DOCSLIB.ORG

Colorado Historical Society State Historical Fund All Grants Awarded

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Colorado Historical Society State Historical Fund All Grants Awarded Colorado Historical Society State Historical Fund All Grants Awarded Through Fiscal Year 2009 INTRODUCTION AND KEY This report is a list of all grants awarded by the Colorado Historical Society’s State Historical Fund (SHF) since its inception in 1992 (state Fiscal Year 1993) through the end of Fiscal Year 2009. The amounts listed are the original award amounts. If for some reason the entire grant amount was not used (i.e. a project was terminated or was completed under budget) the full amount awarded will appear. In other instances grant awards were increased either to enable project completion or to cover the costs of easements. In these instances, the additional award amount is shown in a separate entry as an increase. In those cases where no work was accomplished and the funds were either declined by the grant recipient or were required to be returned to the SHF through rescissions, no entry will appear. For this reason, projects listed in one version of this report may not appear in later versions, and the financial information shown in this report may not be comparable to other revenue reports issued by the SHF. Grants listed in this report are identified by project ID number. The first two characters in the project ID number represent the fiscal year from which the grant was scheduled to be paid. The state is on a July 1 – June 30 fiscal year. So, for example, all grants made between July 1, 2008 and June 30, 2009 will be coded “09”. The next two characters identify the type of grant. In the case of grants that are awarded based on specific application due dates, the grant round in which the project was funded will be paired with either a letter or number. For example, the current grant calendar includes two competitive grant rounds. Grant applications are due April 1 and October 1 each year. Grants awarded from both grant rounds are disbursed from a single fiscal year’s revenues. Grants awarded from the April round will be coded with a “1” (e.g. M1, 01, C1), and grants awarded from the October round will be coded with a “2” (e.g. M2, 02, C2). In the first years of the program, as many as four grant rounds were held during a single fiscal year. There was only one grant round in FY97 and FY01. Grant categories without specific due dates, such as Emergency or Historic Structure Assessment grants, use a two- letter code because they are not associated with any particular grant round. The letter coding system follows: 0 – The number “0” identifies all general, competitive grants awarded since the inception of the program. The majority of all SHF grants are identified in this manner. M – “Mini Grants” awarded through the competitive process. The maximum request amount for these grants has changed over time, beginning at $5,000 in FY93, increasing to $10,000 in FY99, and reaching the present maximum request amount of $35,000 in FY09. AS – Noncompetitive Archaeological Assessment grants, first awarded in FY03. BG – Byways grants, awarded to the Department of Transportation as match to federal transportation funds and sub granted by CDOT to local byways projects in FY95 and FY96. C – Internal, noncompetitive, nonemergency grants to the Colorado Historical Society first awarded during FY98. Prior to that year, grants to CHS were awarded through the competitive process. Emergency grants to CHS will appear in the 0E code group with all other emergency grant projects. DL – Grants awarded to local governments for public projects in partnership with the Department of Local Affairs, first awarded in FY00. G – Grants that dealt with specific initiatives identified by the CHS Board of Directors. These grants were awarded in FY00 and FY01 only. HA – Noncompetitive Historic Structure Assessment grants, first awarded in FY00. 0E – Noncompetitive Emergency grants. P – Phased, competitive grants, provided multi-year support for larger projects. These grants were awarded between FY97 and FY01 only. T – Noncompetitive targeted grants intended to accomplish statewide goals, first awarded in FY97. The last three-digit number in the ID number represents the grant award number. This number is assigned shortly after the grant applications are received in the SHF office. Since not all grant applications are funded, the numbers that appear in this report will not be sequential. By way of example, grant ID number 09-01-017 is a General grant, awarded during the first grant round of Fiscal Year 2009, with an internal processing number of 017. Grant ID number 09-T1-001 is a noncompetitive grant awarded to accomplish statewide goals during the first grant round of Fiscal Year 2009, with an internal processing number of 001. This report is sorted by County/Location (typically City); followed by Applicant’s Name, ID number, and Property. The County/Location designations are based on the location of the project itself, not where the grant recipient is located. If a project is known to be located outside of the corporate limits of a city, its location is designated “Rural”. If a project affects the entire county, its county and location are designated “Countywide”. If a project affects more than one county, but is smaller than the entire state, its county and location are designated “Regional”. And, finally, if a project affects the entire state (i.e. large-scale education projects), its county and location are designated “Statewide”. The name used in the Property column is the property’s historic name. If a project is known to involve multiple properties (i.e. a survey project), the entry is “Various”. Finally, this report is current as of the date of its preparation. Several grant types are accepted and processed throughout the year, while other grant awards may be declined or rescinded at any time. Funded projects may be completed under budget, and the remaining funds returned to be awarded to other projects. The information in this report is therefore intended as informational only, providing examples of appropriate projects and basic location information. If more detailed information is required regarding a specific project, please contact the grant recipient or the SHF office. The files of the State Historical Fund are public records, and any project file listed in this report may be accessed by contacting our office at 303-866-2825. Grant Summary by County Fiscal Year 2009 Number Number County Total Awarded County Total Awarded of Grants of Grants Adams 34$ 893,317 La Plata 64$ 3,448,019 Alamosa 32$ 1,656,937 Lake 70$ 3,562,553 Arapahoe 41$ 2,048,096 Larimer 148$ 7,345,207 Archuleta 7$ 343,382 Las Animas 62$ 3,218,141 Baca 10$ 1,429,941 Lincoln 19$ 629,608 Bent 35$ 3,204,171 Logan 14$ 1,655,339 Boulder 187$ 7,530,614 Mesa 73$ 2,528,480 Broomfield 2$ 30,272 Mineral 10$ 320,136 Chaffee 52$ 2,229,847 Moffat 10$ 294,013 Cheyenne 10$ 476,803 Montezuma 118$ 5,859,070 Clear Creek 116$ 5,815,627 Montrose 39$ 1,784,783 Conejos 25$ 1,104,410 Morgan 26$ 2,057,273 Costilla 41$ 2,675,700 Otero 27$ 1,583,937 Crowley 11$ 404,148 Ouray 37$ 1,457,598 Custer 24$ 897,059 Park 49$ 1,662,344 Delta 25$ 766,348 Phillips 5$ 67,372 Denver 589$ 66,732,226 Pitkin 22$ 1,033,519 Dolores 23$ 1,027,549 Prowers 20$ 1,427,467 Douglas 64$ 2,712,793 Pueblo 89$ 6,048,810 Eagle 8$ 170,952 Regional 86$ 3,760,648 El Paso 134$ 8,666,443 Rio Blanco 13$ 657,821 Elbert 22$ 1,256,970 Rio Grande 40$ 2,506,737 Fremont 45$ 1,344,890 Routt 83$ 3,458,452 Garfield 24$ 908,423 Saguache 20$ 251,657 Gilpin 29$ 1,474,815 San Juan 50$ 3,756,446 Grand 20$ 379,465 San Miguel 42$ 2,265,096 Gunnison 64$ 3,292,914 Sedgwick 12$ 429,392 Hinsdale 20$ 880,071 Statewide 207$ 18,920,545 Huerfano 18$ 1,551,435 Summit 20$ 529,466 Jackson 15$ 730,349 Teller 59$ 2,523,969 Jefferson 172$ 7,455,314 Washington 16$ 553,043 Kiowa 13$ 1,184,339 Weld 92$ 4,594,550 Kit Carson 19 $ 859,135 Yuma 5 $ 138,806 Grand Total 3,578$ 222,465,052 The number and amounts of grants noted here may differ from data published in other SHF literature. For example, the costs for easements and covenants prior to FY2004 are not included in these calculations. Additionally, amounts may change if grant awards are declined or rescinded in the future. Colorado Historical Society, State Historical Fund All Grants Awarded Through Fiscal Year 2009 (excludes declines and board rescissions) County/Location Applicant Name Description ID # Property Award Adams/Aurora City of Aurora Exterior Restoration 05-M2-033 Aurora Fox Theatre $ 8,942 Adams/Aurora City of Aurora Exterior Rehabilitation 07-02-002 Hornbein Building $ 74,973 Adams/Aurora City of Aurora-Parks and Open Space Archaeological Assessment 93-02-032 Moffitt Site $ 2,485 Department Adams/Aurora City of Aurora-Parks and Open Space Building Stabilization 95-01-018 Centennial House $ 20,000 Department Adams/Aurora City of Aurora-Parks and Open Space Historic Structure 01-HA-008 Guardhouse Building 9 $ 10,000 Department Assessment Guardhouse Building 10- Waterfowl Preserve Adams/Aurora Fitzsimons Redevelopment Authority Historic Structure 00-M1-030 Red Cross Building $ 9,000 Assessment Adams/Aurora University of Colorado Hospital Restoration of the 00-01-050 Fitzsimons General $ 61,100 Eisenhower Hospital Suite Hospital Adams/Aurora University of Colorado Hospital Restoration of the 00-01-050.01 Fitzsimons General $ 6,000 Eisenhower Hospital Suite Hospital (Increase FY-03) Adams/Bennett Town of Bennett Historic Structure 98-M2-004 Muegge House $ 3,750 Assessment and Feasibility Study Adams/Bennett Town of Bennett Interior and Exterior 00-P1-017 Muegge House $ 51,397 Rehabilitation Adams/Brighton
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Railway Employee Records for Colorado Volume Iii
    RAILWAY EMPLOYEE RECORDS FOR COLORADO VOLUME III By Gerald E. Sherard (2005) When Denver’s Union Station opened in 1881, it saw 88 trains a day during its gold-rush peak. When passenger trains were a popular way to travel, Union Station regularly saw sixty to eighty daily arrivals and departures and as many as a million passengers a year. Many freight trains also passed through the area. In the early 1900s, there were 2.25 million railroad workers in America. After World War II the popularity and frequency of train travel began to wane. The first railroad line to be completed in Colorado was in 1871 and was the Denver and Rio Grande Railroad line between Denver and Colorado Springs. A question we often hear is: “My father used to work for the railroad. How can I get information on Him?” Most railroad historical societies have no records on employees. Most employment records are owned today by the surviving railroad companies and the Railroad Retirement Board. For example, most such records for the Union Pacific Railroad are in storage in Hutchinson, Kansas salt mines, off limits to all but the lawyers. The Union Pacific currently declines to help with former employee genealogy requests. However, if you are looking for railroad employee records for early Colorado railroads, you may have some success. The Colorado Railroad Museum Library currently has 11,368 employee personnel records. These Colorado employee records are primarily for the following railroads which are not longer operating. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad (AT&SF) Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad employee records of employment are recorded in a bound ledger book (record number 736) and box numbers 766 and 1287 for the years 1883 through 1939 for the joint line from Denver to Pueblo.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado History Chronology
    Colorado History Chronology 13,000 B.C. Big game hunters may have occupied area later known as Colorado. Evidence shows that they were here by at least 9200 B.C. A.D. 1 to 1299 A.D. Advent of great Prehistoric Cliff Dwelling Civilization in the Mesa Verde region. 1276 to 1299 A.D. A great drought and/or pressure from nomadic tribes forced the Cliff Dwellers to abandon their Mesa Verde homes. 1500 A.D. Ute Indians inhabit mountain areas of southern Rocky Mountains making these Native Americans the oldest continuous residents of Colorado. 1541 A.D. Coronado, famed Spanish explorer, may have crossed the southeastern corner of present Colorado on his return march to Mexico after vain hunt for the golden Seven Cities of Cibola. 1682 A.D. Explorer La Salle appropriates for France all of the area now known as Colorado east of the Rocky Mountains. 1765 A.D. Juan Maria Rivera leads Spanish expedition into San Juan and Sangre de Cristo Mountains in search of gold and silver. 1776 A.D. Friars Escalante and Dominguez seeking route from Santa Fe to California missions, traverse what is now western Colorado as far north as the White River in Rio Blanco County. 1803 A.D. Through the Louisiana Purchase, signed by President Thomas Jefferson, the United States acquires a vast area which included what is now most of eastern Colorado. While the United States lays claim to this vast territory, Native Americans have resided here for hundreds of years. 1806 A.D. Lieutenant Zebulon M. Pike and small party of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Denver Union Station Awarded LEED Certification Transit Hub Awarded Green Honor for Major 2014 Renovation
    Denver Union Station awarded LEED certification Transit hub awarded green honor for major 2014 renovation DENVER - (July 25, 2016) – Denver Union Station is pleased to announce that it has been awarded LEED Certification from the U.S. Green Building Council. Denver Union Station has become downtown Denver’s hottest gathering place since it reopened in July 2014 after a $54 million renovation, with a major goal of making the multi-use transportation hub as environmentally friendly as possible. Several local Colorado companies were involved in the historic building’s rejuvenation, including Larimer Associates, McWhinney, REGen, LLC, Sage Hospitality and Urban Neighborhoods. Originally opened in 1891, Denver Union Station is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Denver Union Station was awarded LEED points for implementing a variety of green initiatives, including: • Development density & community connectivity • Building reuse - more than 90% of the historic building’s existing structural elements were reused, including the original floors, walls & roof • Providing easy access to public transportation, including RTD’s new University of Colorado A Line to Denver International Airport and B Line to Westminster • Diverting more than 50% of construction waste from landfills. • Using low-emitting paints and flooring materials in the renovation • Regionally manufactured materials were used whenever possible • Asbestos contamination in the building was remediated Denver Union Station is home the 112-room luxury independent Crawford Hotel and 12 Colorado restaurants and retailers. A sampling of their green initiatives: • Stoic & Genuine uses the Environmental Defense Fund Seafood Charts as a guideline when ordering sustainable fish and more than 90% of its oysters are ocean–farmed • Next Door Union Station sources local produce from Colorado farmers, ranchers and other purveyors and is Zero Waste, composting all food scraps from tables and excess food from its kitchen • PigTrain Coffee Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Museums in Denver"
    "Best Museums in Denver" Realizzata per : Cityseeker 6 Posizioni indicati Denver Firefighters Museum "Fire Station No. 1" Back in 1909, Fire Station Number One housed Denver's Engine Company Number One. The building is now home to the Denver Firefighters Museum which preserves, exhibits and celebrates the rich firefighting history of the city. The museum houses over 30,000 exhibits, including firemen related documents and photographs dating back to the 1860s, by Jeffrey Beall various antique firefighting equipment and other memorabilia. There are various activities that visitors, especially children, can partake in from engaging in hands-on activities like fire prevention techniques, children's pole, to trying on firefighting gear, calling 911 and more. +1 303 892 1436 www.denverfirefightersm info@denverfirefightersmu 1326 Tremont Place, Denver useum.org seum.org CO Denver Art Museum "Extensive Native American Art Collection" This five-floor museum is wonderfully diverse and is at the forefront of offering new exhibits. In the past, it has featured impressionist artists as well as the work of Winslow Homer. This museum brags— and rightfully so— about housing one of the largest art collections between Kansas City and the West Coast. It's Native American art collection, which by Ray Tsang from Irvine, encompasses an entire floor, is not to be missed. In addition, 2006 USA heralded the dedication of a new wing of the museum. Designed by Daniel Libeskind, the Frederic C. Hamilton building adds to the already stunning architecture of the cityscape and has become a popular attraction for museum visitors. +1 720 865 5000 www.denverartmuseum.org/ 100 West 14th Avenue Parkway, Denver CO Molly Brown House Museum "Home of A Famous Titanic Survivor" This restored Victorian mansion, once the home of legendary Denver resident Maggie (Molly) Brown now serves as a popular museum that attracts more than 40,000 visitors a year.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pdf of the Tour
    Welcome to Historic Denver’s Molly Brown House Museum! Together we will explore this home and the story of a woman you may know as “Molly.” The true story however of Margaret Tobin Brown reveals a leader and activist whose lasting legacy shows the impact we all can have when we rally a community around a common cause. Another person in this house’s history who left behind a legacy is Art Leisenring, the owner of this House of Lions in the 1960s. When it came time for Art to move on, he worried that if he put 1340 Pennsylvania up for sale, it would be torn down like other houses on the block. In a grassroots effort, he gathered community members and together they founded Historic Denver, Inc. to save and restore the Molly Brown House. 50 years on, Historic Denver continues to own and operate the Molly Brown House Museum. And, as a leading preservation organization, we advocate on behalf of the diverse places and spaces all around the city. We know that historic places and the history they reveal can inspire us to take collective action today and ensure a better future for all; a vison shared, no doubt, by Art Leisenring and Margaret Brown. Enjoy your tour and thank you for supporting Historic Denver! Page 1 of 19 Exhibit Introduction This year we celebrate Historic Denver’s 50th anniversary of preserving the places that matter at its first save – the Molly Brown House Museum! Through an in-house exhibit, Looking Forward / Looking Back, you’ll learn about the work undertaken to restore each room, find treasures that tell the Brown family story, and meet the founders of Historic Denver.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Northwest Colorado
    II* 88055956 AN ISOLATED EMPIRE BLM Library Denver Federal Center Bldg. 50, OC-521 P-O. Box 25047 Denver, CO 80225 PARE* BY FREDERIC J. ATHEARN IrORIAh ORADO STATE OFFICE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 1976 f- W TABLE OF CONTENTS Wb Preface. i Introduction and Chronological Summary . iv I. Northwestern Colorado Prior to Exploitation . 1 II. The Fur Trade. j_j_ III. Exploration in Northwestern Colorado, 1839-1869 23 IV. Mining and Transportation in Early Western Colorado .... 34 V. Confrontations: Settlement Versus the Ute Indians. 45 VI. Settlement in Middle Park and the Yampa Valley. 63 VII. Development of the Cattle and Sheep Industry, 1868-1920... 76 VIII. Mining and Transportation, 1890-1920 .. 91 IX. The "Moffat Road" and Northwestern Colorado, 1903-1948 . 103 X. Development of Northwestern Colorado, 1890-1940. 115 Bibliography 2&sr \)6tWet’ PREFACE Pu£Eose: This study was undertaken to provide the basis for identification and evaluation of historic resources within the Craig, Colorado District of the Bureau of Land Management. The narrative of historic activities serves as a guide and yardstick regarding what physical evidence of these activities—historic sites, structures, ruins and objects—are known or suspected to be present on the land, and evaluation of what their historical significance may be. Such information is essential in making a wide variety of land management decisions effecting historic cultural resources. Objectives: As a basic cultural resource inventory and evaluation tool, the narrative and initial inventory of known historic resources will serve a variety of objectives: 1. Provide information for basic Bureau planning docu¬ ments and land management decisions relating to cultural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • General Vertical Files Anderson Reading Room Center for Southwest Research Zimmerman Library
    “A” – biographical Abiquiu, NM GUIDE TO THE GENERAL VERTICAL FILES ANDERSON READING ROOM CENTER FOR SOUTHWEST RESEARCH ZIMMERMAN LIBRARY (See UNM Archives Vertical Files http://rmoa.unm.edu/docviewer.php?docId=nmuunmverticalfiles.xml) FOLDER HEADINGS “A” – biographical Alpha folders contain clippings about various misc. individuals, artists, writers, etc, whose names begin with “A.” Alpha folders exist for most letters of the alphabet. Abbey, Edward – author Abeita, Jim – artist – Navajo Abell, Bertha M. – first Anglo born near Albuquerque Abeyta / Abeita – biographical information of people with this surname Abeyta, Tony – painter - Navajo Abiquiu, NM – General – Catholic – Christ in the Desert Monastery – Dam and Reservoir Abo Pass - history. See also Salinas National Monument Abousleman – biographical information of people with this surname Afghanistan War – NM – See also Iraq War Abousleman – biographical information of people with this surname Abrams, Jonathan – art collector Abreu, Margaret Silva – author: Hispanic, folklore, foods Abruzzo, Ben – balloonist. See also Ballooning, Albuquerque Balloon Fiesta Acequias – ditches (canoas, ground wáter, surface wáter, puming, water rights (See also Land Grants; Rio Grande Valley; Water; and Santa Fe - Acequia Madre) Acequias – Albuquerque, map 2005-2006 – ditch system in city Acequias – Colorado (San Luis) Ackerman, Mae N. – Masonic leader Acoma Pueblo - Sky City. See also Indian gaming. See also Pueblos – General; and Onate, Juan de Acuff, Mark – newspaper editor – NM Independent and
    [Show full text]
  • Director, El Pueblo History Museum This Announcement Is Not Governed by the Selection Processes of the Classified Personnel System
    8/1/2019 Job Bulletin STATE OF COLORADO invites applications for the position of: Director, El Pueblo History Museum This announcement is not governed by the selection processes of the classified personnel system. Applications will be considered from residents and non-residents of Colorado. CLASS TITLE: NON-CLASSIFIED LOCATION: Pueblo, Colorado PRIMARY PHYSICAL WORK ADDRESS: 301 N. Union Ave, Pueblo, CO 81003 SALARY: $4,583.33 - $4,861.00 Monthly FLSA STATUS: Exempt; position is not eligible for overtime compensation. OPENING DATE: 08/01/19 CLOSING DATE: 08/18/19 11:59 PM JOB TYPE: Full Time DEPARTMENT INFORMATION: If you are considering a career opportunity with the goal of making a difference, consider joining the dedicated people of History Colorado. Our professionals inspire generations to find wonder and meaning in our past and to engage in creating a better Colorado. Pueblo is a beautiful, small city in southern Colorado, rich in multi-cultural heritage and traditions. El Pueblo History Museum is in the heart of the city's historic downtown, creative arts district and blocks away from the Historic Riverwalk. El Pueblo History Museum is a strong catalyst within this community and is known for strengthening communities and neighborhoods. El Pueblo History Museum is a nationally-recognized museum whose success is grounded in community engagement and community-centered programs and exhibits. El Pueblo History Museum presents the history of Pueblo, CO, together with the cultural and ethnic groups of the region. The historic site includes a re-created 1840s abode style trading post and plaza, and the archaeological excavation site of the original 1842 El Pueblo trading post.
    [Show full text]
  • The High-Stakes Consequences of Low-Stakes Gambling for Black Hawk, Central City and Cripple Creek, Colorado: a Commentary
    Uneasy Money: The High-Stakes Consequences of Low-Stakes Gambling for Black Hawk, Central City and Cripple Creek, Colorado: A Commentary Duane A. Smith and Eric L. Clements* limb the hills above Central City or Black Society's board of directors. 1 In the past three years Hawk and a sight will unfold that has not he has collected more than thirty-eight accounts of old been seen since the days of their mining and new ghosts in the two towns. Cglory--bright lights, hustle and bustle, and the The gambling movement which stirred these specters noise of communities in the throes of a boom. Cripple started back in the late 1980s and has mushroomed Creek has not enjoyed quite the same degree of since then. In so many ways, it proved reminiscent of resurrection, but it too enjoys a prosperity unknown the rushes of 1859 into Gilpin County and 1892 into for generations. No, it is not the rumble of ore Teller County. The idea of "getting rich without wagons, the pounding of stamps, the voices of miners working" pervaded both excitements, and in each and their families, nor the dull thud of explosions far more people by far failed than succeeded. Buildings underground causing this boom. Gambling is the game went up as businessmen and women raced to get in on of the day. It might not be mining in the true sense of the ground floor, and many of them failed as well-­ the word, but miners would understand "mining" the twelve casinos in Central City alone, along with dealer investors' pocket books.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This
    NPS Form 10-000 OMB No. 1024-0018 (R»v. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places R-Y221990 Registration Form NATIONAL This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for Individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and sub-categories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property_________________________________________________ historic name Central City-Black Hawk Historic District______________* _^~~_______ other names/site number 2. Location street & number Colorado Highway 119 and 279 I not for publication city, town Central City, Black Hawk and Nevadville LI vicinity state Colorado code CO county Gilpin code 047 zip code 80427 & 80411 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property |X~1 private n building(s) Contributing Noncontributlng OTl public-local [X~1 district 401 59 buildings I I public-State I I site 10 0 . sites I I public-Federal I I structure 17 . structures I I object 0 objects 414 76 Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously ________N/A___________ listed in the National Register _2____ 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this CU nomination d] request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties In the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Background Study, Curecanti Recreation Area, Colorado
    •••••a••• ••••a••••aa•a COLORADO Historical Background Study By BENJAMIN LEVY DIVISION OF HISTORY Office of Areheology and Historic Preservation October 15, 1968 National Park Service B&WScans U.S. Department of the Interior ..S·fb·~~ FOREIDRD The object of th.is study is to provide the historical data necessary :fOJ: the proper development of a Master Plan for Curecanti Rec:ceation Area, Colorado. This study, authorized by Resource Study Proposal (RSP) CURE-H-1, seeks to identi:fy historical resources and historic sites lo­ cated within or closely associated with the recreation area. Such an undertaking will enable master planning teams to consider the use o:f historical data in interpre­ tive and development programs and provide £or the protection 0£ historic sites and structures. Ideally, thE! background study ought to precede the master plan team's field investigation. The urgency 0£ the Curecanti plan r1equired this investigation to be undertaken immediately at the beginning of the current :fiscal year and compelled it to be done while the team was in the field. Hopefully, this report will have found its way into the team's hands prior to their completion report. This report does not pretend to be a detailed or de­ £ini tive study of the history 0£ the Curecanti area. The urgency of the c:all of this document and the limited time assigned for its preparation permit little more than the examination of secondary sources, although little i published mateI'ial exists on the history ox that stretch of the Gunnison River from Montrose to Gunnison city.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Conference Report 2021 PARTNERS in the OUTDOORS CONFERENCE
    w COLORADO PARKS & WILDLIFE Post-Conference Report 2021 PARTNERS IN THE OUTDOORS CONFERENCE 2021 PARTNERS IN THE OUTDOORS CONFERENCE Photo: @CaptureTheAction Page 1 Partners in the Outdoors Dear Partners in the Outdoors Conference Community, Things were a little different this year... again. We didn’t have the pleasure of meeting in person to network and build relationships in a face to face setting. However, as we learned last year, the pandemic has provided an opportunity to extend our reach beyond the physical walls of a conference venue. Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW), with the advice of the many partners serving on our conference planning committee (see page 14), determined that it would be best to host a scaled back virtual conference to address zoom fatigue and the saturated market of webinars that we are all experiencing. Accordingly, the conference agenda included a total of just nine virtual events. However, each of these events were timely and relevant to the outdoor and natural resource management industries in Colorado. I am pleased to report that we have continued our growth trajectory with over 2,250 people participating in our conference representing nearly 400 organizations! This includes the 950 people who attended our sessions live and another 1,300 views of our conference recordings. We kicked things off in late April with two nationally renowned keynote speakers, Eduardo Garcia and Dr. J. Drew Lanham, who shared their inspiring stories related to their lives and careers in the outdoors. We then hosted a series of partner and CPW led sessions that supported the priority areas identified in our Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP).
    [Show full text]