SB-16-CRM-1276-1285 People Vs Crispina Vega Salumbre
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
xoMS REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES QUEZON CITY SEVENTH DIVISION PEOPLE OF THE PHBLEPPINES, Crim. Case No. SB-16-CRM-1276 Plaintiff, to 1278 For: Violation of Sec. 7 of - versus - Republic Act No. 3019, as amended CRISPEVA VEGA SALUMBRE, Accused, -X PEOPLE OF THE PHELffPINES, Crim. Case No. SB-16-CRM- Plaintiff, 1279 to 1281 and 1283 to 1285 For: Violation of Sec. 8(A) of - versus - Republic Act No. 6713 CRISPINA VEGA SALUMBRE, Accused, X- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Crim. Case No. SB-16-CRM-1282 Plaintiff, For: Violation of Sec. 8 of Republic Act No. 6713 - versus - CRISPINA VEGA SALUMBRE, Present: Accused, Gomez-Estoesta, J., Chairperson^ Trespeses, J. and Hidalgo, J. Promulgated: X- -X 'J People V. Crispina Vega Salumbre. Crim. Case No. SB-16-CRM-1276 to 1285 Page 2 of54 DECISION TRESPESES,/.: Accused Crispina Vega Salumbre has been charged under ten (10) separate Informations, to wit: three Informations for violation of Sec. 7 of Republic Act No. 3019, as amended; one Information for Violation of Sec. 8 of Republic Act No. 6713, and six Informations for Violation of Sec. 8(A)of Republic Act No. 6713. Proceedings Before the Sandiganbayan On 6 December 2016, the Informations were filed with the Sandiganbayan by the Office ofthe Ombudsman, which reads: I. For Violation ofSec, 7 ofR.A, No. 3019 Crim. Case No. SB-16-CRM-1276 That on April 30,2000, or sometime prior or subsequent thereto, in the City ofPasig, Metro Manila,Philippines, and within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, accused CRISPINA VEGA SALUMBRE, a public officer, being then the City Treasurer of Pasig and, as such, required by law to file her sworn Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Networth (SALN), while in the performance of her official function and committing the offense in relation to her office, did then and there willfully, unlawfully and criminally fail to file the required SALN for the Calendar Year 1999 declaring her true detailed assets, liabilities and networth as of December 31.1999. CONTRARY TO LAW. Crim. Case No. SB-16-CRM-1277 That on April 30,2001, or sometime prior or subsequent thereto, in the City ofPasig, Metro Manila,Philippines, and within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, accused CRISPINA VEGA SALUMBRE, a public officer, being then the City Treasurer of Pasig and, as such, required by law to file her sworn Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Networdi (SALN), while in the performance of her official function and committing the offense in relation to her office, did then and there willfully, unlawfully and criminally fail to file the required SALN for the Calendar Year 2000 declaring her true detailed assets, liabilities and networth as of December 31.2000. CONTRARY TO LAW. f People V. Crispina Vega Salumbre. Crim. Case No. SB-16-CRM-1276to 1285 Page 3 of54 X X Crim. Case No. SB-16-CRM-1278 That on April 30, 2002, or sometime prior or subsequent thereto, in the City ofPasig, Metro Manila,Philippines, and within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, accused CRISPINA VEGA SALUMBRE, a public officer, being then the City Treasurer ofPasig and, as such,required by law to file her sworn Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Networth (SALN), while in the performance of her official function and committing Ae offense in relation to her office, did then and there willfully, unlawfully and criminally fail to file the required SALN for the Calendar Year 2001 declaring her true detailed assets, liabilities and networth as of December 31,2001. CONTRARY TO LAW. II. For Violation ofSec, 8 of Republic Act No, 6713 Crim. Case No. SB-16-CRM-1282 That on April 30,2006, or sometime prior or subsequent thereto, in the City ofPasig, Metro Manila,Philippines, and within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, accused CRISPfi^A VEGA SALUMBRE,a public officer, being then the City Treasurer of Pasig and, as such, required by law to file her sworn Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Networfii (SALN),while in the performance of her official function and committing the offense in relation to her office, did then and there willfully, unlawfully and criminally fail to file the required SALN as of December 31, 2005 declaring her true detailed assets, liabilities and networth and disclosing her business interests and financial connections including those of her spouse and unmarried children under eighteen (18) years of age living in her household. CONTRAR Y TO LAW. in. For Violation of Sec, 8(A) of Republic Act No, 6713 Crim. Case No. SB-i6-CRM-1279 That on January 7, 2003, or sometime prior or subsequent thereto, in the City ofPasig, Metro Manila,Philippines, and vrithin the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, accused CRISPINA VEGA SALUMBRE, a public officer, being then the City Treasurer ofPasig and,as such, required by law to file her sworn Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Networth (SALN), while in the performance of her official function and committing the offense in relation to her office, did then and there willfully, unlawfully and criminally fail to declare in her sworn SALN as ofDecember 31,2002 the following real and personal properties, namely: People V. Crispina Vega Salumbre. Crim. Case No. SB-16-CRM-1276 to 1285 Page 4 of54 X 1. Lot in Barangay San Miguel covered by TCT No. PT-108973, 2. Lot in Barangay San Miguel covered by TCT No. PT-108975, 3. Lot in Pinagbuhatan, Pasig City covered by TCT No. PT-113692, 4. Kia Picanto with Plate No.ZCF 899 5. Ford Escape with Plate No.ZDY 306 6. Mitsubishi L-300 with Plate No. UNW 877, and her business and financial interest as incorporator in: 1. The Integrated Manpower Resources, Inc., and 2. Potassium, Inc., and erroneously declare as acquisition cost. Six Hundred Fifty Thousand Pesos (P650,000.00) for her house and lot in Suarezville, Pinagbuhatan, Pasig, and Two Hundred Thousand Pesos(P200,000.00) for her apartment house and lot in Purok, Rizal, instead of Thirty-Three Thousand Six Hundred Pesos (P33,600.00) and Twenty-Five Thousand Pesos (P25,000.00), respectively, thereby causing damage and prejudice to public interest. CONTRAR Y TO LAW. Crim. Case Nos. SB-16-CRM-1280 to 1281 and 1283 to 1285 They are similarly worded as the Information in Crim. Case No. SB-16- CRM-1279 above-quoted and only differ in the dates ofthe commission ofthe offense, as shown below: • Case Number Date ofCommission ofOffense SB-16-CRM-1280 June 29,2004(for SALN as of December 31,2003) SB-16-CRM-1281 March 28,2005 (for SALN as of December 31,2004) SB-16-CRM-1283 April 30,2007(for SALN as of December 31,2006) SB-16-CRM-1284 June 23,2008 (for SALN as of December 31,2007) SB-16-CRM-1285 June 9,2009(for SALN as of December 31,2008) On 13 December 2016, a Hold Departure Order^ was issued against accused. After an assessment ofthe records in these cases, the Court issued a Minute Resolution dated 14 December 2016^ finding the existence ofprobable ^ Records, Vol. 1, p. 288. ^ 2 Id. at 291. ^ 1 People V. Crispina Vega Salumbre. Crim. Case No. SB-16-CRM-1276 to 1285 Page 5 of54 X X cause for the issuance of a warrant of arrest against accused.^ On 10 January 2017, accused posted reduced cash bond"^ for her provisional liberty.^ Accused filed a Motion to Quash^ to which the prosecution filed its Opposition.^ On 3 March 2017, her Motion was denied for lack of merit.^ Thereafter, accused filed a Motion for Reconsideration,^ which was likewise denied in a Minute Resolution dated 2 May 2017.^® On 8 May 2017, accused filed a Motion to Dismiss^ ^ whereas the prosecution filed its Opposition on 12 May 2017. In the Minute Resolution dated 19 May 2017, ^e Court denied the Motion to Dismiss for lack of merit. During the scheduled arraignment on 22 May 2017, accused and her counsel failed to appear despite notice. Instead, a medical certificate was submitted through a representative but it does not bear a dry seal from the hospital. Thus, the cash bond posted by accused was forfeited in favor of the government and a warrant of arrest was again issued against her.^^ Consequently, the arraignment was reset to 7 June 2017. Meanwhile accused filed an Urgent Ex Parte Motion to Lift Warrant of Arrest. On 7 June 2017,the Court granted accused's ex parte motion and the cash bond she posted was reinstated. On even date, accused was arraigned and pleaded Not Guilty to the charges. During the pre-trial conference, the parties stipulated on the following: 1. Identity of accused Crispina Vega Salumbre as the same person who is the accused in these criminal cases; 2. That accused Crispina Vega Salumbre is a public officer, or the City Treasurer, City of Pasig, at the time material to these cases enumerated as stated in the Information: • For Crim. Case No. SB-16-CRM-1276- on April 30,2000; • For Crim. Case No. SB-16-CRM-1277- on April 30,2001; • For Crim. Case No. SB-16-CRM-1278- on April 30,2002; • For Crim. Case No. SB-16-CRM-1279- on January 7,2003; • For Crim. Case No. SB-16-CRM-1280- on June 29,2004; ^ Records, Vol. 1, p. 292-294. ^ Id. at 319(O.R. No. 7381979 dated 10 January 2011 in the amount ofP41,000.00). Md.at320. ® Id. at 344-350. Md. at 358-366. «Id. at 370-374. ''Id. at 380-389. '0 Id. at 400-404. "Id. at 406-409. '2 Id.