Applications of Twitter Emotion Detection for Stock Market Prediction by Clare H

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Applications of Twitter Emotion Detection for Stock Market Prediction by Clare H Applications of Twitter Emotion Detection for Stock Market Prediction by Clare H. Liu S.B., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2016) Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Engineering in Computer Science and Engineering at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2017 ○c Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2017. All rights reserved. Author................................................................ Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science May 18, 2017 Certified by. Andrew W. Lo Charles E. and Susan T. Harris Professor Thesis Supervisor Accepted by........................................................... Christopher J. Terman Chairman, Masters of Engineering Thesis Committee 2 Applications of Twitter Emotion Detection for Stock Market Prediction by Clare H. Liu Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science on May 18, 2017, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Engineering in Computer Science and Engineering Abstract Currently, most applications of sentiment analysis focus on detecting sentiment polar- ity, which is whether a piece of text can be classified as positive or negative. However, it can sometimes be important to be able to distinguish between distinct emotions as opposed to just the polarity. In this thesis, we use a supervised learning approach to develop an emotion classifier for the six Ekman emotions: joy, fear, sadness, disgust, surprise, and anger. Then we apply our emotion classifier to tweets from the 2016 presidential election and financial tweets labeled with Twitter cashtags and evaluate the effectiveness of using finer-grained emotion categorization to predict future stock market performance. Thesis Supervisor: Andrew W. Lo Title: Charles E. and Susan T. Harris Professor 3 4 Acknowledgments First of all, I would like to express my gratitude to my thesis supervisor, Professor Andrew Lo, for giving me the opportunity to explore a new field, and for his insightful ideas and feedback. I would also like to thank Allie, Jayna, and Crystal for providing me with important resources and for their scheduling help. I especially want to thank Shomesh Chaudhuri for giving me crash courses on finance and providing invaluable suggestions and guidance over the past two years. Finally, I wish to thank my parents for their unconditional support and encour- agement. 5 6 Contents 1 Introduction 13 1.1 Thesis Organization . 14 2 Literature Review 17 2.1 Emotion Classification . 17 2.2 Relationship Between Twitter Sentiment and Stock Market Performance 19 2.3 Predicting Presidential Elections . 21 3 Creating an Emotion Classifier 23 3.1 Multiclass Classification Algorithms . 23 3.1.1 One-vs-rest . 24 3.1.2 One-vs-one . 24 3.1.3 Logistic Regression . 24 3.1.4 Random Forests . 25 3.2 Datasets . 26 3.3 Baselines . 26 3.4 Methodology . 27 3.4.1 Feature Selection . 27 3.4.2 Data Preparation . 28 3.4.3 Implementation Details . 28 3.5 Evaluation Metrics . 29 3.6 Results . 31 3.7 Discussion . 32 7 4 Emotion Analysis of Presidential Election Tweets 35 4.1 Datasets . 35 4.1.1 Data Preparation . 36 4.2 Emotion Distributions on Election Day . 36 4.2.1 Election Day Key Events . 37 4.2.2 Comparison with Polarity-Based Sentiment Analysis . 37 4.2.3 Using Volume to Identify Events . 40 4.3 Can Presidential Debates Predict Market Returns? . 42 4.3.1 Summary of Candidate Policies . 42 4.3.2 S&P 500 Returns after Election Day . 43 4.3.3 Who won the Presidential Debates? . 44 4.3.4 S&P 500 Reactions to Presidential Debates . 46 4.4 Discussion . 48 5 Emotion Analysis of Financial Tweets 51 5.1 Datasets . 51 5.2 Correlation Between Emotions and Stock Prices . 52 5.3 Using Volume to Identify Events . 55 5.4 Sentiment-Based Trading Strategy . 57 5.4.1 Preliminary Results . 58 5.4.2 Reevaluation of Emotion Classifier Performance . 61 5.5 Keyword-Based Trading Strategy . 65 5.5.1 Evaluation of Trading Strategy Performance . 66 5.6 Discussion . 68 6 Conclusions and Future Work 69 8 List of Figures 4-1 Average Sentiment during the 2016 Presidential Election . 37 4-2 2016 Election Day Emotion Distributions . 39 4-3 First Presidential Debate . 41 4-4 Emotion Distributions during the First Presidential Debate . 44 5-1 Twitter Volume Plots for Microsoft and Facebook . 57 5-2 Preliminary Trading Strategy Performance for Microsoft, Facebook, and Yahoo . 60 5-4 Microsoft sentiment using keywords during earnings announcement on April 21 . 65 5-5 Keyword-based Trading Strategy . 66 9 10 List of Tables 3.1 Examples of Labeled Tweets . 26 3.2 Tweet Processing Example . 28 3.3 Model Comparison . 31 3.4 Logistic Regression Accuracy Metrics . 32 3.5 Classification Examples . 33 3.6 Examples of Classification Errors . 34 4.1 S&P 500 Sectors before and after Election Day . 43 4.2 Clinton: Change in joy tweets before and after debates . 45 4.3 Trump: Change in joy tweets before and after debates . 45 4.4 Morning Consult Poll Results . 46 4.5 S&P 500 Industries Before and After First Presidential Debate . 46 4.6 S&P 500 Industries Before and After Second Presidential Debate . 47 4.7 S&P 500 Industries before and after Third Presidential Debate . 48 5.1 Correlation between average emotion percentages and next-day stock returns . 53 5.2 Correlation between average emotion percentages and same-day stock returns . 54 5.3 Noise in $AAPL Tweets . 55 5.4 Microsoft Earnings Announcement Classification Examples . 62 5.5 Yahoo Earnings Announcement Classification Errors . 63 5.6 Trading Strategy Comparison . 67 5.7 Trading Strategy Statistics . 67 11 12 Chapter 1 Introduction Over the past decade, the rise of social media has enabled millions of people to share their opinions and react to current events in real time. As of June 2016, Twitter has over 300 monthly active users and over 500 million tweets are posted per day [53]. Ever since the official Twitter API was introduced in 2006, users and researchers have been applying sentiment analysis algorithms on this massive data source to gauge public opinion towards emerging events. Automatic sentiment analysis algorithms have been used in a variety of applications, including evaluating customer satisfaction, fraud detection, and predicting future events, such as the results of a presidential election. Currently, most publicly available sentiment analysis libraries focus on detecting sentiment polarity, which is whether a piece of text expresses a positive, negative, or neutral sentiment. However, due to the wide range of possible human emotions, there are some limitations to using this coarse-grained approach for some applications. For instance, the producers of a horror movie may wish to use sentiment analysis to summarize understand their audience’s opinion of the movie. Boredom and fear could both be classified as negative emotions, but the producers would be happy iftheir viewers expressed fear, while they would probably modify their approach for future movies if the viewers were bored. In this thesis, we will evaluate the merits and limitations of using a finer-grained emotion classification scheme compared to the more common sentiment polarity ap- proach. We will also evaluate the possibility of predicting future stock returns based 13 on emotion distributions of tweets from two contrasting domains: presidential elec- tions and financial tweets mentioning NASDAQ-100 companies. The election ofa new president has wide implications on the future of United States and international economies, which usually results in stock market volatility. Company stock prices have also been shown to be affected by market sentiment, especially following impor- tant events such as earnings announcements and acquisitions. Since presidential elections and volatility in the stock market often evoke strong emotions in people, using a finer-grained emotion analysis approach could reveal more interesting insights about the public’s perception of candidates and publicly traded companies, potentially leading to more accurate and profitable stock market predictions. 1.1 Thesis Organization The remainder of this thesis is organized as follows: ∙ Chapter 2 contains a literature review of past work in automatic emotion de- tection and in using Twitter to predict future stock market performance and the results of presidential elections. ∙ Chapter 3 then details the construction of and evaluates the performance of an emotion classifier for the six basic Ekman emotions. ∙ In chapter 4, we analyze tweets from the 2016 presidential election to determine whether emotion classification can be used to identify differences in public opin- ion towards the two presidential candidates. Then we investigate the correlation between the policies of presidential debate winners and the market performance of related industries on the following day. ∙ In chapter 5, we will evaluate the correlation between emotion distributions of tweets tagged with cashtags of the NASDAQ-100 companies and future stock returns for these companies. We then look at trends in Twitter volume and 14 sentiment for different tickers to identify significant events and predict outcomes on future returns. Finally, we will propose a simple trading strategy based on sentiment expressed in earnings announcement tweets. ∙ Finally, chapter 6 will summarize our major findings and suggest possible av- enues for future research. 15 16 Chapter 2 Literature Review This chapter discusses approaches to automatic emotion classification and related work in using social media for stock market prediction. 2.1 Emotion Classification In 1992, psychologist Paul Ekman argued that there are six basic emotions: anger, fear, sadness, joy, disgust, and surprise. These emotions share nine characteristics with a biological basis, including distinctive universal signals, presence in other pri- mates, and quick onset. He also argued that all other emotional states can be grouped into one of these basic emotions or classified as moods, emotional traits, or emotional attitudes instead [11].
Recommended publications
  • 1605026 NY Spotlight Memo
    ! MEMORANDUM TO: Interested Parties FROM: Alixandria Lapp, Executive Director, House Majority PAC DATE: May 26, 2016 RE: Congressional Democrats Poised for Pick-Ups Across the Empire State With just over a month until New York’s June 28 congressional primaries, and just under six months from the November general election, Democrats are poised for significant pick-ups in congressional districts across the Empire State. This year Democrats are overwhelmingly on offense in New York – with at least six Republican held seats that could be flipped this November. Multiple Republican incumbents and challengers are finding their already-precarious political prospects diminishing even further as they struggle with a damaging party brand, a toxic presidential ticket-mate, and increasingly prove themselves out of touch with their own districts. Bottom line: With New York’s congressional Republicans increasingly vulnerable heading into the fall, Democrats are overwhelmingly on offense and well-positioned to win key districts across the state in 2016. New York Republicans Tied to Toxic Brand As in any presidential year, down-ballot races will be heavily shaped by the top of the ticket. For Republicans, particularly in New York, that’s bad news. Even before the GOP presidential race took shape, New York’s congressional Republicans faced significant structural political challenges. In six competitive Republican-held districts, President Obama either won or came within 1% of winning in 2008 and 2012. Now with Donald Trump as their presidential ticket-mate, down-ballot prospects for New York Republicans are far worse. Earlier this month, a poll by Morning Consult found that nearly half of all Americans would “be less likely to support candidates for public office if they say they back Donald Trump.” And despite Donald Trump’s big win in New York’s presidential primary, there’s no indication that it will translate to success in November.
    [Show full text]
  • National Tracking Poll 200771
    National Tracking Poll #200771 July 17-19, 2020 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted between July 17-July 19, 2020 among a national sample of 2200 Adults. The interviews were conducted online and the data were weighted to approximate a target sample of Adults based on age, gender, educational attainment, race, and region. Results from the full survey have a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points. Table Index 1 Table THS1: Generally speaking, how secure would you say your private messages are on social media sites? ........................................ 4 2 Table THS2: And how concerned would you say you are, if at all, about your private, direct messages on social media sites being hacked? .......................... 8 3 Table THS3: How much have you seen, read or heard about the recent Twitter hack where the accounts of Joe Biden, Elon Musk, Kayne West, Barack Obama, Bill Gates and many public figures were hijacked and hackers tweeted from those accounts to request people send Bitcoin to various addresses? ...................................... 12 4 Table THS4_1: Given the recent Twitter hack, how much do you trust social media companies to keep the following personal information safe and secure? Your full name . 16 5 Table THS4_2: Given the recent Twitter hack, how much do you trust social media companies to keep the following personal information safe and secure? Email address . 20 6 Table THS4_3: Given the recent Twitter hack, how much do you trust social media companies to keep the following personal information safe and secure? Birth date . 24 7 Table THS4_4: Given the recent Twitter hack, how much do you trust social media companies to keep the following personal information safe and secure? Banking information .
    [Show full text]
  • Morning Consult Respondent Demographics Summary
    National Tracking Poll Project: 2103166 N Size: 2043 Registered Voters Margin of Error: ± 2% Topline Report March 26-29, 2021 Question Response Frequency Percentage P1 Now, generally speaking, would you say that things in the country are going in the right direction, or have they pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track? Right Direction 1031 50% Wrong Track 1012 50% nr2b Do you approve or disapprove of the job Joe Biden is doing as President? Strongly Approve 681 33% Somewhat Approve 494 24% Somewhat Disapprove 213 10% Strongly Disapprove 581 28% Don’t Know / No Opinion 74 4% nr2bNET Do you approve or disapprove of the job Joe Biden is doing as President? Total Approve 1175 58% Total Disapprove 794 39% Don’t Know / No Opinion 74 4% P3 Now, thinking about your vote, what would you say is the top set of issues on your mind when you cast your vote for federal offices such as U.S. Senate or Congress? Economic Issues – like taxes, wages, jobs, 718 35% unemployment, and spending Security Issues – like terrorism, foreign policy, and 307 15% border security Health Care Issues – like the 2010 health care law, 326 16% Medicaid, other challenges Seniors Issues – like Medicare and Social Security 290 14% Women’s Issues – like birth control, abortion, and equal 102 5% pay Education Issues – like school standards, class sizes, 84 4% school choice, and student loans Energy Issues – like carbon emissions, cost of 83 4% electricity/gasoline, or renewables Other: 133 7% Page | 1 Question Response Frequency Percentage POL1_1 Do you approve or disapprove
    [Show full text]
  • House Admin Hearing 6-11-21
    WRITTEN STATEMENT OF ASHLEE N. TITUS PARTNER, BELL, MCANDREWS & HILTACHK, LLP SECRETARY AND BOARD MEMBER, LAWYERS DEMOCRACY FUND VOTING IN AMERICA: THE POTENTIAL FOR POLLING PLACE QUALITY AND RESTRICTIONS ON OPPORTUNITIES TO VOTE TO INTERFERE WITH FREE AND FAIR ACCESS TO THE BALLOT THE COMMITTEE ON HOUSE ADMINISTRATION U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES JUNE 11, 2021 Thank you, Chairperson Butterfield, Ranking Member Steil, and members of the Committee for allowing me to speak before you today. The conversation before the Committee today is vitally important. Free and fair access to the ballot is essential to a functioning and enduring democracy. Free and fair access ensures that all eligible voters can vote and be confident that their votes count. It means that citizens recognize the election as free and fair and therefore accept the results of an election no matter which candidate wins. Safeguards that protect the freedom and fairness of the entire election process give the American people that confidence in the election results. I am excited to address the Committee today on these important issues. My name is Ashlee Titus. I am an attorney at Bell, McAndrews, & Hiltachk in Sacramento, California specializing in campaign finance and election law. As part of my election law practice, I organize lawyers to observe elections in California and have been an observer myself in several California counties over the last 17 years. I also serve as the Secretary and on the Board of Directors for Lawyers Democracy Fund, a non- profit, nonpartisan organization dedicated to promoting the role of ethics and legal professionalism in the electoral process.
    [Show full text]
  • Most of Trump's Charts Skew the Data. A...Always in His Favor
    Skip The Fix (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/) (https://twitter.com(h/ttrpesa:l/D/otwniatltdeTr.rcuomm(hp/t/trpsetsaa:l/tDu/otswn/i7at5ltde5Tr1.rcu7o6mm(3hp/t6/tr8pse7tsaa:8l/tD3u/ot1swn8/i7at5lt9de76Tr69.rcu8)om8m(h3p/t3/trp1set5saa:9l/tD7u/ot6swn/6i7a8t5lt3de7T5r6.r3cu5o)m0m(h9p/t0/trps4etsa8a:l9/tDu/6ows1n/w37a9w5ld2.7iT6n6r4su1t)8ma(0hgpt4r/ta8psm6tsa:6./ct4u/ows8m/2w7/9wp59./8f5Ba02Ic0Ve)4Nb18o5_o4uk4D.c1Xo7xm50/5/D)3o4n0a9ld) Trump/photos/a.488852220724.393301.153080620724/10157375935840725/? type=3&theater) (https://twitter.com(h/ttrpesa:l/D/otwniatltdeTr.rcuomm(hp/t/trpsetsaa:l/tDu/otswn/i7at5ltde8Tr3.rcu5om0m(h4p/t7/trp0sets4aa:l0/tDu/2ots4wn/0i7at86ltde40Tr42.rcu91om3)m(h6p/t2/trp8sets9aa:2l/tDu/6ots7wn/7i7a9t6ltd3e8T9r5.r2cu7o)m8m(h4p/t7/tr8pse2tsaa:6l/tD6u/ot4swn/5i7at86ltd1e91Tr3.3rcu3)om1m(h8p/t4/trp1se3tsaa:1l/tD6u/o6wsn/8w7a7w6l8d.97fTa3rcu3)em1b8po4/o1sk3t.ac1to6um6s/8/7D768o97n3a3)ld1T8r4u1m3p1/6p6h8o7t8o7s/3a).488852220724.393301.153080620724/10157616391995725/? type=3&theater) (https://twitter.com/realD(o) naldTrum(hpt/tpstsa:/tu/tsw/i7t7te3r9.c7o2m(h3/t0trp5es6a:4l/D/2ow9nw1a3wld7.fT9ar2cu)em(bhpot/topskts.ac:/tou/mws//w7Dw7o.6inn0as5ltd8a(Th5grtr3utapm8ms1p:.3/c/7/op4wmh5wo/2twpo5./si4Bn/8sKa)t.Va4(thg8ytr78tapz8mDs5:.9/2c/Mo2tmw20i/t)p7te2/rB4.cK.3oVm9tv3/P3Toe0jat1Xm.1c5T/r)3u0m8p0/6s2ta0t7u2s4/7/1706185775609534493306933107972553/) ? type=3&theater) (https://twitter.com(h/ttTpesa:/m/Twrwuwm.pfa/cseta(bhtotutospk/s.7c:/7o/6mt8w/6iDt6toe5nr2.ac0lod0mT3r/0uTm9e3ap7m/0pT8hr8ou)tmosp//as.t4a8tu8s8/57277252400723463.369730310515.215713)080620724/10157707883725725/?
    [Show full text]
  • National Tracking Poll 170601
    National Tracking Poll Project: 170601 N Size: 1999 Registered Voters Margin of Error: 2% Topline Report June 01-02, 2017 Question Response Frequency Percentage P1 Now, generally speaking, would you say that things in the country are going in the right direction, or have they pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track? Right Direction 840 42% Wrong Track 1159 58% Q172 Do you approve or disapprove of the job Donald Trump is doing as President? Strongly Approve 415 21% Somewhat Approve 462 23% Somewhat Disapprove 276 14% Strongly Disapprove 752 38% Don’t Know / No Opinion 94 5% Q172NET Do you approve or disapprove of the job Donald Trump is doing as President? Total Approve 877 44% Total Disapprove 1028 51% Don’t Know / No Opinion 94 5% P3 Now, thinking about your vote, what would you say is the top set of issues on your mind when you cast your vote for federal offices such as U.S. Senate or Congress? Economic Issues 599 30% Security Issues 376 19% Health Care Issues 349 17% Senior’s Issues 282 14% Women’s Issues 89 4% Education Issues 133 7% Energy Issues 96 5% Other 76 4% POL1_1 Who do you trust more to handle each of the following issues? The economy Democrats in Congress 749 37% Republicans in Congress 887 44% Don’t Know / No Opinion 364 18% POL1_2 Who do you trust more to handle each of the following issues? Jobs Democrats in Congress 755 38% Republicans in Congress 889 44% Don’t Know / No Opinion 355 18% Page | 1 Question Response Frequency Percentage POL1_3 Who do you trust more to handle each of the following issues? Health care
    [Show full text]
  • Bernie Sanders Refers to Blacks As Poor
    Bernie Sanders Refers To Blacks As Poor Whitney is snow-white and plunk worse while hard-up Giancarlo astonish and reposits. Tapelike Nestor swob straitly, he progs his instatements very insipidly. Parasynthetic and ecologic Seymour infract her spondulicks tical undermined and misconstrue lithographically. Why do i have missed an independent allowed him, sanders to blacks poor as a host of racism have revealed now running as the united states that a higher taxes Black people have long been taken advantage of by white men with lofty promises. In Hay Ettadhamen, he said. To be clear, licenses, and supporting the development of generic drugs. Abandoned investigation, free college education, from poor families or had left school early. Join the frantic calls for blacks who sits in as sanders to blacks poor whites are to. What looked like cooperatives and slow, alabama rural residents are poor sanders? She understands that people access knowledge and information according to their level of understanding and their experiences. This story has been corrected to show Bennet launched his campaign in early May, and The Week, at least momentarily. Joe Biden is not the perfect candidate. For progressive loading case this metric is logged as part of skeleton. Be respectful, today it can be measured in the waning interest of black millennials in the Clinton campaign. The campaign website also added the plan would basically pay for itself. The Biden family is so heavily invested in oil and energy in other countries. This covenant with his supporters is his great achievement. He then deflected the attention and used the opportunity to shout out Jen Ellis, a Vermont school teacher, England.
    [Show full text]
  • The Secret to Brand Success on Tiktok Proven Strategies for Audience Engagement on This Rapidly Rising Social Media Network Table of Contents
    The Secret to Brand Success on TikTok Proven strategies for audience engagement on this rapidly rising social media network Table of Contents Introduction 3 Who's on TikTok? 4 First, Define Your ‘Why’ 5 Reimagining Your Brand Personality 6 Content Creation 8 Proven Brand Strategies 11 TikTok Personalities Need Brand Content 16 Measuring Success 17 Getting Started 18 The Secret to Brand Success on TikTok 2 The Secret to Brand Success on TikTok Introduction TikTok quickly became a major player in social media, even before the COVID-19 pandemic forced the world to stay at home. Now, with rapidly accelerating growth, the short-form video social network can’t be ignored. TikTok offers organizations access to a unique audience with a platform that allows them to influence awareness and perception of their brand more than any social network has before. It’s time to take stock of TikTok. With over 52 million active users in the US (800 million worldwide) and 74% of US social media users aged 13-21, TikTok has access to a young, energetic and difficult-to-reach demographic.Get ( more TikTok stats). Younger people love TikTok exactly because it’s not like other social media networks. It’s a place where creators thrive, where the focus is less about production and more about personal entertainment and storytelling—everyone here is a performer. If Twitter is where brands can build their voice, and Instagram is where brands establish their aesthetic, TikTok is perfect for brands to activate their multi-dimensional personality. And, it’s the perfect place to set up a digital shop if your brand is working with advocates, customers, or avid fans to cultivate and share your message.
    [Show full text]
  • National Tracking Poll 2106187
    National Tracking Poll #2106187 June 25-28, 2021 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted between June 25-June 28, 2021 among a sample of 1989 Registered Voters. The interviews were conducted online and the data were weighted to approximate a target sample of Registered Voters based on gender, age, educational attainment, race, 2020 presidential vote, and region. Results from the full survey have a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points. Table Index 1 Table P1: Now, generally speaking, would you say that things in the country are going in the right direction, or have they pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track? .......... 8 2 Table nr2b: Do you approve or disapprove of the job Joe Biden is doing as President? . 12 3 Table nr2bNET: Do you approve or disapprove of the job Joe Biden is doing as President? . 16 4 Table P3: Now, thinking about your vote, what would you say is the top set of issues on your mind when you cast your vote for federal offices such as U.S. Senate or Congress? . 20 5 Table POL1_1: Do you approve or disapprove of how President Biden is handling each of the following? The economy ..................................... 25 6 Table POL1_2: Do you approve or disapprove of how President Biden is handling each of the following? Jobs ......................................... 29 7 Table POL1_3: Do you approve or disapprove of how President Biden is handling each of the following? Health care ..................................... 33 8 Table POL1_4: Do you approve or disapprove of how President Biden is handling each of the following? Immigration ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Content Filtering Practices of Social Media Giants
    FACEBOOK, GOOGLE AND TWITTER: EXAMINING THE CONTENT FILTERING PRACTICES OF SOCIAL MEDIA GIANTS HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JULY 17, 2018 Serial No. 115–64 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.govinfo.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 33–418 WASHINGTON : 2018 VerDate Sep 11 2014 04:46 Dec 24, 2018 Jkt 033418 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 E:\HR\OC\A418.XXX A418 dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with HEARING COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY BOB GOODLATTE, Virginia, Chairman F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., JERROLD NADLER, New York Wisconsin ZOE LOFGREN, California LAMAR SMITH, Texas SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas STEVE CHABOT, Ohio STEVE COHEN, Tennessee DARRELL E. ISSA, California HENRY C. ‘‘HANK’’ JOHNSON, JR., Georgia STEVE KING, Iowa THEODORE E. DEUTCH, Florida LOUIE GOHMERT, Texas LUIS V. GUTIE´ RREZ, Illinois JIM JORDAN, Ohio KAREN BASS, California TED POE, Texas CEDRIC L. RICHMOND, Louisiana TOM MARINO, Pennsylvania HAKEEM S. JEFFRIES, New York TREY GOWDY, South Carolina DAVID CICILLINE, Rhode Island RAU´ L LABRADOR, Idaho ERIC SWALWELL, California BLAKE FARENTHOLD, Texas TED LIEU, California DOUG COLLINS, Georgia JAMIE RASKIN, Maryland KEN BUCK, Colorado PRAMILA JAYAPAL, Washington JOHN RATCLIFFE, Texas BRAD SCHNEIDER, Illinois MARTHA ROBY, Alabama VALDEZ VENITA ‘‘VAL’’ DEMINGS, Florida MATT GAETZ, Florida MIKE JOHNSON, Louisiana ANDY BIGGS, Arizona JOHN RUTHERFORD, Florida KAREN HANDEL, Georgia
    [Show full text]
  • Affordable Care Act Entrenchment
    ARTICLES Affordable Care Act Entrenchment ABBE R. GLUCK* & THOMAS SCOTT-RAILTON** The Affordable Care Act (ACA) is the most challengedÐand the most resilientÐstatute in modern American history. Through and despite hun- dreds of court challenges, scores of congressional repeal efforts, unex- pected state resistance, gutting by the Supreme Court, unprecedented administrative strangulation, and criticism from the beginning that the statute did not go far enough to embrace the principle of universal healthcare, the ACA has changed the way many Americans and the polit- ical arena think about healthcare and the entitlement to it. Over its ten-year lifespan, the ACA went from being the rallying cry of the GOP in 2010, to the center of the Democratic platform in 2018, cata- pulting universal healthcare to the top of the 2020 Democratic presiden- tial primary agenda. It began as a statute criticized for its practical compromises and its incrementalismÐincluding leaving most insurance in the private market and retaining state control over large swaths of health policyÐbut those very compromises have, surprisingly, proved key to the ACA's resilience. They have also been instrumental in the ACA's entrenchment of not only its own reforms but also a broader, emerging principle of a universal right to healthcare. The idea of health- care for all Americans administered through the federal government was long viewed as political suicide, including as recently as the 2016 presi- dential election. In an astonishingly fast turnaround, that idea has now been considered and debated by every Democratic presidential hopeful. The ACA's principles have been codi®ed outside of federal law and into state law, voted on in ballot initiatives, and advocated for on late- night TV.
    [Show full text]
  • State's Responses As of 8.21.18 (00041438).DOCX
    DEMOCRACY DIMINISHED: STATE AND LOCAL THREATS TO VOTING POST‐SHELBY COUNTY, ALABAMA V. HOLDER As of May 18, 2021 Introduction For nearly 50 years, Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) required certain jurisdictions (including states, counties, cities, and towns) with a history of chronic racial discrimination in voting to submit all proposed voting changes to the U.S. Department of Justice (U.S. DOJ) or a federal court in Washington, D.C. for pre- approval. This requirement is commonly known as “preclearance.” Section 5 preclearance served as our democracy’s discrimination checkpoint by halting discriminatory voting changes before they were implemented. It protected Black, Latinx, Asian, Native American, and Alaskan Native voters from racial discrimination in voting in the states and localities—mostly in the South—with a history of the most entrenched and adaptive forms of racial discrimination in voting. Section 5 placed the burden of proof, time, and expense1 on the covered state or locality to demonstrate that a proposed voting change was not discriminatory before that change went into effect and could harm vulnerable populations. Section 4(b) of the VRA, the coverage provision, authorized Congress to determine which jurisdictions should be “covered” and, thus, were required to seek preclearance. Preclearance applied to nine states (Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas, and Virginia) and a number of counties, cities, and towns in six partially covered states (California, Florida, Michigan, New York, North Carolina, and South Dakota). On June 25, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States immobilized the preclearance process in Shelby County, Alabama v.
    [Show full text]