Fortune 500 Reranking the Fortune 500 Using Darknet Intelligence

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fortune 500 Reranking the Fortune 500 Using Darknet Intelligence The Darknet Index: Fortune 500 Reranking the Fortune 500 using Darknet Intelligence Introduction We live in an era where cybersecurity often dominates the news. Yahoo, Sony and Target are only three of the many companies subjected in recent years to costly cyber attacks. No company or organization is immune from these types of attacks, and billions of dollars are spent annually in an attempt to protect the valuable data they hold. TABLE OF CONTENTS Measuring cybersecurity risk therefore becomes important for any company seeking to implement a comprehensive Introduction ...............................1 cybersecurity strategy and justify a return on the increasing Methodology................................3 investments made. Several different risk measures exist— The Top 25 ...................................5 some financial, performance, or technology related, and others Observations................................6 which attempt to measure the frequency of attacks thwarted. Conclusions..................................8 Each provides one aspect of guidance for management teams in their evaluation of overall risk. The Darknet Index......................9 About Us .....................................22 However, to date, there has been no attempt to measure the cybersecurity risk or profile of companies by how much data is available on a company that can be misused. How does the availability of breached data affect the overall the overall cybersecurity profile of a company? When data is hacked or stolen it often ends up for sale on an area of the internet known as the darknet. The darknet— actually a collection of numerous private networks, forums and channels—allows anyone using special browsers and tools to post data and communicate in a private online world. This facilitates the confidential and anonymous exchange of large amounts of stolen data. OWL CYBERSECURITY OWLCYBER.COM 303-234-1231 OWL CYBERSECURITY DARKNET INDEX: FORTUNE 500 PAGE 2 Unlike the surface web — the internet most of us use every day — there is little indexing of darknet sites. In fact, until now, there has been no easy way to comprehensively measure a company’s presence on the darknet. OWL Cybersecurity has built a proprietary database of darknet content which is the most comprehensive one of its kind in the world. This database is automatically and continuously updated with between 10 to 15 million pages per day, from more than 24,000 domains on the Tor network alone, as well as other darknet networks. Our darknet content is indexed and searchable in 47 languages for organizations wishing to monitor their data on the darknet. To demonstrate how the unprecedented scope and scale of our darknet data can strengthen a cybersecurity program, we used our OWL Vision database, together with additional sources of DARKINT™ — or darknet intelligence — to rerank all members of the Fortune 500 (as of April 2017) based on their darknet footprint. By doing this, we can provide each company with a snapshot view of its exposure on the darknet relative to peers, something we are uniquely positioned to provide. Key Takeaways From Our Analysis • Every Fortune 500 company is exposed. Every single company in the Fortune 500 had a positive Darknet Index score, meaning they have a presence on the darknet. • Amazon leads the Index. The company with the largest darknet footprint is online retailer Amazon, who has a massive internet presence and possesses a significant amount of customer data. • Technology and telecommunications companies overall are the largest target. Technology and telecommunication firms have the highest Darknet Index scores, indicating that they are the most attractive firms targeted by threat actors. • Financial firms perform better than expected. Financial firms—frequent targets of hackers—fare better than expected, likely reflecting their focus on significant investment in cybersecurity in recent years. • Hacked valuable data = increased risk. The highest scoring companies all had credentials and/or intellectual property exposed on the darknet which can be monetized by others. • Vigilance pays off. Investing in cybersecurity has tangible Darknet Index score benefits. Sectors which have invested heavily have, in some cases, smaller darknet footprints and, thus, lower Index ratings. OWL CYBERSECURITY OWLCYBER.COM 303-234-1231 OWL CYBERSECURITY DARKNET INDEX: FORTUNE 500 PAGE 3 Methodology One of the biggest hurdles to widespread awareness of darknet activity is the lack of any reliable indices. Unlike the surface web, on which many organizations continuously capture and record internet activity in a historical archive, the darknet is designed to be difficult to trace. The use of special browsers is required, and users need to obtain the full URL of a destination darknet web page to visit. There is no “darknet Google,” and darknet sites are often put up and taken down within a matter of minutes to maintain anonymity. As a result, the darknet has become a safe harbor for those looking to remain private online, whether their intentions are good or bad. A high volume of criminal activity has migrated to the darknet. “According to our scale, every company on the Fortune 500 has a darknet ranking.” OWL Cybersecurity’s proprietary OWL Vision is an expansive darknet database which can be queried via Boolean logic, proximity search, email domains, and more. Leveraging this, OWL Cybersecurity assessed each company in the 2017 Fortune 500 list, ultimately assigning every company with an overall darknet footprint. Combined with our proprietary hackishness algorithm — which rates darknet postings based on their potential for criminal use — our calculations yielded notable results. To compile our Darknet Index, we ran each member of the 2017 Fortune 500 through the OWL Vision database. We focused on specific darknets for matches on each company’s website and email domains and then further adjusted the results based on computations of “hackishness”— our algorithmic rating system which scores based on the likelihood the data could be used for nefarious intent and/or has been recorded within a recent timeframe. Recent results, from within the last 90 days, were given the most weight, as recent breaches or data leaks containing an organization’s proprietary information often make the target company a target. All mirror sites (which can be otherwise considered duplicate data) of both darknet and surface net results were excluded. OWL CYBERSECURITY OWLCYBER.COM 303-234-1231 OWL CYBERSECURITY DARKNET INDEX: FORTUNE 500 PAGE 4 Algorithm Our hackishness algorithm is the most critical input to these rankings as it eliminates uninteresting content hits. For simplicity, our algorithm weighted results from Tor Hidden Services and transitory sites most heavily. All results found in our database were given some weight as per the formula below: H (ln RDS + ln RTS) = H (ln ATR) 90 ATR H = Hackishness of last 90 days results 90 H = Hackishness of all time breach results ATR RDS = # results from Darknet Sites RTS = # results from Transitory Paste Sites ATR = # results from all time breach results Key Methodological Points • The Index is simple and objective. It is not biased toward company nicknames, press mentions, company size, CEO names or other subjective measures. • The Index scale is logarithmic, meaning every point in the index reflects almost triple the profile of a single point less. • The Index ranking reflects the attractiveness of the target. It is not a “risk of breach”. It is more closely aligned to the attractiveness of the target to a hacker while taking into account the effectiveness of their cyber defenses. • The size of a single breach is less of a factor than the frequency of breaches over the study period. • A company’s ranking as compared with direct competitors is very important. In future reports, we will take a closer look at more specific industry data to see the extent to which industry relates to a company’s DARKINT footprint. OWL CYBERSECURITY OWLCYBER.COM 303-234-1231 OWL CYBERSECURITY DARKNET INDEX: FORTUNE 500 PAGE 5 The OWL Cybersecurity Darknet Index: Top 25 The results of our analysis are presented below for the top 25 companies in our Index as follows. The full ranking of the Fortune 500 companies by their darknet footprint can be found in the Darknet Index section (Page 9). We categorize all companies using the following metrics: • DARKINT Rank - The rank of each company based on their darknet footprint score. • Fortune 500 Rank - The rank each company is given on the annual list. • Darknet Index Score - The darknet footprint score on which the rankings are based. • Company Sector - The market segment as defined by the Fortune 500 list. DARKINT Fortune Darknet Rank 500 Rank Company Name Index Score Company Sector 1 18 Amazon.com 19.16 Technology 2 36 Alphabet (Google) 17.21 Technology 3 3 Apple 15.98 Technology 4 157 Facebook 14.99 Technology 5 300 eBay 14.55 Technology 6 85 American Express 13.33 Financials 7 461 Frontier Communications 13.29 Telecommunications 8 379 Netflix 13.19 Retail 9 219 Texas Instruments 12.99 Technology 10 58 FedEx 12.58 Transportation 11 27 Wells Fargo 12.31 Financials 12 25 Microsoft 12.23 Technology 13 67 American Airlines Group 12.06 Transportation 14 10 AT&T 12.01 Telecommunications 15 37 Comcast 12.01 Telecommunications 16 11 General Electric 12.00 Industrials 17 77 Oracle 11.95 Technology 18 78 Morgan Stanley 11.57 Financials 19 20 HP 11.54 Technology 20 51 Intel 11.31 Technology 21 60 Lockheed Martin 11.30 Aerospace & Defense 22 53 Disney 10.88 Media 23 35 State Farm Insurance Cos. 10.77 Financials 24 71 Best Buy 10.72 Retail 25 75 Honeywell International 10.63 Industrials OWL CYBERSECURITY OWLCYBER.COM 303-234-1231 OWL CYBERSECURITY DARKNET INDEX: FORTUNE 500 PAGE 6 Observations Every company on the Fortune 500 has a darknet ranking. This fact alone offers a glimpse into the sheer vol- ume of information available on the darknet and confirms that no company or organization is without risk on the darknet.
Recommended publications
  • Women Led the Legal Departments of Some of the Best-Performing
    FORTUNE 500 MCCA® LIST OF WOMEN GENERAL COUNSEL AT FORTUNE 500 COMPANIES (continued) MCCA® LIST OF WOMEN GENERAL COUNSEL AT FORTUNE 500 COMPANIES (continued) 2010 2009 Grouped 2010 2009 Grouped Company General Counsel Industry Company General Counsel Industry Rank Rank by Industry Rank Rank by Industry Gap Michelle Banks 162 178 Specialty Retailers E Starbucks Paula Boggs 241 261 Food Services J Goldman Sachs Group Esta Stecher³ 39 40 Commercial Banks F SunGard Data Systems Victoria Silbey 380 435 Information Technology Services A Health Net Angelee Bouchard² 146 165 Healthcare: Insurance and Managed Care I Sunoco Stacy L. Fox¹ 78 41 Petroleum Refining C Holly Denise McWatters 431 420 Petroleum Refining C Thrivent Financial for Lutherans Teresa Rasmussen 342 409 Insurance: Life, Health (Mutual) B Honeywell International Katherine Adams 74 63 Aerospace and Defense R TJX Ann McCauley 119 131 Specialty Retailers E Host Hotels & Resorts Elizabeth Abdoo 492 449 Hotels, Casinos, Resorts N TRW Automotive Holdings Robin Walker-Lee¹ 201 169 Motor Vehicles and Parts K International Paper Maura Abeln-Smith 104 97 Forest and Paper Products P Unisys Nancy Sundheim 452 456 Miscellaneous Z J.C. Penney Janet Dhillon 133 139 General Merchandisers E United Parcel Service Teri Plummer-McClure 43 43 Mail, Package, and Freight Delivery T Kindred Healthcare M. Suzanne Riedman 477 538 Healthcare: Medical Facilities I Valero Energy Kim Bowers 26 10 Petroleum Refining C Liberty Global Elizabeth Markowski 210 257 Telecommunications H VF Candace Cummings 310 335
    [Show full text]
  • Fortune 500® Partners List (As of October 29, 2018) This List Represents Green Power Partners That Also Appear on the Fortune 500® List
    Fortune 500® Partners List (as of October 29, 2018) This list represents Green Power Partners that also appear on the Fortune 500® list. EPA's list of Fortune 500 Partners consists of 76 companies using nearly 26 billion kilowatt-hours (kWh) of green power annually, which is equivalent to the electricity use of nearly 2.4 million average American homes. Partner Name Annual GP % of Organization Providers (listed in Green Green Total Type descending order by Power Power Electricity kWh supplied to Partner) Resources Usage Use* (kWh) 1. Microsoft 4,557,278,000 100% Technology & Sterling Planet°, Enbridge Solar, Wind Corporation Telecom LLC, EDF Renewable Energy, Black Hills Corp., Renewable Choice Energy°, Self-supply 2. Intel Corporation 4,152,034,623 100% Technology & Renewable Choice Energy°, Various Telecom 3Degrees°, Unknown, PNM, Self-supply 3. Google Inc. 2,409,051,735 53% Technology & MidAmerican Energy°, Biogas, Small- (Alphabet) Telecom NextEra Energy Resources°, hydro, Solar, Grand River Dam Authority°, Wind Northern Wasco County PUD, Enel Green Power North America, Exelon Generation, EDF Renewable Energy, Self-supply, Duke Energy, Unknown 4. Apple Inc. 1,650,398,166 107% Technology & Self-supply, 3 Phases Various Telecom Renewables°, Avangrid Renewables°, 3Degrees°, Cypress Creek Renewables, SunPower, Silicon Valley Power°, NC GreenPower°, Austin Energy°, Duke Energy, Sacramento Municipal Utility District°, Partner Name Annual GP % of Organization Providers (listed in Green Green Total Type descending order by Power Power Electricity kWh supplied to Partner) Resources Usage Use* (kWh) Salt River Project°, Carbon Solutions Group°, Homefield Energy, Silicon Valley Clean Energy°, Dynegy°, Xcel Energy°, Memphis Light, Gas and Water°, City of Palo Alto Utilities°, Louisville Gas & Electric Company, Capital Dynamics, Dominion Virginia Power°, Central Electric Cooperative, Huntsville Utilities°, Tampa Electric, Dominion Energy, City of Naperville, Avista Utilities, PNM°, Omaha Public Power District, Pacific Power°, NSTAR 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Enterprise Risk Management in the Oil and Gas Industry: an Analysis of Selected Fortune 500 Oil and Gas Companies’ Reaction in 2009 and 2010 Violet C
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Clute Institute: Journals American Journal of Business Education – First Quarter 2016 Volume 9, Number 1 Enterprise Risk Management In The Oil And Gas Industry: An Analysis Of Selected Fortune 500 Oil And Gas Companies’ Reaction In 2009 And 2010 Violet C. Rogers, Stephen F. Austin State University, USA Jack R. Ethridge, Stephen F. Austin State University, USA ABSTRACT1 In 2009, four of the top ten Fortune 500 companies were classified within the oil and gas industry. Organizations of this size typically have an advanced Enterprise Risk Management system in place to mitigate risk and to achieve their corporations’ objectives. The companies and the article utilize the Enterprise Risk Management Integrated Framework developed by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) as a guide to organize their risk management and reporting. The authors used the framework to analyze reporting years 2009 and 2010 for Fortune 500 oil and gas companies. After gathering and examining information from 2009 and 2010 annual reports, 10-K filings, and proxy statements, the article examines how the selected companies are implementing requirements identified in the previously mentioned publications. Each section examines the companies’ Enterprise Risk Management system, risk appetite, and any other notable information regarding risk management. One observation was the existence or non-existence of a Chief Risk Officer or other Senior Level Manager in charge of risk management. Other observations included identified risks, such as changes in economic, regulatory, and political environments in the different countries where the corporations do business.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Decisions and Shareholder Value: an Analysis of Conocophillips Michael Miller University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Accounting Undergraduate Honors Theses Accounting 5-2012 Strategic decisions and shareholder value: an analysis of ConocoPhillips Michael Miller University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/acctuht Part of the Finance and Financial Management Commons Recommended Citation Miller, Michael, "Strategic decisions and shareholder value: an analysis of ConocoPhillips" (2012). Accounting Undergraduate Honors Theses. 3. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/acctuht/3 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Accounting at ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Accounting Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Strategic Decisions and Shareholder Value: An Analysis of ConocoPhillips By Michael Cameron Miller Advisor: Ms. Susan Bristow An Honors Thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Bachelor of Science in Business Administration in Accounting Sam M. Walton College of Business University of Arkansas Fayetteville, Arkansas May 11, 2012 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fortune 500 Women General Counsel Fifth Time in Six Years,” Apr
    Fortune 500 Women General Counsel Fifth Time in Six Years,” Apr. 16, 2007, at 5. MCCA could not confirm the career path www.timeinc.net/fortune/ for three of the new arrivals on the Fortune continued from page 40 information/presscenter/fortune/ 1000 list through published sources. press_releases/20070416_f500.html. 6. See “Fortune 500 2008: Top Performers— Notes 4. As we went to press, MCCA learned that Most Profitable Companies: Profits” at 1. See Geoff Colvin, “Why the Party’s Over,” Ms. Iglesias was no longer associated with money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/ Fortune, May 5, 2008. Nordstrom as of mid-June 2008. She is fortune500/2008/performers/companies/ 2. The term “Fortune 1000” refers to counted as general counsel in this year’s profits/. companies ranked among Fortune’s 501 to survey because she served in that role 7. See Conor Dougherty, “Deborah Siegel, 1000 companies. through 2007, which is the baseline year General Counsel, Guess, Inc.,” in Who’s Who for determination of this year’s Fortune 3. See Colvin, supra note 1; see also in Law, Los Angeles Business Journal, March 3, 500 companies. “Wal-Mart Unseats Exxon Mobil for Top 2003, at http://findarticles.com/ Spot on Fortune 500 List; Ranks No. 1 for p/articles/mi_m5072/is_9_25/ai_98945800/ pg_5. MCCA® 2007 FORTUNE 501–1000 8. “Fortune 500 2008: ConocoPhillips— Women General Counsel COP,” at money.cnn.com/magazines/ fortune/fortune500/2008/snapshots/ By Industry* 327.html. Number Percentage 9. “Fortune 500 2008: Goldman Sachs Group Electronics, Office Equipment (A) 8 10 – GS,” at money.cnn.com/ Insurance: All (B) 4 5 magazines/fortune/fortune500/2008/snap- shots/10777.html.
    [Show full text]
  • Ford Motor Company: Sustainability
    Copyright 2008. No quotation or citation without attribution. IR/PS CSR Case #08-06 Ford Motor Company: Sustainability By: Sun Mi Ha GRADUATE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND PACIFIC STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Prepared for Professor Peter Gourevitch Edited by Kristen Parks Corporate Social Responsibility Fall 2008 Copyright 2008. No quotation or citation without attribution. 2 Table of Contents Corporate Overview ......................................................................................................... 3 Ford Motor Company...................................................................................................... 3 Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)........................................................................... 4 View of Company ............................................................................................................ 4 View of Consumers.......................................................................................................... 6 Motor Industry and CSR ................................................................................................. 7 Ford Motor Company’s CSR........................................................................................... 9 Climate Change............................................................................................................. 10 Mobility ......................................................................................................................... 12 Road Safety Project..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Survey of Fortune 500 Women & Minority General Counsel
    MCCA’S 13TH ANNUAL WOMEN GENERAL COUNSEL SURVEY MEASURING THE 18 PROGRESSof the NATION’s LEGAL LEADERS MCCA®’S 13TH ANNUAL GENERAL COUNSEL SURVEY by THOMAS THRELKELD FOR MOST AMERICANS IT HAS NOT BEEN THE BEST OF TIMES. UNEMPLOYMENT REmaINS STUBBORNLY HIGH, THE HOUSING maRKET IS BEGINNING TO EMERGE FROM THE DOLDRumS, AND CONSumER CONFIDENCE IS faLLING AGAIN. AMERICANS HAVE BECOME ACCUSTOMED TO RIP-ROARING RECOVERIES FROM RECESSION, BUT THAT DID NOT HAPPEN THIS TIME, ALTHOUGH THE ECONOMY HAS NOT BEEN IN RECESSION SINCE 2009. BuT IF ORDINARY AMERICANS ARE STRUGGLING WITH JOB WORRIES, RISING HEALTHCARE COSTS, AND DANGEROUSLY HIGH LEVELS OF HOUSEHOLD DEBT, THE BIGGEST COMPANIES IN THE UNITED STATES— THE famED FORTUNE 500—HAVE NEVER HAD IT SO GOOD. IN 2011, FORTUNE 500 19 $824.5 billion in earnings—an all-time record, and a 16 percent jump from the previousCOMPAN year.I “Corporate America is ES doing great right now,” Andy Serwer, Fortunegenerated a combined aging editor, said on “CBS This Morning.” He continued: “They’ve really come out of the downturn, doing things right. Walmart, which held the top spot the previous two years, fell to second on the list, with revenues of $447 billion. They’re in good shape. A lot of that has to do with magazine the fact man Exxon Mobil earned $41.1 billion in profits, compared to that they’ve cut back. They’ve cut costs during the downturn, - meaning layoffs quite frankly. That’s why profits are so high.” Walmart’s $15.7 billion. Well, that’s not the only reason.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Fortune 500 List
    2015 Fortune 500 List 3M ARRIS Group Capital One Financial Abbott Laboratories Arrow Electronics Cardinal Health AbbVie Asbury Automotive Group CarMax Advance Auto Parts Ashland Casey's General Stores Advanced Micro Devices Assurant Caterpillar AECOM AT&T CBRE Group AES Autoliv CBS Aetna Automatic Data Processing CDW Aflac AutoNation Celanese AGCO Auto‐Owners Insurance Celgene Agilent Technologies AutoZone Centene AGL Resources Avery Dennison CenterPoint Energy AIG Avis Budget Group CenturyLink Air Products & Chemicals Avnet CH2M Hill AK Steel Holding Avon Products Charles Schwab Alaska Air Group Baker Hughes Charter Communications Alcoa Ball Chesapeake Energy Alleghany Bank of America Chevron Allergan Bank of New York Mellon CHS Alliance Data Systems Barnes & Noble Chubb Allstate Baxter International Cigna Ally Financial BB&T Corp Cisco Systems Altria Group Becton Dickinson Citigroup A‐Mark Precious Metals Bed Bath & Beyond Clorox Amazon Berkshire Hathaway CMS Energy Ameren Best Buy Coca‐Cola American Airlines Group Biogen Coca‐Colla Enterprises American Electric Power BlackRock Cognizant Technology Solutions American Express Blackstone Group Colgate‐Palmolive American Family Insurance Group Boeing Comcast American Financial Group Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Commercial Metals Ameriprise Financial BorgWarner Community Health Systems AmerisourceBergen Boston Scientific Computer Sciences Amgen Bristol‐Myers Squibb ConAgra Foods Amphenol Broadcom ConocoPhillips Anadarko Petroleum Buckeye Partners Consolidated Edison Anixter International C.H. Robinson Worldwide Con‐Way Anthem Cablevision Systems Core‐Mark Holding Apache Caesars Entertainment Corning Apple Calpine Costco Applied Materials Calumet Specialty Products Partners Crown Holdings Aramark Cameron International CST Brands Archer Daniels Midland Campbell Soup CSX 2015 Fortune 500 List Cummins Essendant H.J. Heinz CVS Health Estee Lauder Halliburton D.R.
    [Show full text]
  • NACD Fortune 500 Full Board Members
    NACD Fortune 500 Full Board Members Rank | Company Rank | Company Rank | Company 2 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 101 Tesoro Corp. 176 American Electric Power 4 ConocoPhillips 104 Northrop Grumman Corp. Co., Inc. 5 General Motors Co. 105 DirecTV 180 PPG Industries, Inc. 8 Fannie Mae 107 McDonald's Corp. 183 Dollar General Corp. 14 McKesson Corp. 109 Tech Data Corp. 185 Gap, Inc. 16 JP Morgan Chase & Co. 111 International Paper Co. 186 Duke Energy Corp. 18 CVS Caremark Corp. 115 Alcoa, Inc. 187 Dominion Resources, Inc. 22 UnitedHealth Group, Inc. 116 Northwestern Mutual Life 189 Lear Corp. 26 Wells Fargo & Co. Insurance Co. 192 Anadarko Petroleum Corp. 28 Archer Daniels Midland 117 Raytheon 193 Navistar International Corp. Co. 118 Halliburton Co. 198 Community Health Systems 29 AmerisourceBergen Corp. 121 Massachusetts Mutual Life 200 Texas Instruments, Inc. 35 Home Depot, Inc. Insurance Co., Inc. 209 Consolidated Edison, Inc. 37 Microsoft Corp. 126 Goodyear Tire & Rubber 210 Land O'Lakes, Inc. 40 Pfizer, Inc. Co. 211 Edison International 41 PepsiCo, Inc. 130 CIGNA Corp. 213 Yum! Brands, Inc. 43 State Farm Insurance Cos. 135 Freeport-McMoRan Copper 221 Health Net, Inc. 44 Dell, Inc. & Gold 224 Monsanto Co. 45 WellPoint, Inc. 137 Kimberly-Clark Corp. 227 Starbucks Coffee Co. 46 Caterpillar, Inc. 140 United States Steel 228 eBay, Inc. 47 Dow Chemical Co. Corporation 231 Marsh & McLennan 49 Comcast 141 Baker Hughes, Inc. Companies, LLC 51 Intel Corp. 143 Union Pacific Corp. 232 Devon Energy Corporation 53 Best Buy Co., Inc. 145 Exelon Corp. 233 Office Depot, Inc. 54 Lowe's Cos., Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Fortune 500 Summer Orientation 2013
    Fortune 500 Companies That Recruit with UConn Career Services 3M Corning Incorporated Laboratory Corp. of America ADP Automatic Data Processing CVS Caremark Land O’Lakes AECOM Technology Danaher Corporation Liberty Mutual Insurance Aetna Dell, Inc. Lowe’s AFLAC Dominion Macy’s Alcoa DuPont ManpowerGroup Allstate Eastman Chemical Company Marriott International Altria Group eBay MasterCard Amazon ECOlab McGraw-Hill American Express Eli Lilly and Company McKesson American International Group, Inc. EMC MeadWestvaco Ameriprise Financial Emerson Electric Merck Amgen Estée Lauder Metlife, Inc. Apple, Inc. Expeditors International Microsoft Aramark Facebook Monsanto Assurant FedEx Morgan Stanley AT&T Fidelity Investments Mosaic Automatic Data Processing First Data Corporation Mutual of Omaha Insurance Avaya Frontier Communications Nationwide Avis Budget Group GAP NCR Avon Products, Inc. General Cable New York Life Insurance Co. Baker Hughes General Dynamics Newell Rubbermaid Bank of America General Electric NII Holdings Bank of New York Mellon Corp. General Motors Nike Barnes & Noble Genworth Financial, Inc. NiSource Becton Dickinson Goldman Sachs Northeast Utilities Bed Bath & Beyond GoodYear Tire and Rubber Company Northrop Grumman Corporation Best Buy Google Northwestern Mutual Biogen Idec Graybar Omnicare Boston Scientific Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America Omnicom Group Inc. Bristol-Myers Squibb Harris Corporation Oracle C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. Hartford Financial Services Group Owen-Illinois Inc. Cablevision Systems Corp. Health Management Associates, Inc. Parker Hannifin Corp. Capital One Financial Health Net PepsiCo Cardinal Health Henry Schein, Inc. Peter Kiewit Sons’, Inc. CarMax The Hershey Company PetSmart CBRE Group, Inc. Hess Corporation Pfizer Inc. CBS Hewlett-Packard Development Co. Phillips 66 CDW Home Depot Pitney Bowes CH2M Hill Honeywell International PNC Financial Charter Communications Humana Praxair, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • FORTUNE 500 and FORTUNE 1000 Georgia and Metro Atlanta Rankings 2019
    FORTUNE 500 and FORTUNE 1000 Georgia and Metro Atlanta rankings 2019 Georgia continues to rank among the top states in the U.S. for FORTUNE 500 companies. According to the May 2019 FORTUNE 500 listing, Georgia is home to 18 of the country’s 18 top 500 companies and 30 of the country’s top 1000. Georgia companies in FORTUNE 500 Cities with the most States with the most 30 FORTUNE 500 headquarters FORTUNE 500 headquarters Georgia companies in FORTUNE 1000 # FORTUNE # FORTUNE Rank City 500 HQs Rank State 500 HQs 1 New York, NY 46 1 New York 56 2 Houston, TX 20 16 2 California 54 Atlanta MSA companies 3 Atlanta, GA 14 in FORTUNE 500 3 Texas 49 4 Chicago, IL 12 4 Illinois 36 5 Dallas, TX 10 26 5 Ohio 25 Atlanta MSA companies in FORTUNE 1000 6 San Francisco, CA 8 6 Virginia 21 Cincinnati, OH New Jersey 7 Irving, TX 7 7 20 New to Georgia’s Pennsylvania San Jose, CA FORTUNE 500 in 2019: 8 Florida 19 Graphic Packaging Holding St. Louis, MO Minneapolis, MN 9 Georgia 18 8 6 New to Georgia’s Pittsburgh, PA 10 Minnesota 17 FORTUNE 1000 in 2019: Seattle, WA Michigan BlueLinx Holdings 11 16 Charlotte, NC Massachusetts Milwaukee, WI 12 Connecticut 14 9 Richmond, VA 5 Columbus, OH Boston, MA Source: Metro Atlanta Chamber/Georgia Power analysis of 2019 FORTUNE 500 list; as published in FORTUNE magazine, May 2019. See methodology note on last page. 1 Georgia Power Community & Economic Development – Your Partner In Business © Georgia Power, May 2019 Georgia FORTUNE 500 headquartered firms Metro Atlanta (Revenue in millions) The Home Depot PulteGroup h Revenue:
    [Show full text]
  • Exxonmobil's Fall from the S&P 500 Top
    Tom Sanzillo, IEEFA Director of Finance 1 Kathy Hipple, IEEFA Financial Analyst August 2019 ExxonMobil’s Fall From the S&P 500 Top Ten: A Long Time Coming Not for Decades Has the Oil Major Failed to Be Ranked Among the Top ExxonMobil is no longer in the top-ten list of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, according to S&P’s August 31 report of the standings.1 For most of August, real-time coverage2 of the S&P 500 placed ExxonMobil eleventh and twelfth, removed from the top ten for the first time since the index was launched in 1957, based on available data.3 It will also be the first time since the S&P 500 Index’s launch that there are no oil and gas companies in the top ten.4 Absent a significant turnaround through the end of 2019, it will also be the first time ExxonMobil has fallen from more informal lists of the top ten most valuable companies in the United States in more than 100 years, according to IEEFA research.5 During August, the energy sector, of which ExxonMobil is the leader, claimed last place in the S&P 500 sector performance.6 The sector -- which includes only fossil 1 At the end of each month, S&P publishes an update https://us.spindices.com/indices/equity/sp- 500. The update includes a list of the top ten companies in the index and it is released the last day of the month. 2 slickcharts.com. S&P500 companies by weight. 3 Standard Oil of New Jersey was part of the top ten of the S&P 500 when it was launched in 1957.
    [Show full text]