111.pdf
MODELING THE SEASONAL SOUTH POLAR CAP SUBLIMATION RATES AT DUST STORM CONDITIONS. B. P. Bonev1, P. B. James1, M. J. Wolff2, J.E. Bjorkman1, G. B. Hansen3, and J. L. Benson1, 1Ritter Astrophysical Research Center, Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Univ. of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606, USA (bbonev@kuiper.gsfc.nasa.gov; [email protected]; [email protected]; jben- [email protected]), 2Space Science Institute, 3100 Marine Street, Boulder, CO 80303-1058, USA ([email protected]), 3Planetary Science Institute, Northwest Division, Univ. of Washington, Seattle laboratory, Seattle, WA 98195 ([email protected]).
Introduction: Carbon dioxide is the principal 3. Our preliminary average regression curves for component of the Martian atmosphere and its interac- 2001 and 1999 are very similar despite the very differ-
tion with the polar caps forms the CO2 seasonal cycle ent dust storm history. on the planet. A significant fraction of the atmospheric Direct solar constituent condenses on the surface during the polar 2001
winter and sublimes back during spring. The basic yyyyyyy Atmospheric Dust aspects of the CO2 cycle have been outlined by Leighton and Murray [1] and a number of follow-up Thermal