Recent Vegetation Changes Along the Colorado River Between Glen

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Recent Vegetation Changes Along the Colorado River Between Glen Recent Vegetation Changes Along the Colorado River Between Glen Canyon Dam and Lake Mead, Arizona Recent Vegetation Changes Along the Colorado River Between Glen Canyon Dam and Lake Mead, Arizona By RAYMOND M. TURNER and MARTIN M. KARPISCAK GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1132 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1980 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY H. William Menard, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Turner, Raymond M. Recent vegetation changes along the Colorado River between Glen Canyon Dam and Lake Mead, Arizona. (Geological Survey professional paper ; 1132) Bibliography: p. 22-24. 1. Botany-Arizona-Ecology. 2. Botany-Colorado Valley-Ecology. 3. Vegetation dynamics-Arizona. 4. Vegetation dynamics-Colorado Valley. I. Karpiscak, Martin M., joint author. II. Title. III. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Professional Paper ; 1132. QK147.T87 581.5 79-25928 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-03269-4 CONTENTS Page Page List of common plant names and scientific equivalents ________ IV Distribution of major plant species—Continued Abstract _______________________________________ 1 Rabbitbrush ______________________________16 Introduction ____________________________________ 1 Desert broom._______________-________16 Acknowledgments ____________________________________ 3 Waterweed ______________—____________ ————— _17 Changes in Colorado River streamflow regime ________ 3 Seep willow __________——— ——— ——— ______ —— —— _17 Floods _________________________________ 3 Emory seep willow __________________ ____17 Daily stage.__________________________ 6 Apache plume _________________________________17 Annual discharge_________________________ 7 Netleaf hackberry __________________________ ———17 Monthly discharge __________ _______________________? Redbud ________________________________________—17 Changes in channel and alluvial deposits in the Colorado Cattail________________________________17 River below Glen Canyon Dam ______________________ 8 Reed——___________________________ _________________ -18 A history of photography on the Colorado River __________ 10 Spiny aster________________________ ————— ___18 Vegetation _______________________________________12 Sandbar willow _______________ —— ——— __ — _ ————— _18 Distribution of major plant species ___________________13 Goodding willow _______________________-18 Bermuda grass ________________________________14 Desert isocoma ____________________— —— ———18 Russian olive __________________________________14 Photographic documentation of changes ____———__ ——— ———18 Saltcedar____________________________________ 14 Summary of changes ______________________19 Elm __________________________________15 Zone of postdam fluvial sediments ____________—19 Camelthorn _________________________________15 Zone of predam fluvial sediments _______________—_19 Catclaw _________________________________15 Zone of predam flood terraces, eolian deposits, and Western honey mesquite ____________________15 stabilized talus slopes __________________21 Fremont cottonwood ____________________________16 General conclusion ____________________—-21 Arrowweed____________________ _____________16 References cited __________________- — ————— -22 Longleafbrickellia __________________________________ 16 ILLUSTRATIONS Page PLATE 1. Map showing Colorado River from Glen Canyon Dam to Lake Mead. _____________________ — — —— ___In pocket 2. Maps showing distribution of selected plant species along the Colorado River. [Includes figs. 7-15.] ___ ————In pocket 3. Maps showing distribution of selected plant species along the Colorado River. [Includes figs. 16-25.] _ —— — __In pocket FIGURE 1. Graph showing yearly range between minimum daily and maximum discharge and yearly range between minimum and maximum stage of Colorado River at Lees Ferry and near Grand Canyon _______-_ ——— — 4 2. Graph showing daily variation in river stage during two selected years, Colorado River at Lees Ferry ___ ——— ——— 6 3. Graph showing total annual streamflow (by calendar year) of Colorado River as recorded at Lees Ferry and near Grand Canyon ______________________________________- ——— ———— 7 4. Graph showing mean monthly discharge as a percentage of total annual discharge, Colorado River, Lees Ferry _ ___ 8 5. Graph showing regression analyses of annual (water year) discharge versus sediment yield _______ — — ———— _ 9 6. Graph showing accumulated volume of degradation below Glen Canyon Dam for various periods between 1956 and 1975 _____________________________________________________-______ 10 7-25. Maps showing distribution of selected plant species along the Colorado River from Glen Canyon Dam to Lake Mead: 7. Bermuda grass and elm ________________________ ———— ———————— ——— ——— _- —— -Plate 2 8. Russian olive and desert broom __________________________~——— — — — ———— - ——Plate 2 9. Saltcedar _________________________________________________________________——————-—Plate 2 10. Camelthorn and Apache plume ________________________ ——— ———————————————Plate 2 11. Catclaw._________________________________________________————————Plate 2 12. Western honey mesquite _____ _____________________ _———————————————————Plate 2 13. Fremont cottonwood __________________________________________———————Plate 2 14. Arrowweed ____________________________________________—————————————Plate 2 15. Longleaf brickellia ________________ ________________________________ ______________________—_„__ Plate 2 16. Rabbitbrush and waterweed _____________________—_ ——— ______ ——————— ____—Plate 3 III IV CONTENTS FIGURE 17. Seep willow _______________________________________________________Plate 3 18. Emory seep willow ______________________________________ _______________Plate 3 19. Netleaf hackberry ___________________________________________________________Plate 3 20. Redbud and desert isocoma _____________________________________________ ——— __————Plate 3 21. Cattail ______________________________________________________________Plate 3 22. Reed ___________________ ________________________________________Plate 3 23. Spiny aster _________________________________________________________Plate 3 24. Sandbar willow _____________._________________________ _______________Plate 3 25. Goodding willow ______________________________________________________Plate 3 26-73. Matched photographs showing changes in vegetation ___________________________— — — __ — — ____26-125 TABLES Page TABLE 1. Mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation of yearly maximum stage for the Colorado River at Lees Ferry and near Grand Canyon _________________________________________^________——— 5 2. Mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation of yearly minimum stage for the Colorado River at Lees Ferry and near Grand Canyon.________________________________ —— __ —— __ —— _ — _______ 5 3. Camera station descriptions, including dates, location, altitude, and photograph credits ——_____ —— ______ —— —— _ 20 LIST OF COMMON PLANT NAMES USED AND SCIENTIFIC EQUIVALENTS agave Agave spp. longleaf brickellia Brickellia longifolia Wats. Apache plume Fallugia paradoxa (D.Don) Endl. mistletoe Phoradendron californicum Nutt. arrowweed Pluchea sericea (Nutt.) Coville monkey flower Mimulus cardinalis Dougl. barrel cactus Ferocactus acanthodes (Lemaire) Britt. Mormon tea Ephedra trifurca Torr. & Rose netleaf hackberry Celtis reticulata Torr. beavertail cactus Opuntia basilaris Engelm. & Bigel. ocotillo Fouquieria splendens Engelm. bebbia Bebbia juncea (Benth.) Greene peppergrass Lepidium montanum Nutt. Bermuda grass Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. poison ivy Rhus radicans L. brittle bush Encelia farinosa Gray rabbitbrush Chysothamnus spp. camelthorn Alhagi camelorum Fisch. range ratany Krameria parvifolia Benth. carrizo (see reed) Phragmites communis Trin. red brome Bromus rubens L. catclaw Acacia greggii Gray redbud Cercis occidentalis Torr. cattail Typha spp. red willow Salix laevigata Bebb. coldenia Coldenia spp. reed (see carrizo) Phragmites communis Trin. creosote bush Larrea tridentata (DC.) Coville Russian olive Elaeagnus angustifolia L. desert broom Baccharis sarothroides Gray Russian thistle Salsola kali L. var. tenuifolia Tausch desert isocoma Haplopappus acradenius (Greene) Blake saltcedar Tamarix chinensis Lour. desert plume Stanleya pinnata (Pursh) Britton sandbar willow Salix exigua Nutt. desert trumpet Eriogonum inflation Torr. & Frem. sand verbena Abronia elliptica A. Nels. dicoria Dicoria spp. scouring rush Equisetum hiemale L. dogbane Apocynum spp. seepweed Suaeda torreyana Wats. dropseed Sporobolus spp. seep willow Baccharis glutinosa Pers. dyssodia Dyssodia spp. shrub liveoak Quercus turbinella Greene elm Ulmus minor Mill. slender poreleaf Porophyllum gracile Benth. Emory seep willow Baccharis emoryi Gray smooth horsetail Equisetum laevigatum A. Braun evening primrose Oenothera pallida Lindl. spiny aster Aster spinosus Benth. four-wing saltbush Atriplex canescens (Pursh) Nutt. watercress Rorippa nasturtium-aquaticum (L.) Fremont cottonwood Populus fremontii Wats. Schinz & Thell globemallow Sphaeralcea spp. waterweed Baccharis sergiloides Gray Goodding willow Salix gooddingii Ball western honey mesquite Prosopis glandulosa var. torreyana (Ben- great bulrush Scirpus validus Vahl. son) Johnston hackberry Celtis reticulata Torr. white bursage Ambrosia dumosa (A. Gray) Payne horsetail Equisetum spp. willow Salix
Recommended publications
  • Arizona TIM PALMER FLICKR
    Arizona TIM PALMER FLICKR Colorado River at Mile 50. Cover: Salt River. Letter from the President ivers are the great treasury of noted scientists and other experts reviewed the survey design, and biological diversity in the western state-specific experts reviewed the results for each state. RUnited States. As evidence mounts The result is a state-by-state list of more than 250 of the West’s that climate is changing even faster than we outstanding streams, some protected, some still vulnerable. The feared, it becomes essential that we create Great Rivers of the West is a new type of inventory to serve the sanctuaries on our best, most natural rivers modern needs of river conservation—a list that Western Rivers that will harbor viable populations of at-risk Conservancy can use to strategically inform its work. species—not only charismatic species like salmon, but a broad range of aquatic and This is one of 11 state chapters in the report. Also available are a terrestrial species. summary of the entire report, as well as the full report text. That is what we do at Western Rivers Conservancy. We buy land With the right tools in hand, Western Rivers Conservancy is to create sanctuaries along the most outstanding rivers in the West seizing once-in-a-lifetime opportunities to acquire and protect – places where fish, wildlife and people can flourish. precious streamside lands on some of America’s finest rivers. With a talented team in place, combining more than 150 years This is a time when investment in conservation can yield huge of land acquisition experience and offices in Oregon, Colorado, dividends for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gila and Little Colorado General Stream Adjudications
    THE GILA AND LITTLE COLORADO GENERAL STREAM ADJUDICATIONS Cynthia M. Chandley 1 ©© 2014 2014 Snell Snell & & Wilmer Wilmer Arizona’s Watersheds 2 © 2014 Snell & Wilmer Scope of Adjudications Gila Adjudication Little Colorado River Adjudication 30,000 5,000 SOCs SOCs Claimants 85,000 14,000 Claimants 3 © 2014 Snell & Wilmer Initiation of Arizona’s Adjudications SRP initiates U.S. Supreme Court Phelps Dodge Verde River Buckeye Irrigation decides jurisdiction in on- initiates Little Adjudication District intervenes going state adjudications. Colorado River Ariz. v. San Carlos Adjudication Apache Tribe (U.S. 1983) 1974 1976 1978 1979 1980 1981 1983 1985 Arizona Supreme SRP initiates Phelps Dodge initiates Court consolidates Salt River Gila River Adjudication Arizona Arizona Supreme Court Gila River cases Adjudication Adjudication statues decides state jurisdiction ASARCO initiates San revised over federal and Indian Pedro River Adjudication water rights. U.S. v. Superior Court (Ariz. 1985) 4 © 2014 Snell & Wilmer Maricopa County Court Proceedings • 1986 – Judge Goodfarb issues Pretrial Order No. 1 • 1990 – Arizona Supreme Court grants interlocutory review of six key issues 5 © 2014 Snell & Wilmer Arizona Supreme Court Rulings • Issue 1: Service of process – Gila I (1992) • Issue 2: Subflow – Gila II (1993) & Gila IV (2000) • Issue 3: Indian reserved water rights – Gila V (2001) • Issues 4 & 5: Federal reserved groundwater rights – Gila III (1999) • Issue 6: To be decided. 6 © 2014 Snell & Wilmer Major Adjudication Issues Subflow Trial No. 1; Adjudication Gila III and San Subflow Order Carlos Apache Court defines ADWR Subflow defines saturated Tribe, et al. v. ADWR Subflow 50%/90-day test Technical Report floodplain Holocene Superior Court Delineation ADWR Revised alluvium and evidentiary Report Subflow Report hearing 1986 1988 1993 1994 1995 1999 2000 2002 2005 2009 2012 2014 2014 2012 20142014 Pretrial Order Gila IV – affirms Gila II: rejects Subflow Subflow trial No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Little Colorado River Project: Is New Hydropower Development the Key to a Renewable Energy Future, Or the Vestige of a Failed Past?
    COLORADO NATURAL RESOURCES, ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REVIEW The Little Colorado River Project: Is New Hydropower Development the Key to a Renewable Energy Future, or the Vestige oF a Failed Past? Liam Patton* Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 42 I. THE EVOLUTION OF HYDROPOWER ON THE COLORADO PLATEAU ..... 45 A. Hydropower and the Development of Pumped Storage .......... 45 B. History of Dam ConstruCtion on the Plateau ........................... 48 C. Shipping ResourCes Off the Plateau: Phoenix as an Example 50 D. Modern PoliCies for Dam and Hydropower ConstruCtion ...... 52 E. The Result of Renewed Federal Support for Dams ................. 53 II. HYDROPOWER AS AN ALLY IN THE SHIFT TO CLEAN POWER ............ 54 A. Coal Generation and the Harms of the “Big Buildup” ............ 54 B. DeCommissioning Coal and the Shift to Renewable Energy ... 55 C. The LCR ProjeCt and “Clean” Pumped Hydropower .............. 56 * J.D. Candidate, 2021, University oF Colorado Law School. This Note is adapted From a final paper written for the Advanced Natural Resources Law Seminar. Thank you to the Colorado Natural Resources, Energy & Environmental Law Review staFF For all their advice and assistance in preparing this Note For publication. An additional thanks to ProFessor KrakoFF For her teachings on the economic, environmental, and Indigenous histories of the Colorado Plateau and For her invaluable guidance throughout the writing process. I am grateFul to share my Note with the community and owe it all to my professors and classmates at Colorado Law. COLORADO NATURAL RESOURCES, ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REVIEW 42 Colo. Nat. Resources, Energy & Envtl. L. Rev. [Vol. 32:1 III. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF PLATEAU HYDROPOWER ...............
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Fishing Regulations 3 Fishing License Fees Getting Started
    2019 & 2020 Fishing Regulations for your boat for your boat See how much you could savegeico.com on boat | 1-800-865-4846insurance. | Local Offi ce geico.com | 1-800-865-4846 | Local Offi ce See how much you could save on boat insurance. Some discounts, coverages, payment plans and features are not available in all states or all GEICO companies. Boat and PWC coverages are underwritten by GEICO Marine Insurance Company. GEICO is a registered service mark of Government Employees Insurance Company, Washington, D.C. 20076; a Berkshire Hathaway Inc. subsidiary. TowBoatU.S. is the preferred towing service provider for GEICO Marine Insurance. The GEICO Gecko Image © 1999-2017. © 2017 GEICO AdPages2019.indd 2 12/4/2018 1:14:48 PM AdPages2019.indd 3 12/4/2018 1:17:19 PM Table of Contents Getting Started License Information and Fees ..........................................3 Douglas A. Ducey Governor Regulation Changes ...........................................................4 ARIZONA GAME AND FISH COMMISSION How to Use This Booklet ...................................................5 JAMES S. ZIELER, CHAIR — St. Johns ERIC S. SPARKS — Tucson General Statewide Fishing Regulations KURT R. DAVIS — Phoenix LELAND S. “BILL” BRAKE — Elgin Bag and Possession Limits ................................................6 JAMES R. AMMONS — Yuma Statewide Fishing Regulations ..........................................7 ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT Common Violations ...........................................................8 5000 W. Carefree Highway Live Baitfish
    [Show full text]
  • West Colorado River Plan
    Section 9 - West Colorado River Basin Water Planning and Development 9.1 Introduction 9-1 9.2 Background 9-1 9.3 Water Resources Problems 9-7 9.4 Water Resources Demands and Needs 9-7 9.5 Water Development and Management Alternatives 9-13 9.6 Projected Water Depletions 9-18 9.7 Policy Issues and Recommendations 9-19 Figures 9-1 Price-San Rafael Salinity Control Project Map 9-6 9-2 Wilderness Lands 9-11 9-3 Potential Reservoir Sites 9-16 9-4 Gunnison Butte Mutual Irrigation Project 9-20 9-5 Bryce Valley 9-22 Tables 9-1 Board of Water Resources Development Projects 9-3 9-2 Salinity Control Project Approved Costs 9-7 9-3 Wilderness Lands 9-8 9-4 Current and Projected Culinary Water Use 9-12 9-5 Current and Projected Secondary Water Use 9-12 9-6 Current and Projected Agricultural Water Use 9-13 9-7 Summary of Current and Projected Water Demands 9-14 9-8 Historical Reservoir Site Investigations 9-17 Section 9 West Colorado River Basin - Utah State Water Plan Water Planning and Development 9.1 Introduction The coordination and cooperation of all This section describes the major existing water development projects and proposed water planning water-related government agencies, and development activities in the West Colorado local organizations and individual River Basin. The existing water supplies are vital to water users will be required as the the existence of the local communities while also basin tries to meet its future water providing aesthetic and environmental values.
    [Show full text]
  • Control of Erosion on Construction Sites
    624 RAN:c COf'<-\ I A LIBRARY PLANNING AND EP CONTROL OF EROSION ON CONSTRUCTION SITES By Michael J. Ransom CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 7 1 CONTROL OF EROSION ON CONSTRUCTION SITES 9 1.1 General 9 1 .2 How Does Erosion Occur? 9 2. BENEFITS OF EROSION CONTROL ON CONSTRUCTION SITES 11 3. PRINCIPLES OF EROSION CONTROL ON CONSTRUCTION SITES 12 3.1 Planning Phase Controls 12 3.2 Design and Construction Phase Controls 13 3.3 Maintenance Phase Controls 14 4. CONSTRUCTION SITE PRACTICE 15 4.1 Initial Clearing and Site Preparation 15 4.2 Access Around the Site 16 4.3 Drainage 19 4.4 Stockpiles and Spoil Dumps 30 4.5 Vegetation and Reclamation 31 4.6 Batters 34 4.7 SedimentTrapping 37 APPENDIX 1. Construction Supervisor's Check List 46 APPENDIX 2. Conservation, Forestsand Lands 47 Regional Offices REFERENCES 48 f l � t. tf.· . ' f•-':·.· . · . I . ACKNOWLEDGMENTS (First Edition) A number of people have assisted in the preparation of this booklet, both in technical advice and in reviewing the text. Particular thanks are due to a number of officers of the Soil Conservation Authority, particularly Mr. Graydon Findlay, the Authority's Chief Engineer. Also, the assistance of the following is greatly appreciated: Mr. John Mapson, State Rivers and Water Supply Commission, Messrs. Cliff Lawton and Peter Nash of the Road Construction Authority, and Mr. Don Thomson and his staff of the Dandenong Valley Authority who assisted greatly in providing technical input and advice on the presentation of the booklet. INTRODUCTION Each year, an increasing area of agricultural and open land is converted to urban use for houses, shopping centres, factories, roads, schools and other facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Floating the Dirty Devil River
    The best water levels and time Wilderness Study Areas (WSA) of year to float the Dirty Devil The Dirty Devil River corridor travels through two The biggest dilemma one faces when planning BLM Wilderness Study Areas, the Dirty Devil KNOW a float trip down the Dirty Devil is timing a WSA and the Fiddler Butte WSA. These WSA’s trip when flows are sufficient for floating. On have been designated as such to preserve their wil- BEFORE average, March and April are the only months derness characteristics including naturalness, soli- YOU GO: that the river is potentially floatable. Most tude, and primitive recreation. Please recreate in a people do it in May or June because of warm- manner that retains these characteristics. Floating the ing temperatures. It is recommended to use a hard walled or inflatable kayak when flows Dirty Devil are 100 cfs or higher. It can be done with “Leave-no-Trace” River flows as low as 65 cfs if you are willing to Proper outdoor ethics are expected of all visitors. drag your boat for the first few days. Motor- These include using a portable toilet when camping ized crafts are not allowed on this stretch of near a vehicle, using designated campgrounds The name "Dirty Devil" tells it river. when available, removing or burying human waste all. John Wesley Powell passed in the back country, carrying out toilet paper, using by the mouth of this stream on Another essential consideration for all visitors camp stoves in the backcountry, never cutting or his historic exploration of the is flash flood potential.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.6 Riverflow Issues
    AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES CHAPTER 3 3.6 RIVERFLOW ISSUES 3.6.1 INTRODUCTION This section considers the potential effects of interim surplus criteria on three types of releases from Glen Canyon Dam and Hoover Dam. The Glen Canyon Dam releases analyzed are those needed for restoration of beaches and habitat along the Colorado River between the Glen Canyon Dam and Lake Mead, and for a yet to be defined program of low steady summer flows to be provided for the study and recovery of endangered Colorado River fish, in years when releases from the dam are near the minimum. The Hoover Dam releases analyzed are the frequency of flood releases from the dam and the effect of flood flows along the river downstream of Hoover Dam. 3.6.2 BEACH/HABITAT-BUILDING FLOWS The construction and operation of Glen Canyon Dam has caused two major changes related to sediment resources downstream in Glen Canyon and Grand Canyon. The first is reduced sediment supply. Because the dam traps virtually all of the incoming sediment from the Upper Basin in Lake Powell, the Colorado River is now released from the dam as clear water. The second major change is the reduction in the high water zone from the level of pre-dam annual floods to the level of powerplant releases. Thus, the height of annual sediment deposition and erosion has been reduced. During the investigations leading to the preparation of the Operation of Glen Canyon Dam Final EIS (Reclamation, 1995b), the relationships between releases from the dam and downstream sedimentation processes were brought sharply into focus, and flow patterns designed to conserve sediment for building beaches and habitat (i.e., beach/habitat-building flow, or BHBF releases) were identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcgrath State Beach Plants 2/14/2005 7:53 PM Vascular Plants of Mcgrath State Beach, Ventura County, California by David L
    Vascular Plants of McGrath State Beach, Ventura County, California By David L. Magney Scientific Name Common Name Habit Family Abronia maritima Red Sand-verbena PH Nyctaginaceae Abronia umbellata Beach Sand-verbena PH Nyctaginaceae Allenrolfea occidentalis Iodinebush S Chenopodiaceae Amaranthus albus * Prostrate Pigweed AH Amaranthaceae Amblyopappus pusillus Dwarf Coastweed PH Asteraceae Ambrosia chamissonis Beach-bur S Asteraceae Ambrosia psilostachya Western Ragweed PH Asteraceae Amsinckia spectabilis var. spectabilis Seaside Fiddleneck AH Boraginaceae Anagallis arvensis * Scarlet Pimpernel AH Primulaceae Anemopsis californica Yerba Mansa PH Saururaceae Apium graveolens * Wild Celery PH Apiaceae Artemisia biennis Biennial Wormwood BH Asteraceae Artemisia californica California Sagebrush S Asteraceae Artemisia douglasiana Douglas' Sagewort PH Asteraceae Artemisia dracunculus Wormwood PH Asteraceae Artemisia tridentata ssp. tridentata Big Sagebrush S Asteraceae Arundo donax * Giant Reed PG Poaceae Aster subulatus var. ligulatus Annual Water Aster AH Asteraceae Astragalus pycnostachyus ssp. lanosissimus Ventura Marsh Milkvetch PH Fabaceae Atriplex californica California Saltbush PH Chenopodiaceae Atriplex lentiformis ssp. breweri Big Saltbush S Chenopodiaceae Atriplex patula ssp. hastata Arrowleaf Saltbush AH Chenopodiaceae Atriplex patula Spear Saltbush AH Chenopodiaceae Atriplex semibaccata Australian Saltbush PH Chenopodiaceae Atriplex triangularis Spearscale AH Chenopodiaceae Avena barbata * Slender Oat AG Poaceae Avena fatua * Wild
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Science
    Watershed Science This lesson is part of an ongoing monthly series that encourages young adults to learn about the environment through hands-on activities. These activities are recommended for ages 8+ and are designed using materials that most households have on-hand. Where does water come from? Why is it important? What is a watershed? This month, we will explore how water moves on Earth, what a watershed is and why it’s important, and find out what watershed area we live in! Did you know that the water we use today is the same water the dinosaurs used! So how does it move around the earth? Let's find out by making our own model of the water cycle! Model Water Cycle Materials: ❏ 1-quart sized freezer bag ❏ 1 permanent marker ❏ 1 cup of water ❏ Tape *recommend using clear packing tape ❏ Blue Food Coloring *recommended but not necessary ❏ Nature Journal (Click here for activity sheet) Directions: 1. Using a permanent marker, draw a water scene on the outside of the bag including water/waves at the bottom of the bag and clouds and the sun at the top of the bag. 2. Fill the measuring cup with 1 cup of water and add 2 drops of blue food coloring. Carefully stir in food coloring. 3. Slowly pour the water into the freezer bag and seal the bag completely. 4. Tape bag to a sunny window using tape. Choose a window that gets the most sunlight during the day. 5. Check on the bag during the day/several times a day and observe the changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado River Compact, 1922
    Colorado River Compact, 1922 The States of Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming, having resolved to enter into a compact under the Act of the Congress of the United States of America approved August 19, 1921 (42 Statutes at Large, page 171), and the Acts of the Legislatures of the said States, have through their Governors appointed as their Commissioners: W.S. Norviel for the State of Arizona, W.F. McClure for the State of California, Delph E. Carpenter for the State of Colorado, J.G. Scrugham for the State of Nevada, Stephen B. Davis, Jr., for the State of New Mexico, R.E. Caldwell for the State of Utah, Frank C. Emerson for the State of Wyoming, who, after negotiations participated in by Herbert Hoover appointed by The President as the representative of the United States of America, have agreed upon the following articles: ARTICLE I The major purposes of this compact are to provide for the equitable division and apportionment of the use of the waters of the Colorado River System; to establish the relative importance of different beneficial uses of water, to promote interstate comity; to remove causes of present and future controversies; and to secure the expeditious agricultural and industrial development of the Colorado River Basin, the storage of its waters, and the protection of life and property from floods. To these ends the Colorado River Basin is divided into two Basins, and an apportionment of the use of part of the water of the Colorado River System is made to each of them with the provision that further equitable apportionments may be made.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for the USA (W7A
    Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) Summits on the Air U.S.A. (W7A - Arizona) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S53.1 Issue number 5.0 Date of issue 31-October 2020 Participation start date 01-Aug 2010 Authorized Date: 31-October 2020 Association Manager Pete Scola, WA7JTM Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Document S53.1 Page 1 of 15 Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) TABLE OF CONTENTS CHANGE CONTROL....................................................................................................................................... 3 DISCLAIMER................................................................................................................................................. 4 1 ASSOCIATION REFERENCE DATA ........................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Program Derivation ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 General Information ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Final Ascent
    [Show full text]