Evaluation of Antibiotic Tolerance in Pseudomonas Aeruginosa for Aminoglycosides and Its Predicted Gene Regulations Through In-Silico Transcriptomic Analysis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evaluation of Antibiotic Tolerance in Pseudomonas Aeruginosa for Aminoglycosides and Its Predicted Gene Regulations Through In-Silico Transcriptomic Analysis Article Evaluation of Antibiotic Tolerance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa for Aminoglycosides and Its Predicted Gene Regulations through In-Silico Transcriptomic Analysis Abishek Kumar B 1,* , Bency Thankappan 2, Angayarkanni Jayaraman 2,* and Akshita Gupta 1 1 Department of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College (Manipal), Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal 576104, India; [email protected] 2 Department of Microbial Biotechnology, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore 641046, India; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (A.K.B.); [email protected] (A.J.); Tel.: +91-801-521-6350 or +91-908-031-0146 (A.K.B.) Abstract: Pseudomonas aeruginosa causes chronic infections, such as cystic fibrosis, endocarditis, bacteremia, and sepsis, which are life-threatening and difficult to treat. The lack of antibiotic response in P. aeruginosa is due to adaptive resistance mechanism, which prevents the entry of antibiotics into the cytosol of the cell to achieve tolerance. Among the different groups of antibiotics, aminoglycosides are used as a parenteral antibiotic for the treatment of P. aeruginosa. This study aimed to determine the kinetics of antibiotic tolerance and gene expression changes in P. aeruginosa Citation: Kumar B, A.; Thankappan, exposed to amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin. These antibiotics were exposed to P. aeruginosa B.; Jayaraman, A.; Gupta, A. at their MICs and the experimental setup was monitored for 72 h, followed by the measurement Evaluation of Antibiotic Tolerance in of optical density every 12 h. The growth of P. aeruginosa in the MICs of antibiotics represented Pseudomonas aeruginosa for the kinetics of antibiotic tolerance in amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin. The transcriptomic Aminoglycosides and Its Predicted profile of antibiotic exposed P. aeruginosa PA14 was taken from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), Gene Regulations through In-Silico NCBI as microarray datasets. The gene expressions of two datasets were compared by test versus Transcriptomic Analysis. Microbiol. control. Tobramycin-exposed P. aeruginosa failed to develop tolerance in MICs of 0.5 µg/mL, 1 µg/mL, Res. 2021, 12, 630–645. https:// and 1.5 µg/mL, whereas amikacin- and gentamicin-treated P. aeruginosa developed tolerance. This doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres12030045 illustrated the superior in vitro response of tobramycin over gentamicin and amikacin. Further, in Academic Editors: Juan M. Tomás silico transcriptomic analysis of tobramycin-treated P. aeruginosa resulted in differentially expressed and Maria Teresa genes (DEGs), enriched in 16s rRNA methyltransferase E, B, and L, alginate biosynthesis genes, Ceccherini Guicciardini and several proteins of the type II secretion system (T2SS) and type III secretion system (T3SS). The regulation of mucA in alginate biosynthesis, and gidB in RNA methyltransferases, suggested Received: 1 May 2021 an increased antibiotic response and a low probability of developing resistance during tobramycin Accepted: 20 July 2021 treatment. The use of tobramycin as a parenteral antibiotic with its synergistic combination might Published: 29 July 2021 combat P. aeruginosa with increased response. Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral Keywords: adaptive resistance; antibiotic tolerance; in vitro exposure; aminoglycoside; Pseudomonas with regard to jurisdictional claims in aeruginosa; differentially expressed genes (DEGs); transcriptomic analysis published maps and institutional affil- iations. 1. Introduction P. aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen, which causes chronic infections that are Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. difficult to treat due to its limited response to antimicrobials and the emergence of antibiotic Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. resistance during therapy [1]. Multi-drug resistance (MDR) is increasing due to over- This article is an open access article exposure to antibiotics [2]. Drug resistance in P. aeruginosa is developed as a result of distributed under the terms and various physiological and genetic mechanisms, which include multidrug efflux pumps, conditions of the Creative Commons beta-lactamase production, outer membrane protein (porin) loss, and target mutations. Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ In hospitals, MDR P. aeruginosa are, in most cases, concurrently resistant to ciprofloxacin, 4.0/). imipenem, ceftazidime, and piperacillin-tazobactam, which limits treatment options [3]. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 12, 630–645. https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres12030045 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/microbiolres Microbiol. Res. 2021, 12 631 Aminoglycosides are a major group of antibiotics with a potential bacteriocidic effect for the treatment of Pseudomonas infections. They are used in monotherapy or in combina- tion with antimicrobials to treat various infections to overcome drug resistance, particularly in cystic fibrosis patients [4] and infective endocarditis [5]. In the face of systemic infection with septic shock and sepsis, antimicrobial therapy should consist of two antimicrobial agents, with one of these being an aminoglycoside [6], because it exhibits concentration- dependent bactericidal activity and produces prolonged post-antibiotic effects [7]. β-lactam antibiotic coupled with an aminoglycoside is a commonly used synergistic combination for the treatment of clinical infections. Other combinations include fluoro- quinolone and aminoglycosides, and tetracycline and aminoglycosides. Clinical isolates show a high susceptibility to aminoglycosides as compared to other first-line antibiotics [8]. Despite high susceptibility to aminoglycosides in clinical isolates, P. aeruginosa exhibits physiological adaptations to these antibiotics, which results in less response to its synergis- tic combinations. P. aeruginosa thrives in the inhibitory concentration of antibiotics and acquires adaptive resistance gradually, which makes treatment more complicated [9]. The adaptive resistance mechanism is characterized by the modification of the cytoplasmic membrane, condensa- tion of membrane proteins, and the reduction of phospholipid content [10], which reduces penetration of antibiotics into the plasma membrane. Studies show that adaptive resistance can also develop by the up-regulation of efflux pumps, especially MexXY-OprM [11]. Among immunocompromised patients, P. aeruginosa are favored to adapt to the administered antibiotics and enable better survival of the bacterial generation by emerging as physiologically resistant groups [12]. Adaptive resistance is developed due to rapid transcriptomic alteration in response to antibiotics [13]. A better understanding of the kinetics and transcriptomic changes during antibiotic exposure can develop scientific insight on the adaptive resistance mechanism in P. aeruginosa [13,14]. In light of this, our study was designed to gain a better understanding of the adaptive resistance mechanism in P. aeruginosa to the aminoglycosides gentamicin, amikacin, and tobramycin, which are commonly used as first line antibiotics. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Broth Dilution Method The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 was determined by the broth dilution method as per the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. MIC assay was performed for gentamicin, amikacin, and tobramycin (purchased from Sigma Aldrich, Bangalore, Karnataka, India) with log phase culture (5 × 108 CFU/mL) in Mueller Hinton broth (MHB) using a 96-well microtiter plate. ™ The final optical density (OD600) at 600 nm wavelength was determined via an Epoch Microplate spectrophotometer (BioTek Instruments Inc., Winooski, VT, USA). 2.2. In Vitro Exposure of Antibiotics to P. aeruginosa From the observed MICs in the broth dilution method, antibiotic concentrations of 1 µg/mL, 2 µg/mL, and 3 µg/mL for amikacin and 0.5 µg/mL, 1 µg/mL, and 1.5 µg/mL for gentamicin and tobramycin were prepared separately in 10 mL of MHB dispensed in Tarsons tubes. P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 was inoculated and the initial cell density at OD600 was adjusted to =∼ 0.26 uniformly in all the tubes. The experimental set up was observed for 72 h. The experimental condition was incubated at 37 ◦C with optimal shaking at 74 rpm. ™ Every 12 h, the turbidity was monitored by measuring the OD600 in an Epoch microtiter plate reader (BioTek Instruments Inc., Winooski, VT, USA) [14,15]. The tubes with growth were sub-cultured in nutrient agar. The colonies were confirmed for P. aeruginosa through the matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) automated identification system VITEK® MS (BioMérieux, SA, Marcy l’Etoile, France) by following the standard procedure for sample preparation [16]. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 12 632 2.3. In Silico Transcriptomic Analysis 2.3.1. Retrieval of Microarray Datasets The differential gene expression analysis was performed by exploring microarray datasets from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), NCBI. The datasets which mimicked our experimental condition, P. aeruginosa exposed to an MIC of tobramycin, were avail- able as accessible series no. GSE9991 and GSE9989. Two datasets were analyzed: (1) a tobramycin-treated planktonic culture of P. aeruginosa (GSE9991), and (2) a tobramycin- treated P. aeruginosa biofilm (GSE9989). In GSE9991, a planktonic culture of PA14 was exposed to an MIC of tobramycin of 5 µg/mL for 30 min at 37 ◦C[17]. Two samples, GSM252561 and GSM252562, of tobramycin-treated PA14 planktonic culture was taken as a test, which was compared to two controls,
Recommended publications
  • Allosteric Drug Transport Mechanism of Multidrug Transporter Acrb
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24151-3 OPEN Allosteric drug transport mechanism of multidrug transporter AcrB ✉ Heng-Keat Tam 1,3,4 , Wuen Ee Foong 1,4, Christine Oswald1,2, Andrea Herrmann1, Hui Zeng1 & ✉ Klaas M. Pos 1 Gram-negative bacteria maintain an intrinsic resistance mechanism against entry of noxious compounds by utilizing highly efficient efflux pumps. The E. coli AcrAB-TolC drug efflux pump + 1234567890():,; contains the inner membrane H /drug antiporter AcrB comprising three functionally inter- dependent protomers, cycling consecutively through the loose (L), tight (T) and open (O) state during cooperative catalysis. Here, we present 13 X-ray structures of AcrB in inter- mediate states of the transport cycle. Structure-based mutational analysis combined with drug susceptibility assays indicate that drugs are guided through dedicated transport chan- nels toward the drug binding pockets. A co-structure obtained in the combined presence of erythromycin, linezolid, oxacillin and fusidic acid shows binding of fusidic acid deeply inside the T protomer transmembrane domain. Thiol cross-link substrate protection assays indicate that this transmembrane domain-binding site can also accommodate oxacillin or novobiocin but not erythromycin or linezolid. AcrB-mediated drug transport is suggested to be allos- terically modulated in presence of multiple drugs. 1 Institute of Biochemistry, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 2 Sosei Heptares, Steinmetz Building, Granta Park, Great Abington, Cambridge, UK. 3Present
    [Show full text]
  • Antibacterial Drug Usage Analysis
    Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology Drug Use Review Date: April 5, 2012 To: Edward Cox, M.D. Director Office of Antimicrobial Products Through: Gerald Dal Pan, M.D., MHS Director Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology Laura Governale, Pharm.D., MBA Deputy Director for Drug Use Division of Epidemiology II Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology Hina Mehta, Pharm.D. Drug Use Data Analysis Team Leader Division of Epidemiology II Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology From: Tracy Pham, Pharm.D. Drug Use Data Analyst Division of Epidemiology II Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology Drug Name(s): Systemic Antibacterial Drug Products Application Type/Number: Multiple Applicant/sponsor: Multiple OSE RCM #: 2012-544 **This document contains proprietary drug use data obtained by FDA under contract. The drug use data/information in this document has been cleared for public release.** 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Division of Epidemiology II is providing an update of the drug utilization data in terms of number of kilograms or international units of selected systemic antibacterial drug products sold from manufacturers to various retail and non-retail channels of distribution for years 2010-2011 as a surrogate for nationwide antibacterial drug use in humans. Propriety drug use databases licensed by the FDA were used to conduct this analysis. Data findings are as follows: During years 2010 and 2011, the majority of kilograms of selected systemic antibacterial drug products sold were to outpatient retail pharmacy settings. Approximately 3.28 million kilograms of selected systemic antibacterial drug products were sold during year 2010, and around 3.29 million kilograms were sold during year 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • WHO Report on Surveillance of Antibiotic Consumption: 2016-2018 Early Implementation ISBN 978-92-4-151488-0 © World Health Organization 2018 Some Rights Reserved
    WHO Report on Surveillance of Antibiotic Consumption 2016-2018 Early implementation WHO Report on Surveillance of Antibiotic Consumption 2016 - 2018 Early implementation WHO report on surveillance of antibiotic consumption: 2016-2018 early implementation ISBN 978-92-4-151488-0 © World Health Organization 2018 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non- commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization. Suggested citation. WHO report on surveillance of antibiotic consumption: 2016-2018 early implementation. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) data.
    [Show full text]
  • Intracellular Penetration and Effects of Antibiotics On
    antibiotics Review Intracellular Penetration and Effects of Antibiotics on Staphylococcus aureus Inside Human Neutrophils: A Comprehensive Review Suzanne Bongers 1 , Pien Hellebrekers 1,2 , Luke P.H. Leenen 1, Leo Koenderman 2,3 and Falco Hietbrink 1,* 1 Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; [email protected] (S.B.); [email protected] (P.H.); [email protected] (L.P.H.L.) 2 Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; [email protected] 3 Department of Pulmonology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 6 April 2019; Accepted: 2 May 2019; Published: 4 May 2019 Abstract: Neutrophils are important assets in defense against invading bacteria like staphylococci. However, (dysfunctioning) neutrophils can also serve as reservoir for pathogens that are able to survive inside the cellular environment. Staphylococcus aureus is a notorious facultative intracellular pathogen. Most vulnerable for neutrophil dysfunction and intracellular infection are immune-deficient patients or, as has recently been described, severely injured patients. These dysfunctional neutrophils can become hide-out spots or “Trojan horses” for S. aureus. This location offers protection to bacteria from most antibiotics and allows transportation of bacteria throughout the body inside moving neutrophils. When neutrophils die, these bacteria are released at different locations. In this review, we therefore focus on the capacity of several groups of antibiotics to enter human neutrophils, kill intracellular S. aureus and affect neutrophil function. We provide an overview of intracellular capacity of available antibiotics to aid in clinical decision making.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption in Europe 2013-2014 SURVEILLANCE REPORT
    SURVEILLANCE REPORT SURVEILLANCE REPORT Surveillance of antimicrobial consumption in Europe in Europe consumption of antimicrobial Surveillance Surveillance of antimicrobial consumption in Europe 2013-2014 2012 www.ecdc.europa.eu ECDC SURVEILLANCE REPORT Surveillance of antimicrobial consumption in Europe 2013–2014 This report of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) was coordinated by Klaus Weist. Contributing authors Klaus Weist, Arno Muller, Ana Hoxha, Vera Vlahović-Palčevski, Christelle Elias, Dominique Monnet and Ole Heuer. Data analysis: Klaus Weist, Arno Muller and Ana Hoxha. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the ESAC-Net Disease Network Coordination Committee members (Marcel Bruch, Philippe Cavalié, Herman Goossens, Jenny Hellman, Susan Hopkins, Stephanie Natsch, Anna Olczak-Pienkowska, Ajay Oza, Arjana Tambić Andrasevic, Peter Zarb) and observers (Jane Robertson, Arno Muller, Mike Sharland, Theo Verheij) for providing valuable comments and scientific advice during the production of the report. All ESAC-Net participants and National Coordinators are acknowledged for providing data and valuable comments on this report. The authors also acknowledge Gaetan Guyodo, Catalin Albu and Anna Renau-Rosell for managing the data and providing technical support to the participating countries. Suggested citation: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Surveillance of antimicrobial consumption in Europe, 2013‒2014. Stockholm: ECDC; 2018. Stockholm, May 2018 ISBN 978-92-9498-187-5 ISSN 2315-0955
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Medication Tables
    Appendix C Medication Tables Note: The medication tables are not meant to be inclusive lists of all available therapeutic agents. Approved medication tables will be updated regularly. Discrepancies must be reported. See Resource Section of this manual for additional contact information. Release Notes: Aspirin Table Version 1.0 Table 1.1 Aspirin and Aspirin-Containing Medications Acetylsalicylic Acid Acuprin 81 Alka-Seltzer Alka-Seltzer Morning Relief Anacin Arthritis Foundation Aspirin Arthritis Pain Ascriptin Arthritis Pain Formula ASA ASA Baby ASA Baby Chewable ASA Baby Coated ASA Bayer ASA Bayer Children's ASA Buffered ASA Children's ASA EC ASA Enteric Coated ASA/Maalox Ascriptin Aspergum Aspir-10 Aspir-Low Aspir-Lox Aspir-Mox Aspir-Trin Aspirbuf Aspircaf Aspirin Aspirin Baby Aspirin Bayer Aspirin Bayer Children's Aspirin Buffered Aspirin Child Aspirin Child Chewable Aspirin Children's Aspirin EC Aspirin Enteric Coated Specifications Manual for National Appendix C-1 Hospital Quality Measures Table 1.1 Aspirin and Aspirin-Containing Medications (continued) Aspirin Litecoat Aspirin Lo-Dose Aspirin Low Strength Aspirin Tri-Buffered Aspirin, Extended Release Aspirin/butalbital/caffeine Aspirin/caffeine Aspirin/pravachol Aspirin/pravastatin Aspirtab Bayer Aspirin Bayer Aspirin PM Extra Strength Bayer Children’s Bayer EC Bayer Enteric Coated Bayer Low Strength Bayer Plus Buffered ASA Buffered Aspirin Buffered Baby ASA Bufferin Bufferin Arthritis Strength Bufferin Extra Strength Buffex Cama Arthritis Reliever Child’s Aspirin Coated Aspirin
    [Show full text]
  • Azithromycin Treatment Failure in Macrolide-Resistant Mycoplasma Pneumoniae Pneumonia
    Correspondence: M. Haschke, Division of Clinical Pharmaco- 3 George JN, Raskob GE, Shah SR, et al. Drug-induced thrombocyto- logy and Toxicology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben penia: a systematic review of published case reports. Ann Int Med 1998; 129: 886–890. 4, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland. E-mail: [email protected] 4 Lee SH, Rubin LJ. Current treatment strategies for pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Intern Med 2005; 258: 199–215. Statement of Interest: None declared. 5 US Food and Drug Administration. Ventavis (iloprost) inhalation solution September 2008. MedWatch FDA Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting Program. Date last updated: June 19, 2009. Date last accessed: December 1, 2009. REFERENCES 6 Uppsala Monitoring Centre World Health Organization collaborat- 1 Von Drygalski A, Curtis BR, Bougie DW, et al. Vancomycin- TM ing Centre for International Drug Monitoring. VigiBase Services. induced immune thrombocytopenia. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: www.umc-products.com Date last accessed: December 1, 2009. 904–910. 7 Chin KM, Channick RN, de Lemos JA, et al. Hemodynamics and 2 Documed. Product information dobutamine injection. Arzbeunuttel epoprostenol use are associated with thrombocytopenia in pulmon- Kompendium der Schweiz. [Swiss Compendium of Therapeutic ary arterial hypertension. Chest 2009; 135: 130–136. Drugs.] www.documed.ch Date last updated: 2005. Date last accessed: December 1, 2009. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00011010 Azithromycin treatment failure in macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia To the Editors: azithromycin (500 mg once daily) and oseltamivir (75 mg twice daily) were added as treatment for CAP. RT-PCR of Mycoplasma pneumoniae is one of the most common bacterial nasopharyngeal aspirate for influenza, collected 1 day before causes of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report on Antimicrobials Dispensed in Public Hospitals
    Summary Report on Antimicrobials Dispensed in Public Hospitals Year 2014 - 2016 Infection Control Branch Centre for Health Protection Department of Health October 2019 (Version as at 08 October 2019) Summary Report on Antimicrobial Dispensed CONTENTS in Public Hospitals (2014 - 2016) Contents Executive Summary i 1 Introduction 1 2 Background 1 2.1 Healthcare system of Hong Kong ......................... 2 3 Data Sources and Methodology 2 3.1 Data sources .................................... 2 3.2 Methodology ................................... 3 3.3 Antimicrobial names ............................... 4 4 Results 5 4.1 Overall annual dispensed quantities and percentage changes in all HA services . 5 4.1.1 Five most dispensed antimicrobial groups in all HA services . 5 4.1.2 Ten most dispensed antimicrobials in all HA services . 6 4.2 Overall annual dispensed quantities and percentage changes in HA non-inpatient service ....................................... 8 4.2.1 Five most dispensed antimicrobial groups in HA non-inpatient service . 10 4.2.2 Ten most dispensed antimicrobials in HA non-inpatient service . 10 4.2.3 Antimicrobial dispensed in HA non-inpatient service, stratified by service type ................................ 11 4.3 Overall annual dispensed quantities and percentage changes in HA inpatient service ....................................... 12 4.3.1 Five most dispensed antimicrobial groups in HA inpatient service . 13 4.3.2 Ten most dispensed antimicrobials in HA inpatient service . 14 4.3.3 Ten most dispensed antimicrobials in HA inpatient service, stratified by specialty ................................. 15 4.4 Overall annual dispensed quantities and percentage change of locally-important broad-spectrum antimicrobials in all HA services . 16 4.4.1 Locally-important broad-spectrum antimicrobial dispensed in HA inpatient service, stratified by specialty .
    [Show full text]
  • WHO Report on Surveillance of Antibiotic Consumption: 2016-2018 Early Implementation ISBN 978-92-4-151488-0 © World Health Organization 2018 Some Rights Reserved
    WHO Report on Surveillance of Antibiotic Consumption 2016-2018 Early implementation WHO Report on Surveillance of Antibiotic Consumption 2016 - 2018 Early implementation WHO report on surveillance of antibiotic consumption: 2016-2018 early implementation ISBN 978-92-4-151488-0 © World Health Organization 2018 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non- commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization. Suggested citation. WHO report on surveillance of antibiotic consumption: 2016-2018 early implementation. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) data.
    [Show full text]
  • Antibiotic Classes
    Penicillins Aminoglycosides Generic Brand Name Generic Brand Name Amoxicillin Amoxil, Polymox, Trimox, Wymox Amikacin Amikin Ampicillin Omnipen, Polycillin, Polycillin-N, Gentamicin Garamycin, G-Mycin, Jenamicin Principen, Totacillin, Unasyn Kanamycin Kantrex Bacampicillin Spectrobid Neomycin Mycifradin, Myciguent Carbenicillin Geocillin, Geopen Netilmicin Netromycin Cloxacillin Cloxapen Paromomycin Dicloxacillin Dynapen, Dycill, Pathocil Streptomycin Flucloxacillin Flopen, Floxapen, Staphcillin Tobramycin Nebcin Mezlocillin Mezlin Nafcillin Nafcil, Nallpen, Unipen Quinolones Oxacillin Bactocill, Prostaphlin Generic Brand Name Penicillin G Bicillin L-A, First Generation Crysticillin 300 A.S., Pentids, Flumequine Flubactin Permapen, Pfizerpen, Pfizerpen- Nalidixic acid NegGam, Wintomylon AS, Wycillin Oxolinic acid Uroxin Penicillin V Beepen-VK, Betapen-VK, Piromidic acid Panacid Ledercillin VK, V-Cillin K Pipemidic acid Dolcol Piperacillin Pipracil, Zosyn Rosoxacin Eradacil Pivampicillin Second Generation Pivmecillinam Ciprofloxacin Cipro, Cipro XR, Ciprobay, Ciproxin Ticarcillin Ticar Enoxacin Enroxil, Penetrex Lomefloxacin Maxaquin Monobactams Nadifloxacin Acuatim, Nadoxin, Nadixa Generic Brand Name Norfloxacin Lexinor, Noroxin, Quinabic, Aztreonam Azactam, Cayston Janacin Ofloxacin Floxin, Oxaldin, Tarivid Carbapenems Pefloxacin Peflacine Generic Brand Name Rufloxacin Uroflox Imipenem, Primaxin Third Generation Imipenem/cilastatin Balofloxacin Baloxin Doripenem Doribax Gatifloxacin Tequin, Zymar Meropenem Merrem Grepafloxacin Raxar Ertapenem
    [Show full text]
  • Common Study Protocol for Observational Database Studies WP5 – Analytic Database Studies
    Arrhythmogenic potential of drugs FP7-HEALTH-241679 http://www.aritmo-project.org/ Common Study Protocol for Observational Database Studies WP5 – Analytic Database Studies V 1.3 Draft Lead beneficiary: EMC Date: 03/01/2010 Nature: Report Dissemination level: D5.2 Report on Common Study Protocol for Observational Database Studies WP5: Conduct of Additional Observational Security: Studies. Author(s): Gianluca Trifiro’ (EMC), Giampiero Version: v1.1– 2/85 Mazzaglia (F-SIMG) Draft TABLE OF CONTENTS DOCUMENT INFOOMATION AND HISTORY ...........................................................................4 DEFINITIONS .................................................... ERRORE. IL SEGNALIBRO NON È DEFINITO. ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................................6 1. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................7 2. STUDY OBJECTIVES................................ ERRORE. IL SEGNALIBRO NON È DEFINITO. 3. METHODS ..........................................................................................................................8 3.1.STUDY DESIGN ....................................................................................................................8 3.2.DATA SOURCES ..................................................................................................................9 3.2.1. IPCI Database .....................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence Review
    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Draft for consultation Secondary bacterial infection of common skin conditions, including eczema: antimicrobial prescribing guideline Evidence review August 2020 Draft for consultation DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION Contents Disclaimer The recommendations in this guideline represent the view of NICE, arrived at after careful consideration of the evidence available. When exercising their judgement, professionals are expected to take this guideline fully into account, alongside the individual needs, preferences and values of their patients or service users. The recommendations in this guideline are not mandatory and the guideline does not override the responsibility of healthcare professionals to make decisions appropriate to the circumstances of the individual patient, in consultation with the patient and/or their carer or guardian. Local commissioners and/or providers have a responsibility to enable the guideline to be applied when individual health professionals and their patients or service users wish to use it. They should do so in the context of local and national priorities for funding and developing services, and in light of their duties to have due regard to the need to eliminate unlawful discrimination, to advance equality of opportunity and to reduce health inequalities. Nothing in this guideline should be interpreted in a way that would be inconsistent with compliance with those duties. NICE guidelines cover health and care in England. Decisions on how they apply in other UK countries are made by ministers in the Welsh Government, Scottish Government, and Northern Ireland Executive. All NICE guidance is subject to regular review and may be updated or withdrawn. Copyright © NICE 2020.
    [Show full text]