DOCSLIB.ORG

White Paper on Management and Utilization of Large Whales in Greenland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
White Paper on Management and Utilization of Large Whales in Greenland IWC/67/ASW/X WHITE PAPER ON MANAGEMENT AND UTILIZATION OF LARGE WHALES IN GREENLAND THE GOVERNMENT OF GREENLAND MINISTRY OF FISHERIES, HUNTING & AGRICULTURE JUNE 2018 IWC/67/ASW/X Table of content: TABLE OF CONTENT: ...................................................................................................................................... 2 1. SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................. 4 2. INTRODUCTION TO WHALING IN GREENLAND .......................................................................................... 15 3. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF WHALING ACTIVITIES AND CATCHES UP TO PRESENT TIME ............................. 17 HUNTING OF LARGE WHALES BY EARLY GREENLANDERS ................................................................................................. 17 PELAGIC WHALERS (1922 – 1958) .......................................................................................................................... 18 COASTAL WHALING IN THE 20TH CENTURY ................................................................................................................. 18 BOWHEAD WHALE ................................................................................................................................................. 19 HUMPBACK WHALE ................................................................................................................................................ 20 FIN WHALE ........................................................................................................................................................... 20 COMMON MINKE WHALE, WEST GREENLAND ............................................................................................................. 22 COMMON MINKE WHALE, EAST GREENLAND .............................................................................................................. 23 MODERNISATION OF THE WHALING FLEET .................................................................................................................. 23 4. STATUS OF LARGE WHALES AROUND GREENLAND ................................................................................... 24 SURVEYS .............................................................................................................................................................. 25 COMMON MINKE WHALE ........................................................................................................................................ 26 FIN WHALE ........................................................................................................................................................... 26 HUMPBACK WHALE ................................................................................................................................................ 27 BOWHEAD WHALE ................................................................................................................................................. 27 5. REGULATIONS AND MONITORING ........................................................................................................... 28 LEGISLATION RELATED TO THE HUNTING OF LARGE WHALES ............................................................................................ 28 THE EXECUTIVE ORDER ON HUNTING OF LARGE WHALES ................................................................................................ 30 QUOTA SYSTEM .................................................................................................................................................... 31 MONITORING AND DATA COLLECTION ........................................................................................................................ 32 6. ANIMAL WELFARE: HUNTING METHODS, TIME TO DEATH AND LOSS RATES ............................................. 35 VESSELS WITH HARPOON CANNON ............................................................................................................................ 35 FIN WHALES WITH HARPOON CANNON ....................................................................................................................... 36 BOWHEAD WHALE WITH HARPOON CANNON .............................................................................................................. 37 HUMPBACK WHALE WITH HARPOON CANNON ............................................................................................................. 37 MINKE WHALES WITH HARPOON CANNON .................................................................................................................. 37 COLLECTIVE MINKE WHALE HUNT .............................................................................................................................. 39 DISTRIBUTION OF WHALE PRODUCTS ......................................................................................................................... 41 TIME TO DEATH, INSTANTANEOUS DEATH AND LOSS RATES ............................................................................................. 41 MEASURES TO REDUCE ANIMAL SUFFERING ................................................................................................................ 45 7. ABORIGINAL SUBSISTENCE WHALING (ASW) IN THE IWC .......................................................................... 49 WITHIN THE IWC CONTEXT ..................................................................................................................................... 49 IN A GREENLANDIC CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................... 51 FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS ....................................................................................................................................... 54 A CONSISTENT AND LONG‐TERM APPROACH FOR ABORIGINAL SUBSISTENCE WHALING ...................................................... 54 8. GREENLAND’S NEED OF WHALE MEAT ..................................................................................................... 55 EAST GREENLAND NEED FROM LARGE WHALES, PRIOR TO 1985 AND 1986‐2018 ............................................................. 56 EAST GREENLAND NEED FROM LARGE WHALES 2019‐2025 .......................................................................................... 57 WEST GREENLAND NEED FROM LARGE WHALES, PRIOR TO 1985 AND 2019‐2025 ........................................................... 58 ENVIRONMENTAL AND HEALTH REASONS FOR CONSUMING WHALE MEAT IN GREENLAND ..................................................... 64 2 IWC/67/ASW/X 9. BIOLOGICAL ADVICE ON CATCHES OF LARGE WHALES IN GREENLAND ...................................................... 66 10. CONCLUDING REMARKS ......................................................................................................................... 67 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................................ 69 APPENDIX I .................................................................................................................................................. 73 SUMMARY OF THE POINTS RELEVANT TO LIMITATIONS OF CATCH, MONITORING OF QUOTA AND HUMAN KILLING METHODS, FROM THE “THE GOVERNMENT OF GREENLAND’S EXECUTIVE ORDER NR. 12 OF 22 OF DECEMBER 2014 ON THE HUNT OF LARGE WHALES” ............................................................................................................................................................. 73 APPENDIX II ................................................................................................................................................. 76 THE IMPORTANCE OF WHALE MEAT AND BLUBBER TO THE DIET OF GREENLANDERS ............................................................. 76 APPENDIX III ................................................................................................................................................ 82 DOCUMENTATION ON GREENLAND WHALING SUBMITTED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF GREENLAND TO THE IWC, 1979 – 2018 .. 82 APPENDIX IV ............................................................................................................................................... 91 WEST GREENLANDIC CATCHES 2013‐2017 SUBMITTED TO THE IWC DATABASE ............................................................... 91 WEST GREENLANDIC CATCHES 2008‐2012 SUBMITTED TO THE IWC DATABASE ............................................................... 92 WEST GREENLANDIC CATCHES 2003‐2007 SUBMITTED TO THE IWC DATABASE ............................................................... 92 APPENDIX V ................................................................................................................................................ 93 THE 63. ANNUAL MEETING OF THE INTERNATIONAL WHALING COMMISSION: ................................................................... 93 RANGE STATE CONSULTATION ‐ ADDRESSING GREENLAND’S ABORIGINAL SUBSISTENCE QUOTA ON HUMPBACK WHALE, 2011 .... 93 RANGE STATE ....................................................................................................................................................... 93 III) HUMPBACK WHALES IN GREENLAND .................................................................................................................... 95 V) OTHER HUMAN INDUCES
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Iceland's Whaling Comeback
    Iceland’s Whaling Comeback: Preparations for the Resumption of Whaling from a humpback whale that was reported entan- 4.3. Contamination of Whale Meat 37 gled in a fishing net in June 2002 . However, ac- The contamination of whale meat with toxic chemi- cording to radio news Hagkaup halted sale shortly cals including heavy metals has drawn the attention afterwards, presumably because the meat had not of the public in several nations and the concern of been checked by the veterinary inspection. the IWC. For example, ten years of clinical trials of almost 1,000 children in the Faroe Islands have An unknown number of small cetaceans, mainly directly associated neurobehavioral dysfunction with harbour porpoises and white-beaked dolphins, are their mothers’ consumption of pilot whale meat killed in fishing nets. Regular entanglements of contaminated with high levels of mercury. Concerns harbour porpoises are reported from the inshore have also been expressed about the health impacts 38 spring fishery for lumpfish . One single fisherman of high levels of organic compounds including PCBs reported about 12 harbour porpoises being entan- in whale tissue. As a consequence, the Faroese gled in his nets and he considered this number to be government recommended to consumers that they comparatively low. reduce or stop consumption of whale products41. While the meat is often used for human consump- Furthermore, studies by Norwegian scientists and tion, the blubber of small cetaceans is also used as the Fisheries Directorate revealed that blubber from 39 bait for shark fishing . According to newspaper North Atlantic minke whales contains serious levels reports, small cetaceans killed intentionally are of PCBs and dioxin42, 43.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Mammals of Hudson Strait the Following Marine Mammals Are Common to Hudson Strait, However, Other Species May Also Be Seen
    Marine Mammals of Hudson Strait The following marine mammals are common to Hudson Strait, however, other species may also be seen. It’s possible for marine mammals to venture outside of their common habitats and may be seen elsewhere. Bowhead Whale Length: 13-19 m Appearance: Stocky, with large head. Blue-black body with white markings on the chin, belly and just forward of the tail. No dorsal fin or ridge. Two blow holes, no teeth, has baleen. Behaviour: Blow is V-shaped and bushy, reaching 6 m in height. Often alone but sometimes in groups of 2-10. Habitat: Leads and cracks in pack ice during winter and in open water during summer. Status: Special concern Beluga Whale Length: 4-5 m Appearance: Adults are almost entirely white with a tough dorsal ridge and no dorsal fin. Young are grey. Behaviour: Blow is low and hardly visible. Not much of the body is visible out of the water. Found in small groups, but sometimes hundreds to thousands during annual migrations. Habitat: Found in open water year-round. Prefer shallow coastal water during summer and water near pack ice in winter. Killer Whale Status: Endangered Length: 8-9 m Appearance: Black body with white throat, belly and underside and white spot behind eye. Triangular dorsal fin in the middle of the back. Male dorsal fin can be up to 2 m in high. Behaviour: Blow is tall and column shaped; approximately 4 m in height. Narwhal Typically form groups of 2-25. Length: 4-5 m Habitat: Coastal water and open seas, often in water less than 200 m depth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Last Time Akida Pulat Saw Her Mother
    EARNING YOUR TRUST, EVERY DAY. 07.18.20 VOLUME 35 NUMBER 13 CHINA’S UNHEARD VICTIMS THE LAST TIME AKIDA PULAT SAW HER MOTHER WAS IN 2016 P. 54 COVID-19: “THE MAIN PROBLEM WE HAVE HAD IS WITH POLITICIANS WHO CHOSE TO SACRIFICE NURSING HOME RESIDENTS.” —P. 42 —P. RESIDENTS.” HOME NURSING SACRIFICE TO POLITICIANS CHOSE WHO WITH IS HAD HAVE WE PROBLEM MAIN “THE COVID-19: FEATURES 07.18.20 VOLUME 35 NUMBER 13 42 HOUSES OF DEATH Small Belgium has the highest COVID-19 mortality rate in the world, raising questions about restrictive protocols surrounding nursing homes by Mindy Belz 40 48 54 60 LISTENING TO THE WAITING OUT A PANDEMIC A CULTURAL GENOCIDE REASONABLE UNHEARD In 2019, the U.S. organ BEFORE OUR EYES ACCOMMODATION The news cycle is loud, transplant program logged its The Uighur diaspora is The Americans With but we need to hear seventh consecutive year speaking out as family Disabilities Act, which turns those who can’t shout of record-high transplants. members disappear into 30 this month, steered Jim by Michael Reneau The coronavirus threatens reeducation camps in Terry toward a more to reverse that trend Xinjiang, but will the accessible career by Charissa Koh and world listen? by Kim Henderson Daniel James Devine by June Cheng KENZO TRIBOUILLARD/AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES 07.18.20 WORLD DEPARTMENTS 07.18.20 VOLUME 35 NUMBER 13 5 MAILBAG 8 NOTES FROM THE CEO 23 TOM HANKS IN GREYHOUND Dispatches Culture Notebook 13 NEWS ANALYSIS 23 MOVIES & TV 65 BUSINESS The coronavirus spiked Greyhound, The Last Looters and arson in the the movie blockbuster Tree, My Spy, In the THE WORLD Twin Cities destroyed a season, but drama is Footsteps of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Variation of Bowhead Whale Progesterone Concentrations Across Demographic Groups and Sample Matrices
    Vol. 22: 61–72, 2013 ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH Published online November 7 doi: 10.3354/esr00537 Endang Species Res FREEREE ACCESSCCESS Variation of bowhead whale progesterone concentrations across demographic groups and sample matrices Nicholas M. Kellar1,*, Jennifer Keliher1, Marisa L. Trego1,2, Krista N. Catelani1,2, Cyd Hanns3, J. C. ‘Craig’ George3, Cheryl Rosa3 1Protected Resources Division, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Services, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 8901 La Jolla Shores Dr., La Jolla, California 92037, USA 2Ocean Associates, 4007 N. Abingdon St., Arlington, Virginia 22207, USA 3North Slope Borough, Department of Wildlife Management, PO Box 69, Barrow, Alaska 99723, USA ABSTRACT: Bowhead whale Balaena mysticetus progesterone concentrations were measured in different sample matrices (serum, blubber, and urine) to investigate (1) concordance among sam- ple type and (2) variation among life-history class. Samples were collected from subsistence- hunted whales (n = 86) taken from 1999 to 2009. In general, irrespective of sample matrix, preg- nant females had the highest concentrations by orders of magnitude, followed by mature animals of both sexes, and subadults had the lowest concentrations. Subadult males and females had sim- ilar progesterone concentrations in all sample matrices measured. When pregnant animals were included in our analyses, permuted regression models indicated a strong positive relationship between serum and blubber progesterone levels (r2 = 0.894, p = 0.0002). When pregnant animals were not included, we found no significant relationship between serum and blubber levels (r2 = 0.025, p = 0.224). These results suggest that progesterone concentrations are mirrored in these sample types over longer periods (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bowhead Vs. the Gray Whale in Chukotkan Aboriginal Whaling IGOR I
    ARCTIC VOL. 40, NO. 1 (MARCH 1987) P. 16-32 The Bowhead vs. the Gray Whale in Chukotkan Aboriginal Whaling IGOR I. KRUPNIK’ (Received 5 September 1984; accepted in revised form 22 July 1986) ABSTRACT. Active whaling for large baleen whales -mostly for bowhead (Balaena mysricetus) and gray whales (Eschrichrius robustus)-has been practiced by aborigines on the Chukotka Peninsula since at least the early centuries of the Christian era. Thehistory of native whaling off Chukotka may be divided into four periods according to the hunting methods used and the primary species pursued: ancient or aboriginal (from earliest times up to the second half of the 19th century); rraditional (second half of the 19th century to the1930s); transitional (late 1930s toearly 1960s); and modern (from the early 1960s). The data on bowhead/gray whale bone distribution in theruins of aboriginal coastal sites, available catch data from native settlements from the late 19th century and local oral tradition prove to be valuable sources for identifying specific areas of aboriginal whaling off Chukotka. Until the 1930s, bowhead whales generally predominated in the native catch; gray whales were hunted periodically or locally along restricted parts of the coast. Some 8-10 bowheads and 3-5 gray whales were killed on the average in a “good year”by Chukotka natives during the early 20th century. Around the mid-20th century, however, bowheads were completely replaced by gray whales. On the basis of this experience, the author believes that the substitution of gray whales for bowheads, proposed recently by conservationists for modemAlaska Eskimos, would be unsuccessful.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 Polar Bear Harvesting in Baffin Bay and Kane Basin: a Summary of Historical Harvest and Harvest Reporting, 1993 to 2014
    Chapter 8 SWG Final Report CHAPTER 8 POLAR BEAR HARVESTING IN BAFFIN BAY AND KANE BASIN: A SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL HARVEST AND HARVEST REPORTING, 1993 TO 2014 KEY FINDINGS Both Canada (Nunavut) and Greenland harvest from the shared subpopulations of polar • bears in Baffin Bay and Kane Basin. During 1993-2005 (i.e., before quotas were introduced in Greenland) the combined • annual harvest averaged 165 polar bears (range: 120-268) from the Baffin Bay subpopulation and 12 polar bears (range: 6-26) from Kane Basin (for several of the years, harvest reported from Kane Basin was based on an estimate). During 2006-2014 the combined annual harvest averaged 161 (range: 138-176) from • Baffin Bay and 6 (range: 3-9) polar bears from Kane Basin. Total harvest peaked between 2002 and 2005 coinciding with several events in harvest • reporting and harvest management in both Canada and Greenland. In Baffin Bay the sex ratio of the combined harvest has remained around 2:1 (male: • females) with an annual mean of 35% females amongst independent bears. In Kane Basin the sex composition of the combined harvest was 33% females overall for • the period 1993-2014. The estimated composition of the harvest since the introduction of a quota in Greenland is 44% female but the factual basis for estimation of the sex ratio in the harvest is weak. In Greenland the vast majority of bears are harvested between January and June in Baffin • Bay and Kane Basin whereas in Nunavut ca. 40% of the harvest in Baffin Bay is in the summer to fall (August – November) while bears are on or near shore.
    [Show full text]
  • The Veterinary and Food Authority of Greenland
    Aalisarnermut, Piniarnermut Nunalerinermullu Naalakkersuisoqarfik Departementet for Fiskeri, Fangst og Landbrug Uumasunik Nakorsaqarfik Inuussutissalerinermullu Oqartussaaffik (UNIO) Veterinær- og Fødevaremyndigheden i Grønland (VFMG) The Veterinary and Food Authority of Greenland (VFMG) under the Ministry of Fisheries, Hunting and Agriculture has issued the following guidelines for bringing dogs and/or cats into Greenland. The guidelines also cover travelling with these animals within Greenland. In order to protect the Greenlandic Sled Dog as a breed Act no. 18 of 30 October 1998 establishes a so called sled dog district. The territory is defined as follows: th ● North of Greenland on the West Coast from north of 66 ​ northern degree of latitude, ​ th ● The entire East Coast down to Kap Farvel, east of the 44 ​ western degree of longitude. ​ Within this district, only Greenlandic Sled Dogs may be kept and it is strictly prohibited to bring other dogs into these areas. This concerns both dogs travelling onboard cruise ships with tourists and local dogs travelling within Greenland. In accordance to Article 19, subsection 2 of Act no. 18 of 30th October 1998 by Greenland´s Home Rule regarding sled dogs, it is prohibited to introduce dogs of any race into the sled dog districts. The same Article states that it is prohibited to reintroduce Greenlandic Sled Dogs once they have left the sled dog district. Working dogs and service dogs for disabled people may be permitted admittance to the sled dog district, but only after receiving a permit from the Government of Greenland. Working dogs are solely defined as the dogs used by police or by the authorities in relation to border control.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Dokument
    Udskriftsdato: 2. oktober 2021 BEK nr 517 af 23/05/2018 (Historisk) Bekendtgørelse om ændring af den fortegnelse over valgkredse, der indeholdes i lov om folketingsvalg i Grønland Ministerium: Social­ og Indenrigsministeriet Journalnummer: Økonomi­ og Indenrigsmin., j.nr. 2017­5132 Senere ændringer til forskriften LBK nr 916 af 28/06/2018 Bekendtgørelse om ændring af den fortegnelse over valgkredse, der indeholdes i lov om folketingsvalg i Grønland I medfør af § 8, stk. 1, i lov om folketingsvalg i Grønland, jf. lovbekendtgørelse nr. 255 af 28. april 1999, fastsættes: § 1. Fortegnelsen over valgkredse i Grønland affattes som angivet i bilag 1 til denne bekendtgørelse. § 2. Bekendtgørelsen træder i kraft den 1. juni 2018. Stk. 2. Bekendtgørelse nr. 476 af 17. maj 2011 om ændring af den fortegnelse over valgkredse, der indeholdes i lov om folketingsvalg i Grønland, ophæves. Økonomi- og Indenrigsministeriet, den 23. maj 2018 Simon Emil Ammitzbøll-Bille / Christine Boeskov BEK nr 517 af 23/05/2018 1 Bilag 1 Ilanngussaq Fortegnelse over valgkredse i hver kommune Kommuneni tamani qinersivinnut nalunaarsuut Kommune Valgkredse i Valgstedet eller Valgkredsens område hver kommune afstemningsdistrikt (Tilknyttede bosteder) (Valgdistrikt) (Afstemningssted) Kommune Nanortalik 1 Nanortalik Nanortalik Kujalleq 2 Aappilattoq (Kuj) Aappilattoq (Kuj) Ikerasassuaq 3 Narsaq Kujalleq Narsaq Kujalleq 4 Tasiusaq (Kuj) Tasiusaq (Kuj) Nuugaarsuk Saputit Saputit Tasia 5 Ammassivik Ammassivik Qallimiut Qorlortorsuaq 6 Alluitsup Paa Alluitsup Paa Alluitsoq Qaqortoq
    [Show full text]
  • Aboriginal Subsistence Whaling in Greenland: the Case of Qeqertarsuaq Municipality in West Greenland RICHARD A
    ARCTIC VOL, NO. 2 (JUNE 1993) P. 144-1558 Aboriginal Subsistence Whaling in Greenland: The Case of Qeqertarsuaq Municipality in West Greenland RICHARD A. CAULFIELD’ (Received 10 December 1991; accepted in revised form 3 November 1992) ABSTRACT. Policy debates in the International Whaling Commission (IWC) about aboriginal subsistence whalingon focus the changing significance of whaling in the mixed economies of contemporaryInuit communities. In Greenland, Inuit hunters have taken whales for over 4OOO years as part of a multispecies pattern of marine harvesting. However, ecological dynamics, Euroamerican exploitation of the North Atlantic bowhead whale (Buhem mysticem),Danish colonial policies, and growing linkages to the world economy have drastically altered whaling practices. Instead of using the umiuq and hand-thrown harpoons, Greenlandic hunters today use harpoon cannons mountedon fishing vessels and fiberglass skiffs with powerful outboard motors. Products from minke whales (Bahenopteru ucutorostrutu)and fin whales (Bulaenopteru physulus) provide both food for local consumption and limited amountsof cash, obtained throughthe sale of whale products for food to others. Greenlanders view this practice as a form of sustainable development, where local renewable resources are used to support livelihoods that would otherwise be dependent upon imported goods. Export of whale products from Greenland is prohibited by law. However, limited trade in whale products within the country is consistent with longstandmg Inuit practices of distribution and exchange. Nevertheless, within thecritics IWC argue that evenlimited commoditization of whale products could lead to overexploitation should hunters seek to pursue profit-maximization strategies. Debates continue about the appro- priateness of cash and commoditization in subsistence whaling and about the ability of indigenous management regimes to ensure the protection of whalestocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Nr 110 Udskrivningspcter 2018.Pdf
    Namminersorlutik Oqartussat - Grønlands Selvstyre Nalunaarut/Meddelelse Akileraartarnermut Aqutsisoqarfik – Skattestyrelsen Nr.: 110 Ulloq / Dato: 1. december 2017 Qupp. / Side: 1 af 2 Pillugu: Ukiumut aningaasarsiorfiusumut 2018-imut procentit akileraarusiissutissat. Matumuuna nalunaarutigineqassaaq kommunit Inatsisartullu ukiumut aningaasarsiorfiusumut 2018- imut procentit akileraarusiissutissat ima angissusilermatigik: Kommunimut akileraarut – Nuna tamakkerlugu akileraarut – Nuna tamakkerlugu immikkut akileraarut – Kommuninut ataatsimut akileraarut. Kommune akileraarfik: Kommunip Kommunimut Nuna tamak- Kommuninut Procentit akileraa- normua: akileraarut: kerlugu akile- ataatsimut rusiissutissat katillu- raarut: akileraarut: git: Kommune Kujalleq 31 28 10 6 44 Kommuneqarfik Sermersooq 32 26 10 6 42 Qeqqata Kommunia 33 26 10 6 42 Kommune Qeqertalik 36 28 10 6 44 Avannaata Kommunia 37 28 10 6 44 Kommunit aggornerisa avataani inissisimasut: ”Kommune” akileraar- ”Kommunip” Nuna tamakkerlugu Nuna tamakkerlu- Procenti akileraa- fik: normua: immikkut akileraarut: gu akileraarut: rusiissutissaq katil- lugu: Akileraartarnermut Aqutsisoqarfik 20 26 10 36 Selskabit akileraarutaat: 30% Iluanaarutisianit akileraarut: Selskabip kommune akileraarfiani procenti akileraarusiissutissap tamarmiusup naligaa – takuuk Akileraartarnermi Pisortaqarfiup immikkut nalunaarutaa nr. 240. Tamakkiisumik akileraarut: 35%. Tamakkiisumik akileraarut inunnit, aningaasarsianit akileraa- rutit pillugit inatsimmi § 72 a-mi aamma § 72 b-mi taaneqartunit akilerneqassaaq. Namminersorlutik
    [Show full text]
  • Allattoqarfik / Sekretariatet Esther Lennert
    Avannata Kommunia – Upernavik Napparsimaviup Aqq. B-915 3962 Upernavik Normu pingaarneq – Hovednummer 70 18 00 Allattoqarfik / Sekretariatet Esther Lennert Servicecenterleder – 59 02 04 38 79 02 [email protected] David Karlsen Overassistent 38 79 07 [email protected] Ole Johnsen IT-medarbejder – 59 04 47 38 79 09 [email protected] Oline Thorgæussen Pedel 38 79 37 [email protected] Sullissivi Nuka Johnsen Afdelingsleder 38 78 81 [email protected] Johan Pele Mathæussen Overassistent 38 78 82 [email protected] Helga Karlsen Overassistent 38 78 83 [email protected] Susanne Svendsen Overassistent 38 78 84 [email protected] Ataatsimiittarfik Mødesal 38 79 23 Aningaasaqarnermut immikkoortortaqarfik / Økonomiafdeling Helene D Jensen Fuldmægtig finans & løn 38 79 06 [email protected] Ivalu Leander Overassistent finans & løn 38 79 25 [email protected] Elisabeth Nielsen Fuldmægtig løn & finans 38 79 24 [email protected] Amalie Kristiansen Fuldmægtig løn & finans 38 79 19 [email protected] Inuussutissarsiornermut allaffik / Erhvervskontor Nikolaj Jensen Koordinerende Erhvervskonsulent, mobil: 59 38 78 85 [email protected] 07 18 Niels Hansen Jagtbetjent – mobil: 52 21 60 96 10 60 Isumaginninnermut Ilaqutareeqarnermullu Ingerlatsivik / Forvaltning for Social og Familieanliggender Lydie K. Løvstrøm Afdelingsleder 38 79 14 [email protected] Johanne G. Zeeb Børn og unge 38 79 15 [email protected] Justine S. Kristiansen offentlighjælp 38 79 16 [email protected] Kirsten Olsvig Førtidspension 38 79 24 [email protected] Najannguaq Mathæussen Sagsb. Handicap 38 79 13 [email protected] Najaaraq Kristiansen Pension, cpr.nr. 1-15 38 79 17 [email protected] Marius Didriksen Fuldmægtig 38 79 21 [email protected] Lea-Birthe M.
    [Show full text]
  • Bowhead Whale (Balaena Mysticetus) and Killer Whale (Orcinus Orca) Co-Occurrence in the U.S
    1 Bowhead whale (Balaena mysticetus) and killer whale (Orcinus orca) co-occurrence in the U.S. Pacific Arctic, 2 2009–2018: evidence from bowhead whale carcasses 3 4 Amy L. Willoughby1,2, Megan C. Ferguson2,3, Raphaela Stimmelmayr4,5, Janet T. Clarke1,2, Amelia A. Brower1,2 5 6 Contact e-mail: [email protected] 7 8 1 University of Washington, Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean, Seattle, WA, USA 9 2 Marine Mammal Laboratory, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, NOAA, Seattle, WA, USA 10 3 School of Fishery and Aquatic Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA 11 4 Department of Wildlife Management, North Slope Borough, Utqiaġvik, AK, USA 12 5 Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USA 13 14 15 ABSTRACT 16 Imagery and sighting data on bowhead whale (Balaena mysticetus) carcasses documented from 2009 to 2018 during 17 aerial surveys in the eastern Chukchi and western Beaufort seas have provided evidence for killer whale (Orcinus 18 orca) predation on bowhead whales of the Bering-Chukchi-Beaufort Seas stock. The Aerial Surveys of Arctic 19 Marine Mammals (ASAMM) project provides information on distribution, behavior, and relative density of marine 20 mammals. ASAMM surveys large areas of bowhead whale and killer whale summer and autumn habitat and offers 21 consistent information on bowhead whale carcasses. Thirty-three bowhead whale carcasses were documented in 22 July–October, from 2009 to 2018. Carcasses were distributed across the eastern Chukchi and western Beaufort seas 23 from 141.6° W to 168.1° W and 68.9° N to 72.0° N.
    [Show full text]