Wittenberg 2005 Invasive Species CH

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wittenberg 2005 Invasive Species CH An inventory of alien species and their threat to biodiversity and economy in Switzerland Mit deutscher Zusammenfassung Avec résumé en français CABI Bioscience Switzerland Centre report to The Swiss Agency for Environment, Forests and Landscape SAEFL Delémont, 2005 1 Reference Wittenberg, R. (ed.) (2005) An inventory of alien species and their threat to biodiversity and economy in Switzerland. CABI Bioscience Switzerland Centre report to the Swiss Agency for Environment, Forests and Landscape. Contributors : Rüdiger Wittenberg, CABI Bioscience Switzerland Centre, CH-2800 Delémont Marc Kenis, CABI Bioscience Switzerland Centre, CH-2800 Delémont Theo Blick, D-95503 Hummeltal Ambros Hänggi, Naturhistorisches Museum, CH-4001 Basel André Gassmann, CABI Bioscience Switzerland Centre, CH-2800 Delémont Ewald Weber, Geobotanical Institute, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, CH- 8044 Zürich 2 Frontispiece: common carp, Egyptian goose, raccoon, giant hogweed. All photos Rüdiger Wittenberg, CABI Bioscience, Delémont. 3 4 Contents Contents .........................................................................................................................5 List of Fact sheets......................................................................................................7 List of figures ............................................................................................................9 List of tables..............................................................................................................9 Abstracts ......................................................................................................................11 Summary......................................................................................................................13 Zusammenfassung........................................................................................................16 Résumé.........................................................................................................................19 1 Introduction..............................................................................................................23 Definitions...............................................................................................................24 Invasive alien species – a global overview .............................................................24 Status of alien species in Switzerland .....................................................................26 Pathways..................................................................................................................27 Impacts of invasive alien species ............................................................................27 Discussion ...............................................................................................................28 Recommendations ...................................................................................................29 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................30 References ...............................................................................................................31 2 Vertebrates – Vertebrata ..........................................................................................33 Mammals – Mammalia............................................................................................33 Birds – Aves............................................................................................................40 Reptiles – Reptilia...................................................................................................47 Amphibians – Amphibia .........................................................................................50 Fish – Pisces............................................................................................................52 References ...............................................................................................................59 Fact Sheets...............................................................................................................62 3 Crustaceans – Crustacea ........................................................................................107 References .............................................................................................................112 Fact Sheets.............................................................................................................114 4 Insects – Insecta .....................................................................................................131 Introduction ...........................................................................................................131 Coleoptera .............................................................................................................132 Lepidoptera............................................................................................................134 Hymenoptera .........................................................................................................135 Diptera...................................................................................................................136 Hemiptera..............................................................................................................137 Orthoptera..............................................................................................................138 Dictyoptera............................................................................................................138 Isoptera..................................................................................................................139 Thysanoptera .........................................................................................................139 Psocoptera .............................................................................................................139 5 Ectoparasites..........................................................................................................140 References .............................................................................................................140 Fact Sheets.............................................................................................................146 5 Spiders and Allies – Arachnida..............................................................................213 Introduction ...........................................................................................................213 List of species........................................................................................................214 Species of natural habitats.....................................................................................215 Species in, and in close proximity to, human buildings........................................217 Greenhouse-inhabiting species..............................................................................218 ‘Banana spiders’ and terrarium species.................................................................218 Discussion and recommendations .........................................................................219 References .............................................................................................................220 Fact Sheets.............................................................................................................223 6 Molluscs – Mollusca..............................................................................................231 Snails and slugs (Gastropoda)...............................................................................231 Bivalves (Bivalvia)................................................................................................232 References .............................................................................................................238 Fact Sheets.............................................................................................................239 7 Other selected invertebrate groups.........................................................................249 Nematodes – Nemathelminthes.............................................................................249 Flatworms – Turbellaria, Plathelminthes ..............................................................249 Segmented worms – Annelida...............................................................................250 Centipedes and millipedes – Myriapoda ...............................................................250 References .............................................................................................................250 Fact Sheets.............................................................................................................251 8 Lichens (Lichen-forming fungi) ............................................................................257 References .............................................................................................................257 9 Fungi and a selected bacterium..............................................................................259 References .............................................................................................................260 Fact Sheets.............................................................................................................261 10 Plants – Planta......................................................................................................277
Recommended publications
  • Reptile Pets Shuttle Grasshopper Allergy and Asthma Into Homes Erika Jensen-Jarolim1,2*, Isabella Pali-Schöll1,2, Sebastian A.F
    Jensen-Jarolim et al. World Allergy Organization Journal (2015) 8:24 DOI 10.1186/s40413-015-0072-1 journal REVIEW Open Access Caution: Reptile pets shuttle grasshopper allergy and asthma into homes Erika Jensen-Jarolim1,2*, Isabella Pali-Schöll1,2, Sebastian A.F. Jensen3, Bruno Robibaro3,4 and Tamar Kinaciyan5 Abstract The numbers of reptiles in homes has at least doubled in the last decade in Europe and the USA. Reptile purchases are increasingly triggered by the attempt to avoid potentially allergenic fur pets like dogs and cats. Consequently, reptiles are today regarded as surrogate pets initiating a closer relationship with the owner than ever previously observed. Reptile pets are mostly fed with insects, especially grasshoppers and/or locusts, which are sources for aggressive airborne allergens, best known from occupational insect breeder allergies. Exposure in homes thus introduces a new form of domestic allergy to grasshoppers and related insects. Accordingly, an 8-year old boy developed severe bronchial hypersensitivity and asthma within 4 months after purchase of a bearded dragon. The reptile was held in the living room and regularly fed with living grasshoppers. In the absence of a serological allergy diagnosis test, an IgE immunoblot on grasshopper extract and prick-to-prick test confirmed specific sensitization to grasshoppers. After 4 years of allergen avoidance, a single respiratory exposure was sufficient to trigger a severe asthma attack again in the patient. Based on literature review and the clinical example we conclude that reptile keeping is associated with introducing potent insect allergens into home environments. Patient interviews during diagnostic procedure should therefore by default include the question about reptile pets in homes.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Study on the Various Species of Locusts with Special
    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2016; 4(6): 38-45 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 Comparative study on the various species of locusts JEZS 2016; 4(6): 38-45 © 2016 JEZS with special reference to its population fluctuation Received: 07-09-2016 Accepted: 08-10-2016 from Thar Desert, Sindh Ahmed Ali Samejo Department of Zoology, University of Sindh, Jamshoro- Ahmed Ali Samejo and Riffat Sultana Pakistan Abstract Riffat Sultana Thar Desert is most favorable for life of human throughout the deserts of the world. It is rain fed land, Department of Zoology, some patches are cultivated by farmers in the form of fields for producing sources of economy, other University of Sindh, Jamshoro- Pakistan large part of desert remains untouched for natural vegetation for livestock, but unfortunately little yield of desert is also affected by variety of insect including locusts. During present study four species of locusts; belonging to four genera Anacridium, Cyrtacanthacris, Locusta and Schistocerca, two subfamilies Cyrtacanthacridinae and Oedipodenae and one family Acrididae were reported from Thar Desert from June 2015 to May 2016. Comparative study revealed that two species Schistocerca gregaria and Locusta migratoria are swarming and destructive while, Anacridium aegyptium and Cyrtacanthacridinae tatarica are non-swarming but are larger in body size and graze more vegetation than both swarming species. Though these four species have ecological and morphological difference but the nature of damage is almost similar. All these species were recorded as pest of foliage of all crops and natural vegetation. Keywords: Comparative morphology, geographic distribution, locusts, Thar Desert, damage to useful plants 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesser Mealworm, Litter Beetle, Alphitobius Diaperinus (Panzer) (Insecta: Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)1 James C
    EENY-367 Lesser Mealworm, Litter Beetle, Alphitobius diaperinus (Panzer) (Insecta: Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)1 James C. Dunford and Phillip E. Kaufman2 Introduction encountered in stored products (Green 1980). The other known species in the United States, A. laevigatus (Fabricius) The lesser mealworm, Alphitobius diaperinus (Panzer), is or black fungus beetle, is less commonly encountered and a cosmopolitan general stored products pest of particular may also vector pathogens and parasites and occasionally importance as a vector and competent reservoir of several cause damage to poultry housing. poultry pathogens and parasites. It can also cause damage to poultry housing and is suspected to be a health risk to humans in close contact with larvae and adults. Adults can become a nuisance when they move en masse toward artificial lights generated by residences near fields where beetle-infested manure has been spread (Axtell 1999). Alphitobius diaperinus inhabits poultry droppings and litter and is considered a significant pest in the poultry industry. Numerous studies have been conducted on lesser meal- worm biology, physiology, and management. Lambkin (2001) conducted a thorough review of relevant scientific literature in reference to A. diaperinus and provides a good understanding of the biology, ecology and bionomics of the pest. Bruvo et al. (1995) conducted molecular work to determine satellite DNA variants on the chromosomes of A. diaperinus. Alphitobius diaperinus is a member of the tenebrionid tribe Alphitobiini (Doyen 1989), which comprises four genera worldwide (Aalbu et al. 2002). Two genera occur Figure 1. Adult male lesser mealworm, Alphitobius diaperinus (Panzer). in the United States, of which there are two species in the This specimen taken from Henderson County, North Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Chloroplast Genomes Shed Light on Phylogenetic
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Complete chloroplast genomes shed light on phylogenetic relationships, divergence time, and biogeography of Allioideae (Amaryllidaceae) Ju Namgung1,4, Hoang Dang Khoa Do1,2,4, Changkyun Kim1, Hyeok Jae Choi3 & Joo‑Hwan Kim1* Allioideae includes economically important bulb crops such as garlic, onion, leeks, and some ornamental plants in Amaryllidaceae. Here, we reported the complete chloroplast genome (cpDNA) sequences of 17 species of Allioideae, fve of Amaryllidoideae, and one of Agapanthoideae. These cpDNA sequences represent 80 protein‑coding, 30 tRNA, and four rRNA genes, and range from 151,808 to 159,998 bp in length. Loss and pseudogenization of multiple genes (i.e., rps2, infA, and rpl22) appear to have occurred multiple times during the evolution of Alloideae. Additionally, eight mutation hotspots, including rps15-ycf1, rps16-trnQ-UUG, petG-trnW-CCA , psbA upstream, rpl32- trnL-UAG , ycf1, rpl22, matK, and ndhF, were identifed in the studied Allium species. Additionally, we present the frst phylogenomic analysis among the four tribes of Allioideae based on 74 cpDNA coding regions of 21 species of Allioideae, fve species of Amaryllidoideae, one species of Agapanthoideae, and fve species representing selected members of Asparagales. Our molecular phylogenomic results strongly support the monophyly of Allioideae, which is sister to Amaryllioideae. Within Allioideae, Tulbaghieae was sister to Gilliesieae‑Leucocoryneae whereas Allieae was sister to the clade of Tulbaghieae‑ Gilliesieae‑Leucocoryneae. Molecular dating analyses revealed the crown age of Allioideae in the Eocene (40.1 mya) followed by diferentiation of Allieae in the early Miocene (21.3 mya). The split of Gilliesieae from Leucocoryneae was estimated at 16.5 mya.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaderni Del Museo Civico Di Storia Naturale Di Ferrara
    ISSN 2283-6918 Quaderni del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Ferrara Anno 2018 • Volume 6 Q 6 Quaderni del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Ferrara Periodico annuale ISSN. 2283-6918 Editor: STEFA N O MAZZOTT I Associate Editors: CARLA CORAZZA , EM A N UELA CAR I A ni , EN R ic O TREV is A ni Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Ferrara, Italia Comitato scientifico / Advisory board CE S ARE AN DREA PA P AZZO ni FI L ipp O Picc OL I Università di Modena Università di Ferrara CO S TA N ZA BO N AD im A N MAURO PELL I ZZAR I Università di Ferrara Ferrara ALE ss A N DRO Min ELL I LU ci O BO N ATO Università di Padova Università di Padova MAURO FA S OLA Mic HELE Mis TR I Università di Pavia Università di Ferrara CARLO FERRAR I VALER I A LE nci O ni Università di Bologna Museo delle Scienze di Trento PI ETRO BRA N D M AYR CORRADO BATT is T I Università della Calabria Università Roma Tre MAR C O BOLOG N A Nic KLA S JA nss O N Università di Roma Tre Linköping University, Sweden IRE N EO FERRAR I Università di Parma In copertina: Fusto fiorale di tornasole comune (Chrozophora tintoria), foto di Nicola Merloni; sezione sottile di Micrite a foraminiferi planctonici del Cretacico superiore (Maastrichtiano), foto di Enrico Trevisani; fiore di digitale purpurea (Digitalis purpurea), foto di Paolo Cortesi; cardo dei lanaioli (Dipsacus fullonum), foto di Paolo Cortesi; ala di macaone (Papilio machaon), foto di Paolo Cortesi; geco comune o tarantola (Tarentola mauritanica), foto di Maurizio Bonora; occhio della sfinge del gallio (Macroglossum stellatarum), foto di Nicola Merloni; bruco della farfalla Calliteara pudibonda, foto di Maurizio Bonora; piumaggio di pernice dei bambù cinese (Bambusicola toracica), foto dell’archivio del Museo Civico di Lentate sul Seveso (Monza).
    [Show full text]
  • Relative and Seasonal Abundance of Beneficial Arthropods in Centipedegrass As Influenced by Management Practices
    HORTICULTURAL ENTOMOLOGY Relative and Seasonal Abundance of Beneficial Arthropods in Centipedegrass as Influenced by Management Practices S. KRISTINE BRAMAN AND ANDREW F. PENDLEY Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, College of Agriculture Experiment Stations, Georgia Station, Griffin, GA 30223 J. Econ. Entomol. 86(2): 494-504 (1993) ABSTRACT Pitfall traps were used to monitor the seasonal activity of arthropod preda­ tors, parasitoids, and decomposers in replicated plots of centipedegrass turf for 3 yr (1989-1991) at two locations. During 1990 and 1991, the influence of single or combined herbicide, insecticide, and fertilizer applications on these beneficials was assessed. In total, 21 species of carabids in 13 genera and 17 species of staphylinids in 14 genera were represented in pitfall-trap collections. Nonsminthurid collembolans, ants, spiders, and parasitic Hymenoptera were adversely affected in the short term by insecticide applica­ tions targeting the twolined spittlebug, Prosapia bicincta (Say). Other taxa, notably orib­ atid Acari, increased over time in response to pesticide or fertilizer applications. Although various taxa were reduced by pesticide application during three of four sample intervals, a lack ofoverall differences in season totals suggests that the disruptive influence ofcertain chemical management practices may be less severe than expected in the landscape. KEY WORDS Arthropoda, centipedegrass, nontarget effects CENTIPEDEGRASS, Eremochloa ophiuroides Potter 1983, Arnold & Potter 1987, Potter et al. (Munro) Hack, a native of China and Southeast 1990b, Vavrek & Niemczyk 1990). Asia introduced into the United States in 1916, Studies characterizing the beneficial arthropod has become widely grown from South Carolina community and assessing effects of management to Florida and westward along the Gulf Coast practices on those invertebrates are especially states to Texas (DubIe 1989).
    [Show full text]
  • Intercepted Silvanidae [Insecta: Coleoptera] from the International Falls, MN [USA] Port-Of-Entry
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 51 Numbers 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 2018 Numbers Article 2 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 2018 August 2018 Intercepted Silvanidae [Insecta: Coleoptera] From The International Falls, MN [USA] Port-Of-Entry Gary D. Ouellette United States Department of Agriculture-APHIS-PPQ, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Ouellette, Gary D. 2018. "Intercepted Silvanidae [Insecta: Coleoptera] From The International Falls, MN [USA] Port-Of-Entry," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 51 (1) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol51/iss1/2 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Ouellette: Intercepted Silvanidae [Insecta: Coleoptera] From The International Falls, MN [USA] Port-Of-Entry 2018 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 5 Intercepted Silvanidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) from the International Falls, MN (U.S.A.) Port of Entry Gary D. Ouellette USDA-APHIS-PPQ, 3600 E. Paisano Dr., El Paso, TX 79905. email: [email protected] Abstract Silvanidae species recorded in association with imported commodities, at United States ports-of-entry, have not been comprehensively studied. The present study examines the species of beetles of the family Silvanidae intercepted during agricultural quarantine inspections at the International Falls, MN port-of-entry. A total of 244 beetles representing two subfamilies, three genera, and four species of Silvanidae were collected between June 2016 and June 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Inventory and Assessment Report, Fall 2018 Caltech Submillimeter Observatory, Maunakea, Hawai‘I
    Biological Inventory and Assessment Report, Fall 2018 Caltech Submillimeter Observatory, Maunakea, Hawai‘i Action BoardApril 2019 Prepared for: Sustainable Resources Group Intn’l, Inc. Prepared by: Matthew J Medeiros, PhD [email protected] mattjmedeiros.comFor All photographs in this report are copyrighted by Matthew J Medeiros. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Caltech Submillimeter Observatory Decommissioning ................................................................ 1 1.2 Physical Setting ............................................................................................................................. 1 2 METHODS ........................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Permit and Personnel .................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Schedule ........................................................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Nomenclature ................................................................................................................................ 3 2.4 Methodology for Inventorying Plants, Lichens, Non-arthropod Animals, and Abiotic Features . 3 2.4.1 Transects: Floral and Abiotic Features ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Invasive Species Action Plan
    Oregon Invasive Species Action Plan June 2005 Martin Nugent, Chair Wildlife Diversity Coordinator Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife PO Box 59 Portland, OR 97207 (503) 872-5260 x5346 FAX: (503) 872-5269 [email protected] Kev Alexanian Dan Hilburn Sam Chan Bill Reynolds Suzanne Cudd Eric Schwamberger Risa Demasi Mark Systma Chris Guntermann Mandy Tu Randy Henry 7/15/05 Table of Contents Chapter 1........................................................................................................................3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 What’s Going On?........................................................................................................................................ 3 Oregon Examples......................................................................................................................................... 5 Goal............................................................................................................................................................... 6 Invasive Species Council................................................................................................................. 6 Statute ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 Functions .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Entomopathogens of Anacridium Aegyptium L. in Crete1
    I-NTOMOl.OGIA HEI.I.F.NICA 14 (2001-2002): 5-10 Entomopathogens of Anacridium aegyptium L. in Crete1 N. E. RODITAKIS2, D. KOLLAROS3 and A. LEGAKIS3 2NAGREF-Plant Protection Institute Heraclion Crete, 710 03 Katsabas, Heraclion -'Department of Biology University of Crete ABSTRACT The entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria tassiana (Bals.) Vuil. was recorded for the first time on Anacridium aegyptium L. in Crete. The insects were fed on pieces of leaf subjected to a serial dilution of spores over three to four orders of magnitute. Comparative studies on the virulence of ß. bassiana (I 91612 local isolate) and Metarhizium anisopliae var. acridum (IMI 330189 standard isolate of IIBC) showed that M. anisopliae var. acridum was more virulent than B. bassiana at a conidial concentration lower or equal to 106 per ml while they were similarly virulent on first stage nymphs at 107 conidia per ml. Introduction 40 ind./ha) in winter that reaches much higher lev­ els during some summers. The reasons of these A three year study ( 1990-1992) was started on lo­ sporadic outbreaks remain unknown. By contrast custs in Crete aiming to study Cretan acridofauna, it is always harmful on field vegetables in Chan­ including species composition and their seasonal dras, Sitia (East Crete) so the local Agricultural abundance on main crops, harmful species and Advisory Services suggests extensive control native biological agents. Grapes are the second measures based on insecticides. crop in order of importance of Cretan agriculture. Crop losses dued to locust Anacridium aegyptium It is known that microbial agents such as the had been noticed on certain locations in Crete in entomopathogenic fungi cause epizootics affect­ the past (Roditakis 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Forensic Importance of Edaphic Fauna After the Removal of a Corpse
    J Forensic Sci, 2010 doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01506.x CASE REPORT Available online at: interscience.wiley.com PATHOLOGY⁄BIOLOGY Marta I. SaloÇa,1 Ph.D.; M. Lourdes Moraza,2 Ph.D.; Miguel Carles-Tolr,3 Ph.D.; Victor Iraola,4 Ph.D.; Pablo Bahillo,5 Ph.D.; Toms Ylamos,6 Ph.D.; Raimundo Outerelo,7 Ph.D.; and Rafael Alcaraz,8 M.D. Searching the Soil: Forensic Importance of Edaphic Fauna After the Removal of a Corpse ABSTRACT: Arthropods at different stages of development collected from human remains in an advanced stage of decomposition (following autopsy) and from the soil at the scene are reported. The corpse was found in a mixed deciduous forest of Biscay (northern Spain). Soil fauna was extracted by sieving the soil where the corpse lay and placing the remains in Berlese–Tullgren funnels. Necrophagous fauna on the human remains was dominated by the fly Piophilidae: Stearibia nigriceps (Meigen, 1826), mites Ascidae: Proctolaelaps epuraeae (Hirschmann, 1963), Laelapidae: Hypoaspis (Gaeolaelaps) aculeifer (Canestrini, 1884), and the beetle Cleridae: Necrobia rufipes (de Geer, 1775). We confirm the importance of edaphic fauna, especially if the deceased is discovered in natural environs. Related fauna may remain for days after corpse removal and reveal infor- mation related to the circumstances of death. The species Nitidulidae: Omosita depressa (Linnaeus, 1758), Acaridae: Sancassania berlesei (Michael, 1903), Ascidae: Zerconopsis remiger (Kramer, 1876) and P. epuraeae, Urodinychidae: Uroobovella pulchella (Berlese, 1904), and Macrochelidae:
    [Show full text]
  • Allium Paradoxum (M.Bieb.) G. Don (Amaryllidaceae) – a New Invasive Plant Species for the Flora of Baltic States
    Acta Biol. Univ. Daugavp. 20 (1) 2020 ISSN 1407 - 8953 ALLIUM PARADOXUM (M.BIEB.) G. DON (AMARYLLIDACEAE) – A NEW INVASIVE PLANT SPECIES FOR THE FLORA OF BALTIC STATES Pēteris Evarts-Bunders, Aiva Bojāre Evarts-Bunders P., Bojāre A. 2020. Allium paradoxum (M. Bieb.) G. Don – a new invasive plant species for the flora of Baltic States.Acta Biol. Univ. Daugavp., 20 (1): 55 – 60. Allium paradoxum (M. Bieb.) G. Don was recorded as a new species for the flora of Latvia and the Baltic States on the basis of plant material first collected by A. Bojāre and P. Evarts-Bunders in 2020. Relatively large population of this species was found in Rīga, in the Rumbula district (Eastern border of the city), on the slope of the river Daugava covered by natural vegetation, but near the private gardens zone and ruderal places. This species can be easily distinguished from other Allium species by one flat, 5-25 mm wide, keeled leaf per bulb, inflorescence with several bulbils and mostly with only one flower. The species is considered as invasive and spreading by means of bulbils. In Latvia the species has been identified in their typical habitat – disturbed forest and shrubland along the riverbank on damp soil. Key words: Allium paradoxum, Latvia, Baltic States, invasive plant, flora. Pēteris Evarts-Bunders. Institute of Life Sciences and Technology, Daugavpils University, Parādes str., 1A, Daugavpils, LV-5401, Latvia; [email protected] Aiva Bojāre. National Botanical garden, Dendroflora Department, Miera Str., 1, Salaspils, LV-2169, Latvia; [email protected] INTRODUCTION There are seven species of sedge occurring in the wild in Latvia – Allium angulosum Allium L.
    [Show full text]