DOCSLIB.ORG

Senate Floor on January 7 of Did So

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 105 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 143 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, MARCH 19, 1997 No. 36 Senate The Senate met at 10:30 a.m. and was Senate Joint Resolution 23, the Leahy RESERVATION OF LEADER TIME called to order by the President pro resolution. Following debate on these The PRESIDING OFFICER. If the tempore [Mr. THURMOND]. resolutions, Senators should anticipate Senator will suspend, under the pre- stacked rollcall votes at approximately vious order the leadership time is re- PRAYER 11:30. served. The Chaplain, Dr. Lloyd John Following disposition of these resolu- f Ogilvie, offered the following prayer: tions, the Senate may proceed to either Sovereign God, we submit our lives the certification of Mexico or the nom- APPOINTMENT OF AN INDE- to Your authority. Fill our minds with ination of Merrick Garland. Additional PENDENT COUNSEL TO INVES- clear convictions that You are in votes are, therefore, possible during to- TIGATE ALLEGATIONS OF ILLE- charge of our lives and our work today. day’s session following the stacked GAL FUNDRAISING We commit it all to You. votes. Mr. BENNETT. Mr. President, under May this commitment result in a The majority leader has asked me to the previous order, we now have an new, positive attitude that exudes joy remind Senators that this is the last hour of debate equally divided, and I and hope about what You are going to week prior to our adjournment for the have been designated as the manager do today and in the future. We leave 2-week Easter recess, so he would ap- to control the time on this side. I do the results completely in Your hands. preciate Senators continuing to co- not see a colleague yet who will con- Our need is not to get control of our operate and adjusting their schedules trol the time on the other side. lives, but to commit our lives to Your accordingly for the scheduling of legis- The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under control. You know what You are doing lation and votes. the previous order, the Senate will now and will only what is best for us and I thank my colleagues for their at- proceed to Senate Joint Resolution 22 our Nation. tention. for 1 hour, with 30 minutes under the There is nothing that can happen control of the distinguished Senator from Utah, 20 minutes under the con- that You cannot use to deepen our re- f lationship with You. So when success trol of Senator LEAHY, and 10 minutes comes, help us to develop an attitude under the control of Senator BYRD. UNANIMOUS-CONSENT AGREE- The clerk will report. of gratitude. When difficulties arise, MENT—NOMINATION OF MERRICK The legislative clerk read as follows: help us immediately turn to You and B. GARLAND A joint resolution (S.J. Res. 22) to express receive from You an attitude of for- the sense of the Congress concerning the ap- titude. Mr. BENNETT. Mr. President, as in executive session, I ask unanimous plication by the Attorney General for the ap- We place our hands in Yours and ask pointment of an independent counsel to in- You to lead us. Through our Lord and consent that at 3 o’clock today the vestigate allegations of illegal fundraising in Savior. Amen. Senate proceed to executive session to the 1996 Presidential election campaign. consider the nomination of Merrick B. f The Senate resumed consideration of Garland, to be U.S. circuit judge, and the joint resolution. RECOGNITION OF THE ACTING for it to be considered under the fol- The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Sen- MAJORITY LEADER lowing time agreement: 3 hours equally ator from Utah. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The divided in the usual form. I further ask Mr. BENNETT. Mr. President, some able acting majority leader is recog- unanimous consent that immediately general observations prior to getting nized. following the expiration or yielding into the details of this resolution, I f back of the debate time, the Senate think, are in order. As this matter has proceed to a vote on the confirmation come before the Nation in the form of SCHEDULE of the nomination, and immediately press reports, television commentary, Mr. BENNETT. Mr. President, on be- following that vote, the President be newspaper analyses, et cetera, some- half of the majority leader, I announce immediately notified of the Senate’s thing that is very disturbing to me has that today the Senate will resume con- action and the Senate resume legisla- happened. That is, a single cloak of sideration of Senate Joint Resolution tive business. suspicion regarding illegalities and im- 22, the independent counsel resolution. It is my understanding this has been proprieties has been cast over all as- By previous order, from 10:30 a.m. to cleared on the Democratic side. pects of anything relating to campaign 11:30 a.m., the Senate will conclude de- The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. financing, campaign fundraising, and bate on Senate Joint Resolution 22, the HAGEL). Without objection, it is so or- campaign expenditures. Somehow, any- independent counsel resolution, and dered. thing related to raising money or ∑ This ‘‘bullet’’ symbol identifies statements or insertions which are not spoken by a Member of the Senate on the floor. S2491 . VerDate Mar 15 2010 22:17 Oct 24, 2013 Jkt 081600 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\1997SENATE\S19MR7.REC S19MR7 mmaher on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with SOCIALSECURITY S2492 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE March 19, 1997 spending money in a campaign has now that went into bringing people into the tion perfectly clear that I do not think become tainted, and we find people in White House, whether it is for over- we should appoint an independent the press and people in this Chamber nights in the Lincoln bedroom, orga- counsel because people in the press, or casting aspersions that, in my view, nized and orchestrated by the Presi- people in this Chamber, get all exer- are inappropriate and uncalled for. dent’s own hand, or for the coffees, as cised about activities in the three I would like to set the terms of the they were called, has reached a level of areas I have just described. None of discussion in this fashion. I suggest unprecedented pattern of activity, and them is serious enough to justify an that, of course, the first dividing line is I consider it to be inappropriate. independent counsel. Let’s focus on the between that which is legal and that I will stipulate that it apparently fourth area I have described, which I which is illegal. Many times in the was not illegal. That does not mean we consider to be the truly sinister areas. press reports no one is making this di- should not comment about it, we Mr. President, with that general viding line. They are attacking any- should not express our opinions about statement and overview, I am prepared thing dealing with fundraising as if it its appropriateness. But, clearly, it now to turn to my colleague from were all the same and all in the same does not call for the appointment of an Michigan and yield such time to him as pot. We should make it clear, we independent counsel. It is something he may require from his 30 minutes so should understand that many of the we can talk about in the political that we keep the time balanced in this things that are done for political fund- arena. It is on the legal side of the line. debate. raising are perfectly legal and, in my If we think it is inappropriate, we Mr. LEVIN. I thank my friend from view, perfectly appropriate, while there should say so. If we think the pattern Utah. are other things that are clearly ille- of activity in this area is just over- The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Sen- gal, and obviously anything illegal is whelmingly improper, we have the ator from Michigan. not appropriate. right to say so. But we must recognize, Mr. LEVIN. I thank the Senator for If I may, I was disturbed by some of once again, that some of that activity his invariable courtesy. I ask unani- the comments made on this floor with may clearly not have been illegal. mous consent that I be yielded 10 min- respect to the actions of the majority Drawing the line and coming over to utes. Senator LEAHY is not yet here, leader, primarily by the minority lead- the side of that which is illegal, I find, but I ask that, I am sure with his ap- er. The suggestion was left in the once again, there are degrees of ille- proval. minds of some people that the majority gality. Let me give you an example The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without leader was being accused of doing that has been heavily reported in the objection, it is so ordered. something illegal or improper by urg- press: the receipt of a $50,000 check by Mr. LEVIN. Mr. President, we will be ing people to attend a Republican fund- Maggie Williams, the chief of staff to voting on two resolutions later this raiser and urging people to support the the First Lady, while Ms. Williams was morning. The first resolution, that of Republican Party. Not only was it not in the White House. That apparently is the majority leader, is a clearly par- illegal nor was it improper, it was per- illegal. tisan document, for a number of rea- fectly appropriate for the majority Naturally, we take breaking of the sons which I will get into in a moment.
Recommended publications
  • Federal Government

    Federal Government

    FEDERAL GOVERNMENT Chapter 5 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 261 PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES George W. Bush – Texas (R) Term: Serving second term expiring January 2009. Profession: Businessman; Professional Baseball Team Owner; Texas Governor, 1995-2000. Education: Received B.S., Yale University, 1968; M.B.A., Harvard University, 1975. Military Service: Texas Air National Guard, 1968-1973. Residence: Born in New Haven, CT. Resident of Texas. Family Members: Wife, Laura Welch Bush; two daughters. www.whitehouse.gov VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES Richard B. Cheney – Wyoming (R) Term: Serving second term expiring January 2009. Profession: Public Official; White House Chief of Staff to President Gerald Ford, 1975-1977; U.S. Congressman, Wyoming, 1979-1989; Secretary of Defense, 1989-1993; Chief Executive Officer of the Halliburton Company. Education: Received B.A., University of Wyoming, 1965; M.A., University of Wyoming, 1966. Residence: Born in Lincoln, NE. Resident of Wyo- ming. Family Members: Wife, Lynne V. Cheney; two daugh- ters. www.whitehouse.gov 262 IOWA OFFICIAL REGISTER U.S. SENATOR Charles E. Grassley – New Hartford (R) Term: Serving fifth term in U.S. Senate expiring January 2011. Profession and Activities: Farmer and partner with son, Robin. Member: Baptist Church, Farm Bureau, Iowa Historical Society, Pi Gamma Mu, Kappa Delta Pi, Mason, International Association of Machinists, 1962-1971. Member: Iowa House of Representatives, 1959-1975; U.S. House of Representatives, 1975-1981. Elected to U.S. Senate, 1980; reelected 1986, 1992,
  • The Balancing Act of Devolution

    The Balancing Act of Devolution

    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2001 A Conversation on Federalism and the States: The Balancing Act of Devolution Peter B. Edelman Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/358 64 Alb. L. Rev. 1091-1132 (2001) This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Social Welfare Law Commons GEORGETOWN LAW Faculty Publications April 2010 A Conversation on Federalism and the States: The Balancing Act of Devolution 64 Alb. L. Rev. 1091-1132 (2001) Peter B. Edelman Professor of Law Georgetown University Law Center [email protected] This paper can be downloaded without charge from: Scholarly Commons: http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/358/ Posted with permission of the author A CONVERSATION ON FEDERALISM AND THE STATES: THE BALANCING ACT OF DEVOLUTION Welcome and Introduction: Martha F. Davis, Vice-President and Legal Director, NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund; Kate Stoneman Visiting Professor, Albany Law School (Fall 2000). Moderator: David L. Markell, Professor of Law at Albany Law School. Discussants: Andrew G. Celli, Jr., Chief of the Civil Rights Bureau, New York State Attorney General's Office. Peter Edelman, Professor of Law at Georgetown Law Center and founder of the Law Center's family poverty clinic. Don Friedman, Senior Policy Analyst with the Community Food Resource Center. Peter Lehner, Chief of the Environmental Protection Bureau, New York State Attorney General's Office.
  • Chapman Law Review

    Chapman Law Review

    Chapman Law Review Volume 21 Board of Editors 2017–2018 Executive Board Editor-in-Chief LAUREN K. FITZPATRICK Managing Editor RYAN W. COOPER Senior Articles Editors Production Editor SUNEETA H. ISRANI MARISSA N. HAMILTON TAYLOR A. KENDZIERSKI CLARE M. WERNET Senior Notes & Comments Editor TAYLOR B. BROWN Senior Symposium Editor CINDY PARK Senior Submissions & Online Editor ALBERTO WILCHES –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Articles Editors ASHLEY C. ANDERSON KRISTEN N. KOVACICH ARLENE GALARZA STEVEN L. RIMMER NATALIE M. GAONA AMANDA M. SHAUGHNESSY-FORD ANAM A. JAVED DAMION M. YOUNG __________________________________________________________________ Staff Editors RAYMOND AUBELE AMY N. HUDACK JAMIE L. RICE CARLOS BACIO MEGAN A. LEE JAMIE L. TRAXLER HOPE C. BLAIN DANTE P. LOGIE BRANDON R. SALVATIERRA GEORGE E. BRIETIGAM DRAKE A. MIRSCH HANNAH B. STETSON KATHERINE A. BURGESS MARLENA MLYNARSKA SYDNEY L. WEST KYLEY S. CHELWICK NICHOLE N. MOVASSAGHI Faculty Advisor CELESTINE MCCONVILLE, Professor of Law CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY HAZEM H. CHEHABI ADMINISTRATION JEROME W. CWIERTNIA DALE E. FOWLER ’58 DANIELE C. STRUPPA BARRY GOLDFARB President STAN HARRELSON GAVIN S. HERBERT,JR. GLENN M. PFEIFFER WILLIAM K. HOOD Provost and Executive Vice ANDY HOROWITZ President for Academic Affairs MARK CHAPIN JOHNSON ’05 JENNIFER L. KELLER HAROLD W. HEWITT,JR. THOMAS E. MALLOY Executive Vice President and Chief SEBASTIAN PAUL MUSCO Operating Officer RICHARD MUTH (MBA ’05) JAMES J. PETERSON SHERYL A. BOURGEOIS HARRY S. RINKER Executive Vice President for JAMES B. ROSZAK University Advancement THE HONORABLE LORETTA SANCHEZ ’82 HELEN NORRIS MOHINDAR S. SANDHU Vice President and Chief RONALD M. SIMON Information Officer RONALD E. SODERLING KAREN R. WILKINSON ’69 THOMAS C. PIECHOTA DAVID W.
  • June 16, 2020 the Honorable Chuck

    June 16, 2020 the Honorable Chuck

    June 16, 2020 The Honorable Chuck Grassley The Honorable Ron Wyden Chair Ranking Member Committee on Finance Committee on Finance United States Senate United States Senate 219 Dirksen Senate Office Building 219 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20515 Re: Telehealth Services Dear Chairman Grassley and Ranking Member Wyden: America’s Physician Groups would like to thank you for your efforts to address the struggles that healthcare organizations have faced during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Initiatives resulting from the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES) Act legislation such as the Paycheck Protection Program, the expansion of telehealth programs, and the Public Health and Social Services Emergency Fund (PHSSEF) have greatly assisted physician practices and hospitals in providing treatment for those patients in need, flattening the pandemic curve, and relieving the financial pressures they have faced while serving their communities. But, as you know, the community public health need is still great. Of particular importance is the future of telemedicine. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, these services have become vital in treating patients where they are as the nation embarks on widespread social distancing. Telehealth services allow physicians to extend care to more patients and increase access. This vital method of care should not be limited during a public health emergency. About America’s Physician Groups APG is a national professional association representing over 300 physician groups that employ or contract with approximately 195,000 physicians that provide care to nearly 45 million patients. Our tagline, “Taking Responsibility for America’s Health,” represents our members’ vision to move from the antiquated fee-for-service (FFS) reimbursement system to a value- based system where physician groups are accountable for the cost and quality of care.
  • Ranking Member John Barrasso

    Ranking Member John Barrasso

    Senate Committee Musical Chairs August 15, 2018 Key Retiring Committee Seniority over Sitting Chair/Ranking Member Viewed as Seat Republicans Will Most Likely Retain Viewed as Potentially At Risk Republican Seat Viewed as Republican Seat at Risk Viewed as Seat Democrats Will Most Likely Retain Viewed as Potentially At Risk Democratic Seat Viewed as Democratic Seat at Risk Notes • The Senate Republican leader is not term-limited; Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) will likely remain majority leader. The only member of Senate GOP leadership who is currently term-limited is Republican Whip John Cornyn (R-TX). • Republicans have term limits of six years as chairman and six years as ranking member. Republican members can only use seniority to bump sitting chairs/ranking members when the control of the Senate switches parties. • Committee leadership for the Senate Aging; Agriculture; Appropriations; Banking; Environment and Public Works (EPW); Health Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP); Indian Affairs; Intelligence; Rules; and Veterans Affairs Committees are unlikely to change. Notes • Current Armed Services Committee (SASC) Chairman John McCain (R-AZ) continues to receive treatment for brain cancer in Arizona. Senator James Inhofe (R-OK) has served as acting chairman and is likely to continue to do so in Senator McCain’s absence. If Republicans lose control of the Senate, Senator McCain would lose his top spot on the committee because he already has six years as ranking member. • In the unlikely scenario that Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) does not take over the Finance Committee, Senator Mike Crapo (R-ID), who currently serves as Chairman of the Banking Committee, could take over the Finance Committee.
  • CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present

    CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present

    CHAIRMEN OF SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–present INTRODUCTION The following is a list of chairmen of all standing Senate committees, as well as the chairmen of select and joint committees that were precursors to Senate committees. (Other special and select committees of the twentieth century appear in Table 5-4.) Current standing committees are highlighted in yellow. The names of chairmen were taken from the Congressional Directory from 1816–1991. Four standing committees were founded before 1816. They were the Joint Committee on ENROLLED BILLS (established 1789), the joint Committee on the LIBRARY (established 1806), the Committee to AUDIT AND CONTROL THE CONTINGENT EXPENSES OF THE SENATE (established 1807), and the Committee on ENGROSSED BILLS (established 1810). The names of the chairmen of these committees for the years before 1816 were taken from the Annals of Congress. This list also enumerates the dates of establishment and termination of each committee. These dates were taken from Walter Stubbs, Congressional Committees, 1789–1982: A Checklist (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1985). There were eleven committees for which the dates of existence listed in Congressional Committees, 1789–1982 did not match the dates the committees were listed in the Congressional Directory. The committees are: ENGROSSED BILLS, ENROLLED BILLS, EXAMINE THE SEVERAL BRANCHES OF THE CIVIL SERVICE, Joint Committee on the LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, LIBRARY, PENSIONS, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS, RETRENCHMENT, REVOLUTIONARY CLAIMS, ROADS AND CANALS, and the Select Committee to Revise the RULES of the Senate. For these committees, the dates are listed according to Congressional Committees, 1789– 1982, with a note next to the dates detailing the discrepancy.
  • Judicial Genealogy (And Mythology) of John Roberts: Clerkships from Gray to Brandeis to Friendly to Roberts

    Judicial Genealogy (And Mythology) of John Roberts: Clerkships from Gray to Brandeis to Friendly to Roberts

    The Judicial Genealogy (and Mythology) of John Roberts: Clerkships from Gray to Brandeis to Friendly to Roberts BRAD SNYDER* During his Supreme Court nomination hearings, John Roberts idealized and mythologized the first judge he clerkedfor, Second Circuit Judge Henry Friendly, as the sophisticated judge-as-umpire. Thus far on the Court, Roberts has found it difficult to live up to his Friendly ideal, particularlyin several high-profile cases. This Article addresses the influence of Friendly on Roberts and judges on law clerks by examining the roots of Roberts's distinguishedyet unrecognized lineage of former clerks: Louis Brandeis 's clerkship with Horace Gray, Friendly's clerkship with Brandeis, and Roberts's clerkships with Friendly and Rehnquist. Labeling this lineage a judicial genealogy, this Article reorients clerkship scholarship away from clerks' influences on judges to judges' influences on clerks. It also shows how Brandeis, Friendly, and Roberts were influenced by their clerkship experiences and how they idealized their judges. By laying the clerkship experiences and career paths of Brandeis, Friendly, and Roberts side-by- side in detailed primary source accounts, this Article argues that judicial influence on clerks is more professional than ideological and that the idealization ofjudges and emergence of clerks hips as must-have credentials contribute to a culture ofjudicial supremacy. * Assistant Professor, University of Wisconsin Law School. Thanks to Eleanor Brown, Dan Ernst, David Fontana, Abbe Gluck, Dirk Hartog, Dan
  • April 26, 2021 the Honorable Dick Durbin the Honorable Chuck

    April 26, 2021 the Honorable Dick Durbin the Honorable Chuck

    April 26, 2021 The Honorable Dick Durbin The Honorable Chuck Grassley Chair Ranking Member Senate Judiciary Committee Senate Judiciary Committee 711 Hart Senate Building 135 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 The Honorable Jerrold Nadler The Honorable Jim Jordan Chair Ranking Member House Judiciary Committee House Judiciary Committee 2138 Rayburn Building 2142 Rayburn Building Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20515 The Honorable Sheila Jackson Lee The Honorable Andy Biggs Chair Ranking Member Subcommittee on Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security Security 2138 Rayburn Building 2142 Rayburn Building Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20515 Dear Chair Durbin, Ranking Member Grassley, Chair Nadler, and Ranking Member Jordan: We, the undersigned attorneys general, strongly urge you to pass the EAGLES Act, which reauthorizes and expands the work of the Secret Service’s National Threat Assessment Center (NTAC) to provide research-based threat assessment training. The EAGLES Act was introduced after the mass shooting at the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida and establishes a national program to prevent targeted school violence by facilitating evidence-based collaboration between state and federal agencies. The Act’s safe school initiative contains research and training components, allows dissemination of evidence-based practices, and authorizes NTAC to consult with state and local educational, law enforcement, and mental health officials to develop research and training. It is unfortunate we have to turn to the threat assessment expertise of the Secret Service in order to keep educators and students safe at school, but gun violence in schools has become all too commonplace.
  • Senate Section

    Senate Section

    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 116 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 165 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, MAY 15, 2019 No. 81 Senate The Senate met at 10 a.m. and was EXECUTIVE SESSION truth,’’ I stuck my neck out during the called to order by the President pro Reagan administration. That is when I tempore (Mr. GRASSLEY). learned about the Pentagon’s little EXECUTIVE CALENDAR shop of price horrors. f The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under Of course, ripping off the taxpayers the previous order, the Senate will pro- started during the Revolutionary War, PRAYER ceed to executive session to resume when contractors sold rotten meat to The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- consideration of the following nomina- the Continental Army, and it contin- fered the following prayer: tion, which the clerk will report. ued during the Civil War, when profit- Let us pray. The senior assistant legislative clerk eers sold ammunition filled with saw- Eternal Spirit, our shelter in the read the nomination of Kenneth Kiyul dust and shoddy shoes and horses to time of storm, when our hearts grow Lee, of California, to be United States the Union Army. It looks like it con- faint and weary, renew our strength Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit. tinues to this day. and enable us to soar above our chal- The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Sen- Back in 1985, Americans will recall, lenges. ator from Iowa. the Defense Department was shelling Today, fill our lawmakers with the PENTAGON OVERSIGHT out vast amounts of taxpayer dollars spirit of wisdom.
  • December 3, 2020 the Honorable Mitch Mcconnell the Honorable Chuck Schumer Majority Leader Minority Leader U.S. Senate U

    December 3, 2020 the Honorable Mitch Mcconnell the Honorable Chuck Schumer Majority Leader Minority Leader U.S. Senate U

    December 3, 2020 The Honorable Mitch McConnell The Honorable Chuck Schumer Majority Leader Minority Leader U.S. Senate U.S. Senate S-230 The Capitol S-221 The Capitol Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 The Honorable Chuck Grassley The Honorable Ron Wyden Chairman Ranking Member U.S. Senate Committee on Finance U.S. Senate Committee on Finance 219 Dirksen Senate Office Building 219 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 Dear Leader McConnell, Leader Schumer, Chairman Grassley and Ranking Member Wyden: The Coalition for Energy Efficient Jobs & Investment appreciates your support for previous extensions of the Section 179D energy efficient commercial buildings deduction. With the upcoming expiration of Section 179D on December 31, 2020, we strongly encourage you to make permanent or enact a multi-year extension of Section 179D before the end of this year to ensure that Section 179D will continue to seamlessly be available as an incentive to make energy efficient upgrades in commercial buildings. The Coalition for Energy Efficient Jobs & Investment also stands ready to work with Members of Congress to make Section 179D more robust and broaden its impact. Our Coalition represents a broad spectrum of the U.S. economy, including many small businesses that help drive and sustain American job growth and will play a critical role in helping our economy recover from the COVID-19 pandemic. Members include real estate, manufacturing, architecture, contracting, engineering, building services, financing, labor, education, environmental and energy efficiency advocates. Section 179D incentivizes building owners to leverage billions of dollars in private capital that result in energy efficient upgrades in thousands of commercial and larger multifamily buildings.
  • No Institution Exemplifies Georgetown Law's Ties to the Supreme Court

    No Institution Exemplifies Georgetown Law's Ties to the Supreme Court

    FALL/WINTER 2018 No institution exemplifies Georgetown Law’s ties to the Supreme Court better than our celebrated Supreme Court Institute GEORGETOWN LAW Fall/Winter 2018 ANN W. PARKS, Esq. (G’14, LL.M.’16) Editor BRENT FUTRELL Director of Design INES HILDE Associate Director of Design MIMI KOUMANELIS Executive Director of Communications TANYA WEINBERG Director of Media Relations and Deputy Director of Communications RICHARD SIMON Director of Web Communications JACLYN DIAZ Communications and Social Media Manager BEN PURSE Senior Video Producer JERRY COOPER Communications Associate CONTRIBUTORS Julie Bourbon, Barbara Grzincic, Melanie D.G. Kaplan, Greg Langlois, Sara Piccini, Abby Reecer, Mark Smith, Anna Louie Sussman MATTHEW F. CALISE Director of Alumni Affairs GENE FINN Assistant Dean of Development and Alumni Relations WILLIAM M. TREANOR Dean of the Law Center Executive Vice President, Law Center Affairs Front and back cover photos: Brent Futrell Contact: Editor, Georgetown Law Georgetown University Law Center 600 New Jersey Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 [email protected] Address changes/additions/deletions: 202-687-1994 or e-mail [email protected] Georgetown Law magazine is on the Law Center’s website at www.law.georgetown.edu Copyright © 2018, Georgetown University Law Center. All rights reserved. Orientation 2018 Michelle Wadolowski (L’21) contemplates the Smithsonian National Museum of African American History and Culture. Photo Credit: Brent Futrell 2018 Fall/Winter 1 INSIDENEWS / CONVINCING EVIDENCE / 10 / 14 Four Cases, Three Circuits, Three Weeks A Civil, Civic Conversation Georgetown Law’s Appellate Litigation Clinic is often compared to a Parkland student, Georgetown Law student speak at an O’Neill boutique appellate firm.
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 114 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

    Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 114 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 114 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 161 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 2015 No. 158 House of Representatives The House met at 10 a.m. and was thus driving up America’s deficits and (before the GOP Conference meeting called to order by the Speaker pro tem- driving down America’s ability to pay next week in which we are to conduct pore (Mr. VALADAO). for safety nets for Americans. Speaker elections) a written commu- This week I vote on PAUL RYAN’s bid f nication correcting my errors. for House Speaker. While PAUL RYAN ‘‘If I do not receive such a commu- DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO has excellent communication skills, is nication from you, then I will infer TEMPORE charismatic, understands the economic that you concur that my portrayal of The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- risk of out-of-control deficits, and the your remarks is accurate and that I, fore the House the following commu- like, PAUL RYAN and I have a major and the rest of the GOP Conference, nication from the Speaker: disagreement on border security. and the American people, may rely on Last week, on October 22, PAUL your words as I have written them. WASHINGTON, DC, ‘‘I need your assurance that you will October 27, 2015. RYAN, I, and others met about his can- I hereby appoint the Honorable DAVID G. didacy. Border security was discussed. not use the Speaker’s position to ad- VALADAO to act as Speaker pro tempore on Thereafter, I hand-delivered to PAUL vance your immigration policies, ex- this day.