DOCSLIB.ORG

Reserse Insecticid Patent.Xlsx

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reserse Insecticid Patent.Xlsx Group Answer Title Title Terms Abstract group 1 L14 1 OF 27 Plant fiber sterilization mosquito‐repellent incense. The invention is a plant fiber sterilization mosquito‐repellent incense. The plant fiber wormwood mosquito‐repellent incense belongs to the technical field of mosquito repellent products. The mosquito INPADOCDB 遘肴､咲黄郤､扈ｴ譚 闖瑚嚏鬥・ repellent incense consists of the following substances: 5 to 15 parts of wormwood, 1 to 5 parts of daphnarcphne genkwa, 15 to 25 parts of elm bark, 1 to 3 parts of lignum santali album, 1 to 3 partsof mint, 4 to 6 parts of agallochum, 0.5 to 1.5 parts of musk, 40 to 50 parts of waste plantfibers , 40 to 55 parts of bamboo charcoal powder, 2 to 8 parts of kaolin, 1 to 4 parts of Edgeworthia chrysantha Lindl., 2 to 6 parts of gingko, 3 to 5 parts of eranthis hyemalis, and 1 to 2 parts of codonopsis pilosula. The mosquito‐repellent incense of the invention can effectively repel and kill mosquitoes for a long time, and the raw material cost is low. The mosquito‐repellent incense adopts a large amount of waste plantfibers instead of wood powder, thereby not only saving forest resources, butalso achieving the purpose of waste utilization; the mosquito‐repellent incense has few harmful substances when burned, and avoids use ofpyrethroid compounds and has no toxic or harmful effects on human bodies; and the mosquito‐repellent incense has a certain degree of inhibition and killing effect on staphylococcus aureus, shigella flexneri and other pathogens. group 1 L14 2 OF 27 Plant fiber long‐acting mosquito‐repellent incense. The invention relates to plant fiber long‐acting mosquito‐repellent incense, and belongs to the technical field of mosquito repellent products. The mosquito‐repellent incense consists of the INPADOCDB 遘肴､咲黄郤､扈ｴ髟ｿ謨郁嚏鬥・ followingsubstances: 40 to 50 parts of waste plant fibers, 40 to 55 parts of bamboo charcoal powder, 2 to 5 parts of wormwood, 1 to 5 parts of honeysuckle flower, 1 to 5 parts of mint, 1 to 7 parts of light calcium carbonate, 3 to 10 parts of potassium nitrate, 2 to 8 parts of kaolin, 1 to 4 parts of Edgeworthia chrysantha Lindl., 2 to 6 parts of ginkgo, 3 to 5 parts of eranthis hyemalis, and 1 to 2 partsof codonopsis pilosula. The mosquito‐repellent incense of the invention can effectively repel and kill mosquitoes for a long time, and the raw material cost is low. The mosquito‐repellent incense adopts waste plant fibers instead of wood powder, thereby not only saving forest resources, but also achieving the purpose of waste utilization; the mosquito‐repellent incense has few harmful substanceswhen burned, and avoids use of pyrethroid compounds and has no toxic or harmful effects on human bodies; and the combustion‐supporting effect of the added potassium nitrate makes the mosquito‐repellent incense fully burned. The light calcium carbonate plays a certain role in flame retarding and prevents the mosquito‐repellent incense from burning too quickly. group 1 L14 3 OF 27 Plant fiber powerful mosquito‐repellent incense. Plant fiber powerful mosquito‐repellent incense belongs to the technical field of mosquito repellent products. The incense consists of the following substances: 40 to 50 parts of waste plantfibers , 40 INPADOCDB 遘肴､咲黄郤､扈ｴ蠑ｺ謨郁嚏鬥・ to 55 parts of bamboo charcoal powder, 2 to 8 parts of kaolin, 1 to 4 parts of Edgeworthia chrysantha Lindl., 2 to 6 parts of ginkgo, 3 to 5 parts of eranthis hyemalis, 1 to 2 parts of codonopsis pilosula, 15 to 40 parts of vegetable powder, 0.1 to 0.7 part of starch, 0.02 to 0.5 part ofpyrethroid , and 5 to 10 parts of natural wild chrysanthemum. The mosquito‐repellent incense of the inventioncan effectively repel and kill mosquitoes for a long time, and the raw material cost is low. The mosquito‐repellent incense adopts a large amount of waste plantfibers instead of wood powder, therebynot only saving forest resources, but also achieving the purpose of waste utilization. When the mosquito‐repellent incense burns, the harmful substances are few, the combustion is stable, the amount of smoke is small and the smell is fresh group 1 L14 4 OF 27 Plant fiber Chinese medicine mosquito coil. The invention discloses a plant fiber Chinese medicine mosquito coil, and belongs to the technical field of insect repellent products. The plantfiber Chinese medicine mosquito coil consists of the INPADOCDB 遘肴､咲黄郤､扈ｴ荳ｭ闕ｯ陏企ｦ・ following substances: 25‐40 parts of mosquito repellent herb, 5‐12 parts of melia azedarach, 3‐8 parts of marigold, 4‐8 parts of orange peel, 2‐9 parts of murraya paniculata, 1‐9 parts of mentha haplocalyx, and 5‐20 parts of muntiacus reevesi micrurus, 1‐5 parts of tobacco leaf, 8‐15 parts of syzygium aromaticum, 40‐50 parts of waste plantfiber , 40‐55 of bamboo charcoal powder, 2‐8 parts of kaolin,1‐4 parts of edgeworthia chrysantha, 2‐6 parts of ginkgo biloba, 3‐5 parts of veratrum nigrum and 1‐2 parts of codonopsis pilosula. According to the plantfiber Chinese medicine mosquito coil, mosquitoes can be effectively repelled and killed for a long time, cost of the raw materials is low, and a large amount of waste plantfiber is used to instead wood flour, so that not only are forest resources saved, but also a purpose of waste utilization is achieved; and harmful substances are extremely few when the mosquito coil burns, and using ofpyrethroid compounds is avoided, thereby having no toxic effects on human bodies. group 1 L14 5 OF 27 Special water‐soluble colloid agent for dripping The invention discloses a special water‐soluble colloid agent for dripping persimmontree trunk, and a preparation method thereof, and relates to the technical field of persimmontree insect pest INPADOCDB persimmon tree trunk, and preparation method prevention, wherein the raw materials comprise, by weight, 5‐30% of a natural polymer material, 1‐15% of a synergist, 3‐24% of a solvent, 0.3‐10% of a surfactant, 1‐10% of a non‐polluting insecticide, thereof. 0.3‐5% of an anti‐freezing agent, and the balance of water, wherein the natural polymer material is potassium alginate, the surfactant is one or a plurality of materials selected from a series of Tween 遘堺ｸ鍋畑莠取涸譬第大ｹｲ貊ｴ豕ｨ逧・ｰｴ貅ｶ諤ｧ emulsifiers, the synergist is the composite extraction liquid of ailanthus altissima leaf, hot pepper and artemisia argyi, and the non‐polluting insecticide is one or a plurality of materials selected from an 閭ｶ菴灘奄蜿雁・蛻ｶ螟・婿豕・ efficient cypermethrin raw drug, an acetamiprid raw drug, and a phoxim raw drug. According to the present invention, the effect can be lasted for a year after the special water‐soluble colloid agent is 遘堺ｸ鍋畑莠取涸譬第大ｹｲ貊ｴ豕ｨ逧・ｰｴ貅ｶ諤ｧ used, such that the insecticide consumption can be reduced, the prevention and control effect is good, the labor and the time can be saved, and the yield and the quality of the persimmontree fruit are 閭ｶ菴灘奄蜿雁・蛻ｶ螟・婿豕・ improved; the wood part is not damaged after the dripping; the special water‐soluble colloid agent has good environmental compatibility and is safe to human and animals; and the preparation method has characteristics of simple preparation steps and mild preparation condition. group 1 L14 6 OF 27 Encapsulated wood preservatives. Disclosed is the use an organic biocidal composition to treat wood or timber products, such that the composition comprises capsules of a mean particle size of between 1 and 20 microns, with a INPADOCDB polymeric outer shell, encapsulating a biocide such as an isothiazolone, a benzthiazole, apyrethroid , a neonicotenoid, a halogenated carbamate, an azole, a chloronitrile or a combination thereof. group 1 L14 7 OF 27 ﾐ｣ﾐ｡ﾐ｢ﾐﾐ榧厰｡ﾐ｢ﾐ漬・ﾐ頒嶢ｯ 1. A bound friable mixture, including: (a) at least one bioactive chemical; bound by sorption with (b) a binding carrier. 2. The bound friable mixture as recited in claim 1, wherein the binding carrier is INPADOCDB ﾐﾐ片寅｣ﾐ嶢侑ﾐ｣ﾐ片慴榧寅・ﾐ漬ｫﾐ｡ﾐ漬榧岱榧 selected from the group consisting of carbon black, activated carbon, alumina, hydroxyapatite, silicoalumina and combinations thereof. 3. The bound friable mixture as recited in claim 1, further ・ﾐ頒片斷侑ｯ ﾐ頒嶢ｯ ﾐ｡ﾐ榧･ﾐﾐ籍斷片斷侑ｯ including a pre‐polymer. 4. The bound friable mixture as recited in claim 3, wherein the pre‐polymer is polyethylene. 5. The bound friable mixture as recited in claim 1, wherein the bioactive chemical is ﾐ頒片ﾐ片漬ｯﾐ斷斷榧・ﾐ墟榧斷｡ﾐ｢ﾐ in a liquid form during forming said friable mixture. 6. A controlled release device for deterring, repelling or killing pests including the bound friable mixture of claim 1 dispersed within a continuous ﾐ｣ﾐ墟ｦﾐ侑・ ﾐ墟榧斷｢ﾐ籍墟｢ﾐ侑ﾐ｣ﾐｮﾐｩﾐ片・ﾐ｡ polymeric matrix. 7. The controlled release device as recited in claim 6, wherein said bioactive chemical comprises a pesticide selected from the group consisting ofpyrethroid , isofenphos, fenvalerate, ﾐ寅ﾐ｣ﾐ斷｢ﾐ榧・ water soluble bioactive chemicals, tefluthrin, permethrin, fenoxycarb, chlorpyrifos, lambdacyhalothrin, resmethrin, deltamethrin,cypermethrin , cyphenothrin, cyfluthrin, and combinations thereof. 8. CONTROLLED RELEASE DEVICE FOR THE The controlled release device as recited in claim 6, wherein said bioactive chemical includes at least one fungicide. 9. The controlled release device as recited in claim 8, wherein said fungicide is PRESERVATION OF WOODEN STRUCTURE selected from the group consisting of tri‐chloronitromethane, a mixture of methylisothiocyanate and 1,3 dichloropropane, sodium N‐methyl dithiocarbomate, 2,3,5,6‐tetracholoro‐1,9‐benzoquinone, PROXIMATE SOIL. ﾐ｣ﾐ｡ﾐ｢ﾐﾐ榧厰｡ﾐ｢ﾐ漬・ﾐ頒嶢ｯ calcium cyanamide, biphenyl, copper naphthenate, dichlorphen, fentin hydroxide and combinations thereof. 10. The controlled release device as recited in claim 6, wherein said binding carrier is carbon ﾐﾐ片寅｣ﾐ嶢侑ﾐ｣ﾐ片慴榧寅・ﾐ漬ｫﾐ｡ﾐ漬榧岱榧 black. 11. The controlled release device as recited in claim 6, wherein saidpolymer of said polymeric matrix is hydrophobia.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historical Perspectives on Apple Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Insecticidal Chemistries
    Historical Perspectives on Apple Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Insecticidal Chemistries. Peter Jentsch Extension Associate Department of Entomology Cornell University's Hudson Valley Lab 3357 Rt. 9W; PO box 727 Highland, NY 12528 email: [email protected] Phone 845-691-7151 Mobile: 845-417-7465 http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/ent/faculty/jentsch/ 2 Historical Perspectives on Fruit Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Chemistries. by Peter Jentsch I. Historical Use of Pesticides in Apple Production Overview of Apple Production and Pest Management Prior to 1940 Synthetic Pesticide Development and Use II. Influences Changing the Pest Management Profile in Apple Production Chemical Residues in Early Insect Management Historical Chemical Regulation Recent Regulation Developments Changing Pest Management Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 The Science Behind The Methodology Pesticide Revisions – Requirements For New Registrations III. Resistance of Insect Pests to Insecticides Resistance Pest Management Strategies IV. Reduced Risk Chemistries: New Modes of Action and the Insecticide Treadmill Fermentation Microbial Products Bt’s, Abamectins, Spinosads Juvenile Hormone Analogs Formamidines, Juvenile Hormone Analogs And Mimics Insect Growth Regulators Azadirachtin, Thiadiazine Neonicotinyls Major Reduced Risk Materials: Carboxamides, Carboxylic Acid Esters, Granulosis Viruses, Diphenyloxazolines, Insecticidal Soaps, Benzoyl Urea Growth Regulators, Tetronic Acids, Oxadiazenes , Particle Films, Phenoxypyrazoles, Pyridazinones, Spinosads, Tetrazines , Organotins, Quinolines. 3 I Historical Use of Pesticides in Apple Production Overview of Apple Production and Pest Management Prior to 1940 The apple has a rather ominous origin. Its inception is framed in the biblical text regarding the genesis of mankind. The backdrop appears to be the turbulent setting of what many scholars believe to be present day Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES
    US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES Note: Pesticide tolerance information is updated in the Code of Federal Regulations on a weekly basis. EPA plans to update these indexes biannually. These indexes are current as of the date indicated in the pdf file. For the latest information on pesticide tolerances, please check the electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) at http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_07/40cfrv23_07.html 1 40 CFR Type Family Common name CAS Number PC code 180.163 Acaricide bridged diphenyl Dicofol (1,1-Bis(chlorophenyl)-2,2,2-trichloroethanol) 115-32-2 10501 180.198 Acaricide phosphonate Trichlorfon 52-68-6 57901 180.259 Acaricide sulfite ester Propargite 2312-35-8 97601 180.446 Acaricide tetrazine Clofentezine 74115-24-5 125501 180.448 Acaricide thiazolidine Hexythiazox 78587-05-0 128849 180.517 Acaricide phenylpyrazole Fipronil 120068-37-3 129121 180.566 Acaricide pyrazole Fenpyroximate 134098-61-6 129131 180.572 Acaricide carbazate Bifenazate 149877-41-8 586 180.593 Acaricide unclassified Etoxazole 153233-91-1 107091 180.599 Acaricide unclassified Acequinocyl 57960-19-7 6329 180.341 Acaricide, fungicide dinitrophenol Dinocap (2, 4-Dinitro-6-octylphenyl crotonate and 2,6-dinitro-4- 39300-45-3 36001 octylphenyl crotonate} 180.111 Acaricide, insecticide organophosphorus Malathion 121-75-5 57701 180.182 Acaricide, insecticide cyclodiene Endosulfan 115-29-7 79401
    [Show full text]
  • Index to the NLM Classification 2011
    National Library of Medicine Classification 2011 Index Disease see Tyrosinemias 1-8 5,12-diHETE see Leukotriene B4 1,2-Benzopyrones see Coumarins 5,12-HETE see Leukotriene B4 1,2-Dibromoethane see Ethylene Dibromide 5-HT see Serotonin 1,8-Dihydroxy-9-anthrone see Anthralin 5-HT Antagonists see Serotonin Antagonists 1-Oxacephalosporin see Moxalactam 5-Hydroxytryptamine see Serotonin 1-Propanol 5-Hydroxytryptamine Antagonists see Serotonin Organic chemistry QD 305.A4 Antagonists Pharmacology QV 82 6-Mercaptopurine QV 269 1-Sar-8-Ala Angiotensin II see Saralasin 7S RNA see RNA, Small Nuclear 1-Sarcosine-8-Alanine Angiotensin II see Saralasin 8-Hydroxyquinoline see Oxyquinoline 13-cis-Retinoic Acid see Isotretinoin 8-Methoxypsoralen see Methoxsalen 15th Century History see History, 15th Century 8-Quinolinol see Oxyquinoline 16th Century History see History, 16th Century 17 beta-Estradiol see Estradiol 17-Ketosteroids WK 755 A 17-Oxosteroids see 17-Ketosteroids A Fibers see Nerve Fibers, Myelinated 17th Century History see History, 17th Century Aardvarks see Xenarthra 18th Century History see History, 18th Century Abate see Temefos 19th Century History see History, 19th Century Abattoirs WA 707 2',3'-Cyclic-Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases QU 136 Abbreviations 2,4-D see 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid Chemistry QD 7 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid General P 365-365.5 Organic chemistry QD 341.A2 Library symbols (U.S.) Z 881 2',5'-Oligoadenylate Polymerase see Medical W 13 2',5'-Oligoadenylate Synthetase By specialties (Form number 13 in any NLM
    [Show full text]
  • Lifetime Organophosphorous Insecticide Use Among Private Pesticide Applicators in the Agricultural Health Study
    Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (2012) 22, 584 -- 592 & 2012 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved 1559-0631/12 www.nature.com/jes ORIGINAL ARTICLE Lifetime organophosphorous insecticide use among private pesticide applicators in the Agricultural Health Study Jane A. Hoppin1, Stuart Long2, David M. Umbach3, Jay H. Lubin4, Sarah E. Starks5, Fred Gerr5, Kent Thomas6, Cynthia J. Hines7, Scott Weichenthal8, Freya Kamel1, Stella Koutros9, Michael Alavanja9, Laura E. Beane Freeman9 and Dale P. Sandler1 Organophosphorous insecticides (OPs) are the most commonly used insecticides in US agriculture, but little information is available regarding specific OP use by individual farmers. We describe OP use for licensed private pesticide applicators from Iowa and North Carolina in the Agricultural Health Study (AHS) using lifetime pesticide use data from 701 randomly selected male participants collected at three time periods. Of 27 OPs studied, 20 were used by 41%. Overall, 95% had ever applied at least one OP. The median number of different OPs used was 4 (maximum ¼ 13). Malathion was the most commonly used OP (74%) followed by chlorpyrifos (54%). OP use declined over time. At the first interview (1993--1997), 68% of participants had applied OPs in the past year; by the last interview (2005--2007), only 42% had. Similarly, median annual application days of OPs declined from 13.5 to 6 days. Although OP use was common, the specific OPs used varied by state, time period, and individual. Much of the variability in OP use was associated with the choice of OP, rather than the frequency or duration of application.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED NATIONS Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic
    UNITED NATIONS SC UNEP/POPS/POPRC.8/INF/12 Distr.: General 14 August 2012 English only Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Persistent Organic Pollutants Review Committee Eighth meeting Geneva, 15–19 October 2012 Item 5 (e) and (f) of the provisional agenda* Technical work: assessment of alternatives to endosulfan; assessment of alternatives to DDT Report on the assessment of chemical alternatives to endosulfan and DDT Note by the Secretariat As referred to in documents UNEP/POPS/POPRC.8/8 and UNEP/POPS/POPRC.8/9, the report on the assessment of chemical alternatives to endosulfan and DDT is set out in the annex to the present note; it has not been formally edited. * UNEP/POPS/POPRC.8/1. K1282318 040912 UNEP/POPS/POPRC.8/INF/12 Annex Report on the assessment of chemical alternatives to endosulfan and DDT Draft prepared by the ad hoc working group on assessment of alternatives to endosulfan and DDT under the POPs Review Committee of the Stockholm Convention July 2012 2 UNEP/POPS/POPRC.8/INF/12 Table of Content 1. Disclaimer 2. Background and proposed results 3. Prioritization of Chemical Alternatives for Endosulfan with respect to the Persistent Organic Pollutant (POP) Characteristics (Annex D) 3.1. Introduction 3.2. Endpoint and data selection for prioritisation 3.3. Experimental information 3.4. QSAR information 3.5. Description of the data sources 3.6. Uncertainties 3.7. Data analysis 3.8. Results 3.9. Comments on selected alternative substances 4. Methodology for the assessment of persistent organic pollutant characteristics and identification of other hazard indicators for the assessment of chemical alternatives to Endosulfan and DDT 4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecularly Imprinted Polymers Combined with Electrochemical Sensors for Food Contaminants Analysis
    molecules Review Molecularly Imprinted Polymers Combined with Electrochemical Sensors for Food Contaminants Analysis Dounia Elfadil 1,2, Abderrahman Lamaoui 2 , Flavio Della Pelle 1 , Aziz Amine 2,* and Dario Compagnone 1,* 1 Faculty of Bioscience and Technology for Food, Agriculture and Environment, University of Teramo, Via Renato Balzarini 1, 64100 Teramo, Italy; [email protected] (D.E.); [email protected] (F.D.P.) 2 Laboratory of Process Engineering and Environment, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques, Hassan II University of Casablanca, Mohammedia 28810, Morocco; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (A.A.); [email protected] (D.C.) Abstract: Detection of relevant contaminants using screening approaches is a key issue to ensure food safety and respect for the regulatory limits established. Electrochemical sensors present several advantages such as rapidity; ease of use; possibility of on-site analysis and low cost. The lack of selectivity for electrochemical sensors working in complex samples as food may be overcome by coupling them with molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs). MIPs are synthetic materials that mimic biological receptors and are produced by the polymerization of functional monomers in presence of a target analyte. This paper critically reviews and discusses the recent progress in MIP-based electrochemical sensors for food safety. A brief introduction on MIPs and electrochemical sensors is given; followed by a discussion of the recent achievements for various MIPs-based electrochemical sensors for food contaminants analysis. Both electropolymerization and chemical synthesis of MIP- Citation: Elfadil, D.; Lamaoui, A.; based electrochemical sensing are discussed as well as the relevant applications of MIPs used in Della Pelle, F.; Amine, A.; sample preparation and then coupled to electrochemical analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Health Criteria 145 Methyl Parathion
    Environmental Health Criteria 145 Methyl parathion Please note that the layout and pagination of this web version are not identical with the printed version. Methyl parathion (EHC 145, 1992) INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMME ON CHEMICAL SAFETY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CRITERIA 145 METHYL PARATHION This report contains the collective views of an international group of experts and does not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organisation, or the World Health Organization. Published under the joint sponsorship of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organisation, and the World Health Organization First draft prepared by Dr R.F. Hertel and co-workers, Fraunhofer Institute of Toxicology and Aerosol Research, Hanover, Germany World Health Orgnization Geneva, 1993 The International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) is a joint venture of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organisation, and the World Health Organization. The main objective of the IPCS is to carry out and disseminate evaluations of the effects of chemicals on human health and the quality of the environment. Supporting activities include the development of epidemiological, experimental laboratory, and risk-assessment methods that could produce internationally comparable results, and the development of manpower in the field of toxicology. Other activities carried out by the IPCS include the development of know-how for coping with chemical accidents,
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2017/205751 Al 30 November 2017 (30.11.2017) W !P O PCT
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2017/205751 Al 30 November 2017 (30.11.2017) W !P O PCT (51) International Patent Classification: WHEELER, Christopher; c/o Provivi, Inc., 1701 Col A01M 29/12 (201 1.01) C12N 15/82 (2006.01) orado Avenue, Santa Monica, California 90404 (US). A I 27/00 (2006.01) C12P 19/34 (2006.01) (74) Agent: VEITENHEIMER, Erich et al. ; Cooley LLP, 1299 (21) International Application Number: Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 700, Washington, Dis PCT/US20 17/034697 trict of Columbia 20004-2400 (US). (22) International Filing Date: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every 26 May 2017 (26.05.2017) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, (25) Filing Language: English CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DJ, DK, DM, DO, (26) Publication Language: English DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KH, KN, KP, KR, (30) Priority Data: KW, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, 62/342,807 27 May 2016 (27.05.2016) US MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, (71) Applicant: PROVIVI, INC. [US/US]; 1701 Colorado Av PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, enue, Santa Monica, California 90404 (US).
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7.655,597 B1 Sanders (45) Date of Patent: Feb
    USOO7655597 B1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7.655,597 B1 Sanders (45) Date of Patent: Feb. 2, 2010 (54) PESTICIDE COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING 4,867,972 A 9, 1989 Girardeau et al. POLYMERC AIDUVANTS 6,093,679 A 7/2000 AZuma et al. 6,146,652 A 11/2000 Gore et al. 6,515,091 B2 2/2003 Sanders et al. (75) Inventor: John Larry Sanders, Leawood, KS 6,610,282 B1 8, 2003 Ghosh (US) 6,677,399 B2 1/2004 Herbert et al. 6,703,469 B2 3/2004 Sanders et al. (73) Assignee: Specialty Fertilizer Products, LLC, 6,706,666 B2 3/2004 HaSebe et al. Leawood, KS (US) 6,897,184 B2 5/2005 Kurita et al. 7,407,667 B2 8, 2008 Zerrer et al. (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 2004/0226331 A1 11/2004 Sanders et al. patent is extended or adjusted under 35 2004/0248741 A1 12/2004 Gotsche et al. U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. 2005/00904O2 A1* 4/2005 Dieing et al. ............... 504,361 2008.0167189 A1 7/2008 Oetter et al. (21) Appl. No.: 12/534,481 2008.0171658 A1 7/2008 Dyllick-Brenzinger et al. (22) Filed: Aug. 3, 2009 * cited by examiner Primary Examiner Johann R Richter (51) Int. Cl. Assistant Examiner—Andriae M Holt AOIN 25/00 (2006.01) (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm Hovey Williams LLP AOIN 57/26 (2006.01) AOIN 25/28 (2006.01) (57) ABSTRACT (52) U.S. Cl. .................... 504/116.1; 504/206; 504/360; 504/361 Pesticidal compositions of improved effectiveness are pro (58) Field of Classification Search ................
    [Show full text]
  • Shakoori a Et Al
    Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research (2018), 17(2): 571-584 Received: May 2017 Accepted: December 2017 Original Article The Effects of House Cooking Process on Residue Concentrations of 41 Multi-Class Pesticides in Rice Attaollah Shakooria, b, Hassan Yazdanpanaha, c*, Farzad Kobarfarda, d, e , Mohammad Hossein Shojaee f and Jamshid Salamzadeha, g aFood Safety Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. bDeputy for Food and Drug Affairs, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. cToxicology and Pharmacology Deptartment, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. dPhytochemistry Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. eMedicinal Chemistry Deptartment, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. fFaroogh Life Sciences Research Laboratory, Tehran, Iran. gClinical Pharmacy Deptartment, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Abstract In current study, the effects of Iranian rice cooking method (Kateh) on residue levels of 41 pesticides were investigated. The pesticides were selected according to Iranian National Standards Organization (INSO) regulations and covered 18 permitted and 23 banned pesticides belonging to different chemical classes such as organophosphate, triazole, and carbamate. A 250 g portion of rice sample was soaked in 2.5 L spiked tap water containing studied pesticides at final concentration 2 μg/mL and then, the effects of washing and cooking were investigated. The pesticides were analyzed simultaneously in a single run using positive electrospray ionisation with multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) after extraction with QuEChERS method. The results showed that washing removed different portions of pesticide residues in the range between 12.0-88.1%.
    [Show full text]
  • Cannabis Science Task Force Recommendations: Laboratory Quality Standards for Pesticides in Cannabis Plants and Products
    Cannabis Science Task Force Recommendations: Laboratory Quality Standards for Pesticides in Cannabis Plants and Products June 2020 Publication 20-03-005 Publication and Contact Information This document is available on the Department of Ecology’s website at: https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/summarypages/2003005.html. For more information contact: Environmental Assessment Program Washington State Department of Ecology P.O. Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504-7600 Phone: 360-407-6764 Washington State Department of Ecology — www.ecology.wa.gov • Headquarters, Olympia 360-407-6000 • Northwest Regional Office, Bellevue 425-649-7000 • Southwest Regional Office, Olympia 360-407-6300 • Central Regional Office, Union Gap 509-575-2490 • Eastern Regional Office, Spokane 509-329-3400 Any use of product or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the author or the Department of Ecology. To request ADA accommodation, including materials in a format for the visually impaired, call Ecology at 360-407-6764 or visit https://ecology.wa.gov/accessibility. People with impaired hearing may call Washington Relay Service at 711. People with speech disability may call 877-833- 6341. Cannabis Science Task Force Recommendations: Laboratory Quality Standards for Pesticides in Cannabis Plants and Products by Sara Sekerak Environmental Assessment Program Washington State Department of Ecology Olympia, Washington Publication 20-03-005 Page 1 Acknowledgements Members of the Cannabis Science Task Force steering committee and working groups have contributed countless hours of expertise to develop science-based laboratory quality standards. The collective efforts and recommendations of the Cannabis Science Task Force are detailed in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Table A4. Reporting Limits, Sampling Frequency, Use, and Class for The
    Table A4. Reporting limits, sampling frequency, use, and class for the pesticides and degradation products analyzed in filtered water, Columbia River Estuary, 2004–05 [Analytes shown in bold type and shaded were detected in this study; NWQL schedule, schedule number used at USGS National Water-Quality Laboratory; CAS, Chemical Abstract Service; reporting limits listed in micrograms per liter; CAAT, chlordiamino-s-triazine; CEAT, 2-chloro-6-ethylamino-4-amino- s -triazine; CIAT, 2- chloro-4-isopropylamino-6-amino-s -triazine; EPTC, S-ethyl dipropyl thiocarbamate; DDE, dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene; DDT, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethylene; HCH, hexachlorocyclohexane; MCPA, (4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetic acid; MCPB, 4-(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)butanoic acid;OIET, 2-hydroxy-4-isopropylamino-6-ethylamino- s -triazine; NA, not available; D, degradation product; Def, defoilant; F, fungicide; Fum, fumigant; H, herbicide; I, insecticide; N, nematocide; PGR, plant growth regulator; S, stimulant; --, no data] Parameter NWQL Sampling Analyte code schedule CAS number Use Class Parent compound Reporting limits frequency Acetochlor 49260 2001 34256-82-1 H Chloroacetamide -- 0.006 Monthly Acifluorfen 49315 2060 50594-66-6 H Diphenyl ether -- 0.007, 0.028 Quarterly Alachlor 46342 2001 15972-60-8 H Chloroacetamide -- 0.005 Monthly Aldicarb 49312 2060 116-06-3 I Carbamate -- 0.040 Quarterly Aldicarb sulfone 49313 2060 1646-88-4 D Carbamate Aldicarb 0.020, 0.018 Quarterly Aldicarb sulfoxide 49314 2060 1646-87-3 D Carbamate Aldicarb 0.008, 0.022 Quarterly
    [Show full text]