DOCSLIB.ORG

Bulletin of the Computer Arts Society Special Cache Issue Editorial Contents Summer 2004

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bulletin of the Computer Arts Society Special Cache Issue Editorial Contents Summer 2004 PAGE 57 Bulletin of the Computer Arts Society Summer 2004 Special CACHe Issue Contents Editorial Editorial 1 Welcome to issue 57 of PAGE. The last time I edited a copy was over 20 years ago. Back then the text came on phototypeset galleys of bromide paper and had to be cut Features out (with a real scalpel) and pasted down (with real cow gum) onto layout card. Much care needed to be taken The CACHe Project: to ensure everything aligned to the horizontal, Line art- Aims and Outcomes, Dr. Nick Lambert 2 work was drawn using a technical pen and the positions Routes Towards British Computer Arts: of photographs were indicated with grey rectangles to be Educational Institutions, Catherine Mason 5 stripped in later by the neg compositor. Colour was for- bidden - much too expensive! Computers, Poetry and the Nature of Art Robin Shirley 9 A few years later the Apple Mac arrived on the scene and the world changed forever. Today I’m sitting in front The Computer Arts: Origins and Contexts of my inexpensive iMac and Adobe’s InDesign software Paul Brown 11 enables me to lay out this copy of PAGE in a fraction of the time and with much greater flexibility than was ever possible back then. Reviews My nostalgia conveniently brings me to the subject of Harold Cohen at TATE Modern this special issue of PAGE. It’s a product of the CACHe Catherine Mason 14 project at Birkbeck College. This AHRB-funded research program is preserving and contextualising the early days Robin Oppenheimer on Lightshows of the computer arts and one of its outcomes was the Nick Lambert 14 recent re-formation of the Computer Arts Society and the British New Media at TATE Modern re-establishment of PAGE. Charlie Gere 15 I’m grateful to my colleagues on the CACHe project for It’s Cool to be Real! their support and assistance in preparing this copy of Paul Brown 15 PAGE and especially for their provision of much of the content. Also a big thanks to Robin Shirley for permis- sion to reproduce his presentation given in 1973 at the CAS event Interact at that years Edinburgh Festival. And Contributions to Alan Sutcliffe - PAGE Editor - for inviting us to put this Dance Notation for Animation special issue together. Stan Hayward 16 There’s also a things “To Do (Samsara)” section though, The National Fine Art Education Digital Collection given the three month frequency of PAGE, we will try and Stroud Cornock 16 keep a more up-to-date listing of events and opportuni- ties of interest on the new CAS website. This should be online soon! To DO (Samsara) 16 Paul Brown 19 Visiting Research Fellow From the Desk of the Chair Birkbeck College 19 About the Computer Arts Society May 2004 THE BACK PAGE 20 CACHe is: http://www.bbk.ac.uk/hafvm/cache/ page 1 PAGE 57 his PhD under Lansdown at Middlesex and was keen The CACHe Project: its aims and outcomes to see the pioneer’s work preserved. Paul began to frame an application to the AHRB – the Arts and Humani- Dr. Nick Lambert ties Research Board, which was moderated by Charlie and George. The AHRB awarded us a record grant of £250,000, the largest so far awarded to a single project. The CACHe project was begun to discover the extent of And it was granted on the first application, something nei- the pioneering effort, collate the most important works ther Paul nor Charlie expected! (centred on the CAS collection at SSL) and create a his- tory based on its findings. CACHe is investigating the early days of the computer arts in the UK from their origins in the 1960s to the 1980s, CACHe is an acronym for “Computer Arts, Concepts, His- when the first personal computers began to be used. The tories, etc.” Apart from the obvious computer memory project intends to archive, document and contextualise links, a cache can also be a hoard or collection of pre- the computer arts. Its principal goals are to recover this cious objects, usually concealed from view. All these history and confirm its cultural and aesthetic legitimacy. ideas inform what the CACHe Project is and what we do, because in a sense we are providing a memory for Com- CACHe aims to: puter Arts based on the concealed objects we have dis- • Recover the work of leading pioneers in the field of covered in the course of our research. But I’m jumping digital-based art in Britain ahead of myself here, so let me first explain why we came to be. • Identify artists, works, events and publications CACHe was first mooted because one of Britain’s leading • Document the contributions of artists, researchers, pioneers in computer art and graphics, John Lansdown authors, academics, institutions and publications the former dean of Middlesex University’s Faculty of Art and Design, sadly passed away in 1999. Lansdown had • Collect material to create a permanent national collec- been such a driving force behind the use of computers tion based on a number of archives, including that of in the arts that he spanned many fields, notably architec- the late John Lansdown, co-founder of the Computer ture, graphics and dance. Arts Society and a pivotal figure in this field during the 1960s-1980s In this field, as in many other areas which are seen as fringe art activities, people have an annoying tendency to • Construct a critical and historical context for the com- throw out key artifacts just because they are cluttering up puter arts the house or because their makers are now defunct. For- Enable access to this research through an online data- tunately, Lansdown left a significant archive to Middlesex base, books, videos/DVDs and other materials University at his death. However, much of his work and his art-related collections were not included in this archive CACHe’s work includes tracing and contacting people but remained with George Mallen at Systems Simu- associated with the field during this period, or their fam- lation. Here they formed part of the holdings of the ilies. In all cases, we are trying to build up a com- Computer Arts Soci- prehensive picture of the ety, founded jointly by digital arts in the 1960s and Lansdown, Mallen and 1970s in the UK and cross- of course Alan Sut- reference them to interna- cliffe in 1969, which tional developments. Our provided a meeting main outcomes are a place and focus for the scholarly book with many growing field of com- contributors, all either in the puter art in its field at the time or later crit- formative years. This ics; a popular book being archive contained the written by Paul Brown; a work of many artists, national archive to be writers and contribu- established from the collec- tors to CAS besides tions we’ve accumulated; Lansdown, and was and the possibility of an thus a unique record exhibition beyond 2007/8. of the interlinked per- It should be noted that at sonalities, ideas and the beginning, we though technologies that gave we had a nicely delimited rise to British compu- area to explore. We knew ter art. roughly the extent of the By early 2000, Paul Brown, himself a noted computer CAS archive at SSL and the Lansdown collection at artist and educator based in Australia, was searching for Middx; we also knew there was a further collection of a permanent home for this joint archive. Paul hoped to Lansdown’s papers and works in his old basement and save Lansdown’s archive and the CAS records in some we assumed there would be a scattering of personal institutional setting where they could be properly inves- papers with computer artists. But as our research pro- tigated and written up. He held meetings with the Arts gressed, we started to uncover – and receive! – vast Council, Science Museum, Museum of Photography and amounts of material that found its way out of people’s George Mallen. In late 2001, it was proposed that the lofts and cellars into our overflowing shelves. As each project should be based at Birkbeck College under the new collection came to light, so a much more complex aegis of Dr Charlie Gere, who runs a flourishing Digital picture of early British computer art emerged. Art History course there. Coincidentally, Gere had done page 2 PAGE 57 Some of it appeared in the earlier editions of the Com- puter Arts Society magazine PAGE, which we have dig- either by resurrecting the hardware or emulating it on itised, and other parts emerged quite unexpectedly to something more modern. Now consider how to approach complicate the nice neat picture we had initially assumed. a piece of art whose physical form may seem straight- A range of artists, designers and computer graphics pio- forward enough – a plotter output, say, or a sheaf of neers presented themselves. Most poignantly of all, the sprocket paper with lines of computer poetry. These phys- relatives of deceased artists who had lovingly preserved ical remnants we scan and present as graphics. But what their collections in the hope that someone might find them about the program that generated and delivered these useful began to come forward. Thus far we have discov- images or words? It is an absolutely essential part of the ered over a dozen major archives and numerous small art, indeed its fundamental basis and raison d’etre, in a personal collections, all tied together by an expanding sense, but without the computer that ran it (and often with- web of personalities and shared interests.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Visualiser: Intelligence Made Visible
    THE VISUALISER: INTELLIGENCE MADE VISIBLE Graham Howard, Design Director, System Simulation, Bedford Chambers, The Piazza, Covent Garden, London, http://www.ssl.co.uk Sarah Beecham, Director, Art of Memory, Bratch House, Station Road, Chipping Campden, Gloucestershire http://www.artofmemory.co.uk ICHIM 04 - Digital Culture & Heritage / Patrimoine & Culture Numérique Abstract (EN) Typically when we come across something new and complex we try and get a view of the whole, but when we know a field well we look for those particular aspects that concern us. Often to find our way through new territory we need guidance to help us navigate. At present most database driven web sites rely upon searching as a means of access. Accessibility is too often defined by what we cannot do, there is a real need to deliver new methods to make the breadth and depth of our worlds accessible to all. Searching is fine if you know what you are looking for, if you don’t, frustration can quickly set in. Browsing is often poorly served on such sites. This tends to exclude the non-expert. We believe that there is a need for a method of access, which encourages the non-expert to explore and understand the scope and depth of the material available on a site. We call this type of browsing ‘assisted browsing’. We are developing a tool called the Visualizer which enables assisted browsing. It sits on the top of repositories of information, whether of museum objects, learning objects or other data and produces an interactive conceptual map of the objects and their interrelationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Siggraph 1986
    ACM SIGGRAPH 86 ART SHOW ART SHOW CHAIR CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS Patric Prince Ellen Gore California State University, Los Angeles ISSCO Raymond L. Elliott Los Alamos National Laboratory ART SHOW COMMITTEE Maxine D. Brown Maxine Brown Associates SPACE COMMITTEE Donna J. Cox Darcy Gerbarg University of Illinois School of Visual Arts Paul Allen Newell Barbara Mones Abel Image Research Montgomery College Sylvie Rueff John. C. Olvera Jet Propulsion Laboratory North Texas State University Gary Walker Jet Propulsion Laboratory PROFESSIONAL ASSISTANCE Gayle Westrate Independent Deborah Sokolove Colman PHOTOGRAPHS Monochrome Color ESSAYS Herbert W. Franke John Whitney Ken Knowlton Frank Dietrich Patric Prince LISTS OF WORKS Tho-dimensional/Three-dimensional Works Installations Animations FRONT COVER CREDIT ISBN 800-24 7-7004 © 1986 ACM SIGGRAPH © 1985 David Em, Zotz I 1986 ACM SIGGRAPH ART SHOW: A RETROSPECTIVE Since the mid-Sixties, computer art has been seen in museums and galleries world-wide, with several recent major exhibitions. However, the pieces shown were usually the artists' newer works. It is appropriate and pertinent at this year's exhibition to show computer-aided art in the context of that which went before. The 1986 art show traces the development of computer art over the past twenty-five years through the work of artists who have been involved with it from its inception. The 1986 art show is the fifth exhibition of fine art that ACM SIGGRAPH has sponsored in conjunction with its annual SIGGRAPH conference. Patric D. Prince ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank Louise Ledeen for her support and advice, the Art Show committee for their billions and billions of donated hours, and the nucleus of dedicated volunteers who have worked diligently to produce this art show.
    [Show full text]
  • Cybernetics in Society and Art
    Stephen Jones Visiting Fellow, College of Fines Arts, University of NSW [email protected] Cybernetics in Society and Art Abstract: This paper argues that cybernetics is a description of systems in conversation: that is, it is about systems “talk- ing” to each other, engaging in processes through which information is communicated or exchanged between each system or each element in a particular system, say a body or a society. It proposes that cybernetics de- scribes the process, or mechanism, that lies at the basis of all conversation and interaction and that this factor makes it valuable for the analysis of not only electronic communication systems but also of societal organisation and intra-communication and for interaction within the visual/electronic arts. The paper discusses the actual process of Cybernetics as a feedback driven mechanism for the self-regulation of a collection of logically linked objects (i.e., a system). These may constitute a machine of some sort, a biological body, a society or an interactive artwork and its interlocutors. The paper then looks at a variety of examples of systems that operate through cybernetic principles and thus demonstrate various aspects of the cybernetic pro- cess. After a discussion of the basic principles using the primary example of a thermostat, the paper looks at Stafford Beer's Cybersyn project developed for the self-regulation of the Chilean economy. Following this it examines the conversational, i.e., interactive, behaviour of a number of artworks, beginning with Gordon Pask's Colloquy of Mobiles developed for Cybernetic Serendipity in 1968. It then looks at some Australian and inter- national examples of interactive art that show various levels of cybernetic behaviours.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the Computer Arts Society Spring 2005
    BULLETIN OF THE COMPUTER ARTS SOCIETY SPRING 2005 STEPHEN WILLATS: An Interview on Art, Cybernetics and Social Intervention George Mallen Background Stephen Willats is an artist whose works have explored new dimensions of the relationship between artist, audience and society. He has pursued the idea that the real function of art is to be a catalyst for changing thinking, the artist preferably anonymous and certainly working outside the conventional galleries framework. His works span a wide range - writings (he started and still publishes Control Magazine, his books include "Art and Social Function"), drawings, constructed electronic and interactive pieces and the important social or community projects. An exhaustive listing of his works is at www.lumentravo.nl/bio/stem.htm His early work did not use computers as such though he built his own special purpose devices to control his electronic pieces and the large-scale interactive works. His social project for the Computer Arts Society's INTERACT exhibition in Edinburgh in 1973 did however use a very early portable teletype terminal for the street interviews carried out in Leith and Edinburgh. This was highly innovative in those days. My interest in Stephen's work stems from his intuitive response to the complex issues linking art, technology and the artist's social roles, and his ability to move these forward through insight, technical capability and a broad social comprehension. I was trying to address such issues through the lens of science and had been impressed by the apparent solidity and confidence of his "way of knowing". The Cybernetic 60s Stephen and I are both uncertain when we first met.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Report
    Reviewing Machine Readable Labelling Systems for Collections Management and Access Final report by Julian Tomlin 14 March 2008 1 Reviewing Machine-readable Systems by Julian Tomlin - Final Report Contents 1. Introduction and Brief 3 2. Technological overview 5 3. Review 9 4. Potential for implementation in the partner museums 16 Decision-making aids 20 Appendices A. Case Studies 1. The Ashmolean Museum of Art, Oxford 23 2. The Children‟s Museum of Indianapolis (TCM) 26 3. Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge 28 4. Gemeentemuseum, The Hague 30 5. Great North Museum, Newcastle 33 6. MVWISE 37 7. Manchester City Galleries 41 8. National Museum of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 43 9. Norfolk Museums and Archives Service 45 10. The Petrie Museum, London 48 B. Database of Past, Present and Future Installations and Suppliers 52 C. Acknowledgements 59 D. Images 62 2 Reviewing Machine-readable Systems by Julian Tomlin - Final Report 1. Introduction and Brief 1.1 Purpose The London Museums Hub has commissioned this review of the use of machine- readable labelling systems across the heritage sector to evaluate the benefits of this technology both as a collections management tool and as a means of providing user access to collections information. The study focuses on the use of machine-readable technologies eg Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) and bar coding as methods to control object movements, update locations, enhance security and facilitate access to information associated with an object or collection of objects. 1.2 Brief The following is extracted from the Invitation to Tender document. Key objectives Research the methodology and practicality of RFID tagging or bar coding objects from different collection types as evidenced by the experience of current user museums and similar institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • From Mind to Machine, Computer Drawing in Art History
    FROM MIND TO MACHINE: COMPUTER DRAWING IN ART HISTORY Constructing rules or sets of pre-determined instructions to produce art, has precedents within art The computer like any tool or machine, extends human history. Influenced by aspects of Constructivism, Op capabilities. But it is unique in that it extends the Art, Systems Art and Conceptualism and Concrete art, power of the mind as well as the hand. methodologies were discovered that laid a foundation for Robert Mallary 1 computer arts to develop and provided an inspiration to artists working in a programmatic way. Further, this This exhibition presents three major pioneers of approach had relevance to the times – Cordeiro wrote computer art – Waldemar Cordeiro, Robert Mallary and that Concrete art and Constructivism were movements Vera Molnár, from three different corners of the globe – that “helped create a ‘machine language’ appropriate to South America, the United States and Europe. Although the communications systems of the urban and industrial each has an original style and distinctive approach, so cie ty.” 2 with these works can be seen a similar modernist aesthetic and common interest in exploiting the unique These artists were thinking about a systematic way of capabilities inherent in the computer. It is evident working before they had access to computers. Molnár’s that complex and visually arresting imagery can arise speaks of a “machine imaginaire,” her name for her from relatively simple sets of instructions. method of conceptualising a system to dictate the drawing, without having access to digital technology. Before the onset of personal computers, propriety software and the Internet, artists had to learn to Paul Klee’s process driven approach to drawing – “an programme, work with scientists and technicians and active line on a walk…”3 was also an inspiration to often construct or adapt hardware in order to create pioneers who found a parallel with the crafting of code their work.
    [Show full text]
  • Early British Computer-Generated Art Film BITS in MOTION
    BITS IN MOTION: Early British Computer-Generated Art Film BITS IN MOTION A programme for the NFT of films made by British pioneers of computer animation [INTRODUCTION] The earliest computer animators had no off-the-shelf software packages, Programme Notes no online tutorials and nothing to buy in a bookshop on how to make animated films using computers. When they began to experiment with 7 March 2006 computer-generated imagery, they had to gain access to rare and specia- lised mainframes and learn programming from the ground up. As pioneers, they were making the first steps towards the highly successful CGI animations of the 21st century. The practitioners in this survey were among those who forged alliances with scientists and institutions, learned to write code, built or customised their own hardware where necessary and discovered imaginative ways to bend the available technology to suit their creative requirements. Working with equipment designed for completely different purposes was a difficult task requiring long hours, dedication and a particular type of mind-set but it led to highly productive cross- disciplinary working relationships. These films remain important examples of the collaboration possible between artists and technologists in this period. The CACHe Project has rediscovered some of the very first efforts in this medium and this event, supported by the London Centre for Arts and Cultural Enterprises, hopes to make its origins better known. // Recently completed in the School of History of Art, Film & Visual Media at Birkbeck, University of London, the CACHe (Computer Arts, Contexts, Histories, etc) Project was supported by the Arts and Humanities Research Council and traced the inception, growth and development of British computer arts from its origins in the 1960s to the beginning of the 1980s (www.bbk.ac.uk/hosted/cache).
    [Show full text]
  • Operative Media (Art) Preservation
    OPERATIVE MEDIA (ART) PRESERVATION. Adopting to the techno- logical time regime Lecture at Media Art Preservation Symposium, March 23/24 2017, Museum of Contemporary Art (Ludwig Museum), Budapest [long version] Preserving the signal: Media theory in support of media art preservation Preservation of media art does not simply require care for the material endurance of the artefact any more. Preservation of time-based technologies itself must be processual, as an ongoing act of up-dating the analog or digital art work.1 Still, a media-archaeological veto insists: To what degree does the hardware of so-called "born-digital" art matter? That is the moment when conservation specialists ask for epistemological advice. It is the primary task of media theory to take philosophical care of technical terms like the "emulation" of early computational media art works by contemporary operating system. What seems evident on a practical level turns out to be a delicate challenge to the ethics of museum preservation. Media archaeology describes the techniques of cultural tradition and develops criteria for a philosophy of dealing with the tempor(e)alities of techno-logical agents. Any piece of media art is subject to time in its hardware embodiment (physical entropy), in its logical, almost time-invariant design (circuit diagrams and software codes), and in its actual time-critical processing. Any epistemology and aesthetics of media art preservation aks for the foundation of its arguments in the technological ground, against all seductions of reducing preservation of media art to its shere phenomenological appeal. There are different museological degrees for media art preservation: conceptual (design), functional (circuitry), and actually operative (time-critical) re-enactment.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatol Stern and Stefan Themerson. on Europa And
    Anatol Stern and Stefan Themerson and Stefan Anatol Stern Janusz Lachowski ANATOL STERN AND STEFAN THEMERSON. ON EUROPA AND THE FRIENDSHIP BETWEEN THE TWO AVANT-GARDE ARTISTS ON THE BASIS OF THEIR MUTUAL CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE YEARS 1959–1968 Anatol Stern (1899–1968) was a poet, one of the founders of Polish futur- ism, a prose and drama writer, literary critic, essayist and author of memo- rial sketches1 as well as a prolific scriptwriter and film journalist of the Pol- ish interwar period. His wife Alicja (1905–1993) was a translator of Russian literature, theatre critic, and columnist, also participating in film script writing. Towards the end of her life, she wrote a children’s book. Following her husband’s death, she took care of his manuscript collection, preparing previously unedited texts2 for publication and making their home archive available to literary researchers interested in Stern’s writing. Stefan Themerson (1910–1988) was a novelist, poet, essayist, philoso- pher, author of children’s literature, and composer; together with his wife Franciszka (1907–1988), he made experimental short films in interwar 4 Vol. 2016 Libraries Polish 1 Cf. i.a. A. Stern, Legendy naszych dni [The Legends of Our Days], Kraków 1969; idem, Poezja zbuntowana. Szkice i wspomnienia [Rebellious Poetry. Essays and Memories], revised and expanded edition, Warszawa 1970; idem, Głód jednoznaczności i inne szkice [The Craving for Unambiguity and Other Essays], Warszawa 1972. 2 Cf. A. Stern, Dom Appolinaire’a. Rzecz o polskości i rodzinie poety [Appolinaire’s Home. On the Poet’s Polishness and His Family], prepared for printing by A.
    [Show full text]
  • Dare to Be Digital: Japan's Pioneering Contributions to Today's
    Dare to be Digital: Japan's Author Jean Ippolito + 1.808.933.0819 Pioneering Contributions to Today's Art Department [email protected] International Art and Technology University of Hawaii at Hilo 200 West Kawili Street Movement Hilo, Hawaii USA 96720 A number of pioneering artists began experimenting with the com­ neer), Makoto Ohtake (architectural engineer), Koji Fujino (systems puter as a visual arts medium in the late 60s and early 70s when engineer), and Fujio Niwa (systems engineer). Komura was the only most fine-arts circles refused to recognize art made by computers as artist of the group, but the group's activities, as a whole, were of an a viable product of human creativity. This was the era of computer avant-garde art nature. All of the members were in their early twen­ punch cards, when the visual results of algorithmic input were noth­ ties. Reichardt describes their aim (stated in the group's manifesto) ing more than line drawings. Many of the forward-looking artists who as the restoration of man's innate rights of existence by means of were experimenting with this technology were not taken seriously by computer control.3 Most of their art pieces involved the transforma­ the established art venues, and were, in fact, often ostracized by tion of simple line drawings of well-known images, as in Running their peers.' More recently, the work of computer artists has begun to Cola is Africa, in which a contour drawing of a running man changes appear in general textbooks on the history of art, but each book fea­ to an outline of a Coca-Cola bottle and then to a line drawing of the lures one or two completely different artists.
    [Show full text]
  • Europeana Inside: Integration Status Report
    Europeana Inside: Integration Status Report Grant Agreement 297292 EUROPEANA INSIDE Integration Status Report Deliverable number D5.2 Dissemination level Public Delivery date August 2014 Status V1.0 Author(s) K-INT This project is funded under the ICT Policy Support Programme part of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme. V0.5 08/08/14 page 1 of 90 Europeana Inside: Integration Status Report Revision History Revision Date Author Organisation Description V0.5 2014-08-08 Neil Smith K-INT Synthesis of partner contributions. Initial draft of other sections. V0.6 2014-08-11 Laura Miles CT First Review V0.7 2014-08-20 Marco Streefkerk DEN Final Review Statement of originality: This deliverable contains original unpublished work except where clearly indicated otherwise. Acknowledgement of previously published material and of the work of others has been made through appropriate citation, quotation or both. V0.5 08/08/14 page 2 of 90 Europeana Inside: Integration Status Report Contents 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 4 1.1. Purpose ....................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2. Scope ........................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3. ECK Components and Architecture ......................................................................................... 4 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Continuity Between Computer Art History and Contemporary Art
    CAT 2010 London Conference ~ 3rd February Bruce Wands _____________________________________________________________________ CREATING CONTINUITY BETWEEN COMPUTER ART HISTORY AND CONTEMPORARY ART Bruce Wands Chair, MFA Computer Art Director of Computer Education Director, New York Digital Salon School of Visual Arts 209 East 23 Street New York, NY 10010 USA [email protected] www.mfaca.sva.edu www.nydigitalsalon.org Computer art was started by a small group of pioneering artists who had the vision to see what digital tools and technology could bring to the creative process. The technology at the time was primitive, compared to what we have today, and these artists faced resistance from the traditional art establishment. Several organizations, such as the New York Digital Salon, were started to promote digital creativity through exhibitions, publications and websites. This paper will explore how to create continuity between computer art history and a new generation of artists that does not see making art with computers as unusual and views it as contemporary art. INTRODUCTION The origins of computer art trace back over fifty years as artists began to experiment and create artwork with new technologies. Even before computers were invented, photography, radio, film and television opened up new creative territories. Many people point to the photographs of abstract images taken of an oscilloscope screen that Ben Laposky called Oscillons as some of the first electronic art images, which foreshadowed the development of computer art. While the system he used was essentially analog, the way in which the images were created was through mathematics and electronic circuitry. Another artist working at that time was Herbert Franke, and as the author of Computer Graphics – Computer Art, originally published in 1971, and followed in 1985 by an expanded second edition, he began to document the history of computer art and the artists who were involved.
    [Show full text]