DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Copy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Dhegiha (Ceqina)| 1100s to 1450s Kanza Museum. 2000s Sojumwah, Kaw, 1865. 1100s to 1450s Warrior Statue. A group separated from the Sioux people and became the Dhegiha. This was a group of people who shared a language. After the 1400s they began to divide into smaller Developed by Kanza Museum, Crystal Douglas, Museum Director groups, forming the Contents copyright ©2011 Kaw Nation, Kaw City, Okla., Headquarters Kanza, Osage, Omaha, Ponca and Quapaw. Kaw Nation 698 Grandview Drive • P.O. Box 50 • Kaw City, OK 74641 1-866-404-5297 www.kawnation.com Historical references for this publication are available online at www.kawnation.com Special thanks to Kanza Museum Board Kanza News and Jennie Baker, Editor Bryan M. Richter, Graphic Designer Front cover painting “Weekeitulaw, He Who Exchanges, Kaw, 1832” by George Catlin. Courtesy Smithsonian Institute, Washington, D.C. THE KAW NATION to purchase from the Osages with funds from the sale of their former Kansas holdings. This new land was then split up and allotted to individual families. The allotments were of no benefit to the Kanza. This was a tactic devised to break up the tribe into smaller and more easily manageable units, thus silencing Dhegiha (Ceqina)| the unified voice of the tribe. Nearly 60 years later, the U.S. Army 1100s to 1450s Corps of Engineers flooded a portion of the Oklahoma lands to make a large The Kanza, also called the Kaws or reservoir and recreational area. The Kansa, are a federally recognized Native flooded area housed the Kaw Tribal American tribe officially known as the Council House, the old town of Kaw Nation. The tribe currently consists Washunga and the tribal cemetery. of 3,167 enrolled members living as near It is plain to see that in recent history as Kansas, Texas and Missouri and as the Kanza tribe suffered great tragedies far away as Canada and the United and insults to its traditional way of life. Kaw and Sac & Fox Delegation in Washington D.C., 1867. Charles E. Mix and Lewis Bogy are from D.C. The Kanza are Allegawaho, Kahegawahtiangas and Wahtiangah. Kingdom. The Kanza includes both an But how exactly did the Kaws live prior Executive and General Council, to this time? Let’s look at some of the 2000s comprised of all enrolled tribal members older ways and examine how they above the age of 18. The tribe is impacted the lives of tribal members on area of influence, making and breaking prospects for following herds and administered by an elected Executive a day-to-day basis. camps, following herds and defending its hunting, the Kanza had to look for other Council, consisting of a Chairperson, a It is important to note at this point borders. After contact, the tribe was means of food. Agriculture was the Vice Chair, a Secretary, and four that before modern times, the tribe’s squeezed into smaller and smaller logical alternative, and the adoption of additional elected officials. The tribe has primary means of transmission of corners of its homeland, and forced to agriculture ensured that the tribe would a substantial economic and service base important information down through settle in a few places. forever lose its relationship with the and administers many programs and the generations was oral instead of This lifestyle changeover had a buffalo and ultimately the land. facilities near and around its Seasonal lodging. literary. In other words, the older radical effect on the tribe, and led to the Furthermore, as the tribe settled headquarters in Kaw City, Oklahoma. generations passed things on by word of forced dissolution of many important down, bands gave way to villages. 1100s to 1450s mouth to the younger generations. For cultural institutions of the tribe. For Before then, the tribe existed as a A group separated from The Kanza did not always live in Kanza lived on the vast prairie lands of countless other tribes, all of their lands this reason, there are no written records instance, the Americans wanted the number of mobile bands, which may be the Sioux people and Oklahoma. They are members of a the Great Plains, including most of had been sold to one foreign nation by of the traditional ways of life of Kanza western tribes to adopt agriculture as a thought of as towns on the move. When became the Dhegiha. This much older Mississippi Valley Siouan what is now Kansas, one of two states another one in the Louisiana Purchase was a group of people culture, one that yielded many present- bearing the name of the tribe. of 1803. Americans pushed deeper into tribal members prior to the arrival of primary source of food because it agriculture became the main source of who shared a language. day tribes such as the Sioux, Iowa and While on the plains, the tribe became the interior to take advantage of the Europeans on this continent. required much less land than hunting. food, these bands were forced to stay After the 1400s they began Winnebago (Ho-Chunk). Along with more and more distinct from its wide-open spaces and seemingly endless Because of this, written history of the That land could then be developed for put. This perhaps more than anything to divide into smaller their close cultural relatives the Quapaw, Dhegiha cousins, gradually developing resources. Many tribes were driven tribe begins at a time when the Kanza American interests. In a rapidly succeeded in breaking traditional social groups, forming the Omaha, Ponca and Osage, the Kanza its own language, culture and traditions. westward during this period of American were already in contact with European shrinking world, and with diminished institutions within the tribe. Kanza, Osage, Omaha, are more specifically members of the The Kanza language was no longer expansion. Some of these tribes were and American invaders. Consequently, Ponca and Quapaw. Dhegiha (pronounced they-GEE-hah) understandable with Quapaw and was forced onto Kanza lands, despite drastic the Kaws at this time were actually in a branch of Siouan peoples. Following the increasingly less familiar to Omaha- cultural differences and the fact that state of gross cultural transition between rivers, these tribes migrated toward the Ponca speakers. A uniquely Kanza way some were openly hostile to the Kaws. their traditional ways and the ways they Great Plains probably sometime of life had arisen, and the tribe therefore In addition, American squatters adopted in order to contend with an between the 16th and 18th centuries. enjoyed a long period of independence settling throughout the Kanza hunting increasingly foreign presence at home. According to a popular account, it is and cultural maturity. Unfortunately, it territories demanded more and more Furthermore, it was these cultural said that the Quapaw split off first. They was during this time the threat of land to raise crops and make cities. The outsiders who documented the tribal left the others along the banks of the European American invasion first U.S. government obliged as often as it affairs. Most information from this Mississippi and went southward into became a reality. could — and busied itself renegotiating period may be biased in favor of what is now Arkansas. For that reason, Smallpox, a disease introduced to the treaties, selling off lots and avoiding European or American invaders. It deals the name of their tribe is often continent via European invaders, arrived commitments. Each new treaty more with Kanza cultural adaptation translated as “downstream people.” The in 1755. The affliction killed Kaws drastically reduced the size of the Kanza than Kanza culture in general. Omaha, or “upstream people,” turned without mercy for over a century. In the homeland, once estimated at One of the most noteworthy features northward along with the Ponca and first 10 years after exposure to smallpox, approximately 20 million acres. Finally, of this adaptive period is the tribe’s shift settled in present-day Nebraska. The for example, one of every two Kanza after nearly 70 years of this sort of from a semi-nomadic lifestyle to a Osage and the Kanza were the last to males died. But disease was not the only bureaucratic warfare, the United States sedentary or stationary lifestyle. Prior to part ways. The Osage, or “middle waters problem facing the tribe. American government forced the tribe to cede all contact with the European and people,” stayed in the Ozarks, and the bureaucracy and greed had also reached lands in Kansas. The tribe was moved Americans, the Kaws were very mobile. Kanza, or “wind people,” continued on. the plains. altogether to a roughly 100,000 acre site The tribe as a whole was often moving in Thus, prior to the 20th century, the Unbeknownst to the Kanza and in Indian Territory, which the Kaws had several different directions within its own In March 2010, the Kaw Nation Veterans Society created an Honor Wall dedicated to Kaw tribal members who served their country. The Wall is located in the new Community Center. to purchase from the Osages with funds from the sale of their former Kansas holdings. This new land was then split up and allotted to individual families. The allotments were of no benefit to the Kanza. This was a tactic devised to break up the tribe into smaller and more easily manageable units, thus silencing Dhegiha (Ceqina)| the unified voice of the tribe. Nearly 60 years later, the U.S. Army 1100s to 1450s Corps of Engineers flooded a portion of the Oklahoma lands to make a large The Kanza, also called the Kaws or reservoir and recreational area. The Kansa, are a federally recognized Native flooded area housed the Kaw Tribal American tribe officially known as the Council House, the old town of Kaw Nation.
Recommended publications
  • Allotment and Fractionation Within the Citizen Potawatomi Nation

    Allotment and Fractionation Within the Citizen Potawatomi Nation

    CP 87 and CP100: Allotment and Fractionation Within the Citizen Potawatomi Nation Mark Welliver1 INTRODUCTION The letter came to my father’s house sometime in the early 1990s. His cousin wrote seeking to obtain his consent to sell CP 87 and 100, the Citizen Potawatomi tracts originally allotted to their grandparents, Ellen Yott and Joseph Haas, following the Dawes Act of 1887. By now, ownership of tracts 87 and 100 had become fractionated into eighteen undivided interests through multiple successive heirship divisions. The only way his cousin could alienate his interest was to convince all the heirs to relinquish, by unanimous consent, the trust status of the land. My father discarded the letter, only to pull it out of the wastebasket later and file it away. Yet, the letter had awakened repressed memories and bitter emotions of growing up as an orphan in the Concho and Chilocco BIA schools in Oklahoma, of the death of his parents, of the severe conditions of the BIA boarding schools, and of the abandonment at age nine by his uncle, his legal guardian. CP tracts 87 and 100, he decided, would remain in trust. Besides, he still had not given up the idea of growing pecans on his family’s land. The legacy of CP 87 and 100 dates back, through written narratives, to well over 100 years prior to the General Allotment Act of 1887.2 In the mid-1700s Mahteenose, the daughter of Menominee chief Ahkenepoweh, married a French and Indian fur trader named Joseph LeRoy at what is now Green Bay, Wisconsin.
  • Robert Rankin Recalls His Work with the Kaw People and Their Language Linda Cumberland

    Robert Rankin Recalls His Work with the Kaw People and Their Language Linda Cumberland

    Chapter 6 In his own words: Robert Rankin recalls his work with the Kaw people and their language Linda Cumberland In this edited transcript of a 2011 interview, Robert Rankin discusses his early train- ing in linguistics, his first contacts with the Kaw people and language, andhis subsequent lifelong involvement with the Kaw Language Project. Robert Rankin was fundamental to the development of the Kaw Language Project, an office maintained by the Kaw Nation at its headquarters in KawCity, Oklahoma. Under Bob’s supervision and with his tireless assistance, the KLP has produced an array of language materials, including teaching materials, a volume of KanzaKaw language texts (Kaaⁿze Weyaje — Kanza Reader; Kanza Language Project 2010) and a dictionary (Kaaⁿze Ie Wayaje: An Annotated Dictionary of Kaw (Kanza); Cumberland & Rankin 2012). In the early 2000s, he and then Language Director Justin McBride worked together to assemble a comprehensive collection of all Kaw language data known to exist and archived it at tribal headquarters. His work with the Kaw people and their native language extended over four decades and produced the only available sound recordings of the language, col- lected in the 1970s, from the last native speakers of the language. In December 2011, I, as Language Director at that time, sat down with Bob to ask him to recall those early days of his work and the speakers he worked with. This is an edited version of that conversation. Linda: It’s December first, 2011. I’m in the Kaw Nation Language Office with Dr. Robert Rankin to talk about his field experience in the 1970s, recording the last first-language native speakers of the Kaw language.
  • Tribal and House District Boundaries

    Tribal and House District Boundaries

    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribal Boundaries and Oklahoma House Boundaries ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 22 ! 18 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 13 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 20 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 7 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Cimarron ! ! ! ! 14 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 11 ! ! Texas ! ! Harper ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! n ! ! Beaver ! ! ! ! Ottawa ! ! ! ! Kay 9 o ! Woods ! ! ! ! Grant t ! 61 ! ! ! ! ! Nowata ! ! ! ! ! 37 ! ! ! g ! ! ! ! 7 ! 2 ! ! ! ! Alfalfa ! n ! ! ! ! ! 10 ! ! 27 i ! ! ! ! ! Craig ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! h ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 26 s ! ! Osage 25 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! a ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribes ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 16 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! W ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 21 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 58 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 38 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribes by House District ! 11 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 Absentee Shawnee* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Woodward ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 ! 36 ! Apache* ! ! ! 40 ! 17 ! ! ! 5 8 ! ! ! Rogers ! ! ! ! ! Garfield ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 40 ! ! ! ! ! 3 Noble ! ! ! Caddo* ! ! Major ! ! Delaware ! ! ! ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! Mayes ! ! Pawnee ! ! ! 19 ! ! 2 41 ! ! ! ! ! 9 ! 4 ! 74 ! ! ! Cherokee ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ellis ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 41 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 72 ! ! ! ! ! 35 4 8 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 5 3 42 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 77
  • Quapaw Tribe for the Period 1871 to 1946

    Quapaw Tribe for the Period 1871 to 1946

    • ," • REPORT OF MEETING OF QUAPAW dENERAL COUNCIL HELD AT NORTF!­ EI\5TERN OKLAHOMA Aid,! COLLEGE, MIAMI, ~KLAHOMA, JULY 21, 1962. The meeting was called to Orrh'.T by Chairman .Robert Whitebird at Z: 15 p. ill • • Approxirnately 150 pC!"tJon,·? were in attendance. Minutes of this meeting will be sent to all thoce whC';Je nalnes and addresses appear on the attendance roster. Not aU in attendance ;:;ignc-o this roster. Mrs. Horner Gillnore l(~d the Invocation, which was the Lords Prayer in unlson. Chairman WhitehirrJ read the following agenda: Claim No. l, Dock,,! 14, which was lost. Election of Business Committee members Funds of Q:lapa\V l'ninors 1\1enlbcr.3hip or6ina.nc~ Chairman Whltebird explained that in addition to the agenda, other business hrought before the Coun.cil "\viLl also illclude a report on the possibility of reopening the Claim No. I, under Docket 14, Chairman Whitebird stated tha t Louis Ballard had mailed out 2-pproximately SOD letters to Quapav...'.s concerning this Ina-tter and that 1\1r. Ballard will give a report later on in the nlccting about this nl<ltter. Chairman Whitebird introduced Mr. Graham Holmes, Area Director of the Muskogee Area Office 1 and 1\11". Loyd Roberts, Quapa"\v Clainls Attorney, of • Joplin, lv1i33011ri. Alfred Sky" spoke: "Good af~crnoon. It is nice to be here this afternoon even though we did pave to tarn off th(~ air conditioners. Last year I gave you a financi.J.l report as of JU:le 30, 1961. I will now give you the annnal financial report for UF:: pa.st yC-.Ctr cndlIlg June 3D, 1962.
  • Tribes of Oklahoma – Request for Information for Teachers (Oklahoma Academic Standards for Social Studies, OSDE)

    Tribes of Oklahoma – Request for Information for Teachers (Oklahoma Academic Standards for Social Studies, OSDE)

    Tribes of Oklahoma – Request for Information for Teachers (Oklahoma Academic Standards for Social Studies, OSDE) Tribe:_____Miami Tribe of Oklahoma___________________________ Tribal website(s): http//www.miamination.com_____________________ 1. Migration/movement/forced removal Oklahoma History C3 Standard 2.3 “Integrate visual and textual evidence to explain the reasons for and trace the migrations of Native American peoples including the Five Tribes into present-day Oklahoma, the Indian Removal Act of 1830, and tribal resistance to the forced relocations.” Oklahoma History C3 Standard 2.7 “Compare and contrast multiple points of view to evaluate the impact of the Dawes Act which resulted in the loss of tribal communal lands and2the redistribution of lands by various means including land runs as typified by the Unassigned Lands and the Cherokee Outlet, lotteries, and tribal allotments.” Original Homeland - the Great Lakes region where their homelands lie within the boundaries of the states of Indiana, Ohio, Illinois, lower Michigan and lower Wisconsin. Location in Oklahoma – Far northeastern Oklahoma in an area which includes the Eastern Shawnee, Seneca-Cayuga, Ottawa, Modoc, Peoria, Quapaw, and Wyandotte Tribes of Oklahoma In the Miami language they are myaamia – the downstream people. Today you will hear the name pronounced Miami, a derivation of their traditional name. They originate from the Great Lakes region where their homelands lie within the boundaries of the states of Indiana, Ohio, Illinois, lower Michigan and lower Wisconsin. They were among the nations exposed to early European contact, first through the Jesuit mission in the late 1600s, followed soon after by the French and British invasion and struggle for control of the Great Lakes region.
  • Council Grove Santa Fe National Historic Trail National Park Service City of Council Grove Kansas State Historical Society

    Council Grove Santa Fe National Historic Trail National Park Service City of Council Grove Kansas State Historical Society

    Council Grove Santa Fe National Historic Trail National Park Service City of Council Grove Kansas State Historical Society Conn became a community Conn Store leader, eventually serving as county clerk and treasurer For traders on the Santa Fe Trail after 1858, the Conn of the Town Company, a corporation that platted and Store was a welcome sight. At the store, traders heading sold town lots. In 1866, Conn east from Santa Fe to “the States” could purchase a meal sold his store to Shamleffer & James, who took the store or sleep in a bed for the first time after crossing 625 photo between 1867 and 1871. miles of prairie. For those heading southwest, Council These 1859 advertisements from the Kansas Grove was one of the last major stops for supplies and Press illustrate the rivalry between Council amenities before travelers trekked to New Mexico. Grove’s two most prominent merchants. Malcolm Conn’s stone store, built in 1858, rivaled the outfitting firm already run by Seth Hays on the opposite side of the street. Business was brisk, with Conn selling $24,000 in merchandise in one month in 1864. He traded with freighters, the government, locals, and Kaw (Kansa) Indians, on whose reservation Council Grove was located. In his stock were found every known One of the oldest buildings still standing in Council variety of goods for use on the frontier, Grove, the Conn Store provided accommodations, from ox yokes and repairs to cambric meals, and stables for freighters, in addition to retail operations. needles, from small boxes of pills to barrels of whiskey.
  • HUNGRY GHOSTS: PONCA GIRLS in TWO WORLDS by ANN

    HUNGRY GHOSTS: PONCA GIRLS in TWO WORLDS by ANN

    HUNGRY GHOSTS: PONCA GIRLS IN TWO WORLDS By ANN MARIE WASILEWSKI Bachelor of Arts Augusta College Augusta, Georgia 1969 Master of Education University of Georgia Athens, Georgia 1976 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION July, 2004 COPYRIGHT By Ann Marie Wasilewski July, 2004 ii HUNGRY GHOSTS: PONCA GIRLS IN TWO WORLDS Thesis Approved: Pamela U. Brown Thesis Advisor Pamela Fry Gary J. Conti Katye M. Perry Dr. Al Carlozzi Dean of the Graduate College ii Dedicated to my mother and father. Catherine Howard Wasilewski Walter John Wasilewski iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I want to express my deep gratitude to my dissertation advisor, Dr. Pam Brown, for her extreme patience, constructive guidance, and gentle encouragement. Your kind words were a balm to my soul as I struggled through this process. Second, I want to thank my committee members, Dr. Gary Conti, Dr. Pamela Fry, and Dr. Katye Perry. I am so appreciative of the time you spent reading my dissertation and for the suggestions you made to improve it. Third, I want to acknowledge two former members of my committee, Dr. Natalie Adams and Dr. Pamela Bettis, who moved on to different universities. Without your interest, guidance, and assistance I would not have made it this far. Fourth, I thank the Ponca girls and the members of the Ponca community who shared their thoughts and culture with me. It was a tremendous education. I also want to thank my Bahá’i friends, Nancy and Jim Schear, for their encouragement and the hours they spent with me at their dining room table going over my drafts.
  • Muscogee (Creek) Nation in Support of Petitioner ______

    Muscogee (Creek) Nation in Support of Petitioner ______

    No. 18-9526 IN THE JIMCY MCGIRT, Petitioner, v. OKLAHOMA, Respondent. _____________ On Writ of Certiorari to the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals _____________ BRIEF FOR AMICUS CURIAE MUSCOGEE (CREEK) NATION IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER _____________ ROGER WILEY RIYAZ A. KANJI ATTORNEY GENERAL Counsel of Record KYLE HASKINS DAVID A. GIAMPETRONI FIRST ASSISTANT KANJI & KATZEN, PLLC ATTORNEY GENERAL 303 Detroit St., Ste 400 MUSCOGEE (CREEK) Ann Arbor, MI 48104 NATION (734) 769-5400 Post Office Box 580 [email protected] Okmulgee, OK 74447 (918) 295-9720 CORY J. ALBRIGHT PHILIP H. TINKER LYNSEY R. GAUDIOSO KANJI & KATZEN, PLLC 401 Second Ave. S., Ste 700 Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 344-8100 Counsel for Amicus Curiae Muscogee (Creek) Nation i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ..................................... iii INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE ............................1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ...............................................................1 ARGUMENT ...............................................................5 I. The United States and the Creek Nation Established a Reservation by Treaty. .............5 A. Text ........................................................5 B. Surrounding History .............................8 II. The Creek Allotment Act Preserved the Nation’s Reservation. ..................................... 11 A. Text ......................................................12 B. Surrounding History ........................... 16 C. Hitchcock and Buster ........................... 17 III.
  • Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma

    Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma

    QUAPAW TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA Ao. 80x 765 (918) 542-1853 "'lIrIOPOW. Oklahoma 74363 Quapaw Tribal Business Committee FAX (918) 542-4694 Regular Meeting, 9:30 a.m. January 9, 1993 ATTENDING: Lloyd Buffalo, Chairman Leonard Smith, Vice Chairman Jeralyn Brittle, Sec./Treas. Mike McKibben, Member Frances Hawk, Member (arrived at 10:10) ABSENT: George Romick, Member (excused) Linda Morgan, Member (excused) OTHERS ATTENDING: Nettie Detherage, Cindy Weiss, John Todd Wes Valliere, Raymond Griffin Chairman Buffalo called the meeting to order at 9:30 a.m. Lenoard smith gave the invocation. Secretary carried out the roll call and announced a quorum to do business, Chairman Buffalo declared a quorum to do business. Nettie advised the Business Committee that Barbara Kyser, Tribal Administrator was ill and would not be at the meeting . Minutes of 12/12/92, 12/17/92, 12/18/92, 12/29/92 were • presented for corrections and approval. Mike stated that his name was left off of the 12/17/92 minutes, Secretary so noted and corrected. Leonard moved to accept the minutes of 12/12/92, 12/17/92 with correction, 12/18/92 and 12/29/92. Mike second. Call for the question. Vote: 4 yes, 0 no, 0 abstain, 3 absent. Treasurer report was given. Discussion was held on the CD at Cimmarron Federal. Secretary suggested that the $2000 that was to be given to the Convenience Store be taken out of the Concession Account and when the CD matures on Febuary 22, 1993, reimburse the Concession Account so as not to have a penalty.
  • Tribal-Led Cleanup Activities at the Tar Creek Superfund Site

    Tribal-Led Cleanup Activities at the Tar Creek Superfund Site

    A SUITE OF OPTIONS AT TAR CREEK Craig Kreman and Summer King Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma American Society of Mining and Reclamation June 6, 2018 2 PRESENTATION OVERVIEW • History • Tar Creek Superfund Site • Past, Present And Future Remedial Projects • “We need more options!” ▫ Soil Amendments ▫ GIS Kriging ▫ Ecological Risk values • Questions/Answers 3 QUAPAW TRIBE HISTORY • Several hundred years ago, the Quapaw were a division of a larger group known as the Dhegiha Sioux. They split into the tribes known today as the Quapaw, Osage, Ponca, Kansa, and Omaha. • The Quapaw moved down the Mississippi River into Arkansas. This is how the Tribe became known by other Tribes as “Ugaxpa” (“Ugakhpa”), which means (roughly) “the downstream people.” • The Quapaws settled in the area where the Arkansas River met the Mississippi River. • This is where the Quapaw stayed until they were pushed out by the Arkansas Territorial, and US Governments in the 1820s. • After being removed from Arkansas, the Quapaws suffered greatly from disease and starvation until the US Government was finally convinced in 1833 to establish a reservation for them in Oklahoma. 4 QUAPAW TRIBE HISTORY 5 TAR CREEK SUPERFUND SITE • Tri-State Mining District • Mining began in the area during the late 1800’s and lasted until approximately 1970 • Mining and milling of ore (primarily lead and zinc) produced more than 500 million tons of waste in area • Two primary types of wastes from mining processes: chat and fine tailings TAR CREEK SUPERFUND SITE 7 TAR CREEK SUPERFUND SITE 8 TAR CREEK SUPERFUND SITE 9 TAR CREEK SUPERFUND SITE 10 TAR CREEK SUPERFUND SITE 11 TAR CREEK SUPERFUND SITE 12 TAR CREEK SUPERFUND SITE 13 TAR CREEK SUPERFUND SITE 14 TAR CREEK SUPERFUND SITE FOR EVERY 1 TON OF ORE EXTRACTED, APPROXIMATELY 16 TONS OF CHAT AND TAILINGS WAS LEFT BEHIND 15 TAR CREEK SUPERFUND SITE 16 REMEDIAL ACTION ACTIVITIES CATHOLIC 40 • “Catholic 40” • Tribal Trust Land • 40-acre parcel owned by the Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma and was set aside in 1892 to the Catholic Church for religious and education purposes.

  • Winter 2020|Ogahpah Ikazozo

    Winter, 2020 Volume II, No. 1 e o cial quarterly publication of the Quapaw Nation 18-Year Goodeagle Suit Finally Sett led, Sett lement Checks Coming in February to Landowners On January 29, Chairman John Berrey, pictured above , att ended Presi- dent Trump's signing of the historic U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement on the White House lawn. Chairman Invited to White House WASHINGTON, D.C.—Quapaw Nati on Chairman John L. Berrey att ended President Trump’s signing of the historic U.S.-Mexico- Canada Agreement on the White House lawn today. “On behalf of the Quapaw Nati on and my people, I was hon- ored to be there when President Trump signed the USMCA, an accomplishment that few people thought was possible,” Chair- man Berrey said. Chairman Berrey joined American workers and farmers, union members, U.S. Senators and members of the House of Rep- See White House, page 2 Saracen Casino Resort Could Open in May Pine Bluff , AR—Less than 160 days are left unti l the Saracen Casino Resort could open its doors for business. Constructi on workers are doing their best to race the clock on their work schedule to fi nalize the fi rst phase of the development and see the project open as soon as possible. Under the contract, June 26th has been set as the proposed opening date for casino operati ons to begin at Saracen Ca- sino. According to Chairman John Berrey, the casino should be ready to welcome customers even sooner than initi ally planned. Chairman Berrey is aiming for a soft opening in May 2020.
  • Honoring Nations Directory of Honored Programs 1998-2018

    Honoring Nations Directory of Honored Programs 1998-2018

    HONORING NATIONS DIRECTORY OF HONORED PROGRAMS 1998-2018 HONORING CONTRIBUTIONS IN THE GOVERNANCE OF AMERICAN INDIAN NATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS About Honoring Nations 1 Honoring Nations Board of Governors 2 Administration 3 Sponsoring Organizations 4 Honored Programs 5 Program Descriptions 8 Index 59 Programs by Year 50 Programs by Topic Area 72 Programs by Tribe 77 About Honoring Nations Established in 1998, Honoring Contributions in the Governance of American Indian Nations (Honoring Nations) identifies, celebrates, and shares outstanding tribal government programs and practices in Native nation building. The program is administered by the Harvard Project on American Indian Economic Development (Harvard Project) at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government. By shining a bright light on successes in tribal governance, Honoring Nations is contributing to the expanding professionalism of Native nation builders, allowing Native leaders and decision makers to learn from their peers. High public visibility and news coverage of Honoring Nations also permit non- Native policymakers, the media, and the general public to see what Native nations are actually doing in the drive for self-determination. Honorees demonstrate a commitment to fortifying sovereignty, cultural identity, and good governance. They also serve as models of inspiration, innovation, and practicality, eliminating the need to “re-invent the wheel” for many other growing communities. The best practices and innovations of honorees form the raw material from which the Harvard Project fashions usable tools for nation building. Honoring Nations provides a critical value to today’s Native nations. Decades of federal policies— including overt attempts at assimilation and termination—left American Indian communities the poorest in the United States.