The Engineer 339

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Engineer 339 O ct. 29, 1886. THE ENGINEER 339 THE NAVIES OF BRITAIN AND FRANCE. seas. Thisis a great error. We believe that our blows would as to England ’s defence, and in the case of France as the be found far-reaching and quick, if not very heavy; and enemy, raised in its most serious shape. Suffering and A portion of the French Press has latterly adopted a that no Power could carry out this class of undertaking with loss would be entailed on England, but nothing decisive threatening tone towards England. Our occupation of the ease and speed of England. Abyssinia, Ashanti, Egypt, could be effected at once, and it is hard to say what would Egypt has lasted too long, and has excited the jealousy of and the Zula War have all called into play the necessary follow. It might be that gradually the French vessels our neighbours. Hence we are told a war with England machinery for this class of operation, while such machinery would be captured. This is the more likely, as in order to would be popular, seeing that “no general mobilisation is habitually working in India. At the present moment stop our trade from the West they would have to act would be necessary”—we quote from the Standard —“ as we have about thirty thousand men in Burmah. The further from their base of operations than our own. Then an invasion of France was not to be apprehended, and state of the country, no doubt, has been the object of a again other nations would suffer as well as ourselves. When any landing of a French army in England need not be considerable measure of public attention; but who has we find that seven-eighths of the carrying trade of the world contemplated. The object of the war should be to vindi ­ heard of any trouble or effort in sending the troops there, is in British vessels, it exposes a very vulnerable object cate the rights and position of France as a Mediterranean or supplying them 1 The French, who come next to our ­ to attack undoubtedly, but at the same time an object that Power, and to effect this only the navy, and perhaps a selves, make more fuss about the transport of ten thousand concerns the world generally, and not England only. corps d'armee , certainly not more, would be needed. The men from Marseilles to Algiers than we do if we send Would the world put up with this ? The world in the landing of twenty or thirty thousand men in Egypt would double the number to the remotest habitable quarter of abstract is a useless element; but would the world remain not be a work of insuperable difficulty, and this would the globe. in this abstract condition ? We can well believe that some entail the capitulation of the small British force engaged It may be argued, however, that France lies between Powers are jealous of us, and would bear a good deal; but there. That once effected, England would probably be us and Egypt. To this we should promptly reply that this is hardly true of all. America, for example, would glad to sue for peace, especially as her navy was not now practically we are between France and Egypt, It is suffer much, and apart from the Irish element, America in a position to cope with that of France. ” Taking this as only necessary to take a step forward to prove it. would probably wish us well. At all events, the stoppage a sample, it is interesting to examine the data on which France, to send an army to Egypt, must get them past of the cotton trade to England would cause a serious pinch, the soundness of this statement can be tested ; that is to Malta and our Mediterranean Fleet, then land them. and this might soon lead to sympathy, which would be the say, to look briefly at the relative strength of the French French writers appear to think that they could defeat our more valuable as it might take the shape at first of assist­ and British navies, and at our general position in the ships, a thought which we regard as only admissible on ance by telegraph information and irregular means, and Mediterranean. Lord Brassey’s “Naval Annual, ” which is the supposition that they caught us at a disadvantage, and then possibly it might swell into something much more on the eve of making its appearance, deals with the rela­ used torpedo boats with all the success that their advocates definite. The consideration of this, however, would tive strength of the fleets of Britain and those of other anticipate. It is necessary, however, to dispose of our draw us on into the discussion of a large question Powers, and puts a quantity of statistics in a compact form. fleet completely and beat us very badly to get their force unconnected with the immediate subject of our article. Until this appears we must make the best of such infor ­ landed. Whoever turns to a list of naval stations —say in A war in this shape with France would be serious mation as we pick out and shape to our purpose. the “Illustrated Naval and Military Magazine ”—or picks it enough. France herself would feel the stoppage of The first part of the statement we quote we may pass out of the “ Navy List,” will find in the Mediterranean at this her trade sufficiently to prevent such a war being over. We think with the writer that the British are not moment the Dreadnought, the Agamemnon, Alexandra, popular for long, in spite of the light-hearted way in likely to invade France, and that the French are not likely Orion, Superb, Temeraire, and Polyphemus, with the which some French writers speak of it. We can only com­ to invade England. The matter to consider seriously is Thunderer at Malta. These constitute a very awkward pare this language with the suggestion of some of our own whether France could so easily dislodge us from Egypt by ' force to dispose of so completely that the whole expedition officers that we have not sufficient ships, and that on that landing thirty thousand men in that country. There are and its supplies can quietly go on and force a landing. account we ought to have war with France, seeing that in three main elements in this question. (1) The relative The Polyphemus has 17 knots speed; if torpedo ships are times past our navy was largely strengthened by sources strength of our fleets as to fighting power. (2) Power of to prove so good as to give the French a great advantage, of supply found at the Nile and Trafalgar, adding that it organisation of transport. (3) The geographical position what a very unpleasant adversary this vessel would be is a fact that before these events it appeared as if our fleet of our possessions and ports on the Mediterranean. These to a large and necessarily slow expedition, It is was decidedly inferior to that of France both in number and questions are too large to deal with except in the merest to be borne in mind that any delay either before or quality. All this sort of language being put aside, war with outline within the space at our command; but perhaps it after war is declared, greatly increases the difficulty. France would be a grim and terrible thing. We have little may be useful to furnish this so far as means admit of it. India is a few days more distant from Egypt than France, doubt that there is too much good feeling and good sense in We will commence with the fleets. but practically it is very much closer, seeing that forces France to provoke such a catastrophe; but the bare pos­ The statistics of the British and French fleets are and supplies could be poured in with the ease and security sibility ought to spur us on to the construction of the singularly elastic. Experience has shown that with a pur­ of peace operations before war was declared, and without classes of vessels specially suited to protect our commerce. pose in view and a robust conscience a writer can classify much trouble after it. To land thirty thousand men in the ships so as to show almost any result he likes. Sir Egypt, then, France would have to muster her fleet unper ­ British Armour-clads available in the Immediate Future. Edward Reed, by reckoning only the citadels of our ships, ceived in the Mediterranean, to make war without a week’s Date and ignoring the whole tonnage outside the citadel, and notice, and then, without any delay, to destroy the British Displace ­ Armament. Name. of Speed. ment. Primary guns. by selecting a limit of 15in. thickness to the armour, which Mediterranean fleet entirely. Otherwise, she would be launch. arm our. just took in the French Devastation and Foudroyant, and cut up at sea, and also have a force overmatching hers M a x im u m ^OOCOHHONCOOCO |XD excluded our Devastation, Thunderer, and Dreadnought, waiting for her in Egypt. It may be objected that part tons. {■JHHHHHrlrlHiHH HHHHHHHrHHHCO was able to show in his first class 126,288 tons of French of such a force must consist of native troops, who would Hercules.. 8,680 8 —18-ton M.L. CO Monarch .. 8,320 S o ? 2—24 „ OO shipping against 51,570 British. On the other hand, we not face Europeans. The French have not found their CO Audacious 6,010 10—12 „ CO own “ Chasseurs Indigenes ” much inferior to their own OO have seen the line drawn at such a point as to tonnage that Invincible 6,010 10—12 „ GO Ol Sultan 9.200 8 —18 „ CO the proportion may be reversed.
Recommended publications
  • GMPR11 Ashburys
    Foreword • Contents Some of this country’s most significant nineteenth • and early twentieth century industrial enterprises Introduction .......................................................2 have disappeared leaving surprisingly little The Historic Setting ...........................................6 surviving evidence. This booklet highlights the 19th Century Industrialisation ..........................8 work undertaken as part of recent archaeological investigations looking at two adjoining areas of John Ashbury: The Early Years ...................... 10 the former Ashbury’s Carriage and Iron Works, Ashbury’s In Openshaw 1847-1928 ................. 12 Openshaw, Manchester. Established in 1847, Excavation Of The Foundry ............................22 Ashbury’s grew to be a major supplier both to Products Of The Ashbury Works .....................36 domestic and global markets of iron, steel, rolling stock and railway components. Apart from the Working At The Plant ......................................42 Ashbury’s railway station little or no visible Further Investigation ......................................44 surface evidence survives today of where the Glossary ...........................................................47 works once stood. The company’s archives also Further Reading ..............................................48 appear not to have survived. Acknowledgements ..........................................49 The fragmentary cartographic, documentary and photographic evidence for the history and development of Ashbury’s
    [Show full text]
  • Portraits from Our Past
    M1634 History & Heritage 2016.indd 1 15/07/2016 10:32 Medics, Mechanics and Manchester Charting the history of the University Joseph Jordan’s Pine Street Marsden Street Manchester Mechanics’ School of Anatomy Medical School Medical School Institution (1814) (1824) (1829) (1824) Royal School of Chatham Street Owens Medicine and Surgery Medical School College (1836) (1850) (1851) Victoria University (1880) Victoria University of Manchester Technical School Manchester (1883) (1903) Manchester Municipal College of Technology (1918) Manchester College of Science and Technology (1956) University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology (1966) e University of Manchester (2004) M1634 History & Heritage 2016.indd 2 15/07/2016 10:32 Contents Roots of the University 2 The University of Manchester coat of arms 8 Historic buildings of the University 10 Manchester pioneers 24 Nobel laureates 30 About University History and Heritage 34 History and heritage map 36 The city of Manchester helped shape the modern world. For over two centuries, industry, business and science have been central to its development. The University of Manchester, from its origins in workers’ education, medical schools and Owens College, has been a major part of that history. he University was the first and most Original plans for eminent of the civic universities, the Christie Library T furthering the frontiers of knowledge but included a bridge also contributing to the well-being of its region. linking it to the The many Nobel Prize winners in the sciences and John Owens Building. economics who have worked or studied here are complemented by outstanding achievements in the arts, social sciences, medicine, engineering, computing and radio astronomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Unitarian Members of Parliament in the Nineteenth Century
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Stirling Online Research Repository Unitarian Members of Parliament in the Nineteenth Century A Catalogue D. W. Bebbington Professor of History, University of Stirling The catalogue that follows contains biographical data on the Unitarians who sat in the House of Commons during the nineteenth century. The main list, which includes ninety-seven MPs, is the body of evidence on which the paper on „Unitarian Members of Parliament in the Nineteenth Century‟ is based. The paper discusses the difficulty of identifying who should be treated as a Unitarian, the criterion chosen being that the individual appears to have been a practising adherent of the denomination at the time of his service in parliament. A supplementary list of supposed Unitarian MPs, which follows the main list, includes those who have sometimes been identified as Unitarians but who by this criterion were not and some who may have been affiliated to the denomination but who were probably not. The borderline is less sharp than might be wished, and, when further research has been done, a few in each list may need to be transferred to the other. Each entry contains information in roughly the same order. After the name appear the dates of birth and death and the period as an MP. Then a paragraph contains general biographical details drawn from the sources indicated at the end of the entry. A further paragraph discusses religious affiliation and activities. Unattributed quotations with dates are from Dod’s Parliamentary Companion, as presented in Who’s Who of British Members of Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Jernbanehistorie Jernbanernes Teknologi- Og Kulturhistorie 2017
    REDIGERET AF LARS BJARKE CHRISTENSEN PETER FRANSEN GITTE LUNDAGER STEEN OUSAGER RENÉ S. CHRISTENSEN (ANSV.) JERNBANEHISTORIE JERNBANERNES TEKNOLOGI- OG KULTURHISTORIE 2017 DANMARKS JERNBANEMUSEUM INDHOLD 3 FORORD LOKOMOTIVETS GNIST 4 – brandfaren langs jernbanerne Af Lars Bjarke Christensen og Steffen Dresler GENTOFTEULYKKEN 24 – en æskefuld skæbner Af Halfdan Höner MODELTOG MED DAMP OG ELDRIFT I KØBENHAVN I 1840’ERNE 42 Søren Hjorths modeltogs-forevisninger i Industriforeningen 1841-43 og hans senere projekt til rigtige el-lokomotiver Af Poul Thestrup DANMARKS JERNBANEMUSEUMS 72 SAMLING AF RULLENDE MATERIEL Af René Schrøder Christensen ANMELDELSER 100 FORORD JERNBANEHISTORIE 2017 Velkommen til den femte udgave af Jernbanehistorie. Tids- er nu i sin sidste fase. Artiklen giver et overblik over proces- Jernbanernes teknologi- og kulturhistorie skriftet har en bred tilgang til den samfundsmæssigt vigtige sens forløb og tankegangen bag, og ikke mindst bringer vi Årsskrift for Danmarks Jernbanemuseum jernbanehistorie og søger at favne både den politiske, sociale, en liste over materiellet. Sidst i tidsskriftet har vi som sæd- tekniske, mentale og økonomiske historie. Det betyder, at vi vanlig en række anmeldelser af dansk og international jern- Årsskriftet udgives af Fonden Danmarks Jernbanemuseum gerne bringer artikler med vidt forskellig fagligt udgangs- banelitteratur. Dannebrogsgade 24 punkt, så længe omdrejningspunktet er jernbanen. I år har Jernbanehistorie bringer fagfællebedømte artikler, hvilket 5000 Odense C artiklerne et mere traditionelt jernbanehistorisk præg med vil sige, at artiklernes kvalitet bliver vurderet anonymt af en Tlf. 66 13 66 30 [email protected] fokus på teknologi og beslutningsprocesser. fagperson med en uddannelsesmæssig baggrund på mindst www.jernbanemuseet.dk Årets udgave rummer fire artikler – tre faglige og én af ph.d.-niveau.
    [Show full text]
  • La Formation Des Ingé- Anna Nieurs En Grande-Breta- E Guagnini
    La formation des ingé- Anna nieurs en Grande-Breta- e Guagnini. gne à la fin du XIX siècle. Traduction: Deux exemples à Manchester. Dominique Ebnôther. Résumé. Au XIXe siècle, les plus prestigieux établissements d'en­ seignement supérieur en Angleterre ne s'occupaient prati­ quement pas de formation professionnelle. Il n'y avait, par exemple, aucune tradition de formation théorique au métier d'ingénieur comme en France. Pourtant, à partir de 1860 environ, quelques établissements de nature très différente commencèrent à apparaître, surtout dans les villes industriel­ les de province. Comment ces établissements définirent-ils leur statut et leur rôle dans le milieu social et industriel environ­ nant et comment développèrent-ils leur structure interne pour offrir un type d'enseignement adapté aux futures professions industrielles P Manchester, qui vit la création de deux établis­ sements d'enseignement supérieur au milieu du XIXe siècle (l'Owens Collège et la Manchester Technical School), offre une occasion intéressante d'examiner l'évolution de la struc­ ture interne des écoles de la nouvelle génération, le dévelop­ pement de leurs relations avec la communauté locale et le pro­ cessus de spécification et de différenciation des buts et caracté­ ristiques des établissements eux-mêmes qui transforma finale­ ment leurs buts originaux. Depuis la publication en 1830 du livre de Charles Babbage Reflection on the Décline of Science in England, le retard pris par l'organisation de l'enseignement scientifique et technique en Angleterre et les effets durables de ce retard sur le déclin relatif de l'industrie anglaise font l'objet d'un courant continu de recherches et de débats.
    [Show full text]
  • Locomotive CAD Drawings by Euan Cameron EXPANDED CAPTIONS
    North British Railway Locomotive CAD Drawings by Euan Cameron EXPANDED CAPTIONS This document contains expanded captions to the NBR locomotive drawings produced by Euan Cameron. Please use the bookmarks to navigate to each caption page. Revised 23 March 2007 nbr038_1869_rebuild_Drummond_livery_dwg http://euankcameron.fotopic.net/p 38740316.html Engine wheelbase 7’ 6” + 7’ 10”: wheels 3’ 8” + 6’ 0” In 1869 Cowlairs works turned out two nominal “rebuilds” of R. & W. Hawthorn singles that comprised a great deal of material from other sources. Little is known about the first, No. 37, although it had the same wheelbase as its more famous sister locomotive No. 38. 38 clearly shared a large number of design features with William Steel Brown’s 2-4-0s of the Edinburgh and Glasgow Railway from 1862, later the N. B. R. 351 class (see below for Nos. 351-6). It had the same double frames with outside cranks, the unusual coupled wheelbase of 7’ 10”, the abnormally long eccentric rods to the valve gear, and the most unusual feature of the reversing lever being squeezed between the driving wheels and the outer splasher plates. However, the outside frames followed a different pattern and were spaced slightly differently from the 351 class. In this case the locomotive was left-hand drive, whereas the E & G engines were right-hand drive. This drawing is based on the General Arrangement of the rebuild, as below, with the boiler and superstructure inferred from the fine photograph taken by A. E. Lockyer at Cowlairs in the 1890s shortly before the rebuilding and from “working back” from the GA drawing.
    [Show full text]
  • Recognising Engineering Excellence
    RECOGNISING ENGINEERING EXCELLENCE. Engineering Heritage Awards Fifth Edition Improving the world through engineering FOREWORD The Institution of Mechanical Engineers is one of Looking forward, the Committee already have a number the world’s fastest growing engineering institutions, of interesting applications to consider which will keep with over 110,000 members based around the world. them busy well into 2015 and beyond. In addition to the Its role is to develop engineers to the highest calibre, continuing growth of the Engineering Heritage Awards, and facilitate the exchange of knowledge. Indeed, this the Committee will also be undertaking more work with principle was enshrined by our founding president, other bodies associated with the preservation of the George Stephenson, back in 1847. For an Institution with UK’s heritage. The 2015 ICON Awards promoted by the a long and distinguished history, it is important that Institute of Conservation will, for the first time, have we acknowledge the past engineering achievements of two awards specifically aimed at organisations and our members. Many will be recognisable to readers of groups conserving and preserving industrial heritage. this book, such as the Stephenson’s, Charles Parsons, Both awards are sponsored by the Institution and will be Sir Frank Whittle, Sir Nigel Gresley to name but a few. assessed by members of the Committee. Furthermore, However, for every famous engineer, there are many we will continue to engage with organisations such more who have made huge contributions to our industrial as English Heritage to find areas where we can help evolution with little recognition at all. It is the cumulative each other.
    [Show full text]
  • The Corkscrew
    THE CORKSCREW Newsletter of the WIMBORNE RAILWAY SOCIETY Founded 1976 Issue 55 February 2010 Above is Knighton built in 1861. This style of 0-4-2T locomotive was a standard Beyer Peacock product until 1879. Almost 100 years later, in May 1960, this brand new class AL2 loco E3046 is seen awaiting delivery to East Didsbury where it was stored until entering service in September 1960. E3046 to E3055 later became class 82 however E3046 (and E3055) had both been destroyed by fire before tops numbers were applied thus the remaining locos became 82001 to 82008. E3046 was damaged at Bletchley on 7 January 1971. Both pictures from official Gorton originals courtesy Graham Kelsey. WIMBORNE RAILWAY SOCIETY COMMITTEE MEMBERS. Chairman :- Graham Bevan…Vice Chairman :-...George Russell Secretary :- Chris Francombe…..Treasurer :- Judith Collings. Bryan Stanley…..David Leadbetter.....Iain Bell.....Martin Catford The Corkscrew team......Editor..Ken Aveyard....Production..Colin Stone Download The Corkscrew from www.wimrail.org.uk Contact The Corkscrew at [email protected] …............................................................................................................... Editorial Well here we are in 2010 and my sixth year at the helm of The Corkscrew and I think it will be a bumper year for our readers if all the promised contributions materialise. One of the most popular features from last year has been the appearance of The Corkscrew in glorious colour on the Society's web site, but this action may have repercussions for any budding author. In the past we have illustrated articles with photographs supplied by their authors, in some cases from their personal collection, where copyright of the photograph may have been unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • Daltons Manchester
    Dalton’s Manchester The First Industrial City Presented By Dr Richard Hills On 24th November 2009 John Dalton; born at Eaglesfield in the Lake District about 5 September, 1766, died in Manchester on 27 July 1844. His life spans an era of ex- traordinary scientific and technological development that has been char- acterised as the Industrial Revolution. When he was born, the fastest way a person could travel was by galloping horse. When he died, the network of railways with their express trains was spreading across the length and breadth of Britain. When he was born, industries such as textiles were handcrafts in peoples’ homes; the spinner at her wheel, the weaver at his loom. When Dalton died, there were cotton spinning mills of over 50,000 spindles and weaving sheds of over 1,000 looms. The unreliable sources of power such as wind and water had been re- placed by steam engines of over 500 indicated horsepower. These ad- vances were based on the development of technologies such as mechanical engineering, while scientific discoveries too were beginning to make themselves felt, such as chlorine for bleaching and the new art of photography. What was it that made Manchester so pre-eminent in so many industries during this period? What was it that made Manchester so attractive to ambitious people with the result that famous people in science and engi- neering should seek their fortunes in Manchester? I instance members of the Literary and Philosophical Society such as Peter Ewart from Dumfries, James Watt junior from Birmingham, Richard Roberts from Llanymynech, Wales, James Nasmyth from Edinburgh, Joseph Whit- worth from Stockport, Charles Beyer from Germany and even Dalton himself.
    [Show full text]