DOCSLIB.ORG

2010 Introduction and Key

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2010 Introduction and Key History Colorado Colorado Historical Society State Historical Fund All Grants Awarded Through Fiscal Year 2010 INTRODUCTION AND KEY This report is a list of all grants awarded by the Colorado Historical Society’s State Historical Fund (SHF) since its inception in 1992 (state Fiscal Year 1993) through the end of Fiscal Year 2010. The amounts listed are the original award amounts. If for some reason the entire grant amount was not used (i.e., a project was terminated or was completed under budget) the full amount awarded will appear. In other instances grant awards were increased either to enable project completion or to cover the costs of easements. In these instances, the additional award amount is shown in a separate entry as an increase. In those cases where no work was accomplished and the funds were either declined by the grant recipient or were required to be returned to the SHF through rescissions, no entry will appear. For this reason, projects listed in one version of this report may not appear in later versions, and the financial information shown in this report may not be comparable to other revenue reports issued by the SHF. Grants listed in this report are identified by project ID number. The first two characters in the project ID number represent the fiscal year from which the grant was scheduled to be paid. The state is on a July 1 – June 30 fiscal year. So, for example, all grants made between July 1, 2009 and June 30, 2010 will be coded “10”. The next two characters identify the type of grant. In the case of grants that are awarded based on specific application due dates, the grant round in which the project was funded will be paired with either a letter or number. For example, the current grant calendar includes two competitive grant rounds. Grant applications are due April 1 and October 1 each year. Grants awarded from both grant rounds are disbursed from a single fiscal year’s revenues. Grants awarded from the April round will be coded with a “1” (e.g. M1, 01, C1), and grants awarded from the October round will be coded with a “2” (e.g. M2, 02, C2). In the first years of the program, as many as four grant rounds were held during a single fiscal year. There was only one grant round in FY97 and FY01. Grant categories without specific due dates, such as Emergency or Historic Structure Assessment grants, use a two- letter code because they are not associated with any particular grant round. The letter coding system follows: 0 – The number “0” identifies all general, competitive grants awarded since the inception of the program. The majority of all SHF grants are identified in this manner. M – “Mini Grants” awarded through the competitive process. The maximum request amount for these grants has changed over time, beginning at $5,000 in FY93, increasing to $10,000 in FY99, and reaching the present maximum request amount of $35,000 in FY09. AS – Noncompetitive Archaeological Assessment grants, first awarded in FY03. BG – Byways grants, awarded to the Department of Transportation as match to federal transportation funds and sub granted by CDOT to local byways projects in FY95 and FY96. C – Internal, noncompetitive, nonemergency grants to the Colorado Historical Society first awarded during FY98. Prior to that year, grants to CHS were awarded through the competitive process. Emergency grants to CHS will appear in the 0E code group with all other emergency grant projects. DL – Grants awarded to local governments for public projects in partnership with the Department of Local Affairs, first awarded in FY00. G – Grants that dealt with specific initiatives identified by the CHS Board of Directors. These grants were awarded in FY00 and FY01 only. HA – Noncompetitive Historic Structure Assessment grants, first awarded in FY00. 0E – Noncompetitive Emergency grants. P – Phased, competitive grants, provided multi-year support for larger projects. These grants were awarded between FY97 and FY01 only. T – Noncompetitive targeted grants intended to accomplish statewide goals, first awarded in FY97. The last three-digit number in the ID number represents the grant award number. This number is assigned shortly after the grant applications are received in the SHF office. Since not all grant applications are funded, the numbers that appear in this report will not be sequential. By way of example, grant ID number 10-01-011 is a General grant, awarded during the first grant round of Fiscal Year 2010, with an internal processing number of 011. Grant ID number 10-T1-001 is a noncompetitive grant awarded to accomplish statewide goals during the first grant round of Fiscal Year 2010, with an internal processing number of 001. This report is sorted by County/Location (typically City); followed by Applicant’s Name, ID number, and Property. The County/Location designations are based on the location of the project itself, not where the grant recipient is located. If a project is known to be located outside of the corporate limits of a city, its location is designated “Rural”. If a project affects the entire county, its county and location are designated “Countywide”. If a project affects more than one county, but is smaller than the entire state, its county and location are designated “Regional”. And, finally, if a project affects the entire state (i.e. large-scale education projects), its county and location are designated “Statewide”. The name used in the Property column is the property’s historic name. If a project is known to involve multiple properties (i.e. a survey project), the entry is “Various”. Finally, this report is current as of the date of its preparation. Several grant types are accepted and processed throughout the year, while other grant awards may be declined or rescinded at any time. Funded projects may be completed under budget, and the remaining funds returned to be awarded to other projects. The information in this report is therefore intended as informational only, providing examples of appropriate projects and basic location information. If more detailed information is required regarding a specific project, please contact the grant recipient or the SHF office. The files of the State Historical Fund are public records, and any project file listed in this report may be accessed by contacting our office at 303-866-2825. Grant Summary by County Fiscal Year 2010 Number Number of County Total Awarded County Total Awarded of Grants Grants Adams 36$ 1,130,317 La Plata 69$ 4,073,076 Alamosa 34$ 1,870,923 Lake 70$ 3,562,553 Arapahoe 42$ 2,223,103 Larimer 155$ 7,821,791 Archuleta 7$ 343,382 Las Animas 64$ 3,263,901 Baca 11$ 1,444,674 Lincoln 19$ 629,608 Bent 39$ 3,725,526 Logan 15$ 1,736,191 Boulder 191$ 7,802,430 Mesa 74$ 2,538,480 Broomfield 2$ 30,272 Mineral 11$ 330,136 Chaffee 56$ 2,560,249 Moffat 13$ 404,984 Cheyenne 10$ 476,803 Montezuma 124$ 6,429,210 Clear Creek 123$ 6,125,556 Montrose 40$ 1,819,783 Conejos 27$ 1,223,321 Morgan 28$ 2,314,364 Costilla 44$ 2,705,725 Otero 27$ 1,583,937 Crowley 12$ 579,148 Ouray 39$ 1,698,598 Custer 24$ 897,059 Park 53$ 1,781,713 Delta 28$ 798,528 Phillips 5$ 67,372 Denver 619$ 69,165,212 Pitkin 23$ 1,311,844 Dolores 24$ 1,060,837 Prowers 24$ 1,524,399 Douglas 70$ 2,990,435 Pueblo 94$ 6,665,808 Eagle 12$ 446,524 Regional 95$ 4,407,673 El Paso 146$ 9,516,653 Rio Blanco 13$ 657,821 Elbert 25$ 1,334,401 Rio Grande 41$ 2,540,768 Fremont 48$ 1,493,290 Routt 90$ 4,096,373 Garfield 25$ 1,058,343 Saguache 22$ 603,586 Gilpin 30$ 1,540,156 San Juan 54$ 4,475,264 Grand 20$ 379,465 San Miguel 43$ 2,275,096 Gunnison 68$ 3,400,449 Sedgwick 12$ 429,392 Hinsdale 22$ 976,219 Statewide 214$ 19,564,371 Huerfano 19$ 1,565,081 Summit 20$ 529,466 Jackson 15$ 730,349 Teller 63$ 2,836,216 Jefferson 180$ 7,867,247 Washington 16$ 553,043 Kiowa 16$ 1,605,592 Weld 99$ 5,070,538 Kit Carson 19 $ 859,135 Yuma 5 $ 138,806 Grand Total 3,779$ 247,193,951 The number and amounts of grants noted here may differ from data published in other SHF literature. For example, the costs for easements and covenants prior to FY2004 are not included in these calculations. Additionally, amounts may change if grant awards are declined or rescinded in the future. History Colorado, the Colorado Historical Society - State Historical Fund All Grants Awarded Through Fiscal Year 2010 (excludes declines and board rescissions) County/Location Applicant Name Description ID # Property Award Adams/Aurora City of Aurora Exterior Restoration 05-M2-033 Aurora Fox Theatre $ 8,942 Adams/Aurora City of Aurora Exterior Rehabilitation 07-02-002 Hornbein Building $ 74,973 Adams/Aurora City of Aurora-Parks and Open Space Archaeological Assessment 93-02-032 Moffitt Site $ 2,485 Department Adams/Aurora City of Aurora-Parks and Open Space Building Stabilization 95-01-018 Centennial House $ 20,000 Department Adams/Aurora City of Aurora-Parks and Open Space Historic Structure 01-HA-008 Guardhouse Building 9 $ 10,000 Department Assessment Guardhouse Building 10- Waterfowl Preserve Adams/Aurora Fitzsimons Redevelopment Authority Historic Structure 00-M1-030 Red Cross Building $ 9,000 Assessment Adams/Aurora University of Colorado Hospital Restoration of the 00-01-050 Fitzsimons General $ 61,100 Eisenhower Hospital Suite Hospital Adams/Aurora University of Colorado Hospital Restoration of the 00-01-050.01 Fitzsimons General $ 6,000 Eisenhower Hospital Suite Hospital (Increase FY-03) Adams/Bennett Town of Bennett Historic Structure 98-M2-004 Muegge House $ 3,750 Assessment and Feasibility Study Adams/Bennett Town of Bennett Interior and Exterior 00-P1-017 Muegge
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Offering Memorandum 1553 Steele St
    OFFERING MEMORANDUM 1553 STEELE ST. DENVER, CO 80206 AUSTIN SMITH JASON KOCH Investment Advisor Co-Founder/Principal [email protected] [email protected] 303.868.9096 303.918.8909 CONFIDENTIALITY DISCLAIMER This confidential Offering Memorandum, has been prepared by Nexus Commercial Realty for use by a limited number of qualified parties. This Offering Memorandum has been provided to you at your request based upon your assurances that you are a knowledgeable and sophisticated investor in commercial real estate projects and developments. Nexus Commercial Realty recommends you, as a potential buyer/investor, should perform your own independent examination and inspection of the property (the “Property”) and of all of the information provided herein related to the Property. By accepting this Offering Memorandum, you acknowledge and agree that you shall rely solely upon your own examination and investigation of the Property and you shall not rely on any statements made in this Offering Memorandum or upon any other materials, statements or information provided Nexus Commercial Realty or its brokers. Nexus Commercial Realty makes no guarantee, warranty or representation about the completeness or accuracy of the information set forth in this Offering Memorandum. You are responsible to independently verify its accuracy and completeness. Nexus Commercial Realty has prepared the information concerning the Property based upon assumptions relating to the general economy, its knowledge of other similar properties in the market, and on other market assumptions including factors beyond the control of the Nexus Commercial Realty and the Owner of the Property. Nexus Commercial Realty make no representation or warranty as to either the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein, and the information set forth in this Offering Memorandum in not intended to be a promise or representation as to the future performance of the Property.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado History Chronology
    Colorado History Chronology 13,000 B.C. Big game hunters may have occupied area later known as Colorado. Evidence shows that they were here by at least 9200 B.C. A.D. 1 to 1299 A.D. Advent of great Prehistoric Cliff Dwelling Civilization in the Mesa Verde region. 1276 to 1299 A.D. A great drought and/or pressure from nomadic tribes forced the Cliff Dwellers to abandon their Mesa Verde homes. 1500 A.D. Ute Indians inhabit mountain areas of southern Rocky Mountains making these Native Americans the oldest continuous residents of Colorado. 1541 A.D. Coronado, famed Spanish explorer, may have crossed the southeastern corner of present Colorado on his return march to Mexico after vain hunt for the golden Seven Cities of Cibola. 1682 A.D. Explorer La Salle appropriates for France all of the area now known as Colorado east of the Rocky Mountains. 1765 A.D. Juan Maria Rivera leads Spanish expedition into San Juan and Sangre de Cristo Mountains in search of gold and silver. 1776 A.D. Friars Escalante and Dominguez seeking route from Santa Fe to California missions, traverse what is now western Colorado as far north as the White River in Rio Blanco County. 1803 A.D. Through the Louisiana Purchase, signed by President Thomas Jefferson, the United States acquires a vast area which included what is now most of eastern Colorado. While the United States lays claim to this vast territory, Native Americans have resided here for hundreds of years. 1806 A.D. Lieutenant Zebulon M. Pike and small party of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Northwest Colorado
    II* 88055956 AN ISOLATED EMPIRE BLM Library Denver Federal Center Bldg. 50, OC-521 P-O. Box 25047 Denver, CO 80225 PARE* BY FREDERIC J. ATHEARN IrORIAh ORADO STATE OFFICE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 1976 f- W TABLE OF CONTENTS Wb Preface. i Introduction and Chronological Summary . iv I. Northwestern Colorado Prior to Exploitation . 1 II. The Fur Trade. j_j_ III. Exploration in Northwestern Colorado, 1839-1869 23 IV. Mining and Transportation in Early Western Colorado .... 34 V. Confrontations: Settlement Versus the Ute Indians. 45 VI. Settlement in Middle Park and the Yampa Valley. 63 VII. Development of the Cattle and Sheep Industry, 1868-1920... 76 VIII. Mining and Transportation, 1890-1920 .. 91 IX. The "Moffat Road" and Northwestern Colorado, 1903-1948 . 103 X. Development of Northwestern Colorado, 1890-1940. 115 Bibliography 2&sr \)6tWet’ PREFACE Pu£Eose: This study was undertaken to provide the basis for identification and evaluation of historic resources within the Craig, Colorado District of the Bureau of Land Management. The narrative of historic activities serves as a guide and yardstick regarding what physical evidence of these activities—historic sites, structures, ruins and objects—are known or suspected to be present on the land, and evaluation of what their historical significance may be. Such information is essential in making a wide variety of land management decisions effecting historic cultural resources. Objectives: As a basic cultural resource inventory and evaluation tool, the narrative and initial inventory of known historic resources will serve a variety of objectives: 1. Provide information for basic Bureau planning docu¬ ments and land management decisions relating to cultural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • General Vertical Files Anderson Reading Room Center for Southwest Research Zimmerman Library
    “A” – biographical Abiquiu, NM GUIDE TO THE GENERAL VERTICAL FILES ANDERSON READING ROOM CENTER FOR SOUTHWEST RESEARCH ZIMMERMAN LIBRARY (See UNM Archives Vertical Files http://rmoa.unm.edu/docviewer.php?docId=nmuunmverticalfiles.xml) FOLDER HEADINGS “A” – biographical Alpha folders contain clippings about various misc. individuals, artists, writers, etc, whose names begin with “A.” Alpha folders exist for most letters of the alphabet. Abbey, Edward – author Abeita, Jim – artist – Navajo Abell, Bertha M. – first Anglo born near Albuquerque Abeyta / Abeita – biographical information of people with this surname Abeyta, Tony – painter - Navajo Abiquiu, NM – General – Catholic – Christ in the Desert Monastery – Dam and Reservoir Abo Pass - history. See also Salinas National Monument Abousleman – biographical information of people with this surname Afghanistan War – NM – See also Iraq War Abousleman – biographical information of people with this surname Abrams, Jonathan – art collector Abreu, Margaret Silva – author: Hispanic, folklore, foods Abruzzo, Ben – balloonist. See also Ballooning, Albuquerque Balloon Fiesta Acequias – ditches (canoas, ground wáter, surface wáter, puming, water rights (See also Land Grants; Rio Grande Valley; Water; and Santa Fe - Acequia Madre) Acequias – Albuquerque, map 2005-2006 – ditch system in city Acequias – Colorado (San Luis) Ackerman, Mae N. – Masonic leader Acoma Pueblo - Sky City. See also Indian gaming. See also Pueblos – General; and Onate, Juan de Acuff, Mark – newspaper editor – NM Independent and
    [Show full text]
  • The High-Stakes Consequences of Low-Stakes Gambling for Black Hawk, Central City and Cripple Creek, Colorado: a Commentary
    Uneasy Money: The High-Stakes Consequences of Low-Stakes Gambling for Black Hawk, Central City and Cripple Creek, Colorado: A Commentary Duane A. Smith and Eric L. Clements* limb the hills above Central City or Black Society's board of directors. 1 In the past three years Hawk and a sight will unfold that has not he has collected more than thirty-eight accounts of old been seen since the days of their mining and new ghosts in the two towns. Cglory--bright lights, hustle and bustle, and the The gambling movement which stirred these specters noise of communities in the throes of a boom. Cripple started back in the late 1980s and has mushroomed Creek has not enjoyed quite the same degree of since then. In so many ways, it proved reminiscent of resurrection, but it too enjoys a prosperity unknown the rushes of 1859 into Gilpin County and 1892 into for generations. No, it is not the rumble of ore Teller County. The idea of "getting rich without wagons, the pounding of stamps, the voices of miners working" pervaded both excitements, and in each and their families, nor the dull thud of explosions far more people by far failed than succeeded. Buildings underground causing this boom. Gambling is the game went up as businessmen and women raced to get in on of the day. It might not be mining in the true sense of the ground floor, and many of them failed as well-­ the word, but miners would understand "mining" the twelve casinos in Central City alone, along with dealer investors' pocket books.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report (PDF)
    1 TABLE OF Pulling Together CONTENTS Nowhere did we see a greater display of unity coalescence than in the way AMIT pulled together President’s Message 03 during the pandemic in the early months of 2020. While this annual report will share our proud UNITY in Caring for Our accomplishments in 2019, when the health crisis Most Vulnerable Kids 04 hit, many opportunities arose for unity, which was UNITY in Educational expressed in new and unexpected ways within AMIT. Excellence 05 Since its inception 95 years ago, AMIT has faced its Academy of challenges. Through thick and thin, wars and strife, Entrepreneurship & Innovation 06 and the big hurdles of this small nation, AMIT has been steadfast in its vision and commitment to educate AMIT’s Unique children and create the next generation of strong, Evaluation & Assessment Platform 07 proud, and contributing Israeli citizens. UNITY in Leveling the That Vision Playing Field 08 Has Real Results UNITY in Zionism 09 In 2019, AMIT was voted Israel’s #1 Educational Network for the third year in a row. Our bagrut diploma UNITY in rate climbed to 86 percent, outpacing the national rate Jewish Values 10 of 70 percent. Our students brought home awards Your Impact 11 and accolades in academics, athletics, STEM-centered competitions, and more. Financials 13 And then in the early months of 2020 with the onset Dedications 15 of the pandemic, instead of constricting in fear and uncertainty, AMIT expanded in a wellspring of giving, Board of Directors 16 creativity, and optimism. Students jumped to do chesed Giving Societies 17 to help Israel’s most vulnerable citizens and pivoted to an online distance learning platform during the two months schools were closed.
    [Show full text]
  • German Jews in the United States: a Guide to Archival Collections
    GERMAN HISTORICAL INSTITUTE,WASHINGTON,DC REFERENCE GUIDE 24 GERMAN JEWS IN THE UNITED STATES: AGUIDE TO ARCHIVAL COLLECTIONS Contents INTRODUCTION &ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 1 ABOUT THE EDITOR 6 ARCHIVAL COLLECTIONS (arranged alphabetically by state and then city) ALABAMA Montgomery 1. Alabama Department of Archives and History ................................ 7 ARIZONA Phoenix 2. Arizona Jewish Historical Society ........................................................ 8 ARKANSAS Little Rock 3. Arkansas History Commission and State Archives .......................... 9 CALIFORNIA Berkeley 4. University of California, Berkeley: Bancroft Library, Archives .................................................................................................. 10 5. Judah L. Mages Museum: Western Jewish History Center ........... 14 Beverly Hills 6. Acad. of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences: Margaret Herrick Library, Special Coll. ............................................................................ 16 Davis 7. University of California at Davis: Shields Library, Special Collections and Archives ..................................................................... 16 Long Beach 8. California State Library, Long Beach: Special Collections ............. 17 Los Angeles 9. John F. Kennedy Memorial Library: Special Collections ...............18 10. UCLA Film and Television Archive .................................................. 18 11. USC: Doheny Memorial Library, Lion Feuchtwanger Archive ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • University of Michigan Radiocarbon Dates Xii H
    [Ru)Ioc!RBo1, Vol.. 10, 1968, P. 61-114] UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN RADIOCARBON DATES XII H. R. CRANE and JAMES B. GRIFFIN The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan The following is a list of dates obtained since the compilation of List XI in December 1965. The method is essentially the same as de- scribed in that list. Two C02-CS2 Geiger counter systems were used. Equipment and counting techniques have been described elsewhere (Crane, 1961). Dates and estimates of error in this list follow the practice recommended by the International Radiocarbon Dating Conferences of 1962 and 1965, in that (a) dates are computed on the basis of the Libby half-life, 5570 yr, (b) A.D. 1950 is used as the zero of the age scale, and (c) the errors quoted are the standard deviations obtained from the numbers of counts only. In previous Michigan date lists up to and in- cluding VII, we have quoted errors at least twice as great as the statisti- cal errors of counting, to take account of other errors in the over-all process. If the reader wishes to obtain a standard deviation figure which will allow ample room for the many sources of error in the dating process, we suggest doubling the figures that are given in this list. We wish to acknowledge the help of Patricia Dahlstrom in pre- paring chemical samples and David M. Griffin and Linda B. Halsey in preparing the descriptions. I. GEOLOGIC SAMPLES 9240 ± 1000 M-1291. Hosterman's Pit, Pennsylvania 7290 B.C. Charcoal from Hosterman's Pit (40° 53' 34" N Lat, 77° 26' 22" W Long), Centre Co., Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Aiello Public Relations & Marketing Wendy Aiello/303-619-5162
    IMMEDIATE RELEASE Media Contact: Aiello Public Relations & Marketing Wendy Aiello/303-619-5162 (Cell) 303-355-3838 (Office) AEG PRESENTS ANNOUNCES THE MISSION BALLROOM, A REVOLUTIONARY CONCERT EXPERIENCE OPENING IN DENVER’S RINO NEIGHBORHOOD SUMMER 2019 State-of-the-art venue will serve as the anchor tenant at Westfield Company’s North Wynkoop 14-acre mixed use development DENVER, CO (April 9, 2018) – AEG Presents Rocky Mountains, one of the world's leading ​ ​ ​ ​ producers and promoters of live entertainment, announced today The Mission Ballroom, a ​ ​ ​ scalable, state-of-the art concert venue scheduled to open in summer 2019. The 60,000 ​ square-foot ballroom will anchor North Wynkoop, a new 14-acre mixed use project by ​ ​ Denver-developers Westfield Company, located at the north-end of the RiNo neighborhood th ​ rd ​ ​ between 40 ​ and 43 ​ Streets along Brighton Blvd. ​ ​ Chuck Morris, CEO of AEG Presents Rocky Mountains, said of the new venue, “Our entire AEG Presents Rocky Mountain team spent the last 11 years searching for the perfect location and the right design to build one of the finest venues this town has ever seen. With features including a moving stage that provides The Mission flexible capacity from 2200 to 3950 guests, unrivaled sight lines and state-of-the-art sound and lights, The Mission will bring Colorado the most cutting-edge concert experience in the world.” AEG Presents Rocky Mountains, the leading promoter in Denver, CO who operate the Bluebird Theater, Gothic Theatre, Ogden Theatre, 1STBANK Center and Fiddler’s Green Amphitheatre, as well as book the majority of the shows at Red Rocks Amphitheatre, bring decades of experience to the development and design of The Mission Ballroom.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Background Study, Curecanti Recreation Area, Colorado
    •••••a••• ••••a••••aa•a COLORADO Historical Background Study By BENJAMIN LEVY DIVISION OF HISTORY Office of Areheology and Historic Preservation October 15, 1968 National Park Service B&WScans U.S. Department of the Interior ..S·fb·~~ FOREIDRD The object of th.is study is to provide the historical data necessary :fOJ: the proper development of a Master Plan for Curecanti Rec:ceation Area, Colorado. This study, authorized by Resource Study Proposal (RSP) CURE-H-1, seeks to identi:fy historical resources and historic sites lo­ cated within or closely associated with the recreation area. Such an undertaking will enable master planning teams to consider the use o:f historical data in interpre­ tive and development programs and provide £or the protection 0£ historic sites and structures. Ideally, thE! background study ought to precede the master plan team's field investigation. The urgency 0£ the Curecanti plan r1equired this investigation to be undertaken immediately at the beginning of the current :fiscal year and compelled it to be done while the team was in the field. Hopefully, this report will have found its way into the team's hands prior to their completion report. This report does not pretend to be a detailed or de­ £ini tive study of the history 0£ the Curecanti area. The urgency of the c:all of this document and the limited time assigned for its preparation permit little more than the examination of secondary sources, although little i published mateI'ial exists on the history ox that stretch of the Gunnison River from Montrose to Gunnison city.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Conference Report 2021 PARTNERS in the OUTDOORS CONFERENCE
    w COLORADO PARKS & WILDLIFE Post-Conference Report 2021 PARTNERS IN THE OUTDOORS CONFERENCE 2021 PARTNERS IN THE OUTDOORS CONFERENCE Photo: @CaptureTheAction Page 1 Partners in the Outdoors Dear Partners in the Outdoors Conference Community, Things were a little different this year... again. We didn’t have the pleasure of meeting in person to network and build relationships in a face to face setting. However, as we learned last year, the pandemic has provided an opportunity to extend our reach beyond the physical walls of a conference venue. Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW), with the advice of the many partners serving on our conference planning committee (see page 14), determined that it would be best to host a scaled back virtual conference to address zoom fatigue and the saturated market of webinars that we are all experiencing. Accordingly, the conference agenda included a total of just nine virtual events. However, each of these events were timely and relevant to the outdoor and natural resource management industries in Colorado. I am pleased to report that we have continued our growth trajectory with over 2,250 people participating in our conference representing nearly 400 organizations! This includes the 950 people who attended our sessions live and another 1,300 views of our conference recordings. We kicked things off in late April with two nationally renowned keynote speakers, Eduardo Garcia and Dr. J. Drew Lanham, who shared their inspiring stories related to their lives and careers in the outdoors. We then hosted a series of partner and CPW led sessions that supported the priority areas identified in our Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP).
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    20_574310 bindex.qxd 1/28/05 12:00 AM Page 460 Index Arapahoe Basin, 68, 292 Auto racing A AA (American Automo- Arapaho National Forest, Colorado Springs, 175 bile Association), 54 286 Denver, 122 Accommodations, 27, 38–40 Arapaho National Fort Morgan, 237 best, 9–10 Recreation Area, 286 Pueblo, 437 Active sports and recre- Arapaho-Roosevelt National Avery House, 217 ational activities, 60–71 Forest and Pawnee Adams State College–Luther Grasslands, 220, 221, 224 E. Bean Museum, 429 Arcade Amusements, Inc., B aby Doe Tabor Museum, Adventure Golf, 111 172 318 Aerial sports (glider flying Argo Gold Mine, Mill, and Bachelor Historic Tour, 432 and soaring). See also Museum, 138 Bachelor-Syracuse Mine Ballooning A. R. Mitchell Memorial Tour, 403 Boulder, 205 Museum of Western Art, Backcountry ski tours, Colorado Springs, 173 443 Vail, 307 Durango, 374 Art Castings of Colorado, Backcountry yurt system, Airfares, 26–27, 32–33, 53 230 State Forest State Park, Air Force Academy Falcons, Art Center of Estes Park, 222–223 175 246 Backpacking. See Hiking Airlines, 31, 36, 52–53 Art on the Corner, 346 and backpacking Airport security, 32 Aspen, 321–334 Balcony House, 389 Alamosa, 3, 426–430 accommodations, Ballooning, 62, 117–118, Alamosa–Monte Vista 329–333 173, 204 National Wildlife museums, art centers, and Banana Fun Park, 346 Refuges, 430 historic sites, 327–329 Bandimere Speedway, 122 Alpine Slide music festivals, 328 Barr Lake, 66 Durango Mountain Resort, nightlife, 334 Barr Lake State Park, 374 restaurants, 333–334 118, 121 Winter Park, 286
    [Show full text]