DOCSLIB.ORG

Agricultural Practices and Technologies DRAFT REPORT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Agricultural Practices and Technologies DRAFT REPORT OF CALIFO TE RN TA IA S # # R D E CENTRAL G R VALLEY A I O REGION O N B A L L O W R A T TE N R CO QUALITY CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD CENTRAL VALLEY REGION Agricultural Practices and Technologies DRAFT REPORT May 2002 DRAFT State of California California Environmental Protection Agency REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD CENTRAL VALLEY REGION Robert Schneider, Chair Karl. Longley, Vice Chair Beverly Alves, Member Alson Brizard, Member Christopher Cabaldon, Member Mark Salvaggio, Member Cher Kablanow, Member Robert Fong, Member Thomas R. Pinkos, Acting Executive Officer 3443 Routier Road, Suite A Sacramento, California 95827-3003 Phone: (916) 255-3000 CalNet: 8-494-3000 DISCLAIMER This publication is a technical report by staff of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region. No policy or regulation is either expressed or intended. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD CENTRAL VALLEY REGION Agricultural Practices and Technologies DRAFT REPORT May 2002 DRAFT REPORT COMPILED BY: EMILIE REYES MARY MENCONI ADDITIONAL STAFF INVOLVED IN REPORT PREPARATION:: DANIEL CARLTON MATTHEW MCCARTHY FOREWORD The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Environmental Protection Agency or the State Water Resources Control Board, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Daniel Carlton compiled tables presented in Appendix B of this report and wrote portions of the integrated pest management section. Matthew McCarthy provided input and wrote portions of the soil section. This document also greatly benefited from an existing practices report compiled by the Sacramento River Watershed Program. Sections in this document relating to dormant season practices for orchards, vegetation and soil management practices, and pesticide application methods have borrowed heavily from the aforementioned document. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 7 2.0 PESTICIDE APPLICATION PRACTICES AND TECHNOLOGIES .......... 9 2.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 9 2.2 PESTICIDE APPLICATION TECHNOLOGIES AND PRACTICES................................. 10 2.2.1 Spill Prevention/Emergency Response ..................................................... 10 2.2.2 Mixing and Loading.................................................................................. 11 2.2.3 Disposal Practices .................................................................................... 12 2.2.4 Sprayer Calibration and Nozzle Selection................................................ 12 2.2.5 New Equipment Technology ..................................................................... 13 2.2.6 Equipment Maintenance ........................................................................... 14 2.2.7 Selection of Ground or Aerial Application ............................................... 14 2.2.8 Reduction of Aerial Drift .......................................................................... 14 2.2.9 Setback/Buffer/No Spray Zones ................................................................ 16 2.2.10 Application Rates and Spray Volumes...................................................... 16 2.2.11 Spray Adjuvants ........................................................................................ 17 3.0 PEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ............................................................. 18 3.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 18 3.2 MAJOR ECONOMIC INSECT PESTS ...................................................................... 19 3.2.1 Peach Twig Borer (PTB) .......................................................................... 19 3.2.2 Oriental Fruit Moth (OFM)...................................................................... 20 3.2.3 Codling Moth ............................................................................................ 20 3.2.4 San Jose Scale (SJS) ................................................................................. 20 3.2.5 Webspinning Spider Mites ........................................................................ 21 3.2.6 Egyptian Alfalfa Weevil ............................................................................ 21 3.3 PEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR ORCHARDS .............................................. 21 3.3.1 Introduction............................................................................................... 21 3.3.2 Pest Management Options for Orchard Crops......................................... 22 Conventional Dormant Oil and OP Pesticide ....................................................... 22 No Dormant Application or Dormant Oil Only and In-season Applications as Needed .................................................................................................................. 23 Alternate Year Dormant OP with Yearly Oil Only Application........................... 25 Dormant Oil and Pyrethroids or Carbamates........................................................ 25 Dormant Oil and Spinosad.................................................................................... 26 Bt at Bloomtime for PTB...................................................................................... 26 Pheromone Mating Disruption for PTB................................................................ 27 3.4 PEST MANAGEMENT OPTIONS FOR ROW CROPS ................................................ 28 3.4.1 Introduction............................................................................................... 28 2 3.4.2 Pest Management Options for Row and Field Crops ............................... 28 Organophosphorus ................................................................................................ 28 Carbamates and Pyrethroids ................................................................................. 29 Bt use on row crops during growing season ......................................................... 29 Reduced Risk Alternative Pesticides For Row Crops........................................... 29 Other Row Crop Considerations: Cultural Practices ............................................ 30 3.5 ALFALFA-SPECIFIC FIELD CROP PRACTICES....................................................... 31 3.5.1 Introduction............................................................................................... 31 3.5.2 Pest Management Options for Alfalfa....................................................... 32 Conventional Pesticide Treatment ........................................................................ 32 Bt........................................................................................................................... 32 Cutting practices ................................................................................................... 32 Overseeding in weak stands.................................................................................. 33 4.0 VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ......................................................................... 33 4.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 33 4.2 TYPES OF VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ................................................ 34 4.2.1 Cover Crops.............................................................................................. 34 Description............................................................................................................ 34 Resident Vegetation.............................................................................................. 35 Seeded Cover Crops.............................................................................................. 35 Annuals ............................................................................................................. 35 Perennials.......................................................................................................... 36 Green Manure Crops......................................................................................... 36 Crop-Specific Considerations ............................................................................... 36 Pending Research.................................................................................................. 36 Data Gaps.............................................................................................................. 38 4.2.2 Buffers....................................................................................................... 38 Description............................................................................................................ 38 Filter Strips............................................................................................................ 39 Hedgerows ............................................................................................................ 39 Riparian Buffers.................................................................................................... 40 Vegetated Waterways ........................................................................................... 40 Constructed Wetlands ..........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Saissetia Oleae (Bernard) 65-70% R.H
    ENTOMOLOGIA HELLENICA Vol. 3, 1985 Duration of life-cycle of three parasitic hymenoptera on Saissetia oleαe (Bernard) growing on two different host plants. Macropodi M.V. The Olive Institute, Corfu https://doi.org/10.12681/eh.13923 Copyright © 2017 M.V. Macropodi To cite this article: Macropodi, M.V. (1985). Duration of life-cycle of three parasitic hymenoptera on Saissetia oleαe (Bernard) growing on two different host plants.. ENTOMOLOGIA HELLENICA, 3, 63-64. doi:https://doi.org/10.12681/eh.13923 http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 30/09/2021 15:36:41 | SHORT COMMUNICATION ENTOMOLOGIA HELLENICA 3 (1985): 63 - 64 the parasite was finally established. The above parasites can be successfully reared on 5. oleae developed both on potato sprouts and Nerium Duration of Life-Cycle of oleander (DeBach 1964, Blumberg and Swirski Three Parasitic Hymenoptera 1977, Viggiani 1978). The study was carried out at 23±1°C, on Saissetia oleae (Bernard) 65-70% R.H. and 12 hours of artificial light per Growing on Two Different day. For each species, 3 potato sprouts and Host Plants' three plants of Nerium oleander in pots infested with S.oleae were placed in each 60x30x40 cm cage. The host insects were oviposited in M.V. MACROPODI by adult parasites introduced into the cages and left there for two days. The number of emerg­ ing adult parasites in each cage was recorded The Olive Institute of Corfu daily (a total number of adults emerged per 49100 Corfu, Greece cage varied from 23 to 195) and the time taken for 50% emergence was calculated from the correlation equation by plotting the cumulative In this work the duration of the life-cycle of percentage of adults emerged against time.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Scale Saissetia Oleae (Olivier, 1791)
    EENY620 Black Scale Saissetia oleae (Olivier 1791) (Insecta: Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Coccidae)1 Morgan A. Byron, Jennifer L. Gillett-Kaufman, and Sandra A. Allan2 Introduction Synonymy The black scale, Saissetia oleae (Olivier 1791) (Hemiptera: Coccus oleae Olivier (1791) (ITIS 2014) Coccidae) is an important pest of citrus and olive trees. Originally from South Africa, this scale is now distributed Distribution worldwide. In Florida, black scale is found on citrus (Citrus Black scale has a cosmopolitan distribution, with records in spp.), cultivated olive (Olea europaea L.), avocado (Persea Europe, Asia, Africa, Australasia, the Pacific Islands, and in americana Mill.), and many popular landscape plants. the Americas (CABI 1954). It is likely that black scale, like many invasive pests, was imported to the United States on infested nursery plants. Based on their small size and the unique life history of scale Biology insects, these insects are difficult to detect and control. Female black scales deposit eggs from April to September and, like other species in the genus Saissetia, protect them beneath the body until they hatch. Each female can lay from a few hundred to over 2,500 eggs (Tena et al. 2007). Incubation time for the eggs varies due to temperature, with eggs laid in the summer hatching in 16 days and eggs in the winter taking up to six weeks to hatch. Black scale typically has one or two generations per year, but three generations have been observed in certain regions. Reproduction is largely parthenogenetic (a type of asexual reproduction where eggs develop without fertilization), although males Figure 1. Adult female black scales, Saissetia oleae (Olivier) on have been reported.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genus Metaphycus Mercet (Hym.: Encyrtidae) of the Iranian Fauna with Description of a New Species
    North-Western Journal of Zoology Vol. 6, No. 2, 2010, pp.255-261 P-ISSN: 1584-9074, E-ISSN: 1843-5629 Article No.: 061124 The genus Metaphycus Mercet (Hym.: Encyrtidae) of the Iranian fauna with description of a new species Hosseinali LOTFALIZADEH Department of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research Center of Tabriz, Azarbaijan-e Sharghi, Iran. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. Eleven species of Metaphycus Mercet (Hym.: Chalcidoidea, Encyrtidae) are listed for Ira- nian fauna. A new record is presented and a new species is described as M. davoodii Lotfalizadeh sp. nov. reared from Coccus hesperidum L. (Hem.: Coccidae). Illustrations and discussion of affinities of the new species with its close relatives are presented. Key words: Metaphycus davoodii sp. nov., Encyrtidae, new species, Coccidae, parasitoid, Iran. Introduction by Zeya & Hayat (1993). Species of the Nearctic region were studied by Noyes & Hanson The Encyrtidae (Hym.: Chalcidoidea) is one of (1996). Recently, a review of European species the largest families within the Chalcidoidea (Guerrieri & Noyes 2000) has contributed to with approximately 4000 nominal species the knowledge of this genus in the Palaearctic among 483 genera classified in two subfamilies region. Species of this genus are typically pri- (Noyes 2010). Fallahzadeh and Japoshvili mary endoparasitoids that live on hemipterous (2010) listed 93 species in 32 genera of encyr- families Asterolecaniidae, Coccidae, Cerococ- tids for Iranian fauna and recently Lotfalizadeh cidae, Diaspididae, Eriococcidae, Keriidae, (2010) increased this list to 102 species, corrcet- Kermesidae, Pseudococcidae and Psyllidae ing some misidentifications and adding some (Hemiptera) (Myartseva 1988, Noyes & Han- new records. The genus Metaphycus Mercet, son 1996, Guerrieri & Noyes 2000, Guerrieri with about 452 species worldwide, is a speciose 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • 1.6 Parasitoids of Giant Whitefly
    UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Life Histories and Host Interaction Dynamics of Parasitoids Used for Biological Control of Giant Whitefly (Aleurodicus dugesii) Cockerell (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8020w7rd Author Schoeller, Erich Nicholas Publication Date 2018 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Life Histories and Host Interaction Dynamics of Parasitoids Used for Biological Control of Giant Whitefly (Aleurodicus dugesii) Cockerell (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomology by Erich Nicholas Schoeller March 2018 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Richard Redak, Chairperson Dr. Timothy Paine. Dr. Matthew Daugherty Copyright by Erich Nicholas Schoeller 2018 The Dissertation of Erich Nicholas Schoeller is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgements This dissertation was made possible with the kind support and help of many individuals. I would like to thank my advisors Drs. Richard Redak, Timothy Paine, and Matthew Daugherty for their wisdom and guidance. Their insightful comments and questions helped me become a better scientist and facilitated the development of quality research. I would particularly like to thank Dr. Redak for his endless patience and unwavering support throughout my degree. I wish to also thank Tom Prentice and Rebeccah Waterworth for their support and companionship. Their presence in the Redak Lab made my time there much more enjoyable. I would like to thank all of the property owners who kindly allowed me to work on their lands over the years, as well as the many undergraduate interns who helped me collect and analyze data from the experiments in this dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) of Saissetia Spp. (Homoptera: Coccidae) in Mexico
    Original article Parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) of Saissetia spp. (Homoptera: Coccidae) in Mexico Svetlana Nikolaevna MYARTSEVA, Enrique RUÍZ-CANCINO*, Juana María CORONADO-BLANCO División de Estudios Parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) of Saissetia spp. (Homoptera: de Postgrado e Investigación, Coccidae) in Mexico. UAM Agronomía y Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma Abstract –– Introduction. The genus Saissetia has 47 described species in the world, four of de Tamaulipas (UAT), them in Mexico (S. oleae, S. miranda, S. neglecta and S. tolucana). These species attack different 87149 Cd. Victoria, crops, including citrus, olives and ornamentals. Most introductions of natural enemies against Tamaulipas, S. oleae have been undertaken in North and South America, Australia and the Mediterranean México countries. However, no natural enemy species have been purposedly introduced into Mexico [email protected] against Saissetia spp. Materials and methods. During 1998–2003, samples of Saissetia spp. were collected in the States of Tamaulipas, Veracruz, Oaxaca and Guanajuato; all the emerged parasitoids were determined. Appropriate scientific publications were consulted to find out about any other Saissetia parasitoids recorded from Mexico. Results and discussion. Seventeen parasitoid species from five families of Chalcidoidea (Aphelinidae, Encyrtidae, Eupelmidae, Pte- romalidae and Signiphoridae) were reared from Saissetia spp. in Mexico. Conclusions. In Mexico, the species of Saissetia prefer ornamental plants and are usually heavily parasitized by several chalcidoids. Native biological control of Saissetia spp. by different parasitoids has been effective for many years in Mexico. As a result, the species of Saissetia are not considered as primary or secondary pests of citrus and ornamentals. Mexico / Saissetia / parasitoids / Hymenoptera / Chalcidoidea / inventories Parasitoïdes (Hymenoptères : Chalcidoidea) de Saissetia spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Searching Behaviour of Metaphycus Helvolus, (Compere) and Scutellista Cyanea, Motschulsky on Hemispherical Scale, S
    f\ .. ~ .. rJNIVERSI (I PERTAN! AYS, Pertanika 11(1),1-5 (1988) Searching Behaviour of Metaphycus helvolus, (Compere) and Scutellista cyanea, Motschulsky on Hemispherical Scale, S. coffeae (Walker) ABDUL GHANI IBRAHIM Department ofPlant Protection, Faculty ofAgriculture, Universiti Pertanian Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. Key words:' Metaphycus helvolus; Scutellista cyanea; Saissetia coffeae; temperature; host-searching. ABSTRAK Cara MetaphYC\ls h~l~olus dfz!! ;Sc\ltellista cyanea memburu perumah telah dikaji dalam dua ke­ adaan suhu tetap: 18°C and 26 Dc. Semasa memburu, kedua-dua parasit melibatkan aktiviti: menebuk badan mangsa, pengendalian, mencuci anggota (kepak, kaki dan sesungut), berjalan dan berehat. Meng­ hisap cecair badan perumah diamalkan oleh M. helvolus. S. cyanea menghabiskan lebih daripada lima puluh peratus masanya untuk berjalan mencari perumahnya pada kedua-dua suhu. M. helvolus pula menggunakan sebahagian besar masanya untuk tiga aktiviti: berjalan, menebuk perumah dan mencuci anggota. Masa yang ditumpu untuk menghisap cecair perumah oleh M. helvolus ialah kurang daripada 10 peratus. Kawasan memburu yang diliputi oleh M. helvolus dan S. cyanea pada suhu 26°C ialah 933 mm2/jam dan 3517 mm2/jam. ABSTRACT The host searching of Metaphycus helvolus and Scutellisa cyanea were studied under two different cons­ tant temperatures of18 °C and 26 °C. In the course ofhost-searching, both parasitoids were involved with host-drilling, handling, preening, walking and resting. Host-feeding only occurred with M. helvolus. S. cyanea spent more than fifty percent of the time walking at both temperatures. However, M. helvolus spent a greater proportion of time for three activities: walking, host-drilling and preening. The amount of time spent by M.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Enemies of Armored Scales (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) and Soft Scales (Hemiptera
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/429357; this version posted September 27, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Natural enemies of armored scales (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) and soft scales (Hemiptera: 2 Coccoidae) in Chile: molecular and morphological identification 3 4 Amouroux, P.1*; Crochard, D.2; Correa, M.C.G. 2,3; Groussier, G. 2; Kreiter, P. 2; Roman, C.4; 5 Guerrieri, E.5,6; Garonna, A.P.7; Malausa, T. 2 & Zaviezo, T1. 6 7 1 Departamento de Fruticultura y Enología, Facultad de Agronomía e Ingeniería Forestal, 8 Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile 9 2 Université Côte d'Azur, INRA, CNRS, ISA, France. 10 3 Centre for Molecular and Functional Ecology in Agroecosystems, Universidad de Talca, Talca, 11 Chile 12 4 Xilema-ANASAC Control Biológico, San Pedro, Quillota, Chile. 13 5 Istituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Portici 14 (NA), Italy 15 6 Department of Life Sciences, the Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom 16 7 Dipartimento di Agraria, Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”, Portici (NA), Italy. 17 18 * Corresponding author e-mail: 19 [email protected] (AP) 20 [email protected] (EG) 21 22 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/429357; this version posted September 27, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]
  • Metaphycusm Soft Scale Parasites (Under Development)
    MetaphycusM Soft scale parasites (under development) Biocontrol organism Metaphycus spp. There are many species of parasitoids in the genus Metaphycus. Some have been released as part of classical biological control programs in Australia. In the mid-1990s releases of Metaphycus lounsburyi (previously bartletti), a black scale parasite, were made throughout southern citrus-growing districts. Black scale diminished as a pest in these districts, so further releases were not considered necessary. Metaphycus luteolus, a vigorous parasite of soft brown scale, is at present in quarantine awaiting Plate 61: Metaphycus lounsburyi (formerly bartletti), an approval for release. It also parasitises second- imported parasite of black scale instar black scale. It is hoped this parasite will improve control of soft brown scale in citrus by aiding the range of beneficials presently estab- lished in the orchards. Metaphycus helvolus, an efficient parasite of soft brown scale and black scale, is mass reared and used successfully in release programs in California. This parasite is present in Australia and is under consideration for mass rearing. Metaphycus sp. n. (previously M. louns- buryi),which is not yet renamed, is also present in Australia, and was originally released for black scale control. It is also able to parasitise grapevine scale and is likely to be of use in wine Plate 62: Female Metaphycus helvolus, an efficient grapes.This species is also under consideration parasite of soft brown scale and black scale PARASITES 69 even kill the plants. More commonly they After release produce large amounts of sugary honeydew, leading to sooty mould which grows on Metaphycus can be detected after release by the honeydew.The sooty mould causes down- monitoring the appearance of the scale bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Saissetia Oleae (Hemiptera: Coccidae) on Citrus and Olives: Population Structure and Biological Control
    UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE VALENCIA Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Agrónomos Departamento de Ecosistemas Agroforestales Black scale Saissetia oleae (Hemiptera: Coccidae) on citrus and olives: population structure and biological control DOCTORAL THESIS Presented by: Alejandro Tena Barreda Directed by: Dr. Ferran Garcia Marí Valencia 2007 DEPARTAMENTO DE ECOSISTEMAS AGROFORESTALES E.T.S. INGENIEROS AGRÓNOMOS Universidad Politécnica Valencia Camino de Vera, s/n Telf.96-3879260 -Fax96-3879269 46022 VALÈNCIA El Dr. Ferran Garcia Marí, Catedrático de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia. CERTIFICA: Que la presente memoria titulada: “Black scale Saissetia oleae (Hemiptera: Coccidae) on citrus and olives: population structure and biological control”, realizado bajo mi dirección por D. Alejandro Tena Barreda, durante el periodo comprendido entre 2003 a 2007, constituye su Memoria de Tesis para optar al grado de Doctor, en el Departamento de Ecosistemas Agroforestales de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia. Para que así conste a todos los efectos oportunos, firma el presente certificado Fdo: Dr. Ferran Garcia Marí Valencia, Mayo 2007 Agradecimientos Nombrar a cuantos han hecho posible la realización de esta memoria es cuanto menos una pretensión descabellada, así como injusto es pretender resumir en una simple frase toda su aportación. Así pués, y sabiendo de antemano que pecaré por omisión, quisiera expresar mi más sincero agradeciemiento al Dr. Ferran Garcia Marí, el meu mestre, per qui sent admiració i respecte, per haver- me donat la seua confiança i l’oportunitat de realitzar la tesis baix la seua supervisió, per haver-me guiat, aconsellat, dedicat el seu temps i sobretot per haver-me transmès la riquesa de la seua experiència respectant sempre les meues idees.
    [Show full text]
  • Latin America and the Caribbean Regional Synthesis for the State of the World’S Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture
    REGIONAL SYNTHESIS REPORTS LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN REGIONAL SYNTHESIS FOR THE STATE OF THE WORLD’S BIODIVERSITY FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN REGIONAL SYNTHESIS FOR THE STATE OF THE WORLD’S BIODIVERSITY FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS ROME, 2019 Required citation: FAO. 2019. Latin America and the Caribbean Regional Synthesis for The State of the World’s Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca7125en. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-131991-8 © FAO, 2019 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/ legalcode/legalcode). Under the terms of this licence, this work may be copied, redistributed and adapted for non-commercial purposes, provided that the work is appropriately cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Coccophagus Scutellaris (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae): a Highly Effective Biological Control Agent of Soft Scale Insects (Hemiptera: Coccidae) in Egypt
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Psyche Volume 2011, Article ID 431874, 6 pages doi:10.1155/2011/431874 Research Article Coccophagus scutellaris (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae): A Highly Effective Biological Control Agent of Soft Scale Insects (Hemiptera: Coccidae) in Egypt Shaaban Abd-Rabou Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Dokki, Giza 12618, Egypt Correspondence should be addressed to Shaaban Abd-Rabou, [email protected] Received 10 February 2011; Revised 14 April 2011; Accepted 21 April 2011 Academic Editor: Ai-Ping Liang Copyright © 2011 Shaaban Abd-Rabou. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. About 953000 individuals of the cosmopolitan parasitoid, Coccophagus scutellaris (Dalman) (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), were released and evaluated during 2009-2010 for the control of the following soft scale insects (Hemiptera: Coccidae) infesting the following economic crops in Egypt: Ceroplastes rusci on citrus in Beni Seuf, Ceroplastes floridensis Comstock on citrus in Gharbiya, Coccus hesperidum L. on guava in Giza, Pulvinaria floccifera (Westwood) on mango in Sharqiya, Pulvinaria psidii Maskell on mango in Ismailia, Saissetia coffeae (Walker) on olive in Marsa Matruh, and Saissetia oleae (Oliver) on olive in the Northern Coast. The population of C. scutellaris showed a significant correlation with the build up of the population of the soft scale insects population in all of the release sites studied. The maximum rate of parasitism of the other species of parasitoids associated with soft scale insects at the release sites decreased after the release of C. scutellaris. 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Enemies in IPM Systems 145
    Natural Enemies in IPM Systems 145 THE IMPORTANCE OF NATURAL ENEMIES IN IPM SYSTEMS Notes I. Problems Resulting From Total Reliance on Pesticides A. Development of insecticide resistance in pest species 1. As of 1990, >500 cases of insecticide resistance had been reported in those species classified as pests. 2. Very few cases of resistance were reported in those species classified as natural enemies (<5% of total for pests). a. Predators are more tolerate to pesticides than parasitoids b. In the field, natural enemy mortality due to pesticide residues declines as residues degrade c. Susceptibility of a natural enemy may be a function of "area of discovery" d. Phytophagous species are more capable of developing resistance than natural enemies due to a variety of reasons (e.g., their continued adjustment to plant produced toxicants) 3. Populations of Amblyseius fallacis naturally developed resistance to over 15 organophosphate insecticides (Studies conducted by Brian Croft, Univ. of Oregon). 4. Laboratory strains of Metaseiulus (Typhlodromus) occidentalis were bred for resistance to carbaryl and permethrin (Studies conducted by Marjorie Hoy, UC-Berkeley). 5. Populations of Diglyphus begini naturally developed resistance to 2 carbamate and 2 pyrethroid insecticides (Studies conducted by Robin Rathman, Univ. of Hawaii). B. Resurgences of treated populations which are characterized by an abnormally rapid return of a pest to economic abundance after initial suppression by a pesticide which also destroyed the pest's natural enemies (which provided only partial control). C. Pest Upsets of secondary pests (secondary pest outbreaks) which are characterized by the rise to economic prominence of an insect which is relatively unaffected by a pesticide treatment for another insect pest, but whose normally efficient natural enemies are affected.
    [Show full text]