Plan for the Second Phase of the Japanese Whale Research Program Under Special Permit in the Antarctic (JARPA

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Plan for the Second Phase of the Japanese Whale Research Program Under Special Permit in the Antarctic (JARPA <STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL THE OPENING PLENARY OF IWC/57> SC/57/O1 Plan for the Second Phase of the Japanese Whale Research Program under Special Permit in the Antarctic (JARPA II) - Monitoring of the Antarctic Ecosystem and Development of New Management Objectives for Whale Resources GOVERNMENT OF JAPAN ABSTRACT The Japanese Whale Research Program under Special Permit in the Antarctic (JARPA) was conducted between 1987/88 and 2004/05 austral summer seasons, under Article VIII of the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling. The IWC Scientific Committee conducted an interim review of JARPA results in 1997. In January 2005, a JARPA review meeting called by the Government of Japan was held. JARPA provided a wide variety of information on biological parameters of the Antarctic minke whale such as the natural mortality coefficient and changes over time in the age at maturity as well as narrowing down the parameters of relevance for sock management. JARPA also elucidated that there are two stocks in the research area but their geographical boundaries are different from those used by the IWC. Further, JARPA found that pollutant concentration in whale tissues, such as heavy metals and PCBs, was extremely low. JARPA has thus successfully obtained data related to the initially proposed objectives. The review meeting conducted in January 2005 agreed that results from JARPA are consistent with the behaviour to be expected of baleen whale populations competing for a dominant single food resource, krill. The meeting also agreed that the results obtained provide clear support for the need to take species-interaction (ecosystem) effects into account in understanding the dynamics of the baleen whale species in the Antarctic ecosystem, and predicting future trends in their abundance and population structure. Based on these considerations, the Government of Japan will launch a new comprehensive study under the Second Phase of the Japanese Whale Research Program under Special Permit in the Antarctic (JARPA II), combining lethal and non-lethal methods, starting from the 2005/06 austral summer season. The first two seasons (2005/06 and 2006/07) will be dedicated to feasibility studies. The practicability and appropriateness of sighting methods in the enlarged area and sampling procedures given the increased sample size and additional species will be examined. Methods for catching, flensing and taking biological measurements of large body-sized whales will be tested. The full-scale JARPA II will start from the 2007/08 season. It will be a long-term research program with the following objectives 1) Monitoring of the Antarctic ecosystem, 2) Modelling competition among whale species and developing future management objectives, 3) Elucidation of temporal and spatial changes in stock structure and 4) Improving the management procedure for the Antarctic minke whale stocks. JARPA II will focus on Antarctic minke, humpback and fin whales and possibly other species in the Antarctic ecosystem that are major predators of Antarctic krill. Annual sample sizes for the full-scale research (lethal sampling) are 850 (with 10% of allowance) Antarctic minke whales (Eastern Indian Ocean and Western South Pacific Stocks), 50 humpback whales (D and E-Stocks) and 50 fin whales (Indian Ocean and the Western South Pacific Stocks). During the feasibility study, a maximum annual sample size of 850+-10% Antarctic minke whales will be sampled. A maximum of ten fin whales will be sampled in each season. Humpback whales will not be taken during the feasibility study. The research methods for the JARPA II are basically the same as the previous JARPA with some modifications. The program involves both non-lethal research techniques such as sighting surveys, biopsy sampling, acoustic surveys for prey species and the collection of oceanographic data as well 1 as lethal sampling since collection of certain information, of vital importance to the overall study, requires examination of internal organs such as ovaries, earplugs and stomachs. A comprehensive review will be conducted following completion of the first 6 years of the research. Cruise reports will be submitted annually to the IWC/SC. 2 CONTENTS I. Introduction 5 II. Research background 6 1. Outline of the JARPA results 6 2. Global environmental changes 8 3. Necessity to improve the management procedure of Antarctic minke whale stocks 8 III. Research needs and objectives 9 1. Research needs 9 2. Research objectives 10 1) Monitoring of the Antarctic ecosystem 10 I) Monitoring of whale abundance trends and biological parameters 10 II) Monitoring of krill abundance and the feeding ecology of whales 11 III) Monitoring of the effects of contaminants on cetaceans 11 IV) Monitoring of cetacean habitat 11 2) Modelling Competition among whale species and future management objectives 11 I) Constructing a model of competition among whale species 11 II) New management objectives including the restoration of the cetacean ecosystem 11 3) Elucidation of temporal and spatial changes in stock structure 12 4) Improving the management procedure for Antarctic minke whale stocks 12 IV. Research method 12 1. Research area 12 2. Research period 13 3. Target whale species for lethal sampling 13 4. Survey methods and items 14 1) Monitoring of the Antarctic ecosystem 14 I) Monitoring of whale abundance trends and biological parameters 14 II) Monitoring of krill abundance and the feeding ecology of whales 15 III) Monitoring of the effects of contaminants on cetaceans 15 IV) Monitoring of cetacean habitat 15 2) Modelling competition among whale species and future management objectives 15 I) Constructing a model of competition among whale species 15 II) New management objectives including the restoration of the cetacean ecosystem 16 3) Elucidation of temporal and spatial changes in stock structure 17 4) Improving the management procedure for Antarctic minke whale stocks 17 V. Sample size 17 1. Antarctic minke whales 17 2. Humpback whales 18 3. Fin whales 18 VI. Feasibility studies 19 1. Necessity and objectives 19 2. Survey period 19 3. Survey methods 19 4. Sample size 19 VII. Effect on the stocks 19 VIII. Research vessels, research organizations and foreign participation 20 1. Research vessels 20 2. Research organizations 20 3. Participation of foreign scientists 20 IX. Necessity of lethal methods 20 X. Utilizing existing data 20 1. Data from commercial whaling 20 2. Data from JARPA 20 XI. Others 20 1. Processing of whale samples 20 2. Report to the IWC Scientific Committee 20 3. Whale killing methods 21 3 XII. References 21 APPENDICES Appendix 1. Composition of baleen whale species in the JARPA research area - Koji Matsuoka, Takashi Hakamada and Shigetoshi Nishiwaki 25 Appendix 2. What has happened to the Antarctic minke whale stocks? - An interpretation of results from JARPA - Yoshihiro Fujise, Hiroshi Hatanaka and Seiji Ohsumi 37 Appendix 3 Temporal and spatial changes in stock structure of baleen whale species in the Antarctic feeding grounds – Luis A. Pastene and Naohisa Kanda 53 Appendix 4. Monitoring of environmental pollutants in cetaceans and the marine ecosystem in the Antarctic Ocean and the western North Pacific Ocean. - Genta Yasunaga and Yoshihiro Fujise 57 Appendix 5. Hypotheses on the abundance changes of krill predators in the Antarctic ecosystem. - Hiroshi Hatanaka 61 Appendix 6. Sample sizes of Antarctic minke, humpback and fin whales required for statistical examination of yearly trend in biological parameters. - Takeharu Bando, Takashi Hakamada, Ryoko Zenitani, Yoshihiro Fujise, Eiji Tanaka and Hidehiro Kato. 63 Appendix 7. Sample size of Antarctic minke whale for the purpose of monitoring yearly trend of blubber thickness. - Kenji Konishi, Takashi Hakamada and Tsutomu Tamura 75 Appendix 8. Sample size required for genetic mark-recapture method to monitor population trend. - Naohisa Kanda 77 Appendix 9. Effect on the stock of the catches by JARPA II. - Takashi Hakamada 81 4 I. INTRODUCTION In 1982, the IWC adopted the moratorium on commercial whaling on the grounds of insufficient scientific knowledge concerning whales. The Government of Japan lodged an objection, but withdrew it in 1985, and the 1986/87 whaling season marked the last commercial operation in the Antarctic by Japan. Thereafter, all commercial whaling in the Antarctic has been suspended to this day. In order to resolve the scientific uncertainties and pave the way for the resumption of sustainable whaling, Japan started a research program, the Japanese Whale Research Program under Special Permit in the Antarctic (JARPA), under Article VIII of the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling. The main purpose was to elucidate biological parameters of Antarctic minke whales (GOJ, 1987). The program was launched in the 1987/88 austral summer season as a two-year feasibility study (1987/88 and 1988/89 seasons). The full program started in the 1989/90 season and it was a long-term program over eighteen years, including the two years of feasibility studies. Since all commercial whaling had been suspended in the Antarctic, the world's largest source of whale resources, JARPA was in effect the only comprehensive research program that provided a time series of useful biological and ecological information for the management of whale stocks in the Antarctic. The IWC Scientific Committee conducted an interim review of JARPA results in 1997 (IWC, 1998). It was agreed that information from JARPA has the potential to improve the management of Antarctic minke whales. In January 2005, a review meeting of JARPA was hosted by Japan, in which scientists from various countries participated. JARPA provided a wide variety of information on biological parameters such as the natural mortality coefficient and changes over time in the age at maturity as well as narrowing down the parameters of relevance for stock management. The program had also elucidated that there are two stocks in the research area but the geographical boundaries between these stocks are different from those used by the IWC to manage baleen whale species in the Antarctic.
Recommended publications
  • Iceland's Whaling Comeback
    Iceland’s Whaling Comeback: Preparations for the Resumption of Whaling from a humpback whale that was reported entan- 4.3. Contamination of Whale Meat 37 gled in a fishing net in June 2002 . However, ac- The contamination of whale meat with toxic chemi- cording to radio news Hagkaup halted sale shortly cals including heavy metals has drawn the attention afterwards, presumably because the meat had not of the public in several nations and the concern of been checked by the veterinary inspection. the IWC. For example, ten years of clinical trials of almost 1,000 children in the Faroe Islands have An unknown number of small cetaceans, mainly directly associated neurobehavioral dysfunction with harbour porpoises and white-beaked dolphins, are their mothers’ consumption of pilot whale meat killed in fishing nets. Regular entanglements of contaminated with high levels of mercury. Concerns harbour porpoises are reported from the inshore have also been expressed about the health impacts 38 spring fishery for lumpfish . One single fisherman of high levels of organic compounds including PCBs reported about 12 harbour porpoises being entan- in whale tissue. As a consequence, the Faroese gled in his nets and he considered this number to be government recommended to consumers that they comparatively low. reduce or stop consumption of whale products41. While the meat is often used for human consump- Furthermore, studies by Norwegian scientists and tion, the blubber of small cetaceans is also used as the Fisheries Directorate revealed that blubber from 39 bait for shark fishing . According to newspaper North Atlantic minke whales contains serious levels reports, small cetaceans killed intentionally are of PCBs and dioxin42, 43.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bowhead Vs. the Gray Whale in Chukotkan Aboriginal Whaling IGOR I
    ARCTIC VOL. 40, NO. 1 (MARCH 1987) P. 16-32 The Bowhead vs. the Gray Whale in Chukotkan Aboriginal Whaling IGOR I. KRUPNIK’ (Received 5 September 1984; accepted in revised form 22 July 1986) ABSTRACT. Active whaling for large baleen whales -mostly for bowhead (Balaena mysricetus) and gray whales (Eschrichrius robustus)-has been practiced by aborigines on the Chukotka Peninsula since at least the early centuries of the Christian era. Thehistory of native whaling off Chukotka may be divided into four periods according to the hunting methods used and the primary species pursued: ancient or aboriginal (from earliest times up to the second half of the 19th century); rraditional (second half of the 19th century to the1930s); transitional (late 1930s toearly 1960s); and modern (from the early 1960s). The data on bowhead/gray whale bone distribution in theruins of aboriginal coastal sites, available catch data from native settlements from the late 19th century and local oral tradition prove to be valuable sources for identifying specific areas of aboriginal whaling off Chukotka. Until the 1930s, bowhead whales generally predominated in the native catch; gray whales were hunted periodically or locally along restricted parts of the coast. Some 8-10 bowheads and 3-5 gray whales were killed on the average in a “good year”by Chukotka natives during the early 20th century. Around the mid-20th century, however, bowheads were completely replaced by gray whales. On the basis of this experience, the author believes that the substitution of gray whales for bowheads, proposed recently by conservationists for modemAlaska Eskimos, would be unsuccessful.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Whaling
    This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: In Pursuit of Leviathan: Technology, Institutions, Productivity, and Profits in American Whaling, 1816-1906 Volume Author/Editor: Lance E. Davis, Robert E. Gallman, and Karin Gleiter Volume Publisher: University of Chicago Press Volume ISBN: 0-226-13789-9 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/davi97-1 Publication Date: January 1997 Chapter Title: Modern Whaling Chapter Author: Lance E. Davis, Robert E. Gallman, Karin Gleiter Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c8288 Chapter pages in book: (p. 498 - 512) 13 Modern Whaling The last three decades of the nineteenth century were a period of decline for American whaling.' The market for oil was weak because of the advance of petroleum production, and only the demand for bone kept right whalers and bowhead whalers afloat. It was against this background that the Norwegian whaling industry emerged and grew to formidable size. Oddly enough, the Norwegians were not after bone-the whales they hunted, although baleens, yielded bone of very poor quality. They were after oil, and oil of an inferior sort. How was it that the Norwegians could prosper, selling inferior oil in a declining market? The answer is that their costs were exceedingly low. The whales they hunted existed in profusion along the northern (Finnmark) coast of Norway and could be caught with a relatively modest commitment of man and vessel time. The area from which the hunters came was poor. Labor was cheap; it also happened to be experienced in maritime pursuits, particularly in the sealing industry and in hunting small whales-the bottlenose whale and the white whale (narwhal).
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Bulletin No. 6. a History of California Shore Whaling
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME COMMISSION FISH BULLETIN No. 6 A History of California Shore Whaling BY EDWIN C. STARKS Stanford University 1923 1 2 3 4 1. A History of California Shore Whaling By EDWIN C. STARKS, Stanford University. It was once suggested to me that as there were still living a few of the men who took part in the old shore whaling operations on our coast it would be a desirable piece of work to get, by personal interview, a history of whaling at Monterey Bay. This I started to do, but with an accumulation of whaling data my interest led me to write a history of the shore whaling of the whole California coast, with an account of whales and whaling operations past and present. Though what material I have obtained from old whalemen has been of great value, I have found it impossible to get reliable dates from them. Hence this account, rather than an original contribution, may better be looked upon as a compilation of records found in old newspapers, books of travel, fish commission reports, notes and clippings in the Bancroft Library, and in such-like sources of information.1 Although we have known a certain amount about the whales of the north Pacific for a great many years, there is no group of animals of which we really know less, particularly as regards kinds or species. This is easily understandable when we consider the fact that we can not collect whales, as we do other animals, take them into the laboratory and placing them side by side make direct comparisons.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rms – a Question of Confidence?
    THE RMS – A QUESTION OF CONFIDENCE? - Manipulations and Falsifications in Whaling A review by Dr. Sandra Altherr, Kitty Block and Sue Fisher - 2 - RMS: A Question of Confidence? – Manipulations and Falsifications in Whaling Content 1. The RMS Process in 2005 and Remaining Questions ................................................................................ 3 2. RMP................................................................................................................................................................. 4 2.1. Tuning Level ............................................................................................................................................. 4 2.2. Phasing in the RMP.................................................................................................................................. 4 2.3. Current RMS Discussion on the RMP....................................................................................................... 4 3. Catch Verification through International Observers................................................................................... 5 3.1. Misreporting and Underreporting in Past Whaling Activities ..................................................................... 5 3.2. Manipulations of Sex Ratio and Body-Length Data .................................................................................. 6 3.3. Hampering of Inspectors and Observers .................................................................................................. 7 3.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Norwegian Bay Whaling Station
    Norwegian Bay Whaling Station An Archaeolo~icaI Ueport --- 1 S.Oickhart by Myra Stanbury /(j:-P()/2; - Dept. Maritime Archaeology Western Australian Museum 1983 No. :u - NORWEGIAN BAY WHALING STATION AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Myra Stanbury, Assistant Curator, Dept. Maritime Archaeology, W. A. Maritime Museum, Cliff Street, FREMANTLE, W. A. 6160 • Front cover: Sketch of Oil Storage Tanks S . J. Dickhart. CONTENTS Page Acknowledgements ii List of Figures iii Map References vi Introduction 1 Historical Background 1 Site Location and Access 8 Site Description and Survey 14 Findings 19 (a) Oil Storage Tanks and Environs 19 (b) Central area: workshops 25 (c) Southern area: residential 29 (d) Western area: jetties, slipways, flensing deck etc. 35 Summary and Conclusions 45 Appendix 1 Specifications of Whale Catching Steamers 46 Appendix 2. Liquidator's List of Equipment 47 Appendix 3 Whale Catches at Norwegian Bay 1913-1955 54 Appendix 4 Statement of Whaling Operations Carried out at Point Cloates Western Australia by the Norwegian Bay Whaling Company 55 Appendix 5 : Copy of Agreement with the Australian Workers' Union 56 Bibliography 62 i ACKNOIVLEDGEMENTS The author would like to express her thanks to Jon Carpenter (IV.A. Museum), Milton Clark, Syd Dickhart (M.A.A.W.A.), Peter Gesner (Maritime Archaeology Diploma Course) and Zoe Inman, for their assistance with the field survey and recording of field data; to Mr. & IVIrs Edgar Lefroy and Jane Lefroy of Ningaloo Station, for the use of their shearing premises and general historical information; to Graeme Henderson (Curator of Maritime Archaeology) and staff of the Maritime Archaeology Department for ad vice and photographic assistance, to the following persons who have kindly provided I?hotog-raphs, maps and information relating to the early whaling operations at Norwegian Bay, and have assisted in the identification of the various structures and artefacts: Les Coleman and Bill Stephens (formerly of Nor' West Whaling Co.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Pacific Coast Whaling
    19005 Coast Highway One, Jenner, CA 95450 ■ 707.847.3437 ■ [email protected] ■ www.fortross.org Title: A Brief History of Pacific Coast Whaling Author (s): Nicholas J. Lee Source: Fort Ross Conservancy Library URL: http://www.fortross.org/lib.html Unless otherwise noted in the manuscript, each author maintains copyright of his or her written material. Fort Ross Conservancy (FRC) asks that you acknowledge FRC as the distributor of the content; if you use material from FRC’s online library, we request that you link directly to the URL provided. If you use the content offline, we ask that you credit the source as follows: “Digital content courtesy of Fort Ross Conservancy, www.fortross.org; author maintains copyright of his or her written material.” Also please consider becoming a member of Fort Ross Conservancy to ensure our work of promoting and protecting Fort Ross continues: http://www.fortross.org/join.htm. This online repository, funded by Renova Fort Ross Foundation, is brought to you by Fort Ross Conservancy, a 501(c)(3) and California State Park cooperating association. FRC’s mission is to connect people to the history and beauty of Fort Ross and Salt Point State Parks. - ) y / ,. ; / / / ' • Fo rt Ross Interpretive Assn . Library 1UCHOLA3 J. r.r.:s 19005 Coast Highway "'? jU' r '·ri.;_t· x· 7 (· ·1 \1 Jenner, CA 95450 · ·~ EL (HlldADA~ C,.\.L!F., 94018. A BHI 2:F HISTORY OP' P!lCI:FIC ~OAS'l' ~...:1-?ALTI!G B,y Nicholas J. Lse ~~11ala!:> wn:re ca1;.ght. b,;r t~~ Indir..ns of the Pacific North · )~ast, ;J.till~ing sps cial 35 foot c~no•1 ~, hH:r-poons, lines And fJ.oats, ev~m by poi~cn.
    [Show full text]
  • A Collection of Kinship
    A Collection of Kinship Ethnographic drawing in Shetland Bérénice Carrington A Collection Of Kinship A gentle suite of subjective works mainly in watercolour and pencil, the results of a winter’s residency at the Owld Haa* on the island of Yell, Shetland. The pieces were conceived between September 2015 and March 2016. Most were produced in situ at the museum, but some came also from memory and photographs. They were exhibited at the Owld Haa Gallery during September and October 2016. Cover: Left - Detail: Ripper, flensing knife and Magellan Daisy Right - Detail: Gibbie Hoseason’s Penguins, photographer: B Carrington Portrait of carved penguin, 2015, 76 x 56 cm Within its collection, either under the provenance of these objects containing the bobbed hair of a glass, in cabinets or propped by contrasting them against young woman from circa 1920. up in the corner of a room the kindred articles from my personal Owld Haa displays whales’ teeth, background: a carved penguin a hair watch chain and a flensing from whaling days, a 1913 bayonet Whale’s teeth, Sooth* Georgia: blade. The drawings explore and sheath and a paper bag Leith, 2016, 46 x 51 cm Although they appear to be simple seemingly self-evident; beneath its basis in the prosaic, a Forget- compositions, the drawings are their commonplace purpose and me-not (Myosotis) drawn on the necessarily highly detailed and meaning there may lie another same plane as a hair watch chain arranged to set up a pictorial perspective. The inclusion of presents a pair of objects symbolic notion of the provenance of local flowers and mosses in some of enduring affection or love.
    [Show full text]
  • Meat Consumption from Stranded Whales and Marine Mammals in New Zealand: Public Health and Other Issues
    Meat consumption from stranded whales and marine mammals in New Zealand: Public health and other issues M W Cawthorn Cawthorn & Associates Marine Mammals/Fisheries Consultants 53 Motuhara Road Plimmerton Wellington Published by Department of Conservation Head Office, PO Box 10-420 Wellington, New Zealand This report was commissioned by Hawke's Bay, Wellington and Otago Conservancies ISSN 1171-9834 1997 Department of Conservation, P.O. Box 10-420, Wellington, New Zealand Reference to material in this report should be cited thus: Cawthorn, M.W., 1997 Meat consumption from stranded whales and marine mammals in New Zealand: Public health and other issues. Conservation Advisory Science Notes No. 164, Department of Conservation, Wellington. Keywords: Whales, seals, food preparation (marine mammal), meat quality assessment (marine mammal), flensing, pathogens, contaminants Abstract Interest in the use of stranded whales as a source of food and the use of seals for cultural purposes has been expressed to the Department of Conservation by Ngati Hawea and Ngai Tahu Maori respectively. The known and anecdotal history of consumption of whale and seal meat in New Zealand and elsewhere is briefly discussed. Comments on the palatibility of marine mammal meat and the use of whales and seals as food are presented. Post-stranding damage and carcass contamination result in unsuitability of meat for human consump- tion. Criteria for the assessment of meat quality from stranded animals are presented. The transmission of parasites, particularly Anisakis sp., and the cumulative effects of persistent pesticides and heavy metals from consump- tion of meat from species such as pilot whales is discussed. Meat collection and storage should be conducted under the same conditions and constraints applied to terrestrial mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • Artisanal Whaling in the Atlantic: a Comparative Study of Culture, Conflict, and Conservation in St
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2010 Artisanal whaling in the Atlantic: a comparative study of culture, conflict, and conservation in St. Vincent and the Faroe Islands Russell Fielding Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Fielding, Russell, "Artisanal whaling in the Atlantic: a comparative study of culture, conflict, and conservation in St. Vincent and the Faroe Islands" (2010). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 368. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/368 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. ARTISANAL WHALING IN THE ATLANTIC: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CULTURE, CONFLICT, AND CONSERVATION IN ST. VINCENT AND THE FAROE ISLANDS A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Geography and Anthropology Russell Fielding B.S., University of Florida, 2000 M.A., University of Montana, 2005 December, 2010 Dedicated to my mother, who first took me to the sea and taught me to explore. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation has benefitted from the assistance, advice, inspiration, and effort of many people. Kent Mathewson, my advisor and major professor, provided the kind of leadership and direction under which I work best, offering guidance when necessary and allowing me to chart my own course when I was able.
    [Show full text]
  • Iceland's Whaling Comeback
    ICELAND’S WHALING COMEBACK Preparations for the Resumption of Whaling An analysis by Dr. Sandra Altherr Iceland’s Whaling Comeback: Preparations for the Resumption of Whaling Summary After a pause of 14 years, Iceland plans to resume "scientific whaling", which, besides 320 fin, 320 whaling and trade in whale meat in the very near minke and 160 sei whales even proposed the hunt- future: Within the last three years Iceland has be- ing of blue and humpback whales in its original come a member of CITES (the convention that version. By this means, Iceland evaded the morato- regulates the international trade in endangered rium by using a loophole in the International Con- species), started to import whale products from vention for the Regulation of Whaling (ICRW 1946). Norway, rejoined the International Whaling Com- mission (IWC) with a reservation on the IWC mora- This report gives an overview of Iceland's whaling torium for commercial whaling and consolidated its history and exposes its recent steps to prepare the relations on fisheries and whaling issues with Ja- ground for a resumption of both whaling and inter- pan. In March 2003, Iceland submitted a plan for a national trade, with a focus on Japan’s market. two-year research whaling programme to the IWC, Resumption of whaling in Iceland would cause seri- involving the killing of 500 whales. This programme ous conflicts with whale watching, which recently may start as soon as summer 2003. Iceland’s Fish- has become a booming and lucrative income source eries Minister has stated that it is a precondition for for Iceland.
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Sperm Whales with Protruded Rudimentary Hind Limbs*
    NEW RECORDS OF SPERM WHALES WITH PROTRUDED RUDIMENTARY HIND LIMBS* TAKAHISA NEMOTO The first record of protruded legs in Cetacea is described by Andrews (1921) on a humpback whale caught in the off waters of British Columbia, Canada in 1919 which has remarkable protruded legs in the abdominal part of the body. As the second case having the pair of protruded hind limbs in Catacea, a very interesting case of the sperm whale with rudimentary hind limbs is reported by Ogawa & Kamiya in 1957 (Ogawa & Kamiya, 1957). This sperm whale has not such a remarkable protruded legs as the humpback whale reported by Andrews, but the protruded legs are forming protrusions which clearly elevated like a dome. The height of the protrusions measures 5.35 cm in the right and 6.56 cm in the left respectively. There is well developed tibia from the pelvic bone to the dome of the epidermis and the tip of this cartilaginous stick intrudes a little the blubber of the protrusion of the skin. The case is considered as a abnormal retention of the early embryonic state (Ogawa & Kamiya, 1957). In 1960, a sperm whale having such a protrusion is caught in the northern part of the north Pacific by Japanese whaling operation. The photograph in situ and description are remained but unfortunately the samples are missing and now under search. The sperm whale is caught on l 6th July in 1960, at the position 51-52N and 171-22£ in the north Pacific. The body length is 15.3 m and male testis weights are 5.3 and 5.1 kg.
    [Show full text]