48527.01 Bceaif

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

48527.01 Bceaif CONNECTIVITY CONTENT COMMERCE > BELL CANADA ENTERPRISES > ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM > For the year ended December 31, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2000 March 9, 2001 Documents incorporated by reference . 2 BCE Emergis . 23 Trade-marks . 2 General . 23 Item 1 • Corporate Structure of BCE . 3 Recent Developments . 24 Item 2 • General Development of BCE . 3 Competition . 24 Overview . 3 BCE Ventures . 24 Recent Developments . 3 BCI . 24 Item 3 • Businesses of BCE . 5 Telesat . 25 Bell Canada . 5 CGI . 26 General . 5 Excel . 26 Subsidiaries and Associated Companies . 7 Others . 26 Regulation . 8 Employees . 26 Competition . 12 Litigation . 26 Capital Expenditures . 15 Certain Contracts . 27 Environment . 15 Forward-Looking Statements . 27 Bell Globemedia . 16 Risk Factors . 28 General . 16 Item 4 • Selected Financial Information (Consolidated) . 36 CTV . 16 Item 5 • Management’s Discussion and Analysis . 36 Bell Globemedia Publishing . 16 Item 6 • Market for the Securities of BCE Inc. 36 Sympatico-Lycos . 16 Item 7 • Directors and Officers of BCE Inc. 36 Regulation . 17 Item 8 • Additional Information . 37 Competition . 17 Schedule . 38 Teleglobe . 18 General . 18 Global Network – GlobeSystem . 18 Regulation . 20 Competition . 22 Capital Expenditures . 23 2000 BCE Annual Information Form 1 Documents incorporated by reference Part of Annual Information Form Documents incorporated by reference 1. Portions of the BCE Inc. 2000 Annual Report Items 2, 5 and 6 2. Portions of the BCE Inc. Management Proxy Circular Item 7 Trade-marks Company Trade-mark BCE Inc. BCE Bell ActiMedia Inc. Sympatico Sympatico High Speed Edition Yellow Pages Yellowpages.ca Bell Canada Rings & Head Design (Bell Canada corporate logo) Bell Bell World BellZinc.ca Espace Bell Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership Vu! Bell Mobility Cellular Inc. Mobile Browser Manitoba Telecom Services Inc. First Rate Stentor Resource Centre Inc. Advantage, Advantage Optimum, Datapac, Dataroute, Megalink, Megaroute, Megastream, SmartTouch Teleglobe Inc. GlobeSystem Telesat Canada Anik, Nimiq TMI Communications and Company, Limited Partnership MSAT AT&T Corp. AT&T Hughes Electronics Corporation DirecPC Inktomi Corporation Inktomi International Telecommunications Satellite Organization INTELSAT MCI Communications Corporation Hyperstream National Hockey League NHL PanAmSat Corporation PanAmSat The Toronto Stock Exchange Inc. TSE Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! Any other trade-marks, corporate, trade or domain names used in this Annual Information Form are properties of their respective owners. 2 2000 BCE Annual Information Form ITEM 1 • CORPORATE STRUCTURE Globemedia; Teleglobe and BCE Emergis. All other non-core TELEGLOBE OF BCE businesses are combined in a new group called BCE Ventures. The Global Connectivity segment provides, on a world-wide basis, a broad portfolio of voice, data and Internet services BCE Inc. was incorporated in 1970, continued under the BELL CANADA including connectivity services to Internet service providers Canada Business Corporations Act in 1979 and exists under a The Canadian Connectivity segment provides an integrated (“ISPs”), Internet content providers, application service Restated Certificate of Incorporation dated December 1, 2000. platform of substantially domestic telecommunications ser- providers, carriers and global enterprises. This segment repre- BCE Inc. has its principal and registered offices at 1000, rue de vices including voice, data, wireline, wireless and directory sents the Teleglobe Communications group (“Teleglobe”), La Gauchetière Ouest, Bureau 3700, Montréal, Québec H3B communications as well as satellite entertainment to Cana- 23 per cent held by Bell Canada and 77 per cent held by BCE 4Y7. Unless the context indicates otherwise, “BCE” refers to BCE dian customers. This segment represents the consolidation of Inc. Teleglobe’s results are consolidated as of November 2000. Inc. and its subsidiaries. Unless otherwise indicated, the informa- Bell Canada Holdings Inc. (“BCH”) with Bell Canada and its tion in this Annual Information Form is disclosed as at December consolidated subsidiaries (including Bell Mobility Inc. (“Bell BCE EMERGIS 31, 2000. Mobility”), BCE Nexxia Inc. (carrying on business in Canada The Commerce segment represents BCE Emergis Inc. (“BCE The Schedule hereto presents certain subsidiaries and under the name Bell Nexxia), Bell ActiMedia Inc. (“Bell Acti- Emergis”), a business to business (“B2B”) e-commerce associates of BCE Inc., their respective jurisdictions of incor- Media”), Northern Telephone Limited (“Northern provider, strategically focusing on market leadership in the poration or continuance and the percentage of voting and Telephone”), Northwestel Inc. (“Northwestel”) and Télébec transaction-intensive eHealth and financial services sectors non-voting securities or partnership interests beneficially ltée (“Télébec”)), and its significantly influenced investments, through its three strategic business units (eHealth, Canadian owned or over which control or direction is exercised directly Manitoba Telecom Services Inc. (“MTS”) and Bell Intrigna Inc. and U.S.). BCE Inc. owns approximately 66 per cent of BCE or indirectly by BCE Inc. Certain subsidiaries, each of which (“Bell Intrigna”). BCE Inc. owns 80 per cent of BCH. The Emergis, with the remaining common shares being publicly represents not more than 10 per cent of consolidated assets remaining 20 per cent of BCH is held by SBC Communica- held. and not more than 10 per cent of consolidated sales and tions Inc. In addition, this segment includes the consolidation BCE VENTURES operating revenues of BCE Inc., and all of which, in the aggre- of Aliant Inc. (“Aliant”) (approximately 39 per cent held by The BCE Ventures group combines all the non-core businesses gate, represent not more than 20 per cent of total consolidated Bell Canada and approximately 14 per cent held by BCE Inc.) of BCE and reflects BCE’s interest in Bell Canada International assets and total consolidated sales and operating revenues of as well as BCE’s 100 per cent interest in Bell ExpressVu Limited Inc. (“BCI”), Telesat, CGI Group Inc. (“CGI”), Excel Commu- BCE Inc. at December 31, 2000, have been omitted. Partnership (“Bell ExpressVu”). Bell Canada provides a full nications, Inc. (“Excel”) and other BCE investments. range of communications services to customers, including ITEM 2 • GENERAL DEVELOPMENT wireline and wireless local and long distance telephone ser- Recent Developments OF BCE vices, Internet access, high speed data services and directories. On January 9, 2001, Bell Globemedia, a Canadian multi- Bell ExpressVu, a licenced direct-to-home (“DTH”) satellite Overview media company in the fields of broadcasting, print and the broadcaster, has been delivering, since 1997, television and Internet, was created as a result of the closing of the transac- BCE Inc. is Canada’s largest communications company. BCE radio channels of digital video and CD quality sound to Cana- tion originally announced on September 15, 2000, when BCE Inc. had, on a consolidated basis, revenues of $18.1 billion, net dian homes via Telesat Canada’s (“Telesat”) direct broadcast Inc., The Thomson Corporation (“Thomson”) and The Wood- earnings of $4.8 billion and cash flows from operating satellite (“DBS”). bridge Company Limited (“Woodbridge”) proposed the activities of $2.3 billion in 2000, and had total assets of BELL GLOBEMEDIA creation of a Canadian multi-media company. BCE Inc. owns $51.4 billion. BCE had approximately 75,000 employees at The Content segment provides integrated information, com- 70.1 per cent of Bell Globemedia and its principal contribu- December 31, 2000. munications and entertainment services to Canadian tions were its wholly-owned interest in CTV and its indirect BCE Inc. has among the largest number of registered share- customers and access to distinctive Canadian content that 71 per cent interest in Sympatico-Lycos. Thomson owns 20 holders of any Canadian corporation. At December 31, 2000, allows the creation of unique destinations for Internet users per cent of Bell Globemedia and contributed all of the assets there were more than 184,000 registered holders of common through various portal properties. This segment is comprised and undertakings of The Globe and Mail (division of Thom- shares, of whom about 95 per cent were registered as resident of BCE Inc.’s interest, through Bell Globemedia Inc. (“Bell son Canada Limited) and of Globe Interactive (division of in Canada and held approximately 86 per cent of the common Globemedia”), in CTV Inc. (“CTV”), The Globe and Mail, Thomson Canada Limited). Woodbridge owns 9.9 per cent of shares outstanding. Sympatico-Lycos Inc. (“Sympatico-Lycos”) and other media Bell Globemedia and contributed $385 million. Bell Globe- Effective December 1, 2000, BCE Inc. implemented a new interests. media’s initial capitalization was approximately $4 billion. operating structure following strategic acquisitions made On November 16, 2000, BCI, América Móvil S.A. de C.V. during the year. As a result, BCE Inc. centers its activities (“América Móvil”) and SBC International Inc. (“SBC Interna- around four operating business segments: Bell Canada; Bell tional”) announced the closing of the September 25, 2000 2000 BCE Annual Information Form 3 joint venture agreement and the formation of Telecom ever, Teleglobe Inc. stock option holders will receive, upon BCE Inc. 2000 Annual Report, which is filed concurrently with Américas Ltd. (“Telecom Américas”), a new facilities-based exercise of the options, 0.91 of a BCE Inc. common share for this document and.
Recommended publications
  • International Benchmarking of Australian Telecommunications International Services Benchmarking
    telecoms.qxd 9/03/99 10:06 AM Page 1 International Benchmarking of Australian Telecommunications International Services Benchmarking March 1999 Commonwealth of Australia 1999 ISBN 0 646 33589 8 This work is subject to copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, the work may be reproduced in whole or in part for study or training purposes, subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source. Reproduction for commercial use or sale requires prior written permission from AusInfo. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Manager, Legislative Services, AusInfo, GPO Box 1920, Canberra, ACT, 2601. Inquiries: Media and Publications Productivity Commission Locked Bag 2 Collins Street East Post Office Melbourne Vic 8003 Tel: (03) 9653 2244 Fax: (03) 9653 2303 Email: [email protected] An appropriate citation for this paper is: Productivity Commission 1999, International Benchmarking of Australian Telecommunications Services, Research Report, AusInfo, Melbourne, March. The Productivity Commission The Productivity Commission, an independent Commonwealth agency, is the Government’s principal review and advisory body on microeconomic policy and regulation. It conducts public inquiries and research into a broad range of economic and social issues affecting the welfare of Australians. The Commission’s independence is underpinned by an Act of Parliament. Its processes and outputs are open to public scrutiny and are driven by concern for the wellbeing of the community as a whole. Information on the Productivity Commission, its publications and its current work program can be found on the World Wide Web at www.pc.gov.au or by contacting Media and Publications on (03) 9653 2244.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDICES to the Evidence of Michael Piaskoski Rogers Communications Partnership
    EB-2015-0141 Ontario Energy Board IN THE MATTER OF the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998, S.O. 1998, c.15, (Schedule B); AND IN THE MATTER OF Decision EB-2013-0416/EB- 2014-0247 of the Ontario Energy Board (the “OEB”) issued March 12, 2015 approving distribution rates and charges for Hydro One Networks Inc. (“Hydro One”) for 2015 through 2017, including an increase to the Pole Access Charge; AND IN THE MATTER OF the Decision of the OEB issued April 17, 2015 setting the Pole Access Charge as interim rather than final; AND IN THE MATTER OF the Decision and Order issued June 30, 2015 by the OEB granting party status to Rogers Communications Partnership, Allstream Inc., Shaw Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., on behalf of itself and its affiliate, Cogeco Cable Canada LP, Quebecor Media, Bragg Communications, Packet-tel Corp., Niagara Regional Broadband Network, Tbaytel, Independent Telecommunications Providers Association (ITPA) and Canadian Cable Systems Alliance Inc. (CCSA) (collectively, the “Carriers”); AND IN THE MATTER OF Procedural Order No. 4 of the OEB issued October 26, 2015 setting dates for, inter alia, evidence of the Carriers. APPENDICES to the Evidence of Michael Piaskoski Rogers Communications Partnership November 20, 2015 EB-2015-0141 APPENDIX A to the Evidence of Michael Piaskoski Rogers Communications Partnership November 20, 2015 Michael E. Piaskoski SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS Eight years in Rogers Regulatory proceeded by 12 years as a telecom lawyer specializing in regulatory, competition and commercial matters. Bright, professional and ambitious performer who continually exceeds expectations. Expertise in drafting cogent, concise and easy-to-understand regulatory and legal filings and litigation materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Planning Document NPA 604 Numbering Relief
    Initial Planning Document NPA 604 Numbering Relief 250 604 CNA Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC Canada) July 27, 1999 As Presented on 24 September 1999 INITIAL PLANNING DOCUMENT NPA 604 NUMBERING RELIEF JULY 27, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 1 2. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 3. CENTRAL OFFICE CODE EXHAUST .................................................................................................... 2 4. CODE RELIEF METHODS...................................................................................................................... 3 4.1. Geographic Split.............................................................................................................................. 3 4.1.1. Definition ...................................................................................................................................... 3 4.1.2. General Attributes ........................................................................................................................ 4 4.2. Distributed Overlay .......................................................................................................................... 4 4.2.1. Definition .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PART a Definitions and General Terms 5 ITEM 100
    iTeraTEL Communications CRTC 15190 ACCESS SERVICES TARIFF Original Title Page ACCESS SERVICES TARIFF This Tariff sets out the rates, terms and conditions applicable to the interconnection arrangements provisioned to providers of telecommunications services and facilities. Issue Date: December 2,2019 Effective Date: January 15, 2015 Tariff Notice 1 iTeraTEL Communications Inc. CRTC 15190 ACCESS SERVICES TARIFF Original Page 1 Explanation of Symbols The following symbols are used in this Tariff and have meanings as shown: A Increase in rate or charge C Change in wording D Discontinued rate or regulation F Reformatting of existing material with no change to rate or charge M Matter moved from its previous location N New wording, rate or charge R Reduction in rate or charge S Reissued matter Abbreviations of Companies Names The following companies names are used in this Tariff and have meanings as shown: Aliant Aliant Telecom Inc. Bell Bell Canada Bell Aliant Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership IslandTel Island Telecom Inc. MTS MTS Allstream Inc. MTT Maritime Tel & Tel Limited NBTel NBTel NewTel NewTel Communications NorthernTel NorthernTel, Limited Partnership SaskTel SaskTel TBayTel TBayTel TCBC TELUS Communications Company, operating in British Columbia TCC TELUS Communications Company TCI TELUS Communications Company, operating in Alberta TCQ TELUS Communications Company, operating in Quebec Télébec Télébec, société en commandite Issue Date: December 2,2019 Effective Date: January 15, 2015 Tariff Notice 1 iTeraTEL Communications Inc. CRTC 15190 ACCESS SERVICES TARIFF Original Page 2 Check Page Issue Date: December 2, 2019 Effective Date: January 15, 2020 Tariff Notice 1 iTeraTEL Communications Inc. CRTC 15190 ACCESS SERVICES TARIFF Original Page 3 Table of Contents Page Explanation of Symbols 1 Abbreviations of Companies Names 1 Check Page 2 Table of Contents 3 PART A Definitions and General Terms 5 ITEM 100.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Telecom Meltdown for a Listing of Recent Titles in the Artech House Telecommunications Library, Turn to the Back of This Book
    The Great Telecom Meltdown For a listing of recent titles in the Artech House Telecommunications Library, turn to the back of this book. The Great Telecom Meltdown Fred R. Goldstein a r techhouse. com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record for this book is available from the U.S. Library of Congress. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Goldstein, Fred R. The great telecom meltdown.—(Artech House telecommunications Library) 1. Telecommunication—History 2. Telecommunciation—Technological innovations— History 3. Telecommunication—Finance—History I. Title 384’.09 ISBN 1-58053-939-4 Cover design by Leslie Genser © 2005 ARTECH HOUSE, INC. 685 Canton Street Norwood, MA 02062 All rights reserved. Printed and bound in the United States of America. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. All terms mentioned in this book that are known to be trademarks or service marks have been appropriately capitalized. Artech House cannot attest to the accuracy of this information. Use of a term in this book should not be regarded as affecting the validity of any trademark or service mark. International Standard Book Number: 1-58053-939-4 10987654321 Contents ix Hybrid Fiber-Coax (HFC) Gave Cable Providers an Advantage on “Triple Play” 122 RBOCs Took the Threat Seriously 123 Hybrid Fiber-Coax Is Developed 123 Cable Modems
    [Show full text]
  • Wireless Competition in Canada: an Assessment
    Volume 6•Issue 27•September 2013 WIRELESS COMPETITION IN CANADA: AN ASSESSMENT Jeffrey Church † Professor, Department of Economics and Director, Digital Economy Program, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary Andrew Wilkins † Research Associate, Digital Economy Program, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary SUMMARY If there’s one thing Canadians agree on, it’s that Canada’s wireless industry can and should be more competitive. The federal government is on side with the policy objective of having four carriers in every region and has responded with policies that provide commercial advantages to entrants. But, the rub is that there has not been a study that actually assesses the state of competition in wireless services in Canada, until now. Those in favour of policies that will promote and sustain entry point to Canada’s high average revenue per user and low wireless penetration rate (mobile connections per capita) as evidence that there is insufficient competition. The difficulty is that the facts are not consistent with this simplistic analysis. Measurements of wireless penetration are skewed toward countries that maintain the Calling Party Pays Protocol and favour pay-as-you-go plans, both of which encourage inflated user counts. Canada’s participation per capita on monthly plans and minutes of voice per capita are not outliers. Moreover, in terms of smartphone adoption and smartphone data usage, Canada is a global leader, contributing to high average revenue per user. Consistent with being world leaders in the rollout of high speed wireless networks, Canada lead its peer group in capital expenditures per subscriber in 2012: the competition of importance to Canadians is not just over price, but also over the quality of wireless networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Rogers Communications Inc
    Rogers Communications Inc. 333 Bloor Street East Toronto, Ontario M4W 1G9 rogers.com Tel.: 416.935.2525 Fax: 416.935.2523 [email protected] [email protected] Ken Engelhart Vice President - Regulatory February 7, 2008 Director, Spectrum Management Operations Radiocommunications and Broadcasting Regulatory Branch Industry Canada 300 Slater Street Ottawa, ON K1A 0C8 Sent via email: [email protected] Re: Reply Comments for Canada Gazette Notice No. DGRB-010-07 – Consultation on Proposed Conditions of Licence to Mandate Roaming and Antenna Tower and Site Sharing and to Prohibit Exclusive Site Arrangements, and Extension of the Application Date in Gazette Notice DGRB-011/07 – Licensing Framework for the Auction of Spectrum Licences for Advanced Wireless Services and other Spectrum in the 2GHz Range Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers) hereby submits our comments on the above- noted consultation. The documents are being sent in Adobe PDF Version 8.0. Operating System: Microsoft Windows XP. Yours very truly, Kenneth G. Engelhart Vice President – Regulatory KGE/csh Attachs. WIRELESS DIGITAL CABLE INTERNET HOME PHONE VIDEO PUBLISHING BROADCASTING Reply Comments of Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers) Canada Gazette Notice No. DGRB-010-07 Consultation on Proposed Conditions of Licence to Mandate Roaming and Antenna Tower and Site Sharing and to Prohibit Exclusive Site Arrangements Published in the Canada Gazette, Part 1 dated November 28, 2007 February 7, 2008 Canada Gazette Notice No. DGRB-010-07 Rogers Communications Inc. Executive Summary As explained in our comments dated January 22, 2008, Rogers submits that the Minister does not have the authority to amend Rogers’ existing conditions of licence.
    [Show full text]
  • Communications Network Builders Corporate Profile
    Communications Network Builders Corporate Profile Corporate Profile OUR HISTORY Founded in 1967, TELECON quickly established itself with itsits expertise in burying communication cablecabless and a technical service provider to industry leaders such as BBellellellell Canada. FFFromFrom the startstart,,,, TELECON stood out for ititss commitment to quality workmanshipworkmanship and on time deldeliveries.iveries. In the early 1970’s, TELECON widened its array of servicesservices by adding underground infrastructure construction and utility pole installation servicesservices.. Consequently it obtainobtainedededed thethethe contract to renew the entire aerial network of the Abitibi region installtallinginginging over 600 km of specialized cable. This later led to itsitsits diversification into television cacableble distribution and mandates to deploy communicationcommunication networks across the Province of Quebec. The 90’s wewerere markmarkeded by major technological and core business changeschanges in the teletelecommunicationcommunication industries. ThTheseese opportunities led us into specialized sectors suchsuch as wireless technology, optical networknetworkssss deployment, and switched networks supporting voice data and vivivideovi deo servicesservices.. TELECON is a unique partner, one that mastersmasters alalll the necessary elements for the construction of leading edge telecommunication and electrical netwonetworkrkrkssss.... TELECON services are available from coast to coast, using only qualified and certicertifiedfied personnel
    [Show full text]
  • BWA Reply Comments in Response to DGRB-018-99 March 22, 2000
    BWA Reply Comments in Response to DGRB-018-99 March 22, 2000 March 22, 2000 Mr. Michael Helm Director General Telecommunications Policy Regulatory Branch and Mr. Jan Skora Director General Radiocommunications and Broadcasting Branch Subject: Reply Comments – Canada Gazette Notice No. DGRB-018-99-- Consultation on the Proposed Policy and Licensing Procedures for the Auction of Additional Spectrum in the 2 GHz Frequency Rage (PCS – 2GHz) On behalf of the Bell Wireless Alliance, Bell Mobility is pleased to provide the attached reply in response to comments from other parties posted on the Department’s Strategis website. The Bell Wireless Alliance consists of Bell Mobility Inc., Island Telecom Inc., MTS Communications, MT&T Mobility Inc., NBTel Inc., NewTel Mobility Limited and Saskatchewan Telecommunications Holding Corporation. These reply comments have also been submitted electronically pursuant to the procedure outlined in the notice. Sincerely, Brian O’Shaughnessy, P.Eng Attachment BWA Reply Comments in Response to DGRB-018-99 March 22, 2000 Reply Comments — Canada Gazette Notice No. DGRB-018-99 Bell Wireless Alliance Reply Comments re: Notice No. DGRB-018-99 – Consultation on the Proposed Policy and Licensing Procedures for the Auction of PCS Spectrum in the 2 GHz Frequency Range (PCS – 2GHz) Published in the Canada Gazette, part 1 dated December 17, 1999 Submission by Bell Mobility Inc., Island Telecom Inc., MTS Communications Inc., MT&T Mobility Inc., NBTel Inc., NewTel Mobility Limited and Saskatchewan Telecommunications Holding Corporation 22 March 2000 BWA Reply Comments in Response to DGRB-018-99 March 22, 2000 Reply Comments – Canada Gazette Notice No. DGRB-018-99 Bell Wireless Alliance reply comments re: Notice No.
    [Show full text]
  • LIST of SECTION 13F SECURITIES ** PAGE 1 RUN TIME:09:57 Ivmool
    RUN DATE:06/29/00 ** LIST OF SECTION 13F SECURITIES ** PAGE 1 RUN TIME:09:57 IVMOOl CUSIP NO. ISSUER NAME ISSUER DESCRIPTION STATUS B49233 10 7 ICOS VISION SYS CORP N V ORD B5628B 10 4 * LERNOUT & HAUSPIE SPEECH PRODS COM B5628B 90 4 LERNOUT & HAUSPIE SPEECH PRODS CALL B5628B 95 4 LERNOUT 8 HAUSPIE SPEECH PRODS PUT D1497A 10 1 CELANESE AG ORD D1668R 12 3 * DAIMLERCHRYSLER AG ORD D1668R 90 3 DAIMLERCHRYSLER AG CALL D1668R 95 3 DAIMLERCHRYSLER AG PUT F9212D 14 2 TOTAL FINA ELF S A WT EXP 080503 G0070K 10 3 * ACE LTD ORD G0070K 90 3 ACE LTD CALL G0070K 95 3 ACE LTD PUT GO2602 10 3 * AMDOCS LTD ORD GO2602 90 3 AMDOCS LTD CALL GO2602 95 3 AMDOCS LTD PUT GO2995 10 1 AMERICAN SAFETY INS GROUP LTD ORD G0352M 10 8 * AMWAY ASIA PACIFIC LTD COM DELETED G0352M 90 8 AMWAY ASIA PACIFIC LTD CALL DELETED G0352M 95 8 AMWAY ASIA PACIFIC LTD PUT DELETED GO3910 10 9 * ANNUITY AND LIFE RE HLDGS ORD GO3910 90 9 ANNUITY AND LIFE RE HLDGS CALL GO3910 95 9 ANNUITY AND LIFE RE HLDGS PUT GO4074 10 3 APEX SILVER MINES LTD ORD GO4074 11 1 APEX SILVER MINES LTD WT EXP 110402 GO4450 10 5 ARAMEX INTL LTD ORD GO5345 10 6 ASIA PACIFIC RES INTL HLDG LTD CL A G0535E 10 6 ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORP ORD GO5354 10 8 ASIACONTENT COM LTD CL A ADDED G1368B 10 2 BRILLIANCE CHINA AUTO HLDG LTD COM DELETED 620045 20 2 CENTRAL EUROPEAN MEDIA ENTRPRS CL A NEW G2107X 10 8 CHINA TIRE HLDGS LTD COM G2108N 10 9 * CHINADOTCOM CORP CL A G2108N 90 9 CHINADOTCOM CORP CALL G2lO8N 95 9 CHINADOTCOM CORP PUT 621082 10 5 CHINA YUCHAI INTL LTD COM 623257 10 1 COMMODORE HLDGS LTD ORD 623257 11
    [Show full text]
  • ZILLOW GROUP, INC. (Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE 14A (Rule 14a-101) INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. ) Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐ Check the appropriate box: ☐ Preliminary Proxy Statement ☐ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) ☒ Definitive Proxy Statement ☐ Definitive Additional Materials ☐ Soliciting Material under § 240.14a-12 ZILLOW GROUP, INC. (Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) N/A (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): ☒ No fee required. ☐ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: (5) Total fee paid: ☐ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. ☐ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
    [Show full text]
  • PRIMUS TELECOMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INCORPORATED (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    Table of Contents SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission File No. 0-29092 PRIMUS TELECOMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INCORPORATED (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 54-1708481 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 7901 Jones Branch Drive, Suite 900, McLean, VA 22102 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (703) 902-2800 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered None N/A Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $.01 per share Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]