INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS REVIEW ISSN 0019 0268

To Our Readers

Regular readers of "IPA Review" will notice the journals new improved format. We have decided to take this step, not only because it allows a better presentation of ideas, but because it will assist in our new policy of selling "Review" through commercial outlets. In order to assist us in taking this major step we have combined the Autumn and Winter editions into a single larger issue. The "Review" will continue to be issued on a quarterly basis. The new look "Review" is just one of our recent initiatives. In addition to "Facts; IPA subscribers also receive exclusively our new series of publications, "Policy Issues" We will also be issuing a series of occasional papers during the coming year. These initiatives reflect major advances in the activities and research interests of the Institute. Those of you who are reading the "Review"for the first time may wish to return the subscription form located inside. This will enable you to receive the full range of our publications.

Rod Kemp, Editor. Contents

Editorial The New Privileged 3

Commentary Tax Reform; have the Liberals missed the real , issue? 5 Budgetary Restraint 5 Media: who watches the public watchdog? 6

Government Expenditure Government Expenditure Can Be Cut 8 John Stone Limiting Government Spending 11 Peter Samuel

Regulation The Two-Airline Policy 15 Professor David Starkie

Industrial Relations Department of Unemployment 18 Dr. Gerard Henderson Unleashing the Unions, Tying Up Management 20 Peter Costello Workers Control 23 Barry Maley

Youth and Education Youth Ditches the Left 28 Greg Sheridan `Work, Discipline and Emulation 31 Special Correspondent

Research Report Four Corners: the Pattern of Bias 34 Dr. Ken Baker

Special Supplement Peter Graces War on Government Waste

Focus on Figures The Trilogy; Cutting the Size of Government; 43 Public Sector Inflation; Government Income Recipients Jacob A bra hami

Historical Document John Curtin and the American Alliance 46

Follow-Up The Bicentenary Controversy 49 John Reid and Ken Baker Telecom and Competition 55 R.W. Brack and Chris Trengove Contributors

Jacob Abrabami: The IPAs Senior Economist. He has lectured at University. His main academic interests are in the areas of income distribution and public finance.

Dr. Ken Baker: Research Fellow with the IPA. His research interests centre on the media and the sociology of culture.

R.W. Brack: Chairman of Australian Telecommunications Commission since 1981.

Peter Costello: Member of the Victorian Bar Council practising in the area of industrial relations.

Dr. Gerard Henderson: Senior adviser to the Shadow Treasurer, John Howard, and formerly a principal executive officer with the Department of Employment and Industrial Relations. His publications include `The Industrial Relations Club, Quadrant, September, 1983.

Barry Maley: Senior Lecturer in organisational behaviour in the Faculty of Commerce at the University of N.S.W. His publications include research into the sociology of the professions and organisational behaviour.

John Reid: Chairman of the Australian Bicentennial Authority and Director of a number of major Australian companies.

Peter Samuel: Special Washington correspondent for News Limited, and formerly economics editor of the Canberra Times and a correspondent and columnist for The Bulletin for 15 years.

Greg Sheridan: Journalist with The Australian newspaper, where he writes leaders and political features. For five years he was staff writer with The Bulletin.

David Starkie: Professorial Fellow in the Department of Economics at the University of Adelaide.

John Stone: Former Secretary to the Treasury and Senior IPA Fellow.

Chris Trengove: Research Fellow at the Centre of Policy Studies, Monash University. His work has concentrated on public enterprises, regulation, telecommunications, energy and resources. EDITORIAL The New Privileged A dilemma for the ALP

Many observers have commented on a shift to privileges serve mainly the interests of trade the right in Australian society. There are union leaders themselves. They include legal certainly indications of a changing attitude monopoly rights to claim employees of a towards the role of government, but to regard particular trade as members, effective rights to this as a move to the right seems to miss the main break contracts without penalty, and, under the point. Accord, virtual veto power over economic and What seems to be true is that this changing tax policy. People are increasingly asking where mood expresses disillusionment with a number the real government in Australia resides --- in the of aspects of the Corporate Welfare State: Cabinet Room or in the trade union hierarchy. • governments perceived failure to consistently The special privileges of the public service represent the public interest over and above include job security, working conditions and the clamour of powerful special interest retirement benefits unparalleled in the private lobbies; sector, and access to government to influence • the feeling that in the Corporate State of Big policy in their own interests. These privileges can Government, Big Unions and Big Business the be sustained only by the willingness of individual no longer counts; governments to raise the taxes necessary to • the increasingly common observation that finance the imperial ambitions of the public many of the benefits of government sector. intervention in the name of social justice, Although private enterprise retains some compassion or equality go to the highly paid privileges in the form of government assistance, professionals appointed to administer and limited liability and property rights, these rights, carry out government policies; as Barry Maley points out in his article in this • and, most important, the emergence of a new Review, "Workers Control", are being rapidly stratum of privilege in the society composed eroded. of government employees and trade unions: Some public service privileges may be the rhetoric of the corporate Welfare State - justified in the public interest (for example, consensus and compassion — is increasingly tenure for judges), but what we are seeing at the seen as a rationalisation for the power and moment is the massive growth of privilege in interests of the "new privileged" - trade union institutions simply because they are powerful leaders and public servants. and have direct access to government. This is not If anything, the mood is against established only unjust but is damaging to the well-being of government institutions and privileged groups in Australians. By maintaining the privileges of the community. It is for restoring power and these groups government is finding it impossible status to the consumer, the small business man, to tackle the major source of poverty in the the unemployed and elderly. These are hardly the community — unemployment. classical ingredients of a right-wing revolt. Employment opportunities in the private sector are diminished by the ever-increasing tax Union and Public Service Power burden needed to finance the government sector. The power of trade unions has grievously Trade unions have never been so powerful as harmed the economy, condemned many they are today. The unions have privileges employees to unemployment and interfered with granted to no other institution and these the freedom of individuals. The unions labour EDITORIAL market privileges have produced perhaps the left without adequate representation. Ironically, most inflexible labour market in the Western this creates opportunities for the other political World and must be seen as a major continuing parties to put themselves forward as cause of Australias slow growth and representatives of the little man, the average unemployment. Australian, and to defend him against This stratum of privilege in society, exploitation by powerful self-serving interest composed of public service professionals and groups. powerful union bureaucrats, is tending to use the Something similar to this seems to have Labor Party as its political wing. The dilemma taken place in the United States. Increasingly the this poses for the ALP is that its traditional U.S. Democratic Party, once the Party of the commitment to the weak, the powerless, and the downtrodden, is seen as the spokesman for underprivileged, and its traditional distaste for special interest lobbies and the Republican Party privilege in any form has been replaced by an (the traditional defender of powerful interests) is apparent commitment to defending a new layer being seen as the voice of the public interest. of privilege. The task before Mr. Hawke, if the Labor As a consequence the ordinary working Party is not to lose its credibility, is to revive the man, ,the taxpayer who pays for the public sector, Partys traditional ideal of representing the the unemployed and the disadvantaged are being interests of the common man.

UNDERSTANDING TAX REFORM by Mr. John Harrowell, FCA (formerly National President, Institute of Chartered Accountants and Member of the Taxation Board of Review)

— a detailed explanation of why fundamental tax reform is necessary, and — a proposed new integrated tax system for Australia

(a modified, expanded and up-dated version of the Authors "Outline" of a new system published in February 1984)

Order your copy now: Institute of Public Affairs (NSW) Price: $4.95 (including postage) 4th Floor, 56 Young Street, Sydney, 2000. Tel: (02) 231 4755 IPA COMMENTARY

size of government and policies to reduce Tax Reform: Have the spending is in the process of being missed. Liberals missed the As Peter Samuel points out in his article in this Review, "Limiting Government Spending", real issue? there is a very healthy debate in the United States Whatever the benefits of widening the tax base on how the spending ambitions of governments by imposing an across-the-board consumer tax, can be restrained. Indeed the most visible policy it has the serious defect of enabling governments on expenditure limitation in Australia comes to turn on the tax tap with ease. from the Labor Party, Mr. Hawkes trilogy. The Peter Robinson in his column "Candid Liberal Party should be pointing out the Comment" (The Sun-Herold, June 2, 1985) dangers, as well as any advantages, in widening noted: the tax base. "You do not have to be unduly cynical to One approach for the Liberal Party would perceive that once all this is in place, any be to insist on indexation of income tax brackets. Federal Government is sitting pretty. Not only Another proposal would be to incorporate the does it have a taxation structure which is essence of Mr. Hawkes Trilogy in legislation. For indexed precisely for inflation (some of it example, the real growth in tax revenues could be arising from the effects of taxation) but it also limited to say 2 per cent per annum in real terms. has great flexibility in deciding when and This would help ensure that revenues do not where to boost its revenue. grow faster than the economy as a whole, "One year, it might decide to add half a (provided Australia continues the growth trends per cent to the general consumption tax. (Half of recent years). Any excess revenue could be a per cent! What a modest demand. Who returned to the taxpayer through a tax cut in the could do more than raise a passing grumble?) following year. "Next year, it could put in an The political parties should be Iooking infinitesimal increase in income tax. After all, towards correcting the dangerous institutional you lucky Australians now have one of the bias in our system towards bigger and bigger lowest personal income tax rates in the world government. The Americans are looking towards (it could argue), a slight increase wont hurt constitutional expenditure limitation anyone, will it?" arrangements. A debate along these lines has not Terry McCrann, Associate Business Editor, yet started in Australia. The Age, supports a similar line (5/6/85): The growth of government expenditure "The so-called Hawke-Keating preferred should be the central issue in any tax reform option does nothing for genuine tax reform, package. As yet it has not being convincingly but gives this and any future government a addressed by any political party. new means of revenue via the consumption tax". Budgetary Restraint: The While the Liberal Party is supporting the general thrust of the Keating proposal, it has problems of compound noticeably failed to come out with an expenditure limitation programme. It is ironical growth that the Party which emphasises smaller Mr. Keatings mini-budget which cut government has a tax programme but not an approximately $1.3 billion from the forward effective and marketable programme to reduce estimates (just under 2 per cent of outlays) has government spending. Indeed a golden received a pass mark from most commentators. opportunity to promote the whole issue of the Likewise the Premiers Conference, which held

to IPA COMMENTARY the Commonwealth revenue grants to the States the two budgets) Mr. Keating is now facing the to almost zero growth in real terms, has also problems arising from compound growth. attracted favourable comment. Overall it appears that the growth in budget outlays this year will be around 2 per cent — well Media: Who watches the below the levels of the previous Keating budgets. The fiscal problems confronting Mr. public watchdog? Keating — notably the huge deficit (now being Yet another survey has revealed the mistrust of estimated at around $6.5 billion for 1985/86) - the public for the press. This time the survey, are largely the result of the lack of discipline conducted in the United States, was comissioned exercised in the first two Hawke budgets. In the by a leading press body, the American Society of first budget, outlays grew by 7.7 per cent in real Newspaper Editors — hence its importance. The terms; in the second by 6.1 per cent. results indicate, among other things: If Mr. Keating had been able to hold • 63 per cent of people feel the press place too spending to a 2 per cent growth rate in his earlier much emphasis on what is wrong with budgets (the average of the previous seven years) America. the prospective deficit this year, as indicated in • 71 per cent believe that accused people are the table below, would be only $154 million. And frequently convicted in the press. on the basis of reasonable assumptions he would • 60 per cent disapprove of the use of be happily contemplating a budget surplus in anonymous sources 1985 -86. In short, if Mr. Keating had been able • 47 per cent think that once a newspaper to impose reasonable fiscal discipline earlier on endorses a political candidate it stops being he would not now be contending with a serious fair to others in an election. budgetary problem. These findings were reported by the In the table below the growth of outlays President of the Associated Press, Louis from the actual 1982/83 figure is projected on Boccardi, at a conference marking 50 years of the basis of inflation plus 2 per cent real growth. Australian Associated Press. He also estimates The receipts column in the table has been taken that over 80 per cent of jury verdicts in libel from the budget papers for 1983/84 and cases go against the press. 1984/85. The growth in receipts for 1985/86 has The problem is, at least in part, one of been estimated at a conservative 9.3 per cent. accountability. The press has claimed the Under these assumptions, as the table shows, position of public watchdog, demanding Australias deficit problem would have accountability from other institutions in society, disappeared by 1985/86. but usually rejecting such demands on itself as an infringement of press freedom. The publicly- A More Responsible Budget Outcome owned media, such as the ABC, have been Deficit/ Deficit particularly unresponsive to demands for Outlays Receipts Surplus (Actual) accountability, as Ken Baker illustrates in his 1982/83 48,935 44,462 —4,473 —4,473 research report in this Review. 1983/84 53,657 48,610 —5,047 —7,961 In the United States, however, steps are 1984/85 (e) 57,357 57,203 —154 —6,745 being taken in some newspapers and television 1985/86 (e) 62,056 62,500 +444 —6,500 networks to allay audience and reader concerns: • some staff journalists are being given the task Budgetary restraint is not a one-off effort of acting as ombudsmen — investigating but a continuing task for governments. Every readers complaints and publishing an one per cent growth adds some $650 million that assessment, which strives to be objective, in has to be raised from the public. Given the the newspaper; inability of governments to contemplate • readers have been invited to say how they reducing spending this additional $650 million would have handled a particular editorial has to be raised not only in year 1 but in every decision, with their views then being publicly succeeding year. compared with the editors decision; Having to date recorded a real increase in • greater efforts are being made to explain why government expenditure of 14 per cent (total of the paper acted as it did, for example why a

LE IPA COMMENTARY

particularly gruesome picture had been only Australian journalist to give coverage to published on the front page; Robert Mannes detailed critical analysis of the • PBS television network has introduced a presss treatment of the Combe-Ivanov affair - programme, "Inside Story", devoted to media Quadrant, October, 1984). criticism. In June, it put to air "Televisions During the period of the last federal Vietnam: the Real Story", produced by election The Age ran a regular analysis of the Accuracy in the Media and highly critical of media and a tribunal was temporarily set up to the networks own series on the Vietnam War. ensure balanced coverage at the ABC. It would Apart from one or two exceptions, such as be a move in the right direction towards David Solomons column in the Financial ensuring free and reponsibte media . if Review, it is hard to find parallel attempts at self- initiatives of this type became permanent scrutiny in Australias media. (Solomon was the features of media organisations in Australia.

SOCIALISM IN AUSTRALIA

A new booklet published by Australians for Commonsense, Freedom and Responsibility (ACFR) as part of a community education project on public issues. "The bureaucrat who lobbies for a new program for a purported socially desirable end which he may believe in, also knows that his power will increase and prospects of promotion improve by the creation of a new unit with more bureaucrats... The pressure groups advocating regulatory government action know that it legislation is enacted as a consequence of lobbying, they may be appointed to implement the act. Some advocates of the Sex Discrimination Act, 1983 (Commonwealth) expect to find themselves lucrative posts as advisers or bureaucrats when the Act is being implemented." "...the very systems of checks and balances to authority that are seen by those proposing radical constitutional change as impeding human progress are the same mechanisms that liberal reformers painstakingly constructed in days gone by to safeguard the liberty of the individual from the tyranny of despots, or from the tyranny of transient majorities". Socialism in Australia costs $5. To order it or enquire about other booklets in the series write to ACFR, P.O. Box 414 Epping, NSW, 2121. Government Expenditure Can be Cut

John Stone

The most useful outcome of that doubtful including its capacity to take unpalatable exercise — the so-called Tax Summit — has been decisions, since the election. Secondly, certain the strongly widening community understanding particular budgetary developments, such as the and acceptance that government expenditures defeat in Caucus of the Minister for Finance on must be cut. his proposals for savings in the area of tertiary It is vital to reduce the burden of personal education expenditure, have not augured well. income tax, and it may be necessary to do so by Such developments have led some to the "switching" some of that burden to a new despairing view that cutting government broadly-based indirect tax. But more and more expenditure is just "too hard". Nevertheless, people are now realising that the real culprit is government expenditure can be cut; it is a the total burden of taxation — that is, the total question of whether governments are put under level of spending by our governments, Federal, sufficient electoral pressure to do so. Which is State and Local. why, as I say, the "tax summit" charade may Note also that, high though that total nevertheless prove to have one useful outcome in burden of taxation is, it would be higher still if helping to generate that pressure. part of the total spending bill were not being met More recently, the pressure which the by borrowings by those governments. Government has come under because of what Those borrowings are themselves creating has seemed at times to have been the "free fall" growing problems for those governments and of the Australian dollar, has served to will do so exponentially the longer they continue. concentrate wonderfully Ministerial minds in Thus, unless spending can really be cut, taxes Canberra, including that of the Prime Minister (however raised) will have to increase further. in particular. So we need to deal with the real culprit, the State Governments, as much as Federal, total level of spending. have pursued the extravagant spending policies The expenditure element of the Prime which have characterised Australian fiscal Ministers "trilogy" of promises during the 1984 performance over the past fifteeen years or so. election campaign commits the Commonwealth Appropriately, therefore, the Commonwealth Government to "restrain" the growth in its own Government has now begun to cut at the roots of budgetary outlays to not greater than the rate of State Government spending powers by sharply growth of nominal Gross Domestic Product reducing the rate of increase in its financial (GDP). That is, outlays as a proportion of GDP transfers to State budgets. will not increase further. One such step has been directed to reining in Since that proportion is scheduled to rise the growth of Commonwealth funding of roads. this financial year to a record 31.1 per cent, that New arrangements now proposed to replace the might, in any case, not be regarded as a striking Road Grants Act will produce payments to the achievement. States (and Northern Territory) in 1985-86 Even so, the Governments prospects of which, in conjunction with the amount to be achieving even that limited objective have not paid under the Australian Bicentennial Road until recently looked good. First, there has been Development programme, will total only $3 the general disintegration of the Government, million more than the total of $1,242 million CUTTING GOVERNMENT being paid under these programmes in this used as its "reference base" for purposes of the financial year Treasurers expenditure restraint statement on 14 Roads payments of this money magnitude May. would represent a significant reduction in real Nevertheless, such an outcome (together terms, particularly having in mind that the with what appears to be even greater inflation of road-building costs will now, in the proportionate savings in the comparable grants aftermath of the recent depreciation of the to the Northern Territory) represents a currency, be a good deal greater than previously worthwhile step towards the Governments envisaged. As such, these decisions will certainly objective. assist in reaching the Commonwealths Such an outcome will also place most State budgetary objective. Governments under pressure to re-examine their Much more significant, however, are the proclivities to spend our money so freely. That tax-sharing grants arrangements, which expire will be wholly to the good. on 30 June this year. These provide for 20.72 per The Government has already decided to cent of the Commonwealths total tax revenues make some savings this year in its grants to local (excluding the proceeds of the Medicare levy, the authorities. Under present arrangements, ABRD excise surcharge and some more minor payments are made each year to State levies) in a given year to be provided to the States Governments, for distribution to their local in the following year. If those arrangements were authorities, amounting to 2 per cent of the net to persist into 1985-86, the States would receive receipts from personal income tax (excluding the something like a 15.5 per cent increase in their Medicare levy) in the previous year. If these tax-sharing grants This component of the arrangements had continued such payments Budget, which this year is estimated to account would have risen in 1985-86 by around 19.9 per for 14.2 per cent of total Commonwealth cent. outlays, would therefore be growing These payments were a regrettable considerably faster than GDP in 1985-86 (which, "initiative" of the Fraser Government. The for these purposes, we might put at around 10-11 present Government has now decided to end per cent in nominal terms). Clearly, that could them, by providing an increase of "only" 2 per not be allowed if the Government was to meet its cent in real terms in 1985-86 (saving $62 million) (limited) expenditure objective. while it considers more permanent There are any number of alternative arrangements. "formulae" which the Commonwealth might As to what these permanent arrangements have sought to impose upon the States in this should be, doubtless future payments to the area. States will need to be supplemented to allow What they have in fact done, for 1985-86 at them to go on assisting their local authorities in least, is to agree to raise these general revenue some degree. If, for example, the sums to be paid grants (including the identified health grants) by in respect of local authorities in 1985-86 were to an amount which, on present estimate, would be added to the new general revenue grants to be work out at something like 7.5 per cent, or paid to the States and subjected to the same roughly 0.5 per cent in real terms. "formula" as for those grants, there would be The saving involved, in the case of the tax- further savings in future years compared with sharing grants compared with the outcome the present arrangements. Appreciably more under the present arrangements, would be in the austere - provisions could be made — and order of $725 million. It should however be justified. noted that such an outcome would in fact There is another saving to be had in this represent an increase of some $680 million on area. These payments to the States for their local the figure for the tax-sharing grants which has authorities are made each year in a single lump been included in the forward estimates sum as soon as the necessary administrative documents released by the Minister of Finance arrangements have been made, usually in on 9 May last, and which the Government then September/October. As a result, a large lump of

The ABRD is financed from the proceeds of a 2 cent/litre excise surcharge on motor spirit and distillate, which in 1984-85 was estimated to raise $410 million. After allowance for the effect in 1984-85 of a real terms guarantee provisions, which would be inoperative in 1985-86. CUTTING GOVERNMENT

Commonwealth funds flows into the money involved, rather than only two-thirds of that market at that time each year. cost. Payments by monthly instalments from In the foregoing I have touched on only a (say) October onwards each year would reduce few of the expenditure programmes in the area significantly the interest cost to the of Commonwealth payments to the States Commonwealth and would also improve the (including the Northern Territory) and local present maldistribution of the seasonal pattern authorities, as candidates for the expenditure of Commonwealth transactions in the money "restraint" the Government needs if it is to markets. An additional advantage of rolling achieve even its limited expenditure objective. these payments into the successor to the tax- Commonwealth Governments are usually sharing grants (paid monthly at the Treasurers more ready to impose spending constraints upon discretion) would thus be an automatic the State Governments than they are upon their improvement both in the timing of such own spending agencies. In the 1984-85 Budget, payments and in their financing costs to the for example, spending by the Commonwealth Commonwealth. Government itself was estimated to rise by 15.1 Clearly, if the Government was going to per cent, while payments to the States, Northern achieve even its limited objectives in restraining Territory and local authorities were estimated to its spending, it simply had to make significant rise by 8.9 per cent. ground in the ways I have noted. However, even The Government has already, in its making that ground would have been largely statement of 14 May last, extended some pointless if the States and their authorities could restraints to the spending of its main agencies in then proceed to step up their borrowings so as to 1985-86. Nevertheless, in the Budget itself that keep spending as before. process will undoubtedly have to go further. In short, a cut in the CommonweaIths share There is, after all, no lack of candidates; of the total Public Sector Borrowing space alone precludes their enumeration, and Requirement (PSBR), through a reduction in its elaboration of the points involved. One has only own deficit, would be to no avail if offset by an to consider, however, such items as the increase in the borrowings of State authorities. Australian Broadcasting Corporation ($396 Decisions now taken in this area at the recent million), the foreign aid programme ($973 Loan Council meeting are, therefore, highly million), the First Home Owners Scheme ($265 relevant. million), and a hundred others, to begin to see One such decision at that meeting involved the opportunities which would exist for a the level in 1985-86 of the so-called government really determined to save our money "governmental" borrowing programme, the rather than hell-bent to spend it for us (and tax State component of which amounts this year to us accordingly). $1,564.5 million. At present one-third of this In its May statement the Government has programme is in fact provided to the States in the indeed already scratched the surface of each of form of grants. At the very least, one would the three specific items mentioned above; more, expect to see no increase in money terms in the clearly, could be done in each case, and in the size of this programme in 1985-86, and that is many other cases not separately enumerated. what has now been agreed. Beyond that, does The challenge which the Expenditure any rationale now exist, any longer, for the Review Committee of Cabinet — and the interest-free grant component? Government more generally — has been Termination of the latter (which did not confronting in recent weeks — and which will emerge from the recent Loan Council meeting) continue to confront them in the run-up to the would produce savings to the Commonwealth Budget proper is not, therefore, that there is any Budget in 1985-86; the savings would be lack of appropriate candidates for spending considerably greater in 1986-87 and would restraint. The challenge is rather to the will of thereafter mount progressively. Equally senior Ministers in prosecuting that task. At this importantly, State Governments would also then stage we can only wish them well in doing so. As be faced in this area with paying something to the final outcome, we shall see. nearer (at Ieast) to the true cost of the capital

10 Limiting Government Spending Peter Samuel

In the U.S., electors in many States have decided that constitutional limitations on government taxing, spending and borrowing are the only ways to control the profligate habits of politicians.

The philsopher David Hume wrote that it is always inflation. `very tempting to a (government) minister to At other times in American history, State, city employ such an expedient, as enables him to make and local governments have been on the brink of a great figure during his Administration, without bankruptcy — most notably in recent times, New overburdening the people with taxes, or exciting York City in 1975 (see Ken Aulettas The Streets any immediate clamors against himself. were Paved with Gold, Random House, New York, Government expenditure without matching tax 1979). revenues is one of the ultimate temptations of Progressively-rated income taxes, combined governments, and Hume concluded: `The practice with double digit inflation, engineered `bracket therefore of contracting debt will almost infallibly creep and brought vast increases in revenues to be abused by every government. American governments during the 1970s. But they The people of most States of the US have also spawned the `tax revolt — vocal popular used their powers of initiative by petition and protest, active political organising and quiet referendum to amend their constitutions so as to personal efforts at evasion and avoidance of outlaw unbalanced budgets and deficit financing. taxation: Theres a similar drive at the Federal level with an On June 6, 1978 the voters of California by amendment likely to the US Constitution to limit 65 per cent to 35 per cent approved Proposition spending and mandate a balanced budget. 13, which amended the State constitution to cut The struggle to contain taxation and deficit property taxes (rates in Australian terminology) spending in America is an old one. The first revolt in half. National and international attention was by Amercians was the cry `No taxation without focussed on the American `tax revolt, and its hero representation. Then George Washingtons army the curmudgeonly old Howard Jervis, a veteran that fought the British and eventually established campaigner against taxes. Americas independence by force of arms was Anti-tax campaigning goes back many years. heavily demoralised and nearly fell apart in the Howard Jervis suffered many defeats and much midst of the Revolutionary War because of the derision as a crank before he won in 1978. New worthlessness of the currency in which they were Jersey, whose businesses and workers have always being paid. The American Revolution was nearly played second fiddle to adjacent New York and aborted by deficit spending! `Not worth a Philadelphia, proved the first State to be Continental became a common phrase of the responsive to the potential economic benefit of contempt for the first American currency as breaking with the big spending policies of its mismanaged by the Continental Congress in the neighbours and in 1976 the annual budget was by 1770s. law tied to per capita income to try to limit But for draconian last-minute monetary spending. Colorado in 1977 legislated to limit its reforms, the American Revolution might have been budget increase to seven per cent yearly. The first undermined by government profligacy and constitutional limit on spending growth was in LIMITING GOVERNMENT SPENDING

Tennessee in March 1978 when the voters changed over-generous social security system for an ageing the State constitution to limit the growth of State population, so the Reagan budgets made a government spending to the rate of growth of the mockery of the promise to get into `balance. The States economy, so freezing the State governments $50 billion budget deficit nearly quadrupled in the share. first Reagan term, 1981-84. It remains an accomplishment of the Reagan first term that the rate of growth of government Opinion polls show the `Balanced Budget spending was cut and after an unscheduled Constitutional Amendment is favoured recession, the US economy showed more healthy - by about three quarters of Americans. growth than for two decades with strong capital formation, new business formation, and six Arizona, Hawaii, Idaho, Michigan, Nevada million new jobs. Mr. Reagans opponents were and Texas all had constitutional amendments in reduced to criticising him for the deficit and his 1978 to limit spending and taxes. In 1979 challenger for the presidency, Walter Mondale, felt California followed up Jervis Proposition 13 with forced to promise a tax increase. Reagan promised a comprehensive spending limits amendment to only to raise taxes as an absolute last resort. Re- the Constitution, voting by a masssive 74 per cent elected in a massive landslide (59 per cent of the to 26 per cent for Proposition 4. It limited the popular vote to Mondales 41 per cent), Reagan expenditures of all branches of government within got an all-time record of electoral college delegates, the State to the inflation rate and population 525 to 13 on November 6, 1984. In his second term growth, intending to freeze per capita real he is pledged to tax simplification, the balanced spending. A referendum could adjust the spending budget amendment and further efforts to reduce limits, up or down, if a simple majority of the government, though it is unclear how much he will electorate voted for it. achieve. In 1979, Louisiana, Nevada, Oregon, Utah It is paradoxical that just as America has and Washington followed. Increasingly State elected a President personally antagonistic to big legislators followed the popular mood, or government, so much of the fire has gone out of anticipated it. Sometimes to forestall moves for the tax revolt. In the first four years of the 1980s constitutional amendment they enacted tax- only two more States have passed bills for a limiting laws. Tax reductions were initiated by constitutional amendment for a balanced US responsive or panicky politicians. (This period is budget, still two short of the number needed. But well described in AIvin Rabushka and Pauline the recent elections saw Republican landslides in Ryans, The Tax Revolt, Hoover Press, Stanford, two critical hold-out States, Michigan and 1982). Montana. So there is an opportunity for movement for the conservative forces. Amending the US Constitution During Reagans first term such a constitutional amendment bill passed both houses It was also in the late 1970s that one State of the US Congress, but in the Democrat legislature after another passed bills calling for a controlled House of Representatives without the national convention to amend the US Constitution necessary two-thirds majority. Two Washington to mandate a balanced budget and limit federal lobby groups, the National Taxpayers Union and government spending. By the end of the 1970s the National Tax Limitation Committee are some thirty States had called for such a working strongly for the constitutional convention, though two-thirds, or thirty-four, amendment, which opinion polls show is favoured States are needed. by about three-quarters of Americans. 1980 saw the defeat of President Carter by Ronald Reagan who pledged to cut income taxes Spending Bias by a quarter and to balance the federal budget. It was a sweeping popular vote victory — 51 per An excellent statement of the case for such cent to 40 per cent (an Independent Republican, a constitutional clause, and indeed of the whole Anderson, got 8 per cent). The tax reduction history of such moves, is the report of the pledge was honored, and so were pledges to Judiciary Committee of the US Senate titled, increase defence spending and retain Americas Balanced Budget-Tax Limitation Constitutional

12 SUBSCRIBE TODAY Guarantee your copy of the REVIEW FACTS every quarter plus IPA Policy Issues and Occasional Papers ------ ------q Please enrol me as an IPA Subscriber

NAME (BLOCK LETTERS)

ADDRESS

POSTCODE Enter a 1 year gift Subscription

RECIPIENTS NAME (BLOCK LETTERS)

ADDRESS

POSTCODE

GIFT CARD TO READ FROM...

PAYMENT OPTIONS q I enclose my cheque for $...... made payable to the Institute of Public Affairs q Please charge my bankcard Expiry Date ......

Cardholders 9 I m Signature

The IPA Review: Australias leading journal of free enterprise opinion

AFFIX STAMP HERE

The Administrator, Institute of Public Affairs, 3rd Floor, 83 William Street, Melbourne, 3000. LIMITING GOVERNMENT SPENDING

Amendment (Report 98-628, Calendar no.1214, says they have had a `constraining effect on the September 20, 1984). It states (p3): `The proposed proclivity of public sector spending (Uhimchuk, amendment addresses a serious spending bias in Constitutional Limits at the State Level). A recent the present fiscal process ... Members of Congress survey by Peter A. Holmes (`Flush Times at are free to respond to the concentrated pressures Statehouse, in July 1984 issue of Nations Business of spending interest groups — and reap the journal) shows both the potential and the limits political advantages of doing so — without having of these constitutional and legal restraints. to reap concomitant political disadvantages by In the 1982 recession when State tax revenues reducing spending programmes favoured by some were under extremely heavy pressure because of other spending interests or expressly raising taxes. the economic downturn, many States found ways The result is that spending continues inexorably around their restraints. Some avoided tax restraints to rise whatever the genuine will of the people. The by raising user fees or won court battles to validate result is an essentially undemocratic and some tax increases despite the restrictions. A few unresponsive process that enables members of made use of their two-year budget cycle to run a Congress to avoid ultimate accountability for their deficit one year and have been lucky that the spending and taxing decisions. It is the existence vigorous 1984 recovery has got them big surpluses of this institutional bias that convinces this this year. committee (of the US Senate) that a constitutional solution is now required ..: Big Spending Coalitions Note this is politicians talking! The proposed constitutional amendment Also in the 1980s the high spending coalition would require a balanced budget to be adopted of big government, big business and government unless otherwise voted by a three-fifths majority employee unions has counter-attacked against the of both houses of the •Congress. Tax receipts tax-revolt forces. The tax-and-spend coalitions budgeted must not increase at a greater rate than have been winning lots of the battles in the 1980s national income in the preceding year unless both against further constitutional amendments and houses explicitly vote for the excess tax increase. restrictions. In the elections in November last year In time of declared war the provisions are waived. a series of voter initiatives for new State The American States have some experience constitutional amendments were defeated, as in with similar budgetary restraints. Thirty-nine 1982. This year in California, Jervis lost 55/45 in States have constitutions demanding balanced an attempt to close loopholes in Propositions 13 budgets and eight have laws requiring them, and 4. Jervis proposition to the voters was leaving only three without such restraint. Most US considered too radical by many middle-ground States require bond issues or borrowing to be voters in that it provided for large refunds of past positively approved by voters in a ballot, acting property taxes, and many said that Jervis style as a limit on governments and some of their in TV ads was overbearing. Narrowly defeated this instrumentalities. year was an electors attempt to overturn a sales tax in Idaho and an attempt to limit property taxes by constitutional amendment in Oregon. The high spending coalition of big Defeated by large margins were a tax rollback government, big business and government in Michigan, a two-thirds vote requirement on employee unions has counter-attacked. increased taxes and spending in Nevada and a Louisiana move to constitutionally limit taxes and spending. There were also successes for the By 1982, eight States (Arizona, California, opponents of big government. Virginia and New Delaware, Hawaii, Michigan, Missouri, Tennessee, Hampshire adopted balanced budget clauses to Texas) had adopted constitutional limits on their constitutions and in South Carolina a spending as well as having the balanced budget package of spending limits (with State provision. Another twelve States have statutory congressional support) was passed. limits on spending. Most provide for emergency Alvin Rabushka (The Tax Revolt) is `over-ride with three-fifths or two-thirds of votes pessimistic about the lasting power of tax revolts, in both legislatures, or by voter approval. The most suggesting they are likely only to have short-term comprehensive study of the effect of such limits victories and only against the most egregious tax

13 LIMITING GOVERNMENT SPENDING increases: `It is almost impossible for any of employees for several years now, and many go organisation representing an ad hoc group of for long stretches not fully replacing workers who taxpayers, with only one common goal, to sustain leave, so running down their numbers. There is interest, loyalty and participation in longer term active interest in contracting-out and privatisation goals ... in contrast with individual taxpayers, the of services. proponents of taxing and spending, are a far more Unlike the Federal government, the States are unified and enduring group whose view of the running up considerable surpluses in their budgets, future is usually tied to the next annual budget which according to some estimates will reach some or election. This group enjoys access to an army $60 billion to $70 billion this financial year. This of tax-supported statisticians and researchers who will lead to major retirement of State debts. can be marshalled to back up announcements of impending cuts in services if tax cuts are enacted Low Tax Competition ... if expediency demands an acquiescence to a tax cut, the coalition may temporarily accommodate; One marked advantage the US has over however once a crisis is over, it quickly resumes Australia is the potential in a country of its natural inclination to tax and spend ... (p. 202) geographically small states for competition in low Rabushka, despite his pessimism about the taxes. Many good-sized US cities spread across political viability of tax revolt activists, says the State boundaries and it is possible for one State record bears out the public benefits of tax cuts. to attract business and population through a Jobs and economic activity burgeon after such reputation for lower taxes. Thus northern New limits on State government. California and Jersey and • western Connecticut have attracted Massachusetts have seen massive business business out of New York City and in the process investment and unprecedented prosperity in the acted to limit New Yorks big-government excesses. wake of the late 1970s tax revolts and the changed Southern New Jersey and Delaware are relatively climate about taxing and spending in those states. low-tax, small government areas on the fringe of Holmes (Nations Business, July 1984) is Philadelphia which is in the state of Pennsylvania. somewhat more optimistic about long-term results, New Hampshire is the supply-side competitor for saying that even though the anti-tax/spending business from Boston, Massachusetts, which in the activists have been defeated in the constitutional 60s and 70s anyway got the nickname Taxachusetts tussles, they have created an atmosphere in which — before a tax revolt caught on there. Relatively State government has been more restrained: `The free enterprise Delaware and Virginia act as a tax rebellion has had a chilling effect on restraint on the welfarist-Democrat politicians of legislatures largesse. Holmes cites a lot of Maryland and the District of Columbia. The West statistics to bolster his case that the tax revolt Virginian government spenders are sometimes people have only been defeated through the limited by tax rates in bordering Ohio with their spenders making major concessions and exercising major cities being located along the Ohio River more self-restraint. In the two decades prior to that forms the border. Between the relatively big- 1978, at the height of the tax revolt, real spending and left-liberal States of the Pacific coast government spending by US State governments and the conservative business-minded Rocky rose an average 4.4 per cent a year. Inflation- Mountains states of Colorado and Nevada, there adjusted growth since 1978 has been less than one has also been some tax/jobs competition, which per cent. Most states have had freezes on numbers is sometimes a restraint on big State government.

14 The Two-Airline Policy and lessons from South Australia

Professor David Starkie

The success of airline deregulation in the United States in producing better services for customers is now clear. In Australia, however, the Two Airline Policy survives. The 1979 decision to allow some regional air services has now provided relevant Australian experience on the likely effects of dereguation. The results are positive.

The Two-Airline Policy survives in Australia regulated airline system — although dissatisfied because of government fears that its abolition with the existing arrangements — and that the will lead to monopoly and reduced services. issue is not whether to deregulate but what is the Australian experience with some regional most appropriate level of regulation. He had put services does not support these fears. forward two arguments in support of his In essence, the Two Airline Policy is an position. First, deregulation in the United States agreement ratified by legislation, between the is not instructive for Australia because of major Federal Government, Ansett and the differences in the scale of the airline industry in government-owned TAA. It limits competition the two countries (speech at the National on all major routes to those two airlines. The Aviation Press Club Luncheon, 26.3.84; reported Policy was instituted originally in the 1950s to in The Financial Review 27.3.84). Second, he provide a stable environment in a national foresaw deregulation leading to cut-throat market presumed to be too thin to sustain a competition, in turn leading to eventual competitive balance. monopoly on the Melbourne-Sydney-Brisbane The latest airline agreement enacted in 1981 route and fare increases and/or reduced services requires, like previous agreements, that the on the less profitable trunk routes with remote capacity offered on competing trunk routes by centres sharing a similar experience (National the two airlines, be equal. The Government Times, 9.9.83 and speech to Aviation Law retains control over potential competition on Society, October 1983). these interstate routes by controlling the import of aircraft (and therefore capacity) using its Deregulation Exists trade powers under S.51(1). Base fares are set by a formula determined by the Independent Air There is, however, an instructive case of how Fares Committee, but the 1981 agreement does airlines operate in a deregulated environment allow for greater fare competition with respect to within Australia which thus far has not received special fares. the attention it perhaps deserves. South Australia (and Victoria) are in the peculiar Government Fears position of having no state controls on aviation. This was of little consequence prior to 1979. The new Minister for Aviation, Peter Until then the Commonwealth Government Morris, has yet to -announce his views on the controlled the situation using powers under the subject of the Two-Airline Policy. However, the Air Navigation Act of 1920. But, in 1979, the previous Minister for Aviation, the Hon. Kim Commonwealth decided to adopt a more hands- Beazley, signalled that he was a supporter of a off approach to regional air transport,

15 TWO-AIRLINE POLICY maintaining an interventionist role only with suggests that because thin routes were open to respect to air safety matters. The Independent entry, monopolists acted as though they were Air Fares Committee, which since late 1981, has operating in a competitive market. had powers to approve intra-state air fares also ASA has announced that it is to introduce new appears to have adopted a benign approach. The F50s in 1987. Competition has not precluded result is that South Australia has had for nearly re-equipment with new technology, but it is five years what amounts to an `open skies most likely that it has forced ASA to become policy. a leaner and more efficent business. The consequences have been monitored by myself and the Senior Economist in the South Theory Provides Explanation Australian Department of Transport. The situation is as follows: Recent developments in industrial • Up to 1982 there was a significant growth in organisation economics — referred to as services. This growth was consolidated during contestability theory — have re-emphasised the the recession when there was some trimming idea that the structure of an industry — the and some turnover of operators. But, from the number of competing firms -- may have little consumers point of view, the substantial bearing on the efficiency of an industry and service improvements of the earlier period therefore the extent to which consumers benefit. have in general been maintained. The new approach has stood the test of the recession The competitive pressures required for an well. efficient solution can come equally well • The total number of scheduled flights into and from potential rather than actual out of Adelaide has increased by nearly 20 per competition. cent to a figure in excess of 500 per week. Much of the increase in weekly flights relates to new routes and new ports-of-call rather The theory revolves around the idea that the than to competition on a particular route. competitive pressures required for an efficient Where competition on a route has increased, solution can come equally well from potential the tendency has been to fill gaps in the rather than actual competition. The key is the timetable. capacity of firms to contest a market (rather • Service levels between the Southern Eyre than actual competition within it). This ability to Peninsula (Port Lincoln/Cummings) and contest, depends upon the ease with which a Adelaide have been examined in detail. Until firm could enter and exit from a market without late 1970 the protected monopolist, Airlines of cost. This, in turn, depends upon whether South Australia (ASA), was the only operator capital is mobile or irretrievably committed to a with 40 weekly flights. By February, 1985, particular servicer. Aircraft of course are there were 126 weekly flights, 46 by ASAs F27 particularly mobile between markets and serve or aircraft chartered by ASA. A range of this theory well. Consequently, it is feasible to promotional fares is now offered in contrast to have a route which is a natural monopoly (i.e., only the standard economy fare in 1979. where production by an efficient single firm is • About half of the routes were single firm cheapest given the size of the market), but, (monopoly) routes, some new and some long because the natural monopolist is threatened by established. There is little evidence in either the posssibility of fly-in and fly-out competition, case of the established single operator in these he is not able to expolit his monopoly power. In `thin markets experiencing hit-and-run entry. other words, if the monopolist is to maintain his Competition in the market has focussed on position as sole producer he must not behave the denser routes operated by ASA. other than in a manner one would expect to find • A comparative analysis of fares on single and in a competitive market; he must keep his multi-firm routes indicated no significant operations efficient and his prices down difference on a cents-per-kilometre basis. This sufficiently to deter entry.

Extensive detail of developments up to mid-1983 will be found in C Findlay, Changes in the Air? Centre for Independent Studies, 1984.

16 TWO-AIRLINE POLICY

The theory also points to a limitation in this tail) scheduling. But the potential advantages of argument. In certain circumstances where costs the split schedule have been nullified by a are rising it is possible that the natural general reduction of frequencies during the monopolist whilst behaving in an efficient 1982-84 recession. manner, is not able to deter competitive entry; or Weak market conditions did not deter East- as the jargon has it, he is unable to "sustain" his West Airlines from launching a major challenge services against entry. Bearing in mind that, by to the Two -Airline Policy in 1983. East-West definition, a natural monopolist is the lowest launched a no-frills service between Brisbane- cost means of fulfilling market demand, an Sydney-Melbourne and Melbourne-Adelaide unsustainable natural monopoly will result effectively in competition with the two majors either in higher production costs (if market but with an intermediate stop. East-West also demand is satisfied by more than one firm) or entered a legal challenge to the constitutional consumers will be worse off because output is validity of the Two-Airline Policy. The restricted (to a level at which costs are not rising subsequent sale of East-West to Skywest of thus making it impossible to under-price the Western Australia resulted in the withdrawal of monopolist). Here lies the case for airline the challenge. The profile of the new company regulation. But the proponents need to show not appears innovative but less aggressive. that deregulation of the domestic trunk routes may lead to monopoly, but that such a Application monopoly is either not contestable, or if contestable (and therefore efficiently serving the We can speculate on the applicability of our customer), is not sustainable against entry i.e., is South Australian findings in a broader unstable. Australian context. The varied character of the The regulators have yet to argue their case South Australian market — the stage lengths on these lines but they have positioned involved, range of aircraft used and the size and themselves to reject the U.S. evidence. This is nature of the sub-markets — suggests that it unreasonable. The U.S. market, although much provides a strong case that conditions of larger in total, does contain within it a variety of minimal regulation would probably translate sub-markets, some of which are `thin and some well to the other States with current restrictions of which resemble the Australian circumstances on entry. which so worried the previous Minister. The U.S. The implications of the findings for the experience deserves further study. domestic trunk network are less obvious, given Since the last agreement was ratified there the different scale and type of operation. have been developments of significance. The two Nevertheless, I am encouraged to be optimistic. major airlines have re-equipped with dissimilar It is by no means self-evident that services on the equipment — TAA with the A300 Airbus and less important trunk routes will deteriorate, nor Ansett with Boeing 767s. Because each airline is is it self-evident that the basic route structure will required to offer the same total of seat- be monopolistic. But if monopoly was to occur, kilometres on competitive routes in each half recent developments in South Australia suggest year, TAA with the larger aircraft has had to that, in practice as well as in theory, thin offer a lower frequency, on average. markets, monopoly, competitive fares and Consequently, seasoned interstate travellers will efficient levels of service that benefit the have noticed a reduction in parallel (or nose-to- consumer are not necessarily incompatible.

See, for example, Michael Kirby, The U.S. Airline Deregulation Experience and its Implications for Australia; in Changes in the Air? The Centre for Independent Studies, N.S. W., 1984, and Peter Samuel, Airline Deregulation: The Pleasure and the Pain, IPA Review, Summer 1984.

17 Department of Unemployment

Dr. Gerard Henderson

Despite its title the actions of the Department of Employment and Industrial Relations often serve to create unemployment. Dr. Gerard Henderson explains why.

When I worked in the Department of increase. Not surprisingly there was a massive Employment and Industrial Relations (DEIR) its and sudden increase in unemployment. twin functions were clearly delineated. In order to save jobs, many four-day In Employment the aim was to push people working week agreements were reached between into work — preferably on the public payroll employers and employees. In these circumstances (particularly through the Commonwealth the employer agreed not to retrench. In return Employment Programme). the employees agreed only to work, and be paid In Industrial Relations, on the other hand, for, a four day week. we were busy lengthening the dole queues. This One would have thought that this was was done by securing the enforcement of our unexceptionable. After all, bosses and workers rigid centralised federal award system that is so were voluntarily co-operating to save jobs. beloved by the Industrial Relations Club. The But no. Not all these work-sharing various State Departments fulfill a similar role agreements had been ratified by the Arbitration concerning State awards. Commission. Consequently, awards had been In the midst of the 1982 recession there were breached. Horror. massive lay-offs in Australian industry. For a brief time I formed the view that the To some extent this resulted from the lunatics had taken over the asylum. But international recession. But many workers were gradually I realised that this was what our priced out of jobs by our home-made wages cherished sacred cow — the centralised wages explosion. system --- was all about. In December 1981 the Conciliation and The Australian arbitration system has had Arbitration Commission ratified the Metal the effect of making full employment illegal Industry Agreement which provided for a 25 per Yet the members of the IR Club engage in cent increase in hourly labour costs. bouts of mutual self-congratulation about their The President, Sir John Moore, declared essential realism and moderation. that the Commission regarded the agreement as During my time in the Industrial Relations being in the "public interest". The learned Bureau and in the Department of Employment President used a double negative — but his and Industrial Relations between 1980 and 1983, meaning was clear nevertheless. 1 encountered numerous examples of centralised The Metal Industry Agreement flowed wage system madness. In all cases the officials through the wages system as a centralised wages enforcing the economic insanity laid down in the flow-on. Virtually all employers — whether they awards were working under clear ministerial were making profits or on the verge of direction and putting into practice the collective bankruptcy — were compelled to pay the wisdom of the IR Club. Moreover they were Professor Michael Porter, `Legalise Full Employment; IPA Review, Spring 1984.

18 DEPARTMENT OF UNEMPLOYMENT paying due respect to the determinations of that Case Study No.3 - gigantic Geneva hoax- the International Labour Making More Youth Unemployment Possible Organisation. In a medium sized city there is a fast food Case Study No.1 - outlet which employs two cooks and one junior Making Latch Keys Necessary trainee. The junior complained that, really, he In an inner Sydney suburb the employees wasnt getting much money for his labours. The (mainly migrant women) petitioned the Department of Industrial Relations took over. management to alter their working hours. By An inspection was ordered. It revealed that the starting thirty minutes earlier and having only a appropriate rate was being paid. half hour for lunch they could be home when • But (wait for it) the inspector found that the their children returned from school. The award determined that the ratio between senior management agreed. and junior cooks should be three to one. In this Enter the award inspector on a routine visit. case the ratio requirement was not being met. He declared that the award, as laid down by the The. same situation applied to virtually every IR gnomes in Melbourne, had been breached other restaurant in the city. since standard hours were not being worked. Therefore there had been an award breach. The employer was warned that should the It could only be rectified if the employer put the award be violated again he would have to pay junior on the full adult wage. Any juniors each employee an hours overtime per day. He employed over the previous six years were also would be so liable to every employee who had entitled to receive the adult rate for their past worked in the factory over the past six years. labours. Not surprisingly the employer got the hint The employer declared that, if this were the and returned to standard hours. As a result the case, he would not employ any more juniors. children of the workers spend an extra hour Over to the Employment section of the every day without parental care. DEIR to put the case for more government subsidies to encourage employers to take on Case Study No.2 - juniors. Over to the Taxation Office to raise the Adding to the Dole Queues necessary finance. Over to the Australian taxpayer to cough up the money. A butcher in a small provincial town During my period in the Department such employed six workers. For twenty years the cases were discussed by tenured public servants butcher had paid his employees according to the who were quite unaware of the harsh realities of State award. The relevant State department had the market-place. I was invariably told that it was continously informed the employer of his more important that principles by upheld than obligations under this award. No contrary advice that jobs be saved. They were out to stop had been received from any Commonwealth "exploitation" - irrespective of the consequences. Department or from the Arbitration The Hancock Committee (which was Commission. established in July 1983 to enquire into An inspector paid a routine visit to the Australias industrial relations laws and system) premises of one employer in the industry. He did not devote its attention to overcoming the decided that the butcher was bound by a Federal, insanity produced by a rigid, inflexible not State, award. Since the Federal award centralised wage system. Rather it has provided for a higher hourly rate, back payments recommended that the power of the IR Club had to be made — to the tune of $10,000. The (industrial tribunals, unions and employer employer said he couldnt pay without sacking organisations) be further enhanced. one employee. The inspector declared that the This is precisely the wrong remedy for arbitration law was the arbitration law. Australias economic and industrial relations ills. In the end one individual was added to the Quite predictably, the Hancock Report has dole queues. But the centralised system had been proved to be an expensive and harmful upheld. bureaucratic waste of time.

19 Unleashing the Unions Tying up Management

Peter Costello

The Hawke Government has moved to deregulate two major areas of activity — the financial system and trade unions. The first should be applauded, the second is unlikely to gain the support of most Australians. The Government has removed restraints imposed on unions under current industrial laws. At the same time, there has been an increase in the regulation of management. The overall effect of these developments is to concentrate more power in the small, powerful and highly organised group which controls Australias trade unions.

A trade union registered under the time officials face an election at least every four (Commonwealth) Conciliation and Arbitration years. The amendments allow a union official who (CA) Act obtains valuable privileges such as a is to retire within 12 months after his four-year legal personality, the right to appear before the term has elapsed to continue in office until Commission, be a party to an Award and the retirement. Why (Laurie Carmichael not excepted) protection of its membership from "poaching" by should there be any need to provide an additional other unions. years sinecure free from election for officials who In return, unions have been required to adopt are supposed to be accountable to their members? certain standards in their organisational rules and, Nevertheless, this "reform" was pushed through more recently, to have their financial statements with little interest outside the rarefied atmosphere audited. of the industrial relations world. Unions, like employers, were previously liable Immediately after its election the first Hawke for penalties and fines if they breached an Award Government also repealed, or substantially to which they were parties, but since 1969 they have watered down, the provisions of the been •largely untroubled by such requirements. Commonwealth Employees (Employment To monitor compliance with the Act and with Provisions) (CEEP) Act, the Commonwealth Awards, the Fraser Government in 1977 amended Employees (Redeployment Retirement) (CERR) the C A Act to establish an Industrial Relations Act and the Public Service Statutory Authorities Bureau. The Bureau was to investigate and (PSSA)Act which had been introduced by the prosecute breaches of Awards by unions and Fraser Government to handle militancy by the employers alike — a seemingly uncontroversial public sector unions. The "no work as directed task. It was portrayed by the union movement, — no pay" amendments to the PSSA had been however, as a vicious industrial policeman in introduced in 1980 to enable the Commonwealth attempting to obtain union compliance with the to withold pay from staff who, without refusing law, and was actively opposed from its inception. to work altogether, refused to work as directed. One of the Hawke Governments first legislative Once this legislation had been repealed, there actions after its election in 1983 was to abolish it. was no control over public servants who appeared Subsequently the first Hawke Government at work but declined to perform their duties. amended the requirements regulating trade union Whilst not working as directed they were legally rules and audits, generally, easing the existing entitled to full pay, security of employment and none-too-rigorous provisions. For instance, the their massive superannuation entitlements. Not rules of a union were required to provide that full- surprisingly, this change signalled a green light for

20 UNLEASHING THE UNIONS disruption and industrial turmoil in the public One should not totally blame the Arbitration sector, culminating in the strike by customs officers Commission however since its charter is to prevent and tax office officials who refused to collect and settle industrial disputes. Disputes involving Government revenue because their wage claim had militant unions are often most easily settled by been rejected by the Arbitration Commission. As granting them their demands rather than by a result of the "reform" of the PSSA Act the treating them equally with employers in the process Government was forced to sit helpless whilst being of enforcing the law. deprived of revenue; and to pay its public servants at their full rate while they refused to work! After a number of weeks, the Minister was Once this legislation had been repealed, eventually forced to rely upon slow and there was no control over public servants cumbersome stand-down provisions. who appeared at work but declined to To signal the resumption of cosy relations perform their duties. with the public sector unions, the Hawke Government also agreed to restore the facility of The Hawke Governments proposals would collecting union fees from union members. This therefore have had the effect of removing all real facilitated the collection of fees and no doubt barriers to unions engaging in secondary boycotts greatly assisted the unions in amassing the funds if an industrial advantage could be obtained. needed later to fight damaging strikes against the These proposals were too much even for the Government. Why should the Government play Australian Democrats who combined with the debt collector for unions which have the capacity Opposition to defeat the proposals in the Senate. to strike at its very stability? The Hawke Government has not resiled from its But more was to come. In 1977 the Fraser position however, because to do so would incur Government introduced provisions into the Trade the wrath of the . trade union movement. This Practices Act (TPA) to outlaw the practice of further piece of deregulation presumably awaits secondary boycotts in industrial disputes. more fortuitous political circumstances. Secondary boycotts occur where a union in dispute with an employer seeks, either through its own Regulating Management resources or those of kindred unions, to prevent firms supplying the employer (e.g. by arranging While trade unions have been progressively disruption of the suppliers business) or to disrupt the trading activities of the employer other than freed from regulation, wide-reaching increases by enlisting merely the employees directly affected. have occurred in the regulation of management. The TPA provisions allow an action to The most important is the Arbitration prohibit secondary boycotts to be brought in the Commissions decision in the Termination Change Federal Court. Judges, who by the terms of their and Redundancy case. This case was well under commission are obliged to dispense justice way before the Hawke Government was elected but according to law without fear or favour, tend to after that. date the Commonwealth became far treat unions breaking the law like any other citizen. more supportive of the ACTU case, which was also This is anathema to trade unions. In its desire to strongly backed by the State Labor Governments. free trade union activity from restraints, the Hawke In its decision of 2 August 1984 and a Government sought to remove the secondary supplementary decision of 14 December 1984, the boycott provisions from the TPA. Commission indicated that it was prepared to Lest it be thought that this would encourage include terms in Awards providing protection unions to engage in such activities the Government against "unfair dismissals", added benefits to justified its decision by saying that it would make employees whose jobs became redundant, and provision for disputes involving secondary increased requirements for management to consult boycotts to be brought before the Arbitration with trade unions on technological change. Commission, as the apppropriate body to hear Previously, under most Commonwealth such matters. Awards, an employee was engaged on a week-to- The track record of the Arbitration week basis and could be given one weeks notice Commission in treating citizens (including trade before his employment was terminated. The unions) as equal before the law speaks for itself. Arbitration Commission is now of the view that

21 UNLEASHING THE UNIONS

"an employer shall not dismiss an employee in a to control it but obliges him to consult with his manner or for a reason which is harsh, unjust or employees regarding its management. unreasonable". What might amount to a "harsh" This development relating to the control of dismissal will no doubt be much debated, but one management is further reinforced by the recent can imagine a very flexible meaning given to that guidelines issued by the National Labour word by unions with the "industrial muscle" to Consultative Council on Employee Participation. enforce their own interpretations of it. In its guidelines on the sharing of information The Commission also ruled that an employee released in August 1984, the NLCC stated that:- whose employment has been terminated by reason "...the regular and systematic provision of of redundancy should be given the right of accurate and comprehensive information to extended notice (or payment in lieu) on a sliding employees on a range of financial, industrial, scale amounting to 8 weeks where the employee personnel and organisational matters is a vital has been employed for more than 4 years. The element of good employer/employee relations. Commission said that these generous provisions ....an effective system of information sharing would compensate employees for the loss of is an important precondition for the seniority, sick leave "rights", holiday leave loading introduction of employee participation" and and other entitlements which they could not take "....information sharing increases the role of with them to their next job. An employee who is Unions". entitled to 8 weeks notice (or 8 weeks pay in lieu) It certainly does. is entitled to that payment even though he might These guidelines list the subject matter which commence work with a new employer long before may form the content of an "information plan" 8 weeks have elapsed. for employees. This embraces information such Clearly the notion that an employer is obliged as prospects and plans involving mergers and take- to pay an employee a fair price for his services is overs, export performance, research and on the wane. To set up a business and employ development, sales performance and financial people now involves certain welfare obligations matters including the reasons why dividends have which were once thought to belong to the field been paid or not paid. of social policy rather than industrial policy. The implications are clear: the material needs In addition, the Commission decided that to be shared with employees so they cantake an employers be obliged to notify unions of relevant active part in advising management on ways in decisions, and consult with employees as soon as which the business should be managed. Since a firm decision has been taken about major employee representatives (trade union officials) changes in production programmes, organisation exist to further the interests of employees, structure or technology which are likely to have presumably their advice will be directed towards significant effects on employees. This information bettering the position of their members and not is to be provided in writing to employees and their towards bettering the position of the shareholders representatives. However, the employer is exempt to whom the directors of a business are ultimately from disclosing confidential information. responsible. Information relating to technological change While at this stage these are merely guidelines, which is given to employees and their one can easily imagine pilot projects (similar to representatives has the tendency "to fall off the the "affirmative action" pilot projects) being back of a truck". No doubt provision of such introduced and used to justify further demands information may, in certain circumstances, deter in the future. It is clear that what have traditionally an employer from proceeding with major changes been considered employer prerogatives may now in the management and development of his be turned into employee-supervised decisions. business. It is not surprising that the deregulation of The "Termination Case" will substantially trade unions has been accompanied by increased transfer what have been traditionally considered regulation of management. One might have management prerogatives from that category to thought that the two processes were not consistent. the category of supervised decision-making. The In fact they can only be reconciled on the basis fact that an employer may have established a that both advance the interests of the officials who business, and may own it, no longer entitles him control our powerful trade unions.

22 Workers Control

by Barry Maley

The Hawke Governments policy of `industrial democracy has immense implications for the efficiency and vigour of private enterprise and Government departments in Australia.

Few subjects are discussed in a more confused, and transfer control over assets and the and confusing, way than the proper role of an deployment of labour from the owners and employee in controlling the work he does or in managers to employees, trade union officials and exercising a more extended role, beyond his industrial courts. This can be brought about immediate job, in controlling the organisation in (and it is now openly on the agenda of which that work is done. In debates on such government and trade unions) through: matters, `industrial democracy is the favoured • the legislatively-enforced transfer of rights of term of those who wish to appropriate the rosy ownership and control over assets from hue of the word `democracy for issues which existing private owners to the body of workers have little to do with political democracy. in an organisation or to those elected or `Worker participation or, less rosily, `worker appointed by the trade unions represented in control are somewhat more specific but by no the organisation; means capture the wide range of matters - • legislation requiring equally-shared rights of practical, theoretical and ideological, — which organisational control and decision-making are discussed in the extensive and often turgid between `owners and employees (or trade literature on the subject. unions) — often referred to as `co-determination; Transferring Control to Unions • minority representation of employees/trade unions on the controlling bodies (e.g. boards At the heart of the debate is the of directors) of organisations — i.e. `worker fundamental issue of who should have the right directors; to control decisions affecting organisational • government regulations or determinations by assets and the engagement and deployment of tribunals which establish employee rights (e.g. labour. Until a few years ago, before the systems of appeal against retrenchment or systematic attack on property rights by dismissal, severance payments, occupational governments and trade+ unions, the common health and safety obligations on employers) or view — the `consensus if you like — was that the which require that organisations must follow legitimate owners of assets (machinery, certain procedures in controlling and buildings, land, goods of various kinds) had managing their employees (e.g. requirements control over them. In a business situation, to `consult on technological changes or to owners could conclude contracts with workers divulge `information). which provided that those workers, in return for What such measures have in common is the a wage and other benefits, would work with driving of a wedge between ownership and those assets in ways prescribed in the freely-made control. Once one loses control over an asset (a contract, under the supervision of the owner or house, a car, a tool, a business) nominal rights of the owners manager. ownership become meaningless, and those who Among the many different practices and control that asset can use it or ruin it in any way proposals which fall under the heading of they choose and the owner is powerless to stop `industrial democracy, the most alarming are them. those which will destroy this basic arrangement Most of us rarely think about the complex

23 WORKERS CONTROL system of rights and expectations that underlies democracy say, of course, is that `worker the way in which the large and small participation is really an extension of ownership organisations of our economy deliver the milk, rights more generally throughout the or mine the coal or make the cars, or sell the community; a consummation, in economic groceries upon which we depend. When the affairs, of the political democracy we value so corner delicatessen owner sells me some olives much. So, if it changes rights, it will change we have a straightforward transaction between a them for the better because it will give workers person who `owns something (olives and `the right to influence organisational decisions perhaps the shop in which theyre housed) and a which affect them, it will distribute control over customer who offers money in exchange. We property more equitably, it will lead to less accept that the shop-owner has a `right to put a alienated, better motivated, more satisfied price on his olives and to determine the employees, improved organisational decision- conditions under which they are offered for sale, making and hence a more prosperous economy provided those conditions are hygenic, honest, from which all will benefit. But while it may be etc. Correspondingly, I, as the customer with true that there are no `natural; immutable money in my pocket, have the right either to property or ownership rights but simply the conclude the exchange or go somewhere else for established practices of a society which may be my olives. Two sets of decisions are at stake here, changed as the society evolves, it is nevertheless one belonging to each of the parties. Each set of the case that the distant effects of established decisions is `legitimate in terms of accepted practices, and the consequences of changing rights — the ownership rights of the shopkeeper them, may not be fully understood or foreseen, in his olives and my ownership of `my money. and that altering them may have results which cause serious damage to the whole society and create grave injustices. The dispossession of property rights - Indeed, it is just these sorts of unforeseen loss of control over goods — is involved consequences that flow from destroying the link in some forms of industrial democracy between owning assets and controlling them effectively which have contributed to the malaise We should think it strange if the of the economies and the world of work in shopkeepers employee (i.e. somebody who has China, Russia and Eastern Europe, including freely contracted to exchange his labour for Yugoslavia, which is often held up as a model by wages), simply by being an employee, acquired `industrial democracy proponents. And, within power to determine the price at which the the West itself, some of the disabling effects of shopkeeper sold his olives, or to determine more modest tampering with effective control - whether olives are sold at all. We would readily such as West German `co-determination — are see that the shopkeeper had lost control of his becoming painfully apparent. But more of this, business and that an important part of his and of the false justifications offered for these ownership rights had been given, in effect, to radical measures, in a moment; there are a somebody else. Most Australians would regard it number of worker participation or industrial as unjust if this happened to the shopkeeper; just democracy measures which have been taken as they would regard it as unjust if the mechanic voluntarily and which have evolved they hired to repair their car was given, in spontaneously out of the industrial scene, which addition to full payment for his services, the should first be mentioned. right or `prerogative to use the car for a period In a competitive, capitalist economy where after it had been repaired. Yet it is exactly that there is freedom of entry into industries and kind of dispossession of ownership rights, of occupations, unhindered by licences, quotas, loss of control over their goods, which some closed shops, demarcation rules, restrictive forms of `industrial democracy envisage for the practices, government-supported monopolies, owners of Australian enterprises. and so on, there is a ceaseless search for new and better ways of doing things and organising Unforeseen Consequences enterprises — including the better employment and supervision of men and women. Out of this But what the proponents of industrial search and out of the free collective bargaining

24 WORKERS CONTROL between management and labour have arisen a if workers are prepared to meet part of the costs variety of arrangements which may be included (assuming they are most costly) by trading under the heading of worker-participation and satisfaction for less wages. If the benefits, in industrial democracy. Such things, for example, terms of increased profits, exceed the costs of as: such proposals there is every incentive in a • share ownership and profit-sharing schemes capitalist society for such things to appear out of for employees; the competitive scramble. Yet the reality is that • consultative councils established by those measures which break the link between management and having no powers of control ownership and control — which is essential for but designed to improve communication and the proper, conscientious management of assets co-ordination between management and --- can only come about through legislative employees; coercion of government, the fiats of industrial • re-designing work groups, relations between tribunals, or unconstrained intimidation by work groups and individual jobs to: unions. One can only conclude that pleas for — improve performance their introduction on the grounds that they will — improve worker satisfaction contribute to economic efficiency are grounded — achieve greater flexibility and co- either in ignorance or humbug and, if the latter, ordination, by such means as `job that what is really being sought is the transfer of enrichment, `semi-autonomous work control over assets (ownership) from one party groups, `quality circles, joint to another. management-worker committees and The argument in terms of enhanced related methods. efficiency, therefore, is highly suspect on these This is the merest summary of an immense grounds alone. It becomes untenable when we variety of innovations initiated by owners and examine the actual operation of worker control managements, often stimulated by the theories in Yugoslavia and co-determination in Germany. and recommendations of social scientists and management consultants. The actual Yugoslav Experience contribution of such initiatives to more efficient and effective organisations is often hotly The Yugoslavian firm debated, but the important point is the • is worker-managed and controlled, voluntary, experimental, spontaneous character • but the workers do not own the capital assets of these activities. What is remarkable, therefore, of their firm, is that nowhere, in an otherwise free society, has • their rights to a share in the firms revenue and there been the same spontaneous appearance of internal control exist only while they work in those more radical industrial democracy and the firm; they are not saleable or transferable worker participation measures — such as `co- and, because of this, they have no tradeable determination, `worker-directors, `job `equity in the assets or revenue of the firm or ownership or direct transfers of control to their own jobs as it is understood in capitalist employees — which have been urged either in the societies. name of equity or efficiency. Yet, if they are In short, the Yugoslavian system drives a more efficient, why have they not happened wedge between ownersip and control. The naturally? workers control the firm but they do not own it. There is no legal impediment to firms The result is that they have a strong incentive to putting workers on their boards of directors. use their powers of control in such a way as to Firms and their contracting workers can agree, if convert the capital assets of the firm (which they they wish, to formally involve workers in dont own) into income upon which they do have controlling councils, decisions about production a claim. The outcome, as might be expected, is methods, and offer permanent tenure. For their that plant and equipment is not adequately part, workers (or their unions) can start firms of maintained or replaced, stock is used up, revenue their own and, if they choose, borrow capital, is distributed in the form of personal income and hire equipment and hire technical (including insufficient is retained in the firm for investment managerial) expertise. More satisfying, less in the future. Yugoslavian industry is relatively `alienating jobs can be contracted into existence inefficient, inflation and unemployment are

25 WORKERS CONTROL

high, investment is low and the economy supervisory boards have been issues. Not stagnant. At the heart of these failures is the surprisingly, board information that bears upon separation of ownership and control and the jobs and wages has been divulged, illegally, by destruction thereby of positive incentives to use worker representatives on boards to trade assets responsibly and efficiently. It is consumers unions. — and all workers are consumers — who suffer. The fundamental problems that afflict the The structure of property rights and Yugoslavian firm reappear in the `co- organisational control encourages the erosion of determined firm. capital and productive capacity, the diversion of assets into personal consumption by workers, the Outrageous attacks on the right to work dissipation of effective control, and the substitution of political wrangling for rational have come from closed shops, minimum decision-making. wage laws, and restrictive practices of unions. German Experience "Co-determination shifts the responsibility The German system of co-determination for decisions to a group of people who are not has a long and complex history, but its modern at all affected by the consequences of the form did not arise naturally from industrial decisions. No matter what the outcome of the experimentation but was forced upon the decision is, the worker receives contractual wages Germans by the victorious allies after World War — his risk is Iimited. Co-determination puts II, mainly on the insistence of the British Labour stockholders into an uninviting situation — if Government of the day which believed that if the corporation makes an investment decision only the workers had had a say in German that is successful, the gains are shared with industry (especially steel and coal) before the labour. If, on the other hand, the investment War there might not have been a war. The system decision is not successful stockholders alone of co-determination as it has since evolved is the bear the losses. Co-determination violates the creature of government legislation urged on by risk — reward relationship which, in turn, must the labour unions. In essence it endows non- •raise the cost (reduce the supply) of equity owners (the workers) with equal control via an capital"! equal number of seats on the `supervisory board If the argument for legislatively-coerced (similar to a board of directors) in those firms industrial democracy in the name of enchanted (about 470) with more than 2000 employees. efficiency begins to fall apart when we look at This outcome has had a number of legislative the facts, what of the argument in terms of stages since the Montan Act of 1951, the Works equity and justice? Constitution Act of 1952 and the Co- determination Act of 1976. Democratic Theory It is too early to assess fully the consequences of the 1976 Act, but much is Democracy is a means of establishing a already evident. For instance, it has become system of government. customary for the two groups on the board - It does not, of itself, guarantee that the laws the shareholder representatives and the passed by such a government will be just, employees representatives — to meet separately equitable or efficient, but it usually means that before a board meeting and work out their laws passed by a democratically-elected respective positions. Board meetings are thus not legislature are more likely to be seen as opportunities for a genuine sharing of views but legitimate. By analogy, industrial democracy in adversarial encounters and bargaining organisations would not guarantee that the exchanges. Volkswagens decision to open a plant decisions made by democratically-elected in the U.S.A. was delayed for two years for these governors will be just, equitable or efficient or reasons. Wrangles over information and illicit more likely to be so. Indeed, as we have seen, disclosure of confidential information given to there is strong evidence that they would not be.

Pejovich, Stev, Co-determination in the West: The Case of Germany, Heritage Foundation, Washington, 1982, p.18

26 WORKERS CONTROL

. If it could be demonstrated to a democratic crucial part played by a system of ownership and government that industrial democracy would be property rights, developed over centuries, which unjust, inequitable and inefficient, and if, in the serves to `socialise things in the sense that it light of that knowledge, such a government ruled brings objects into a human order in a way which against industrial democracy, would that allows that human order to deal with them (i.e. (democratic) ruling be readily accepted because `property or `commodities) in an orderly, "those affected by the decision had influenced systematic and predictable way. the decision" by exercising their electoral rights? If my society is satisfied that I `own It seems that it ought to be so accepted as something, I, and other people, know that I can legitimate and as democratically establishing a control and use it in certain ways, that I can `non-democratic mode of decision-making in make plans for its use and that I and others can organisations. be joined purposively in those plans, and so on In a richly interconnected and in ever-widening and interconnected circles. My interdependent society like ours, there is no life, my way of life, my motives, my energies significant social, political or economic decision become intimately attached to those things which doesnt affect somebody or some group which stand in that special relationship to me in remote from the actual decision, and more such a way as to give my life a special vigour and usually it will affect hundreds with all sorts of purpose, which may, in turn, be noted by others different interests in the decision, and affect who shape their plans in terms of mine. If I own them in a multitude of different ways. Must they an enterprise, or if several people share all, therefore, be `involved in such decisions? It ownership of an enterprise, that fact, and the is plainly absurd to suggest this and, being so, presumptions which go with it, is the foundation the principle is seen as a ridiculous one which, upon which mutual employment and far from distributing power more equitably, in cooperation may be based. fact renders everyone powerless before the But when the bond of ownership is broken, weight of a meaningless, disembodied `majority a form of connection of things to persons is whose abstract legitimacy would in fact be seized profoundly changed with vital consequences for upon and used by organised minorities to justify the effective and efficient employment of ends remote from • the real wishes of the economic resources and life in general. When individuals who compose the `majority. things in general, or complex enterprises, Yet the Federal Minister for Employment become `common property, when everybody and Industrial Relations declares that: `The owns everything, nobody owns anything. essence of industrial democracy is the right of Unowned things are usually treated badly and employees to influence decisions affecting their when costly human artefacts (e.g. public trains) working lives. Insofar as this slogan has any real are treated badly there is a loss, eventually, to all content at all, it ought to consist in the right of of us. We each, ultimately, pay the cost. But individuals to choose when and where they will when individuals are attached to things by the offer their services to those who want to buy bond of ownership they care for what they own them. But the most outrageous attacks on that and a resource is therefore sustained not only for right have come from closed shops, minimum the benefit of that individual but also for others wage laws, pickets, and the restrictive practices who may benefit from their attachment to that of unions aided and abetted by industrial individual and that resource — the attachment, tribunals. for example, of the employees to the delicatessen What rights to "influence those decisions shop and its owner. which affect their working lives" have been given Rights of ownership, therefore, have to those tens of thousands of young men and profound implications for incentives which are women who have been excluded from a working essential for the creation and husbanding of life by absurd minimum wage decisions enforced resources upon which we all depend. To hand by tribunals, governments and unions? over the resources of industry to controlling non- In all of this, what is overlooked is the owners is to ensure their misuse and destruction.

27 Youth Ditches the Left The U.S. Experience

Greg Sheridan

Neglect of so-called "youth issues" and "womens issues" has been cited as a reason for the lack of success of the Liberal Party in recent elections in Australia. Yet in America in the November 1984 election President Reagan won strong support from youth and women. Greg Sheridan examines the reasons for Reagans success.

One of the most significant and intriguing American party politics, with the Republicans aspects of the American presidential election last attaining permanent majority status. November is the extraordinary degree of support The American liberal establishment has the President gained among young people. proposed a number of self-serving theories to I happened to be in the USA for much of explain this extraordinary phenomenon. The the campaign and it was remarkable to see the major one is a variant of the theme which they septuagenarian president wildly cheered and use to explain Reagans general support welcomed wherever he spoke on a campus, to see throughout the country. They argue that the huge crowds of students who turned out to American youth, especially middle-class youth, support Reagan and, to a much lesser degree, have become selfish, are no longer interested in George Bush. idealistic causes and vote simply to get the best On the other hand Walter Mondale and deal for their wallets. Geraldine Ferraro aroused little enthusiasm This is a typically self-serving liberal among students, with Mondale even delusion. There is no empirical evidence that complaining that young Republicans on campus American voters, old or young, are any less were turning up to heckle him, and preventing idealistic now than at any time in the recent past. him from getting his message across. Given the However, the strength of Reagans appeal to penchant of militant students for the most vile the young is worth analysing in some detail to behaviour through the sixties and seventies in see if there are any lessons for conservative order to stop Conservative spokesmen from politicians in other parts of the world appearing on campus, this seemed to some, even Firstly, the phenomenon of Reaganism does if they didnt approve of the young Republicans not exist in a political vacuum. The conservative behaviour, a sweet irony. intellectual revolution, which has swept 1984 was the first election in decades in America, is full to the brim with idealism, and as which the youngest group of electors voted more such has an immense appeal to Americas young. heavily Republican than the second youngest The new conservatism embodies many and group of voters, who voted more heavily sometimes contradictory themes, but one that is Republican than the third youngest group of paramount is patriotism. voters. The result could be portentous. If the Patriotism is one of the most powerful young people who voted Republican last year contemporary forces in America. It shows no continue to identify themselves as Republican, sign of degenerating into jingoism, or even and vote Republican in 1988, they could provide isolationism. It is simply a pride in, and love of, the basis of the long-awaited realignment in America. This feeling is pervasive throughout

Ed. Note. liberal, in ncc American context, is associated with left of centre views.

28 L.L. ^a 1.^ _^I LT^:1

. : t i j; t] •. IE1E1IBAE41WiRIftNIWfS1IIE

C " J \ ^ v E /r^it x.18- I!4 iu W 3i t6^ tit iA ^ ii

a{^-7 t .. .. imitin oVL ^fir,4,It t.i ^ AI .:1 ^ .rte Ef t :^.d : ; _^3 .^1., ^ lz^ +1_^

THE key issue in the whole debate on tax reform is in danger of being over- Ii looked. //

The crucial problem is the burden of .- government taxes. Unless policies are P adopted to contain the growth of government taxes then the benefits of any tax reform will be short-lived. The visit of J. Peter Grace to Australia — described by the Press as President Reagans chief cost cutter -- highlighted one major reform which needs to be taken; cutting Government waste and inefficiency. In short, the Grace Commission presented President Reagan with an alternative to raising taxes. The Grace Commission in the U.S. indicated that at least 13 per cent of budget outlays could be saved by cutting out waste and inefficiency. d f , `^. ^^^" ^;.^ A. a^ a,^ C^^ ^] t ! In the context of the Australian ^r ^ • ^/^ ^ ^ tea ^^ ^ ^^. =^i ^s a`^ ,. 1 a^^ ^ : a c ^.,. Government budget this would represent close to $8 billion. Peter Grace was appointed by President Reagan in February 1982 to head a private sector enquiry into public sector waste. The enquiry, called the Presidents Private PETER GRACE described the workings of his Commission to the Prime Minister, Sector Survey on Cost Control, became Mr. Hawke, during a two hour meeting in Canberra. known as the Grace Commission. After 18 months work the Grace The Minister for Finance, Senator Peter Federation by Ian McLachlan and the Commission produced a report with 2428 Walsh, and the Minister for Industrial Institute of Public Affairs (NSW) by Sir specific recommendations on how to Relations, Mr. Ralph Willis, also attended Eric McClintock. achieve US $424 billion of savings over a the meeting. The message Peter Grace conveyed to the three-year period. The IPA was represented by our Prime Minister was that his experience in Peter Graces visit to Australia was President, Charles Goode, the Treasurer, the U.S.A showed that government sponsored by the Institute of Public Affairs. Hugh Morgan, and the Director, Rod expenditure can be significantly cut Co-sponsors were: Australian Chamber of Kemp. provided there is sufficient political will. Commerce, Australian Mining Industry The Australian Chamber of Commerce Mr. Grace pointed out that the Council, Business Council of Australia, was represented by Ken Court, the Business Commission did not attack the substance Confederation of Australian Industry, Council of Australia by Jim Kirk, the or existence of any federal programme, it Institute of Public Affairs (NSW) and the Confederation of Australian Industry by was concerned with how services could be National Farmers Federation. Ken Williams, the National Farmers delivered more efficiently. Community leaders hear the Grace message

The Grace Report highlighted many examples of government waste and inefficiency. Here are just a few.

Food stamp fraud totalled $1 billion in 1981, or 10 per cent of the programs benefits. Civil service and military retirees collect three and six times, respectively, the total lifetime pension benefits of their counterparts in the private sector. Bringing these retirement plans into line with those in the private sector would save $58.1 billion over three years. The average estimated costs of 25 major THE private sector can take a leading Bob Gottliebsen, the well-known weapons systems that were started in the role in persuading the government to financial journalist, wrote that: 1970s increased 223 per cent before delivery, reduce waste and inefficiency. an added charge to taxpayers of $234 "Australias business community was billion. This was the message that J. Peter being inspired by Peter Grace to push for The Agency for International Grace gave to some 700 leaders from government cuts on a scale that had never been seen before" Development spent $3 million to buy business, government and academia vehicles for projects in the Middle East. Of during his visit. Mr. Grace pointed out that in order to these 399 cars and trucks, five are missing, Two major functions were held, one at carry out his work for President Reagan he 93 are used for personal transport, 84 have the Victorian Arts Centre in Melbourne and enlisted the assistance of the private sector. been idle for up to two years, and the other at the Regent Hotel in Sydney. Over 160 top executives were recruited from uncounted others have been commandeered Mr. Graces message was well received. private business and other organisations to by host-country officials. The Business Review Weekly wrote that: chair and staff 36 task forces with more Productivity levels for private sector than 2,000 of their professionals. "The capacity audience of about 340 maintenance workers are as much as 50 per stood and applauded Graces tirade More than 850 companies donated cent higher than the average for comparable against waste in government spending people, money and/or services and federal workers. Improving the productivity and his plea to shift the attitudes of equipment with a value totalling more than of these federal workers to the level of politicians towards what is `politically $75 million. Not one cent came from the comparable private sector workers would feasible". federal government. cut federal maintenance costs by $1.1 billion over three years. About 60 per cent of the 82 special and deputy assistant positions in the Environmental Protection Agency do not Government growth threatens freedoms require performance of functions that Past trends in government spending must be stopped says Charles Goode justify these titles and salaries. Restructuring these titles would save $11 The growth of government threatens our the level of government expenditure and million over three years. political and economic freedoms, the marshal] public attitudes against it. President of the IPA, Charles Goode, said Using year-end personnel limits to at the dinner held for Peter Grace in "We want public opinion to be such that control the numbers of federal employees, Melbourne. a Minister no longer gets applauded when agencies "fire" some employees for one day he announces a new public expenditure at year-end, then "rehire" them the next day. "ln Australia government expenditure initiative. We want shadow Ministers to see In this way, the agencies comply with their has gone up in the last ten years from 32 as their major task the critical examination personnel ceilings — at significant cost to per cent of our national output to 43 per of public expenditure. taxpayers. If these ceilings were removed, the Air Force alone would save $96 million cent. "The second step we need to address is over three years. the question of what government "This trend just cannot continue if we are expenditure should be cut. This is a difficult One quarter of all federal white-collar going to have the mixed economy to which question, partly because of the lack of employees are in jobs that pay at the wrong we are accustomed. information we have. level or the wrong title. These incorrect classifcations cost the government an extra "At the IPA we consider there are two "President Reagan asked Peter Grace to $682 million a year. In Washington D.C. positive steps to combat the trend for answer this question when he appointed a alone, nearly one third of all federal jobs increased government expenditure. The first committee of enquiry and he came up with are at salary levels higher than they should step is to make the public more aware of 2428 specific answers". be. Hugh Morgan says Australia can learn from Grace

Australias problem with government spending is even more deep-seated than the U.S, according to IPA Treasurer, Hugh Morgan.

"In the United States their response was legitimately playing an independent which exemplify the corporate commitment the Grace Commission. In Australia our political role within society and I hasten to to health and vigor in American public response to date is a tax summit, the say this role is not politically partisan. debate in addition to the better known and purpose of which is to relegitimise the "They fund literally scores of substantially funded American Enterprise current level of government spending, 43 independent institutes which take an active Institute, the Heritage Foundation, the per cent of the GDP. and vigorous part in American intellectual Brookings Institute and the Manhattan Institute to name a few. "Another contrast between Australian life. and American society is this: American "Accuracy in Media, the Institute of corporations, unlike Australian Humane Studies, the Rockford Institute, "This is something of which we in corporations generally, see themselves as for example, are very small organisations Australia should take note".

requires constant attention to managerial prolonged managerial inefficiency or Terms of reference of efficiency and the effective use of resources persistent failure to control costs. Such in a competitive arena. The unforgiving consequences have historically been avoided The Grace Commission tests of both the balance sheet and the in the public sector — or, more accurately, marketplace must be met. postponed — by Governments propensity On June 30 1982, President Reagan issued to increase tax revenue, engage in deficit an executive order which established the "Failure to meet the demands of either spending, and spend yet more money on "Presidents Private Sector Survey on Cost will, in time, bring the enterprise to an end, failed programs with the result of masking Control in the Federal Government". with the attendant consequences not only their ineffectiveness. to management but to the investors, The terms of reference included the following. employees, suppliers, customers and the "The members of the Presidents Private community as well. In short, the private Sector Survey on Cost Control (PPSS) "The Committee shall conduct a private sector cannot operate with a continuing and believe that the disciplines necessary for sector survey on cost control in the Federal growing deficit. survival and success in the private arena Government and shall advise the President must be introduced into Government to a and the Secretary of Commerce, and other "Failure to operate efficiently and to far greater degree than previously had been Executive agency heads with respect to ensure a satisfactory return to investors will the case. improving management and reducing costs. cause private sector enterprise to fail, with "The Committee shall conduct in-depth devastating effects on all its components - "It is that belief which motivated the reviews of the operations of the Executive particularly its employees. PPSS effort. A government which cannot agencies as a basis of evaluating potential efficiently manage the peoples money and improvements in agency operations. "Government has no such incentive to the peoples business will ultimately fail its "In fulfilling its functions the Committee survive, let alone succeed, nor any such test citizenry by failing the same inescapable test shall consider providing recommendations to meet. The Government, unlike private which disciplines the private sector: those in the following areas: sector enterprise, is not normally managed of the competitive marketplace and of the as if it were subject to the consequences of balance sheet:. I. opportunites for increased efficiency and reduced costs in the Federal Government that can be realised by Executive action or legislation; 2. areas where managerial accountability can be enhanced and administrative A Grace Commission for control can be improved; 3. opportunities for managerial Australia? improvements over both the short and long term; Rod Kemp, Director, IPA. 4. specific areas where further study can be There has never been a government "razor gang" with the scope and expertise justified by potential savings; and of the U.S. Grace Commission in Australia. 5. information and data relating to governmental expenditures, Paul Keatings Expenditure Review Public service pensions, overmanning, indebtedness, and personnel Committee announced cuts in the May inefficiencies in social security provisions management" mini-budget amounting to just under 2 per will strike a responsive cord among public cent of proposed government expenditures sector analysts in Australia. — significantly below the 13 per cent cuts Recognising the limitations of previous proposed by the Grace Commission. The Private Sector role government efficiency reviews President This review of government expenditure, Why did President Reagan believe the Reagan developed a new structure to come like the Fraser Governments razor gang in private sector was particularly qualified to up with practical recommendations to save 1980 and the Bland Committee in 1976 was undertake the huge role of cutting the taxpayers funds. staffed by public servants; whereas the government expenditure? Grace Commission was a private sector It was a bold step and has produced dramatic results. Already some $110 billion War on Waste, answered review of the public sector. The Report, of the Reports recommendations have been this question in the following terms. Certainly features of the Grace Commission relate to specific problems accepted. It has also had the important effect of helping to educate the public on "Private sector management is driven by with the U.S. Federal Government structure. the excesses of government. the need to ensure the enterprises continued However, what is also apparent is that many economic survival. This is a precondition of the problems and areas of waste There is no reason why a similar for profit or any other measure of success highlighted by Peter Grace have their commission in Australia could not produce and the satisfaction of this precondition counterpart in Australia. significant savings for the taxpayer. lei S.-. — . ell" In 1s VhX Sul- nwnr• 1 REAGANS RAZOR GA ate a SHOWS HOW TO CUT 0 Australian businessmen are chief executive officers and at about to get some ideas on private-sector volunteers (sv is ca aats. managers and sys how to help government cialitsl were involved in the cave taxpayers long study. The private-sec gang produced about 47 repot to save American taxpayers .. lion (about 15 percent of the lack off more, says eagafl 4 razor mall nts ^;:;>, de?Jorpuh!;r.

Could the projected savings of 422 billion dollars (US) over three years (the Grace Commission) be translated into A$8000-9000 million dollars over three years in Australia. JUDGE FOR YOURSELF -- HEAR MR. J. PETER GRACE CHAIRMAN OF PRESIDENT REAGANS PRIVATE SECTOR SURVEY ON COST CONTROL An audio recording of his speech in Sydney when he spoke both here and in Melbourne under the sponsorship of the Institute of Public Affairs and five other major business organisations. PLUS `CUTTING THE SIZE OF GOVERNMENT Produced by I.P.A. to give the Australian picture. This contains useful information to have at your fingertips when Government Expenditure is discussed. • Just how does Mr. Hawke compare with • Where are we going at this rate? the previous six Prime Ministers in • How do we compare on the World Government Expenditure Performance? Scene? • What are the revenues of the 10 largest • Just how have taxes soared, over the Government "Businesses"? last 30 years? - ------I

ORDER FORM NAME Pleasesend me ...... ADDRESS MR. J. PETER GRACE tapes POSTCODE plus CUTTING THE SIZE OF GOVERNMENT booklet PAYMENT OPTIONS 0 I enclose my cheque for$ made payable to the Institute of Public Affairs Post paid at $20 per set. q Please charge my bankcard Expiry Date ...... Cardholders Total $ signature 49fi m 1 m H I YOUTH AND THE LEFT the USA, and crosses age groups .and party example, that minimum wage laws have affiliations. The old-time 1970s guilt is passe. disproportionately hurt young people and Even rock stars of the ilk of Bruce Springsteen blacks, in denying them job opportunities. The affirm America with such songs as "Born in the proponents of the free market in the USA, USA". Indeed, USA was a favorite chant at including its young proponents, do not see their Reagan rallies. programme as lacking in compassion. Rather it Secondly, the conservative intellectual is the undeniable failure of big government to revolution has affected bright students at keep its promises that has led them to a universities. Bright students are notorious for reappraisal. Now they believe that there is a their tendency to rebel. against orthodoxy. The harmony between older American virtues of American Left-liberal establishment is still the freedom, self-reliance and opportunity, determinant of what is orthodox on American tempered by compassion and emergency relief. campuses. But this seeming victory for the Left has its problems, for the brighter students are now politically active conservatives. Across You cant capture the imagination of a America, conservative political student activism healthy 18 year-old by offering him a is flowering. future of bureaucrats; you can perhaps Whether it be the ideologically tough capture his imagination by offering him a campus Republicans, committed to free enterprise at home and anti-communism abroad, future of opportunity. pro-life groups, students in support of the Committee for the Free World, groups Part of Reagans strength comes from the expressing solidarity with Eastern Bloc way he effectively ignores pressure groups who dissidents, orthodox Catholic activitists, claim to speak on behalf of large segments of the evangelists or whatever, the energy, the vigour, the strength and the vision are with the Right. population and instead speaks to those segments of the population directly himself. Reagans strength among the young shows Thus the League of Women Voters, by no how anodyne and uninspiring, and ultimately how futile, is an attempt to win the young by means an extreme feminist group, for the first promising more government programmes aimed time endorsed a candidate, and that candidate at youth. Walter Mondale was the candidate of was Walter Mondale. Mondale supported all the government programmes and he got creamed feminist positions, abortion on demand, support more heavily in the 18-24 age group than in any of the Equal Rights Amendment etc. All the other. You cant capture the imagination of a feminist groups supported Mondale ahead of healthy 18 year-old by offering him a future of Reagan. bureaucrats; you can perhaps capture his But Ronald Reagan has never believed that imagination by offering him a future of feminists speak on behalf of most women. Self- opportunity. appointed spokesmen really only speak for Economic self-interest undoubtedly played themselves. Instead Ronald Reagan spoke a part in the way the young voted, as it plays a directly to American women, he spoke about part in the way most people vote on most family life, about old-time values, he spoke occasions. Americans en masse simply did not about law and order and the fight against crime, believe that the solutions to their economic he spoke about his own deep conviction that problems lay in the higher taxes proposed by abortion is murder. Mondale. And the result? A majority of American However, that is not for a moment to accept women, like a majority of American youth, the liberal slander that the young are immorally voted for Reagan. It appears that most selfish and insensitive to the plight of the poor. Americans think of themselves politically first as There is an overwhelming belief in America that citizens of America, and only secondly as part of only through lower taxes, less regulation, and the some classification, such as youth, or women or restoration of incentive and opportunity can the whatever. Thus a political leader who lot of the poor be significantly improved. communicates a clear, forceful, relatively There is a consensus among economists, for integrated, coherent vision has a better chance of

29 YOUTH AND THE LEFT capturing their support than does a leader who break the circle of poverty then new jobs must be panders to specific demands by generally self- provided and these can only be provided by appointed spokesmen or women for specific private enterprise. He seeks to make the social groups. security system work to help black families The one group for whom this generalisation rather than to act as an incentive for their most obviously does not hold is blacks. dissolution. American blacks have unfortunately been Jack Kemp is the Republican with the convinced, partly, though not entirely, by a self- greatest access to black leadership. It appears serving black political leadership, that the only that a signficant number of blacks are starting to way for the black community to advance take his ideas seriously. There is, of course, economically is through direct political already a black conservative movement, one of intervention. It is a view which almost every whose heroes is Thomas Sowell. Whether that other American group has abandoned. In movement grows, and whether Kemps approach electoral terms it damages the. Republicans proves successful, remains to be seen, but it is so because the black political process is far the most honest and vigorous Republican overwhelmingly identified with the Democratic response to the lack of Republican support party. among blacks. The Republican response is interesting. One The lessons of Reagans appeal to the young group of small `c conservative Republicans tends and to women is that mainstream people who are to write-off the black vote altogether. Another not alienated from their society can be won by a group, the dwindling liberal Republicans, tends coherent vision as opposed to pork-barrelling. to bid against Democrats in terms of government And the Republicans take the view that even programmes. Blacks naturally regard this as those who are alienated are best won back by ridiculous. demonstrating that the vision can include them The third response is best embodied in New too. York Congressman Jack Kemp, and it is the Of course, it takes a certain political approach which in the long-run has the greatest courage, and a certain political competence, to chance of yielding the Republicans results. Kemp champion a vision and a programme which cut makes a direct appeal to black communities to across the interests of self-appointed vote Republican out of measured self-interest. bureaucratic elites who claim to speak on behalf He demostrates the way blacks have suffered of large groups of people. It is far easier for a through mininum wage laws and regulation of politician to try to stitch up all kinds of deals small business. He proposes that urban renewal, with the professional political manipulators. and the revitalisation of communities in which That is the essence of the corporatism now in blacks live, can be assisted by the creation of vogue in Australia. Ronald Reagan has shown enterprise zones. He points out that if they are to that it is not the only way.

30 "Work, Discipline and Emulation" the new French socialist education policy

a special correspondent

In Australia, the symptoms of declining standards in our educational institutions are widespread. In the last "Review" Dame and David Dyer, Headmaster of a leading private school, examined aspects of this decline. In France the socialist government has responded positively to the bankruptcy of the radical philosophies and policies which continue to have such an influence on schooling in Australia.

Is Jean-Jacques Rousseaus (educational) ghost secondary school teacher unions, enjoys close about to be laid to rest in France? links with the Socialist Party. (Its then General Of the new winds blowing in the country Secretary received a Ministerial appointment one of that most unexpected has been the when the Socialists assumed power in 1981). recently appointed Education Ministers cry of Such is the FENs hegemony in the "enough" to what he sees as an insidious white- educational world that no policy initiatives were anting of the countrys educational standards. considered capable of getting to first base For years successive Governments (nominally of without its blessing. And the FENs educational the Right) have embraced the soft option in philosophy is unequivocally anti-elitist. It is not education — elimination of examinations in surprising, but no less forgivable, that successive favour of continuous assessment, abolition of Governments under the "ancien regime" streaming and emphasis on "thematic" learning embraced FEN-inspired measures, culminating rather than absorbing hard facts and figures by in the reforms bearing the name of Mr.Haby, Mr. rote. This deterioration in standards may come Giscard DEstaings Education Minister. The as a surprise to foreigners imbued with French slide was not initiated by the May 1968 events educations elitist reputation. but received a mighty push from them. As early France is of course not the only country to as 1947, a plan for reform of the educational have embraced the predominant "progressive" sytem, was commissioned from Mr. Wallen, an educational philosophies of the 1960s and 1970s, active Communist sympathiser with radical but, in an educational environment permeated views on the subject. by politics, these have been promoted by a The results of this abnegation of seemingly unstoppable juggernaut in the form of responsibility are as eloquent as inevitable. the Federation de LEducation Nationale (FEN). According to the Ministry of Education itself, Only some 25 per cent of the overall French some 20 per cent of pupils enter secondary labour force is unionised (about one-half of the school unable to read fluently and, for example, United Kingdom and Australian rates), but close knowledge of pre-revolution French history is to 60 per cent of teachers belong to 49 unions almost non-existent. The problems created by affiliated to FEN which, while incorporating an lumping pupils into the same class irrespective of important Communist minority among the capacity have been magnified in the major cities

31 WORK, DISCIPLINE AND EMULATION by the presence of large numbers of immigrant utilitarian motives of education policy and children — in large measure North Africans with calling for increased emphasis on "awakening" severe assimiliation problems. themes, claimed that true education depends However impenetrable the arcane more on what young people experience than arguments of educational specialists may appear what they learn from school books. to ordinary mortals, users of the service have left no doubt as to their judgment. Concerned parents have voted with their feet. The numbers As from the next school year the three of pupils opting for private schools (about 90 per Rs make a triumphant return and history cent run by the Roman Catholic Church) has instruction will revert to its old methods started to increase over the past couple of years based on chronology and inculcation of and currently account for about 15 per cent of dates. the total. The natural reaction of the FEN and its vociferous ally, the CNAL (Comite national This same Mr. Chevenement, in his new daction laique), to this unwelcome competition role, has adroitly defused the public/private was to increase pressure on President Mitterrand debate by recognising the private sectors right to to honour his election pledge to absorb private continued existence — action which needless to schools into the public system. In passing, it is say has provoked the wrath of many Socialist interesting to note that the President himself had Party colleagues (almost 60 per cent of the received a strict Roman Catholic education and Socialist Parliamentarians are former teachers), up-bringing (Remember Arthur Augustus the FEN and CNAL. Hardly had the dust begun Calwell?) to settle, than the Minister, deploring the decline Mr. Mitterrands first Education Minister in educational standards, called for a return to faced the thankless task of seeking to honour "work, discipline and emulation". this election promise at a time when disillusion Whats more, action is scheduled to follow with the public school system was attaining new words — beginning at the root of the problem, heights and defenders of the private sector the primary school. As from the next school year (including large numbers with children in the (beginning in September 1985) the three Rs make public schools, but desirous of preserving freedom of choice) sensed the life or death a triumphant return and history instruction will nature of the looming struggle. These people, revert to its old methods based on chronology encouraged by the Lefts dwindling electoral and inculcation of dates (rather than themes). popularity in the face of the demonstrable Science is being elevated to a fully-fledged bankruptcy of its initial economic policy subject rather than accorded a mere prescriptions, organised what have been "stimulatory" role, and an education in civics is probably the largest popular demonstrations being introduced. Exams are coming back. ever witnessed in France, culminating in a march Interestingly enough, Mr. Chevenement is by around 1 1h million supporters in Paris in the son of a schoolteacher and a product of the June last year. The unfortunate Education elite ENA (Ecole Nationale dAdministration). Minister was disavowed by Mr. Mitterrand and For all his far-left pedigree, he has always resigned shortly before the President changed manifested a strong nationalist streak - Prime Ministers in July, 1984. appreciated by such political opponents as Mr. The new Minister, Mr. Jean-Pierre Debre (one of the General de Gaulles Prime Chevenement, is a man of impeccable socialist Ministers). His call for "Republican elitism" is credentials, a true darling of the Left. As leader doubtless more than glib talk and translates a of the left-wing CERES faction of the Socialist deep-felt conviction of the necessity for decisive Party, he has been instrumental in defending the action. His earlier stint as Industry Minister challenge to Mr. Mitterrands leadership of the surely brought home Frances need for highly- Socialist Party at its 1979 Congress and in qualified people -- scientists and managers — to forging the Programme Commun of the Union man the business and adminstrative apparatus if de la Gauche. He was a principal author of the the country is to survive and prosper in the 1981 "Project Socialiste" which, decrying the modern competitive world. Presumably, he has

32 WORK, DISCIPLINE AND EMULATION modified his former advocacy of a "fortress decision-making level and what is happening out France" with high frontier protection and in the field. The enormous educational competitive devaluation. apparatus (with its formidable built-in inertial What to make of all this? forces) which could not hope to pirouette with Pedagogics, like economics, is not a "hard" the Ministers agility evenif it wanted to, offers science and as such offers fertile ground for enormous possibility to sabotage the proponents of theories based heavily on political implementation of reforms. preconceptions and prejudices. The Minister will The high degree of administrative be obliged to walk a narrow tightrope and it centralisation in France has probably remains to be seen whether he is equally talented accentuated the weakness of linkages between in such acrobatics as in describing U-turns. He decision making and implementation. Careful has the full support of the President and Prime observers of the French scene are struck by the Minister, but powerful interests oppose his ideas; relatively limited impact which previous reforms the FEN has cried "betrayal" and many of his appear to have had at the classroom level. Their party colleagues castigate a return to the bad old application has been largely restricted to the days. Nevertheless, carrying the day on the problem areas (in the large industrial suburbs) political plane is only the first (and possibly where the need for innovation has been most easiest) step. It is necessary to distinguish keenly perceived. between jousting at the centralised political Plus ca change!

The Education Department has in all about 1.1 million people on the payroll and swallows about 18 per cent of the budget.

33 RESEARCH REPORT

Four Corners: The Pattern Of Bias Dr. Ken Baker

The Prime Minister, Mr. Hawke, has alleged "a pattern of bias" in parts of the ABC. Ken Baker examines a years output of Four Corners, the flagship of in-depth current affairs analysis on ABC TV, and assesses its content against the official ABC guidelines on balance and impartiality and the Prime Ministers allegation.

It would hardly be an overstatement to suggest that time: the ABC is facing major public relations problems. "Balance will be sought through the According to the Corporations own $100,000 self- presentation as far as possible of principal promotion campaign — involving full-page relevant viewpoints on matters of importance. advertisements run in major newspapers towards This requirement may not always be reached the end of last year — public criticism of the within a single program or news bulletin, but organisation has "reached a new pitch". And this will be achieved within a reasonable period". was prior to the launching of The National! My own research in 1983 ("Bias in the ABC", Ironically, the advertising campaign itself raised IPA Review, Winter, 1983), involving a survey of criticisms of an inappropriate use of public funds. sixty radio programmes over four months, was an Clearly, to the extent that public disillusionment attempt to address this question of systematic bias with the ABC is based on legitimate grievances, over an extended period. It concluded that the advertisements alone will not appease the critics section of ABC Radio concerned was indeed or restore public confidence and credibility to the politically unbalanced, having given recurrent organisation. airing to the concerns of the radical left while The key doubts surrounding the ABC relatively neglecting more moderate opinion. concern the question of whether the organisation The research reported below is an attempt to is adequately satisfying its charter on impartiality. apply fundamentally the same method of In April last year Prime Minister Hawke systematic analysis to examine the pattern of alleged `a pattern of bias .... apparent in parts of programming of "Four Corners", ABC TVs the ABC (reported in The Australian, April 13, leading programme of background news analysis. p.1). The question was legitimately raised and certainly warranted investigation. The Federal The Survey Oppositions attempts to divert the issue of bias to one of political interference was, in this context, The survey of Four Corners was conducted misguided. After all, allegations of bias in the from February to December 1984, and covered ABC have not been confined to politicians, or to forty programmes, the entire number televised over only one side of Parliament, as the quotations in this period. box 2 show. The method of analysis employed involved Yet while there are certainly numerous looking at two inter-related aspects of the documented cases of bias in particular ABC programmes: first, whether each programme gave programmes, the editorial guidelines on balance an equal hearing to each of the major sides of an endorsed by the ABC Board require only that issue; second, whether the topics featured favoured balance be achieved over a `reasonable period of the concerns of a particular political philosophy.

34 FOUR CORNERS

The assumption underlying this second aspect is that investment by overseas corporations brings that different philosophies tend to identify employment and higher living standards, the different issues as "problems" needing solution. radical left would more likely point to the threat A matter of concern to the proponents of one to national autonomy posed by foreign philosophy will often be of little interest to the investment. proponents of another. Each philosophy, in other "Using examples such as these, it can be words, generates its own `agenda. seen how the way in which `a problem is In the 1983 study, referred to above, I defined in the media becomes a way of elaborated on the nature of agendas in some detail: communicating one ideology rather than "For example, the concerns that another. There is obviously a major difference libertarians have with government regulation, between the media focussing on problems which and the inefficiences which they claim result call for government intervention in the market from interference with the workings of the (to protect the consumer from, say, false market place, are of little moment to those who advertising) and those which highlight the costs place small value on economic freedom. of government regulation (higher consumer "Foreign investment is another issue where prices). there are major divisions between political "In short, continual reference to the philosophies. While libertarians might argue concerns of one particular political agenda can

1: An Absolutely Dreadful Year

The Managing Director of the ABC, Geoffrey "inadequate" and "unbalanced" and that interviews Whitehead, reportedly spoke of 1984 as "absolutely a with senior Thai officials had been severely edited dreadful year" — a lament not without cause. Last year because their "views contradicted those of the makers saw the ABC become increasingly a source of public of the documentary". controversy rather than a presenter and analyst of • In May, an out-of-court settlement for an undisclosed controversy. It is worth briefly recalling some of the sum was made between a Four Corners reporter and highlights: the N.SW. Premier, Neville Wran, engaged in • In March 1984, Western Mining Corporation proceedings against the ABC. successfully sued the ABC for libel, eliciting an • In July 1984, the ABCs news service fell silent admission that allegations made on a Nationwide because of a strike conducted by the ABC Staff (SA) programme that the mining company had Association in protest against a decision made by desecrated an Aboriginal sacred site at Roxby Downs management to appoint Ralph Neale as Chief were without foundation. Television Newsreader. • In April occurred the dispute over whether Four Corners was to be permitted to broadcast a • At about the same time, the ABC announced the controversial interview with the leader of the Free extension of spouse benefits to the de facto partners Papua Movement, against the wishes of the PNG of homosexual staff members, thus earning the Government and, perhaps more importantly, against epithet "Gay BC: The move to extend benefits the wishes of the ABC Chairman, Ken Myer. The reflected considerable disregard for the need to dispute raised questions about press freedom, about restrain additional expenditure on fringe benefits for the responsibility to the national interest of staff, as well as insensitivity to the values of the wider journalists reporting in sensitive areas overseas, and community. about editorial control in the ABC, including who • Within two months of the years close, Comalco was actually runs the organisation. The Board, reportedly awarded damages of $295,000 plus costs over a Four under pressure from a campaign conducted by staff Corners programme, ruled to be libellous, on the on the ABCs own current affairs programmes, relationship between the mining company and the overturned the decision to stop the interview going to Aboriginal Community at Weipa. air and the interview was shown. Needless to say, every time the ABC is successfully • Only six months earlier, in November 1983, the sued for its failure to ensure that material put to air is Government of Thailand complained that a Four accurate and balanced, it is the taxpayer who must meet Corners report on Kampuchea was grossly the bill.

35 FOUR CORNERS

serve as a powerful strategy for changing tougher penalties for lawbreakers and Israels right community outlooks"! to exist. In this article, for the sake of simplicity, I shall deal with two general political agendas: that of the The Findings radical left and that of, what might be called, liberal- conservatism, combining a moderate form of Of the forty Four Corners programmes economic libertarianism with a mild social and monitored in the survey nineteen fell within the moral conservatism. radical left agenda. By comparison only three fell The former position, that of the radical left, within the liberal-conservative agenda: March 10 favours an increase in economic regulation, an anti- on the entry of foreign banks into Australia, traditional approach to moral issues and an anti- September 15 on the bureaucratic inefficiency of the American stand on foreign policy. It supports Department of Aviations rescue procedure and July increased government intervention in the lives of 7 on medifraud and bureaucratic ineptitude in the people to redistribute resources in the name of Department of Health despite its failure greater equality of outcome and more State welfare. to raise the economic libertarian argument that a Supporters of this philosophy will tend to focus on strong link exists between government involvement issues which highlight their views about the risks of in universal health schemes and incentives to uranium mining and nuclear power, the need for a defraud. (See "Doctors Who Cheat" by Dr. Peter Bill of Rights, the shortage of public housing, the Arnold, IPA Review, Autumn 1983). The remaining exploitation of the third world by multinational programmes were concerned with issues which did corporations, the need to sever ties with Britain, the not fall within either of these agendas. For example, dangers of American bases and the U.S. alliance in October 27 on the Costigan Commission gave an making Australia a nuclear target, the importance equal hearing to civil libertarian arguments against of land rights in compensating Aborigines for their the powers of the Commission and law and order unjust treatment at the hands of white Australia, the arguments about its role in curbing crime. June 9 on unscrupulous power exerted by business pornography failed to canvass the objections of corporations, Israeli aggression and the threat moral conservatives, but did nevertheless present a posed by Reagans America to the integrity of case for banning x-rated videos through the views socialist countries, particularly in Central America. of radical feminists. Several topics had no obvious connection with any political agenda. These included the plight of One theme is the antagonistic attitude brain-damaged car accident victims (September 22), displayed to America, presented as a society Olympic training at the Australian Institute of Sport stricken by poverty, violence and social (April 28), the questionable use of forensic evidence injustice. in legal trials (April 24) and art fraud (October 6).

By contrast, liberal-conservatism favours Reagans America leaner government and Iess regulation of the economy, defends traditional values and social A number of recurrent themes emerge from the institutions and supports a strong Western military nineteen programmes which were biased to the left. alliance as a deterrent to war. Adherents to this One is the antagonistic attitude displayed to philosophy will tend to focus on issues which America and particularly to President Reagan. The highlight matters such as the growth and features of the U.S.A. selected for coverage tended inefficiency of the public sector, the excessive power to present the society as one stricken by poverty, of trade unions, the role of the arbitration system violence and social injustice. It was seen as pursuing in keeping young people unemployed, Soviet a foreign policy which involved illicitly intruding in imperialism and the massive Soviet arms build-up the affairs of Central America (October 13) and in the last decade, declining standards and discipline bullying a small island in the South Pacific to in schools, threats to the nuclear family, the advance its own military goals (December 8). importance of ANZUS to Australias defence, Of six programmes relating to America five

Ken Baker, "Bias in the ABC: IPA REVIEW, Winter 1983.

36 2: Allegations of Bias

The editorial guidelines published by the ABC Board last far more genuinely responsive to the wishes of the public year state in part: than they are present.... The ABC, if it were to be a viable "The ABC has a statutory duty to inform its commercial organisation, would have to change its ways Australian and overseas audience of important news drastically, perhaps spending more of its funds on and relevant issues around the world. This obligation production, and less on Byzantine administration. It requires of its staff journalists the highest might even be able to get ratings with quality news, public professional standards of accuracy, impartiality and affairs, information, and cultural output. But it would • fairness. In pursuing the Corporations objectives to have a much harder time peddling low grade inform, ABC journalists will not allow their propaganda". professional judgment to be influenced by pressure Max Harris in a scathing article in The Australian from political, commercial or other sectional (May 4, 1985) has also joined the chorus of voices critical interests, or their own personal views". of left-wing bias in the ABC: "The ABC", state the guidelines, "takes no "The lasting malignancy of the ABC is the bias, editorial stand in its programming". bigotry, ignorance, and plain disbalance of the Concern that the ABC is failing in its charter to be general talks and social discussion programs. The impartial and balanced is hardly new. The Dix Inquiry ominipresence of raw and under-educated voices into the ABC stated in its 1981 report: "We are sounding off with leftist-trendy-Trotskyite views on unimpressed by arguments that programmes giving anything and everything, is not to be found in any prominence to committed left-leaning views .... are public service broadcasting anywhere in the world balanced by others produced in other areas". (10.24) (outside the totalitarian countries). Even the Deputy Chairman of the ABC, Wendy Radical ratbaggery, especially from semi-literate McCarthy, in an interview published in the National academics, runs riot on ABC radio, theres no attempt Times (January 13-19, 1984, p. 8) acknowledged the to reflect community values by pursuing the existence of a "reformist" bias in the ABC, although she counterbalance which would give objectivity to argues that it is "confined to a very few departments". presentations of controversial themes. Given that only a few departments are involved with Its a hangover, many of us believe, from the current affairs, this is hardly reassuring. invasion of the ABC by fixated young radicals of no In an interview with Mike Broadhurst on ABC great brain during the free-wheeling Whitlam radio, Mr. Hawke repeated his charge of a pattern of bias seventies. when pressed repeatedly about uranium mining and These bodies are now part of the ABC furniture, peace marches: "If you want to keep arguing the anti- screwed to the floor, despite the fact that the times uranium case and implications of marching — do so and they have a-changed. Reason is in. Ranting radicalism it will be another example of the way in which on this is about as relevant to our less emotional heads as the programme, this institution is going to push a particular hula hoop is in the playground. line". (reported in The Age, April 27, 1984) The ABC top brass know this, but theres not Clement Semmler, former Deputy General much they can do about getting rid of the middle-level Manager of the ABC, writing at the end of 1983, also detritus. At least, they believe there isnt! pointed to "the existence of Left-wing bias in the ABC What can be done wont be done until we cease and its divisive effects on the broadcasting audience". He nit-picking over the poor old unassuming continues .. ...the idea that a public broadcasting "National", boring as it may be, and continue to organisation should attempt, so often with glib and squawk for socio-political balance, balance, less half- shallow presentations, to form public opinion in a baked lefty unalloyed bias, balance, balance, and certain direction, should be anathema to anyone balance again". concerned with igtellectual values in our community". Media critic, Anthony McAdam, has documented On Sunday March 17, The National led with a story numerous examples of Left-wing bias in ABC current that the very next day the U.S.A. was going to test-fire a affairs, part of what he sees as a "seemingly concerted MX missile which would splash down off the coast of campaign of ABC programme makers .... Tasmania. The source of the report was a protestor fundamentally to alter the value system of our political demonstrating against the visit of two U.S. Navy ships culture". to Brisbane. Quite obviously the report was wrong, but B.A. Santamaria has also been a regular and no apology or explanation was forthcoming on consistent critic of the ABC: following nights. As David Solomon, The Financial "Since it is financed exclusively by public money, Reviews media critic, concluded: "Once upon a time, the the ABC ought not belong to any political party or fact that the ABC ran a particular news item meant that to any intellectual current whether of left or right, it was almost certainly correct. That sort of standard no feminist, homosexual, lesbian or traditionalist. It longer appears to matter". should not serve as the propaganda voice for any The Financial Review (March 13, 1985) has opinion. In fact, it does ... With few exceptions, the editorialised in favour of privatising the ABC on the public affairs programs of the ABC emerge as grounds that "it could well make the ABC management extreme left-wing ..".

37 FOUR CORNERS

portrayed the record and aims of the Reagan the detriment of their economic and physical well- Administration in a predominantly negative light. being. No Four Corners programme dealt with the Reagan was described in terms such as a "gun toting, benefits of foreign investment and Western swaggering cowboy" (April 7) and a President technology to the third world and/or the extent to whose speeches, when it comes to women, always which third world development has been stultified contain a patronising attitude, a "caveman joke" or by indigenous governments hostile to free a "Freudian slip" (May 1). enterprise. Fathers Gore and OBrien (June 30 — It is notable that "The Gender Gap" (May 19) "This Turbulent Priest") advocated a form of non- in confusing the views of radical feminists, such as violent liberation theology in the name of achieving Bella Abzug and Betty Friedan, with the views of a more equitable and just society in the Philippines. American women, failed dismally to account for But in none of the programmes dealing with why, in the end, the majority of developing countries was any attempt made to American women who voted, actually voted for account for the high average annual growth rates Reagan. (per capita GDP) in predominantly free enterprise In many peoples eyes Reagans re-election with developing economies such as Hong Kong (6.9%), overwhelming support in November, 1984, reflected Sth. Korea (8.1%), Singapore (6.6%), in significant achievements in his first term. In foreign comparison with authoritarian economies such as affairs, Reagan is widely thought to have made Angola (-10.5%), Mozambique (-5.5%) and Libya important steps towards restoring credibility and (-2.6%) for example. (May 5 on poverty in Upper authority to the American Presidency. Many also Volta made no mention of the fact that the countrys point to the economic recovery under Reagan — the economic development is restricted by a socialist reduction of the inflation rate from 11.9 per cent in military dictatorship.) 1981 to 4.1 per cent in 1984, the creation of a massive "Buy Now, Pay Forever" (August 11) consisted seven million jobs (overwhelmingly in the private of case studies of bad debtors, depicted as the sector) in the twenty-five months to February 1985 victims of unscrupulous finance companies. It and the achievement of an economic growth rate failed to give equal attention to the view that finance currently running at 4 per cent — although the companies provide a service to consumers (allowing deficit remains a major problem. Four Corners, them to purchase goods they would otherwise be however, managed to largely overlook these forced to do without) and that responsibility for achievements. As such, were its viewers to have ones debts is a necessary condition of economic depended upon it for their conceptions of the freedom. The tendency of Four Corners was to United States today, they would have been staggered blame the system for the plight of the individual (the by the Presidential election outcome. bad debtor), rather than treating the individual as responsible for the debts he incurs. Free Enterprise

Five programmes looked at issues relating to The impression is left that the main impact the operation of the free market. Only one of these of multinationals on third world nations — (March 10) on moves to allow foreign banks into has been to the detriment of their economic Australia — focussed on the potential benefits to and physical well -being. consumers of economic deregulation. The other four examined business enterprises in the context of the exploitation or deception of consumers, and, Overall, by their presentation of consumers as implicitly or explicitly, advocated greater victims, these programmes failed to reasonably government regulation of business. consider the view that the free market actually "The Pillbox Profiteers" exposed the empowers consumers, by providing them with marketing of dangerous drugs in the third world by competitive choices — a blind spot perhaps Western multinationals in pursuit of high profits at aggravated by the ABCs own position outside the the expense of peoples welfare. The programme gave market. Nor was it adequately suggested that support to the banning of fifty per cent of available "consumer protection" in the form of government drugs by Bangladeshs military government. The regulations can often serve to increase costs to impression is left that the main impact of consumers and create disincentives to invent and multinationals on third world nations has been to market new products.

38 3: The Problem of Accountability

At the heart of much of the controversy surrounding the consistent with the ABC Staff Associations ABC is the issue of accountability, of how an commitment to "workers control". organisation which absorbs annually around $400 The point is reinforced by media critic, Anthony million of taxpayers money — excluding transmission McAdams comment: costs — can be made to better serve the interests of the "The real power in the ABC today resides not public who fund it. The issue of accountability, in terms with Mr. Whitehead (the Managing Director) and particularly of editorial responsibility, but also of cost least of all with Mr. Myer (the Chairman of the control, is acentral problem facing the ABC. A number Board), but with a small group of highly motivated of factors have aggravated this problem: program-makers who were radicalised on the • The decision by the Federal Labor Government soon campuses during the Vietnam years ... (Melbourne after winning power in 1983 to dump plans to appoint Herald, September 14). an independent ABC Commissioner whose function Ken Inglis anecdote in his history of the it would have been to investigate complaints from the Commission, This is the ABC, is also of relevance. He public. reports a case where the acting General Manager, • The growing autonomy and power of ABC staff (and complaining to the Controller of Programmes that declining authority of management) in editorial matters, now institutionalised in the official charter he should have been informed about the broadcasting of editorial practice published by the ABC Board of a politically controversial item, was told by the which states in part "Authority for editorial directions Controller that "reporters were uncontrollable: and decisions will be vested in editorial staff". As As the recent history of The National illustrates, the David Solomon, in the Financial Review, has written: ABC operates without those checks on spending "Taken literally, that injunction would prevent ABC which would be imposed by the market place. Such management, or the ABC Board, from exercising a situation tends to increase the indifference of the authority over sensitive programme matters. This is organisation to the values of the wider community, no doubt what the programme-makers want, and as well as to generate attitudes such as that reported represents an extraordinary surrender of power from in the Comalco case, mentioned in Box 1 in which an the top of the ABC". Acting Director of Public Affairs at the ABC, when This charter, while endorsed by the ABC Board, told that a Four Corners programme to be broadcast was initiated by Australian Journalists Association. was probably defamatory, replied: "If you do not like The particular injunction cited above is, moreover, the programme, you can sue us on Monday morning".

4: The Pattern Continues

Four Corners in 1985 has adopted a longer format and the subject? His critics say theres plenty of evidence is televised at a new time. There is, however, no indication that he lacks the grasp, like the incident last year when that the ideology of Four Corners has changed. he appeared unable to answer a simple question like A sample of the "new look" Four Corners is what are you doing about the arms talks, without contained in the following excerpts from the March 12 prompting from Nancy" programme on the arms race. The statements are by Four On the American view of the world: Corners presenters and reporters. "All the eight post-war presidents have presented On Reagans intentions and competence on arms the world to Americans as them and us. America is control: always the good guy, Russias always the bad guy. "Ronald Reagan gives cause for concern at two levels. Firstly, hes been an aggressive and vehement Even in detente, the image wasnt lost. But the eighth critic of the Soviet Union for most of his political life. President for the whole of his first term, was He once inferred it was a mistake to think of Russians surrounded by the toughest coterie of anti-Soviet as people. Can a man of his record really bring hardliners ever to grace the White House ... more himself to seek common ground for agreement that important than all of them was the third-level doesnt make the Russians eat dirt?.... Secondly... Pentagon bureaucrat named Richard Perle, dubbed does he have the intellectual capacity to understand by one of his critics as the prince of darkness".

39 FOUR CORNERS

The scope for topics dealing with the costs to treated as at best marginal in Four Corners consumers of government regulation in Australia is interpretation of international relations. This view, considerable: the Two Airline policy; the simply stated, is that government communications monopolies, • the chief threat of nuclear war falls squarely with Australia Post and Telecom; the inhibition of the expansionary ambitions of the Soviet Union mining activity by land rights legislation etc. But and her client states; such topics, it seems, fell outside Four Corners • Reagans programme to strengthen Americas narrow agenda. defences has contributed to the stabilisation of Finally, against these programmes dealing with international relations and brought Russia to the business abuse of power, only one programme disarmament negotiating table. Similarly, (August 25) purported to raise the question of union Western Alliances, such as NATO and ANZUS, power. Yet even here the weight of the report — on are crucial if a credible deterrent to war is to exist; the miners strike in Britain --- suggested that a • the so-called Western cold war warriors who greater threat to democratic freedoms than the portray Soviet communism as an inhuman, exercise of union power was the extension of police oppressive and evil system are not guilty of powers by Mrs. Thatchers Government. Virtually "negative stereotyping", but are describing no analysis was undertaken of Arthur ScargiIls reality. totalitarian sympathies — his former Communist Perhaps the programme that best encapsulated Party affiliations, his public condemnations of the anti-American, anti-nuclear thrust of Four Solidarity and of attempts to form a free miners Corners was "Paradise Lost" (December 8). It union in the Soviet Union, his soliciting of financial combined criticism of U.S. "cultural imperialism" support from both Moscow and the terrorist regime in the third world for its destruction of an of Libyas Colonel Gadaffi. indigenous culture, an expose of bullying and manipulative tactics employed by the U.S. to Nuclear Arms advance its own military goals and promotion of a nuclear free Pacific. As the title of the programme Of the four programmes which looked at suggests, America is portrayed as the bearer of various aspects of the nuclear arms issue none original sin corrupting the primitive garden presented the arguments in a balanced way. The paradise. one-hour special, "Uranium: Handle with Care" By contrast no programmes dealt with Soviet presented a case that the existing strict safeguards missile tests in the Pacific (reportedly 24 since 1978) on uranium exports are ineffective, a case or Soviet and Cuban influence in Central America. overwhelmingly in opposition to the policies of the Indeed the only threat which John Pilgers report present Government (and the Opposition). It thus on Nicaragua (October 13) revealed was the argued, implicitly, for the cessation of uranium American threat. Reports of the Sandinistas mining. Senator Walsh, then Minister for Resources violations of human rights, restriction of press and Energy, said in Parliament of this programme freedom and the severe economic problems faced by that it failed to make any "real effort to inform socialist Nicaragua were not analysed (cf. Freedom viewers of exactly what safeguards techniques at Issue, Jan — Feb, 1984; May — June, 1984; involve and to explain the objectives and goals of Encounter Dec., 1983). safeguards measures" (Senate Hansard, 4 May One programme focussed on Israel. "The 1984). Merchant of Menace" (September 8) (note the In "Eagles in the Bears Den" (July 21) — a association with Shakespeares anti-semitic play) one-hour special — the threat of nuclear war was consisted of a profile of a Jewish "fascist", an ardent presented as a consequence of irrational mistrust Zionist, Rabbi Kahane, who was elected last year to and misunderstanding between Russia and America Israels Parliament. There is no evidence that generated by Cold War warriors on both sides. Each Kahanes election was indicative of a general shift side is accused of dehumanising and negatively to the Right in the Israeli Parliament, yet links were stereotyping the other. The implicit suggestion is made in the programme to the rise of Hitler in that both Russia and America are equally culpable Germany in the 1930s. Given that Israel is for the state of international tensions. exceptional in the Middle-East in the relative The mainstream view — held by all Western stability and democratic nature of its political Governments except perhaps New Zealand — was system it seems a distortion for the only Four

40 FOUR CORNERS

Corners programme of the year on Israel to choose introduce a greater degree of accountability in the to focus on a marginal, unrepresentative "fascist". ABC as a whole and to resolve the apparent lack of The underlying message of the programme, that leadership in the organisation, both at the Board Zionism equals fascism, is a familiar leftist theme. level and at all levels of management (see box 3). The two programmes on Aboriginal Land There are a number of steps which could be rights (April 21 and November 17) also taken immediately: demonstrated a selective focus. "Riches Beyond • The ABCs charter on impartiality and balance Dreaming" (April 21), the worse of the two is unambiguous. The ABC Board should take programmes, editorialised in favour of stronger tougher measures to enforce it. It is not as if ABC legislation to protect Aboriginal sacred sites against management is not capable of acting swiftly in the rapacious activities of mining companies. Peter response to allegations of bias when it wants to. Ross, the reporter, argued that the Heritage Bill Apparently a single complaint was sufficient to would place Aboriginal land under just the same close down the weekly radio broadcast by protection as is afforded to European land. This economic dry, John Hyde, on the ABC in plainly misses the whole debate about the principles Western Australia (reported in the W.A. Times, of land rights legislation which would place November 25, 1984). Surely the production of Aboriginal land under special conditions, including systematic evidence, as distinct from a mere inalienable freehold title, a title granted to no other complaint, of left-wing bias should elicit at least land in Australia. as rapid a response. Finally, just as the Gender Gap (May 19) • Ultimate authority for editorial practice must be confused the views of radical feminists with the removed from programme-makers and given to views of American women, so "No Power No the ABC Board. This is a point made very Passion" (November 24) confused the interests of effectively by David Solomon in his column in young people with the concerns of radical political The Australian Financial Review (see box 3). The activists (including Socialist Left member, Pete current arrangements have allowed journalists to Steedman, NDP candidate, Peter Garrett, and push their own ideological barrows free from various socialist coalitions). While Steedman was considerations of accountability. presented as having lobbied hard for the rights of • The Board should recognise, as do leading the young unemployed, no attempt was made to newspapers, that the way an issue is reported and deal with the libertarian position, widely held, that analysed typically reflects the journalists values. one answer to youth unemployment lies in The issues important to a left-wing journalist and deregulating youth wages (The adverse effect on the way in which they are reported differ from the youth employment of the relatively high level of issues important to a journalist who holds more youth wages was a central finding of the Bureau of conservative values. It is thus imperative, if the Labour Market Researchs Report, Youth Wages, ABC is to allow a wider spectrum of topics and Employment and the Labour Force, 1983). views to be represented in its current affairs programmes, that the organisation appoint Solutions journalists who are outside the prevailing left- wing consensus. The pattern of bias documented above is a • The Board should seriously consider establishing recurring feature of Four Corners and, as such, a current affairs programme which explicitly plainly a violation of the ABCs official guidelines reflects economically libertarian and socially on impartiality and balance. The evidence strongly conservative views at present largely excluded suggests that the Prime Minister was justified, at from its airwaves. least in regard to Four Corners, in stating that ABC • The Minister for Communications should have programmes revealed "a pattern of bias". My own a report prepared assessing whether the ABC has earlier study of a section of the output of ABC responded to the findings of the Dix Report Radio as well as the numerous instances of bias concerning the left-wing bias of a number of alleged and documented by others suggest that ABC programmes and recommending that a current affairs bias in the ABC is very likely more wider range of views be aired. widespread than that apparent in Four Corners. • A monitoring committee was established during How is the problem of bias to be solved? Any the last election campaign with the aim of solution must necessarily involve measures to ensuring balance on the ABC. A similar

41 FOUR CORNERS

independent body should be permanently approaching the point where tinkering with the established to monitor the ABCs output. organisation will no longer suffice and a more The Government should also clarify the drastic solution is required. relationship that should exist between the ABC In the long term, the government of the day and community values. The present confusion is must assess whether it is in the public interest for the well illustrated by the claim in the recent ABC ABC to remain in the public sector. Problems of advertisements that a central goal of the accountability — relating to administration, organisation is to contribute to "the development industrial relations and output — are endemic to of values within the community". As Barry Hill public sector organisations. in The Age has asked, exactly which particular The Financial Review (March 13, 1985) has values does the ABC intend to "develop"? While editorialised in favour of selling off the ABC. This it is not the ABCs role to reflect popular tastes is a suggestion with considerable merit. It would in the Arts or the sensationalism of popular lighten the tax burden and stimulate greater tabloids, neither does it have a charter to efficiency in the organisation. And it would help radicalise the community. It would be absurd to curb the self-indulgence of an organisation too suggest that serious and challenging journalism much of whose programming seems to be directed need be left-wing. towards satisfying the preoccupations and It is the Federal Government which has ultimate sympathies of an unrepresentative group of responsibility for the ABC and is charged with reporters and programmers. the duty to represent citizens and taxpayers whose Unless the ABC is prepared to display less money funds the ABC. The Governments first contempt for the values of the community who attempt to reform the organisation, in the finances it, it is hard to see how it can continue to opinion of people as far apart on the political justify taking around $400 million per annum of spectrum as Phillip Adams and Anthony public money. McAdam, has failed. Matters are rapidly

CENTRE FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION Aims and purposes: • help students from primary school upwards understand the economic world in which they live • provide needed resources for busy teachers • expand the social insights of teachers and students • review, monitor and publish resources in areas of economic education • bring gifted communicators on economic education from overseas to work with teachers and students. Enquiries should be directed to: The Director, CEE, P.O. Box 334, Albert Park, 3206.

42 FOCUS ON FIGURES

Jacob Abrahami The Trilogy

The May mini-budget and the Premiers burden, as measured by the share of Conference suggests that the Commonwealth Commonwealth Government tax revenue in gross Government is determined to achieve its trilogy domestic product, next year or through the of election promises on government spending, Governments next term of office". taxes and borrowing. But how exacting are these promises? Deficit The three elements of the trilogy are: • In 1985/86 the deficit will be further reduced, Expenditure not only as a share of GDP but also in money terms. In the subsequent two years the deficit • "The growth in outlays will be held within the will not be increased as a share of GDP". rate of growth of the economy as a whole". One way to assess the task that Mr. Hawke has set himself is to look at the record of previous Taxation Prime Ministers in relation to the trilogy. The table below enables us to compare performances. "There must be no increase in the overall tax

THE TRILOGY: 1953/54 TO 1984/85 Govt. Govt. GDP Outlays Taxes Deficit GDP Outlays Taxes Deficit % % % %of % % %a %of Increase Increase Increase GDP Increase Increase Increase GDP Menzies McMahon 1953/54 9.3 -5.7 0.6 1.6 1971/72 11.7 11.6 9.9 0.4 1954/55 6.5 3.3 4.1 1.1 1972/73 13.8 12.6 6.5 1.7 1955/56 8.4 9.3 6.9 1.5 1956/57 8.9 4.8 9.6 0.4 Whitlam 1957/58 11.3 6.4 5.7 0.4 1973/74 19.7 20.0 28.6 0.6 1958/59 7.5 7.6 -2.4 2.2 1974/75 20.2 45.7 29.5 4.2 1959/60 10.3 8.7 10.2 1.7 1975/76 17.9 22.5 19.6 4.9 1960/61 6.3 5.7 14.0 0.2 1961/62 2.4 11.8 -0.6 2.4 Fraser 1962/63 8.1 4.1 1.7 2.6 1976/77 14.2 10.4 16.6 3.3 1963/64 11.1 9.9 11.7 2.3 1977/78 8.5 10.9 8.7 3.7 1964/65 10.0 9.3 19.1 0.9 1978/79 13.1 8.5 9.1 3.4 1965/66 5.1 11.0 9.8 1.2 1979/80 12.1 9.1 17.2 1.8 Holt 1980/81 15.4 14.1 18.9 0.9 1966/67 15.7 12.1 6.6 2.4 1981/82 13.0 14.4 16.4 0.7 1967/68 6.7 10.4 10.4 2.6 1982/83 9.6 18.5 8.1 2.7 Gorton 1968/69 12.9 6.2 11.7 1.4 Hawke 1969/70 10.8 11.1 15.5 0.6 1983/84 13.4 15.6 9.0 4.3 1970/71 10.5 10.3 13.0 0.0 1984/85 11.0 13.0 17.9 3.2

43 FOCUS ON FIGURES

The left-hand column shows the annual Even after adjusting for the impact of the percentage growth of the economy (measured in introduction of Medicare, the increase in the public GDP in money terms). The next two columns sectors contribution to the CPI was substantially show the growth of Commonwealth Government higher than that of the private sector. spending and taxes respectively (also measured in Public and Private Sector Contribution money terms). Where these two elements grow at to the CPI less than the economy we can say the targets in (Percentage increase March Qtr 1984 those two areas have clearly been kept. The right to March Qtr 1985) hand column looks at the third promise — to All Items After Medicare reduce the share of the deficit. Adjustment Mr. Hawkes major promise relates to Private Sector Index 3.9 5.1 expenditure. A cut back in government outlays, Public Sector Index 6.0 6.6 as the table shows is always accompanied by a Total CPI 4.4 5.5 reduction either in taxes or the deficit or both (as Since March 1982 public sector inflation has a proportion of GDP). Outlays in short determine amounted to 32.5 per cent compared with 23.8 per the other two variables. cent in the private sector. Some 18 budgets over the last 32 years have grown by less than the economy. In every one of the 18 years in which Federal Cutting the Size of Government outlays expanded less rapidly than GDP so did taxes or the deficit; in five of the years Government both taxes and the deficit diminished as a Although the objective of cutting the size of proportion of GDP. government is supported by both major political Thus, it has to be said, restraining government parties, an overiding air of pessimism prevails. The expenditure to within the growth rate of the main obstacle appears to be the belief by many economy as a whole is a rather modest -- particularly politicians — that the task is too achievement — at least in the context of it being difficult and because of past mistakes we are now achieved more often than not in the past 32 years. stuck with big government. In more recent times — the past twelve years In fact however, an examination of the figures of government under Whitlam, Fraser and Hawke suggests that the task of reducing the size of — success in achieving government restraint has government is well within our capabilities. been more elusive. On only four occasions, all of If the growth of government outlays could them during the life of the Fraser Government, be held to around 2 per cent per annum then, was the growth rate of Commonwealth assuming the economy expands at levels similar government outlays less than the growth of GDP. to the last twenty years, the share of government in GDP in the year 2000 would drop from the current level of around 43 per cent to 32 per cent. Governments are fuelling If, however, government outlays in real terms inflation follow the trend of the last twenty years (5.7 per cent per annum) then outlays will absorb some 55 Public sector inflation is rising at significantly per cent of the nations product. faster rates than inflation in the private sector. These figures illustrate an important principle Unless the government is prepared to exercise in the whole debate about cutting the size of tight fiscal and monetary discipline, Australia may government. There is no need for major well be heading towards double digit inflation in programmes to be cut (although undoubtedly twelve months time. many should) as the 2 per cent growth rate would The public sectors direct contribution to the enable government to maintain current increase in the CPI in the past twelve months was programmes. one and a half times that of the private sector — However, this figure would not allow new 6.0 per cent against 3.9 per cent. programmes to be added without offsetting

Readers who wish to read further on the IPA inflation index are referred to IPA Review Spring 1983 (page 120).

44 Debate IPA POLICY ISSUES No. 1. The Land Rights publications to "The Land Right Debate: Selected Documents" topicalis area of debate.a lance in this contentious and highly top support for Aboriginal achieveIt canvasses b the full spectrum of opinion from Rob Rileys supp to al statement ement of the from for Aboriginal Affairs, ClydedeHoldHoldings legitimac pin the Minister g Member for Kalgoorlie Graeme rights legislatio s Own party. bellbells protes itoh a Cp amampt :In apparent in the POLICY ISSUES No., 2, Cutting the Size of Government are key issues. This study prepared by tion of some years g Taxation,Jacob Abrahami, the deficit, IPA governmentSenior Economist, spendin provides the basic data on the problems Ies. and costs of big government.

IPA POLICY ISSUES ORDER FORM No. 1, The Land Rights Debate ... copses off PolicyPolic Issues ^seCtoremployees em to ees Please forward includes 50c postage and handling per. copy) copy, this ved government (cost $3.50 per copies of Policy Issues No. 2, Cutting the Size of f a wage or a forward .d • • • • his year the ratio PleaseGovernment (cost $3.50 per copy, this includes 50c postage and handling + recepient of a per copy). ^ private sector Total Payment $......

II NAME (BLOCK LETTERS) 1985(e)

ADDRESS POSTCODE

II

PAYMENT OPTIONS enclose my cheque for $.... made payable to the Institute of Public Affairs q I Expiry Date ...... q Please. charge my bankcard Cardholders Signature b 4 9 6 m ___r.....,^^tz:2S 80.5

Total Welfare beneficaries 1071.6 3256.5

No of persons in receipt of welfare per 100 private sector employees 26 66

Government Employees 1027.3 1663.3

No of government employees per 100 private sector employees 25 34

Total Recipients of Income from Government 2098.9 4919.8

Private Sector Employees 4132.6 4930.7

No of persons in receipt of govt. income per 100 private sector employees 51 100

Employees of Federal, State and Local governments and their Authorities.

45 1

HISTORICAL DOCUMENT

John Curtin and the American Alliance

Dhn Curtin, rime Minister of Australia, 94I-1945

The Prime Minister, Mr. Hawke, has identified former Labor Prime Minister, John Curtin, as his model for a national leader. In 1941, John Curtin changed the course of Australian history by his historic appeal to the United States to come to Australias aid in its hour of need. Since then the American alliance has been the foundation of Australias security arrangements. Key aspects of the speech remain particularly pertinent today. One is Curtins castigation of the Allied nations for their lack of preparedness in the period leading up to the War. Another is the importance of traditions and symbols, such as the Anzacs and the Flag, in uniting a nation. A third aspect is the continuing bipartisan support for the American alliance, despite attempts by the far left to undermine it. Also notable is the strong sense of communal purpose and the self-sacrifice of Australians elicited by an external threat to the nation. Here we reprint an extract from John Curtins inspiring address to the American people delivered at a critical moment in our national history.

Men and women of the United States, I speak to war and tell you a little of Australia and you from Australia. I speak from a united people Australians. I am not speaking to your to a united people, and my speech is aimed to Government. We have long been admirers of Mr. serve all the people of the nations united in the Roosevelt and have the greatest confidence that struggle to save mankind. he understands fully the critical situation in the On the great waters of the Pacific Ocean Pacific, and that America will go right out to war now breathes its bloody steam. From the meet it. For all that America has done, both skies of the Pacific pours down a deathly hail on before and after entering the war, we have the countless islands of the Pacific. The tide of war greatest admiration and gratitude. flows badly for you in America. For us in It is to the people of America I am now Australia it is flowing badly. speaking, to you who are or will be fighting, to Let me then address you as comrades in this you who are s weating in factories and workshops

46 JOHN CURTIN to turn out the vital munitions of war, to all of regret to us that even now, after ninety-five days you who are making sacrifices in one way or of Japans staggering advance south — ever another to provide the enormous resources south — that we have not obtained firsthand required for our great task... contact with America. But facts are stern things. We, the Allied Therefore we propose sending to you our nations, were unready and Japan, behind her Minister for External Affairs, Dr. H. V. Evatt, wall of secrecy, had prepared for war on a scale who is no stranger to your country, so that we of which neither we nor you had any knowledge. may benefit from his discussions with your It was therefore but natural that within twenty authorities. Dr. Evatt s wife, who will days after Japans first treacherous blow I said accompany him, was born in the United States. on behalf of the Australian Government that we Dr. Evatt will notgo to you as a mendicant. looked to America as the paramount factor on He will go to you as the respresentative of a the democracies side in the Pacific. people as firmly determined to hold and hit back There is no belittling of the Old Country in at the enemy as courageously as those people this outlook. Britain has fought and won in the from whose loins we spring, those people who tremendous Battle of Britain. Britain has fought withstood the disaster of Dunkirk, the fury of and with your strong help has won the equally Goerings blitz, the shattering blows of the vital Battle of the Atlantic. She had a paramount Battle of the Atlantic. He will go to tell you that obligation to supply all possible help to Russia. we are fighting mad, that our people have a She cannot, at the same time, go all out in the Government that is governing with order and not Pacific. We, with New Zealand, represent Great with weak-kneed suggestions; that we Britain here in the Pacific — we are her sons - Australians are a people who, whilst somewhat and on us the responsibility falls. I pledge you inexperienced and uncertain as to what war on my word: We will not fail. We will pull knee to their own soil may mean, are nevertheless ready knee with you every ounce of our weight. for anything, and will trade punches, giving odds We have all made mistakes. We have all been if need be, until we rock the enemy back on his too slow. We have all shown weakness, all the heels. Allied Nations. This is not the time to wrangle We are, then, committed heart and soul to about who has been most to blame. Now our total warfare. How far, you may ask me, have we eyes are open. The Australian Government has progressed along that road? fought for its people. We never regarded the I may answer you this way. Out of every ten Pacific as a segment of the great struggle. We did men in Australia four are now wholly engaged in not insist that it was the primary theatre of war. But we did say, and events have unhappily war, as members of the fighting forces or making proved us right, that the loss of the Pacific can the munitions and equipment needed to fight. The other six, besides feeding and clothing the be disastrous. Who among us, contemplating the future whole ten and their families, have to provide the on that day in December last when Japan struck food and wool and meals which Britain needs for like an assassin at Pearl Harbour, at Manila, at her very existence... Wake and Guam, would have hazarded a guess that by March the enemy would be astride all the It was therefore ... on behalf of the south-west Pacific except General MacArthurs Australian Government that we looked to gallant men and Australia and New Zealand? America as the paramount factor on the But that is the case, and realizing very swiftly democracies side in the Pacific. that it would be the case, the Australian Government sought a full and proper recognition of the part the Pacific was playing in We have no qualms here. There is no fifth the general strategic disposition of the worlds column in this country. We are all the one race, warring forces. the English-speaking race. We will not yield We looked to America, among other things, easily a yard of our soil. We have great space for counsel and advice, and therefore it was our here, and tree by tree, village by village and town wish that the Pacific War Council should be by town, we will fall back if we must. That will located in Washington. It is a matter of some occur only when we lack the means of meeting

47 JOHN CURTIN the enemy with parity in materials and machines India. I say to you that the saving of Australia is For remember, we are the Anzac breed. Our the saving of Americas west coast. Ifyou believe men stormed Gallipoli. They swept through the anything to the contrary, then you delude Libyan desert, they were the "rats" of Tobruk, yourselves. they were the men who fought under "bitter, Be assured of the calibre of our national sarcastic pugnacious Gordon Bennett" down character. This war may see the end ofmuch that Malaya and were still fighting when the we have painfully and slowly built up in our one surrender of Singapore came. hundred and fifty years of existence. But even These men gave of their best in Greece and though all of it go, there will still be Australians Crete. They will give more than their best on fighting on Australian soil until the turning their own soil, where their hearths and homes lie point be reached, and we will advance over under enemy threat. blackened ruins, through blasted and fire-swept Our air force is in the Kingsford Smith cities, across scorched plains, until we drive the tradition. You have no doubt met quite a lot of enemy into the sea. them in Canada. The Nazis have come to know I give you the pledge of my country. There them in Hamburg and Berlin, and in paratroop will always be an Australian government and landings in France. Our naval forces silently do there will always be an Australian people. We are their share on the seven seas. too strong in our hearts, our spirit is too high, I am not boasting to you. But, were I to say the justice of our cause throbs too deeply in our less, I would not be paying proper due to a band being, for that high purpose to be overcome. of men who have been tested in the crucible of world wars and hall-marked as pure metal... Business interests in Australia are For remember, we are the Anzac breed. submitting with a good grace to iron control and Our men stormed Gallipoli. These men drastic elimination of profits. Our great labour gave of their best in Greece and Crete. unions are accepting the suspension of rights They will give more than their best on and privileges which have been sacred for two their own soil. generations, and are submitting to an equally iron control of the activities of their members. It is now "work or fight" for everyone in Australia. I may be looking down a vista of weary . The Australian Government has so shaped months of soul-shaking reverses, of grim its policy that there will be a place for every struggles, of back-breaking work. But as surely citizen in the country. There are three means of as I sit here, talking to you across the war-tossed service — in the fighting forces, in the labour Pacific Ocean, I see our flag, I see Old Glory, I forces and in the essential industries. For the first see the proud banner of the heroic Chinese, I see time in the history of the country, a complete the standard of the valiant Dutch. And I see call-up or draft, as you refer to it in America, has them flying high in the wind of liberty over a been made... Pacific from which aggression has been wiped Australia is the last bastion between the out; over peoples restored to freedom; and flying west coast of America and the Japanese. If triumphant, as the glorified symbols of united Australia goes, the Americas are wide open. nations strong in will and in power, to achieve It is said that the Japanese will by-pass decency and dignity, unyielding to evil in any Australia and that they can be met and routed in form.

Reprinted from Irene Dowsing, Curtin of Australia, Melbourne, Acacia Press, 1969.

48 FOLLOW UP

The Bicentenary Controversy

The Summer IPA Review carried a report by Dr. Ken Baker critical of plans released by the Australian Bicentennial Authority (ABA) for their failure to reflect an adequate appreciation of Australias foundations, traditions and achievements. Below the Chairman of the ABA, John Reid, responds to these criticisms, and in the pages following Ken Baker replies.

J.B. Reid When in 1979 the Prime Minister, Mr. spectacle of that loyalty. Fraser, announced that Australia would celebrate 2. We think a national celebration is important its Bicentenary in 1988, and the creation of the or very important. Authority to develop a programme for the 3. We are sick of divisions and see the celebrations, the task was at the same time easy Bicentenary as an opportunity to unite us as and extraordinarily difficult. one people On the one hand, the Authority was given 4. We want to know more of the background of no directions or policy — in other words a blank the over 100 nationalities who make up the piece of paper, and on the other, no precedents Australian people — who they were, where to guide or shackle in mobilising almost sixteen they came from and the contribution they million people to join in one cause, of which have made to Australia. most were totally ignorant and some who, 5. We want to know more of what we have done thought they knew, were thoroughly in Australia in the past 200 years — the good disapproving. things and the achievements, but to preserve a In order to develop a philosophy and perspective we want to know about our direction for the Bicentenary it would have been failures — to help us plan the next 100 years easy to gather up a collection of tenets from the for Australia and its people. main political streams and cobble them together. 6. In planning the Bicentenary, we dont want to That course, however, was rejected because its be told what to do. We want to develop our end would have been to encourage division own plans for our community, city, society, rather than to seek as a base the things that tend company etc, etc. to unite us as a people. 7. While fireworks, spectacles and fun have their We therefore called groups of people places, we want to leave behind memorials of together for discussion and advice round use to future generations to tell them this was Australia. They had a great diversity of what we did in our Bicentennial year. backgrounds. From that process slowly emerged Some people may find this a surprising set some principles which have been and continue to of attitudes held by Australians. They are be tested at meetings throughout the country of certainly demanding if rigorously applied. But Bicentennial Community Committees, clubs, they are firmly held, make no mistake about it. societies, sporting bodies etc. etc. and they Let us come to the groups who might be hostile remain intact. to participating, or shy, or for other reasons What the Australian people told us then and reluctant. repeat again today are: If one accepts, as the Authority does, that 1. We are proud of, and we love, our country maximum willing and enthusiastic participation but we are not going to make a public of 16 million people is a prime objective, then it

49 THE BICENTENARY CONTROVERSY

is worth taking some time in explaining and management before writing his article. He relies persuading. The more so, since the Authoritys upon one document to judge the attitudes and role, apart from developing the Commonwealth role of the Authority. There are many and State Government funded programmes, is to publications, films, posters and tapes which do act as a catalyst and stimulant for the Australian this. community to develop and stage its own He assumes that it is the role of the celebrations which, if human time and energy Authority to lay down in specific terms what were to be costed, will aggregate many times the Australians believe in and hold dear as cash contribution of governments. institutions. As indicated above, we do not see Programmes for the Bicentenary will, with the role of the Authority as telling anyone to do the exception of the Tall Ships and The or not do anything. To suggest that it should is Australian Exhibition, be run by the thousands to go beyond its role as expounder and to give it of organisations and individuals who run things one as director of the collective view (whatever now each year. They will make a special effort that might be and however derived). To do so for 1988 and the results of that experience will would take away from the people what they have enhance the quality of what they do in later said they require, namely the right to determine years. the form and content of their own celebrations, A large number of potential participants which will reveal in the process their own have and will have little difficulty in developing priorities. their special contributions and joining in. While, therefore, the Authority quite However, as every interviewer is quick to ask, deliberately takes no advocate position on the why should the Aboriginals find anything to matter of the flag, present or hypothetical, celebrate? In years of discussions with anthems, monarchy vs republicanism, etc. etc. a Aboriginal peak bodies, the Authority has put cursory examination of Bicentennial the view, which is largely accepted, that we are all publications will show the Australian flag as a Australians, including the Aboriginals, and there standard feature. will be much better opportunties for bridge For the Authority, maintaining a politically building between black and white Australians bipartisan position has its hazards. A public within the framework of the Bicentenary, rather competition and survey selected "Living than by the Aboriginals staying out or Together" as the theme, despite the sneers and boycotting the Bicentenary, as has been sniggers of some. When the Fraser Government proposed on several occasions. Aboriginal changed the theme to "The Australian communities, tribes and organisations are Achievement", the adverse reaction was fierce as already planning their participation. letters to the Authority indicate. The change In the case of many migrant groups, long back to "Living Together" by the Hawke and careful discussion has encouraged them to Government was well received, albeit quietly. see not only a place for them, but one where To be even-handed, the Authority, on the effort in planning and accomplishment will best advice available used blue and gold as the make a realistic achievement of some of the national colours, incorporated as they are in the objectives set out earlier. Australian Coat of Arms and the Order of The handicapped, the aged, the shut-in, Australia. The decision of the present other who for a variety of reasons find it Government last April on the national anthem difficult or impossible to join in — have all been and its announcement of green and gold as the contacted and are working at their national colours required a major redesign of contributions. everything. The Authority does not apologise for its Dr. Bakers highly selective assessment of cautious approach in seeking national what the Authority is doing or fails to do, definitions, nor the painstaking efforts, in terms neglects two important facts: of peoples time and in the language used, in First, to take his Themes Ignored, if they communicating it to the people mainly through were to be produced as the main agenda for the our publications. Celebrations - a large number of Australians Dr. Ken Baker, so far as can be determined, would reject it, not necessarily because they has not spoken to any one of the Board or disagree or do not subscribe to the views, but

50 THE BICENTENARY CONTROVERSY because they will not tolerate dogmas being The Authority is working with the rammed down their throats. Themes Ignored Committee to give them a list of activities in could well have included nuclear disarmament, which they might participate. We are also abortion, anarchy, a 24 hour week. While some planning manifestations of Australia in Britain people may advocate these they are not on the during 1988. Authoritys agenda either. The list depends very In the United States, the American much on the selective eye of the beholder. Australian Bicentennial Foundation has been Second, within the Government funded and established by President Reagan for the same community programmes all of the items he lists objectives. Once again good progress has been will have their place, together with hundreds made. In the recent visit by the Prime Minister to more, to the extent that enough Australians wish Washington the President agreed to important to include them — and they, in all probability, American contributions to the Bicentenary. The will. Foundation is working on others. A serious error of fact must be corrected. At In Japan, Holland and Germany similar no time has the Authority planned or endorsed committees have been created. The work a reenactment of the arrival of the First Fleet in continues in drawing international involvement Sydney, accordingly it has not dropped plans to into both the Bicentenary and the Exposition. stage it. The Authority funded a study which Round Australia, quietly and with little revealed that it would cost between $25m-30m, media recognition, the smaller communities are and most of that would be expended in the U.K. getting on with their planning. or en route to Sydney. Even more serious than Out of the 839 Local Government units - that, however, the Board of the Authority could cities, municipalities and shires — 400 have see no justification for such expenditure which established Bicentennial Community would be of no interest to the rest of Australia. Committees and more are in process of On the contrary it would be a perfect agent for formation. national divisiveness. They are working to enhance the size and As matters stand today, awareness of the quality of the annual calendar of events. Bicentenary is growing at an appropriate pace, Surprisingly few of us actually know what given that we are just over 1000 days from 1st happens in our own community, so that is the January 1988. Equally gratifying is the uniform first step. The annual show, football carnival, enthusiasm right across Australia. The Authority guide or scout concert etc, etc are indentified and has been at great pains to assure the rest of plans made to enlarge them and make them even Australia that it is not just a glorified celebration more interesting. To that is being added special of Sydney Harbour. projects, frequently under discussion for a long The Authority is concerned that the time, now given a sense of urgency because time celebrations should not just be inward looking. is running out. Like restoring old buildings, Australias relations with Britain are tidying up a piece of wasteland, a new swimming particularly important. As the founding nation, pool — the list is almost endless. the supplier of the greater part of Australias Therefore, be not afraid. The Australian. migrant population, the Westminster system of people will celebrate their Bicentenary. It may Government, the rule of Law and a great deal of come as a surprise to some what traits of early trade in both primary and secondary character may thereby be revealed. As Lord industries. The British also gave us the Asquith said in 1915, "Trust the people". foundations of the trade union movement, the basis for our defence forces and world Dr. Ken Baker replies communications systems. The British Government has created the My criticisms of the current Bicentennial Britain Australia Bicentennial Committee which plans were directed at the Australian is working on a programme for involvement in Bicentennial Authoritys "National Programme the Bicentenary, the World Exposition in of Projects and Events". This is far from being Brisbane (where they are the first signatory as an just any document. Indeed, Mr. Reid himself international participant) and the opening of states in the opening sentence of the Chairmans Parliament House in May 1988. introduction to the ABA Annual Report

51 THE BICENTENARY CONTROVERSY

1983-84: not dropped plans to support the re-enactment; "The most significant event relating to the simply because it never officially endorsed such Authority in the year under review was the plans. It is true however that such endorsement decision by Federal Cabinet on 8 May to was under consideration. approve the National Programme of Projects If the Authority is anxious to avoid and Events for the Bicentenary". "national divisiveness" as indeed it should be, The "National Programme" as stated in its then it should look harder at aspects of the preface (again by Mr. Reid) provides the "focus existing programme — such as multiculturalism and overall direction for the Bicentennial Year .... and trade unionism — which seem far more and establishes guidelines for further activities". likely than a reenactment of the First Fleets It is the Bicentenarys "focus and overall arrival to provoke division. direction" as layed down in this document which Mr. Reid offers nothing other than stimulated my criticisms. impressionistic evidence based on letters received The concern I expressed in my article by the Authority to justify the change of the centred on the omission of themes from the Bicentennial motto from the "Australian National Programme central to the origins, Achievment" to "Living Together". Yet a survey development and identity of Australia (see published by the ABA in its December 82 - table). At the same time a number of groups and January 83 Newsletter — only a few months issues are given special attention, for example before the change was made — revealed that, of multiculturalism, womens activities, Aboriginal eight projects listed, the "Australian culture and the contribution of trade unions to Achievement" ranked highest in terms of level of Australias development. The plans suggest that interest and support. This scarcely speaks well of the Bicentennial Authority may have been overly the Authoritys willingness to respond to public responsive to the demands of vocal special opinion. interest groups, such as the trade union Most perplexing is the Authoritys officially movement, at the expense of the interests, stated stance of neutrality towards Australias aspirations and concerns of the unorganised national symbols and institutions, such as the mass of ordinary Australians. flag and monarchy. It is surely ironical that a The National Programme is not the only body whose very raison detre is the celebration ABA document to suggest this conclusion. The of Australias national heritage should refuse to February 85 issue of "Bicentenary 88", endorse the nations key symbols and published by the ABA is a eulogy to trade institutions. unionism, describing the international trade Nothing better illustrates this equivocal union movement as "the greatest bond of attitude of the Authority to Australias cultural common interest humanity has ever known". traditions than the guidelines released by the Turning now to specific points in Mr. Reids Authority for the commissioning of works of art response, let me say, first, that I welcome the for the Bicentenary. The guidelines state in part: acknowledgement of the particular importance "Preference will be given to commissionings of Australias relations with Britain. I also which reflect present day Australia, or deal with welcome Mr. Reids recognition of the value of the future, rather than projects which re-enact Australias links with the United States. The the past". As the composer, Larry Sitsky, has point remains, however, that relationships as argued, such a ruling would have excluded many important as these should be accorded a central of the great works of musical composition of the place in the National Programme. last two centuries. I cannot agree with Mr. Reids suggestion In another sense, of course, the Authority is that a re-enactment of the landing of the First not as neutral as it alleges. As the Bicentennial Fleet would be of interest only to Sydneyites and Authoritys agenda indicates (see the table), "a perfect agent for national divisiveness". there are some themes which are given special Applied consistently this argument would lead to place in the National Programme and others, the cancelling of the planned opening of the new such as British heritage and key national Parliament House in Canberra in 1988 an event symbols, which are excluded. Systematic which is also located in one city. As for my exclusion hardly equals neutrality. "serious error of fact" it is true that the ABA has Mr. Reids comments on my "Themes

52 THE BICENTENARY CONTROVERSY

Ignored" is based on a misunderstanding of intention to advocate that the Authority attempt either my argument or Australian culture. To to define Australians values, my argument is suggest that "anarchy" and a "24 hour week" that the Authority should be more responsive to could be thrown into the same basket as private the existing values of ordinary Australians. To enterprise, the ANZAC spirit, the successful fail to do so will mean as I concluded in my absorption of migrants and the family is plainly earlier article, that the 1988 Bicentennial Iudicrous. celebrations will not arouse the support they It misses the point that there are core values, should and, indeed, might even breed the sort of institutions and traditions which unite the nation national division which the Authority is keen to and give the society its identity. The fact that it avoid. is possible to find individuals who believe in Finally, I am pleased to see from a recent anarchy is entirely irrelevant, because such a interview in The Bulletin (June 18) that at least belief occupies at best a marginal position in the ABAs Chief Executive, Dr. Armstrong, has Australian culture. Private enterprise, the family, acknowledged that he found my criticisms of the the Anzac spirit and so on do not. Mr. Reids National Programme "helpful". He also comment simply underlines the Bicentennial concedes "that we (the ABA) have to give more Authoritys image of Australia presented in the attention to the mainstream and to give more "National Programme": a land of incoherent time re-assuring the mainstream that we are not diversity without a core of identity, without a mob of trendy, long-haired anarchists... I look unifying institutions, traditions and values. forward to moves in that direction. As should be evident, far from it being my

The Bicentennial Agenda

This table sets out some of the themes, institutions and groups singled out for special attention in the ABAs programme. The right hand column lists themes not covered in the programme. The Current Bicentennial Programme Themes Ignored "Living Together" "The Australian Achievement" Multiculturalism Successful assimilation of migrants Leisure recreation Work ethic Sport High living standards Religious diversity Christian traditions Arts The Anzacs Aboriginal Culture British Heritage Links with Pacific neighbours British Commonwealth Community based activities Alliance with America Womens activities The family Contribution of trade unions Private enterprise Film television Federation Education The legal system the rule of law Aviation, tall ships The Monarchy Skill Olympics Entrepreneurship Science A workable Constitution Historic sites, tracks manuscripts Freedom of speech press Youth Freedom of association The aged Democracy Participation of disabled Relative social harmony Bicentennial flag logo The Australian Flag

53 THE LUCENT NARY CONTROVERSY

Controversy surrounding the Bicentennial Authority

The 1988 industry Silencing the Past "This is the scandal of the 1988 industry. The bicentennial "The National Bicentennial Commission Program was year has already spawned a sizable industry of construction advertised in newspapers all around Australia recently. The projects, publications, organisation and propaganda. One of Bicentennial Authority, not before time, and possibly too late the most significant aspects of this is the way in which the yesterday, is hoping to create multi-art works of a grand scope current orthodoxies of the "progressives" in the universities to mark our 200 years. have taken over the bicentennial. In effect, they are at public "I was appalled, however, to read that "preference will be expense re-writing the history of Australia to fit their own given to commissionings which reflect present-day Australia, or views, and in the course of it trying to convince Australians that deal with the future, rather than projects which re-enact the they have nothing to be proud of in their history, no reason to past. celebrate the bicentenary, and have no right to Australia "As a composer interested in opera and music-theatre, I anyway. The writing of the bicentennial history is dominated by could not but reflect upon the singular narrowmindness of such the kindergarten Marxists, the peaceniks, the loony feminists a policy. If the remembrance or glorification of the past is and the inverted racists of the black land rights movement". considered unsuitable, just think how many great works of "Editorial: The Australian Financial Rev /eu; April 1, 1985. music and opera would never have been written: none of the "Ring Cycle" (or indeed any Wagner), most of Verdi, No "White Wank" Monteverdi, Donizetti, Moussorgsky, Tchaikovsky, etc, etc. "I for one would not want to be involved in a Bicentenary Larry Sitsh}; Composer Sydney Morning herald that does not address the running sore of black/white relations in this country. If it is to be a white wank I want nothing to do with it". The Flag Dr. David Armstrong, ChiefErecutive, Australian Bicentennial . I find it extraordinary that the body charged with Authority, quoted in Quadrnnl, October, 1984. organising activities to celebrate 200 years of our national heritage should refuse to support our national symbols. After British Pioneers all, symbols such as the flag, the Crown and (whatever your religion, or lack of it) the Christian cross are integral to "Instead of being inspired by the short history of this nation of ours since 1788, the present generation is being Australias history and identity. brainwashed into feeling guilty about the Nazi-scale sins of the ....Failure to give such symbols and institutions a central founding fathers... place in the bicentenary is bidding fair to turn 1988 from a year of celebration of national unity and achievement into a year of "The Bicentenary celebrations seem to be firmly in the national division and self-doubt". hands of a bunch of academic wimps trying to orchestrate an orgy of breast-beating and hand-wringing about the last 200 John Stone, former Secretar y to the Treason; Canberra Times. years". April 2, 1983. Alan Fitzgerald, The Age, Februar y 2, 1985. Bicentennial Motto Ruling Ideology ... Mr. Speaker, it comes as something of a considerable "The Australian Bicentennial Authority was one of the surprise to read "Bicentenary 88: Special Issue, released by the biggest winners of the August budget ... Regrettably it is one of Ausiralian Bicentennial Authority, which outlines the program the least deserving of the Commonwealths sixteen cultural for the celebration of our 200 years of history. The theme authorities. "Living Together" is bad enough — it is insipid, uninspiring ".. the ruling ideology of the Authority is unworthy. This and reminiscent of the political tortures of the past two years ideology holds that 1988 should not be a year of celebration but — but to have discarded in its favour the theme "The Australian a year of self-accusation. Australia is an unjust and repellent Achievement" is unthinkable. Then we have the emphasis on society characterised by (in the words of its General Manager) the "diversity of cultural groups [hat have settled here in "racism, philistinism, materialism, lack of national pride, successive waves of immigration", without any emphasis on our widespread inequalities of opportunity, desecrated historical extraordinary achievement in coalescing those groups to sites, polluted streams". According to this ideology 1988 will be produce a free and unified society. splendid opportunity to instruct the great mass of Australians Julian Beale, AJP, House of Representatn es Hansard, April 17. who love Australia on its true nature". 1985. Quadrxnl, October, 1984.

Contempt for our Heritage Bicentennial Budget "It is in short a scandalous document. If, after all, under "The most damning accusation is that not much the guise of an offical celebration, we demonstrate such utter substantial seems to be actually happening. contempt for our past, what, one wonders can be said of the "Despite its 5-6 years of operations, despite the millions future". already spent on salaries, special consultants, travel, expensive Anthony McAdam, The Herald, Februar y 1, 1985. offices, computers, publicity, and overseas trips, the authority allegedly has lots of concepts but very few finalised details". The ABA and Historical Reality The National Times, Ma y 31-June 6. 1985. "In the case of the Australian Bicentennial Authority the white-anting of our heritage is less subtle — it simply pretends its not there, or at least, so it appears to critics embroiled in the National Division controversy that continues to surround the ABA and its " has thus inherited what might be termed a General Manager, Dr. D. Armstrong, whose extraordinary festival for positive discrimination. In effect the national caution against a "white wank" in the 1988 commemoration programme divides Australia by race, gender and age.... For was appropriately dissected by a columnist Alan Fitzgerald in Hawke — whose electoral strength is derived from his wide this newspaper on February 2". appeal to the general population — identification with a "The government should ... instruct the ABA to fall into Bicentenary of minorities and political favourites could line with historical reality or make way for those who will". backfire". Michael Barnard, The Age, February 12, 1985. Tian Duncan, The Bulletin, June 18, 1985. pp. 46-48 .

54 Telecom and Competition

In the Summer IPA Review, Chris Trengove argued against the Government continuing to bolster Telecoms monopolistic status. Here Telcoms Chairman responds to Chris Trengoves criticisms.

R. W. Brack May I make a few observations about Mr. the USA has speeded up progress. The 43rd Trengoves article on Telecom in your Summer report of the US Congressional Committee on 1985 Issue? Government Operations expressed reservations. Telecom is not retarding technological At the recent convention of the US Telephone progress. The Australian network with the Association the keynote speaker observed that rapidly expanding use of digital switching and the results of deregulation and divestiture transmission puts it in the first rank of developed reminded him of the American soldier entering countries. Telecoms special data transmission a town in France in World War II. He said "We networks . (Digital Data Network, AUSTPAC, sure liberated the hell out of this place". etc) compare favourably with any country. There is competition in the supply of terminal devices which are electrically safe and Chris Trengove Replies: maintain network standards. Over 7000 different terminals have been approved for connection, While I do not question the veracity of Mr. and these compete with Telecom offerings. Bracks statements regarding Telecoms recent Telecom support for hi-tech development in performances, I do not feel that they necessarily local industry has meant all new services have address the criticisms of Australian government electronic push button telephones as standard policy contained in my article. My principal equipment -- the only authority in the world to theme is that, while other countries are do so. progressing, in a variety of ways, in the direction Certainly Telecom is introducing a of greater liberalisation of their ComputerPhone, . but this will face strong telecommunications industries, Australias competition from other suppliers. Labor Government has adopted policies aimed Mr. Trengove quotes from a quite inaccurate at strengthening the monopoly position of article in the Australian Financial Review of Telecom. In an industry long characterised by November 22, 1984 which alleged that government intervention worldwide, I would prohibitions are placed on the connection of argue that policy initiatives favouring terminals with built-in modems. These are liberalisation are all the more desirable, given the permitted, and at any data rate when connected rapid and divergent technological change which to the switched telephone network. He need only is taking place. look at the spate of advertising to see that Of course Telecom has been instrumental in terminals of the ComputerPhone type are being introducing new technology into Australia. My offered by private suppliers. concern, though, is rather more with those Telecom encourages customers to use the innovations which emanate from outside network and does not deny access to safe and Telecom. History has shown that legally reliable equipment. protected monopolies inevitably become vehicles Cross subsidy of telecommunications for for resisting changes which proceed from rural and remote areas is inherent in the Telecom elsewhere. charter which has been maintained by successive This is borne out by the three examples I governments. The costs are on record. gave in my article. To reiterate: It is questionable whether deregulation in • AUSSAT has been prohibited from engaging

55 TELECOM in the provision of telecommunications marketing to someone else.... As it stands now, services which might compete with Telecom; Telecom has left itself open in the long — and While Mr. Brack implies that permission is short-term to claims of vested interests in a given for attachments which are "electrically whole spectrum of its activities". safe and meet network standards", others Finally, it would appear likely that the allege that these are not the only criteria policy of cross-subsidisation is partly responsible employed. To quote once again from The for some of the tardiness in introducing new Canberra Times (September 21, 1984), new technology, since the uneconomic rural services import regulations are "designed to prevent must be paid for by elevated charges elsewhere. imports of phones which compete with While it may well be the case that government Telecom models". policy mandates that such cross-subsidies take In the case of the ComputerPhone, the place, I would reserve my right to disagree with editorialist of the Australian Financial Review government policy. At the very least, I would (September 12, 1984) is not the only person to argue that if rural services are to be subsidised, express some concern over Telecoms role. To then they should be explicitly subsidised, quote from the review of the product in whether by taxpayers as a whole, or by explicit Australian Personal Computer (January, 1985 levies on other telecommunications services. In p.26): "Just as the law must be seen to be that event, the costs of the subsidy would be upheld, so it would have been wise for more visible, and more liberal policies could be Telecom to encourage such a product in the adopted. Australian market-place but leave the

THE AUSTRALIAN ADAM SMITH CLUB Dinner -- Meeting in Melbourne on Wednesday the 28th day of August 1985 MR. FRANK PEN HALLU RIACK will speak on FREEDOM TO TRADE

Enquiries to Dr Tom Jellinek Tel. 342 4361 (B.H.) or Justin Brooks Tel. 789 9078 (A.H.)

56 INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS

The Institutes of Public Affairs seek to promote awareness and debate in matters of community interest and public policy. A basic aim of the Institutes is to advance the cause of political and economic freedom. In pursuit of this aim they endeavour to inform the Australian public about the workings of our economy and society. The IPA Review, produced by the IPA in Victoria on behalf of the Institutes in all three States, publishes the internal research work of the Institute as well as drawing on expertise in academia, business, the professions and other sections of the community. The Institutes are non-profit, non-partisan educational organisations financed by business enterprises and people throughout Australia. Each Institute is controlled by an independent council. (See below). VICTORIA NEW SOUTH WALES QUEENSLAND President Charles Goode Sir Eric McClintock Sir James Foots Director Rod Kemp Alec Simpson Gerry Gallagher Address IPA, IPA (N.S.W.), IPA (Qld.), 83 William Street, 56 Young Street, Box 2458, G.P.O., Melbourne, 3000. Sydney, 2000. Brisbane, 4001. Telephone: (03) 61 2029 (02) 231 4755 (07) 229 4465 Telex No. AA151648 Facsimile No. (03)624444 Editor of the Review: Rod Kemp

IPA COUNCILS

VICTORIA `R.J HORNSBY I. BOOTH LEX FRANCIS J.A. LECKEY "J.W. BUTTERS DR. D.R. GIBSON CHARLES B. GOODE SIR ERIC McCLINTOCK J.R. CADWALLADER DR. N.S. GIRDIS C.B.E. (President and Chairman • DENYS 1. McCULLOUGH D.M. CARMENT CHARLES B. GOODE Executive Committee) J.A. McINTOSH P. CHARLTON NEIL M. GOW, C.M.G. SIR JAMES BALDERSTONE, SIR JAMES McNEILL, C.B.E. S. DAVIS H.A. GRIFFIT!-IS O.B.E. (Past President) W.D. McPHERSON R.L. DEAN, C.B.E. E.R. HOOK SIR WILFRED BROOKES, L.J. MANGAN SIR NOEI. FOLEY, C.H.E. DR, W.L. HUGHES, C.B.E. C.B.E., D.S.O. J.L. NAVE SIR JAMES FOOTS WARREN HYNE HUGH M. MORGAN, (Treasurer) G.M. NIALL CHARLES B. GOODE PAUL LEE D.S. ADAM HILTON J. NICHOLAS, O.B.E. J.R. HARROWELL SIR ERIC McCLINTOCK F.M. BETHWAITE SIR IAN POTTER PROFESSOR W. HOGAN SIR ROBERT MATHERS M.D. BRIDGLAND J.W.R. PRATT W.J. HOLCROFT, A.O. GAIL MALONE SIR LAURENCE BRODIE-HALL N.E. RENTON L. HOLLINGS J.C. MYERS C.M.G. P.D. RITCHIE PROFESSOR DAME LEONIE K.W. OSHEA D.J. BRYDON NORMAN N. ROBERTSON, KRAMER, D.B.E. L.T. PADMAN, O.B.E. DR. BUNNEY C.S.E. R.P. MEAGHER, Q.C. "WA. PALMER J.A. CAIVERTJONES PROFESSOR JOHN ROSE M.T. SANDOW SENATOR V.R. PARER T. MARCUS CLARK NORMAN W. SAVAGE, A.M. H. WIDDUP W. HUNTER PERKINS D.G. CORDNER R.A. SIMPSON Management Committee SIR RODERICK PROCTOR, SIR PETER DERHAM J.H. VALDER, C.H.E. M.B.E. J.Q. ELLIOTT THE HON. VERNON WILCOX, NORMAN W. SAVAGE, A.M. D.L. ELSUM C.B.E., Q.C. QUEENSLAND Ti. STEEL SIR FRANK ESPIE, O.B.E. SIR BRUCE WATSON Executive Committee SIR JAMES FOOTS. (President) SIR JAMES FOOTS • R.M. WYLIE A. GIBSON J.A. MILLS R. KEVAN GOSPER (Chairman Executive Committee) Execulice Committee SIR ANDREW GRIMWADE, N.S.W. V.B. ALDRICH C.H.E. SIR ERIC McCLINTOCK G.F. BERKELEY J.A. HANCOCK, O.B.E. (President) N.H. BLUNT D.M. HOCKING `Dr. B.I. ALDRICH K.H. DREDGE SIR JOHN HOLLAND J.N. BARBER (Vice-President) I.M. DYMOCK rte ^, `-`-•.• _ w _ ^lcr^. `X Y ^ r;+. . -3 7cgf ^•,

fft{4 r ^ { { -

I .-

- - It r INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS. `

Registered by-Australia Post — Publication No. VBG 1536 -•