DOCSLIB.ORG

San Antonio and Nacimiento Rivers Watershed Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
San Antonio and Nacimiento Rivers Watershed Management Plan California State University, Monterey Bay Digital Commons @ CSUMB Miscellaneous Monterey and San Luis Obispo Salinas River and Carmel River Groundwater County Documents and Reports Basins 12-19-2018 2008 - San Antonio and Nacimiento Rivers Watershed Management Plan Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/hornbeck_cgb_5 Part of the Business Commons, Education Commons, Engineering Commons, Law Commons, Life Sciences Commons, Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation "2008 - San Antonio and Nacimiento Rivers Watershed Management Plan" (2018). Miscellaneous Monterey and San Luis Obispo County Documents and Reports. 35. https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/hornbeck_cgb_5/35 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Salinas River and Carmel River Groundwater Basins at Digital Commons @ CSUMB. It has been accepted for inclusion in Miscellaneous Monterey and San Luis Obispo County Documents and Reports by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ CSUMB. For more information, please contact [email protected]. San Antonio and Nacimiento Rivers Watershed Management Plan October 2008 Prepared by the Nacitone Watersheds Steering Committee and Central Coast Salmon Enhancement, Inc. Prepared for the Monterey County Water Resources Agency and the State Water Resources Control Board Funding for this project has been provided in full or in part through an agreement with the State Water Resources Control Board. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the State Water Resources Control Board, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendations for use. (This page intentionally left blank) 2 Acknowledgements Facilitation of the Nacitone Watersheds Planning Process was managed by Traci Roberts of the Monterey County Farm Bureau. Stephnie Wald of Central Coast Salmon Enhancement prepared the watershed management plan with grateful assistance of Nicole Smith, Elise Torres, and Sarah Paddack. The preparation of the management plan was guided by Steering Committee Co-chairs Duane Wolgomott and Phil Humphrey. Ken Ekelund of the Monterey County Water Resources Agency managed the SWRCB grant that funded the Nacitone Watersheds Management Plan. Each member of the Steering Committee also contributed valuable information and assistance and is acknowledged below. Ann Beckett, Lockwood resident Marilyn Breland, Heritage Ranch resident Bill Capps, Nacimiento Regional Water Management Advisory Committee Terry Chavis, Heritage Ranch resident Ken Ekelund, Program Manager, Monterey County Water Resources Agency Letty French, Nacimiento watershed resident Adrienne Greve, Assistant Professor, City & Regional Planning Department, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo Michel Hardoy, Lockwood resident Wally Haussamen, Fort Hunter Liggett, Natural Resources Manager Phil Humfrey, Nacimiento Regional Water Management Advisory Committee Mary Ann Martinus, Lockwood resident David Osgood, Nacimiento watershed resident; Chair, Adelaide Farm Center Dennis Palm, Ventana Wilderness Alliance Lester Patterson, Lockwood resident Eric Peterson, Lime Mountain Mining Company Bill Phillips, MCWRA Deputy General Manager Kim Roth, Lockwood resident Tom Shepherd, Monterey County Parks & Recreation Scott Smith, Vice Chair, Adelaide Farm Center Lisa Wallender, Water Systems Chemist, Public Works Department, County of San Luis Obispo Mark Williams, Camp Roberts, Environmental Chief Duane Wolgamott, Lockwood resident 3 The members of the Technical Advisory Committee made themselves available for the betterment of this document and are listed below. Ann Beckett, Historian and Lockwood resident Rob Atwill, Doctor, UC Davis, School of Veterinerian Medicine John Bradford, US Forest Service, District Ranger James Caruso, Senior Planner, SLO County John D’Ornellas, Heritage Ranch Community Service District Manager Ken Ekelund, Monterey County Water Resources Agency Jill Falcone, Environmental Resource Specialist, County of San Luis Obispo, Dept. of Public Works Joy Fitzhugh, San Luis Obispo County Farm Bureau Howard Franklin, Hydrologist, Monterey County Water Resources Agency DJ Funk, Executive Directory, Upper Salinas Las Tablas Resource Conservation District Steve Knudsen, San Luis Obispo County Farm Bureau Robert LaFluer, Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture (Salinas Service Center) Royce Larsen, UC Cooperative Extension, Area Natural Resources, Watershed Advisory Margy Lindquist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture (Templeton Service Center) Danny Marquis, Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Steve Mason, Land Use Technician, Planning Department, County of Monterey Kay Mercer, Agriculture Water Quality Consultant, Kay Mercer, Inc. Donna Meyers, Big Sur Land Trust Elizabeth Painter, Botanist Margaret Paul, California Department of Fish and Game Paul Robins, Executive Director, Resource Conservation District of Monterey County Mary Root, Conservation Partnerships Coordinator, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Bob Schubert, Senior Planner, Planning Department, County of Monterey Kelly Sorenson, Ventana Wilderness Society Ken Tate, Rangeland Watershed Specialist, Cooperative Extension, Department of Plant Sciences, UC Davis Kathy Thomasberg, Water Quality Specialist, Monterey County Water Resources Agency Lisa Wallender, Water Systems Chemist, SLO County Public Works Mark Williams, Environmental Chief, Camp Roberts Duane Wolgamott Phil Humfrey 4 Executive Summary There are two aspects to the development of any watershed plan. Dedicated people spent countless hours discussing concerns, issues and potential solutions to problems. This dedication leads to the production of documents that hope to articulate the outcome of the dialog in a way that is useful for the community. The executive summary identifies the Nacitone Watersheds Management process and products, and attempts to capture the major core findings arising out of both efforts. The Vision The Nacimiento/San Antonio River Watersheds Management Plan should protect water quality and watershed uses for all stakeholders. The Purpose The purpose of the Nacitone Watersheds Management Plan is to identify the existing conditions of and stresses in these watersheds as they relate to water quality, and recommend methods for reducing or eliminating those stressors such as alternative land use practices. The Process The Nacitone Watersheds Management planning process is a stakeholder driven process that represents the interests of residents, agencies and businesses that work and live in the watersheds. The stakeholder process used to produce these products presents an investment of 8800 volunteer hours of time in meetings, field trips, community outreach and planning. The magnitude of the effort includes far more than this if one includes the hundreds of contacts made through flyers, press releases and web-site visits. Each of the products was placed on the web-site for public review. Public comment periods were held for the Goals and Strategies document and the Watershed Management Plan. There were Steering and Technical Advisory Committees as well as a staff team guiding the process and development of the products. The members of each are listed in the acknowledgement section of the plan and referenced in Part 1 “How the Plan was Prepared.” The Products The Nacitone Watersheds Plan was initiated by the Monterey County Water Resources Agency (MCWRA) and funded by a grant from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. As part of the grant, several products were produced to assist the watershed stakeholders in gathering and analyzing existing information about the watersheds to discern critical issues facing the watersheds and potential remedies. These products include: Watershed Resources Inventory (WRI)—Existing watershed information was identified including reports, studies, maps, Geographic Information System (GIS) files, and technical data covering land use, water supply, water quality, ecology, hydrology, habitat and vegetation, agricultural and grazing practices, and planning efforts. The inventory is comprised of a spreadsheet file containing over 300 entries as well as an annotated bibliography of a select number of the entries. 5 Analysis of the WRI (Analysis)— Existing information was compiled in order to establish a baseline describing existing watershed conditions including land use, major water features, water quality, water supply, designated beneficial uses, point and nonpoint sources of water pollution, population, infrastructure, vegetation and habitat, and agricultural and grazing practices. Trends were identified for those items that had sufficient historical data. The Analysis did not include a technical review of compiled information. Grazing Land Management Plan—the Upper Salinas/Las Tablas Resource Conservation District conducted an assessment of the 24,000 acres of grazing land owned and managed by the MCWRA at the Nacimiento and San Antonio Reservoirs to determine impacts on water quality, maintenance of ecological communities, and management of sustainable and restorative grazing. Watershed Goals and Strategies—The WRI and Analysis were utilized by the stakeholder group to articulate goals and planning strategies for future watershed activities that focus on water quality improvements. These include non-regulatory approaches to watershed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp (Branchinecta Lynchi)
    fairy shrimp populations are regularly monitored by Bureau of Land Management staff. In the San Joaquin Vernal Pool Region, vernal pool habitats occupied by the longhorn fairy shrimp are protected at the Kesterson National Wildlife Refuge. 4. VERNAL POOL FAIRY SHRIMP (BRANCHINECTA LYNCHI) a. Description and Taxonomy Taxonomy.—The vernal pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi) was first described by Eng, Belk and Eriksen (Eng et al. 1990). The species was named in honor of James B. Lynch, a systematist of North American fairy shrimp. The type specimen was collected in 1982 at Souza Ranch, Contra Costa County, California. Although not yet described, the vernal pool fairy shrimp had been collected as early as 1941, when it was identified as the Colorado fairy shrimp by Linder (1941). Description and Identification.—Although most species of fairy shrimp look generally similar (see Box 1- Appearance and Identification of Vernal Pool Crustaceans), vernal pool fairy shrimp are characterized by the presence and size of several mounds (see identification section below) on the male's second antennae, and by the female's short, pyriform brood pouch. Vernal pool fairy shrimp vary in size, ranging from 11 to 25 millimeters (0.4 to 1.0 inch) in length (Eng et al. 1990). Vernal pool fairy shrimp closely resemble Colorado fairy shrimp (Branchinecta coloradensis) (Eng et al. 1990). However, there are differences in the shape of a small mound-like feature located at the base of the male's antennae, called the pulvillus. The Colorado fairy shrimp has a round pulvillus, while the vernal pool fairy shrimp's pulvillus is elongate.
    [Show full text]
  • Powder River! Let 'Er Buck!
    Fir Tree March, 2012 91st Training Division e-publication POWDER RIVER! LET ‘ER BUCK! 91st Division soldier speaks at Ft. Irwin Huey Retirement page 4 From the Commanding General Fir91st Training DivisionTree Newsletter The 91st Training Division is in full-stride as we ramp up preparations for our summer exercises. The CSM and I plan to visit as many of you as possible over the next Commanding General: few months before the exercises start. A few weeks ago, Brigadier General James T. Cook we had a chance to experience award winning marksman- ship training first-hand while visiting one of the 91st’s Small Arms Readiness Detachments during their Annual Training. Our division is full of talent, so stay-tuned as they compete Office of Public Affairs: in the All-Army Marksmanship Competition. Additionally, 91st Division Soldier honors civilian employer with ESGR we continue to strive for joint certification. We met with the page 5 Director: Commodore of the Navy’s 31st Seabees, Capt. John Korka, and his team to continue our mutual support of their train- Capt. Rebecca Murga ing exercises and integration into our the CSTX and Warrior Exercises. Assistant Director: Please thank your families for their support as you 1st Lt. Fernando Ochoa are away from home more and more through the spring at many workshops and extended meetings. Keep up the great Non Commissioned Officer in Charge: work and stay focused on our goal of providing world class training to the Reserve Forces. Staff Sgt. Jason Hudson Powder River! Editor: Message from the Commanding Gen. & Sgt.
    [Show full text]
  • First 12W Engineer Course at FHL 1-184Th Infantry Regiment Stryker Qualifications
    THE OFFICIAL MAGAZINE FOR U.S. ARMY GARRISON FORT HUNTER LIGGETT/PARKS RESERVE FORCES TRAINING AREA The Golden Guidon First 12W Engineer Course at FHL 1-184th Infantry Regiment Stryker Qualifications www.home.army.mil/liggett | www.home.army.mil/parks Summer 2020 Contents Commander’s Message 3 THE GOLDEN GUIDON Chaplain’s Corner 4 Official Command Publication of U.S. Army Garrison Fort Hunter Liggett/ In the Spotlight 5 Parks Reserve Forces Training Area Garrison Highlights 11 FHL COMMAND TEAM Col. Charles Bell, Garrison Commander Training Highlights 20 David Myhres, Deputy to the Garrison Commander Community Engagements 24 Lt. Col. Stephen Stanley Deputy Garrison Commander Soldier & Employee Bulletin 26 Command Sgt. Major Mark Fluckiger, Garrison Command Sergeant Major PRFTA COMMAND TEAM Lt. Col. Serena Johnson, Features PRFTA Commander Command Sgt. Samuel MacKenzie, • Mesa Del Ray Airport 12 PRFTA Command Sgt. Major • Garrison Asian, Pacific GOLDEN GUIDON STAFF Islanders Share Their Stories 16 Amy Phillips, FHL Public Affairs Officer Jim O’Donnell, PRFTA Public Affairs Officer • It’s What’s Inside the Heart, Cindy McIntyre, Public Affairs Specialist Not the Color That Matters 19 The Golden Guidon is an authorized quarterly publication for the U.S. Army Garrison Fort Hunter Liggett community. Content in this publication is not necessarily the official views of, or endorsed by, the U.S. Government or the Dept. of the Army, or FHL/PRFTA. SUBMISSIONS Guidelines available on the FHL website in the Public Affairs Office section. Submit stories, photographs, and other information to the Public Affairs Office usarmy. COVER PHOTO: California National Army Guard Soldiers with the 1-184th Infantry Regiment from Palmdale, conducting annual Stryker Gunnery Qualifications at Fort hunterliggett.imcom-central.list.fhl-pao @ Hunter Liggett, August 5.
    [Show full text]
  • 10, George C. Marshall
    'The views expressed are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the US Air Force, Department of Defense or the US Government.'" USAFA Harmon Memorial Lecture #10 “George C. Marshall: Global Commander” Forrest C. Pogue, 1968 It is a privilege to be invited to give the tenth lecture in a series which has become widely-known among teachers and students of military history. I am, of course, delighted to talk with you about Gen. George C. Marshall with whose career I have spent most of my waking hours since1956. Douglas Freeman, biographer of two great Americans, liked to say that he had spent twenty years in the company of Gen. Lee. After devoting nearly twelve years to collecting the papers of General Marshall and to interviewing him and more than 300 of his contemporaries, I can fully appreciate his point. In fact, my wife complains that nearly any subject from food to favorite books reminds me of a story about General Marshall. If someone serves seafood, I am likely to recall that General Marshall was allergic to shrimp. When I saw here in the audience Jim Cate, professor at the University of Chicago and one of the authors of the official history of the U.S. Army Air Forces in World War II, I recalled his fondness for the works of G.A. Henty and at once there came back to me that Marshall once said that his main knowledge of Hannibal came from Henty's The Young Carthaginian. If someone asks about the General and Winston Churchill, I am likely to say, "Did you know that they first met in London in 1919 when Marshall served as Churchill's aide one afternoon when the latter reviewed an American regiment in Hyde Park?" Thus, when I mentioned to a friend that I was coming to the Air Force Academy to speak about Marshall, he asked if there was much to say about the General's connection with the Air Force.
    [Show full text]
  • “OPEN WARFARE” DOCTRINE in the LIGHT of AMERICAN MILITARY HISTORY by Gene Fax
    National Archives ••• PERSHING’S “OPEN WARFARE” DOCTRINE IN THE LIGHT OF AMERICAN MILITARY HISTORY By Gene Fax n May 1917, John J. Pershing became the frst American general driving the enemy out into the open and engaging him in a war of Isince the Civil War to lead a feld army of more than a few movement.”2 Americans, he believed, were inherently superior to thousand men. For most of the intervening time, the U.S. Army the soldiers of other nations in their initiative and their aptitude had had three main missions: protecting the coasts, quelling labor for marksmanship.3 In his statement of training principles he unrest, and chasing—but rarely fighting—Indians.1 Pershing declared, “Te rife and the bayonet are the principal weapons of himself operated against Indians in the west, the Spanish in Cuba, the infantry soldier. He will be trained to a high degree of skill Moros in the Philippines, and Pancho Villa in Mexico. None of as a marksman both on the target range and in feld fring. An these prepared him or the Army for the all-consuming war then aggressive spirit must be developed until the soldier feels himself, going on in France. Pershing and the Army were largely unfamiliar as a bayonet fghter, invincible in battle.”4 with modern weapons, tactics, and logistics. Pershing himself had observed the Russo-Japanese War, the frst Yet Pershing knew how he wanted his new Army to fght. Te major confict to use modern weapons. In his reports he described trench-bound stalemate of the Western Front was not for him.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Hunter Liggett 75Th Anniversary Open House
    U.S. ARMY GARRISON FORT HUNTER LIGGETT SEPTEMBER 2016 Fort Hunter Liggett 75th Anniversary Open House www.liggett.army.mil Army Reserve CG visits FHL Lt. Gen. Charles D. Luckey, chief, Army Reserve and commanding general for the United States Army Reserve Command, addressed the The Official Command Publication of 315th Engineer Battalion during Fort Hunter Liggett their annual extended combat train- ing on August 7, 2016. Cover pho- to by Eric W. Jones COMMAND TEAM Page 4 Col. Jan C. Norris Garrison Commander Fort Hunter Liggett Mark Hamelin 75th Anniversary Deputy to the Garrison Commander Open House Lt. Col. Meritt Phillips Page 5 Deputy Garrison Commander Command Sgt. Major DeeAnn Dunstan Garrison Command Sergeant Major GOLDEN GUIDON STAFF Amy Phillips Public Affairs Officer Eric Jones Mark Hamelin Public Affairs Specialist Legacy at FHL Page 15 The Golden Guidon is an authorized quarterly publication for members of the U.S. Army Garrison Fort Hunter Liggett. Contents of this publication are not necessarily the official Commander’s Notes 3 views of, or endorsed by, the U.S. Government or the Department of the Army, In the Spotlight 9 or Fort Hunter Liggett. SUBMISSIONS Community Engagements 10 The Golden Guidon welcomes your story Mission Highlights 13 ideas, photographs, and other information of interest to the FHL community. Contact the Garrison Highlights 15 Public Affairs Office at Email or 831-386-2690. FEEDBACK WELCOMED Chaplain’s Message 17 Help us create a relevant and meaningful Safety First 18 product to meet your information needs. Visit ICE site to provide feedback. Employee Bulletin 19 Community Events/News 20 Greetings Team Fort Hunter Liggett, Maintenance) - Training Range Enhancements As we approach Fall and the (DPTMS) end of FY16, I trust you had an en- joyable Summer with family and LOE3: Infrastructure (Sustainment/ friends.
    [Show full text]
  • Listing of US Army Components FOIA Contacts, 2014
    Description of document: Listing of US Army components FOIA contacts, 2014 Requested date: 28-December-2013 Released date: 23-January-2014 Posted date: 27-January-2014 Source of document: U.S. Army Freedom of Information Office Casey Building, Suite 150 ATTN: AAHS-RDF 7701 Telegraph Road Alexandria, VA 22315-3905 US Army online FOIA Request Form The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT TO THE SECRETARY 9301 CHAPEK ROAD FORT BELVOIR 22060-5527 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF 23 January 2014 CHIEF ATTORNEY & LEGAL SERVICES Emailed This letter is in response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request dated 28 December 2013 in which you requested a listing of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001
    CALIFORNIA HISTORIC MILITARY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES INVENTORY VOLUME I: INVENTORIES OF HISTORIC BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES ON CALIFORNIA MILITARY INSTALLATIONS Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 Prepared by: FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION Sacramento, California 95834 and JRP JRP HISTORICAL CONSULTING SERVICES Davis, California 95616 March2000 Calirornia llisloric Miliiary Buildings and Structures Inventory, \'olume I CONTENTS Page CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................... i FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................ ii TABLES ......................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................... viii SERIES INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ ix 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1-1 I. I Purpose and Goals ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • California Capitol Hill Bulletin
    THE CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE FOR FEDERAL POLICY RESEARCH 1608 Rhode Island Avenue, NW, Suite 213, Washington, D.C. 20036 202-974-6384 fax:202-223-2330 e-mail: [email protected] web: http://www.calinst.org California Capitol Hill Bulletin Volume 15, Bulletin 26 – September 26, 2008 To expand communications between Washington and California, the California Institute provides periodic news bulletins regarding current activity on Capitol Hill that directly impacts the state. Bulletins are published weekly during sessions of Congress, and occasionally during other periods. CONTENTS: A PPROPRIATIONS: HOUSE PASSES CR, EXTENDING Appropriations: House Passes CR, Extending Federal FEDERAL FUNDING THROUGH MARCH 6, 2009 Funding Through March 6, 2009. 1 By a vote of 370-58, the House on September 24, 2008 passed Appropriations: Elements of the 2009 CR.. 1 H.R. 2638, funding most government agencies at fiscal year 2008 levels through March 6, 2009. The measure, however, does Appropriations: Homeland Security Earmarks in the FY 2009 CR................................. 3 include new and higher FY09 funding levels for military construction and the Departments of Defense, Homeland Security Appropriations: Defense-Related Earmarked Items in the FY 2009 CR. ............................. 3 and Veterans Affairs. Appropriations: MilCon-VA Earmarked Items in the FY In order to garner votes for the bill and avoid a veto, it does 2009 CR................................. 5 not include a continuation of the moratorium on exploration for offshore oil; the moratorium will expire at the end of this month. Immigration: Pew Report Reviews Immigrants’ Perception of Life In U.S.. 6 Opponents of offshore drilling expect that the next Administration and Congress will deal with the issue.
    [Show full text]
  • MST HIGHLIGHTS January 12, 1998 MEETING
    REVISED Board of Directors Regular Meeting May 9, 2011 MST Conference Room One Ryan Ranch Road, Monterey 10:00 a.m. TRANSPORTATION: Ride Line 8 Ryan Ranch-Edgewater to MST Office 1. CALL TO ORDER 1-1. Roll call. 1-2. Pledge of Allegiance. 2. CLOSED SESSION As permitted by Government Code §64956 et seq. of the State of California, The Board of Directors may adjourn to Closed Session to consider specific matters dealing with personnel and/or pending possible litigation and/or conferring with the Board's Meyers-Milias-Brown Act representative. 2-1. Conference with property negotiators. (APN 032 171 005; L.2.3, L.2.4.1, L.2.4.3, L.2.4.2, APN 031-011-056-000, L.5.1) (Carl Sedoryk) (No enclosure) 3. RETURN TO OPEN SESSION 3-1. Report on Closed Session and possible action. 4. CONSENT AGENDA 4-1. Review highlights of Agenda. (Carl Sedoryk) These items will be approved by a single motion. Anyone may request that an item be discussed and considered separately. 4-2. Adopt Resolution 2011-20 recognizing Steve Colburn, Coach Operator, as May Employee of the Month. (Robert Weber) (p. 1) 4-3. Minutes of the regular meeting of April 11, 2011. (Sonia Bannister) (p.3) 4-4. Disposal of property left aboard buses. (Sonia Bannister) (p. 9) 4-5. Financial Reports – March 2011. (Kathy Williams) (p. 11) 4-6. $130,000 Hastus (Giro, Inc.) multi-year maintenance and support contract agreement. (Mark Eccles) (p. 43) 4-7. South County Area Service Analysis adoption. (Hunter Harvath) (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D - Facilities Environmental Severity Classification Study Revision 2 by Steve Geusic 8/24/2018
    Appendix D - Facilities Environmental Severity Classification Study Revision 2 by Steve Geusic 8/24/2018 UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS State/Territories/Possessions Installation Master Name ESC* Alabama Anniston AR Depot C31 Fort Mcclellan C31 Fort Rucker C31 Maxwell AF Base C31 Redstone Arsenal C31 Alabama National Guard C31 Alabama Reserves C31 1 Alaska Clear AF Station C2 1 Eielson AF Base C2 1 Fort Greely C2 1 Fort Wainwright C2 3 Alaska National Guard C4 3 Alaska Reserves C4 3 Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson C3 3 Naf Adak Ak C5 3 Eareckson AF Station C4 1 Arizona AF PLANT 44 ARMED FORCES PLANT C2 1 Arizona National Guard C2 1 Arizona Reserves C2 1 Davis-Monthan AF Base C2 1 Fort Huachuca C2 1 Luke AF Base C2 1 Mcas Yuma Az C2 1 Yuma Proving Ground C2 1 Arkansas Arkansas National Guard C3 1 Arkansas Reserves C3 1 Little Rock AF Base C3 1 Pine Bluff Arsenal C3 1 California Naf El Centro Ca C2 1 Mcagcc Twentynine Palms Ca C2 1 Mclb Barstow Ca C2 1 National Training Center And Fort Irwin C2 1 Sierra AR Depot C2 1 Beale AF Base C2 1 Naws China Lake C2 1 AF PLANT 42 ARMED FORCES PLANT C2 2 California National Guard C3 2 California Reserves C3 Appendix D - Facilities Environmental Severity Classification Study Revision 2 by Steve Geusic 8/24/2018 1 Defense Distribution Depot San Joaquin C2 1 Edwards AF Base C2 1 Fort Hunter Liggett C2 2 Los Angeles AF Base C4 1 Mcas El Toro Santa Ana Ca C3 1 Mcas Tustin Ca C3 2 Military Ocean Terminal Concord C3 3 Nas Alameda Ca C5 1 Nas Lemoore Ca C2 1 Nrc Stockton Ca C2 1 Sacramento AR
    [Show full text]
  • Jîattonal#Uarttôman
    Œfje Jteto §?orfe Jîattonal#uarttôman H APPY C H RI STM AS Bmmbrr, 1935 15r Wty Olo^y Air Conditioned De Luxe Service BETWEEN NEW YORK AND MONTREAL Shortest, Fastest, Most Comfor table Route... Daily from Grand Central Terminal. New York City Daily from Windsor Station, Montréal OVERNIGHT SERVICE FROM NEW YORK DAYLIGHT SERVICE FROM NEW YORK The MONTREAL LIMITED The LAURENTIAN Air Conditioned See the Hudson, Lake Champlain and the Adirondacks. Club Diner—Parlor Cars—Coaches. Ail Pullman—Lounge Car—Private Bedroom, Draw- ing-rooin, Compartment and Open Section Sleeping Lv. New York - - 9:00 A.M, Cars—All-steel Modem Equipment—No Extra Fare. Ar. Montréal - 7:15 P.M, Lv. New York 10 :45 P.M. Lv. Montréal 9:30 P.M. Lv. Montréal - 10:00 A.M. Ar. Montréal 7:50 A.M. Ar. New York 7:35 A.M. Ar. New York - - 7:45 P.M, DELAWARE & HUDSON : îrs^x^Nr-^v» <T'«>=«>'«N*^«>«>'=%^'«>«> «N«^>^ and Men of the New York National Guard IN récognition of • their splendid sacri­ fice in helping to keep our National Défense in a state of preparedness and of their readiness at ail times to serve their country and our i people with that dé­ votion for which they hâve merited our just praise, time and time again. —A Sincère Admirer. The NEW YORK NATIONAL GUARDSMAN (Officiai State Publication) LT. COL. HENRY E. SUAVET LIEUT. T. F. WOODHOUSE Editor Asst. Editor and Business Mgr. LT. COL. WM. J. MANGINE MAJOR ERNEST G. DREHER General Advertising Mgr. N.. T. G. Advertising Mgr.
    [Show full text]