The Influences of Microbial Diversity on Carbonate Geochemistry Across a Transition from Fresh to Saline Water in the Edwards Aquifer, Texas
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2010 The nflueI nces of Microbial Diversity on Carbonate Geochemistry Across a Transition from Fresh to Saline Water in the Edwards Aquifer, Texas Cassie Jo Gray Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Gray, Cassie Jo, "The nflueI nces of Microbial Diversity on Carbonate Geochemistry Across a Transition from Fresh to Saline Water in the Edwards Aquifer, Texas" (2010). LSU Master's Theses. 4268. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/4268 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE INFLUENCES OF MICROBIAL DIVERSITY ON CARBONATE GEOCHEMISTRY ACROSS A TRANSITION FROM FRESH TO SALINE WATER IN THE EDWARDS AQUIFER, TEXAS A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The Department of Geology and Geophysics by Cassie Jo Gray B.S., Indiana State University, 2008 May 2010 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to extend my utmost gratitude to my advisor, Dr. Annette Engel, for sharing her passion and knowledge of geomicrobiology, and for her patience and tough love throughout this learning and growing experience. Thanks also to my other committee members, Dr. Carol Wicks and Dr. Huiming Bao, for their insightful input into my research. Thanks to Gary Schindel and the Edwards Aquifer Authority for their permission to access the study wells. I would like to acknowledge Brendan Headd and Scott Engel for their tremendous assistance in the field, especially for help stringing the microcosms and tying knots. Thanks also to the laboratory assistants, Brendan Donnelly and Skylar White, for all their time spent on specs, gels, and mini-preps. Personal thanks are due to Issaku Kohl for his time spent helping with the IC, and to Dr. Xiaogang Xie for his assistance with the SEM. Many thanks to those family members and friends who have supported me throughout the years and encouraged me to pursue my education, even if hundreds of miles away. Thanks to the geologists at Indiana State University for providing all the opportunities that allowed me to get to where I am, and those at Louisiana State University for this wonderful two-year experience. Finally, I am forever indebted to Tara Ewer, a true friend whom encouraged me to be something in life and reach for something better before I realized I needed it. Don’t let your…sparkle fade away. Funding for this research was provided by the Louisiana Board of Regents, American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG) Edward B. Picou Grant, Karst Waters Institute (KWI) William L. Wilson Scholarship, and the LSU Department of Geology and Geophysics. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………………….……...ii LIST OF TABLES……………………………………………………………………….….…v LIST OF FIGURES…………………………………………………………………………...vi ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………………………viii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION……………………………………………….………….…….1 The Edwards Aquifer………………………………………….………….……1 Karstification Processes…………………….………………………………….6 Subsurface Microorganisms………………….…………………………….…..9 Research Objectives…………………………….…………………………….11 Study Area………………………………………….…………………………12 Significance of Research……………………………….……………………..12 Thesis Organization……………………………………….,…………………14 2 MICROBIOLOGY ACROSS THE TRANSITION FROM FRESH TO SALINE WATER IN THE EDWARDS AQUIFER………………….…….16 Introduction…………………………………………………………….……..16 Materials and Methods………………………………………………….…….16 Results………………………………………………………………………...18 Discussion…………………………………………………………………….25 3 GEOCHEMISTRY ACROSS THE TRANSITION FROM FRESH TO SALINE WATER IN THE EDWARDS AQUIFER………………………...37 Introduction…………………………………………………………………...37 Materials and Methods………………………………………………………..37 Results………………………………………………………………………...39 Discussion……………………………………………………………........….43 4 GEOCHEMICAL AND MICROBIAL INFLUENCES ON EDWARDS AQUIFER CARBONATES………………………………………..50 Introduction…………………………………………………………………...50 Materials and Methods………………………………………………………..50 Results………………………………………………………………………...53 Discussion…………………………………………………………………….59 5 SUMMARY AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS……………………………………69 REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………………….74 iii APPENDIX A OPERATIONAL TAXONOMIC UNITS (OTUs)……………………………...85 B SEM IMAGES………………………………………………………………….92 VITA………………………………………………………………………………………...118 iv LIST OF TABLES 2.1 Distribution of major class or phylum-level taxonomy of 16S rRNA gene bacterial sequences from clones retrieved from transect wells in New Braunfels, Texas ………………………………………………………………19 3.1 Geochemical results from the first sampling of Comal Springs and transect study wells, New Braunfels, Texas...................................................................40 3.2 Geochemical results from the second sampling of Comal Springs and transect study wells, New Braunfels, Texas…………………………….......................41 4.1 Well depths, diameters, screened intervals, and microcosm suspension depths….……51 4.2 Average mass loss from calcite and dolomite microcosms and associated significance ……………………………………………………………54 v LIST OF FIGURES 1.1 The Edwards Aquifer in central Texas………………………………………………..…2 1.2 Generalized stratigraphic column of the Edwards Aquifer and associated units in the San Marcos Platform………………………………………………….…….3 1.3 (A) Map of the New Braunfels transect study wells and (B) the corresponding geologic cross section…..……………………………………………………………...13 2.1 Distribution of major classes and phyla in transect wells, in order of increasing salinity (from left to right)………………………………………………….20 2.2 Rarefaction curves for all 16S rRNA gene sequences retrieved from Edwards Aquifer study wells…………………………………………………………..21 2.3 Trees relating environmental microbial samples using hierarchical clustering analysis in UniFrac………………………………………………………….24 2.4 Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCA) obtained from UniFrac………………………...26 3.1 Piper diagrams showing the hydrochemical facies of transect study wells from (A) the first sampling and (B) second sampling…………………………………42 3.2 Chemical parameters…………………………………………………………………...44 - 3.3 Concentrations of HCO3 versus (A) [Ca], (B) [Ca+Mg], and (C) [Ca+Mg]-[SO4]…………………………………………………………………….45 3.4 Saturation indices (log IAP/Ksp) of (A) calcite, (B) dolomite, and (C) gypsum versus sulfate concentrations……………………………………………..46 3.5 Speciation of (A) [Ca] and (B) [Mg] in transect wells based on complexes modeled in PHREEQC…………………………………………………….47 4.1 Mass lost for reactive and sterile (A) calcite microcosms and (B) dolomite microcosms……...….……………………………………………….55 4.2 Average mass loss (mg) versus calcite saturation index values for each well…………56 4.3 Surficial features of mineral control chips……………………………………………..56 4.4 Cellular morphology and behavior…………………………………………………….58 4.5 Cell-surface associations………………………………………………………………58 vi 4.6 Dissolution features…………………………………………………………………….60 4.7 Secondary precipitates on experimental mineral surfaces……………………………..61 4.8 EDAX spectra for (A) iron sulfide mineral and (B) silica-bearing mineral…………...62 4.9 Number of putative cells observed on reactive calcite and dolomite chips per examined chip area (0.0625 mm2)…………………………………62 4.10 Average amount of mass loss (mg) versus the total average number of cells per microcosm………………………………………………………...63 vii ABSTRACT Microbially-mediated karstification through the production of metabolic byproducts has been well-documented in cave environments, but less is known about deep karstic settings. This research aimed to distinguish between microbial and geochemical influences on carbonate dissolution in the Edwards Aquifer, a prolific karst aquifer in central Texas, specifically from a transect of six wells across a transition from fresh to saline water in New Braunfels. For the first time, a portion of the aquifer’s bacterial diversity was examined from molecular 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses, which revealed that Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, and Betaproteobacteria dominated the aquifer, with rare Bacteroidetes, Nitrospirae, and Firmicutes taxonomic groups. Local geochemical conditions for each well (H2S levels, TDS, and depth) accounted for ~83% of the genetic variability among wells. In general, putative chemoorganotrophic microorganisms were prevalent in all wells, but chemolithoautotrophs associated with sulfur oxidation were prevalent only in sulfidic wells. Sterile and reactive in situ microcosms containing experimental calcite and dolomite fragments were deployed in the transect wells for ~1 month. Most of the mineral fragments in the microcosms (~64%) had statistically significant mass loss, although fluids were saturated with respect to calcite (SI= +0.6 to +0.14) and dolomite (SI= +0.18 to +0.43). There was greater mass loss in reactive microcosms having higher surface cell densities on colonized mineral surfaces. These results suggest that microbial colonization establishes geochemical disequilibrium between mineral surfaces and bulk aquifer fluids, regardless of the metabolic potential of the microorganisms. Microbially-mediated carbonate dissolution is possible in both fresh and