DOCSLIB.ORG

2012 Tour of Anchorage Final Standings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2012 Tour of Anchorage Final Standings 2012 Tour of Anchorage - Final GC after Stage 5 Sheryl Loan wins her record ninth Tour of Anchorage! Overall Place Bib Deficit Time Beginner Men 1 318 Clinton Hodges III Beginner Men 3:41:03 2 327 Norm Sharp Beginner Men 3:41:08 0:00:05 3 319 Peter Malecha Beginner Men 3:41:41 0:00:38 4 320 Tom Schultz Beginner Men 3:48:14 0:07:11 5 325 Eric Anderson Beginner Men 3:48:28 0:07:25 6 302 Michael Fischetti Alaska Velo Sport Beginner Men 3:49:51 0:08:48 7 313 John Lynn Beginner Men 3:50:39 0:09:37 8 364 Steve Kiefer Beginner Men 3:54:05 0:13:02 9 396 Charles Lowell Kaladi-Subway Beginner Men 3:58:09 0:17:06 10 316 Vispi Mistry Beginner Men 4:09:54 0:28:52 11 2 Gunnar Knapp Beginner Men 4:13:46 0:32:43 12 307 Ryan McLaughlin Beginner Men 4:19:00 0:37:57 13 311 Andrew Block Beginner Men 4:25:13 0:44:10 14 305 Gregory Lemons Beginner Men 4:32:33 0:51:30 15 335 Jonathan Woodman Beginner Men 4:41:06 1:00:03 NGC 396 Charles Lowell Kaladi-Subway Beginner Men NGC NGC NGC 338 Keenan Brownsberger Beginner Men NGC NGC NGC 308 Tim Thornleg Beginner Men NGC NGC NGC 329 Daniel McCarthy Beginner Men NGC NGC NGC 333 Mike Shiffer Beginner Men NGC NGC NGC 331 Ben Applegate Beginner Men NGC NGC NGC 304 Jeffrey Campbell Beginner Men NGC NGC NGC 322 Marvin Colbert Speedway Cycles Beginner Men NGC NGC NGC 314 Andrew Cunningham Beginner Men NGC NGC NGC 310 Karl Krenz Beginner Men NGC NGC NGC 303 Peter Mejia Beginner Men NGC NGC NGC 337 Patrick Murray Beginner Men NGC NGC NGC 328 Brett Shepard Beginner Men NGC NGC NGC 330 David Stamp Beginner Men NGC NGC Beginner Women 1 306 Heather Hogge Alaska Bicycle Center Beginner Women 3:45:16 2 324 Rebecca Buchanan Beginner Women 3:45:20 0:00:04 3 321 Kelsey Tranel Beginner Women 3:46:12 0:00:56 4 301 Alice Knapp Beginner Women 3:47:30 0:02:14 5 309 Holly Krenz Beginner Women 4:31:34 0:46:17 6 312 Tara Kulin Alaska Tri Club Beginner Women 4:40:35 0:55:19 NGC 334 Anna Fischer Beginner Women NGC NGC NGC 339 Meredyth Richards Beginner Women NGC NGC NGC 336 Pam Winders Beginner Women NGC NGC NGC 332 Andrea Kettler Beginner Women NGC NGC Expert Men 1 13 Daniel Folmar Kaladi-Subway Expert Men 5:13:52 2 16 Jason Lamoreaux Alaska Tri Club Expert Men 5:16:20 0:02:28 3 9 John Sindell Other Expert Men 5:16:36 0:02:44 4 15 James Stull Kaladi-Subway Expert Men 5:17:07 0:03:16 NGC 4 Justin Nash Kaladi-Subway Expert Men NGC NGC NGC 10 Will Ross Kaladi-Subway Expert Men NGC NGC NGC 11 Mackie Derrick Expert Men NGC NGC NGC 25 Jamie Haines Kaladi-Subway Expert Men NGC NGC NGC 6 Alex Kubitz Expert Men NGC NGC NGC 14 Dashiell Feierabend Expert Men NGC NGC Expert Women 1 12 Sheryl Loan Kaladi-Subway Expert Women 4:45:10 2 22 Jenna App Kaladi-Subway Expert Women 4:47:09 0:01:59 3 27 Lori Deschamps Expert Women 4:47:27 0:02:16 4 17 Maddy Boutet Kaladi-Subway Expert Women 4:50:28 0:05:18 5 21 Kinsey Loan Kaladi-Subway Expert Women 4:51:38 0:06:28 NGC 5 Kelly Powers Expert Women NGC NGC NGC 7 Amber Stull Kaladi-Subway Expert Women NGC NGC Junior Boys 1 397 Simon Lynn Junior Boys 3:03:46 2 326 Joseph Anderson Junior Boys 3:03:50 0:00:04 3 398 Ethan Lynn Junior Boys 3:15:29 0:11:43 NGC 394 Max Beiergrohslein Speedway Cycles Junior Boys NGC NGC NGC 323 Luke Button Other Junior Boys NGC NGC Junior Girls 1 380 Zoe Xavier Kaladi-Subway Junior Girls 2:50:50 NGC 399 Mimi Allen Junior Girls NGC NGC NGC 400 Cadance Stull Junior Girls NGC NGC NGC 395 Kendal Williams Junior Girls NGC NGC Master Men(40+) 1 115 Jens Beck PIP Sport Master Men(40+) 4:43:12 2 105 Richard Tilton Kaladi-Subway Master Men(40+) 4:43:21 0:00:09 3 147 Andrew Duenow Alaska Tri Club Master Men(40+) 4:44:55 0:01:43 4 101 Tony Turrini Kaladi-Subway Master Men(40+) 4:45:14 0:02:03 5 128 Jim Anderson Kaladi-Subway Master Men(40+) 4:45:50 0:02:38 6 121 Tom Peichel Kaladi-Subway Master Men(40+) 4:46:20 0:03:08 7 102 Mike Vania PIP Sport Master Men(40+) 4:47:10 0:03:58 8 132 Tony Brugliera Kaladi-Subway Master Men(40+) 4:47:14 0:04:03 9 116 Jim Winegarner Kaladi-Subway Master Men(40+) 4:48:06 0:04:54 10 122 Charles (Casey) Colton Other Master Men(40+) 4:48:09 0:04:57 11 124 Jim Button Other Master Men(40+) 4:48:19 0:05:07 12 114 Joe Pollock PIP Sport Master Men(40+) 4:52:06 0:08:54 13 107 Fred West Alaska Tri Club Master Men(40+) 4:53:52 0:10:40 14 110 Richard Quinn Backcountry Master Men(40+) 4:54:44 0:11:32 Endurance 15 119 Manx Quayle Other Master Men(40+) 4:57:17 0:14:05 16 120 Ed Sniffen Master Men(40+) 5:01:26 0:18:14 17 123 Christopher Knott Other Master Men(40+) 5:05:07 0:21:55 18 1 Jeffrey Thurston Master Men(40+) 5:17:16 0:34:04 19 108 Tol Fishburn Master Men(40+) 5:23:04 0:39:52 20 169 Bill Fleming Kaladi-Subway Master Men(40+) 5:42:56 0:59:44 NGC 106 Sean Bujold Other Master Men(40+) NGC NGC NGC 221 Darin Marin Master Men(40+) NGC NGC NGC 133 Greg McDuffie Master Men(40+) NGC NGC Master Men(55+) 1 104 Michael McCann Other Master Men(55+) 3:13:46 2 127 Charles Gilbert Master Men(55+) 3:24:37 0:10:51 3 103 Bill Curtis Master Men(55+) 3:31:22 0:17:36 4 112 Peter Maassen Master Men(55+) 3:49:12 0:35:27 5 117 Jim Kubitz Master Men(55+) 3:51:55 0:38:09 NGC 136 Jack Anderson Master Men(55+) NGC NGC NGC 130 Tom Corbin Master Men(55+) NGC NGC NGC 135 Robert Eastaugh Master Men(55+) NGC NGC Master Women(40+) 1 113 Melinda Greig Walker Master Women(40+) 3:57:02 2 118 Stacey Kolstad Master Women(40+) 3:57:29 0:00:27 3 131 Stacy Steinberg Master Women(40+) 3:58:21 0:01:20 4 138 Janus Reyes Alaska Tri Club Master Women(40+) 4:02:37 0:05:36 NGC 141 Karen Morrison Alaska Velo Sport Master Women(40+) NGC NGC Master Women(55+) Backcountry 1 149 Maggie Fitzgerald Master Women(55+) 3:07:05 Endurance 2 177 Pam Cassidy Master Women(55+) 3:15:36 0:08:30 3 109 Lesley Yamauchi Master Women(55+) 3:18:53 0:11:48 4 126 Diane Mohwinkel Master Women(55+) 3:40:51 0:33:46 5 152 Barbara Wong Master Women(55+) 3:41:15 0:34:10 Sport Men 1 219 Bartlomiej Filipowicz Sport Men 4:38:17 2 204 Jacob Wahry Sport Men 4:38:36 0:00:19 3 209 Doug Schutte Team BeerRun Sport Men 4:43:35 0:05:18 4 210 Erik Ostberg Team BeerRun Sport Men 4:44:45 0:06:28 5 3 Alex De'ath Sport Men 4:54:04 0:15:48 6 202 Dylan Fox Sport Men 4:56:41 0:18:25 7 215 Skyler Frank Sport Men 4:58:11 0:19:54 8 207 Jason Hartz Other Sport Men 4:58:13 0:19:57 9 212 Aaron Morrison Alaska Tri Club Sport Men 4:58:18 0:20:02 10 211 Craig Walker Sport Men 4:59:04 0:20:48 11 222 Mike Hancock Speedway Cycles Sport Men 5:00:27 0:22:10 12 214 Markus Doerry Sport Men 5:00:31 0:22:14 13 213 Trevor Jones Sport Men 5:02:48 0:24:31 14 224 Johnny Kay Kaladi-Subway Sport Men 5:12:42 0:34:25 15 206 Jonny Hammond Sport Men 5:26:41 0:48:24 16 205 Peter Jones Speedway Cycles Sport Men 5:34:44 0:56:28 NGC 220 Mick Bakker Sport Men NGC NGC NGC 201 Mike Beiergrohslein Speedway Cycles Sport Men NGC NGC NGC 208 Connor Scher Other Sport Men NGC NGC NGC 216 David Cadogan Sport Men NGC NGC Backcountry NGC 203 Yrjo Roovers Sport Men NGC NGC Endurance Sport Women 1 218 Tracy Morrison Alaska Tri Club Sport Women 3:59:47 2 217 Christina Grande Sport Women 4:04:37 0:04:50 NGC 223 Jenny Kimball Alaska Tri Club Sport Women NGC NGC NGC 125 Nancy Meade-Miller Sport Women NGC NGC .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CO Multi-Line Imaging of Nearby Galaxies (COMING) IV. Overview Of
    Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan (2018) 00(0), 1–33 1 doi: 10.1093/pasj/xxx000 CO Multi-line Imaging of Nearby Galaxies (COMING) IV. Overview of the Project Kazuo SORAI1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Nario KUNO4, 5, Kazuyuki MURAOKA6, Yusuke MIYAMOTO7, 8, Hiroyuki KANEKO7, Hiroyuki NAKANISHI9 , Naomasa NAKAI4, 5, 10, Kazuki YANAGITANI6 , Takahiro TANAKA4, Yuya SATO4, Dragan SALAK10, Michiko UMEI2 , Kana MOROKUMA-MATSUI7, 8, 11, 12, Naoko MATSUMOTO13, 14, Saeko UENO9, Hsi-An PAN15, Yuto NOMA10, Tsutomu, T. TAKEUCHI16 , Moe YODA16, Mayu KURODA6, Atsushi YASUDA4 , Yoshiyuki YAJIMA2 , Nagisa OI17, Shugo SHIBATA2, Masumichi SETA10, Yoshimasa WATANABE4, 5, 18, Shoichiro KITA4, Ryusei KOMATSUZAKI4 , Ayumi KAJIKAWA2, 3, Yu YASHIMA2, 3, Suchetha COORAY16 , Hiroyuki BAJI6 , Yoko SEGAWA2 , Takami TASHIRO2 , Miho TAKEDA6, Nozomi KISHIDA2 , Takuya HATAKEYAMA4 , Yuto TOMIYASU4 and Chey SAITA9 1Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Kita 10 Nishi 8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan 2Department of Cosmosciences, Graduate School of Science, Hokkaido University, Kita 10 Nishi 8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan 3Department of Physics, School of Science, Hokkaido University, Kita 10 Nishi 8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan 4Division of Physics, Faculty of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8571, Japan 5Tomonaga Center for the History of the Universe (TCHoU), University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8571, Japan 6Department of Physical Science, Osaka Prefecture University, Gakuen 1-1,
    [Show full text]
  • Sunday October 19, 2014
    Sunday October 19, 2014 Decided to use the Little Thompson Observatory’s telescopes tonight. I couldn’t connect to the 24”. Had connection failure issues. So I used the 18” f/14.2 and the 6” f/6 telescopes tonight. The 40mm eyepiece in 18” is 162x. The 22mm eyepiece in 6” is 41.5x. 7:00 PM. 68 degrees. Sky is clear. Wind is calm. Getting dark. Seeing and transparency Good. NGC 6929 7:27 PM 162x – Under a dim field star is this lopsided, faint, tiny oval glow. Glow goes to 2 o’clock from this star a tiny bit. Glow uniformly lit. NGC 6852 7:32 PM 162x – A brighter white star with very faint circular halo glow around it. With O3 see the halo a bit better and brighter. Star still prominent. NGC 6843 7:35 PM 162x – 7 very dim stars form this asterism in a small, rough circular pattern. NGC 6858 7:37 PM 162x – An asterism of 9 very dim stars in a diamond shape. NGC 6773 7:39 PM 162x – 5 stars form a box of 3 magnitudes with brightest still dim. PK 38-25.1 7:45 PM 162x – A stellar PN. A brighter white star. With O3, see a tiny bit of halo around it. It is small and hard to see. Looks like an out of focus star. Pal 11 7:49 PM 162x – With AV and waiting, see 3-4 very faint stars once in a while. In between a nice asterism pattern where picture shows it should be and where these 3-4 stars pop in.
    [Show full text]
  • Expected Differences Between AGB Stars in the LMC and the SMC Due to Differences in Chemical Composition
    New Views of the Magellanic Clouds fA U Symposium, Vol. 190, 1999 Y.-H. Chu, N.B. Suntzef], J.E. Hesser, and D.A. Bohlender, eds. Expected Differences between AGB Stars in the LMC and the SMC Due to Differences in Chemical Composition Ju. Frantsman Astronomical Institute, Latvian University, Raina Blvd. 19, Riga, LV-1586, LATVIA Abstract. Certain aspects of the AGB population, such as the relative number of M and N stars, the mass loss rates, and the initial masses of carbon- oxygen cores, depend on the initial heavy element abundance Z. I have calculated synthetic populations of AGB stars for different initial Z values taking into consideration the evolution of single and close binary stars. I present the results of population syntheses of AGB stars in clusters as a function of different initial chemical compositions. The relation for the tip luminosity of AGB stars versus cluster age as a function of Z is presented and is used to determine the ages for a number of clusters in the LMC and the SMC, including clusters with no previous age determinations. Population simulations show that for low heavy element abundance (Z = 0.001) few M stars are formed with respect to the number of carbon stars. However, the total number of all AGB stars in clusters is not affected by the initial chemical composition. As a result of the evolution of close binary components after the mass exchange, an increase in the range of limiting values of the thermal pulsing AGB star luminosities is expected. The difference between the maximum luminosity on the AGB of single star and the luminosity of a star after a mass exchange event in a close binary system may be as great as 1 magnitude for very young clusters.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy Magazine Special Issue
    γ ι ζ γ δ α κ β κ ε γ β ρ ε ζ υ α φ ψ ω χ α π χ φ γ ω ο ι δ κ α ξ υ λ τ μ β α σ θ ε β σ δ γ ψ λ ω σ η ν θ Aι must-have for all stargazers η δ μ NEW EDITION! ζ λ β ε η κ NGC 6664 NGC 6539 ε τ μ NGC 6712 α υ δ ζ M26 ν NGC 6649 ψ Struve 2325 ζ ξ ATLAS χ α NGC 6604 ξ ο ν ν SCUTUM M16 of the γ SERP β NGC 6605 γ V450 ξ η υ η NGC 6645 M17 φ θ M18 ζ ρ ρ1 π Barnard 92 ο χ σ M25 M24 STARS M23 ν β κ All-in-one introduction ALL NEW MAPS WITH: to the night sky 42,000 more stars (87,000 plotted down to magnitude 8.5) AND 150+ more deep-sky objects (more than 1,200 total) The Eagle Nebula (M16) combines a dark nebula and a star cluster. In 100+ this intense region of star formation, “pillars” form at the boundaries spectacular between hot and cold gas. You’ll find this object on Map 14, a celestial portion of which lies above. photos PLUS: How to observe star clusters, nebulae, and galaxies AS2-CV0610.indd 1 6/10/10 4:17 PM NEW EDITION! AtlAs Tour the night sky of the The staff of Astronomy magazine decided to This atlas presents produce its first star atlas in 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • A Basic Requirement for Studying the Heavens Is Determining Where In
    Abasic requirement for studying the heavens is determining where in the sky things are. To specify sky positions, astronomers have developed several coordinate systems. Each uses a coordinate grid projected on to the celestial sphere, in analogy to the geographic coordinate system used on the surface of the Earth. The coordinate systems differ only in their choice of the fundamental plane, which divides the sky into two equal hemispheres along a great circle (the fundamental plane of the geographic system is the Earth's equator) . Each coordinate system is named for its choice of fundamental plane. The equatorial coordinate system is probably the most widely used celestial coordinate system. It is also the one most closely related to the geographic coordinate system, because they use the same fun­ damental plane and the same poles. The projection of the Earth's equator onto the celestial sphere is called the celestial equator. Similarly, projecting the geographic poles on to the celest ial sphere defines the north and south celestial poles. However, there is an important difference between the equatorial and geographic coordinate systems: the geographic system is fixed to the Earth; it rotates as the Earth does . The equatorial system is fixed to the stars, so it appears to rotate across the sky with the stars, but of course it's really the Earth rotating under the fixed sky. The latitudinal (latitude-like) angle of the equatorial system is called declination (Dec for short) . It measures the angle of an object above or below the celestial equator. The longitud inal angle is called the right ascension (RA for short).
    [Show full text]
  • The HST Key Project on the Extragalactic Distance Scale XIV
    c The HST Key Project on the Extragalactic Distance Scale XIV. The Cepheids in NGC 1365' N. A. Silbermann,2 Paul Laura Ferrare~e,~Peter B. Stetson,5Barry F. Madore,' Robert C. Kennicutt, Jr.,3 Wendy L. ,Freedman,7.Jeremy R. i\/lould,' Fabio Bre~olin,~ HollandBrad E;. Gibson,' John A. Graham,"Mingsheng Han," John G. 'Based on observations with the NASA/ESA HubbleSpace Telescope obtained at the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by AURA, Inc. under NASA Contract No. NAS5-265.55. 21nfrared Processing and Analysis Center, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, MS 100-22, Pasadena, CA 91125 3Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, A2 85721 4Hubble Fellow, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 5Dominion Astrophysical Observatory, Victoria, British Columbia V8X 4M6 Canada 'NASA ExtragalacticDatabase, Infrared Processing and A4nalysis Center, California Institute of Technology, MS 100-22, Pasadena, CA 91125 70bservatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, Pa,sadena CA 91101 'Mount Stromlo and Siding Spring Observatories, Institute of Advanced Studies, ANU, ACT 2611 Australia 'Johns Hopkins University and Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD 21218 "Dept. of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institution of \Va.shington, Washington D.C. 20015 "University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 -- .j ~ ABSTRACT We report the detection of Clepheicl variable stars in the barred spiral galaxy NGC 1365, located in the Fornax cluster, using the Hubble Space Telescope Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2. Twelve V (F555W) and four I (F814W) epochs of observation were obtained. The two photometry packages, ALLFRAME and DoPHOT, were separately used to obtain profile-fitting photometry of all the stars in the HST field.
    [Show full text]
  • And Ecclesiastical Cosmology
    GSJ: VOLUME 6, ISSUE 3, MARCH 2018 101 GSJ: Volume 6, Issue 3, March 2018, Online: ISSN 2320-9186 www.globalscientificjournal.com DEMOLITION HUBBLE'S LAW, BIG BANG THE BASIS OF "MODERN" AND ECCLESIASTICAL COSMOLOGY Author: Weitter Duckss (Slavko Sedic) Zadar Croatia Pусскй Croatian „If two objects are represented by ball bearings and space-time by the stretching of a rubber sheet, the Doppler effect is caused by the rolling of ball bearings over the rubber sheet in order to achieve a particular motion. A cosmological red shift occurs when ball bearings get stuck on the sheet, which is stretched.“ Wikipedia OK, let's check that on our local group of galaxies (the table from my article „Where did the blue spectral shift inside the universe come from?“) galaxies, local groups Redshift km/s Blueshift km/s Sextans B (4.44 ± 0.23 Mly) 300 ± 0 Sextans A 324 ± 2 NGC 3109 403 ± 1 Tucana Dwarf 130 ± ? Leo I 285 ± 2 NGC 6822 -57 ± 2 Andromeda Galaxy -301 ± 1 Leo II (about 690,000 ly) 79 ± 1 Phoenix Dwarf 60 ± 30 SagDIG -79 ± 1 Aquarius Dwarf -141 ± 2 Wolf–Lundmark–Melotte -122 ± 2 Pisces Dwarf -287 ± 0 Antlia Dwarf 362 ± 0 Leo A 0.000067 (z) Pegasus Dwarf Spheroidal -354 ± 3 IC 10 -348 ± 1 NGC 185 -202 ± 3 Canes Venatici I ~ 31 GSJ© 2018 www.globalscientificjournal.com GSJ: VOLUME 6, ISSUE 3, MARCH 2018 102 Andromeda III -351 ± 9 Andromeda II -188 ± 3 Triangulum Galaxy -179 ± 3 Messier 110 -241 ± 3 NGC 147 (2.53 ± 0.11 Mly) -193 ± 3 Small Magellanic Cloud 0.000527 Large Magellanic Cloud - - M32 -200 ± 6 NGC 205 -241 ± 3 IC 1613 -234 ± 1 Carina Dwarf 230 ± 60 Sextans Dwarf 224 ± 2 Ursa Minor Dwarf (200 ± 30 kly) -247 ± 1 Draco Dwarf -292 ± 21 Cassiopeia Dwarf -307 ± 2 Ursa Major II Dwarf - 116 Leo IV 130 Leo V ( 585 kly) 173 Leo T -60 Bootes II -120 Pegasus Dwarf -183 ± 0 Sculptor Dwarf 110 ± 1 Etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Publications OFTHK Astronomical Socik-N-Οκτπκ Pacific 101: 570-572, June 1989
    Publications OFTHK Astronomical SociK-n-οκτπκ Pacific 101: 570-572, June 1989 A SURVEY FOR RR LYRAE VARIABLES IN FIVE SMALL MAGELLANIC CLOUD CLUSTERS ALISTAIR R. WALKER Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory, National Optical Astronomy Observatories* Casilla 603, La Serena, Chile Received 1989 March 15 ABSTRACT Results are presented of a search for RR Lyrae variables in the SMC clusters NGC 121, Lindsay 1, Kron 3, Kron 7, and Kron 44. The techniques used rediscovered the four RR Lyraes in NGC 121, but no variables were found in the other clusters. It is concluded that RR Lyraes do not occur in SMC clusters younger than — 11 Gyr. Key words: star clusters-Magellanic Clouds-variable stars: RR Lyrae stars 1. Introduction Lindsay 1 but did not find any variables; however, the The Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) contains a number majority of his plates were exposed in times of rather poor of populous clusters in the age range 3-12 Gyr, unlike seeing. A survey of several MC clusters for RR Lyraes was either the Galaxy or the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). made, using the Yale 1-m telescope and an image-tube Olszewski (1986) and Olszewski, Schommer, and camera, by Graham and Nemec (1984). They found many Aaronson (1987, henceforth OSA) point out that it should variables in old LMC clusters but none in the two SMC be possible to determine the age of the youngest cluster clusters blinked, NGC 339 and NGC 416. RR Lyraes by a suitable survey for the variables in the Since these surveys, color-magnitude diagrams candidate clusters.
    [Show full text]
  • SCYON Issue 77
    edited by Giovanni Carraro, Martin Netopil, and Ernst Paunzen https://www.univie.ac.at/scyon/ email: [email protected] The official Newsletter of the IAU Commission H4. SCYON Issue No. 77 September 30th, 2018 Dear Colleagues, This editorial is dedicated to an announcement by Amanda Karakas, the new President of the IAU Commission H4, which you can find on the next page. The current SCYON issue includes numerous paper abstracts, which cover a broad range in star cluster research. We also want to congratulate Maria Tiongco, who recently finished her PhD at the Indiana University. We wish her all the best for the future career! Furthermore, save the date for an upcoming conference in Bologna and register for one which takes place soon in Heidelberg. The SCYON editor team: Giovanni Carraro, Martin Netopil, and Ernst Paunzen CONTENTS About the Newsletter Abstracts of refereed papers . 3 SCYON publishes abstracts from any Star Forming Regions ..................3 area in astronomy, which are relevant to Galactic Open Clusters .................5 research on star clusters. We welcome all Galactic Globular Clusters .............8 kinds of submitted contributions (abstracts Clusters in the Magellanic clouds .......9 of refereed papers or conference proceedings, The most distant clusters .............11 PhD summaries, and general announcements Dynamical evolution - Simulations . 13 of e.g. conferences, databases, tools, etc.) Miscellaneous .........................16 Proceedings abstracts ....................17 The mission of this newsletter is to help Ph.D. (dissertation) summaries ...........18 all the researchers in the field with a quick Conferences and Announcements .........19 and efficient link to the scientific activity in the field. We encourage everybody to contribute to the new releases! New abstracts can be submitted at any time using the webform on the SCYON homepage.
    [Show full text]
  • Star Clusters in Local Group Galaxies 3
    Massive Stellar Clusters ASP Conference Series, Vol. XX, 2000 A. Lan¸con & C. Boily, eds. Star Clusters in Local Group Galaxies – Impact of Environment on Their Evolution and Survival Eva K. Grebel1,2 1University of Washington, Department of Astronomy, Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195, USA 2Hubble Fellow Abstract. Star clusters are found in ∼40% of the Local Group galax- ies. Their properties are reviewed. The impact of galaxy environment on the evolution and survival of star clusters is discussed. Possible evi- dence for cluster formation triggered by galaxy interactions, gradients in cluster size, metallicity and stellar content with galactocentric radius and variations as a function of galaxy type are briefly summarized. 1. Introduction Star clusters in Local Group galaxies comprise a wide range of roughly coeval stellar agglomerates ranging from globular clusters to associations, from very metal-poor objects to clusters with solar and higher metallicity, and from ancient populations to embedded young clusters. Three basic types of such clusterings are observed: globular clusters, open clusters, and associations. 1.1. Globular Clusters Globular clusters are centrally concentrated, spherical systems with masses of 4.2 ∼< log M[M⊙] ∼< 6.6 and tidal radii ranging from ∼ 10 to ∼ 100 pc. They are bound, long-lived (∼>10 Gyr) objects whose lifetimes may extend to a Hubble arXiv:astro-ph/9912529v2 30 Dec 1999 time or beyond, though due to various efficient destruction mechanisms the presently observed globulars are likely just a lower limit of the initial number of globular clusters. Globular clusters have been observed in all known types of galaxies, but many of the less massive galaxies do not contain globular clusters.
    [Show full text]
  • 7.5 X 11.5.Threelines.P65
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-19267-5 - Observing and Cataloguing Nebulae and Star Clusters: From Herschel to Dreyer’s New General Catalogue Wolfgang Steinicke Index More information Name index The dates of birth and death, if available, for all 545 people (astronomers, telescope makers etc.) listed here are given. The data are mainly taken from the standard work Biographischer Index der Astronomie (Dick, Brüggenthies 2005). Some information has been added by the author (this especially concerns living twentieth-century astronomers). Members of the families of Dreyer, Lord Rosse and other astronomers (as mentioned in the text) are not listed. For obituaries see the references; compare also the compilations presented by Newcomb–Engelmann (Kempf 1911), Mädler (1873), Bode (1813) and Rudolf Wolf (1890). Markings: bold = portrait; underline = short biography. Abbe, Cleveland (1838–1916), 222–23, As-Sufi, Abd-al-Rahman (903–986), 164, 183, 229, 256, 271, 295, 338–42, 466 15–16, 167, 441–42, 446, 449–50, 455, 344, 346, 348, 360, 364, 367, 369, 393, Abell, George Ogden (1927–1983), 47, 475, 516 395, 395, 396–404, 406, 410, 415, 248 Austin, Edward P. (1843–1906), 6, 82, 423–24, 436, 441, 446, 448, 450, 455, Abbott, Francis Preserved (1799–1883), 335, 337, 446, 450 458–59, 461–63, 470, 477, 481, 483, 517–19 Auwers, Georg Friedrich Julius Arthur v. 505–11, 513–14, 517, 520, 526, 533, Abney, William (1843–1920), 360 (1838–1915), 7, 10, 12, 14–15, 26–27, 540–42, 548–61 Adams, John Couch (1819–1892), 122, 47, 50–51, 61, 65, 68–69, 88, 92–93,
    [Show full text]
  • (Ap) Mag Size Distance Rise Transit Set Gal NGC 6217 Arp 185 Umi
    Herschel 400 Observing List, evening of 2015 Oct 15 at Cleveland, Ohio Sunset 17:49, Twilight ends 19:18, Twilight begins 05:07, Sunrise 06:36, Moon rise 09:51, Moon set 19:35 Completely dark from 19:35 to 05:07. Waxing Crescent Moon. All times local (EST). Listing All Classes visible above the perfect horizon and in twilight or moonlight before 23:59. Cls Primary ID Alternate ID Con RA (Ap) Dec (Ap) Mag Size Distance Rise Transit Set Gal NGC 6217 Arp 185 UMi 16h31m48.9s +78°10'18" 11.9 2.6'x 2.1' - 15:22 - Gal NGC 2655 Arp 225 Cam 08h57m35.6s +78°09'22" 11 4.5'x 2.8' - 7:46 - Gal NGC 3147 MCG 12-10-25 Dra 10h18m08.0s +73°19'01" 11.3 4.1'x 3.5' - 9:06 - PNe NGC 40 PN G120.0+09.8 Cep 00h13m59.3s +72°36'43" 10.7 1.0' 3700 ly - 23:03 - Gal NGC 2985 MCG 12-10-6 UMa 09h51m42.0s +72°12'01" 11.2 3.8'x 3.1' - 8:39 - Gal Cigar Galaxy M 82 UMa 09h57m06.5s +69°35'59" 9 9.3'x 4.4' 12.0 Mly - 8:45 - Gal NGC 1961 Arp 184 Cam 05h43m51.6s +69°22'44" 11.8 4.1'x 2.9' 180.0 Mly - 4:32 - Gal NGC 2787 MCG 12-9-39 UMa 09h20m40.5s +69°07'51" 11.6 3.2'x 1.8' - 8:09 - Gal NGC 3077 MCG 12-10-17 UMa 10h04m31.3s +68°39'09" 10.6 5.1'x 4.2' 12.0 Mly - 8:52 - Gal NGC 2976 MCG 11-12-25 UMa 09h48m29.2s +67°50'21" 10.8 6.0'x 3.1' 15.0 Mly - 8:36 - PNe Cat's Eye Nebula NGC 6543 Dra 17h58m31.7s +66°38'25" 8.3 22" 4400 ly - 16:49 - Open NGC 7142 Collinder 442 Cep 21h45m34.2s +65°51'16" 10 12.0' 5500 ly - 20:35 - Gal NGC 2403 MCG 11-10-7 Cam 07h38m20.9s +65°33'36" 8.8 20.0'x 10.0' 11.0 Mly - 6:26 - Open NGC 637 Collinder 17 Cas 01h44m15.4s +64°07'07" 7.3 3.0' 7000 ly - 0:33
    [Show full text]