DOCSLIB.ORG

Wikimania 2019 – the International Wikimedia Conference Aula Magna, Stockholm University Stockholm, Sweden 17 August 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wikimania 2019 – the International Wikimedia Conference Aula Magna, Stockholm University Stockholm, Sweden 17 August 2019 Caucasian Collaboration Analysis of Opportunities for North Caucasus Region to Participate in the Wiki Loves Caucasus International Wikipedia Article Contest Presented at Wikimania 2019 – The International Wikimedia Conference Aula Magna, Stockholm University Stockholm, Sweden 17 August 2019 Oleg Abarnikov [User:Soul Train] Wikimedia RU Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Russia Borders of the North Caucasus Ethnic composition of the regions of the North Caucasus (in thousands of inhabitants, at least 5 thousand) Wikipedia editions statistics Native Opening WP:1000, WP:1000, Wikipedia Language family, group Articles speakers date % place (thousands) Russian Slavic languages, Indo-European family 2002.11 1,557,800 254,000 99.91 2 Chechen Vainakhish language, Northeast Caucasian family 2005.03 216,086 1,355 11.01 100 Lezgi Lezgic languages, Northeast Caucasian family 2012.03 3,972 784 6.47 135 Ossetian Iranian languages, Indo-European family 2005.03 11,646 500 4.71 157 Karachay-Balkar Kipchak languages, Turkic languages, Altaic family 2010.03 2,029 305 4.5 161 Kabardino-Cherkess Circassian languages, Abkhazo-Adyghean family 2011.03 1,583 516 3.02 196 Ingush Vainakhish language, Northeast Caucasian family 2018.04 1,041 456 2.49 211 Kalmyk Mongolic languges, Altaic family 2006.03 2,083 81 2.39 213 Avar Avar-Andic languages, Northeast Caucasian family 2005.04 2,299 715 1.52 241 Adyghe Circassian languages, Abkhazo-Adyghean family 2016.02 409 120 1.21 256 Lak Northeast Caucasian family 2006.10 1,219 146 1.16 259 Dynamics of creating articles (low/inactive editions) Dynamics of creating articles (more or less active editions) Wikipedia and WM Incubator editions on a map of the Republic of Dagestan and nearby regions. Author: Oleg Abarnikov Map source: Wikimedia Commons, File:Northeast Caucasus languages map.svg, authors: Don-kun, Furfur, Pmx. Said Misarbiev makes a report on the Rashida Gizatullina (Рəшиҙə Ғизəтуллина Anniversary logo of the Chechen Wikipedia at Moscow @ Bashkir WP) and Said Misarbiev during Chechen Wikipedia (200 Wiki-Conference 2017 Moscow Wiki-Conference 2017 thousand articles) Umar Tahirgeran: “There was a Umar Takhirgeran, reason why I didn’t back down — it photo from Facebook was the support that the (by permission of the participants of the ‘resistance’ – author) Soul Train, Saint Johann, Generous, Uncle Fred, and others – provided to me against the terrorists. I saw that we are on the right track.” Logo of the Ossetian Wikipedia Vyacheslav Ivanov: “The main problem of Ossetian Wikipedia is the lack of permanent editors. I don’t even know what to do with it — several times we held seminars. People come, nod their heads, and never return. I spoke on TV, wrote in a newspaper. I believe that we need to more often ‘storm’ mature editors of Russian Wikipedia from Ossetia (this practice has brought Taamu to the edition –eventually, he became the most permanent editor). Vyacheslav Ivanov (Amikeco) during Saint Petersburg Wiki-Conference 2007 Ilyas Bukarov (User from Dag) makes a presentation Oleg Abarnikov makes a report at the Dagestan State at the Moscow Wiki-Conference 2012 Pedagogical University, Makhachkala, 20 March 2018. Author: Mugerganets Ilyas Bukarov: “The depressive socio-economic situation in the region of the Lezgi’s residence does not contribute to the formation of a serious perception of Logo of the Lezgi Wikipedia non-profit activities, with the exception of charity. But in more prosperous societies, this, on the contrary, is perceived positively, since the fundamental needs are satisfied to a certain extent.” Participants from Lezgi, Russian, Bashkir, and Kazakh Dagestan Wiki-seminar 2017 participants: 1st stands a former Wikipedia editions at the Moscow Wiki-Conference administrator of Lezgi Wikipedia, journalist Murad 2014 Shikhakhmedov (Mugerganets). Спасибо за внимание! Thank you for your attention! Tack för din uppmärksamhet!.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • North Caucasian Languages
    The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication - TOJDAC April 2017 Special Edition COMPARISON OF VARIOUS QUANTITATIVE MEASURES OF PROXIMITY OF LANGUAGES: NORTH CAUCASIAN LANGUAGES Galeev Timur Ildarovich Kazan federal university (KFU), Kazan, Russia [email protected] Solovyev Valery Dmitrievich Kazan federal university (KFU), Kazan, Russia ABSTRACT A comparison of North Caucasian languages is performed in the article according to various measures of proximity constructed using grammatical, lexical and genetic databases. Statistical methods are applied to the study of correlations among these proximity measures, and also between them and both geographical proximity and genealogical kinship. A full correlation has been found among language kinship, geographic situation and genetic kinship of peoples. Also, a high correlation was found between each of them and lexical similarity. In general these correlations persist at different levels – starting at the whole set of studied languages until the level of the smallest groups of related languages. It is shown that a significant factor in the analysis of geographical situation is the existence of a common boundary between the regions of distribution of languages. Keywords: Various Quantitative Measures, geographical situation common boundary, Creativity, languages 1. INTRODUCTION The classification of languages by genetic kinship, developed in the last two centuries within the framework of historical linguistics applying the comparative historical method, offers a qualitative characteristic of language proximity by including them into macrofamilies, families, branches, groups, etc. Glottochronology provides a quantitative measure of proximity that, in particular, allows assessing the age of families and other language groups. Unfortunately, in many cases there is no consensus among experts about languages kinship; it must be said also that lexicostatistical data are controversial.
    [Show full text]
  • Contact-Induced Usages of Volitive Moods in East Caucasian Languages 1
    Nina Dobrushina State University Higher School of Economics Contact-induced usages of volitive moods 1 in East Caucasian languages 1. Introduction The purpose of this paper is to test a hypothesis of the influence of Azerbaijani on East Caucasian languages. It was noticed that most (if not all) Turkic languages widely use forms of imperatives and / or optatives for the main predicate of subordinate clauses of certain types, in particular purpose clauses and complement clauses of verbs of wish. I suppose that some East Caucasian languages had acquired these constructions under the influence of Azerbaijani. To support this hypothesis, I will consider the data of 13 East Caucasian languages and one Turkic language spoken in Dagestan. The structure of the article is as follows. Section 2 provides a preliminary discussion of Turkic Dagestanian contacts (2.1), justifies the choice of the languages in the sample (2.2), provides information on the contact situation for each of the languages (2.3), gives an overview of the imperative / optative forms in each language (2.4), argues that the subordinate usages of imperatives / optatives is a structural feature of Turkic languages (2.5), and introduces the constructions which will be diagnostic for the study (2.6). Languages which use volitional forms both in purpose clauses and in wish complement clauses are considered in Section 3, languages which have volitional forms only in purpose clauses are considered in Section 4, while Section 5 lists the languages which do not use volitional forms in subordinate clauses. Section 6 summarizes the discussion. 2.1. Turkic Dagestanian contacts According to the 2002 census, Turkic peoples constitute 20 percent of the population of Dagestan, while the speakers of East Caucasian languages are almost 75 %.
    [Show full text]
  • Stress Chapter
    Word stress in the languages of the Caucasus1 Lena Borise 1. Introduction Languages of the Caucasus exhibit impressive diversity when it comes to word stress. This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of the stress systems in North-West Caucasian (henceforth NWC), Nakh-Dagestanian (ND), and Kartvelian languages, as well as the larger Indo-European (IE) languages of the area, Ossetic and (Eastern) Armenian. For most of these languages, stress facts have only been partially described and analyzed, which raises the question about whether the available data can be used in more theoretically-oriented studies; cf. de Lacy (2014). Instrumental studies are not numerous either. Therefore, the current chapter relies mainly on impressionistic observations, and reflects the state of the art in the study of stress in these languages: there are still more questions than answers. The hope is that the present summary of the existing research can serve as a starting point for future investigations. This chapter is structured as follows. Section 2 describes languages that have free stress placement – i.e., languages in which stress placement is not predicted by phonological or morphological factors. Section 3 describes languages with fixed stress. These categories are not mutually exclusive, however. The classification of stress systems is best thought of as a continuum, with fixed stress and free stress languages as the two extremes, and most languages falling in the space between them. Many languages with fixed stress allow for exceptions based on certain phonological and/or morphological factors, so that often no firm line can be drawn between, e.g., languages with fixed stress that contain numerous morphologically conditioned exceptions (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biabsolutive Construction in Lak and Tsez
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Lingua 150 (2014) 137--170 www.elsevier.com/locate/lingua The biabsolutive construction in Lak and Tsez Annie Gagliardi a, Michael Goncalves a, Maria Polinsky a,*, Nina Radkevich b a Harvard University, USA b University of York, United Kingdom Received 12 November 2013; received in revised form 4 July 2014; accepted 8 July 2014 Available online Abstract In ergative constructions, the agent of a transitive verb is in the ergative case and the theme is in the absolutive case. By contrast, in biabsolutive constructions, both the agent and theme of a transitive verb appear in the absolutive case. This paper presents and analyzes the biabsolutive construction in two Nakh-Dagestanian languages, Lak and Tsez. Despite many surface similarities, the biabsolutive constructions in Lak and Tsez call for different syntactic analyses. We argue that the biabsolutive construction in Lak is an instance of restructuring in the presence of an aspectual head bearing a progressive (imperfective) feature. Tsez biabsolutive constructions, on the other hand, are biclausal; we argue that the theme and the lexical verb are contained in a PP complement selected by a light verb. Related languages may be classified as ‘‘Lak-type’’ or ‘‘Tsez-type’’ based on the behavior of their biabsolutives. The existence of two underlying structures for one surface pattern in Nakh-Dagestanian poses a learnability problem for a child acquiring a language with biabsolutive constructions. We outline a set of strategies used by a learner who must compare the available input data with a set of structural hypotheses. © 2014 Elsevier B.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Elevation As a Category of Grammar: Sanzhi Dargwa and Beyond Received May 11, 2018; Revised August 20, 2018
    Linguistic Typology 2019; 23(1): 59–106 Diana Forker Elevation as a category of grammar: Sanzhi Dargwa and beyond https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2019-0001 Received May 11, 2018; revised August 20, 2018 Abstract: Nakh-Daghestanian languages have encountered growing interest from typologists and linguists from other subdiscplines, and more and more languages from the Nakh-Daghestanian language family are being studied. This paper provides a grammatical overview of the hitherto undescribed Sanzhi Dargwa language, followed by a detailed analysis of the grammaticalized expression of spatial elevation in Sanzhi. Spatial elevation, a topic that has not received substantial attention in Caucasian linguistics, manifests itself across different parts of speech in Sanzhi Dargwa and related languages. In Sanzhi, elevation is a deictic category in partial opposition with participant- oriented deixis/horizontally-oriented directional deixis. This paper treats the spatial uses of demonstratives, spatial preverbs and spatial cases that express elevation as well as the semantic extension of this spatial category into other, non-spatial domains. It further compares the Sanzhi data to other Caucasian and non-Caucasian languages and makes suggestions for investigating elevation as a subcategory within a broader category of topographical deixis. Keywords: Sanzhi Dargwa, Nakh-Daghestanian languages, elevation, deixis, demonstratives, spatial cases, spatial preverbs 1 Introduction Interest in Nakh-Daghestanian languages in typology and in other linguistic subdisciplines has grown rapidly in recent years, with an active community of linguists from Russia and other countries. The goal of the present paper is to pour more oil into this fire and perhaps to entice new generations of scholars to join the throng.
    [Show full text]
  • The Present and the Future Within the Lezgic Tense and Aspect Systems∗
    TIMUR MAISAK (Institute of Linguistics, Moscow) The Present and the Future within the Lezgic tense and ∗ aspect systems In this paper those finite verbal forms of the Lezgic languages are discussed whose main function is to express the present or the future time reference. As a rule, such forms are built on imperfective non-finite forms and include a present copula. The following source patterns which usually give rise to Presents and Futures in these languages are analysed in detail: the Infinitive Pattern (“Infinitive + Copula”), the Locative Pattern (“Imperfective Converb + Locative Copula”), the Imperfective Converb Pattern (“Imperfective Converb + Copula”), and the Participle Pattern (“Imperfective Participle + Copula”). Grammaticalization paths of these patterns show much in common, in particular the ‘present’ to ‘future’ semantic evolution. Introduction Tense and aspect systems of languages belonging to the Lezgic group of the Nakh-Daghestanian (East Caucasian) family share the following important features — some of which are certainly not restricted to this particular group, but can be viewed as defining the typological profile of the family as a whole: • most finite indicative verbal forms are analytical, at least historically, and have more or less transparent structure: although at the present stage they can be morphologically rather tight (and, strictly speaking, synthetic), their original periphrastic structure is very often quite evident; • such analytical forms are most often made of one of three independently existing non-finite forms (a participle, a converb, or an infinitive) and a copula (a defective stative verb meaning ‘be, exist’ or ‘be inside’); • non-finite forms (at least participles and converbs) are regularly marked for either perfective or imperfective aspect, and as a rule are derived from the corresponding verbal stems: this constitutes what may be called the “perfective” vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Azeri Morphology in Kryz (East Caucasian) Gilles Authier Gilles Authier 2010
    Azeri morphology in Kryz (East Caucasian) Gilles Authier Gilles Authier 2010. Azeri morphology in Kryz (East Caucasian). Turkic Languages 10, xx-xx. Abstract: The paper deals with the copying of morphemes and patterns from Turkic into the morphology of Kryz, an East Caucasian language of northern Azerbaijan. The copied morphemes in question are clitics found in the periphery of the verb system (expressing evidentiality, indefiniteness) and valency-changing morphology imported globally together with Azeri forms, as well as adjective-forming derivational suffixes. The copied structures are more diverse, and have left a mark on many areas of the morphology, in both verb and noun phrases. Gilles Authier, 50 rue des Francs-Bourgeois, 75003 Paris, France E-mail: [email protected] 1. Introduction Most of the data presented here are taken from (Authier 2009), which is a complete description of one of the dialects of Kryz, a language belonging to the Lezgic branch of East Caucasian. In this paper we shall discuss some of the issues related to language contact which have left traces in the grammar of Kryz, namely the global and selective copying (for these terms see Johanson 2006a) of Turkic (Azeri) morphological features. There are some striking typological similarities between East Caucasian and Turkic languages, in contrast with other adjacent languages or language families such as North Caucasian, South Caucasian (Kartvelian) or Indo-European. For instance, the major strategies for subordinate clauses is left-branching, involving the use of non finite or low-focal elements as heads of subordinate clauses (participles in relative clauses, converbs in adverbial clauses, and masdars (nominalized verbs) in complement clauses); the unmarked word order is also rather similar (basically SOV, GN, AN) in Turkic and East Caucasian.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sketch of Northern Akhvakh (2Nd Draft, Revised August 2018)
    submitted for The Caucasian languages, an international handbook (Mouton, HSK series, edited by Yuri Koryakov, Yury Lander and Timur Maisak) A sketch of Northern Akhvakh (2nd draft, revised August 2018) Denis Creissels University of Lyon [email protected] http://deniscreissels.fr 1. Introduction 1.1. Northern Akhvakh: area and speakers. Akhvakh (ašʷaƛːi mic’ːi, Russian ахвахский язык) belongs to the Andic group of languages included in the Avar-Andic branch of the Northeast Caucasian (or Nakh-Daghestanian) family. The number of Akhvakh speakers is estimated at 20,000 by Magomedova & Abdulaeva (2007), but this evaluation is probably somewhat optimistic. Four varieties are recognized, whose status as dialects of a single language or distinct (although closely related) languages is unclear. The one referred to in this sketch (by far the most important as regards the number of speakers) is designated as Northern Akhvakh, whereas the other three are grouped under the label of Southern Akhvakh. Northern Akhvakh is spoken in six villages of the Axvaxskij Rajon in the western part of Daghestan (Tadmagitl’, Lologonitl’, Kudijab- Roso, Kvankero, Cvakilkolo, and Izano, whose total population is 7,200 according to the 2010 census), in recent settlements in the Xasavjurtskij Rajon of Daghestan (Kamyškutan and Sovetskoe, whose combined population is ca. 3,500), and in Axaxdərə near Zaqatala (Azerbaijan).1 The Southern Akhvakh varieties are traditionally spoken in one village each (Cegob, Tljanub and Ratlub), all situated in the Šamil’skij Rajon of Daghestan. 1.2. Dialects As already observed by Magomedbekova (1967: 8), Northern Akhvakh is rather homegeneous. In the texts I collected in Tadmagitl’, Lologonitl’, Sovetskoe, and Kamyškutan, I have found no variation that could be interpreted as a contrast between distinct dialects.
    [Show full text]
  • Languages of the Caucasus
    Languages of the Caucasus A free refereed web journal for linguistic work on languages of the Caucasus Univerbation via liaison and the evolution of lexicon and grammar in Northern Akhvakh Denis Creissels University of Lyon 2 [email protected] ABSTRACT One of the most striking particularities of Northern Akhvakh is the pervasiveness of a phonological process for which I use the term liaison, traditional in French linguistics. This phonological process blurs word boundaries, possibly resulting in various lexicalization and grammaticalization phenomena. In this paper, after describing the phonological process and discussing its conditioning, I examine its role in the evolution of the lexicon, the emergence of new grammatical forms, the development of infixation, and changes in the valency properties of Akhvakh verbs. Keywords Akhvakh, liaison, phonology, Daghestanian This is a contribution from Languages of the Caucasus, Vol. 1.1. © 2016 Denis Creissels ISSN 2375-2068 This Portable Document Format (PDF) file may not be altered in any way. Tables of contents, abstracts, and submission guidelines are available at escholarship.org/uc/languagesofcaucasus 107 Languages of the Caucasus, Vol. 1.1. © Denis Creissels 2016. ISSN 2375-2068 Received February 2015. Accepted December 2016. Univerbation via liaison and the evolution of lexicon and grammar in Northern Akhvakh DENIS CREISSELS University of Lyon 2 [email protected] 1. Introduction The term ‘univerbation’, commonly defined as the diachronic process by which aseQuence of two (or more) words is converted into a new single word, does not point to just one type of process. It encompasses structurally diverse phenomena that all fall under this definition.
    [Show full text]
  • Minorities in the South Caucasus: New Visibility Amid Old Frustrations
    DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS Minorities in the South Caucasus: New visibility amid old frustrations Author: Fernando GARCÉS DE LOS FAYOS Abstract One of the most multi-ethnic regions on Europe’s periphery, the South Caucasus’s bumpy path to democracy has often been accompanied by ethnic conflict, stoked by nationalism. Since acquiring independence from the Soviet Union, secessionist movements have grown among local minorities in the areas surrounding the countries’ new, sovereign borders. The lack of state mechanisms to channel such sentiments has led to violent ethnic clashes with long-lasting consequences. Today still, a lack of experience in conflict resolution and power- sharing between dominant and minority communities hinders the development of common ground and democratic co-existence. Mechanisms which promote parliamentary representation, law-making and the oversight of minority rights are still largely absent. Although reforms in the South Caucasus have pushed for new laws to create greater accountability, instruments promoting inclusive dialogue with the minorities require further development. For the minorities of the South Caucasus, the most pressing issues are a lack of respect and the protection of their rights. For the sake of state-building and democratic development of the region, inclusive policies must be implemented with respect to ethnic minorities, through their political participation, including them in the higher levels of decision-making. DG EXPO/B/PolDep/Note/2014_104 June 2014 ST/1030125 PE 522.341 EN Policy Department, Directorate-General for External Policies This paper is an initiative of the Policy Department, DG EXPO. AUTHORS: Fernando GARCÉS DE LOS FAYOS with contributions from Nata KERESELIDZE, intern (based on a previous paper by Anastasia BASKINA, intern) Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union Policy Department SQM 03 Y 71 rue Wiertz 60 B-1047 Brussels Editorial Assistant: Györgyi MÁCSAI CONTACT: Feedback of all kinds is welcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Caucasus Studies
    Caucasus Studies 1 Circassian Clause Structure Mukhadin Kumakhov & Karina Vamling 2 Language, History and Cultural Identities in the Caucasus Papers from the conference, June 17-19 2005 Edited by Karina Vamling 3 Conference in the fields of Migration – Society – Language 28-30 November 2008. Abstracts. 4 Caucasus Studies: Migration – Society – Language Papers from the conference, November 28-30 2008 Edited by Karina Vamling 5 Complementation in the Northwest and South Caucasian Languages Edited by Karina Vamling 6 Protecting Cultural Heritage in the Caucasus Papers from the conference, December 5-6 2018 Edited by Karina Vamling and Henrik Odden Caucasus Studies 6 Protecting Cultural Heritage in the Caucasus Papers from the conference December 5-6 2018 Edited by Karina Vamling and Henrik Odden Malmö University Faculty of Culture and Society Russia and the Caucasus Regional Research (RUCARR) Sweden Caucasus Studies 6 Protecting Cultural Heritage in the Caucasus. Papers from the Conference December 5-6 2018 Edited by Karina Vamling and Henrik Odden Cover design: Albert Vamling Published by Malmö University Faculty of Culture and Society Department of Global Political Studies, RUCARR S-20506 Malmö, www.mau.se © 2020, Department of Global Political Studies, RUCARR and the authors ISBN 978-91-7877-160-8 DOI 10.24834/isbn.9789178771608 Contents Contributors vii Introduction: Protecting cultural heritage in the Caucasus 9 Karina Vamling Renewed conflicts around ethnicity and education among the Circassians 14 Lars Funch Hansen Pre-Soviet and contemporary contexts of the dialogue of Caucasian cultures and identities 32 Magomedkhan Magomedkhanov and Saida Garunova Legal issues of the preservation of the cultural heritage in the (in Russian) 44 Mazhid Magdilov Circassians, Apkhazians, Georgians, Vainakhs, Dagestanians – peoples of old civilization in the Caucasus 53 Merab Chukhua Issues of functioning and protection of the Andic languages in polyethnic Dagestan (in Russian) 61 Magomed A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Grammar of Sanzhi Dargwa
    A grammar of Sanzhi Dargwa Diana Forker language Languages of the Caucasus 2 science press Languages of the Caucasus Editors: Diana Forker (Universität Jena), Nina Dobrushina (National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow), Timur Maisak (Institute of Linguistics at the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow), Oleg Belyaev (Lomonosov Moscow State University). In this series: 1. Daniel, Michael, Nina Dobrushina & Dmitry Ganenkov (eds.). The Mehweb language: Essays on phonology, morphology and syntax. 2. Forker, Diana. A grammar of Sanzhi Dargwa. A grammar of Sanzhi Dargwa Diana Forker language science press Forker, Diana. 2020. A grammar of Sanzhi Dargwa (Languages of the Caucasus 2). Berlin: Language Science Press. This title can be downloaded at: http://langsci-press.org/catalog/book/250 © 2020, Diana Forker Published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Licence (CC BY 4.0): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ISBN: 978-3-96110-196-2 (Digital) 978-3-96110-197-9 (Hardcover) DOI:10.5281/zenodo.3339225 Source code available from www.github.com/langsci/250 Collaborative reading: paperhive.org/documents/remote?type=langsci&id=250 Cover and concept of design: Ulrike Harbort Typesetting: Diana Forker, Felix Anker, Felix Kopecky Proofreading: Ahmet Bilal Özdemir, Andrew Spencer, Aniefon Daniel, Daryl MacDonald, Felix Kopecky, Ivica Jeđud , Jeroen van de Weijer, Jezia Talavera, Laura Arnold, Laurentia Schreiber, Mykel Brinkerhoff, Jean Nitzke, Sebastian Nordhoff, Sune Gregersen, Tom Bossuyt, Alena Witzlack, Yvonne Treis Fonts: Libertinus, Arimo, DejaVu Sans Mono Typesetting software:Ǝ X LATEX Language Science Press Unter den Linden 6 10099 Berlin, Germany langsci-press.org Storage and cataloguing done by FU Berlin Contents Acknowledgments xi Spelling conventions xiii Glosses and other abbreviations xv 1 Introduction 1 1.1 The Sanzhi community and the Sanzhi language .............
    [Show full text]