DOCSLIB.ORG

Moving-To-Work – CARES Act State PHA PHA Name (Recipient)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Moving-To-Work – CARES Act State PHA PHA Name (Recipient) Moving-to-Work – CARES Act State PHA PHA Name (Recipient) City Award Amount CA CA003 Oakland Housing Authority Oakland $ 2,852,782 CA CA014 Housing Authority of the County of San Mateo BELMONT $ 71,622 CA CA030 Tulare County Housing Authority VISALIA $ 417,598 CT CT004 Housing Authority of the City of New Haven NEW HAVEN $ 815,764 DC DC001 D.C Housing Authority Washington $ 2,731,692 DE DE901 Delaware State Housing Authority Dover $ 137,336 Housing Authority of the City of ATLANTA $ 2,863,928 GA GA006 Georgia Atlanta IL IL002 Chicago Housing Authority CHICAGO $ 919,652 KS KS053 Lawrence/Douglas County Housing Authority LAWRENCE $ 93,488 KY KY001 Louisville Metro Housing Authority Louisville $ 1,145,784 MA MA003 Cambridge Housing Authority Cambridge $ 986,524 NH NH010 Keene Housing KEENE $ 112,522 OH OH031 Portage Metropolitan Housing Authority RAVENNA $ 202,102 PA PA001 Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh PITTSBURGH $ 822,696 PA PA002 Philadelphia Housing Authority Philadelphia $ 3,175,744 WA WA001 Seattle Housing Authority SEATTLE $ 1,756,750 WA WA002 HA OF KING COUNTY Seattle $ 1,492,340 TOTAL $20,598,324 Supplemental Administrative Fee Funding (Mainstream) – CARES Act State PHA Name (Recipient) City Award Amount AK Alaska Housing Finance Corporation Anchorage $ 864,930 AL Housing Authority of the Birmingham District BIRMINGHAM $ 606,772 AL MOBILE HOUSING BOARD MOBILE $ 495,324 AL ANNISTON HA ANNISTON $ 33,424 AL PHENIX CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY PHENIX CITY $ 94,806 AL Housing Authority of the City of Montgomery Montgomery $ 365,544 AL Housing Authority of the City of Dothan DOTHAN $ 91,396 AL Selma Housing Authority SELMA $ 98,394 AL Housing Authority of the City of Fort Payne FORT PAYNE $ 13,840 AL Housing Authority of the City of Jasper JASPER $ 25,224 AL The Guntersville Housing Authority GUNTERSVILLE $ 21,190 AL The Housing Authority of the City of Huntsville HUNTSVILLE $ 210,082 AL Housing Authority of the City of Decatur DECATUR $ 94,700 AL Greater Gadsden GADSDEN $ 14,262 AL HA AUBURN Auburn $ 85,198 AL HA CULLMAN CULLMAN $ 19,040 AL Housing Authority of Hamilton, Alabama HAMILTON $ 9,114 AL FLORENCE H/A FLORENCE $ 87,744 AL HA RUSSELLVILLE RUSSELLVILLE $ 11,456 AL HA OPELIKA OPELIKA $ 60,430 AL H A ONEONTA ONEONTA $ 6,540 AL Sheffield Housing Authority SHEFFIELD $ 38,244 AL HA LEEDS Leeds $ 38,432 AL HA COLUMBIANA Columbiana $ 30,962 AL HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF OZARK OZARK $ 41,076 AL BOAZ HOUSING AUTHORITY BOAZ $ 42,818 AL HA TUSCALOOSA TUSCALOOSA $ 175,572 AL Jefferson County Housing Authority BIRMINGHAM $ 259,714 AL PHIL CAMPBELL HOUSING AUTHORITY PHIL CAMPBELL $ 6,766 AL HA ARAB ARAB $ 7,564 AL HA SCOTTSBORO SCOTTSBORO $ 21,800 AL Housing Authority of the City of Talladega, AL TALLADEGA $ 67,358 AL HA ELBA ELBA $ 13,090 AL HA OPP OPP $ 11,628 AL LINEVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY Lineville $ 5,818 AL ENTERPRISE HOUSING AUTHORITY ENTERPRISE $ 19,024 AL YORK HOUSING AUTHORITY York $ 8,640 AL EUFAULA HOUSING AUTHORITY EUFAULA $ 41,246 AL Albertville Housing Authority ALBERTVILLE $ 47,846 AL HA MIDLAND CITY MIDLAND CITY $ 8,896 AL HA BESSEMER BESSEMER $ 69,028 AL WALKER COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY Dora $ 32,328 AL Housing Authority of the City of Prattville, AL PRATTVILLE $ 4,554 AL GORDO HOUSING AUTHORITY Gordo $ 16,890 AL HA JACKSONVILLE Jacksonville $ 19,186 AL HA NORTHPORT NORTHPORT $ 50,506 AL HA ATMORE ATMORE $ 9,568 AL Housing Authority of the City of GREENVILLE GREENVILLE $ 20,000 AL TUSKEGEE HOUSING AUTHORITY Tuskegee $ 14,400 AL HA FOLEY FOLEY $ 30,896 AL The Housing Authority of the City of Prichard Prichard $ 319,310 AL UNIONTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY Uniontown $ 4,500 AL HA TALLASSEE TALLASSEE $ 4,192 AL Housing Authority of the City of Alexander City Alexander City $ 33,762 AL HA TROY TROY $ 33,914 AL EVERGREEN HOUSING AUTHORITY EVERGREEN $ 21,766 AL South Central Alabama Regional HA TROY $ 145,154 AL MOBILE COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY CITRONELLE $ 12,270 AR North Little Rock Housing Authority North Little Rock $ 171,430 AR The Housing Authority of the City of Fort Smi FORT SMITH $ 195,324 AR Housing Authority of the City of Little Rock Little Rock $ 336,250 AR Housing Authority of the City of Conway CONWAY $ 41,846 AR NW Regional Housing Authority HARRISON $ 75,686 AR Arkadelphia Housing Authority ARKADELPHIA $ 16,536 AR Housing Authority of the City of Texarkana Texarkana $ 85,618 AR Camden Housing Authority CAMDEN $ 42,388 AR Housing Authority of the City of Pine Bluff PINE BLUFF $ 113,942 AR Little River County Housing Authority Foreman $ 5,106 AR West Memphis Housing Authority WEST MEMPHIS $ 65,356 AR Hot Springs Housing Authority Hot Springs $ 99,620 AR Logan County Housing Authority Booneville $ 10,926 AR Trumann Housing Authority TRUMANN $ 18,428 AR Searcy Housing Authority SEARCY $ 14,192 AR Housing Authority of the City of Prescott PRESCOTT $ 7,932 AR Wynne Housing Authority WYNNE $ 20,666 AR Lonoke County Housing Authority Carlisle $ 30,398 AR Star City Housing Authority STAR CITY $ 3,886 AR Pike County Housing Authority Murfreesboro $ 6,978 AR Clarendon Housing Authority CLARENDON $ 2,498 AR Housing Authority of the City of Brinkley BRINKLEY $ 1,212 AR Russellville Housing Authority RUSSELLVILLE $ 17,212 AR Hope Housing Authority HOPE $ 13,672 AR Warren Housing Authority WARREN $ 6,024 AR Springdale Housing Authority SPRINGDALE $ 15,528 AR Polk County Housing Authority MENA $ 6,336 AR Paragould Housing Authority PARAGOULD $ 63,156 AR Jonesboro Urban Renewal HA JONESBORO $ 160,198 AR DeValls Bluff Housing Authority DeValls Bluff $ 4,254 AR Lake Village Housing Authority Lake Village $ 11,572 AR CONWAY COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY Morrilton $ 27,372 AR Siloam Springs Housing Authority Siloam Springs $ 48,100 AR Stuttgart Housing Authority Stuttgart $ 26,482 AR Jacksonville Housing Authority JACKSONVILLE $ 45,440 AR Housing Authority of the City of Benton, AR BENTON $ 87,134 AR Clay County Public Housing Agency Piggott $ 15,264 AR Lawrence County Public Housing Agency Walnut Ridge $ 40,328 AR Fayetteville Housing Authority Fayetteville $ 76,524 AR Crawford Co. Public Facilties Board Van Buren $ 41,584 AR White River Regional Housing Authority Melbourne $ 212,086 AR Harrison Housing Authority Harrison $ 57,572 AR Drew County Public Facilities Board Monticello $ 31,554 AR Pope County Public Facilities Board RUSSELLVILLE $ 18,364 AR Mississippi County Public Facilities Board Osceola $ 53,796 AR Ashley County Housing Authority Hamburg $ 24,174 AR Johnson County Public Housing Agency Clarksville $ 17,332 AR Cabot Public Housing Agency Cabot $ 40,866 AR Phillips County Public Housing Agency Helena $ 35,310 AR St. Francis County Housing Authority Forrest City $ 58,906 AR Lee County Housing Authority Marianna $ 29,242 AR Poinsett County Housing Agency Trumann $ 14,176 AR Scott County Public Housing Agency Waldron $ 8,588 AR Franklin County Public Housing Agency Ozark $ 10,190 AR Pocahontas Public Housing Agency (BRAD) Pocahontas $ 10,538 AR Pulaski County Housing Agency Little Rock $ 44,350 AR McGehee Public Facilities Board McGehee $ 21,548 AR Earle Housing Authority West Memphis $ 6,644 AR Yell County Public Facilities Board Dardanelle $ 6,970 AR Desha Co. Residential Housing Fac Board McGehee $ 17,634 AZ City of Phoenix Housing Department PHOENIX $ 823,544 AZ City of Glendale Housing Authority GLENDALE $ 135,968 AZ Housing and Community Development Tucson TUCSON $ 587,194 AZ City of Mesa Housing Authority MESA $ 229,188 AZ Flagstaff Housing Authority FLAGSTAFF $ 65,408 AZ Winslow Public Housing Authority WINSLOW $ 12,412 AZ Housing Authority of Maricopa County Peoria $ 214,418 AZ Pinal County Housing Authority CASA GRANDE $ 60,242 AZ Yuma County Housing Department SOMERTON $ 62,976 AZ Eloy Housing Authority ELOY $ 26,782 AZ Nogales Housing Authority NOGALES $ 22,054 AZ South Tucson Housing Authority SOUTH TUCSON $ 11,592 AZ Chandler Housing & Redevelopment Division CHANDLER $ 65,960 AZ Tempe Housing Authority Tempe $ 127,430 AZ Scottsdale Housing Agency Scottsdale $ 88,414 AZ Pima County Housing Authority Tucson $ 104,688 AZ Housing Authority of Cochise County Bisbee $ 62,492 AZ Yuma City Housing Authority YUMA $ 215,832 AZ Douglas Housing Authority Douglas $ 20,348 AZ Williams Housing Authority WILLIAMS $ 5,294 AZ Mohave County Housing Authority Kingman $ 75,336 AZ Gila County Housing Authority Globe $ 6,096 AZ Arizona Behavioral Health Corporation Phoenix $ 16,284 AZ Arizona Department of Housing Phoenix $ 22,504 CA Housing Authority of the City & County of SF SAN FRANCISCO $ 2,956,722 CA Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles ALHAMBRA $ 5,251,046 CA Oakland Housing Authority Oakland $ 229,544 CA Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles LOS ANGELES $ 10,251,016 CA Housing Authority City of Fresno FRESNO $ 1,135,268 CA County of Sacramento Housing Authority SACRAMENTO $ 1,982,334 CA Housing Authority of the County of Kern BAKERSFIELD $ 649,894 CA Housing Authority of the City of Richmond RICHMOND $ 300,854 CA Housing Authority of the County Contra Costa MARTINEZ $ 1,536,682 CA Housing Authority of the County of San Mateo BELMONT $ 953,306 CA Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino SAN BERNARDINO $ 1,509,828 CA Housing Authority of the County of Santa Barbara LOMPOC $ 819,112 CA Housing Authority of the City of Needles NEEDLES $ 3,298 CA County of Merced Housing Authority MERCED $ 378,022 CA Housing Auth. of the County of San Joaquin STOCKTON $ 733,142 CA Housing Authority of the County of Stanislaus Modesto $ 768,278 CA Housing Authority of the County of Riverside RIVERSIDE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
    [Show full text]
  • Town and Country Planning Board of Victoria
    1965-66 VICTORIA TWENTIETH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING BOARD OF VICTORIA FOR THE PERIOD lsr JULY, 1964, TO 30rH JUNE, 1965 PRESENTED TO BOTH HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 5 (2) OF THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1961 [Appro:timate Cost of Report-Preparation, not given. Printing (225 copies), $736.00 By Authority A. C. BROOKS. GOVERNMENT PRINTER. MELBOURNE. No. 31.-[25 cents]-11377 /65. INDEX PAGE The Board s Regulations s Planning Schemes Examined by the Board 6 Hazelwood Joint Planning Scheme 7 City of Ringwood Planning Scheme 7 City of Maryborough Planning Scheme .. 8 Borough of Port Fairy Planning Scheme 8 Shire of Corio Planning Scheme-Lara Township Nos. 1 and 2 8 Shire of Sherbrooke Planning Scheme-Shire of Knox Planning Scheme 9 Eildon Reservoir .. 10 Eildon Reservoir Planning Scheme (Shire of Alexandra) 10 Eildon Reservoir Planning Scheme (Shire of Mansfield) 10 Eildon Sub-regional Planning Scheme, Extension A, 1963 11 Eppalock Planning Scheme 11 French Island Planning Scheme 12 Lake Bellfield Planning Scheme 13 Lake Buffalo Planning Scheme 13 Lake Glenmaggie Planning Scheme 14 Latrobe Valley Sub-regional Planning Scheme 1949, Extension A, 1964 15 Phillip Island Planning Scheme 15 Tower Hill Planning Scheme 16 Waratah Bay Planning Scheme 16 Planning Control for Victoria's Coastline 16 Lake Tyers to Cape Howe Coastal Planning Scheme 17 South-Western Coastal Planning Scheme (Shire of Portland) 18 South-Western Coastal Planning Scheme (Shire of Belfast) 18 South-Western Coastal Planning Scheme (Shire of Warrnambool) 18 South-Western Coastal Planning Scheme (Shire of Heytesbury) 18 South-Western Coastal Planning Scheme (Shire of Otway) 18 Wonthaggi Coastal Planning Scheme (Borough of Wonthaggi) 18 Melbourne Metropolitan Planning Scheme 19 Melbourne's Boulevards 20 Planning Control Around Victoria's Reservoirs 21 Uniform Building Regulations 21 INDEX-continued.
    [Show full text]
  • Moreland History Publications Books
    MORELAND HISTORY PUBLICATIONS Some with notes. This list is a work in progress and should not be considered comprehensive. Last updated: 17 December 2012. Most of the following publications can be consulted at Moreland Libraries http://www.moreland.vic.gov.au/moreland-libraries.html Contents: Books Theses Periodicals Newspapers Heritage studies BOOKS Arranged in order of publication, earliest first. Jubilee history of Brunswick : and illustrated handbook of Brunswick and Coburg F.G. Miles Contributor(s): R. A Vivian ; Publisher: Melbourne : Periodicals Publishing Company Date(s): 1907 Description: 119p. : ill., ports. ; 29cm (photocopy). Subjects: City of Moreland, Brunswick (Vic.), Coburg (Vic.) Location: Brunswick Library history room 994.51 JUB Location: Coburg Library history room 994.51 MEL An index concerning the history of Brunswick No author or date. ‘This is an index of persons and subject names concerning the history of Brunswick. The index is based on the “Jubilee history of Brunswick” 1907.’ Location: Brunswick Library history room 994 INDE (SEE ALSO Index of the Jubilee history of Brunswick 1907 prepared by Merle Ellen Stevens 1979) Reports on Coburg Council meetings in local newspapers Oct 1912 to December 1915 No publication date so entered under publication of newspaper. Location: Coburg Library history room 352.09451 REP The City of Coburg : the inception of a new city : 1850-1922. Description [43 leaves] : ill., maps ; 30 cm. Subjects Coburg (Vic.) --History. Location: Coburg Library history room 994.51 CIT Coburg centenary 1839-1939, official souvenir: celebrations August - October, 1939 Walter Mitchell Coburg, Vic : Coburg City Council, 1939. 24 p. : ill., portraits, pbk ; 25 cm.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Portland Union Pacific Railroad
    CITY OF PORTLAND UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CHICAGO AND NORTH WESTERN LINE CITY OF PORTLAND The "City of Port- land" described in this booklet is a 13-car train plus a 3-car Diesel power unit. Perhaps the most outstanding feature of this train is the Observa- tion-Lounge Car, named the "Copper King," embodying remarkable innovations in railroad development. The deft decorations, unique and colorful, are by Mrs. W. A. Harriman, wife of the Chairman of the Board of the Union Pacific. Her contribu- tion to the unusual interior decorations of other Union Pacific streamline trains has created con- siderable favorable comment. The "Copper King" is the first "light-condi- tioned" car in railroading and the first in which copper has been used so extensively for interior decoration, finishings and appointments. The final touch of the selections of color schemes for the furniture, the decorating, upholstering, carpeting and the exquisite buffet and other interior appoint- ments was added by Mrs. Harriman. Pullman passengers enjoy complete relaxation in the -Copper King". The “Copper King" Observation-Lounge Car. • As the name implies, the "Copper King" is resplendent in shimmering copper. The side walls have satin finished copper paneling. Tables, smoke-stands and other accessories are constructed of copper bronze and the same metal has been skillfully used in the specially designed furniture. The service buffet, near the entrance to the car, is a harmonious symphony of copper and glass. As a result of using copper as the dominant decorative note, the interior has a rich glowing beauty enhanced by the contrasting deep green and henna material with which lounges and chairs are upholstered.
    [Show full text]
  • Moreland Heritage Gap Study 2017 Volume 2B
    MORELAND HERITAGE GAP STUDY 2017 VOLUME 2B: RESIDENTIAL PLACE CITATIONS Brunswick East Brunswick West Coburg Fitzroy North 22 OCTOBER 2018 Prepared for City of Moreland STAGE 2 FINAL REPORT INDEX HOUSE, 8 AINTREE STREET, BRUNSWICK EAST ..................................................................... 5 History ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Description .................................................................................................................................. 8 Comparative analysis ................................................................................................................... 8 Statement of significance ............................................................................................................. 9 Recommendations ..................................................................................................................... 10 TERRACE HOUSES, 23 & 25 ALBERT STREET, BRUNSWICK EAST ............................................11 History ...................................................................................................................................... 12 Description ................................................................................................................................ 15 Comparative analysis ................................................................................................................. 16 Statement of significance
    [Show full text]
  • Union Station Appendix a Project Phasing Concept
    Appendix A - Project Phasing 1 Portland Union Station Building & Tracks Improvement Project City of Portland (City), Multnomah County, Oregon Implementation Plan/Project Phases The Build Alternative for the Project is comprised of two major work areas: architectural and building related improvements and trackside/rail yard improvements. Each work area has several components. The availability and securing of future funding, the need to maintain passenger and freight rail operations and keep the station building operable/usable during construction activities, and potential impacts to station users necessitate a phased approach to implementing these improvements over time. Because of these constraints, a potential phasing scenario/implementation strategy was recommended by Prosper Portland’s Project consultants in which the Project as a whole could be built, breaking up the work into multiple phases, which are described below. Additional information is available in Proposed Improvements at Portland Union Station-Implementation Plan Report, IBI Group, May 2019. Track Phase Descriptions Proposed Track improvements for Portland Union Station have been subdivided into four phases. • Phase T1 – Passenger Crossing Relocation: This phase would relocate the existing passenger crossing approximately 120 feet to the north in order to allow for increased train berthing capacity at the station. FRA and Amtrak would need to review and approve design plans for this phase to ensure compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the US Department of Transportation’s ADA standards for transportation facilities. To accommodate the shift of the passenger crossing, a minimal amount of Main Building reconfiguration is recommended to minimize conflicts between Amtrak baggage/service vehicles and passengers boarding and disembarking trains and passenger movement to/from the Main Building concourse.
    [Show full text]
  • Portland Rose
    PORTLAND ROSE Coach – Stabled at Council Bluffs The Portland Rose was built by American Car & Foundry in 1947, the Portland Rose was re-routed to run between Denver 1953 as 44-seat coach No. 5473. It was renamed the Portland and Portland. On Jan. 10, 1954, service was extended to Kansas Rose in 1990. City, Mo., replacing Pony Express trains between Kansas City This coach was named after the train Portland Rose, which and Denver. Portland Rose service ended May 1, 1971. began service between Chicago and Portland, Ore., on Sept. 12, 1930. The Portland Rose was heralded as “A Triumph in Train Comfort,” with its own china pattern and specially decorated club observation car, the Portland Club. This car featured a radio, soda fountain, maid service, hairdresser, barber, valet and bath. The rose was the decorative motif for this train. The soft, deep pink of “Madame Caroline Testout,” the official rose of Portland, was the prevailing color. Through the Columbia River Gorge, between The Dalles and Portland, an open top observation car was added on the rear of the train. In 1941, the Portland Rose took on a Challenger section with meal prices of 35 cents for breakfast, 40 cents for lunch and 50 cents for dinner. The entire train was air-conditioned, but the luxury accommodations were found on the streamliner PASSAGEWAY RESTROOM City of Portland and the Portland Rose. This second section PASSAGEWAY RESTROOM ran 10 minutes behind and combined with the Portland Rose PASSAGEWAY at Green River, Wyo., to finish the trip to Portland. When Configuration: Portland Rose is a Flat Coach Car with public restrooms at each end of streamliner City of Portland began daily operation on Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Land Use and Employment Policy Plan
    Industrial Land Use Study and Employment Policy Plan City of Minneapolis Approved by Minneapolis Planning Commission: June 12, 2006 Approved by Minneapolis City Council: November 3, 2006 Prepared by: QSA Quam, Sumnicht & Associates, Inc. June 1, 2006 Ms. Jennifer Jordan, Planner City of Minneapolis Department of Community, Planning, and Economic Development 350 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55415 Dear Ms. Jordan: We are pleased to present a final copy of the Industrial Land Use Study and Employment Policy Plan. We hope elected officials, city staff members, and community members will utilize our analysis to inform current and future policymaking and land use planning. We greatly enjoyed working with you. Sincerely, Mary Bujold Grant Martin Mark Spector President Senior Research Analyst Research Analyst TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... i 1 INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT AND MINNEAPOLIS............................................. 1 1.1 Industrial Land Use Study (ILUS) Objectives ................................................................... 1 1.2 Study Structure....................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Industry is Important to Minneapolis ................................................................................. 2 1.4 Industrial-to-Residential Conversions: Impact on Property Tax Base and Revenue... 8 1.5 Industrial-to-Residential Conversions:
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State Long-Range Plan for Amtrak Cascades
    Washington State Long-Range Plan for Amtrak Cascades February 2006 Prepared by the Freight Systems Division Washington State Department of Transportation February 2006 For more information, contact: z Call the WSDOT State Rail Office at (360) 705-7900 or 1-800-822-2015; z Write to the WSDOT State Rail Office at P.O. Box 47407, Olympia, WA 98504-7407; z Fax your comments to (360) 705-6821; or z E-mail your comments to [email protected] Persons with disabilities may request this information be prepared and supplied in alternate forms by calling the WSDOT ADA Accommodation Hotline collect 206-389-2839. Persons with vision or hearing impairments may access the WA State Telecommunications Relay Service at TT 1-800-833-6388, Tele-Braille 1-800-833-6385, or Voice 1-800-833-6384, and ask to be connected to 360-705-7097. Washington State Long-Range Plan for Amtrak Cascades Prepared for the Washington State Department of Transportation By The Resource Group Consultants, Inc. Transit Safety Management, Inc. HDR Engineering, Inc. Berk & Associates, Inc. AECOM Consult, Inc. February 2006 Table of Contents List of Exhibits .......................................................................................................iii Executive Summary................................................................................................v Chapter One: Introduction ..................................................................................1-1 What is intercity passenger rail? .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Government Emblems, Embodied Discourse and Ideology: an Artefact-Led History of Governance in Victoria, Australia
    Government Emblems, Embodied Discourse and Ideology: An Artefact-led History of Governance in Victoria, Australia Katherine Hepworth Doctor of Philosophy 2012 ii iii Abstract Government emblems are a rich source of historical information. This thesis examines the evidence of past governance discourses embodied in government emblems. Embodied discourses are found within an archive of 282 emblems used by local governments in Victoria, Australia in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. They form the basis of a history of governance in the State of Victoria from first British exploration in 1803 to the present day. This history of governance was written to test the main contribution of this thesis: a new graphic design history method called discursive method. This new method facilitates collecting an archive of artefacts, identifying discourses embodied within those artefacts, and forming a historical narrative of broader societal discourses and ideologies surrounding their use. A strength of discursive method, relative to other design history methods, is that it allows the historian to seriously investigate how artefacts relate to the power networks in which they are enmeshed. Discursive method can theoretically be applied to any artefacts, although government emblems were chosen for this study precisely because they are difficult to study, and rarely studied, within existing methodological frameworks. This thesis demonstrates that even the least glamorous of graphic design history artefacts can be the source of compelling historical narratives. iv Acknowledgements This thesis would not have been written without the support of many people. Fellow students, other friends and extended family have helped in many small ways for which I am so grateful.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Pacific's E-9 No. 951 Union Pacific's E·9 No. 951 Vishs Portola
    Union Pacific's E·9 No. 951 visHs Portola, California during Railroad Days in August 1988 -Norman Holmes Photo Union Pacific's E-9 No. 951 Union Pacific Locomotive No. 951 is the last of Union Pacific's high Union Pacific for use on special trains such as inspection speed diesel-electrics built for service on the famous specials and occasional employee special trains. streamliner and domeliner passenger trains. In 1974, No. 951 was loaned to the sponsors of the The 2400 horsepower locomotive was built for Union American Freedom Train to promote the AFT's bicentennial Pacific Railroad by the Electro-Motive Division (EMD) of tour. The locomotive was repainted into a bicentennial paint General Motors and delivered in June 1955. scheme of red, white and blue and toured much of the nation r The unit, one of 69 EMD model E-9 units on the Union pulling the "Preamble Express" in advance of the widely Pacific, pulled such famous trains as the City of Los Angeles, publicized steam-powered Freedom Train tours in 1975 and City of Portland, City of San Francisco, City of St. Louis and 1976. The locomotive maintained it's patriotic look until 1978 Challenger. when it was repainted in it's original Union Pacific armour The sleek units, considered among the most graceful yellow colors. locomotives in American railroading, evolved from the first In August 1980, the eight units were retired. Seven were Union Pacific streamlined locomotives back in 1934. The "E" sold or donated to museums. No. 951 was kept as UP's last E series was started by EMD in the late 1930's.
    [Show full text]
  • Smartoutput Moreland City Council
    smartOutput Moreland City Council The Business The City of Moreland is a Local Government area located within the Metropolitan area of Melbourne in Victoria, Australia. It is comprised of the inner northern suburbs of the Melbourne city centre and covers an area of 51km2. The area was established in 1994 during the forced amalgamations of the former local government areas of the City of Brunswick, the City of Coburg and a portion of the City of Broadmeadows. According to the 2011 Census the City of Moreland has a population of 147,241. Moreland City Council is the governing body for the City of Moreland. The Council consists of more than 1,000 employees spread across 22 different locations. Moreland City Council prides themselves on their focus to continuously serve the residents of the City of Moreland and improve the level of service that they receive. The Challenge Moreland City Council identified a single point of failure within the Payroll and Finance departments. Printing Cheques and Payslips, two of the Council’s more important printing requirements, was totally dependent on the software installed on one printing device. “We needed to remove our dependence on the physical print device and implement a more robust, configurable and scalable backend solution that provided greater benefits and reduced risk to Council,” stated Bernard Hoehmann, Moreland City Council’s IT Project Manager. +61 1300 378 836 (Australia) | +44 203 355 1237 (UK) +1 213 291 0523 (USA) | +63 2 817 4901 (Philippines) [email protected] | www.redmap.com 1 smartOutput - Moreland City Council Case Study The Solution “Redmap provided Council with greater control over our Moreland City Council chose to implement Redmap cheque and payslip printing based on cost, vendor experience and the software’s fit requirements.
    [Show full text]