Incident Tally by Month

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Incident Tally by Month Rescue Slides from Jonathan Hart of J. Hart 9- 10 GCSAR Scotland All HMK students salute all Emergency 9-11 Services workers. All Grand County Fair Search and 9- 21 Dave and Barbara Rescue booth 9- 26 GCSAR Working with Search Dogs Nancy May 10- 8 GCSAR Leadership and OIC: The Reality of it Rex Tanner 10- 24 GCSAR Mock Incident TBerry 11- 12 GCSAR CPR 11- 26 GCSAR CPR 12- 10 GCSAR Winter Rescue Eric Trenbeath 12- 21 S. O. Party Incident Tally by Month 2002- J-0 F-3 M- 9 A- 8 M- 10 J-12[42] J- 5 A-7 S-7 O- 9 [70] 2001- J-0 F-2 M- 5 A-11 M- 8 J- 6 [32] J- 6 A-3 S-2 O- 2 [45] N-5 D-1 [51] 2000- J-2 F-4 M- 9 A-13 M- 14 J- 7 [49] J- 3 A-2 S-9 O- 7 [70] N-0 D-0 [70] 1999- J-1 F-1 M-15 A- 4 M- 11 J- 8 [40] J- 6 A-9 S-9 O-13 [77] N-7 D-2 [86] 1998- J-0 F-1 M- 5 A-18 M- 15 J- 3 [42] J-10 A-2 S-4 O- 9 [67] N-3 D-1 [71] 1997- J-4 F-6 M-10 A- 8 M- 16 J- 9 [53] J- 4 A-6 S-5 O- 9 [77] N-8 D-0 [85] 1996- J-4 F-5 M- 2 A-12 M- 14 J- 7 [44] J- 5 A-5 S-5 O- 6 [65] N-9 D-4 [78] average: [43] 02- 55 9- 6- 02 Door to door Explaining Bad Water Something happened to part of the local culinary water system that turned the water "bad." We organized with the Fire Club and went door to door to notify the citizens NOT to use their water except to flush the toilet. "Oh my," most said. "We've already had dinner and done the dishes." Samples were sent up-state to the lab and as of Monday 5 pm, nothing has been said. Comments: Responders: Rex, TBerry, Sam, Jennie, Bego and some Fire Club folks Flash Flooding in Canyonlands National Park- Hummer as boat- frightening ride for a family On Saturday, September 7, at approximately 4:15 pm, the Island-in-the-Sky District of Canyonlands National Park was buffeted by high winds and torrential rains that deposited 3/4" of water in under one hour. There were extensive backcountry road wash-outs accompanied by flash-flooding. The flash flooding was the most significant flooding documented in the history of the Island in the Sky. At approximately 6pm, a family of four from Provo, Utah, was driving up Taylor Canyon. The four wheel drive road winds in and out of a dry wash. At approximately 6 pm, the family saw a four inch curb of water approaching them down the wash. Within a minute, the water had swelled up to mid-level of the windshield of their 1998 Humvee and shortly thereafter was 10' deep. At peak flow the wash was estimated to be flowing at approximately 2,000 cubic feet per second which is nearly double the current flow of the Colorado River. The wash was approximately 300' wide at peak flow with a water temperature of approximately 55 degrees. The vehicle floated downstream for approximately 4 miles over the next 15 minutes at which time the family was able to exit the vehicle, get to shore, and seek shelter in an alcove. During this process, the father stated he had to swim with his 5 month old and 3 year old sons tucked under his arms after exiting from a door while his wife was exiting through a window. Later in the night their cries for help were overheard by campers nearby, who took them in for the night, and gave them a ride out to the Island in the Sky Visitor Center the following morning. The vehicle was recovered and is totaled. Vehicle loss is estimated at $60,000. The 100 mile White Rim backcountry road is currently closed to through traffic. A damage assessment is being conducted on the backcountry road system. Cost estimates for the repair of extensive damage will be completed. The Shafer Trail may take several months to repair and will remain closed until repairs are done. It is hopeful that repairs at Upheaval Bottom, Taylor Canyon and Lathrop Canyon can be completed within the next week. Ranger Paul Downey was the Incident Commander. [Steve Swanke, RISKY] GCSAR Rock Rescue training 9- 10- 02 "The Red Mist" by Jonathan Hart One of the best classroom rock rescue trainings ever. And a bonus hit for EMTs regarding all the latest on treating cold injuries in the cold. Jonathan Hart from a Scottish Rescue Team spoke and showed slides. Their group, formed in 1906, is the most active in Scotland, in all 4 seasons but mostly in the winter cuz of the popularity of ice climbing on Ben Nevis. The highest mountain around, it suffers from much bad weather from fast, wet North Atlantic storms. Conditions and weather change wildly. They deal out cold injuries alot. Says most accidents can be traced back to "bad navigation." He's in America, staying with and studying a bunch of rescue groups and their methods all over the country. Bloody hell. 9 - 11 A "Thank You" from the HMK school-- A short and incredibly emotional Thank You to All The People in Emergency Services gathering. The STUDENTS at HMK read some poetry, sang a song and presented some art work with student signatures to each department head. Principal Margaret Hopkin spoke briefly. We observed a moment of silence in remembrance to the Ground Zero sadness. Moab's finest presented the colors. Comments: Students helping the adults feel good. Totally awesome. Responders: Sheriff's Office, Moab Police, American Legion, Search and Rescue, the National Park Service, BLM Fire, Hiway Patrol, Veterans of Foreign Wars, Moab Valley Fire Dept. Probably 60 or so of us, all dressed up. 02- 56 9- 11- 02 Body Recovery Colorado River GCSAR was requested by the Sheriff's Office to drive the River Rescue Boat to recover a body that had washed ashore along the river near Rocky Rapid. Comments: Ick. Turns out he had a small caliber bullet hole in the back of his head. Oh my..... Responders: Bego, Sam, Nancy, Shalla 02- 57 9- 12- 02 ATV Rollover Pritchett Canyon Mostly a replay of 02- 30 in May except this was an ATV rollover. About 1:30 pm. Two guys out ATV riding when one crashes over backwards at the Rock Pile. It was a jeep party just ahead of them that continued out to the south until they could get cell reception with dispatch- about 3:15 pm. We were paged, EMS was paged and Careflight put on standby. Frank got LZ coordinates from Well's book. We responded shortly later with EMS and Careflight was asked to launch. As with 02-30, Careflight got there first cuz getting even an ATV up Pritchett Canyon is difficult. The same pilot landed in the skid tracks he'd made in May (a statement about how much rain we've had). As they were packaging the subject, our folks arrived to help carry a thousand feet to the helo. Comments: Jennie Tuft figured out a pizza delivery to ICP- nice. As usual, there is no communication OUT of Pritchett. Sam and Dick went in from the south in the Bronco and got clear to Yellow Hill but no commo there either. The team in Pritchett HAS to wear earphones, have a radio on "NLET" channel and use the helo as communications relay. There just isn't any other way. Persuasive argument for a satellite phone. Responders: Rex, Bego, Jeremy, Lee, Jim D, Sam, Dick, Dave, Frank, Kevin, Shaun Gary Haynes brought out Jonathan Hart, the Scottish rescue guy visiting locally. 9 - 13 Fri Homecoming Parade Traffic detail with Moab City Police. Next time we need at least 6 of us to show up, please. English: (from Reader's Digest) It is wrong to ever split an infinitive. Contractions aren't necessary. The passive voice is to be avoided. Prepositions are not the words to end sentences with. Be more or less specific. One word sentences? Eliminate. Who needs rhetorical questions? Exaggeration is a billion times worse than understatement. "It isn't pollution that's harming the environment. It's the impurities in our air and water that are doing it." - George W. Bush. 02- 58 9- 16- 02 Evidence Search Investigators Brewer and White had 8 of us out looking for "anything" that might be connected with the the body recovered in incident 02- 56. Nancy and Shalla. Grid searches thru the Tammys and brush. Hiking in mud along the shorelines (really high quality river mud tho), cruising the shores on the Jet Skis (both of which had problems). Underwater metal detector. Comments: Nope. The river is quite a bit higher than it was on the day of the event. Responders: Matt, Sam, Dick, Dave, Nancy, Shalla, Lee (a retired gentleman), Bego Shaun, Jeff Curt Brewer and his boy White, Steve Brownell 02- 59 9- 19- 02 Rock Topples, Canadians Topple with it Determination Towers At first it seemed like this was a climbing accident on Determination Towers. No. Mr. and Mrs. Ross from Alberta clambered up onto a small summit of rock about 30 feet high for pictures.
Recommended publications
  • Arizona TIM PALMER FLICKR
    Arizona TIM PALMER FLICKR Colorado River at Mile 50. Cover: Salt River. Letter from the President ivers are the great treasury of noted scientists and other experts reviewed the survey design, and biological diversity in the western state-specific experts reviewed the results for each state. RUnited States. As evidence mounts The result is a state-by-state list of more than 250 of the West’s that climate is changing even faster than we outstanding streams, some protected, some still vulnerable. The feared, it becomes essential that we create Great Rivers of the West is a new type of inventory to serve the sanctuaries on our best, most natural rivers modern needs of river conservation—a list that Western Rivers that will harbor viable populations of at-risk Conservancy can use to strategically inform its work. species—not only charismatic species like salmon, but a broad range of aquatic and This is one of 11 state chapters in the report. Also available are a terrestrial species. summary of the entire report, as well as the full report text. That is what we do at Western Rivers Conservancy. We buy land With the right tools in hand, Western Rivers Conservancy is to create sanctuaries along the most outstanding rivers in the West seizing once-in-a-lifetime opportunities to acquire and protect – places where fish, wildlife and people can flourish. precious streamside lands on some of America’s finest rivers. With a talented team in place, combining more than 150 years This is a time when investment in conservation can yield huge of land acquisition experience and offices in Oregon, Colorado, dividends for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Report: Grand Staircase-Escalante National
    CONTENTS 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 1 2 Scoping Process ....................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Purpose of Scoping ........................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Scoping Outreach .............................................................................................................................. 3 2.2.1 Publication of the Notice of Intent ....................................................................................... 3 2.2.2 Other Outreach Methods ....................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Opportunities for Public Comment ................................................................................................ 3 2.4 Public Scoping Meetings .................................................................................................................. 4 2.5 Cooperating Agency Involvement ................................................................................................... 4 2.6 National Historic Preservation Act and Tribal Consultation ....................................................... 5 3 Submission Processing and Comment Coding .................................................................................... 5
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Canyon National Park U.S
    National Park Service Grand Canyon National Park U.S. Department of the Interior The official newspaper North Rim 2015 Season The Guide North Rim Information and Maps Roosevelt Point, named for President Theodore Roosevelt who in 1908, declared Grand Canyon a national monument. Grand Canyon was later established as a national park in 1919 by President Woodrow Wilson. Welcome to Grand Canyon S ITTING ATOP THE K AIBAB a meadow, a mother turkey leading her thunderstorms, comes and goes all too flies from the South Rim, the North Plateau, 8,000 to 9,000 feet (2,400– young across the road, or a mountain quickly, only to give way to the colors Rim offers a very different visitor 2,750 m) above sea level with lush lion slinking off into the cover of the of fall. With the yellows and oranges of experience. Solitude, awe-inspiring green meadows surrounded by a mixed forest. Visitors in the spring may see quaking aspen and the reds of Rocky views, a slower pace, and the feeling of conifer forest sprinkled with white- remnants of winter in disappearing Mountain maple, the forest seems to going back in time are only a few of the barked aspen, the North Rim is an oasis snowdrifts or temporary mountain glow. Crispness in the air warns of winter many attributes the North Rim has in the desert. Here you may observe lakes of melted snow. The summer, snowstorms soon to come. Although to offer. Discover the uniqueness of deer feeding, a coyote chasing mice in with colorful wildflowers and intense only 10 miles (16 km) as the raven Grand Canyon’s North Rim.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of UTAH DEPARTMENT of NATURAL RESOURCES Technical
    STATE OF UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Technical Publication No. 70 GROUND-WATER CONDITIONS IN THE UPPER VIRGIN RIVER AND KANAB CREEK BASINS AREA, UTAH, WITH EMPHASIS ON THE NAVAJO SANDSTONE by R. M. Cordova Hydrologist, U.S. Geological Survey Prepared by the United States Geological Survey in cooperation with The Utah Department of Natural Resources Division of Water Rights 1981 CONTENTS Page Conversion factors VI Abstract 1 Introduction 2 Purpose and scope of the study.................................... 2 Previous studies and acknowledgments 2 Data-site-numbering system........................................ 3 Location and general features of the study area 3 Physiography and drainage 3 Climate 6 CuI ture and economy 9 Geologic setting 9 General characteristics of the rocks 9 General geologic structure 11 Water resources 11 Precipitation 11 Surface water 13 Runoff 13 Chemical quality 13 Ground water 16 General conditions of occurrence 16 Unconsolidated-rock aquifers 17 Consolidated-rock aquifers 19 Hydrologic properties of aquifers 20 Recharge 27 Movement 28 Discharge 30 Seepage to streams 31 Evapotranspiration 31 Springs 33 Wells 35 Subsurface outflow 36 Storage 37 Chemical quality 41 General characteristics 41 Relation to use 47 Public supply 47 Irrigation supply 47 Temperature 49 Possible hydrologic effects of increased ground-water development 50 Interference with existing wells .......................•.......... 50 Shift of the ground-water divide 55 Reduction of streamflow 56 Effects on chemical quality of water 56 Summary and conclusions 57 References cited 59 Publications of the Utah Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Rights 78 III ILLUSTRATIONS [Plates are in pocket] Plate 1. Map showing selected geohydrologic information in the upper Virgin River basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantifying the Base Flow of the Colorado River: Its Importance in Sustaining Perennial Flow in Northern Arizona And
    1 * This paper is under review for publication in Hydrogeology Journal as well as a chapter in my soon to be published 2 master’s thesis. 3 4 Quantifying the base flow of the Colorado River: its importance in sustaining perennial flow in northern Arizona and 5 southern Utah 6 7 Riley K. Swanson1* 8 Abraham E. Springer1 9 David K. Kreamer2 10 Benjamin W. Tobin3 11 Denielle M. Perry1 12 13 1. School of Earth and Sustainability, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, US 14 email: [email protected] 15 2. Department of Geoscience, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, US 16 3. Kentucky Geological Survey, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, US 17 *corresponding author 18 19 Abstract 20 Water in the Colorado River is known to be a highly over-allocated resource, yet decision makers fail to consider, in 21 their management efforts, one of the most important contributions to the existing water in the river, groundwater. This 22 failure may result from the contrasting results of base flow studies conducted on the amount of streamflow into the 23 Colorado River sourced from groundwater. Some studies rule out the significance of groundwater contribution, while 24 other studies show groundwater contributing the majority flow to the river. This study uses new and extant 1 25 instrumented data (not indirect methods) to quantify the base flow contribution to surface flow and highlight the 26 overlooked, substantial portion of groundwater. Ten remote sub-basins of the Colorado Plateau in southern Utah and 27 northern Arizona were examined in detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Paria Canyon Vermilion Cliffs Wilderness Management Plan
    01\16• ,.J ~ UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR -- BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT ~Lf 1.,.J/ t'CI/C w~P 0 ARIZONA STRIP FIELD OFFICE/KANAB RESOURCE AREA PARIA CANYONNERMILION CLIFFS WILDERNESS MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EA-AZ-01 0-97-16 I. INTRODUCTION The Paria Canyon - Vermilion Cliffs Wilderness Area contains 112,500 acres (92,500 acres in Coconino County, Arizona and 20,000 acres in Kane County, Utah) of public lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management. The area is approximately 10 to 30 miles west of Page, Arizona. Included are 35 miles of the Paria river Canyon, 15 miles of the Buckskin Gulch, Coyote Buttes, and the Vermilion Cliffs from Lee's Ferry to House Rock Valley (Map 1). The Paria Canyon, Buckskin Gulch, Wire Pass, and the Coyote Buttes Special Management Area are part of the larger Paria Canyon-Vermilion Cliffs Wilderness, designated in August 1984 (Map 2). Existing management plan guidance is to protect primitive, natural conditions and the many outstanding opportunities for hiking, backpacking, photographing, or viewing in the seven different highly scenic geologic formations from which the canyons and buttes are carved. Visitor use in Paria Canyon, Buckskin Gulch, and Coyote Buttes has increased from 2,400 visits in Fiscal Year (FY) 1986 to nearly 10,000 visits in FY96-a 375% increase in use over 10 years. This increased use, combined with the narrow nature of the canyons, small camping terraces, and changing visitor use patterns, is impacting the wilderness character of these areas. Human waste, overcrowding, and public safety have become important issues.
    [Show full text]
  • FISH of the COLORADO RIVER Colorado River and Tributaries Between Glen Canyon Dam and Lake Mead
    FISH OF THE COLORADO RIVER Colorado River and tributaries between Glen Canyon Dam and Lake Mead ON-LINE TRAINING: DRAFT Outline: • Colorado River • Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (GCDAMP) • Native Fishes • Common Non-Native Fishes • Rare Non-Native Fishes • Standardized Sampling Protocol Colorado River: • The Colorado River through Grand Canyon historically hosted one of the most distinct fish assemblages in North America (lowest diversity, highest endemism) • Aquatic habitat was variable ▫ Large spring floods ▫ Cold winter temperatures ▫ Warm summer temperatures ▫ Heavy silt load • Today ▫ Stable flow releases ▫ Cooler temperatures ▫ Predation Overview: • The Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program was established in 1997 to address downstream ecosystem impacts from operation of Glen Canyon Dam and to provide research and monitoring of downstream resources. Area of Interest: from Glen Canyon Dam to Lake Mead Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (Fish) Goals: • Maintain or attain viable populations of existing native fish, eliminate risk of extinction from humpback chub and razorback sucker, and prevent adverse modification to their critical habitat. • Maintain a naturally reproducing population of rainbow trout above the Paria River, to the extent practicable and consistent with the maintenance of viable populations of native fish. Course Purpose: • The purpose of this training course “Fish of the Colorado River” is to provide a general overview of fish located within the Colorado River below Glen Canyon Dam downstream to Lake Mead and linked directly to the GCDAMP. • Also included are brief explanations of management concerns related to the native fish species, as well as species locations. Native Fishes: Colorado River and tributaries between Glen Canyon Dam and Lake Mead Bluehead Sucker • Scientific name: Catostomus discobolus • Status: Species of Special Concern (conservation status may be at risk) • Description: Streamlined with small scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Staircase-Escalante National‘ Monument Annual Manager’S Report—Fiscal Year 2016 Table of Contents
    Utah Grand Staircase-Escalante National‘ Monument Annual Manager’s Report—Fiscal Year 2016 Table of Contents Grand Staircase-Escalante Profile ..................................................................................... 2 Planning and NEPA ............................................................................................................. 6 2016 Projects and Accomplishments ................................................................................ 9 Science .............................................................................................................................. 35 Resources, Objects, Values, and Stressors ..................................................................... 57 Summary of Performance Measure ................................................................................. 84 Manager’s Letter ............................................................................................................... 88 1 1 Grand Staircase-Escalante Profile Designating Authority Designating Authority: Presidential Proclamation 6920 Date of Designation: September 18, 1996 Acreage Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument (GSENM) spans nearly 1.9 million acres of America’s public lands. Managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), GSENM is part of the National Conservation Lands. Reporting directly to the BLM Utah State Office, the Monument Manager oversees public lands which contain some of America’s most scientifically exciting and visually stunning landscapes. The Monument boundary encompasses
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 – Affected Environment
    Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan October 2016 Final Environmental Impact Statement 3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT Chapter 3 describes the environmental resources (physical, biological, cultural, recreational, and socioeconomic) that could be affected by the range of alternatives for implementing the Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan (LTEMP), as described in Chapters 1 and 2. The extent to which each specific resource may be affected by each alternative is discussed in Chapter 4, Environmental Consequences.1 3.1 PROJECT AREA The project area includes the area potentially affected by implementation of the LTEMP (including normal management and experimental operations of Glen Canyon Dam and non-flow actions). This area includes Lake Powell, Glen Canyon Dam, and the river downstream to Lake Mead (Figure 3.1-1). More specifically, the scope primarily encompasses the Colorado River Ecosystem, which includes the Colorado River mainstream corridor and interacting resources in associated riparian and terrace zones, located primarily from the forebay of Glen Canyon Dam to the western boundary of Grand Canyon National Park (GCNP). It includes the area where dam operations impact physical, biological, recreational, cultural, and other resources. This section of the river runs through Glen, Marble, and Grand Canyons in Coconino and Mohave Counties in northwestern Arizona. Although this EIS focuses primarily on the Colorado River Ecosystem, the affected area varies by resources and extends outside of the immediate river corridor for some resources and cumulative impacts. Portions of Glen Canyon National Recreation Area (GCNRA), GCNP, and Lake Mead National Recreation Area (LMNRA) outside the Colorado River Ecosystem are also included in the affected region for certain resources due to the potential effects of LTEMP operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Trout in the Grand Canyon
    Trout in the Grand Canyon by David Epstein The tailwater section of the Colorado River below Glen Canyon Dam (GCD) is managed as a blue-ribbon trout fishery. While this tailwater section provides cold, clear water that is ideal for trout success, conditions below Lee’s Ferry are much less suitable for trout (Epstein, this volume, 2005). However, trout have been documented in the river all the way down to Lake Mead. Many accounts from researchers and river guides include the obvious presence of trout in the mainstem river. In fact, trout have been known to congregate at frequently used camp sites in search of human food discarded into the river. Although river conditions seem suitable for trout when the river runs clear, the Grand Canyon does not provide high quality trout habitat, especially when turbidity is high. The majority of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon is high velocity rapids and large eddies, which are not ideal habitat for trout. On the other hand, many of the tributaries to the mainstem provide more traditional riffle, run and pool habitats that are preferentially occupied by trout. Figure 1. Rainbow Trout caught in Kanab Creek close to the mouth (Wilson 2005). During our visit to Grand Canyon the Colorado River was extremely turbid due to sediment-rich inputs from the Little Colorado River. It is not understood how trout adapt to these prolongued periods of turbidity, but we hypothesized that they may find refuge in the warmer, clearwater tributaries. Trout are commonly known to greatly reduce their feeding attempts in highly turbid conditions (Valdez 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Salt Creek Canyon Access Plan Canyonlands National Park, Utah
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Canyonlands Research Bibliography Canyonlands Research Center 2002 Environmental Assessment : Middle Salt Creek Canyon Access Plan Canyonlands National Park, Utah National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior Canyonlands National Park Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/crc_research Part of the Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons Recommended Citation National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior and Canyonlands National Park, "Environmental Assessment : Middle Salt Creek Canyon Access Plan Canyonlands National Park, Utah" (2002). Canyonlands Research Bibliography. Paper 226. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/crc_research/226 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Canyonlands Research Center at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canyonlands Research Bibliography by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MIDDLE SALT CREEK CANYON ACCESS PLAN CANYONLANDS NATIONAL PARK, UTAH _______________________________________________________________________ Summary Salt Creek is the largest drainage in the Needles district of Canyonlands National Park. The creek supports one of the most important riparian ecosystems in the park. It is also the heart of the Salt Creek National Register Archeological District, the area with the highest recorded density of archeological sites in the park. A tributary canyon contains the spectacular Angel Arch, a well-known geologic formation that for many years has been a destination point for park visitors. In 1998 the U.S. District Court for the State of Utah ruled, in a lawsuit filed by the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, that the National Park Service violated the NPS Organic Act (16 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Canyon National Park: Kanab Creek, May 2016
    Grand Canyon National Park: Kanab Creek, May 2016 Greetings! We just returned from a four night backpack in Grand Canyon National Park - here's our trip report. Day 1 We began our hike at Jumpup Cabin. The road from Jacob Lake was no problem for our passenger car; a few rough spots and a hole behind the cattle grid at the beginning of FR 234 required careful driving, but we encountered no obstacles that would have required high clearance. We started out in the afternoon and hiked down Jumpup Canyon. A trail leads down to Upper Jumpup Spring, and after that we followed the wash. It took us 2.5 hours to cover the 4.5 miles to Lower Jumpup Spring, and a few times we had to seek shelter from rain. We camped on a bench above the wash, a little bit above the spring. From our tent we could see the moon rise above the cliffs. Day 2 The next day began with climbing down the jump-up. A bolt on the ledge above the jump-up makes it easy to belay and lower packs. The climb down the ramp was not as scary as it looked from above, and the rickety looking ladder is actu- ally quite stable. We followed Jumpup Canyon downstream, over beautiful slick rock steps with many little pour offs. The stream vanishes after a while, but there was running water at the mouth of Sowats Canyon—the last water source for the next five hours. Shortly below Kwagunt Hollow, an hour of walking since the jumpup, we entered the limestone slot canyon.
    [Show full text]