<<

Published OnlineFirst September 19, 2017; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0054

Cancer Meeting Report Research

New Advances and Challenges of Targeting Cancer Stem Cells Nurmaa K. Dashzeveg1, Rokana Taftaf1, Erika K. Ramos1, Luke Torre-Healy2, Anastasia Chumakova2, Daniel J. Silver2, Tyler J. Alban2, Maksim Sinyuk2, Praveena S. Thiagarajan2, Awad M. Jarrar2, Soumya M. Turaga2, Caner Saygin2, Erin Mulkearns-Hubert2, Masahiro Hitomi2, Jeremy N. Rich3,4,5, Stanton L. Gerson4,5,6, Justin D. Lathia2,4,5, and Huiping Liu1,4,5,7,8

Abstract

The second International Conference in peutic resistance, and emerging novel concepts. The confer- Cleveland, Ohio, on September 20–23, 2016, convened 330 ence hosted 35 renowned speakers, 100 posters, 20 short attendees from academic, industrial, and clinical organiza- talks, and a preconference workshop. The reported advances tions. It featured a debate on the concepts and challenges of of CSC research and therapies fostered new collaborations the cancer stem cells (CSC) as well as CSC-centered scientific across national and international borders, and inspired the sessions on clinical trials, genetics and epigenetics, tumor next generation's young scientists. Cancer Res; 77(19); 5222–7. microenvironment, immune suppression, metastasis, thera- 2017 AACR.

Cancer Stem Cell Overview Yogen Saunthararajah. The heated debate covered the defini- tion, impact, and clinical implications of CSCs in cancer med- Over the last 20 plus years, cancer stem cells (CSC) have been icine, and more. On an achieved consensus, CSCs are function- functionally identified in human (1) and many solid ally identified by their self-renewal and tumorigenic capacity, tumors, such as breast, ovarian, prostate, brain, colon, lung, and whereas heterogeneous markers may be used to enrich CSCs others. Increasing evidence supports that CSCs remain the root of across cancers. Both intrinsic and extrinsic signaling pathways cancer, seeds of metastasis, and sources of therapy resistance (2). from genetic, epigenetic, and microenvironmental alterations Although the concept of CSCs has provided an opportunity to converge to regulate stemness of cells, thereby featuring the assess the complexity of cancer using a developmental-biology– plasticity of CSCs. Stemness signature genes are clearly associ- inspired paradigm, the big question remains to what level and ated with clinical outcomes of cancer patients (3), but strategies how CSCs would affect cancer medicine. CSC Conference 2016 targeting CSCs would need to be combined with other targeted provided a forum to challenge and foster the forefront research and immunotherapies to eradicate cancer and achieve durable and clinical applications of CSCs. disease status. At the opening session, a forum debate about the beliefs and The keynote speakers set up the high standard of the state-of- challenges on CSCs followed between two groups, including the the art research reports as well as challenges to the CSC field. believers Drs. John E. Dick, Luis Parada, and Tannishtha Reya, Dr. John E. Dick (University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, and the challengers Drs. Mina Bissell, Geoffrey M. Wahl, and Canada), who pioneered the CSC field by first identifying human leukemia stem cells (LSC; ref. 1) and colon CSCs, shared the dark side of stem cells (SC) where his latest research has 1 Department of Pharmacology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern identified that a preleukemic SC with DNMT3A mutations 2 University, Chicago, Illinois. Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, may be the first step in initiating disease and also the culprit Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, Ohio. 3Department of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research evading therapy and triggering relapse in patients with AML (4). Institute, Cleveland, Ohio. 4The Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Dr. Robert Weinberg (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Ohio. 5The National Center for Regenerative Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio. 6The Cambridge, MA) described normal and neoplastic SCs and University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio. 7Department of the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) program. EMT Medicine (Hematology and Oncology Division) and Robert H. Lurie Compre- transcription factors, such as Slug, Snail, Sox9, and Zeb1, coop- hensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, eratively act to determine the mammary SC state and CSC Chicago, Illinois. 8Deparmtent of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio. plasticity (5). Dr. Luis Parada (Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY) emphasized that CSCs are defined by function not N.K. Dashzeveg, R. Taftaf, and E.K. Ramos contributed equally to this article. by epitopes or surrogate assays. His work explored the stem Corresponding Author: Huiping Liu, Northwestern University, 303 E Superior St, cell origin of CSCs in malignant glioma and utilized the CDG Lurie 5-119, Chicago, IL 60611. Phone: 312-503-5248; Fax: 312-503-0189; E-mail: transgene in specific promoter elements to target both CSCs [email protected] and transit-amplifying cells. This discovery implicates that same doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0054 genetic drivers in different cells of origin develop distinct glio- 2017 American Association for Cancer Research. blastoma multiforme (GBM) tumor types (6).

5222 Cancer Res; 77(19) October 1, 2017

Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on October 1, 2021. © 2017 American Association for Cancer Research. Published OnlineFirst September 19, 2017; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0054

Advances of Targeting Cancer Stem Cells

Taken together with the work that identified DNMT3, TET2, using cellular DNA barcoding with multiplexed, high-resolution and ASXL1 as predictive markers for myeloid malignancy (7) techniques to better study the heterogeneity of human malig- and preleukemic mutations in hematopoietic stem cells (8) in nant tumors (17, 18). The frequencies of clone-initiating cells leukemic development, these findings support that SCs can be the vary from 1/10 to 1/10,000, and the carcinogenic process in cell-of-cancer-origin and sources of CSCs. human normal epithelia requires the acquisition of multiple driver mutations (18). Clinical Trials of CSC Targeting As discussed in the conference, cancer arises from the populations with self-renewal and multipotent properties. Therapeutics Dr. Geoffrey M. Wahl (Salk Institute, La Jolla, CA) examined The evolution of clinical trials that target CSCs holds promise of the plasticity of the fetal mammary SCs (fMaSC) as their affecting cancer medicine. CSC functions have been linked to transcriptome is significantly enriched in basal-A human breast dysregulated stem cell pathways such as Wnt, Notch, and Hedge- cancers. They exhibit characteristics of both luminal and hog signaling (9), which are fundamental for normal SCs. Despite basal cells. While their transcriptomes are different from 'CSC,' the great challenges to specifically target CSCs, two hedgehog they can be induced to undergo an atypical EMT that is also pathways inhibitors targeting SMO (LDE225/ and reversible and reflects that found in metastatic breast cancers. GDC-0449/) have received FDA approval for treating Differentiation by inflammation, oncogenes, or both, likely basal cell carcinoma (10). Notable approaches have been devel- will present challenges to therapies intended to selectively oped to target cancer-specific fusion receptors (11) and CD47 target CSCs (19). In addition, Dr. Benjamin Spike (Univer- (12). Ongoing CSC-targeting clinical trials are being conducted to sity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT) discussed the SC transcrip- evaluate their efficacy in a variety of cancers. tional continuum in mammary development and implications Dr. Max S. Wicha (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI) for CSCs with embryonic SC and fMaSC-like signatures. His discussed the therapeutic targeting of breast CSCs and outlined studies also showed that MCAM, Cripto-GRP78 pathways some of the therapeutic agents currently used in clinical trials regulate development (20). including demcizumab (anti-Notch ligand DLL4 antibody), Moreover, Dr. Xiling Shen (, Durham, NC) ipafricept (Fzd8 OMP-54F28), vantictumab addressed how asymmetric division determines cell fate, SC or (anti-Frizzled), reparixin (CXCR1 inhibitor), defactinib [focal non-SC, through miR-34a-Numb-Notch signaling cascade. A long adhesion kinase (FAK) inhibitor], tarextumab (OMP-59R5), noncoding RNA suppresses miR-34a by recruiting DNA methyl- and BBI608 (targets STAT3). His small-molecule and high- transferase Dnmt3a via prohibitin-2 and histone deacetylase 1 throughput siRNA screenings also discovered novel agents that (161). Dr. Marcus E. Peter (Northwestern University, Chicago, IL) target CSC regulatory pathways (13). Dr. Jonathan Pachter reported that chronic stimulation of CD95 results in lower levels (Verastem, Inc.) presented CSC-targeting strategies in clinical of miR-200c, monitored using a sensor plasmid for miR-200c, trials using selective inhibitors of FAK and PI3K/mTOR increasing the CD24 low stem-like population in breast cancer (14). Although targeting CSC alone may not be sufficient to cells (22). This is driven by a type I interferon/STAT1 pathway remove the bulk tumor, combining FAK inhibitors with other (23). Dr. Dean Tang (Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY) therapies such as the immune checkpoint blocking anti- emphasized NANOG-mediated reprograming in prostate cancer bodies is a promising strategy that is currently being tested (24). Dr. Marius Wernig (, Stanford, CA) in several clinical trials (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02546531, demonstrated that ASCL1, MYT1L, and BRN2 mediate direct con- NCT02758587, NCT02943317). CSC-targeting ChemoID drug version reprogramming of mouse embryonic fibroblasts and other response assays served as correlative endpoints and stratifica- cell types to functional neurons bypassing the induced pluripotent tion variables for (Pier Paolo Claudio, University stem cells. His group found that ASCL1 is sufficient to generate of Mississippi, Oxford, MS; ref. 15), which could lead to more functional neurons, whereas MYT1l (repressing nonneuronal pro- efficient and personalized anticancer therapy in the future. grams) and BRN2 enhance the maturation process (25). FABP5 drives self-renewal of triple-negative breast CSCs by A few short talks updated that DDB2 can limit the ovarian enhancing the transcriptional activity of PPARd to induce CSC population, probably through suppressing the transcrip- NANOG, SOX2, and OCT4 (Dr. Liraz Levi, Cleveland Clinic tion of ALDH1A1 as a transcription regulator (Qi-En Wang, þ Foundation, Cleveland, OH). FABP5 inhibitor-F19 was devel- Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; ref. 26). OLIG2 marks þ oped to decrease tumorigenesis and stemness (16). SOX2 quiescent SCs and mediates growth Although different therapeutic strategies targeting CSCs are through altering the epigenetic landscape to activate oncogenic being evaluated in clinical trials, combination therapies consist- pathways in adult mice (Q. Richard Lu, Cincinnati Children's ing of existing agents and CSC pathway inhibitors are to be Hospital, Cincinnati, OH). PRMT6- dependent CRAF/ERK sig- optimized to affect cancer care. Furthermore, high-throughput naling regulates CSC plasticity in liver cancer (Stephanie Ma, screenings may help better determine the best personalized University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong). A subset of connexin approach to treat patients. In addition, examining genomic altera- proteins drives self-renewal in triple-negative breast cancer by tions at premalignant stages (6, 7) could identity malignancy- forming an aberrant intracellular complex with FAK and specific targets. NANOG (Praveena Thiagarajan, Cleveland Clinic Foundation).

Genetics, epigenetics, and development Tumor microenvironment Accumulation of genetic and epigenetic alterations contributes Although both intrinsic and extrinsic factors merge to frame to the self-renewal and drug-resistant capacity of CSCs. Dr. Con- CSC plasticity, microenvironment influences play a pivotal nie Eaves (BC Cancer Agency), a keynote speaker, reported the role in the signaling cascades during CSC progression and clonal analysis of human breast cancer origins and progression, differentiation. Based on the pioneering work of keynote

www.aacrjournals.org Cancer Res; 77(19) October 1, 2017 5223

Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on October 1, 2021. © 2017 American Association for Cancer Research. Published OnlineFirst September 19, 2017; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0054

Dashzeveg et al.

speaker Dr. Mina Bissell (Lawrence Berkeley National Labora- ford University) highlighted that the MYC oncogene regulates tory, Berkeley, CA), tumor growth and malignant behavior are immune checkpoints through inducing CD47 and PD-L1 expres- regulated at the level of tissue organization and dependent on sion (33). MYC inactivation enhanced antitumor immune the extracellular matrix. Extracellular glucose determines response; therefore, reducing MYC expression and activity may malignant tumor phenotype via EPAC/RAP1 and O-GlcNAc restore immune response against cancer cells (33). pathways (27). The p53 association with laminin 5 induces Dr. Shideng Bao (Cleveland Clinic Foundation) described the dormancy of cancer cells, resulting in drug resistance. In GBM interplay between glioma SCs (GSC) and tumor-associated CSC studies, Dr. Jeremy Rich (Cleveland Clinic Foundation) macrophages (TAM). GSCs recruit tumor-supportive TAMs concluded that various microenvironmental niche factors, (M2) by secreting periostin, which binds to avb3 integrin on such as acidic conditions, glucose restriction, and iron meta- TAMs (34). Dr. Jeffrey Rosen (Baylor College of Medicine, Hous- bolism, modulate CSC functions. CSC-targeting strategies ton, TX) emphasized the cooperative role of WNT and FGF would be specifically tailored to the microenvironment. signaling pathways in the immune microenvironment in tumor Keynote speaker Dr. Carla F. Kim (Boston Children's Hospital, dormancy, recurrence, and metastasis. Inhibition of FGF receptor Boston, MA) spearheaded successful three-dimensional (3D) leads to regression of Wnt1/iR1 tumors and decreases recruitment cocultures of bronchioalveolar SCs (BASC) with endothelial cells of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), promoting EMT, and demonstrated that endothelium-derived Tsp1 influences tumor invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis. BASC alveolar differentiation under control of Bmp4-stimulated Dr. Justin D. Lathia (Cleveland Clinic Foundation) identified NFATc1 in a lung endothelium-specific manner (28). In addition, CSC-driven and immune-suppressive MDSCs in the brain of her recent work revealed the chromatin regulation of lung ade- GBM patients. CSC-derived MIF in GBM suppresses immune nocarcinoma tumor-propagating cells and BASCs via H3K9 rejection by recruiting MDSCs via immune suppressive enzyme methyltransferases G9a/Glp. Dr. Antonio Iavarone (Columbia arginase-1 in CXCR2-dependent manner (35). In addition, TLR4 University, New York, NY) described a mechanism where hypoxia decreases SC properties in CSCs by controlling retinoblastoma- drives the CSC state in GBM through inhibitor of differentiation binding protein 5 in GBM CSCs. In a separate study, autologous (ID), which is often amplified in both adult and pediatric gliomas dendritic cells loaded with antigens from autologous ovarian for tumor maintenance or upregulated in hypoxic conditions CSCs serve as an adjunctive treatment for advanced ovarian through the PHD1–DYRK1–ID2 signaling axis (29). His group cancer (Bob Dillman, AVITA Biomedical). developed a peptide that blocks the interaction between ID2 and the VHL ubiquitin ligase complex. Therapeutic resistance and heterogeneity Additional short talks further emphasized the role of micro- The role of CSCs in therapy resistance has been well estab- environmental signals in CSC regulation. Oncostatin-M in nor- lished based on previous studies (36). Dr. Tannishtha Reya mal human epithelial cells induces senescence marker GLB1 and (University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA) presented Snail expressions, which are related to EMT and CSC properties her work on SC signals in cancer heterogeneity and therapy (Benjamin Bryson, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, resistance. She reported that the SC determinant Musashi is a OH). Additional mechanisms include oncostatin-M–driven, critical driver of progression, and Musashi Zeb1-dependent induction of EMT and CSC properties in pan- reporters are a distinctive tool to identify therapy resistance creatic ductal adenocarcinoma (Neetha Parameswaran, Case (37). Dr. Peter Dirks (Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Western Reserve University), cancer-associated fibroblast regula- Ontario, Canada) reported that driving GBM cells into termi- tion on tumor-initiating cell (TIC) plasticity in hepatocellular nally differentiated neuronal lineage is important to reduce carcinoma (Yuen-Ting Eunice Lau, University of Hong Kong; resistance. Dr. Keith Chan (Baylor College of Medicine) ref. 30), and stearoyl-CoA desaturase as a mediator of TICs in reported that COX2-mediated PGE2 release contributes to þ hepatospheres (Terence Kin-Wah Lee, The Hong Kong Polytech- recruitment of CK14 cells following treatment, and that nic University, Hong Kong). Based on a mouse model for non– blockade of PGE2 release inhibits the accumulation of resis- small cell lung carcinoma, the alterations in the KEAP1/NRF2 tance to bladder cancer therapy (38). In addition, CD117 is a pathway may serve as predictive biomarkers for personalized sensitive marker for tumor grade and recurrence in prostate therapies against non–small cell lung cancers (Youngtae Jeong, cancer (Bethany Kerr, Wake Forest University; ref. 39). Inhibi- Stanford University; ref. 31). tion of CD55 holds great promise as a CSC- for cisplatin-resistant endometrioid tumor patients (Caner Saygin, Immune suppression and stemness Cleveland Clinic Foundation). Novel connexin-43 mimetic Studying the innate and adaptive immune response to cancer peptide (JM2) decreases connexin-43–mediated microtubule cells and CSCs has promoted one of the most promising thera- interaction in GSCs and reduces temozolomide resistance peutic approaches in the cancer field—immunotherapy. Dr. and neurosphere formation (Samy Lamouille, Virginia Tech Thomas F. Gajewski (University of Chicago, Chicago, IL) intro- Carillion Research Institute, Roanoke, VA; ref. 40). A 3D GBM- duced T-cell inflamed versus noninflamed tumor microenviron- CSC organoid culture system has been developed to preserve þ ments in melanoma. A CD8 T-cell infiltrate is ineffective at the cell heterogeneity and microenvironmental gradients in eradicating tumor cells unless the immune-suppressive Tregs, patient tumors and will aid in the development of new ther- PD1/PD-L1, and IDO (tryptophan metabolizing enzyme) are apies to treat the heterogeneity of GBM (Chris Hubert, Cleve- inhibited in combination. His work demonstrated that melano- land Clinic Foundation; ref. 41). ma-intrinsic b-catenin activation or PTEN loss prevents host antitumor immune response with reduced T-cell dynamics Metastasis, novel technologies, and new concepts (recruitment), a lack of T-cell–inflamed phenotype, and resistance Increasing evidence supports the mediation of CSCs in to anti–PD-1 immunotherapy (32). Dr. Dean W. Felsher (Stan- metastasis. The detection of a subpopulation of circulating

5224 Cancer Res; 77(19) October 1, 2017 Cancer Research

Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on October 1, 2021. © 2017 American Association for Cancer Research. Published OnlineFirst September 19, 2017; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0054

Advances of Targeting Cancer Stem Cells

tumor cell (CTC) with putative stem cell progenitor markers in Recognition of young scientists and career development patients with metastatic breast cancer and liver cancer impli- workshop þ cates circulating CSCs in metastasis. Lgr5 colorectal CSCs The young investigator awards recognized five outstanding werefoundtobemediatingcancer metastasis (42). Increased scientists. Their presentations featured (i) molecular mechanisms metastatic potential was later observed in breast cancer of CTC clustering in breast cancer (Xia Liu, Case Western Reserve patient–derived CTCs expressing putative CSC markers (43). University); (ii) a 3D culture system to model ovarian tumor Dr. Arnold I. Caplan (Case Western Reserve University) therapeutic resistance (Geeta Mehta, University of Michigan); (iii) emphasized the molecular control of melanoma metastasis CSC regulation of MDSC functions in GBM immune evasion into bone, demonstrating that mesenchymal stem cell/pericyte (Daniel Silver, Cleveland Clinic Foundation; ref. 35); (iv) PKA presence is required for efficient melanoma cancer cell intra- regulation of tumorigenicity and resistance vasation and extravasation to bone (44). A notable study was through activating PHF2 in immortalized human mammary cells shared by Dr. Simona Parrinello (Imperial London College, (Diwakar Pattabiraman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; London, United Kingdom) that in a murine GBM model, ref. 49); and (v) genetic imprinting of CpG methylation state ephrin-B2 drives perivascular invasion and proliferation of influences Hippo signaling through miR-127-SETD8-LAT2 path- glioma stem-like cells (45). way in stem/progenitor cells (Maider Zabala Ugalde, Stanford Recent evidence suggests that CTC clusters are present in the University). blood of cancer patients and correlated with metastasis and At the beginning of the preconference workshop, an NIH grant drug resistance in various cancers (46). CTC clusters showed workshop with talks from Dr. Michael Espey (NIH, Bethesda, 23- to 50-fold increase in metastatic ability compared with MD), Dr. Nywana Sizemore (NIH), and Dr. Ming Lei (NIH) single CTCs (46). Dr. Huiping Liu (Case Western Reserve covered trainee career development strategies, discussion of grant University) studies cluster formation of CTCs in breast cancer opportunities, and career options discussions. At the Meet-the anddiscussedtheroleofbreastCSCsinmetastasisusingPDX Editors session, Dr. Christine Weber and Dr. Deborah J. Sweet models. Her team demonstrated the cellular and molecular gave a brief overview of publishing in the Nature journals and Cell mechanisms (such as miR-206) via which CSCs promote Press, respectively. metastasis (36, 47). Dr. Sumanta Goswami (Yeshiva University, New York, NY) showed that Wnt mediates a cross-talk between Conclusions tumor microenvironment of metastasis and CSCs, suggesting a Although the link between developmental and cancer biology potential role of CSCs in metastasis. has long been appreciated, the assessment of stem cell programs A few presentations featured recent advances in new tech- in cancer has provided insight into cancer progression and pro- nologiestocaptureCTCsandimageCSCsaswellasin vided opportunities to develop next-generation cancer therapies. understanding of CSC-mediated recurrence and therapy resis- Cellular heterogeneity and plasticity represent significant chal- tance. CTC detection in the clinical samples has been chal- lenges in understanding stem cell biology. Given the intrinsic lenging. Dr. Sunitha Nagrath's lab (University of Michigan) attributes of CSCs and stemness signaling shown to suppress developed the GO-Chip made of graphene oxide and anti- immune response and mediate immunotherapy resistance, we body-coated microposts to rapidly separate CTCs from blood expect that targeting CSCs and modulating the tumor microen- samples (48). She demonstrated that 50% of patients with vironment to augment immune attacks on cancer would be a lungcancerwerefoundtohaveCTCsinclusters,andtheir promising strategy to combine with existing approaches against initial data show that these clusters correlate with survival. A cancer. new minimally invasive technique of intravital imaging using a lung window visualized the fate and microenvironment of tumor cells and CSCs in lung metastasis (Sonia Voiculescu, Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY). An No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed. optimized CTC isolation technique was employed to establish three cell lines of circulating cells with CSC Acknowledgments hallmarks and chemoresistance (Julie Pannequin, Institute of We acknowledge the National Center for Regenerative Medicine and Functional Genomic, Montpellier, France). A newly designed Case Comprehensive Cancer Center for hosting the conference. We gold nanoparticle, Smart Flare, was coated with a probe to appreciate the executive administrative team led by Charlene Mitchell who organized and made the conference a successful platform for scientific bind mRNA transcripts of interest in the living cells as well as exchange and new initiations of breakthrough research and clinical in CSCs (Steven McClellan, University of South Alabama, applications. Mobile, AL). Dr. Stanton L. Gerson (Case Western Reserve University and Grant Support University Hospitals) reported that autologous transplants of 6 The CSC 2016 and the meeting report were partially supported by hematopoietic progenitor cells with mutant O -alkylguanine NIH/NCIR13CA206377 (S.L. Gerson), P30 CA043703 (S.L. Gerson), and DNA alkyltransferase (MGMT) (P140K) overcome the side R00CA160638 (H. Liu). effects of combination therapies for GBM with temozolomide The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the 6 and MGMT inhibitor O -benzylguanine (BG). This approach payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked will allow patients to tolerate temozolomide and BG treat- advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate ment with minimal bone marrow toxicity due to the coupled this fact. low affinity of P140K mutant to BG. Preliminary results demonstrated that this chemoprotection strategy is tolerable Received January 6, 2017; revised May 25, 2017; accepted July 18, 2017; and safe. published OnlineFirst September 19, 2017.

www.aacrjournals.org Cancer Res; 77(19) October 1, 2017 5225

Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on October 1, 2021. © 2017 American Association for Cancer Research. Published OnlineFirst September 19, 2017; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0054

Dashzeveg et al.

References 1. Lapidot T, Sirard C, Vormoor J, Murdoch B, Hoang T, Caceres-Cortes J, et al. 25. Vierbuchen T, Ostermeier A, Pang ZP, Kokubu Y, Sudhof TC, Wernig M. A cell initiating human acute myeloid leukaemia after transplantation into Direct conversion of fibroblasts to functional neurons by defined factors. SCID mice. Nature 1994;367:645–8. Nature 2010;463:1035–41. 2. Adorno-Cruz V, Kibria G, Liu X, Doherty M, Junk DJ, Guan D, et al. Cancer 26. Han C, Zhao R, Liu X, Srivastava A, Gong L, Mao H, et al. DDB2 suppresses stem cells: targeting the roots of cancer, seeds of metastasis, and sources of tumorigenicity by limiting the cancer stem cell population in ovarian therapy resistance. Cancer Res 2015;75:924–9. cancer. Mol Cancer Res 2014;12:784–94. 3. Ng SW, Mitchell A, Kennedy JA, Chen WC, McLeod J, Ibrahimova N, et al. A 27. Onodera Y, Nam JM, Bissell MJ. Increased sugar uptake promotes 17-gene stemness score for rapid determination of risk in acute leukaemia. oncogenesis via EPAC/RAP1 and O-GlcNAc pathways. J Clin Invest Nature 2016;540:433–7. 2014;124:367–84. 4. Shlush LI, Zandi S, Mitchell A, Chen WC, Brandwein JM, Gupta V, et al. 28. Lee JH, Bhang DH, Beede A, Huang TL, Stripp BR, Bloch KD, et al. Lung stem Identification of pre-leukaemic haematopoietic stem cells in acute leukae- cell differentiation in mice directed by endothelial cells via a BMP4- mia. Nature 2014;506:328–33. NFATc1-thrombospondin-1 axis. Cell 2014;156:440–55. 5. Guo W, Keckesova Z, Donaher JL, Shibue T, Tischler V, Reinhardt F, et al. 29. Lasorella A, Benezra R, Iavarone A. The ID proteins: master regulators of Slug and Sox9 cooperatively determine the mammary stem cell state. Cell cancer stem cells and tumour aggressiveness. Nat Rev Cancer 2014; 2012;148:1015–28. 14:77–91. 6. Alcantara Llaguno SR, Wang Z, Sun D, Chen J, Xu J, Kim E, et al. Adult 30. Lau EY, Lo J, Cheng BY, Ma MK, Lee JM, Ng JK, et al. Cancer-associated lineage-restricted CNS progenitors specify distinct glioblastoma subtypes. fibroblasts regulate tumor-initiating cell plasticity in hepatocellular Cancer Cell 2015;28:429–40. carcinoma through c-Met/FRA1/HEY1 signaling. Cell Rep 2016;15: 7. Jaiswal S, Fontanillas P, Flannick J, Manning A, Grauman PV, Mar BG, et al. 1175–89. Age-related clonal hematopoiesis associated with adverse outcomes. 31. Jeong Y, Hoang NT, Lovejoy A, Stehr H, Newman AM, Gentles AJ, et al. Role N Engl J Med 2014;371:2488–98. of KEAP1/NRF2 and TP53 mutations in lung squamous cell carcinoma 8. Shlush LI, Zandi S, Mitchell A, Chen WC, Brandwein JM, Gupta V, et al. development and radiation resistance. Cancer Discov 2016;7:86–101. Identification of pre-leukaemic haematopoietic stem cells in acute leukae- 32. Spranger S, Bao R, Gajewski TF. Melanoma-intrinsic beta-catenin signalling mia. Nature 2014;506:328–33. prevents anti-tumour immunity. Nature 2015;523:231–5. 9. Reya T, Clevers H. Wnt signalling in stem cells and cancer. Nature 2005; 33. Casey SC, Tong L, Li Y, Do R, Walz S, Fitzgerald KN, et al. MYC regulates the 434:843–50. antitumor immune response through CD47 and PD-L1. Science 2016; 10. Rimkus TK, Carpenter RL, Qasem S, Chan M, Lo HW. Targeting the sonic 352:227–31. hedgehog signaling pathway: review of and GLI inhibitors. 34. Zhou W, Ke SQ, Huang Z, Flavahan W, Fang X, Paul J, et al. Periostin Cancers 2016;8. secreted by glioblastoma stem cells recruits M2 tumour-associated 11. Storm EE, Durinck S, de Sousa e Melo F, Tremayne J, Kljavin N, Tan C, et al. macrophages and promotes malignant growth. Nat Cell Biol 2015; Targeting PTPRK-RSPO3 colon tumours promotes differentiation and loss 17:170–82. of stem-cell function. Nature 2016;529:97–100. 35. Otvos B, Silver DJ, Mulkearns-Hubert EE, Alvarado AG, Turaga SM, 12. Majeti R, Chao MP, Alizadeh AA, Pang WW, Jaiswal S, Gibbs KD Jr., et al. Sorensen MD, et al. Cancer stem cell-secreted macrophage migration CD47 is an adverse prognostic factor and therapeutic antibody target on inhibitory factor stimulates myeloid derived suppressor cell function and human acute myeloid leukemia stem cells. Cell 2009;138:286–99. facilitates glioblastoma immune evasion. Stem Cells 2016;34:2026–39. 13. McDermott SP, Wicha MS. Targeting breast cancer stem cells. Mol Oncol 36.LiuH,PatelMR,PrescherJA,PatsialouA,QianD,LinJ,etal.Cancer 2010;4:404–19. stem cells from human breast tumors are involved in spontaneous 14. Kolev VN, Wright QG, Vidal CM, Ring JE, Shapiro IM, Ricono J, et al. PI3K/ metastases in orthotopic mouse models. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A mTOR dual inhibitor VS-5584 preferentially targets cancer stem cells. 2010;107:18115–20. Cancer Res 2015;75:446–55. 37. Fox RG, Lytle NK, Jaquish DV, Park FD, Ito T, Bajaj J, et al. Image-based 15. Howard CM, Valluri J, Alberico A, Julien T, Mazagri R, Marsh R, et al. detection and targeting of therapy resistance in pancreatic adenocarcino- Analysis of chemopredictive assay for targeting cancer stem cells in glio- ma. Nature 2016;534:407–11. blastoma patients. Transl Oncol 2017;10:241–54. 38. Kurtova AV, Xiao J, Mo Q, Pazhanisamy S, Krasnow R, Lerner SP, et al. 16. Levi L, Wang Z, Doud MK, Hazen SL, Noy N. Saturated fatty acids regulate Blocking PGE2-induced tumour repopulation abrogates bladder cancer retinoic acid signalling and suppress tumorigenesis by targeting fatty acid- chemoresistance. Nature 2015;517:209–13. binding protein 5. Nat Commun 2015;6:8794. 39. Kerr BA, Miocinovic R, Smith AK, West XZ, Watts KE, Alzayed AW, et al. þ 17. Nguyen LV, Cox CL, Eirew P, Knapp DJ, Pellacani D, Kannan N, et al. DNA CD117 cells in the circulation are predictive of advanced prostate cancer. barcoding reveals diverse growth kinetics of human breast tumour sub- Oncotarget 2015;6:1889–97. clones in serially passaged xenografts. Nat Commun 2014;5:5871. 40. Garcia Coma M, Targarona Soler EM, Marco Molina C. [Usefulness of 18. Nguyen LV, Pellacani D, Lefort S, Kannan N, Osako T, Makarem M, et al. echography with pancreatic stimulation in the evaluation of acute pan- Barcoding reveals complex clonal dynamics of de novo transformed creatitis associated with pancreas divisum]. Rev Esp Enferm Apar Dig human mammary cells. Nature 2015;528:267–71. 1989;75:87–90. 19. Wahl GM, Spike BT. Cell state plasticity, stem cells, EMT, and the gener- 41. Hubert CG, Rivera M, Spangler LC, Wu Q, Mack SC, Prager BC, et al. A ation of intra-tumoral heterogeneity. NPJ Breast Cancer 2017;3:14. doi: Three-dimensional organoid culture system derived from human glioblas- 10.1038/s41523-017-0012-z. tomas recapitulates the hypoxic gradients and cancer stem cell heteroge- 20. Spike BT, Kelber JA, Booker E, Kalathur M, Rodewald R, Lipianskaya J, et al. neity of tumors found in vivo. Cancer Res 2016;76:2465–77. CRIPTO/GRP78 signaling maintains fetal and adult mammary stem cells 42. Melo FS, Kurtova AV, Harnoss JM, Kljavin N, Hoeck JD, Hung J, et al. A ex vivo. Stem Cell Rep 2014;2:427–39. distinct role for Lgr5þ stem cells in primary and metastatic colon cancer. 21. Wang L, Bu P, Ai Y, Srinivasan T, Chen HJ, Xiang K, et al. A long non-coding Nature 2017;543:676–80. RNA targets microRNA miR-34a to regulate colon cancer stem cell asym- 43. Baccelli I, Schneeweiss A, Riethdorf S, Stenzinger A, Schillert A, Vogel V, metric division. Elife 2016;5. et al. Identification of a population of blood circulating tumor cells from 22. Ceppi P, Hadji A, Kohlhapp FJ, Pattanayak A, Hau A, Liu X, et al. CD95 breast cancer patients that initiates metastasis in a xenograft assay. Nat and CD95L promote and protect cancer stem cells. Nat Commun 2014; Biotechnol 2013;31:539–44. 5:5238. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6238. 44.CorreaD,SomozaRA,LinP,SchiemannWP,CaplanAI.Mesen- 23. Qadir AS, Ceppi P, Brockway S, Law C, Mu L, Khodarev NN, et al. CD95/ chymal stem cells regulate melanoma cancer cells extravasation to Fas increases stemness in cancer cells by inducing a STAT1-dependent bone and liver at their perivascular niche. Int J Cancer 2016;138: type I interferon response. Cell Reports 2017;18:2373–86. 417–27. 24. Jeter CR, Yang T, Wang J, Chao HP, Tang DG. Concise review: NANOG in 45. Krusche B, Ottone C, Clements MP, Johnstone ER, Goetsch K, Lieven H, cancer stem cells and tumor development: an update and outstanding et al. EphrinB2 drives perivascular invasion and proliferation of glioblas- questions. Stem Cells 2015;33:2381–90. toma stem-like cells. Elife 2016;5.

5226 Cancer Res; 77(19) October 1, 2017 Cancer Research

Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on October 1, 2021. © 2017 American Association for Cancer Research. Published OnlineFirst September 19, 2017; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0054

Advances of Targeting Cancer Stem Cells

46. Aceto N, Bardia A, Miyamoto DT, Donaldson MC, Wittner BS, Spencer JA, 48. Yoon HJ, Shanker A, Wang Y, Kozminsky M, Jin Q, Palanisamy N, et al. et al. Circulating tumor cell clusters are oligoclonal precursors of breast Tunable thermal-sensitive polymer-graphene oxide composite for effi- cancer metastasis. Cell 2014;158:1110–22. cient capture and release of viable circulating tumor cells. Adv Mater 47. Samaeekia R, Adorno-Cruz V, Bockhorn J, Chang YF, Huang S, Prat 2016;28:4891–7. A, et al. MicroRNA-206 inhibits stemness and metastasis of breast 49. Pattabiraman DR, Bierie B, Kober KI, Thiru P, Krall JA, Zill C, et al. cancer by targeting MKL1/IL11 pathway. Clin Cancer Res 2017;23: Activation of PKA leads to mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition and loss 1091–103. of tumor-initiating ability. Science 2016;351:aad3680.

www.aacrjournals.org Cancer Res; 77(19) October 1, 2017 5227

Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on October 1, 2021. © 2017 American Association for Cancer Research. Published OnlineFirst September 19, 2017; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0054

New Advances and Challenges of Targeting Cancer Stem Cells

Nurmaa K. Dashzeveg, Rokana Taftaf, Erika K. Ramos, et al.

Cancer Res 2017;77:5222-5227. Published OnlineFirst September 19, 2017.

Updated version Access the most recent version of this article at: doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0054

Supplementary Access the most recent supplemental material at: Material http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/suppl/2021/03/06/0008-5472.CAN-17-0054.DC1

Cited articles This article cites 46 articles, 8 of which you can access for free at: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/77/19/5222.full#ref-list-1

Citing articles This article has been cited by 3 HighWire-hosted articles. Access the articles at: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/77/19/5222.full#related-urls

E-mail alerts Sign up to receive free email-alerts related to this article or journal.

Reprints and To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications Department at Subscriptions [email protected].

Permissions To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, use this link http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/77/19/5222. Click on "Request Permissions" which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Rightslink site.

Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on October 1, 2021. © 2017 American Association for Cancer Research.