<<

STRONG NEIGHBORHOOD HIGH SCHOOLS FOR A STRONGER

THE GENERATION ALL ACTION PLAN APRIL 2016

Generation All envisions a city in which: all is a shared responsibility to reach their potential so that our city can thrive. top-quality public high schools that have the active support of the wider community. students graduate and are prepared contributing to the vitality of their Learn more about Generation All at generationallchicago.org or on Facebook and Twitter.

The Generation All Team Associate Executive Director TABLE OF CONTENTS

...... 2

...... 3

...... 4

Our City ...... 7

They Serve All Students...... 8 Neighborhood Public High Schools: Fast Facts ...... 10

...... 14

An Action Plan That Puts Neighborhood Public High Schools Front and Center ...... 18

Solution 1: Practice ...... 20

Solution 2: Policy ...... 32

Solution 3: Public Engagement ...... 36

An Invitation ...... 42

...... 43

...... 43

Appendix B: The Generation All Planning Process ...... 44

Appendix C: Chicago Public Neighborhood High Schools 2015-16 ...... 46

...... 47 MESSAGE FROM THE STEERING COMMITTEE

Fellow Chicagoans, Generation All is a citywide initiative with a bold yet simple vision: to unite us all in revitalizing our neighborhood public high schools.

GUIDING PRINCIPLES

Community vitality and school success go hand Equitable, adequate and sustained investment in hand. is essential to the success of our neighborhood 1 2 public high schools.

Young people prosper when they feel they are part of a safe and supportive community. that welcome everyone. 3 4

Learning takes place anytime, anywhere. grounded in research and practice. 5 6

GUIDING PRINCIPLES 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1 only 28 percent.2 Generation All’s Action Plan for Putting Neighborhood Public High Schools Front and Center 4 While across the city.

4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

– Pasi Sahlberg, PhD, Visiting Professor of Practice in Education, Harvard University

SOLUTION 1: PRACTICE

1a. Strengthen teaching and learning.

1b. Invest in teachers and principals.

1c. Make neighborhood high schools centers of their community.

1d.

1e. Make schools safe and supportive for students and adults.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 SOLUTION 2: POLICY

2a. Put a hold on the closing and opening of public high schools

2b. Make school evaluation less punitive and more focused on problem-solving and growth.

2c. Adopt a more equitable funding formula for Chicago’s public schools.

SOLUTION 3: PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT

3a. families.

3b.

3c. Design innovative and practical ways for community groups, businesses and residents to support neighborhood high schools.

Visit the Generation All website to find out how you can get involved.

6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WHAT IS AT STAKE? OUR CITY

Our city’s future prosperity depends on the quality of the education our young people receive today.

5 is only 28 percent.6 8 of CPS high school students aspire to earn at least a 4-year college degree, 75% but only 17% are predicted to do so WHAT IS EDUCATION EQUITY? — 9 Equity in education means that every student has a fair chance to get a high-quality public education. It is based on fair and just access to high-quality learning opportunities and resources for all students, enabling them to complete high school prepared for college or careers and lifelong learning. students, regardless of circumstances. It means leveling the playing poverty, race, language or learning challenges—do not prevent them from reaching their potential. Education equity is achieved when all students and schools have access to what they need to succeed. This will vary by school and by student or groups of students.

WHAT IS AT STAKE? 7 WHY NEIGHBORHOOD PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOLS? THEY SERVE ALL STUDENTS.

high schools as schools that guarantee enrollment for students living within the school’s attendance special application, win a lottery or qualify to attend the school. Neighborhood Public High Schools Serve the

Largest Share of CPS High School Students Total High School Enrollment: 111,167

8 WHY NEIGHBORHOOD PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOLS?

Types of Chicago Public High Schools

60 50 50 47 47

40

30 27

20

Number of schools 10 10 5 4 2 0

Neighborhood Charter* Option Citywide* Selective Enrollment* Magnet* Special Education Contract*

TYPES OF CHICAGO PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOLS

Neighborhood:

Charter:

Option:

Citywide:

Selective Enrollment:

Magnet:

Special Education:

Contract:

WHY NEIGHBORHOOD PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOLS? 9 NEIGHBORHOOD PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOLS FAST FACTS

250 80% 70% 200 192 60% 150 138 50% 40% 100 30% 20% 50 As New High Schools Opened, the Share of High 10%

School Students Attending Neighborhood High 0 0 2005 2015 Schools Decreased

20.0% 18.2% 18.0% 15.8% 16.0% 13.6% 13.7% 14.0% 13.3% 12.0% 9.4% 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 6.3% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% Neighborhood Charter Citywide Contract Magnet Option Selective

Top 8 high schools with the highest concentrations of students with disabilities Highlighted schools are neighborhood high schools

School Total Students Students with IEPs Share of students with IEPs

10 6 60.00% 311 122 39.23% 150 55 36.67% 204 63 30.88% 199 61 30.65% 479 141 29.44% 289 84 29.07% 234 68 29.06%

10 WHY NEIGHBORHOOD PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOLS? NEIGHBORHOOD PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOLS FAST FACTS

STUDENTS WHO LIVE IN THE ATTENDANCE BOUNDARY AND ATTEND THE NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOL Neighborhood Buy-In Rate TOTAL NUMBER OF STUDENTS WHO LIVE IN THE ATTENDANCE BOUNDARY

Schools with 80% the Highest Neighborhood 70% Buy-In Rates in 2015

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

80% 70% 60% 50% 40%

Schools Deviating 30% from the District Average Neighborhood 20% Buy-In Rate 10%

0%

WHY NEIGHBORHOOD PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOLS? 11 A school system built on expanding choice increases burdens on the least-privileged families and students and does not always guarantee a better education. Almost 50 percent of Chicago public high school students attend neighborhood high schools. In Chicago—a city of neighborhoods—neighborhood high schools play an essential role as “anchor institutions.” 11 10

12 WHY NEIGHBORHOOD PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOLS?

Support is growing for neighborhood public high schools. selective school. include all of our students. Providing strong neighborhood schools is a matter of fairness. should not be determined by ZIP code. 12

WHY NEIGHBORHOOD PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOLS? 13 WHAT IS THE PROBLEM? OUTDATED THINKING AND POLICIES THAT BACKFIRE

– Pedro Noguera, Distinguished Professor of Education, UCLA, and Director, Center for the Study of School Transformation

Expanding school options has inadvertently created a tiered system of public high schools that sorts 15 Expanding school options has created the impression among families that the neighborhood public high school is a last resort. 14

14 WHAT IS THE PROBLEM? Expanding school options has created a culture of The theory that competition will force neighborhood uncertainty and competition public high schools to improve is yet to be proven. 16 The rapid and largely unplanned opening of new high schools since 2005 also has undermined existing high schools.

Inequity of Education Outcomes, as Measured by ACT Scores, Has Increased Over Time in CPS Each dot represents a school’s average ACT score for that year

30

25

20

15

1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015

WHAT IS THE PROBLEM? 15 Competition leaves many neighborhood public high schools with a high concentration of students with poverty-related and academic challenges. 19 Chicago needs to ensure that its system of choice does not widen disparities or exacerbate segregation. WHAT IF CHICAGO HAD AN EQUITABLE EDUCATION SYSTEM IN WHICH ALL FAMILIES HAD THE CERTAINTY OF A HIGH-QUALITY PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL IN THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD THAT GUARANTEED ENROLLMENT TO THEIR CHILDREN?

— An equitable education system in Chicago would make high-quality learning experiences, both in and out of the 18 classroom, available to all students.

Throughout the world, greater choice in school systems An equitable education system would ensure that schools would tends to result in increased segregation and social and have the tools, resources and supports to enable their students to succeed. And ultimately, An equitable education system would lay the foundation for a more prosperous and vibrant city.

16 WHAT IS THE PROBLEM? FOR CHICAGO TO THRIVE, OUR NEIGHBORHOODS MUST BE ANCHORED BY TOP-QUALITY PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOLS. The Generation All Action Plan focuses on three ways to get there: Policy,The Generation Practice, All and Action Public Plan Engagement focuses on .three ways to get there: Policy, Practice, and Public Engagement.

PUBLIC POLICY PRACTICE PUBLICENGAGEMENT POLICY PRACTICE ENGAGEMENT Adopt policies that Make neighborhood Generate public and strengthenAdopt policies that highMake schools neighborhood safe, politicalGenerate support public andfor neighborhoodstrengthen public supportive,high schools exciting safe, neighborhoodpolitical support high for highneighborhood schools and public placessupportive, of learning exciting schools.neighborhood high expandhigh schools learning and thatplaces prepare of learning students schools. opportunitiesexpand learning for forthat the prepare future. students students.opportunities for for the future. students. WHAT CAN WE DO ABOUT IT? AN ACTION PLAN THAT PUTS NEIGHBORHOOD PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOLS FRONT AND CENTER

SOLUTION 1: PRACTICE

SOLUTION 2: POLICY schools

SOLUTION 3: PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT

18 WHAT CAN WE DO ABOUT IT?

SOLUTION 1: PRACTICE Make neighborhood public high schools safe, supportive and exciting places of learning that prepare students for the future.

20

Arts Alliance 2009

20 SOLUTION 1: PRACTICE 1a. Strengthen teaching and learning by making instruction challenging, student-centered and connected to young people’s lives and communities.

– XQ: The Super School Project website

SOLUTION 1: PRACTICE 21 Deeper Learning: The Planning Guide

22 SOLUTION 1: PRACTICE CONNECTED LEARNING IN ACTION

Condensed from an article by Dennis Pierce for the Convergence Academies at

SOLUTION 1: PRACTICE 23 WHAT COULD THIS LOOK LIKE?

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

24 SOLUTION 1: PRACTICE LAUNCHING FIELD TRIPS TO SUCCESS

SOLUTION 1: PRACTICE 25 1b. Invest in teachers and principals, prioritizing time for them to learn, plan and collaborate.

21

WHAT COULD THIS LOOK LIKE?

>

>

>

>

>

>

26 SOLUTION 1: PRACTICE 1c. Make neighborhood public high schools centers of their community.

22

WHAT COULD THIS LOOK LIKE?

>

>

>

>

>

SOLUTION 1: PRACTICE 27

COMMUNITY SCHOOLS HELP STUDENTS SUCCEED

SOLUTION 1: PRACTICE 29 1d. students at all neighborhood public high schools.

WHAT COULD THIS LOOK LIKE?

>

>

>

>

30 SOLUTION 1: PRACTICE 1e. Strengthen restorative practices to make schools safe and supportive for students and adults.

WHAT COULD THIS LOOK LIKE?

>

>

>

>

>

SOLUTION 1: PRACTICE 31 SOLUTION 2: POLICY Adopt policies that strengthen neighborhood public high schools and expand learning opportunities for their students.

24 ILLINOIS HAS A LONG WAY TO GO

— Its school funding formula ranks 49th in equity and 50th in adequacy.25 A study released in 2015 by the Education Trust says that Illinois school districts with the greatest number of students in poverty receive substantially fewer state and 26 percent less. The study also says that school districts with the largest enrollments of minority students receive 15 percent less per student than those districts serving the fewest.27 Illinois relies too heavily on local property taxes to fund public education, causing a dramatic and unfair imbalance in income communities to fund schools adequately. Illinois also lacks adequate resources to meet the needs of its students and schools. To change this, Illinois needs to explore generating revenue by increasing the state income tax, which is among the lowest in the Midwest.

To transform schools and improve student outcomes, we must change state funding for education. After all, to invest in with greater growth in educational attainment also enjoy greater growth in productivity and worker compensation.

32 SOLUTION 2: POLICY 2a. Put a hold on the opening and closing of public high schools until there is an open, inclusive, citywide planning process that considers neighborhood needs.

CHICAGO NEIGHBORHOODS NOW: A FRAMEWORK FOR LOCAL PROSPERITY — Chicago Neighborhoods Now is a structure created by the Chicago Department of Planning and Development to guide investment in neighborhoods across the city. Rather than focusing on 77 16 planning areas using commercial and physical boundaries— expressways, rivers and rail lines—to examine common needs and interests among neighborhoods. These natural boundaries create a framework for citywide planning that also accounts for a local context, contributing to greater understanding of how “the built environment contributes to local prosperity and where additional planning and investment are needed.”

framework to convene community planning meetings in each of the 16 areas. These meetings include city planners, elected attending the meetings share progress on existing plans and generate new ideas to be added to the new plan. Ideas for investing in each planning area will be documented in a Chicago Neighborhoods Now action plan, which will be published sometime in 2016. This planning process is an opportunity for neighborhood public high schools to be included strategically in community planning and capital investment to repair or update school buildings and grounds. Chicago Neighborhoods Now began as Chicago Neighborhoods 2015: Assets, Plans and Trends, a research project convened by The Chicago Community Trust with the city planning department, LISC Chicago, the Metropolitan Planning Council and DePaul

SOLUTION 2: POLICY 33 WHAT COULD THIS LOOK LIKE?

>

>

>

2b. Make school evaluation less punitive and more focused on problem-solving and growth.

29 28

34 SOLUTION 2: POLICY WHAT COULD THIS LOOK LIKE?

>

>

>

>

2c. Adopt a more equitable funding formula for public in student and neighborhood needs and resources.

SOLUTION 2: POLICY 35

Equality = SAMENESS Equity = FAIRNESS EQUALITY is about SAMENESS. EQUITY is about FAIRNESS. It’s It about making sure people get access to the same opportunities. can only work IF everyone starts from the SAME place. In history can create barriers to participation, so we must FIRST ensure EQUITY before we can enjoy equality.

WHAT COULD THIS LOOK LIKE?

>

>

>

>

36 SOLUTION 2: POLICY SOLUTION 3: PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT

Generate public and political support for neighborhood high schools.

next year.

SOLUTION 3: PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT 37 GROWING A SUCCESSFUL SYSTEM OF NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOLS

38 SOLUTION 3: PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT 3a. Create opportunities to learn about neighborhood

WHAT COULD THIS LOOK LIKE?

>

>

>

>

>

SOLUTION 3: PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT 39 3b.

WHAT COULD THIS LOOK LIKE?

>

>

>

>

>

40 SOLUTION 3: PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT 3c. Design innovative and practical ways for community groups, businesses and residents to partner with and support neighborhood public high schools.

WHAT COULD THIS LOOK LIKE?

>

>

>

>

>

SOLUTION 3: PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT 41 AN INVITATION

A renewed commitment to Chicago’s neighborhood public high schools is critical if we are to prepare all of our young people to lead healthy, productive lives and contribute to their families, their communities and our city.

42 AN INVITATION APPENDICES Appendix A: Examples of Disparities in Two Very

Neighborhood Public High Schools Serve Students of All Backgrounds and Abilities

A Chicago Neighborhood High School A Chicago Selective Enrollment High School

95 percent 34 percent 26 percent 4 percent 24 percent 1 percent .3 percent 43 percent 4 advanced placement 20 advanced placement 4 foreign-language 23 foreign-language 3 years 4 years 4 college-level 10 clubs 27 clubs 63 percent 93 percent 3 percent 98 percent

APPENDICES 43 Appendix B: The Generation All Planning Process

Creating a community and city-owned plan based on proven practices, public input and innovative strategies

Public Engagement

“What can our city and communities do to revitalize neighborhood public high schools so that ALL of our students experience a top quality education?”

44 APPENDICES

everybody has a role to play in rebuilding engagement and commitment to neighborhood public high schools.

Racial Demographics of Focus Group Participants Ages of Focus Group Participants

80 50 45

40 36 60 63 67 35 29 30 24 40 36 20 13 20 5 11 10 0 0 Asian Alone Black or Afri- Hispanic or Two or more White alone, 15-18 19-29 30-39 40-49 50+ N/A can American Latino races not Hispanic or alone Latino

Thank you to the following organizations for hosting focus groups:

Generation All used website and social media platforms

APPENDICES 45 Appendix C: Chicago Public Neighborhood

Benito Juarez Community Greater Lawndale High School For Nicholas Academy High School Social Justice 5900 N Glenwood Ave Chicago, IL 60660 North-Grand High School Bowen High School Gurdon S Hubbard High School 6200 S Hamlin Ave Chicago, IL 60629 Hope College Preparatory High School 730 N Pulaski Rd Chicago, IL 60624 3601 N Milwaukee Ave Chicago, IL 60641 5515 S Lowe Ave Chicago, IL 60621 Paul Robeson High School Charles P Steinmetz Hyde Park Academy High School College Preparatory High School 6220 S Stony Island Ave Chicago, IL 60637 3030 N Mobile Ave Chicago, IL 60634 Percy L Julian High School 10330 S Elizabeth St Chicago, IL 60643 Chicago Vocational Career Technology High School Academy High School Roald 5110 N Damen Ave Chicago, IL 60625 John F Kennedy High School Christian Fenger Academy High School Roberto Clemente Community Academy High School John Hancock College 1147 N Western Ave Chicago, IL 60622 David G Preparatory High School High School 4034 W 56th St Chicago, IL 60629 Roger C Sullivan High School 2345 S Christiana Ave Chicago, IL 60623 6631 N Bosworth Ave Chicago, IL 60626 John M Harlan Community Academy Edward Tilden Career Community High School Stephen T Academy High School 4747 S Union Ave Chicago, IL 60609 John Marshall Metropolitan High School Theodore Roosevelt High School Edwin G Foreman High School 3250 W Adams St Chicago, IL 60624 3436 W Wilson Ave Chicago, IL 60625 3235 N LeClaire Ave Chicago, IL 60641 Thomas Kelly High School Ellen H 4343 W Wrightwood Ave Chicago, IL 60639 4136 S California Ave Chicago, IL 60632 High School Wells Community Academy High School High School 5015 S Blackstone Ave Chicago, IL 60615 936 N Ashland Ave Chicago, IL 60622 Emil G Hirsch Metropolitan High School Academy High School 7740 S Ingleside Ave Chicago, IL 60619 Lake View High School 4015 N Ashland Ave Chicago, IL 60613 244 E Pershing Rd Chicago, IL 60653 Eric Solorio Academy High School William Howard Taft High School 5400 S St Louis Ave Chicago, IL 60632 High School 2001 N Orchard St Chicago, IL 60614 6530 W Bryn Mawr Ave Chicago, IL 60631 Frederick A Douglass Academy William J Bogan High School High School Manley Career Academy High School 3939 W 79th St Chicago, IL 60652 543 N Waller Ave Chicago, IL 60644 2935 W Polk St Chicago, IL 60612 High School Marie Sklodowska Curie 6520 S Wood St Chicago, IL 60636 5630 S Rockwell St Chicago, IL 60629 Metropolitan High School 4959 S Archer Ave Chicago, IL 60632 World Language Academy High School George H 1744 W Pryor Ave Chicago, IL 60643 George Washington High School Multicultural Academy of Scholarship 3535 E 114th St Chicago, IL 60617

46 APPENDICES NOTES

1

2

The Educational Attainment of Students,

4The Educational Attainment of Chicago Public Schools Students, 2.

5

6

The Educational Attainment of Chicago Public Schools Students, 1.

8 The Educational Attainment of Chicago Public Schools Students, 2.

9Lost: The Crisis Of Jobless and Out Of School Teens and Young Adults In Chicago,

10

11

12Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race

14

15Equity and Quality in Education: Supporting Disadvantaged Students and Schools,

16School Choice and Equity: Current Policies in OECD Countries and a Literature Review,

NOTES 47

18High-School Choice in New York City: A Report on the School Choices and Placements of Low-Achieving Students,

19Equity and Quality in Education, 9.

20For Each and Every Child: A Strategy for Education Equity and Excellence

21

22Community Schools Results,

24 Outcomes: Evidence from School Finance Reforms,

25

26Funding Gaps 2015: Too Many States Still Spend Less on Educating Students Who Need The Most,

28The Educational Attainment of Chicago Public Schools Students, 22.

29

48 NOTES GENERATION ALL LEADERS

STEERING COMMITTEE Jennifer Johnson Andrea Saenz Patricia Gándara MEMBERS Quest Center Facilitator, First Deputy Commissioner, Research Professor and Co- Director, Nancy Aardema The Civil Rights Project at UCLA Executive Director, Logan Square Gregory Jones Nouha Shwehdi Graduate School of Education Neighborhood Association High School Terry Mazany Sandra Abrevaya Eric Skalinder, NBCT President and CEO, Wendy Katten The Chicago Community Trust Thrive Chicago Executive Director, Raise Your Hand High School Pedro Noguera Jennifer Arwade Imran Khan Audrena Spence Distinguished Professor of Co-Executive Director, CEO and Co-Founder, Embarc Executive Director, Metropolitan Education, University of California, Communities United Family Services Calumet Center Michael Lach Los Angeles Director of STEM Policy and Paul Sznewajs Jeannie Oakes Executive Director, Strategic Initiatives, University of Executive Director, Ingenuity, Inc. Presidential Professor Emerita in Southwest Organizing Project Chicago Urban Education Institute Jesus Velazquez Educational Equity, University of Karen Boran Rebecca Levin Community Organizer, Logan California, Los Angeles Principal, John Hancock College Square Neighborhood Association Charles Payne Prep High School Alan Mather Bonita Walker-Jones, NBCT Frank P. Hixon Distinguished Patrick Brosnan Career Success, Chicago Public Schools Career and Tech Ed Teacher, Service Professor, University of Executive Director, Brighton Park VOISE Academy Chicago School of Social Service Neighborhood Council Ernesto Matias Administration Chief of Network 4, Chicago Chris Brown Public Schools Warren Simmons Director, Education and FORMER STEERING Former Executive Director; Engagement, LISC Chicago Xiao Lin Mei COMMITTEE MEMBERS Assistant Clinical Professor, Student, Jones College Prep Aarti Dhupelia Vaughn Bryant High School Education Policy, Brown University, Annenberg Institute for School Mary Ellen Messner Career Success, Chicago Public Schools Reform Deputy Commissioner of Youth Christian Diaz Lynn Cherkasky-Davis Services, City of Chicago Department Rebecca Wolfe Former Youth Education Organizer, Director of Professional Learning- of Family and Support Services Senior Director, Students at the Logan Square Neighborhood CTU Quest Center, Chicago Center, Jobs for the Future Teachers Union Melissa Mitchell Association Executive Director, Federation for Ted Christians Community Schools Peggy Mueller GENERATION ALL TEAM Student Development Corporation Michelle Morales The Chicago Community Trust Executive Director, Mikva Challenge Abbey D. McLaren Jessica Diaz Donald Rapier Student, Katya Nuques Class of 2015 graduate of Executive Director, Enlace Lindblom Math and Science Misuzu Schexnider Sam Dyson (Little Village) Academy Director, Mozilla Hive Chicago Cristina Pacione-Zayas Michael Rodriguez Learning Network Co-Chair, the Puerto Rican Agenda Former Executive Director, Executive Director Mindy Faber Enlace (Little Village) Danielle Parker Director, Convergence Academies, Center for Community Arts Director, Center for Student Development, Chicago Urban Partnerships at Columbia ADVISORY COUNCIL College Chicago League Mary Ann Pitcher Janice Jackson Amy Heineke Associate Professor of Bilingual Co-Director, Network for College Success Public Schools and Bicultural Education, Loyola University Rita Raichoudhuri Fred Frelow Principal, Wells Community Joe Irizarry, NBCT Foundation Math Department Chair, John F. Academy High School Karen G.J. Lewis, NBCT President, Chicago Teachers Union

NOTES 49 t #GenAllPlan tt Get Involved at GenerationAllChicago.org