A Political Compromise

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

A Political Compromise A study of the origins, structure and performance of the Australian Defence Force Academy Klaus D.H. Fe_l_sche Master of Defence Studies University College, University of New South Wales Australian Defence Force Academy Northcott Drive CAMPBELL ACT 2601 September 1991 -1- Contents Acknowledgements •••••••••• 11 Disclaimer •••••••••• 11 Abstract •••••••••• 111 Abbreviations .•••.••.•• IV Chapter 1: Degrees for Officers .......... 1 Chapter 2: The Tri-Service Academy .......... 15 Chapter 3: The Armed Forces University .......... 31 Chapter 4: The Compromise- A University College .......... 51 Chapter 5: The Effects of Compromise .......... 57 Epilogue .......... 70 Bibliography .......... 74 Annex A: Student Wastage Rates .......... A Annex B: Casey University- Australian Defence Force Academy Bill .......... B Annex C: Agreement Between the Commonwealth of Australia and the University of New South Wales ........... C -ll- Acknowledgements In writing this sub-thesis I am indebted to the assistance and advice offered by many at the Australian Defence Force Academy. In particular my thanks must go to Professor Peter Dennis who kindly agreed to supervise this work and offered much sound advice, to which, I must confess, I have probably not done justice. Special mention must also go to Dr Hugh Smith for his initial advice and encouragement and the many pieces of research I was able to build upon. Additionally, I must thank Veronica Selinger for checking my final draft and Geoff Colson who patiently read two early drafts. Geoff's helpful comments contributed greatly to the final structure of this sub-thesis. Disclaimer The views expressed in this sub-thesis are my own and should not be interpreted as representing the official views of the Australian Defence Force Academy, the Australi­ an Defence Force, or the Department of Defence. Certificate I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and that to the best of my knowledge and belief, it contains no material published or written by another person nor material which to a substantial extent has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma of a university or other institution of higher learning, except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the sub-thesis. Klaus D.H. Felsche -lll- Abstract This sub-thesis traces the stages which led to the establishment of the Australian Defence Force Academy. The origins of the Academy are to be found in the 1950s. The perceived need for highly qualified technical officers to handle the technological demands of the future was complemented by a perception that officers with degree­ level education would be better equipped to make decisions and provide strategic advice to government than their less educated counterparts. The emergence of the tri­ Service Academy concept is discussed in some detail to highlight the constantly increas­ ing involvement in the proposal by people and organisations from outside the defence community. The struggle between the three Services, eager to retain control over their officers' education, and the Department of Defence with its ambition to rationalise common defence functions, is described. The heated debate over the proposal to estab­ lish an armed forces university resulted in the rejection of the proposal by the Parlia­ mentary Standing Committee on Public Works. The response from the Government and the Department of Defence was a modified proposal, acceptable to most of Casey University's critics, but flawed in its basic structure. Some aspects of the Academy's performance are described and compared to the per­ formance and experiences of the Australian single-Service colleges which preceded it and some comparable overseas institutions. The paper concludes by revisiting some of the proposals presented as alternative models for the Academy during the Public Works Committee hearings in 1978/9. These may well provide a sound basis for the future development of the Australian Defence Force Academy. -IV- Abbreviations ADF ........................................... Australian Defence Force ADFA ........................................... Australian Defence Force Academy ANU ........................................... Australian National University ARA ........................................... Australian Regular Army ARes ........................................... Army Reserve (formerly the CMF) A VCC ........................................... Australian Vice Chancellors' Committee CAS ........................................... Chief of the Air Staff CCAE ........................................... Canberra College of Advanced Education (now UNIC) CDF ........................................... Chief of the Defence Force CDFS ........................................... Chief of the Defence Force Staff (now CDF) CGS ........................................... Chief of the General Staff CMF ........................................... Citizens' Military Forces CNS ........................................... Chief of the Naval Staff COS ........................................... Chief of Staff FAUSA ........................................... Federated Australian University Staff Associations PWC ........................................... Parliamentary Standing Committee on Public Works RAAF ........................................... Royal Australian Airforce RAN ........................................... Royal Australian Navy RANC ........................................... Royal Australian Naval College RANEM ........................................... Royal Australian Navy Emergency Reserve RMC ........................................... Royal Military College, Duntroon RMIT ........................................... Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology UNIC ........................................... University of Canberra (formerly CCAE) UNSW ........................................... University of New South Wales -1- Chapter 1 Degrees for Officers There is "an insufficient number of officers, middle to senior levels, in all three Services with the intellectual basis upon which to analyse issues and contribute to policy." -Sir Arthur Tange, Secretary, Department of Defence 1 Introduction The Australian Defence Force Academy (ADFA) is a uniquely Australian institution, formed by the Australian political an<?_ military environment and contrasting sharply in structure with its non-Australian counterparts. No other nation has attempt­ ed to establish a military academy without a mechanism for governing the whole institu­ tion internally, and without a formal mechanism to resolve conflicts between the differ­ ent components of that institution at the highest levels within the institution. Few military colleges have been allowed the degree of academic independ­ ence granted to the University College of the University of New South Wales. Few outsiders would understand how a military academy, fully funded by the Department of Defence, could exist with only minimal input from Defence into the structure and content of the academic courses offered. Most foreign military academies have such mechanisms built into their very constitutions; the Australian military's input is restrict­ ed to advice offered on subordinate advisory bodies and through informal channels. 2 1. Cited by H. W. Smith, "Educating the Guardians: The Politics of the Australian Defence Force Academy'', Politics, vol19 no 1 (May 1984) p 33. 2. Air Vice Marshal RJ. Bomball, Overseas VISil Repon: Commandam, Defence Academy 21 April-15 May 1991, unpublished, pp 2-4. -2- The constitution of the Academy is not laid down in legislation. The Acade­ my is established and governed primarily by a contract between the Commonwealth of Australia and the University of New South Wales. 1 A Chief of Defence Force Staff 2 Administrative Instruction established ADFA as a Joint Service Unit under Section 32C of the Defence Act. 3 Several other subordinate instructions and agreements 4 exist but the Academy's existence as a military academy is primarily based on the agreement with the UNSW. The essential aims ·of the Academy, as specified in the Agreement, are: (a) to provide military education and training of officer cadets for the purpose of developing the professional abilities and the qualities of character and leadership that are appropriate to officers of the De­ fence Force; and (b) to provide for officer undergraduates and, by way of founda- tion for their careers as officers of the Defence Force, officer cadets a balanced and liberal university education in a military environment. 5 The aim of this paper is to describe and to examine the processes which brought about this unique institution. This development will trace the origins from the Services' desire to obtain degree-level education for some of its officers from the late 1940s; the subsequent early attempts at centralising key defence functions in the mid 1. The contract is the Agreement Berween the Commonwealth ofAustralia and the Universiry ofNew South Wales to Establish a University College Wuhin the Australian Defence Force Academy (Canberra, 7 May 1981 ). A copy is attached at Annex c. 2. The Chief o[ the Defence Force Staff(CDFS) held that title at the time the agreement was signed. He is now called the Chief of the Defence Force (CD F). A number of major changes to the ADF structure have provided the CDFwith command functions not held by the CDFS. 3. Air Chief Marshal N.P. McNamara, CDFS Administrative Instruction 1/1984 (Canberra: CDFS
Recommended publications
  • 2 Australia, Japan and the Region

    2 Australia, Japan and the Region

    AUSTRALIA, JAPAN AND THE REGION 31 2 AUSTRALIA, JAPAN AND THE REGION THE WEST NEW GUINEA DISPUTE, 1952–1962 David Walton Indonesian and Dutch claims over West New Guinea in the period 1949 to 1962 presented one of the first opportunities for regional dialogue in post-war Australia-Japan relations. The aims of this chapter are to chart changes in the Australian attitude towards Japan’s role in regional affairs and to examine how dialogue on West New Guinea assisted in laying the foundations for further regional cooperation and consultation between the two countries. The chapter examines the beginnings of post-war consultation between Australia and Japan. It is argued that the diplomatic intrigues involving the West New Guinea dispute (1952 to 1962) led to a substantial effort by Australian officials to bring Japan into closer alignment with Australian foreign policy objectives. As part of this initiative, regular meetings between Australia and Japan resulted in the relatively rapid development in the quality and scope of discussions and exchange of information on regional issues. Accordingly this chapter provides evidence of the formative processes towards institutionalising regular bilateral consultation and exchange of sensitive political information on regional issues. Regular diplomatic consultation on regional issues was important as it provided a basis for broadening the structure of the bilateral 32 JAPAN’S FUTURE IN EAST ASIA AND THE PACIFIC relationship and improved both countries’ understanding of contemporary bilateral relations. Overview of the West New Guinea dispute The political landscape of early post-war Asia was dominated by the notions of nationalism and demands for independence from European colonial powers.
  • Geschichte Neuerwerbungsliste 3. Quartal 2009

    Geschichte Neuerwerbungsliste 3. Quartal 2009

    Geschichte Neuerwerbungsliste 3. Quartal 2009 Geschichte: Einführungen........................................................................................................................................2 Geschichtsschreibung und Geschichtstheorie ..........................................................................................................2 Teilbereiche der Geschichte (Politische Geschichte, Kultur-, Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte allgemein) ........4 Historische Hilfswissenschaften ..............................................................................................................................6 Ur- und Frühgeschichte; Mittelalter- und Neuzeitarchäologie.................................................................................7 Allgemeine Weltgeschichte, Geschichte der Entdeckungen, Geschichte der Weltkriege......................................10 Alte Geschichte......................................................................................................................................................15 Europäische Geschichte in Mittelalter und Neuzeit ...............................................................................................16 Deutsche Geschichte..............................................................................................................................................18 Geschichte der deutschen Laender und Staedte .....................................................................................................24 Geschichte der Schweiz, Österreichs,
  • ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE in the AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE: TOWARDS a UNIQUE SOLUTION Brigadier Peter J. Dunn, AM Master of Defence S

    ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE in the AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE: TOWARDS a UNIQUE SOLUTION Brigadier Peter J. Dunn, AM Master of Defence S

    ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE IN THE AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE: TOWARDS A UNIQUE SOLUTION Brigadier Peter J. Dunn, AM Master of Defence Studies Sub-Thesis University College The University of New South Wales Australian Defence Force Academy 1994 CONTENTS PARTS 1 PRINCIPAL CHANGES IN AUSTRALIA'S MILITARY COMMAND STRUCTURE SINCE THE 1950s 1 2 ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE THEORY AND REVIEWS OF THE ADF 16 3 A CHANGING ORGANISATIONAL ENVIRONMENT FOR THE ADF- THE NEED TO FOCUS ON "CORE BUSINESS" 27 4 ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE FOR MORE EFFECTIVE ADF OPERATIONS 45 5 CONCLUSIONS 68 BIBLIOGR.\PHY 74 FIGURES 1 LOCBI IN THE PRE-BAKER STUDY ADF 32 2 LOCBI IN THE POST- BAKER STUDY ADF 33 3 OPERATIONAL FLEXIBILITY IN THE ADF STRUCTURE 42 4 MODEL ONE ADF ORGANISATION 53 5 MODEL TWO ADF ORGANISATION 57 6 MODEL THREE ADF ORGANISATION 66 Ill ABSTR.4CT The Australian Defence organisation has been the subject of almost constant review since the 1950s. The first of these major reviews, the Morshead Review was initiated in 1957. This review coincided with the growing realisation that Australia had to become more self reliant in defence matters. The experience of World War Two had shown that total reliance on "great and powerful friends" was a dangerous practice and self reliance dictated that Australia's military forces would have to act together in a joint environment. Australia's system of military command had to be capable of producing effective policies and planning guidance to met the new demands of independent joint operations. Successive reviews aimed at moving the Australian Defence Forces toward a more joint organisation have resulted in major changes to the higher defence machinery.
  • Evaluating Australian Army Program Performance 106

    Evaluating Australian Army Program Performance 106

    Purdue University Purdue e-Pubs Libraries Faculty and Staff Scholarship and Purdue Libraries and School of Information Research Studies 4-14-2020 Australian National Audit Office:v E aluating Australian Army Program Performance Bert Chapman Purdue University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/lib_fsdocs Part of the Accounting Commons, Accounting Law Commons, Defense and Security Studies Commons, Government Contracts Commons, Information Literacy Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Military and Veterans Studies Commons, Military, War, and Peace Commons, National Security Law Commons, Other International and Area Studies Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, Policy History, Theory, and Methods Commons, Political Economy Commons, Political Science Commons, Public Administration Commons, Public Economics Commons, and the Public Policy Commons Recommended Citation Bert Chapman. "Australian National Audit Office:v E aluating Australian Army Program Performance." Security Challenges, 16 (2)(2020): 106-118. Note: the file below contains the entire journal issue. This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. Security Challenges Vol. 16 No. 2 2020 Special Issue Plan B for Australian Defence Graeme Dobell John Blaxland Cam Hawker Rita Parker Stephen Bartos Rebecca Strating Mark Armstrong Martin White Bert Chapman Security Challenges Vol. 16 / No. 2 / 2020 Security
  • Australia's Participation in the Pine Gap Enterprise

    Australia's Participation in the Pine Gap Enterprise

    The Nautilus Institute for Security and Sustainability Australia’s participation in the Pine Gap enterprise Desmond Ball, Bill Robinson and Richard Tanter Nautilus Institute for Security and Sustainability Special Report June 9, 2016 I. Summary Australian participation in the operation of Pine Gap is effectively complete, with access to all areas of the base except the US National Cryptographic Room. The senior Australian Defence officials who negotiated the original implementing agreement with the CIA sought and obtained access to all ‘product’ from the facility. After initial discriminatory restrictions on Australians employed in the Operations Room, by the end of the 1970s Australians were employed in all of its sections. Compared with arrangements at Pine Gap’s companion station in the United Kingdom, RAF Menwith Hill, Australian officials believe they have achieved a much more genuinely ‘joint’ facility, with command and employment arrangements exemplifying this. However, the fundamental realities are that not only does the vast bulk of tasking of satellites come from the United States and reflect its strategic priorities, but Australian participation in the base’s greatly expanded range of operations brings with it a measure of responsibility for the consequences of those operations. Authors Desmond Ball is Emeritus Professor at the Australian National University (ANU). He was a Special Professor at the ANU's Strategic and Defence Studies Centre from 1987 to 2013, and he served as Head of the Centre from 1984 to 1991. Bill Robinson writes the blog Lux Ex Umbra, which focuses on Canadian signals intelligence activities. He has been an active student of signals intelligence matters since the mid-1980s, and from 1986 to 2001 was on the staff of the Canadian peace research organization Project Ploughshares.
  • The Report of the Inquiry Into Unresolved Recognition for Past Acts of Naval and Military Gallantry and Valour

    The Report of the Inquiry Into Unresolved Recognition for Past Acts of Naval and Military Gallantry and Valour

    Defence Honours and Awards Appeals Tribunal THE REPORT OF THE INQUIRY INTO UNRESOLVED RECOGNITION FOR PAST ACTS OF NAVAL AND MILITARY GALLANTRY AND VALOUR THE REPORT OF THE INQUIRY INTO UNRESOLVED RECOGNITION FOR PAST ACTS OF NAVAL AND MILITARY GALLANTRY AND VALOUR This publication has been published by the Defence Honours and Awards Appeals Tribunal. Copies of this publication are available on the Tribunal’s website: www.defence-honours-tribunal.gov.au © Commonwealth of Australia 2013 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the Defence Honours and Awards Appeals Tribunal. Editing and design by Biotext, Canberra. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL INQUIRY INTO UNRESOLVED RECOGNITION FOR PAST ACTS OF NAVAL AND MILITARY GALLANTRY AND VALOUR Senator The Hon. David Feeney Parliamentary Secretary for Defence Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Dear Parliamentary Secretary, I am pleased to present the report of the Defence Honours and Awards Appeals Tribunal’s Inquiry into Unresolved Recognition for Past Acts of Naval and Military Gallantry and Valour. The Inquiry was conducted in accordance with the Terms of Reference. The Tribunal that conducted the Inquiry arrived unanimously at the findings and recommendations set out in this report. In accordance with the Defence Honours and Awards Appeals Tribunal Procedural Rules 2011, this report will be published on the Tribunal’s website — www.defence-honours-tribunal.gov.au — 20 working days after
  • Fourth Class 1934

    Fourth Class 1934

    Newsletter 1/1995 April 1995 Fourth Class 1934 E.G. Williams I have been moved to write of the events (some of them) in After dinner, where we were again assailed by multifarious my own era at the RMC, 1934-1937. I do this noting that questions, had proved the ~~ng-oleand had answered none of my classmates has put pen to paper - or else I have midday questions, I was told to learn the Jabbenvock and missed them. By a series of vignettes I will try to show some repeat it at breakfast. I don't know where I got hold of a copy of the humour and tears that were my lot in my first year as a of this Lewis Carroll horror, but I did and was prepared, at staff cadet at the RMC. 'lights out', to recite it and so to sleep. After being collected from Central Station, Sydney, with Or so I thought, but it was not to be, for shortly after 'lights my luggage, including a cabin trunk and articles of clothing out' the wind blew - the wind being three Third Class cadets which had been specified by a Captain B.W. Puiver (1916), I in my block who gripped hold of the end of the bed, pulled arrived at the steps of Duntroon Wing, Victoria Barracks. and lifted it to the vertical. I then got up and pulled the bed There I was accosted by two soldierly figures, in khaki drill into some semblance of order, but that wind was blowing jackets, trousers, boots, puttees and slouch hats who marched strongly.
  • Reviews and Contestability: New Directions for Defence

    Reviews and Contestability: New Directions for Defence

    STRATEGIC STRATEGIC INSIGHTS Reviews and contestability New directions for Defence 90 Ross Babbage, Allan Behm, Michael Clifford, Andrew Davies, Graeme Dobell, Jan K Gleiman, Paddy Gourley, Peter Jennings, John O’Callaghan and Mark Thomson Introduction The First Principles Review of Defence is arguably the most significant review of the defence establishment since the 1973 re-organisation led by Sir Arthur Tange. David Peever’s team recommended a radical streamlining of decision-making in the Defence Department cutting senior management roles, slashing the number of committees, and abolishing the Defence Materiel Organisation. This Strategic Insights brings together a series of contributions to ASPI’s blog The Strategist written by ten experts with long experience and broad knowledge of Australia’s defence bureaucracy. They include former senior defence bureaucrats and military officers as well as ASPI’s own team of analysts led by Peter Jennings, Andrew Davies and Mark Thomson. They bring a wealth of different perspectives and point to significant challenges ahead for Defence if the reforms proposed by the First Principles Review are to succeed. Wiring diagram image courtesy Flickr user Joe Flinthom. May 2015 2 Reviews and contestability: New directions for Defence First principles review: one more round of external oversight Mark Thomson, 22 August 2014 On 5 August, eleven months after coming to office, the government finally announced its long-promised First Principles Review of Defence. Although the review’s terms of reference have
  • Geoffrey Remington (1897-1968): a Most Unusual Citizen

    Geoffrey Remington (1897-1968): a Most Unusual Citizen

    Geoffrey Remington (1897-1968): a most unusual citizen Carmel Jane Maguire A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of New South Wales April 2012 CANDIDATE’S STATEMENT I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it contains no material previously published or written by another person nor material which to a substantial extent had been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma of a university or other institute of higher learning, except where due acknowledgement is made in the text. ……………………………………….. Carmel Maguire ii Frontispiece Geoffrey Cochrane Remington 1897-1968 iii ABSTRACT Developments over the past fifty years in the craft of life writing have opened new possibilities and new challenges for biographers. Historical sources have become much more accessible through digitization of files, especially when they are made available through online indexes if not full texts. There have been shifts in understandings of what constitutes biography. No longer can any topic in a subject’s life can be kept off limits. At the same time, there is a healthy and widespread realization, largely derived from postmodern ideas, that no biography can be definitive. Not only is it impossible to gather all the facts of anyone’s life, however voluminous the sources, the truth contained in them remains open to interpretation. So with Geoffrey Remington. Born into a privileged family, Geoffrey Remington’s youth was marked by tragedy in the suicide of his father in 1908; for the effect on him there is no direct evidence.
  • Ministers for Foreign Affairs 1972-83

    Ministers for Foreign Affairs 1972-83

    Ministers for Foreign Affairs 1972-83 Edited by Melissa Conley Tyler and John Robbins © The Australian Institute of International Affairs 2018 ISBN: 978-0-909992-04-0 This publication may be distributed on the condition that it is attributed to the Australian Institute of International Affairs. Any views or opinions expressed in this publication are not necessarily shared by the Australian Institute of International Affairs or any of its members or affiliates. Cover Image: © Tony Feder/Fairfax Syndication Australian Institute of International Affairs 32 Thesiger Court, Deakin ACT 2600, Australia Phone: 02 6282 2133 Facsimile: 02 6285 2334 Website:www.internationalaffairs.org.au Email:[email protected] Table of Contents Foreword Allan Gyngell AO FAIIA ......................................................... 1 Editors’ Note Melissa Conley Tyler and John Robbins CSC ........................ 3 Opening Remarks Zara Kimpton OAM ................................................................ 5 Australian Foreign Policy 1972-83: An Overview The Whitlam Government 1972-75: Gough Whitlam and Don Willesee ................................................................................ 11 Professor Peter Edwards AM FAIIA The Fraser Government 1975-1983: Andrew Peacock and Tony Street ............................................................................ 25 Dr David Lee Discussion ............................................................................. 49 Moderated by Emeritus Professor Peter Boyce AO Australia’s Relations
  • In from the Cold: Reflections on Australia's Korean

    In from the Cold: Reflections on Australia's Korean

    IN FROM THE COLD REFLECTIONS ON AUSTRALIA’S KOREAN WAR IN FROM THE COLD REFLECTIONS ON AUSTRALIA’S KOREAN WAR EDITED BY JOHN BLAXLAND, MICHAEL KELLY AND LIAM BREWIN HIGGINS Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] Available to download for free at press.anu.edu.au ISBN (print): 9781760462727 ISBN (online): 9781760462734 WorldCat (print): 1140933889 WorldCat (online): 1140933931 DOI: 10.22459/IFTC.2019 This title is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The full licence terms are available at creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode Cover design and layout by ANU Press. Cover photograph: The story of a patrol 15 miles into enemy territory, c. 1951. Photographer: A. Gulliver. Source: Argus Newspaper Collection of Photographs, State Library of Victoria. This edition © 2020 ANU Press CONTENTS Acknowledgements . vii List of maps and figures . ix Maps . xiii Chronology . .. xix Contributors . xxvii Glossary . xxxiii Introduction . 1 John Blaxland Part 1. Politics by other means: Strategic aims and responses 1 . Setting a new paradigm in world order: The United Nations action in Korea . 29 Robert O’Neill 2 . The Korean War: Which one? When? . 49 Allan Millett 3 . China’s war for Korea: Geostrategic decisions, war-fighting experience and high-priced benefits from intervention, 1950–53 . 61 Xiaobing Li 4 . Fighting in the giants’ playground: Australians in the Korean War . 87 Cameron Forbes 5 . The transformation of the Republic of Korea Army: Wartime expansion and doctrine changes, 1951–53 .
  • 2RARA RINGO October 2015

    2RARA RINGO October 2015

    2ND BATTALION ROYAL AUSTRALIAN REGIMENT ASSOCIATION, INC THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION South West Pacific, Japan, Korea, Malaya, Thai-Malay Border, South Vietnam, Cambodia, Rwanda, East Timor, Solomon Islands, Iraq, Timor - Lesté, Afghanistan RINGO nulli secundus Courage. Sacrifice. Mateship. NEWSLETTER OCTOBER 2015 PATRON: COLONEL JM CHURCH, DSO, (RETD) MATES, MEMORIES, & CAMARADERIE INSIDE THIS ISSUE The AGM will be held on Sat 31 Oct 15 in the ANZAC Room Founding Battalions 70th Anniversary Parade 1 Tweed Heads & Coolangatta RSL, the Commemoration Warriors Who Have Marched Out 2 Service at Chris Cunningham Park (under shade: The President’s Report 2 confirmed), and the annual get-together in the River Room What happens to your pension when you die? 5 Level 3 at Twin Towns Services Club. Entry is free, drinks & Malaya: An Individual View/The Pipeline Ambush 8-9 lunch at own expense: see venue choices next column. Our Presence in Malaysia by Brian Pannell 11 Notice of AGM, method of voting & outline Agenda are at Notice of Annual General Meeting (AGM) 11 page 11. Membership/Merchandise Form 12 PROGRAM FOUNDING BATTALIONS 70TH ANNIVERSARY PARADE Friday 30 October October 2015 marks the 70th Anniversary of the formation of 4.00pm Meet, Greet & Dine Harbour Lounge the 65th, 66th and 67th Battalions, later to be the 1st, 2nd (Indoor/Outdoor and 3rd Battalions, The Royal Australian Regiment. area), Level 1, Twin Towns Services The 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Battalions will together hold a Club, Wharf Street Ceremonial Parade at Lavarack Barracks on Monday 23rd November 2015. Saturday 31 October As part on the Ceremony, the 2nd and 3rd Battalions will 8.00 am Membership check ‘ANZAC Room’ have the honour of being presented replacement Queens Level 2, Mantra and Regimental Colours by the Governor-General, His Twin Towns Resort, Excellency General the Honourable Sir Peter Cosgrove, AK, Wharf Street MC, whilst the 1st Battalion will be awarded the Unit Citation 8.30 am Annual General (As above) Streamer for the Republic of Vietnam Cross of Gallantry with Meeting Palm.