DOCSLIB.ORG

Rico, Co Categorical Exclusion Waterline Replacement Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rico, Co Categorical Exclusion Waterline Replacement Project UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 8 1595 Wynkoop Street DENVER, CO 80202-1129 Phone 800-227-8917 http://www.epa.gov/region08 February 22, 2012 Rico, Colorado – Water System Improvements Categorical Exclusion for Special Appropriation Act Grant For categories of projects that are so minor in scope that they may be determined by EPA not to need a full environmental review. EPA makes the determination if a project will qualify for a Categorical Exclusion based on information provided by the grantee. Project Description: The Town of Rico, Colorado proposes to replace some of the Town’s existing drinking water distribution system. The proposed Project will consist of replacement of approximately 10,300 linear feet of existing 4 and 6 inch pipelines with 6 and 8 inch pipelines and associated valves, hydrants and bends. The majority of the pipelines are located in the north half of Rico (north of Mantz Avenue) as shown on the map in Attachment 1. The water system is over 30 years old and was bedded in mine waste shortening the life of the pipes. Numerous leaks have occurred in the last five years and the repairs indicate the distribution pipelines are in poor condition. [Information used to prepare categorical exclusion: Harris Engineering memorandum dated November 2, 2011sent via e-mail from Mike England.] Purpose and Need: The project will replace deteriorating water lines reducing leaks and increasing reliability of the water distribution system. 1 Cross-Cutters: Cross-Cutters still apply to all Special Appropriations Act Projects (SAAP) even if they are granted a categorical exclusion from the NEPA. The entire list of Cross-Cutters can be found in the SAAP Guidance memorandums. For additional information on potential Cross-Cutters see EPA's "Environmental Review Guide for Special Appropriations Grant," Appendix C (http://www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/ policies/nepa/environmental-review-guide-grants- pg.pdf). Typical Cross-Cutters that might apply to a Special Appropriations Act Project Historic, Archaeological or Cultural Sole Source Aquifer—mainly Missoula Resources in Region 8 Air Conformity -- Is the Project in a Near a Wild and Scenic River? Nonattainment Area? Any wetlands or waters of the U. S. Within a Floodplain? crossings? Environmental Justice On Prime Farmland? Threatened and Endangered Species Special Wildlife Habitat, Wildlife corridor The proposed water project will replace water lines in the vicinity of numerous historic structures. However, because the construction will take place in existing street and alley right- of-ways and the roadways were previously excavated to install the original waterline, EPA determined that the project is unlikely to adversely affect any historic properties. EPA's determination of effects to historic structures is included in the attachments to this document. The Colorado State Historic Preservation Officer concurred with EPA's finding in January 25, 2012 letter (copy attached). No other Cross-Cutters issues are anticipated for this project since the construction will be in existing roadways. The following Cross-Cutters have been considered and determined not to be of concern in this project: o Threatened and Endangered Species: The proposed project will not involve any federally listed threatened or endangered species or their habitats. o Within a Floodplain: No floodplains or flood hazards were identified that are associated with the proposed project. o Prime Farmland: The project will have no effect on prime or important farmland. o Wetlands: No previously inventoried wetlands or plants or soils characteristic of wetlands were found within the project area. 2 CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION CRITERIA (40 CFR 6.204(a)(1)(ii)) 1. NO known or expected potentially significant environmental impacts on public Yes health or the environment either individually or cumulatively over time. No □ 2. Is the project for minor upgrade or minor expansion of system capacity? Yes This includes, but is not limited to: minor extensions of sanitary sewers or force mains or No □ drinking water extensions to primarily serve existing development; stormwater detention pond and retention pond cleaning and dredging or minor storage increase or culvert upgrades to serve existing development. 3. Is the project for rehabilitation of existing facilities? Yes This includes, but is not limited to: functional replacement of existing systems and No □ components, infiltration and inflow corrections in the existing wastewater collection system or equipment rehabilitation at the existing wastewater plant, pumping, or storage facilities; drinking water system equipment replacement or modifications at an existing water plant, or pumping and storage facilities; stormwater culvert and outlet rehabilitation and repair. 4. Is the project for new minor ancillary facilities adjacent to or on the same Yes property as existing facilities? No □ This includes, but is not limited to: new wastewater facilities and equipment for sludge handling, screening, flow equalization, disinfection, or laboratory facilities; new drinking water facilities such as alum sludge handling, filtration, flow equalization, chemical storage, chlorination, or laboratory facilities; facilities at existing stormwater control locations, such as sedimentation basins, infiltration trenches, detention pond to retention pond retrofits, or oil and grit separators. If the answer to 1 is yes and at least one of answers to 2 through 4 are yes; then proceed to the next section: Excluding Factors. Conversely, if the answer to 1 is no, or if all answers to 2 through 4 are no then the project does not qualify for a categorical exclusion. Excluding Factors (40 CFR 6.204(b) (1) Project will have disproportionate impacts on any community: EJ, minority, etc. Yes □ No (1) Project will involve new or relocated discharges to surface or ground water Yes □ No (2) Project will result in substantial increases in the volume of discharge or the loadings Yes □ of pollutant to the receiving water No 3 (3) Project will provide capacity to serve a population 30 percent greater than the Yes □ existing population. No In the future, the project could provide additional capacit, if a higher-quality source of water is found. The increased water capacity would be used by the cheese plant located in this very small town of less than 600 people. Little to no additional population growth is anticipated as a result of this project. (4) Project will be in conflict with state or other regional growth plan or strategy Yes □ No (5) Project will directly or indirectly relate to upgrading or extending infrastructure Yes □ systems primarily for the purposes of future development No Categorical Exclusion Finding: Upon review of the application materials and NEPA regulations pertaining to the granting of a categorical exclusion determination, the EPA Region 8 finds that the Town of Rico Water Drinking Water Distribution System Improvements Special Appropriation Act Project Grant has met the criteria to be categorically excluded from further NEPA review. Prepared by: Dana Allen, Environmental Engineer 8EPR-N (303)312-6870 4 E<f~ HISTORY~ January 25, 2012 Suzanne Bohan Director NEPA Compliance and Review Program Office of Ecosystems Protection and Remediation United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 8 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, CO 80203 Re: Town of Rico Replacement of Drinking Water Lines. (CHS #61125) Dear Ms. Bohan: Thank you for your correspondence dated January 9, 2012 and received by our office on January 11, 2012regarding the review of the above-mentioned project under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (Section 106). After review of the provided information, we do not object that the Area of Potential Effects (APE) encompasses the buildings adjacent to the waterline replacement project. After review of the surveyed information, we concur that there is the potential to have buildings eligible for the National Register of Historic Places within the APE. We concur that the scope of the project does not have the potential to adversely affect historic properties located within the APE. Therefore, we concur with the recommended finding of no adverse effect [36 CFR 800.5(b)] under Section 106 for the proposed undertaking. If unidentified archaeological resources are discovered during construction, work must be interrupted until the resources have been evaluated in terms of the National Register criteria, 36 CRF 60.4, in consultation with this office. We request being involved in the consultation process with the local government, which as stipulated in 36 CFR 800.3 is required to be notified of the undertaking, and with other consulting parties. Additional information provided by the local government or consulting parties might cause our office to re-evaluate our eligibility and potential effect fmdings. Please note that our compliance letter does not end the 30-day review period provided to other consulting parties. If we may be of further assistance, please contact Amy Pallante, our Section 106 Compliance Manager, at (303) 866-4678. A_ Edward C. Nichols cr--state Historic Preservation Officer WWW.HISTORyCOLORADO.ORG HISTORY COLORADO CENTER 1200 BROADWAY DENVER COLORADO 80203 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 8 1595 Wynkoop Street DENVER, CO 80202-1129 Phone 800-227-8917 http://www.epa.gov/region08 Ref: 8EPR-N Edward C. Nichols State Historic Preservation Officer History Colorado 1200 Broadway Denver, CO 80203 Re: Section 106
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RHM Rocky 04.Indd
    RITZ OSPITALITY Rocky Mountain EditionH Fall & Winter 2005 PRSRT STD U.S. POSTAGE PAID PERMIT NO. 584 BOISE, ID Rocky Mtn ad 8/19/05 10:56 AM Page 1 See you along the way. 1.800.800.8000 super8.com Each motel is independently owned and operated under franchise agreement with Super 8 Motels, Inc. located in the Adirondack Mountains of NY State open mid-May to mid-October Contact Ken and Linda Nelson at: 315 - 357 - 4111 [email protected] P.O. Box 357 Inlet, New York 13360 4 • Ritz Hospitality www.ritzfamilypublishing.com Ritz Hospitality Rocky Mountain Edition Fall/Winter 2005 What’s Inside features sections Hunting & Fishing From The Goose hunting at Editor’s Desk .................... 6 North Platte Lodge ...................... 7 The economic importance of Travel PAGE 14 Hunting and Fishing ..................... 8 Colorado National Monument .... 16 Hunter teaches how Fuel-Effi cient Driving Tips ........... 18 to fi llet a deer ............................... 8 Be Bear Aware ............................ 19 In the Heart of Southwest Colorado’s Pheasant Country ........................ 9 East Pine Ranch .......................... 20 OHV Use Requires Common Big Hole National Monument ..... 23 Courtesy and Common Sense .... 10 Eliminating The “Are We Montana’s Upland Bird There Yet” Factor ......................... 24 Outlook ........................................ 11 Tips On Trips ............................... 28 Wildlife and Brucellosis in the Devil’s Tower ................................ 29 Greater Yellowstone Area ............ 12 Ice Fishing Primer ........................ 30 PAGE 22 Casper-a perfect combination of attractions, year round .............. 31 Cody. The Man. The Town. The Legend ................................ 33 Cody Country-Camping, Fishing, Hunting and More! ........................ 36 profi les The fun doesn’t stop when the snow fl ies in Cody Country.
    [Show full text]
  • All Grants Awarded Through Fiscal Year 2020 INTRODUCTION and KEY
    All Grants Awarded Through Fiscal Year 2020 INTRODUCTION AND KEY This report is a list of all grants awarded by the Colorado Historical Society’s State Historical Fund (SHF) since its inception in 1992 (state Fiscal Year 1993) through the end of Fiscal Year 2020. The amounts listed are the original award amounts. If for some reason the entire grant amount was not used (i.e. a project was terminated or was completed under budget) the full amount awarded will appear. In other instances grant awards were increased either to enable project completion or to cover the costs of easements. In these instances, the additional award amount is shown in a separate entry as an increase. In those cases where no work was accomplished and the funds were either declined by the grant recipient or were required to be returned to the SHF through rescissions, no entry will appear. For this reason, projects listed in one version of this report may not appear in later versions, and the financial information shown in this report may not be comparable to other revenue reports issued by the SHF. Grants listed in this report are identified by project ID number. The first two characters in the project ID number represent the fiscal year from which the grant was scheduled to be paid. The state is on a July 1 – June 30 fiscal year. So, for example, all grants made between July 1, 2006 and June 30, 2007 will be coded “07”. The next two characters identify the type of grant. In the case of grants that are awarded based on specific application due dates, the grant round in which the project was funded will be paired with either a letter or number.
    [Show full text]
  • RHM Rcky 03.Indd
    RITZ OSPITALITY Rocky Mountain EditionH Spring & Summer 2005 PRSRT STD U.S. POSTAGE PAID PERMIT NO. 584 BOISE, ID Rocky Mountain Edition Ritz Hospitality • 3 4 • Ritz Hospitality www.ritzfamilypublishing.com Ritz Hospitality Rocky Mountain Edition Spring/Summer 2005 What’s Inside features sections Lewis & Clark From The The Magic House Debuts New Editor’s Desk .................. 6 Interactive History Exhibit ....... 9 PAGE 15 Lewis & Clark Travel Signature Events .................. 10 A Current Adventure, In the Black Canyon of wake of Lewis & Clark .......... 12 the Gunnison ........................ 19 Commemorate vs. Celebrate 13 Tips On Trips ......................... 22 Plan to “Explore! The Big Sky” How To Pick Luggage at the National Lewis and Clark For Any Trip .......................... 23 Bicentennial Event ............... 29 Montana Highway 37 ............ 31 Stories Devil’s Tower, Wyoming ........ 38 For All You Have Given ......... 14 The Historic Sheridan Inn ..... 46 PAGE 25 Dead Man’s Cave Treasure ... 21 Across the Painted Desert Reno’s Crossing ................... 26 on Route 66 .......................... 63 Fort Laramie ......................... 44 Santa Rosa, NM Historic Deadwood ............... 56 City of Natural Lakes ............ 64 profi les Recreation Safe Trail Riding .................... 24 Colorado Where Early Anglers The Hitching Post Get the Worm ........................ 30 Bed And Breakfast ............... 16 Talk’n Rodeo ........................ 43 PAGE 33 Western Motel ....................... 18 South Park
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Introduction and Key
    History Colorado Colorado Historical Society State Historical Fund All Grants Awarded Through Fiscal Year 2010 INTRODUCTION AND KEY This report is a list of all grants awarded by the Colorado Historical Society’s State Historical Fund (SHF) since its inception in 1992 (state Fiscal Year 1993) through the end of Fiscal Year 2010. The amounts listed are the original award amounts. If for some reason the entire grant amount was not used (i.e., a project was terminated or was completed under budget) the full amount awarded will appear. In other instances grant awards were increased either to enable project completion or to cover the costs of easements. In these instances, the additional award amount is shown in a separate entry as an increase. In those cases where no work was accomplished and the funds were either declined by the grant recipient or were required to be returned to the SHF through rescissions, no entry will appear. For this reason, projects listed in one version of this report may not appear in later versions, and the financial information shown in this report may not be comparable to other revenue reports issued by the SHF. Grants listed in this report are identified by project ID number. The first two characters in the project ID number represent the fiscal year from which the grant was scheduled to be paid. The state is on a July 1 – June 30 fiscal year. So, for example, all grants made between July 1, 2009 and June 30, 2010 will be coded “10”. The next two characters identify the type of grant.
    [Show full text]
  • Active Enterprise Zone Contribution Projects April 2021.Xlsx
    Enterprise Zone Min donation Name Contribution Project Name Account Name Website Contact Name Contact Phone amount required Adams County EZ Almost Home, Inc Almost Home, Inc. almosthomeonline.org Rachel Monroe 303-659-6199 - Rocky Mountain Independent Electrical Workforce Training Contractors www.iecrm.org Kori Hemans 303-853-4886 - Clinica Colorado Clinica Colorado www.clinicacolorado.org Jill Schneider 720-443-8461 - Job Readiness Project Growing Home Inc. www.growinghome.org Pell Fender 720-407-1972 - Children's Hospital Colorado Children's Hospital Colorado www.childrenscolorado.org Katie Dugan 720-777-1234 $250.00) Discover Goodwill of Southern and Western Goodwill of Colorado Colorado www.discovermygoodwill.org Sheila Walker 719-785-9244 $250.00) Village Exchange Center- The Village Farm Amanda at Stanley Market Place Village Exchange Center www.villageexchangecenter.org Blaurock 202-2105565 $250.00) Central Colorado EZ Tabor Opera House Tabor Opera House Preservation Foundation Inc. www.taboroperahouse.net greg Decent 970-331-9874 - Heart Of The Rockies Regional Medical Center Heart of Rockies Regional Medical Center Foundation https://www.hrrmc.com/HRRMC-Foundation Lezlie Burkley 719-530-2218 $100.00) Lake County Edc Lake County www.lakecountyedc.com Marla Akridge 719-293-2316 $100.00) The Farm at Buena Vista Chaffee Housing Trust chaffeehousing.org Read McCulloch 719-239-1199 $250.00) Park County Housing - Summit Habitat for April-Dawn Humanity Habitat For Humanity Of Summit County summithabitat.org Knudsen 970 423-7445 $100.00) St. Thomas More Hospital St. Thomas More Hospital/Health Foundation https://www.centura.org/locations/st-thomas-more-hospital Debby Fowler 719-285-2000 $250.00) Cloud City Wheelers Cloud City Wheelers www.cloudcitywheelers.com Sterling Mudge 719-293-5606 $200.00) Karen St.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Historical Society State Historical Fund All Grants Awarded
    Colorado Historical Society State Historical Fund All Grants Awarded Through Fiscal Year 2009 INTRODUCTION AND KEY This report is a list of all grants awarded by the Colorado Historical Society’s State Historical Fund (SHF) since its inception in 1992 (state Fiscal Year 1993) through the end of Fiscal Year 2009. The amounts listed are the original award amounts. If for some reason the entire grant amount was not used (i.e. a project was terminated or was completed under budget) the full amount awarded will appear. In other instances grant awards were increased either to enable project completion or to cover the costs of easements. In these instances, the additional award amount is shown in a separate entry as an increase. In those cases where no work was accomplished and the funds were either declined by the grant recipient or were required to be returned to the SHF through rescissions, no entry will appear. For this reason, projects listed in one version of this report may not appear in later versions, and the financial information shown in this report may not be comparable to other revenue reports issued by the SHF. Grants listed in this report are identified by project ID number. The first two characters in the project ID number represent the fiscal year from which the grant was scheduled to be paid. The state is on a July 1 – June 30 fiscal year. So, for example, all grants made between July 1, 2008 and June 30, 2009 will be coded “09”. The next two characters identify the type of grant.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment for the Establishment of Low Altitude Training for Cannon AFB, New Mexico
    Environmental Assessment for the Establishment of Low Altitude Training for Cannon AFB, New Mexico Public comments on this Draft EA are requested pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 USC 4321, et seq. All written comments received during the comment period would be made available to the public and considered during Final EA preparation. The provision of private address information with your comment is voluntary and would not be released for any other purpose unless required by law. However, this information is used to compile the project mailing list and failure to provide it would result in your name not being included on the mailing list. August 2011 DRAFT FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI) INTRODUCTION -The Air Force is interested in obtaining public and agency comments on this revised proposal to designate a low altitude training area for training Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) aircrews. This Draft FONSI is provided as part of the attached Environmental Assessment for public and agency review. NAME OF PROPOSED ACTION - Establishment of Low Altitude Training for Cannon AFB, New Mexico. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION AND NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE - The United States Air Force (Air Force) proposes to designate a low altitude training area in northern New Mexico and southern Colorado where 27 Special Operations Wing (27 SOW) aircrews operating from Cannon AFB would train for worldwide operations under their global response commitment. Cannon AFB based MC-130J and CV-22 aircraft rely on darkness, terrain, and low altitude to provide masking during missions. 27 SOW aircrews are required to maintain flight proficiency in varying terrain including mountainous terrain, varying threat levels, different climatic conditions, and low altitude after dark missions to support Special Operations Forces.
    [Show full text]
  • August 2019 Packet
    Town of Rico Memorandum Date: August 13th, 2019 TO: Town of Rico Board of Trustees FROM: Kari Distefano SUBJECT: Town Manager’s Report 1. Katelyn Stokes special use application for the short-term rental of Lot 1A Atlantic Cable Subdivision Ms. Stokes would like to use her house, located at 101 S. Hinkley, as a short-term rental. To that end she has applied for a Special Use Permit as required by the Rico Land Use Code. The application is attached to this memo for your review and is complete. Special Use Permits should be reviewed according to the following criteria: Compatibility with Surrounding Area. The proposed use or operation is compatible with surrounding land uses and with the surrounding neighborhood. General. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of all proposed uses shall mitigate any adverse effects, including visual impacts, on surrounding properties. Noise. At no point on the bounding property line of any use in any district shall the sound pressure level of any use, operation or plant produce noise intensity greater than that customarily level of the underlying Zone District and surrounding neighborhood so as to create a nuisance or detract from the use and enjoyment of adjacent property. For the purposes of this section, bounding property line shall be interpreted as being at the far side of any street alley, stream or other permanently dedicated open space from the noise source when such open space exists between the property line of the noise source and adjacent property. When no such open space exists, the common line between two (2) parcels of property shall be interpreted as the bounding property line.
    [Show full text]
  • June 21St, 2019 TO: Town of Rico Board of Trustees FROM: Kari Distefano SUBJECT: Town Manager’S Report
    Town of Rico Memorandum Date: June 21st, 2019 TO: Town of Rico Board of Trustees FROM: Kari Distefano SUBJECT: Town Manager’s Report 1. Meeting with Great Ecology planner Chris Loftus and Mark Laska At the last meeting we had with representatives of BP, they invited (and funded) a planner from Great Ecology named Mark Laska. The intent was to help Rico master plan the river corridor area. I have been having conversations with Mr. Laska and his associate Chris Loftus. They will be here in Rico on Wednesday the 26th and Thursday the 27th to discuss mater planning efforts. 2. 2nd reading of an Ordinance establishing fire safety standards for existing commercial structures. The first reading of this ordinance passed in May. As a reminder The Rico Fire Department initially requested this Ordinance when there was a fire in the Prospector building. The object of the ordinance is to ensure that structures that are used for accommodations have adequate fire safety measures. The ordinance requires that all commercial structures that are being used for accommodations have fire alarms, carbon monoxide detectors and fire escape routes. It also has provisions for enforcement should the facility fail to provide such safety measures. We have added a requirement for anyone that wants to short term rent their house that they give us documentation of smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors. 3. Special Use Permit application the short-term rental of 209 S. Picker, Helen Matzik, Owner Helen Matzik has been using her house, located at 209 S. Picker, as a short-term rental.
    [Show full text]
  • Enterprise Zone Name Contribution Project Name Account Name
    Minimum Enterprise Website Contact Name Contact Phone Donation Zone Name Contribution Project Name Account Name Required Adams County EZ Almost Home, Inc Almost Home, Inc. almosthomeonline.org Shawna Miller 3036596199 Rocky Mountain Independent Electrical Workforce Training Contractors www.iecrm.org Kori Hemans 3038534886 Clinica Colorado Clinica Colorado www.clinicacolorado.org Jill Schneider 7204438461 Job Readiness Project Growing Home Inc. www.growinghome.org Anita Deshommes 7204071972 Kids In Need Of Dentistry Kids In Need Of Dentistry www.kindsmiles.org Sally Walker 3037333710 Bennett Waste Water Treatment Facility TOWN OF BENNETT townofbennett.org Rachel Summers 303-644-3249 $ 250 Town of Bennett Town Hall TOWN OF BENNETT www.townofbennett.org Rachel Summers 303-644-3249 $ 250 MCPN Aurora Community Health Center Metro Community Provider Network, Inc. www.mcpn.org Linda Skelley 3037611977 $ 100 Brighton Urban Renewal Authority and The The Armory At Brighton Cultural Center Heart of Brighton www.heartofbrighton.org Rodney Fair 3036593036 University Of Colorado Health Sciences - University Of Colorado Foundation, For Capital Campaign Benefit Of The University of Colorado Ans www.ucdenver.edu/anschutz Keller Young 3038137948 Platte Valley Medical Center Platte Valley Medical Center www.pvmc.org Carolyn Jannsen (303) 498-3630 Children's Hospital Colorado Children's Hospital Colorado childrenshospitalcoloradofoundation.org Katie Dugan 7207771724 $ 250 Central Colorado EZ Tabor Opera House Tabor Opera House Preservation Foundation www.taboroperahouse.net
    [Show full text]
  • Iowa City Historic Preservation Plan
    Iowa City Historic Preservation Plan IOWA CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN Prepared for the City of Iowa City and the Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission February 2008 City of Iowa City City Council Regenia Bailey, Mayor (District C) Mike O’Donnell, Mayor Pro Tem (At-Large) Connie Champion, (District B) Amy Correia, (At-Large) Matt Hayek, (At-Large) Ross Wilburn, (District A) Mike Wright, (At-Large) Dale Helling, Interim City Manager Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission Tim Weitzel, Chairperson Planning and Community Development Jeff Davidson, Director Robert Miklo, Senior Planner Sunil Terdalkar, Associate Planner Consultants SVENDSEN TYLER, INC. Sarona, Wisconsin Clarion Associates LLC Denver, Colorado Preparation of the Iowa City Historic Preservation Plan was funded by the City of Iowa City and a Historic Resource Development Program grant from Iowa’s Resource Enhancement and Protection (REAP) Program and administered by the State Historical Society of Iowa. Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................... I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 11 II. Overview of Local Historic Preservation Movement ............................................................. 15 A. Historic Preservation Movement Prior to 1992 ........................................................... 15 B. Adoption of Iowa City Historic
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A)
    NFS Form 10-900 0MB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) RECEIVED 2280 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places NAT. REGISTER (J Registration Form NATIONAL This form is for use in nominating or requesting determination for individual properties and districts. See instruction in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. • 1 . Name of Property historic name Dev Building other names/site number Metropole Saloon, Enterprise Cafe, 5DL479 2. Location street & number 3 N. Glasgow [N/A] not for publication city or town Rico ____ [N/A] vicinity state Colorado code CO county Dolores code 033 zip code 81332 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this [ x] nomination [ ] request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property [ x] meets [ ] does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant I ] nationally [ ] statewide [ x] locally.
    [Show full text]