DOCSLIB.ORG

Practical Manual on Border Controls Along the Danube and Its Navigable Tributaries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Practical Manual on Border Controls Along the Danube and Its Navigable Tributaries EU Strategy for the Danube Region Priority Area 1a – To improve mobility and multimodality: Inland waterways Practical manual on border controls along the Danube and its navigable tributaries 3rd edition – May 2019 Author(s): Simon Hartl (viadonau) Ulf Meinel (viadonau) Deniza Staewa (viadonau) Version (date): 16/05/2019 1. General information ................................................................................................................... 5 2. How to use this manual? ............................................................................................................ 6 3. Geographic scope ...................................................................................................................... 6 4. Hungary ..................................................................................................................................... 8 4.1. General information on border controls ................................................................................... 8 4.1.1. Control process ...................................................................................................................... 9 4.1.2. Control forms ........................................................................................................................ 11 4.1.3. Additional information ........................................................................................................... 30 4.2. Information on specific border control points ......................................................................... 31 4.2.1. Mohács ................................................................................................................................. 31 5. Croatia ..................................................................................................................................... 33 5.1. General information on border controls ................................................................................. 33 5.1.1. Control process .................................................................................................................... 34 5.1.2. Control forms ........................................................................................................................ 36 5.2. Information on specific border control points ......................................................................... 49 5.2.1. Batina – Beli Manastir .......................................................................................................... 49 5.2.2. Aljmaš ................................................................................................................................... 50 5.2.3. Dalj – Osijek ......................................................................................................................... 51 5.2.4. Vukovar ................................................................................................................................ 52 5.2.5. Ilok ........................................................................................................................................ 53 6. Serbia ....................................................................................................................................... 54 6.1. General information on border controls ................................................................................. 54 6.1.1. Control process .................................................................................................................... 55 6.1.2. Control forms ........................................................................................................................ 56 6.1.3. Additional information ........................................................................................................... 62 6.2. Information on specific border control points ......................................................................... 63 6.2.1. Bezdan ................................................................................................................................. 63 6.2.2. Apatin ................................................................................................................................... 64 6.2.3. Novi Sad ............................................................................................................................... 65 6.2.4. Belgrade ............................................................................................................................... 66 6.2.5. Veliko Gradište ..................................................................................................................... 67 6.2.6. Donji Milanovac .................................................................................................................... 68 6.2.7. Kladovo ................................................................................................................................ 69 6.2.8. Prahovo ................................................................................................................................ 70 7. Romania ................................................................................................................................... 71 7.1. General information on border controls ................................................................................. 71 7.1.1. Control process .................................................................................................................... 72 7.1.2. Control forms ........................................................................................................................ 75 Creation date: 16/05/2019 20190516_3rd edition_Manual on Border Controls.docx Page 2 of 190 7.2. Information on specific border control points ......................................................................... 92 7.2.1. Moldova Veche..................................................................................................................... 92 7.2.2. Orşova .................................................................................................................................. 94 7.2.3. Drobeta Turnu Severin ......................................................................................................... 96 7.2.4. Calafat .................................................................................................................................. 98 7.2.5. Bechet ................................................................................................................................ 100 7.2.6. Corabia ............................................................................................................................... 102 7.2.7. Turnu Măgurele .................................................................................................................. 104 7.2.8. Zimnicea ............................................................................................................................. 106 7.2.9. Giurgiu ................................................................................................................................ 108 7.2.10. Olteniţa ............................................................................................................................. 110 7.2.11. Călăraşi Chiciu ................................................................................................................. 112 7.2.12. Cernavodă ........................................................................................................................ 114 7.2.13. Brăila ................................................................................................................................ 116 7.2.14. Galaţi ................................................................................................................................ 118 7.2.15. Tulcea ............................................................................................................................... 120 7.2.16. Sulina ............................................................................................................................... 122 7.2.17. Constanţa ......................................................................................................................... 124 7.2.18. Constanţa Sud.................................................................................................................. 126 8. Bulgaria .................................................................................................................................. 128 8.1. General information on border controls ............................................................................... 128 8.1.1. Control process .................................................................................................................. 129 8.1.2. Control forms ...................................................................................................................... 132 8.1.3. Additional information ......................................................................................................... 140 8.2. Information on specific border control points ....................................................................... 141 8.2.1. Vidin ................................................................................................................................... 141 8.2.2. Lom ...................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Police Academy of Montenegro
    PI VOCATIONAL SCHOOL POLICE ACADEMY The Police academy is located in Danilovgrad, Montenegro. It is the only Law Enforcement Educational institution in Montenegro. It was established by the Decision of the Montenegrin Government in March 2006 as a public institution with the status of legal entity. The Police academy was established as a result of the “Montenegrin Police Education Reform“project (2005) and was supported by: International Institutions and Associations; Competent Ministries; NGOs. The goal of Montenegrin Police and other Law Enforcement Agencies is to: Harmonize their activities with European standards; Increase the level of legality, accountability, professionalism and respect of human rights; Provide more efficient response to modern security challenges. The scope of work of the academy is: I - Education, training and professional development of the Police Directorate employees, implemented through: I/a – Basic Police Education; I/b – Supplementary courses for police officers; I/c – Professional and specialized training; I/d – Police management training; I/e – Foreign languages and computer science (ECDL standard). II - Education of the Ministry of Interior and Public Administration employees III - Education of the Customs employees IV - Education of the Penitentiary Institution employees V - Education, training and professional development of the employees dealing with persons and property protection staff – security services VI - Librarian, publishing and research related activities VII - International cooperation. The core task of the Police academy is Basic police education which enables students to gain: policing competences; the basic knowledge for professional and specialized development as well as professional career development. So far 256 cadets have completed Basic Police education. At this moment we are educating 22 cadets.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial of the Republic of Croatia
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (CROATIA v. YUGOSLAVIA) MEMORIAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA ANNEXES REGIONAL FILES VOLUME 2 PART I EASTERN SLAVONIA 1 MARCH 2001 II CONTENTS ETHNIC STRUCTURES 1 Eastern Slavonia 3 Tenja 4 Antin 5 Dalj 6 Berak 7 Bogdanovci 8 Šarengrad 9 Ilok 10 Tompojevci 11 Bapska 12 Tovarnik 13 Sotin 14 Lovas 15 Tordinci 16 Vukovar 17 WITNESS STATEMENTS TENJA 19 Annex 1: Witness Statement of M.K. 21 Annex 2: Witness Statement of R.J. 22 Annex 3: Witness Statement of I.K. (1) 24 Annex 4: Witness Statement of J.P. 29 Annex 5: Witness Statement of L.B. 34 Annex 6: Witness Statement of P.Š. 35 Annex 7: Witness Statement of D.M. 37 Annex 8: Witness Statement of M.R. 39 Annex 9: Witness Statement of M.M. 39 Annex 10: Witness Statement of M.K. 41 Annex 11: Witness Statement of I.I.* 42 Annex 12: Witness Statement of Z.B. 52 Annex 13: Witness Statement of A.M. 54 Annex 14: Witness Statement of J.S. 56 Annex 15: Witness Statement of Z.M. 58 Annex 16: Witness Statement of J.K. 60 IV Annex 17: Witness Statement of L.R. 63 Annex 18: Witness Statement of Đ.B. 64 WITNESS STATEMENTS DALJ 67 Annex 19: Witness Statement of J.P. 69 Annex 20: Witness Statement of I.K. (2) 71 Annex 21: Witness Statement of A.K. 77 Annex 22: Witness Statement of H.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts, Components and Ammunition To, from and Across the European Union
    Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts, Components and Ammunition to, from and across the European Union REGIONAL ANALYSIS REPORT 1 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts, Components and Ammunition to, from and across the European Union UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2020 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts, Components and Ammunition to, from and across the European Union REGIONAL ANALYSIS REPORT UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2020 © United Nations, 2020. All rights reserved, worldwide. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copy- right holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. UNODC would appreciate receiving a copy of any written output that uses this publication as a source at [email protected]. DISCLAIMERS This report was not formally edited. The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNODC, nor do they imply any endorsement. Information on uniform resource locators and links to Internet sites contained in the present publication are provided for the convenience of the reader and are correct at the time of issuance. The United Nations takes no responsibility for the continued accuracy of that information or for the content of any external website. This document was produced with the financial support of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect
    [Show full text]
  • Navigation on the Danube (Allied Powers: Czechoslovakia, Greece, Romania, Serb-Croat-Slovene Kingdom); Germany, Austria, Hungary and Bulgaria
    REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES Navigation on the Danube (Allied Powers: Czechoslovakia, Greece, Romania, Serb-Croat-Slovene Kingdom); Germany, Austria, Hungary and Bulgaria 2 August 1921 VOLUME I pp. 97-212 NATIONS UNIES - UNITED NATIONS Copyright (c) 2006 IV. CESSION OF VESSELS AND TUGS FOR NAVIGATION ON THE DANUBE *. PARTIES : Allied Powers (Czechoslovakia, Greece, Rumania, Serb-Croat-Slovene Kingdom); Germany, Austria, Hungary and Bulgaria. COMPROMIS : Treaty of Versailles, Article 339 2 ; Article 300 of Treaty of St. Germain 3 ; Article 284 of Treaty of Trianon and Article 228 of Treaty of Neuilly-sur- Seine. ARBITRATOR : Walker D. Hines (U.S.A.). DECISION : Paris, August 2, 1921. Confiscation of private property in warfare.—Allocation and condition of vessels of disputed ownership and nationality.—Question of jurisdiction. —Fourth Hague Convention of 1907 (Articles 46 and 53 of its annexed Regulations).—Legal character of private property hired by belligerent State for military purposes.—Effect of military acts after armistice between some but not all of the belligerents. General conditions for effectual ion of permanent allocation.—Delivery of vessels.—Claim for excess fittings and gear.—Vessels whose nationality is affected by change of nationality of owners.—Claims to allocation asserted by Czechoslovakia as a succession State. Cession by Germany, Austria ,md Hungary to meet legitimate needs of Allied and Associated Powers concerned.—Legitimate needs of States for freight traffic.—International character of the River Save,—Basic freight traffic on the Danube in 1911 to be considered in estimating legitimate needs of parties concerned.—Modification of such basis on account of subsequent developments.
    [Show full text]
  • Manual on Border Controls Along the Danube and Its Navigable Tributaries
    EU Strategy for the Danube Region Priority Area 1a – To improve mobility and multimodality: Inland waterways Practical manual on border controls along the Danube and its navigable tributaries Author(s): Milica Gvozdic (viadonau) Simon Hartl (viadonau) Katja Rosner (viadonau) Version (date): 31.08.2015 1 General information .................................................................................................................. 4 2 How to use this manual? .......................................................................................................... 5 3 Geographic scope .................................................................................................................... 5 4 Hungary ................................................................................................................................... 7 4.1 General information on border controls ................................................................................... 7 4.1.1 Control process ................................................................................................................... 8 4.1.2 Control forms ..................................................................................................................... 10 4.1.3 Additional information ....................................................................................................... 21 4.2 Information on specific border control points ......................................................................... 22 4.2.1 Mohács .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Action Plan for the Conservation of the Danube
    Action Plan for the Conservation of the European Ground Squirrel Spermophilus citellus in the European Union EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2013 1. Compilers: Milan Janák (Daphne/N2K Group, Slovakia), Pavel Marhoul (Daphne/N2K Group, Czech Republic) & Jan Matějů (Czech Republic). 2. List of contributors Michal Adamec, State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic, Slovakia Michal Ambros, State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic, Slovakia Alexandru Iftime, Natural History Museum „Grigore Antipa”, Romania Barbara Herzig, Säugetiersammlung, Naturhistorisches Museum Vienna, Austria Ilse Hoffmann, University of Vienna, Austria Andrzej Kepel, Polish Society for Nature Conservation ”Salamandra”, Poland Yordan Koshev, Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Science, Bulgaria Denisa Lőbbová, Poznaj a chráň, Slovakia Mirna Mazija, Oikon d.o.o.Institut za primijenjenu ekologiju, Croatia Olivér Váczi, Ministry of Rural Development, Department of Nature Conservation, Hungary Jitka Větrovcová, Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic, Czech Republic Dionisios Youlatos, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece 3. Lifespan of plan/Reviews 2013 - 2023 4. Recommended citation including ISBN Janák M., Marhoul P., Matějů J. 2013. Action Plan for the Conservation of the European Ground Squirrel Spermophilus citellus in the European Union. European Commission. ©2013 European Communities Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged Cover photo: Michal Ambros Acknowledgements for help and support: Ervín
    [Show full text]
  • Balkan Splendor, October 2014
    Jim Gold International Folk Tours A Balkan Journey broadens BALKAN one! SPLENDOR! Folk Dancing, Folk Music, Art, History, Culture, Adventure ! SERBIA, CROATIA, BOSNIA/HERZEGOVINA, MONTENEGRO Belgrade, Novi Sad, Osijek, Djakovo, Sarajevo, Mostar, Kotor, Budva, Dubrovnik October 7-21, 2014 Extension to Dubrovnik October 21-24 Led by Jim Gold and Lee Otterholt i Visit historic Balkan cities, capitals, and folkloric villages. i Meet Serbian, Croatian, Bosnian, and Montenegren folk dancers. i Plus international folk dancing with Lee Otterholt. i Our price includes round-trip airfare, city tours, transfers, hotels, two meals daily, and our own private bus. Itinerary Day 1: Tuesday, October 7: Fly to Belgrade from Newark airport in Newark, New Jersey. Day 2: Wednesday, October 8: Arrival at Belgrade airport. Transfer to your hotel. Welcome dinner! Overnights in Lifedesign Hotel, Belgrade. Day 3: Thursday, October 9: BELGRADE Walking city tour of Belgrade including Dedinje residential district with numerous villas and mansions, Topcider Park, residence of Prince Milos Obrenovic, Josip Broz Tito`s memorial house; Royal Palace, and St. Sava Temple, biggest Orthodox temple on the Balkans. We’ll also see Slavija Square, the Parliament building, and Knez Mihajlova, a pedestrian zone with shops, cafes, and restaurants. Dinner in famous bohemian quarter of Skadarlija. Folk dancing with Lee and local teachers. Day 4: Friday, October 10: BELGRADE – KOVACICA We’ll drive to Kovacica, settled in 1802 by Slovak immigrants moved here by permission of the Empress Maria Theresa, to defend the borders between the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy and Ottoman Empire. During these 210 years of settlement a new Naive Painting was created which in now included in the UNESCO world's heritage list.
    [Show full text]
  • Roadmap Towards the DBS Gateway Region
    Project co-funded by the European Union funds (ERDF, IPA) Roadmap towards the DBS Gateway Region Final Report Vienna, October 2018 WP4 – Regional Action Plan Document Control Sheet Project DBS Gateway Region – regional and Transport Development in the Danube-Black Sea Region towards a Transnational Multiport Gateway Region Code DTP1-050-3.1 Funds ERDF, IPA Document Title Final Report Step II Roadmap + Regional Action Plans Nature Report, Output O4.1 Available Languages English Version 1 Date October 2018 Number of Pages 190 Authors Christina Narval Contributors All partners of the project Checked by LP Approved by SCOM Content 2 WP4 – Regional Action Plan CONTENT 1 Importance of Action – Why a Roadmap? ................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Main challenges ................................................................................................................................. 6 1.2 Danube-Black Sea (DBS) Gateway Region ......................................................................................... 6 1.3 Objectives – Roadmap supporting the Joint Vision 2040 .................................................................. 7 2 Roadmap within the project “DBS Gateway Region” ................................................................................ 9 2.1 Structure of the project ..................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Position of the Roadmap within the project ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • River Cruise for Wine Lovers Uncork Local Traditions, Savor Intense Flavors and Enjoy Palate-Pleasing Adventures During an Amawaterways Wine Cruise
    River Cruise for Wine Lovers Uncork local traditions, savor intense flavors and enjoy palate-pleasing adventures during an AmaWaterways Wine Cruise BUDAPEST, HUNGARY Hosted by: Earl & Hilda For More Information, Contact: Expedia CruiseShipCenters Jones [email protected] (877) 651-7447 CST# 2101270-50 To learn more about our hosts, please see bio on reverse. Gems of Southeast Europe 7-night cruise | March 22-29, 2020 | aboard AmaCerto SAVE UP TO $ CITIES & SIGHTS per500 stateroom Budapest4Mohács4Vukovar4Ilok4Novi Sad4Belgrade Receive free pre-paid gratuties when booked with 4 4 4 4 Iron Gates Vidin Rousse Veliko Tarnovo Giurgiu Expedia CruiseShipCenters - North Bay YOUR JOURNEY ALONG THE LOWER DANUBE RIVER From Budapest to Giurgiu and countless treasures in between, touch history sailing the exotic lower Danube. Medieval towns and grand cities showcase the best of Eastern Europe, while the Danube’s iconic Iron Gate boasts dramatic, narrow gorges and majestic scenery. Wine connoisseurs will taste history in Hungary, Croatia, Serbia, Bulgaria & Romania. Be treated to the flavors, sights, sounds and cultures of this diverse swath of the continent. EXTRA INCLUDED FEATURES ONLY ON WINE CRUISES • Special tours and tastings at local wineries and private cellars • Learn about winemaking in renowned vineyards • Onboard wine pairings with award-winning cuisine • Your wine experts, Earl & Hilda Jones, will lead tastings and discussions Gems of Southeast Europe INCLUDED WITH YOUR FARE Poland • 7 nights deluxe accommodation in river view
    [Show full text]
  • Syntaxonomy and Nomenclatural Adjustments of Steppe-Like Vegetation on Shallow Ultramafic Soils in the Balkans Included in the Order Halacsyetalia Sendtneri
    Tuexenia 36: 293–320. Göttingen 2016. doi: 10.14471/2016.36.016, available online at www.tuexenia.de Syntaxonomy and nomenclatural adjustments of steppe-like vegetation on shallow ultramafic soils in the Balkans included in the order Halacsyetalia sendtneri Syntaxonomisch-nomenklatorische Änderungen bei den Steppenrasen der Ordnung Halacsyetalia sendtneri auf flachgründig-ultramafischen Böden des Balkans Nevena Kuzmanović1, *, Eva Kabaš1, Slobodan Jovanović1, Snežana Vukojičić1, Svetlana Aćić2, Boštjan Surina3, 4 & Dmitar Lakušić1, * 1University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Institute of Botany and Botanical Garden “Jevremovac”, Takovska 43, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia, [email protected]; [email protected]; 2University of Belgrade, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Botany, Nemanjina 6, Belgrade-Zemun, Serbia, [email protected]; 3University of Primorska, Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technologies, Glagoljaška 8, 6000 Koper, Slovenia; 4Natural History Museum Rijeka, Lorenzov prolaz 1, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia *Corresponding authors Abstract Dry open rocky grassland vegetation on shallow ultramafic soils in the Central Balkans represents typical secondary grasslands, which have developed mainly in the zone of thermophilous mixed decid- uous broadleaved and pine forests. Although all relevant national and regional syntaxonomic reviews classify these rocky grasslands within the distinct order Halacsyetalia sendtneri, the syntaxonomic position of the order in different systems of classification has varied in the past. Considering this as well as the fact that there have been no synoptic works on this specific vegetation type, we gathered all available data on the order Halacsyetalia sendtnerii from the serpentinites of the Western and Central Balkan Peninsula for its critical evaluation. The results obtained in our analyses allowed us to propose a new syntaxonomic concept, which is partly in accordance with previously published syntaxonomic schemes.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Bulgarian Government on the Visit to Bulgaria Carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture
    CPT/Inf (2004) 21 Report to the Bulgarian Government on the visit to Bulgaria carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 17 to 26 April 2002 The Bulgarian Government has requested the publication of this report and of its response. The Government's response is set out in document CPT/Inf (2004) 22. Strasbourg, 24 June 2004 - 2 - CONTENTS Copy of the letter transmitting the CPT's report ............................................................................4 I. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................5 A. Dates of the visit and composition of the delegation ..............................................................5 B. Establishments visited...............................................................................................................6 C. Consultations held by the delegation and co-operation encountered...................................7 D. Immediate observations under Article 8, paragraph 5, of the Convention .........................8 II. FACTS FOUND DURING THE VISIT AND ACTION PROPOSED ................................9 A. Establishments under the authority of the Ministry of Internal Affairs .............................9 1. Preliminary remarks ..........................................................................................................9 2. Torture and other forms of ill-treatment..........................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • EMN Ad-Hoc Query on Intra-Schengen Border Monitoring
    EMN Ad-Hoc Query on Intra-Schengen border monitoring and border control Requested by Dylano de Wilde on 4th June 2018 Border Responses from Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Sweden, United Kingdom, Norway (20 in total) Disclaimer: The following responses have been provided primarily for the purpose of information exchange among EMN NCPs in the framework of the EMN. The contributing EMN NCPs have provided, to the best of their knowledge, information that is up-to-date, objective and reliable. Note, however, that the information provided does not necessarily represent the official policy of an EMN NCPs' Member State. Background information: Over the past couple of years, the Schengen area has come to face several challenges. In particular in response to a range of terrorist attacks as well as the so-called European refugee “crisis”. Member states have used a variety of measures to enhance the monitoring of cross border mobility. These measures are not exclusively taken at the external border of the European Union, but also increasingly at the physical borders between two Schengen States. By, for instance, temporarily reintroducing border checks under Article 29 of the Schengen Border Code (SBC) or by using the possibility to carry out police or immigration checks in a region around the physical border under Article 23 SBC. In the light of one of the core principles of the European Union and the Schengen Agreement, the principle of free movement, the temporary introduction of border checks under article 29 SBC is to be seen as a last resort that can only be justified by exceptional circumstances.
    [Show full text]