DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Comments (PDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Public Comments (PDF) 1 PENOBSCOT EAST RESOURCE CENTER 43 School Street, P. O. Box 27, Stonington, Maine 04681 [email protected] Colonel Philip T. Feir, U. S. Army August 8, 2010 Co-Chair International St. Croix River Watershed Board 696 Virginia Road Concord, MA 01742-2751 Dear Colonel Feir; Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Adaptive Management Plan for Managing Alewife in the St. Croix River Watershed, between the U. S. and Canada. Maine commercial fisherman and Penobscot East Resource Center urge the IJC to use its authority to require that alewives and other anadromous species be given free passage to their spawning areas in the St. Croix River Watershed once again. Scientific studies indicate a restored St Croix watershed will produce annual runs of 24 million river herring. Many examples have been cited where sea-run alewives are compatible with and often enhance smallmouth bass populations as their prey and by providing nutrients essential for producing healthy plankton populations. Opening the St Croix watershed fishways offers significant economic benefits for all the communities in this economically depressed area. A restored alewive spawning population of 24 million fish, each weighing approximately 1 lb/adult fish and with a sustainable capture rate of 80% would provide a fishery of approximately 20 million lbs/year. Using the current price of $25 for a 70 lb bushel for lobster bait, the fishery could easily generate over $7 million dollars of income to Washington County and New Brunswick. In addition, it would provide new recreational fisheries for striped bass and shad to further augment the income of guides and lodges. These benefits would be gained simply by allowing anadromous fish access to their spawning grounds. Perhaps the greatest potential benefits reopening the St. Croix offers is the ecological restoration of depleted marine fish stocks in the Bay of Fundy and eastern Gulf of Maine. Recent and historical studies indicate that adult alewives are important prey for groundfish such as cod and pollock and attract these groundfish species to coastal waters. Juvenile alewives leaving fresh water spend their first year near their natal river and are an important source of local prey for marine species. Opening the St Croix fish ladders could reverse the precipitous decline of both river herring and groundfish and help restore these valuable fisheries for Maine and New Brunswick fishermen. Unfortunately, the proposed adaptive plan fails to provide a timely restoration for any depleted anadromous native species. To accomplish that, the proposed plan should address the following deficiencies: 2 1. The entire watershed needs to be opened to river herring. At the same time, Spednic Lake needs to be rigorously monitored for any changes that may occur. 2. The linkage between adjusting alewife recovery to the status of the smallmouth bass stock has no scientific basis for being included in the restoration plan. It creates the absurdity of linking the annual landings of a very abundant but unrelated exotic species (smallmouth bass) to determine whether several seriously depleted native species (including alewives, bluebacks, shad, eels, and sturgeon) should be permitted to recover. It must be eliminated. 3. Limiting the recovery of this valuable fish to six alewives per acre is equally unjustifiable. Restoration will require the numbers of alewives per acre to be increased to that used in other river systems. Instead of six fish per acre, it should be increased to 236 fish per acre, of which 200 fish could be caught and sold. 4. The proposed plan suggests its implementation will add but 10 years to the recovery of river herring. In actuality, the plan provides mechanisms that prevent recovery and perpetuate the depleted status quo. Maine fishermen and lobstermen acknowledge the concerns that recreational fishermen and registered guides have for their smallmouth bass fishery, even though it is a non- native species. But strangling the St. Croix watershed is seriously damaging our anadromous and marine fisheries and closure of its fishways should not be allowed to continue. We depend on alewives for bait and the marine ecosystem depends on alewives for prey. Anadromous fish and groundfish in eastern GOM are depleted and need to be restored. Opening the St. Croix system is a good first step in that restoration. Approving the proposed Adaptive Management Plan for Managing Alewife in the St. Croix River Watershed will only perpetuate the serious damage being done to our marine fisheries. We urge the IJC to reopen fishways throughout the St. Croix watershed and allow both the biological communities and the towns within the watershed to benefit from its productivity. We look forward to equity by your inclusion of these adjustments to the plan. Respectfully, Edward P. Ames Retired Fisherman, Stonington Fisheries Alliance MacArthur Fellow and Bowdoin Coastal Studies Scholar Penobscot East Resource Center Stonington, ME 04681 Philip T. Feir Bill Appleby Colonel, U. S. Army Director, MSC Operations-Atlantic U. S. Co-Chair Canadian Co-Chair International St. Croix River Watershed Board International St. Croix River Watershed Board 696 Virginia Road 45 Alderney Drive Concord, MA 01742-2751 Dartmouth, NS B2Y 2N6 5 August 2010 Dear Colonel Feir and Director Appleby, I appreciate the opportunity to provide comments regarding the draft of “An Adaptive Management Plan for Managing Alewife in the St. Croix River Watershed, Maine and New Brunswick.” Alewife is an ecologically important species to the St. Croix River and adjacent region, being a critical food source for many birds and other fish species that inhabit the river ecosystem. Alewife is also eaten by many marine species including commercially important finfish like Atlantic Cod, Hake and Pollock; some of these finfish species have very low abundance. Many coastal communities in Maine and New Brunswick rely on commercial fishing for employment, so successful management of a prey species is essential for healthy fisheries and economic viability of fishing communities. Commercial fishing also occurs for Alewife, and if populations and associated ecosystems were managed successfully, the fishery could expand to employ more people and generate higher profits for the region. It is therefore alarming that the proposed management of the St. Croix River Watershed is aimed more towards the non-native smallmouth bass, apparently because of non-scientific concerns regarding competition with Alewife. It is important for the ecological and economical health of the region that management decisions are based on science. It is therefore important to fully open the St. Croix River Watershed for unrestricted passage of Alewife. Yours truly, Alan Duckworth, PhD Research Scientist Blue Ocean Institute 250 Lawrence Hill Road Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724 Phone: 631 632 3763 or 631 659 3746 Email: [email protected] Web: www.blueocean.org Alewife Restoration Full Name: Alan R. Kane City: Gouldsboro State / Province: Maine My reaction to the plan you propose is simple. I am deeply disappointed that the input of the guides takes precedent over all the other people directly or indirectly affected by the decline of alewives. Inland fisheries and those offshore are both greatly affected by their decline. The alewives are critical as a valuable member of the food chain for species too numerous to name. The lack of baitfish for lobstering alone should weigh equally to the guides needs. That is but a small issue compared to the importance of alewives to so many. To add insult to the entire issue of preventing alewives from interfering with the bass fishery, they are in complete error in their theory and science. The only place I have even heard of alewives affecting bass is in the St. Croix! I can not find other examples. You need go no farther than the East Machias watershed to disprove this, as they have a healthy alewife run that survives with numerous great bass fishing areas. Keep going and you find that is the situation everywhere. I have heard of the theory that alewives will damage the other fisheries, yet I have yet to witness that the restoration of them caused any fishery decline. I have heard of just the opposite. Many skeptics have changed their viewpoint and seen them as beneficial. I think the same results would occur in the St. Croix. Mother Nature has created some good plans and as a result produced many a healthy fishery. To think we need to create an artificial boundary to keep a non native species flourishing borders on the insane. I don't want to take away the guides work, in fact I am all for seeing them thrive in their livelihoods. Preventing and inhibiting alewife restoration is not the answer. Restoring balance and ecological diversity in the region most assuredly will. Exclusion of alewives Full Name: Alex Mendelsohn City: Kennebunk State / Province: Maine Dear Commissioners: The exclusion of alewives from their habitat in the St. Croix River watershed has been a grave ecological injustice. Your draft plan for restoring alewives to the St. Croix improves upon the current situation, but your plan needs to be stronger and must allow for alewives to have access to their full historic range in the St. Croix watershed. Your draft plan fails to consider alewives in their broader ecological and economic context and it places them at a lower level of importance than the non-native smallmouth bass. Alewives are fundamental to the health of our rivers, lakes, estuaries, and ocean, providing food for everything from eagles and osprey to whales and cod. Alewives bring important marine-derived nutrients to our inland waters and they feed valuable recreational and commercial fish stocks in the Gulf of Maine. The draft management plan is seriously flawed. The St. Croix River has the potential to produce a self-sustaining run of more than 20 million alewives, yet your plan could potentially limit alewives to a mere fraction of this.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Section 5-2 Androscoggin River (Friends of Merrymeeting Bay)
    Maine Department of Environmental Protection Androscoggin River (FOMB) 2018 Summary Data Report Section 5-2 Androscoggin River (Friends of Merrymeeting Bay) Androscoggin River The Androscoggin River is the third largest river in the state of Maine. It has a length of 177 miles and drainage area of 3,450 square miles (2,730 sq. mi. in Maine).1 The Androscoggin River’s headwaters are Umbagog Lake in Maine/New Hampshire. From there it flows into New Hampshire and then back into Maine through the towns of Gilead and Bethel. It continues flowing through the towns and cities of Rumford, Mexico, Dixfield, Jay, Livermore Falls, Lewiston, Auburn, Lisbon, Lisbon Falls, Durham, Brunswick, and Topsham where it joins the Kennebec River at Merrymeeting Bay. The Androscoggin River has a long history of industrial and municipal use over the last 200 years.1 Beginning in the early 1800s, many dams were constructed for mills, primarily in the lower part of the river. By the late 1800s, many textile and lumber mills were in operation, mostly from Lewiston to Brunswick. Pulp and paper mills that are still in operation today were established in the late 1800s in New Hampshire, Rumford, and Jay. Beginning in the late 1920s, Central Maine Power built hydroelectric dams that impounded much of the river from Lewiston to Livermore Falls. Some of these uses continue today. “Along its course to the sea, the river is repeatedly dammed. It receives discharges from industrial and municipal sources, as well as polluted runoff from a variety of sources.”2 Specific problems include mill discharges, combined sewer overflows (CSOs), dam impacts (28 dams exist), and historical sediment toxins.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Frequency Analyses for New Brunswick Rivers Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2920
    Flood Frequency Analyses for New Brunswick Rivers Aucoin, F., D. Caissie, N. El-Jabi and N. Turkkan Department of Fisheries and Oceans Gulf Region Oceans and Science Branch Diadromous Fish Section P.O. Box 5030, Moncton, NB, E1C 9B6 2011 Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2920 Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Technical reports contain scientific and technical information that contributes to existing knowledge but which is not normally appropriate for primary literature. Technical reports are directed primarily toward a worldwide audience and have an international distribution. No restriction is placed on subject matter and the series reflects the broad interests and policies of Fisheries and Oceans, namely, fisheries and aquatic sciences. Technical reports may be cited as full publications. The correct citation appears above the abstract of each report. Each report is abstracted in the data base Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts. Technical reports are produced regionally but are numbered nationally. Requests for individual reports will be filled by the issuing establishment listed on the front cover and title page. Numbers 1-456 in this series were issued as Technical Reports of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. Numbers 457-714 were issued as Department of the Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service, Research and Development Directorate Technical Reports. Numbers 715-924 were issued as Department of Fisheries and Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service Technical Reports. The current series name was changed with report number 925. Rapport technique canadien des sciences halieutiques et aquatiques Les rapports techniques contiennent des renseignements scientifiques et techniques qui constituent une contribution aux connaissances actuelles, mais qui ne sont pas normalement appropriés pour la publication dans un journal scientifique.
    [Show full text]
  • Kennebec Estuary Focus Areas of Statewide Ecological Significance Kennebec Estuary
    Focus Areas of Statewide Ecological Significance: Kennebec Estuary Focus Areas of Statewide Ecological Significance Kennebec Estuary WHY IS THIS AREA SIGNIFICANT? The Kennebec Estuary Focus Area contains more than 20 percent of Maine’s tidal marshes, a significant percentage of Maine’s sandy beach and associated dune Biophysical Region habitats, and globally rare pitch pine • Central Maine Embayment woodland communities. More than two • Cacso Bay Coast dozen rare plant species inhabit the area’s diverse natural communities. Numerous imperiled species of animals have been documented in the Focus Area, and it contains some of the state’s best habitat for bald eagles. OPPORTUNITIES FOR CONSERVATION » Work with willing landowners to permanently protect remaining undeveloped areas. » Encourage town planners to improve approaches to development that may impact Focus Area functions. » Educate recreational users about the ecological and economic benefits provided by the Focus Area. » Monitor invasive plants to detect problems early. » Find ways to mitigate past and future contamination of the watershed. For more conservation opportunities, visit the Beginning with Habitat Online Toolbox: www.beginningwithhabitat.org/ toolbox/about_toolbox.html. Rare Animals Rare Plants Natural Communities Bald Eagle Lilaeopsis Estuary Bur-marigold Coastal Dune-marsh Ecosystem Spotted Turtle Mudwort Long-leaved Bluet Maritime Spruce–Fir Forest Harlequin Duck Dwarf Bulrush Estuary Monkeyflower Pitch Pine Dune Woodland Tidewater Mucket Marsh Bulrush Smooth Sandwort
    [Show full text]
  • American Eel Distribution and Dam Locations in the Merrymeeting Bay
    Seboomook Lake American Eel Distribution and Dam Ripogenus Lake Locations in the Merrymeeting Bay Pittston Farm North East Carry Lobster Lake Watershed (Androscoggin and Canada Falls Lake Rainbow Lake Kennebec River Watersheds) Ragged Lake a d a n Androscoggin River Watershed (3,526 sq. miles) a C Upper section (1,363 sq. miles) South Twin Lake Rockwood Lower section (2,162 sq. miles) Kokadjo Turkey Tail Lake Kennebec River Watershed (6,001 sq. miles) Moosehead Lake Wood Pond Long Pond Long Pond Dead River (879 sq. miles) Upper Jo-Mary Lake Upper Section (1,586 sq. miles) Attean Pond Lower Section (3,446 sq. miles) Number Five Bog Lowelltown Lake Parlin Estuary (90 sq. miles) Round Pond Hydrology; 1:100,000 National Upper Wilson Pond Hydrography Dataset Greenville ! American eel locations from MDIFW electrofishing surveys Spencer Lake " Dams (US Army Corps and ME DEP) Johnson Bog Shirley Mills Brownville Junction Brownville " Monson Sebec Lake Milo Caratunk Eustis Flagstaff Lake Dover-Foxcroft Guilford Stratton Kennebago Lake Wyman Lake Carrabassett Aziscohos Lake Bingham Wellington " Dexter Exeter Corners Oquossoc Rangeley Harmony Kingfield Wilsons Mills Rangeley Lake Solon Embden Pond Lower Richardson Lake Corinna Salem Hartland Sebasticook Lake Newport Phillips Etna " Errol New Vineyard " Madison Umbagog Lake Pittsfield Skowhegan Byron Carlton Bog Upton Norridgewock Webb Lake Burnham e Hinckley Mercer r Farmington Dixmont i h s " Andover e p Clinton Unity Pond n i m a a Unity M H East Pond Wilton Fairfield w e Fowler Bog Mexico N Rumford
    [Show full text]
  • Designation of Critical Habitat for the Gulf of Maine, New York Bight, And
    Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2016 / Proposed Rules 35701 the Act, including the factors identified Recovery and State Grants, Ecological Public hearings and public in this finding and explanation (see Services Program, U.S. Fish and information meetings: We will hold two Request for Information, above). Wildlife Service. public hearings and two public informational meetings on this proposed Conclusion Authority rule. We will hold a public On the basis of our evaluation of the The authority for these actions is the informational meeting from 2 to 4 p.m., information presented under section Endangered Species Act of 1973, as in Annapolis, Maryland on Wednesday, 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act, we have amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). July 13 (see ADDRESSES). A second determined that the petition to remove Dated: May 25, 2016. public informational meeting will be the golden-cheeked warbler from the Stephen Guertin, held from 3 to 5 p.m., in Portland, List of Endangered and Threatened Maine on Monday, July 18 (see Wildlife does not present substantial Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. ADDRESSES). We will hold two public scientific or commercial information [FR Doc. 2016–13120 Filed 6–2–16; 8:45 am] hearings, from 3 to 5 p.m. and 6 to 8 indicating that the requested action may p.m., in Gloucester, Massachusetts on BILLING CODE 4333–15–P be warranted. Therefore, we are not Thursday, July 21 (see ADDRESSES). initiating a status review for this ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, species. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE identified by the NOAA–NMFS–2015– We have further determined that the 0107, by either of the following petition to list the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • By-Law 410 a by Law Relating to the Municipal Plan for the Town of Oromocto ______
    BY-LAW 410 A BY LAW RELATING TO THE MUNICIPAL PLAN FOR THE TOWN OF OROMOCTO ______________________________________________________________________ BE IT ENACTED BY: The Mayor and Council of the Town of Oromocto, under the authority vested in it by Section 24 of the Community Planning Act as follows: 1. A Municipal Plan for the physical development and improvement of the municipality. This document is entitled “The Town of Oromocto Municipal Plan” dated 20 April 2006. 2. The Municipal Plan includes policy and proposal statements related to the following: Section 1 Introduction Section 2 Population Section 3 Oromocto Development Concept Section 4 Land Use Section 5 Residential Development Section 6 Commercial and Industrial Development Section 7 Institutional Development Section 8 Transportation Section 9 Municipal Services and Public Utilities Section 10 Environment Section 11 Recreation and Leisure Section 12 Tourism Section 13 Financial and Economic Considerations Section 14 Implementation Schedule “A” Municipal Plan Map Schedule “B” Ten Year Capital Budgets 3. By-Law 301, and subsequent amendments 301-A, 301-B, 301-C, 301-D, 301-E, 301-F, 301-G and 301-H including proposed Municipal Plan By-Law 408 are hereby repealed. READ FIRST TIME BY TITLE ONLY: 20 April 2006 READ SECOND TIME IN ITS ENTIRETY: READ THIRD TIME BY TITLE ONLY FOR ENACTMENT: __________________________ _________________________ A Wayne Carnell Fay L Tidd Chief Administrative Officer/Clerk Mayor SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION PREFACE 1.1 This document constitutes the Municipal Plan for the Town of Oromocto by updating and replacing all formerly adopted municipal plan by-laws. The Municipal Plan is written to provide general direction for the growth of the Community and sets forth Council’s long-term policies to guide all future land use within the Town.
    [Show full text]
  • Shorey's Brook Dam to Be Removed in York County
    FALL 2011/ WINTER 2012 THE NEWSLETTER OF MAINE RIVERS Shorey’s Brook Dam to be Removed in York County Much of the 4.3-mile Shorey’s in August 2010. Led by project Brook in South Berwick has manager and stewardship not actually looked like a coordinator Darrell DeTour, typical brook for many years. GWRLT has gathered many !e culprit is a dam perched partners, including the Wells several hundred yards below National Estuarine Research Route 101. Built as early as Reserve, the National the 1630s, it has morphed over Oceanic and Atmospheric the centuries into a decrepit Administration, Conservation hodgepodge of industrial Decrepit and inconspicuous, the Shorey’s Brook dam Law Foundation, the US Fish material, impenetrable by is di!cult to capture in a picture. Right, Tin Smith and Wildlife Service, and anadromous "sh including leads a tour of the restoration site. others, to plan, permit, and alewives, smelt, and Atlantic fund the removal. salmon. A dam removal is currently on track to take place !is project promises to be a success in Maine both for in November to restore the brook. In early October we reconnecting long-fragmented habitat and as a model to toured the dam removal site with members of Great Works inspire other entities—land trusts, municipalities, and Regional Land Trust and other project partners. others—who may be considering a dam removal project !e Great Works Regional Land Trust (GWRLT) acquired but are daunted by the perceived complexity and cost. To the 27-acre Raymond & Simone Savage Wildlife Preserve date this project has drawn little controversy and is on that surrounds Shorey’s Brook in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Friends of Merrymeeting Bay P.O
    Friends of Merrymeeting Bay P.O. Box 233 Richmond, ME 04357 www.fomb.org To: Susanne Meidel, Water Quality Standards Coordinator Maine Department of Environmental Protection SHS 17 Augusta, ME 04333 207-441-3612 [email protected] From: Jennifer Brockway, Executive Director Friends of Merrymeeting Bay 207-666-1118 [email protected] E-Filed Subject: Water Re-Classification Proposal River/Sections: Androscoggin from Worumbo Dam to Merrymeeting Bay Proposed Upgrade: C to B Basis for Proposal: Actual conditions exceed those of present classification Documentation: Supporting data from FOMB monitoring program approved by Maine DEP and USEPA Data Collection Periods: DO-1999 to present; Coliform Bacteria-2006 to present Sampling Intervals: Monthly: April-October Proposal Date: November 29, 2017 Dear Ms. Meidel: Please consider this our formal upgrade proposal for the lower section of the Androscoggin River between Merrymeeting Bay at the line from Pleasant Point in Topsham to North Bath extending upriver to Worumbo Dam in Lisbon Falls. As our data show, while classified as C, this section has long been on the cusp of and now is actually meeting, Class B standards. We therefore propose it be upgraded from C to B. FOMB has the most complete set of classification data for the reaches in this proposal. We began our monitoring program in 1999 and continue to this day with over twenty sampling sites on the Androscoggin, Kennebec and around Merrymeeting Bay. FOMB joined the VRMP in 2009 to further support and substantiate water classification upgrades. Because the actual water quality of the lower Androscoggin sections described here exceeds that of their current classification, our request for a reclassification from C to B is supported by the State antidegradation policy as quoted below: 38 M.R.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Life History Data on the Alewife and Blueback Herring of the Saint John River, New Brunswick ,1973
    Canada. Fisheries and Marine Service. Maritimes Region. Resource Development Branch. DATA RECORD SERIES MAR/D 1411 Environment Canada Environnement Canada Fisheries Service des peches and Marine Service et des sciences de la mer Life History Data on the Alewife and Blueback Herring of the Saint John River, New Brunswick ,1973 by B.M. Jessop Data Record Series No. MAR/ D-77-2 Freshwater and Anadromous Division Resource Branch Maritimes Region LIFE HISTORY DATA ON THE ALEWIFE AND BLUEBACK HERRING OF THE SAINT JOHN RIVER, NEW BRUNSWICK, 1973 S.M. JESSOP FEBRUARY, 1973 DATA RECORD SERIES NO. MAR/D-77-2 FRESHWATER AND ANADROMOUS DIVISION RESOURCE BRANCH. FISHERIES AND MARINE SERVICE DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES AND THE' ENVIRONMENT HALIFAX, NOVA SCOTIA iii CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES v LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ix INTRODUCTION 1 METHODS 1 RUN TIMING 2 RESULTS 2 DISCUSSION 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 47 REFERENCES 49 V LIST OF. TABLES TABLE 1. Mean fork lengths (mm), by sample date and location, for gaspereau from the Saint John River, 1973 5 TABLE 2. Mean fork lengths (mm), by sample date and location, for alewives from the Saint John River, 1973 6 TABLE 3. Length-frequency distributions of mature alewives, by sex and location, Saint John River, 1973 7 TABLE 4. Length-frequency distributions of immature alewives, by location, Saint John River, 1973 8 TABLE 5. Observed length-frequency of alewives, by age-groups, sexes and locations combined, Saint John River, 1973 8 TABLE 6. Mean fork lengths (mm) of alewives, by sex and age, by location, 1973. 1. Washademoak Lake 9 2. Grand Lake 9 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Feed Grain Transportation and Storage Assistance Regulations
    CANADA CONSOLIDATION CODIFICATION Feed Grain Transportation and Règlement sur l’aide au Storage Assistance Regulations transport et à l’emmagasinage des céréales C.R.C., c. 1027 C.R.C., ch. 1027 Current to November 21, 2016 À jour au 21 novembre 2016 Published by the Minister of Justice at the following address: Publié par le ministre de la Justice à l’adresse suivante : http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca http://lois-laws.justice.gc.ca OFFICIAL STATUS CARACTÈRE OFFICIEL OF CONSOLIDATIONS DES CODIFICATIONS Subsections 31(1) and (3) of the Legislation Revision and Les paragraphes 31(1) et (3) de la Loi sur la révision et la Consolidation Act, in force on June 1, 2009, provide as codification des textes législatifs, en vigueur le 1er juin follows: 2009, prévoient ce qui suit : Published consolidation is evidence Codifications comme élément de preuve 31 (1) Every copy of a consolidated statute or consolidated 31 (1) Tout exemplaire d'une loi codifiée ou d'un règlement regulation published by the Minister under this Act in either codifié, publié par le ministre en vertu de la présente loi sur print or electronic form is evidence of that statute or regula- support papier ou sur support électronique, fait foi de cette tion and of its contents and every copy purporting to be pub- loi ou de ce règlement et de son contenu. Tout exemplaire lished by the Minister is deemed to be so published, unless donné comme publié par le ministre est réputé avoir été ainsi the contrary is shown. publié, sauf preuve contraire.
    [Show full text]
  • Deparment of Marine Resources Chapter 55
    DEPARMENT OF MARINE RESOURCES CHAPTER 55 - GEAR RESTRICTIONS TITLE INDEX 55.03 Special Area Closures to Fishing 55.04 Maine Gillnet Bait Fishing Regulations 55.05 Use of Purse, Drag or Stop Seines in Certain Waters Prohibited; Regulation of Fishing Therein 55.06 Fish Passage Regulations 55.07 Seasonal Net Restrictions 55.08 Method of Mechanical Harvest Prohibited 55.14 Fishing in the Presumpscot River 55.15 Fishing in the Bagaduce River Upstream of the North Brooksville Sedgwick Bridge 55.30 Fishing in the Sheepscot River, Lincoln County 55.35 Use of draggers in Sheepscot Bay, Lincoln County 55.40 Fishing for cod and other ground fish in Sheepscot Bay, Lincoln County 55.50 Seining in Sasanoa River, Sagadahoc County 55.55 Fishing in Cathance and Abagadasset Rivers, Sagadahoc County 55.56 Fishing for Suckers in the Towns of Bowdoinham and Topsham 55.58 Penobscot River Fishing Closure 55.59 Penobscot River Tributaries Fishing Closures 55.60 Fishing in Narraguagus River, Washington County 55.70 Fishing in Dennys River, Washington County 55.75 York County; otter trawling in Spruce Creek 55.80 Fishing in Bond, Kennebec County 55.85 Fishing in the Damariscotta River 55.93 Fixed Gill nets: Tending Requirements: Kennebec/Androscoggin Rivers 55.94 Use of Gill Nets in the Kennebec and Androscoggin Rivers 55.95 Fishing in Royal River, Yarmouth DEPARTMENT OF MARINE RESOURCES Chapter 55 page 2 55.96 Penobscot River Gear Restrictions. 55.97 Fishing in the Kennebec River above the Gardiner/Randolph Bridge 55.98 Fishing in the Androscoggin River Above the Route #201 Bridge Between Brunswick and Topsham 55.99 Fishing in the Saco River Above the Footbridge Between Saco and Biddeford DEPARTMENT OF MARINE RESOURCES Chapter 55 page 3 DEPARTMENT OF MARINE RESOURCES Chapter 55 - Gear Restrictions 55.03 Special Area Closures to Fishing Except as provided by further regulation of the Commissioner, the following waters are closed to fishing: Dams with fishways.
    [Show full text]
  • Stillwater Recertification Attachments 2015
    Stillwater Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2712) Project Description Black Bear Hydro Partners, LLC’s Stillwater Hydroelectric Project is a run-of-river hydroelectric generating facility located on the Stillwater Branch of the Penobscot River in Old Town, Maine with a gross nameplate generating capacity of 4.18 MW. The Stillwater Project Powerhouse A commenced initial commercial operations in 1913. The Licensee applied for an amendment to increase capacity at the Stillwater Project via the construction of an additional powerhouse (Powerhouse B). The Project consists of an existing 1,720-foot-long dam consisting of 13 sections of various height, creating an impoundment with a normal full pond elevation of 94.65 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum. The Project has two powerhouses. Powerhouse A consists of four generating units a total installed capacity of 1,950 kW and a maximum hydraulic capacity of 1,700 cfs. Powerhouse B consists of three generating units with a total installed capacity of 2,229 kW and a maximum hydraulic capacity of 1,758 cfs. Powerhouse A has 50 ft long aerial transmission lines installed from the powerhouse’s GSU to the existing substation. Powerhouse B has 300 ft long aerial transmission lines installed from the powerhouse’s generating step-up unit (GSU) to the existing, adjacent 12.5 kV distribution system located adjacent to the existing project boundary and along the south side of Stillwater Avenue. The Stillwater Powerhouse B commenced initial commercial operation September, 2013. The Stillwater Project generates clean, renewable electricity while providing recreational opportunities (portage trail, parking areas for river access and hand-carried boat launch), fish passage measures, consistent water levels that enhance habitats for waterfowl, etc., and substantial support of the local community through stable property tax payments, reliable voltage support of the electrical distribution system, etc.
    [Show full text]