DOCSLIB.ORG

Covariant Thermodynamics & Relativity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Covariant Thermodynamics & Relativity UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON Faculty of Social & Human Sciences School of Mathematics Covariant Thermodynamics & Relativity by C´esarSim´onL´opez-Monsalvo arXiv:1107.1005v1 [gr-qc] 6 Jul 2011 Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy March 2011 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF SOCIAL AND HUMAN SCIENCES SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICS Doctor of Philosophy COVARIANT THERMODYNAMICS AND RELATIVITY by C´esarSim´onL´opez-Monsalvo This thesis deals with the dynamics of irreversible processes within the context of the general theory of relativity. In particular, we address the problem of the ‘infinite’ speed of propagation of thermal disturbances in a dissipative fluid. Although this problem is not new, its best known solution - the Israel and Stewart second order expansion - has an effective, rather than fundamental, character. The present work builds on the multi-fluid variational approach to relativistic dissipation, pioneered by Carter, and provides a dynamical theory of heat conduction. The novel property of such approach is the thermodynamic interpretation associated with a two-fluid system whose constituents are matter and entropy. The dynamics of this model leads to a relativistic generalisation of the Cattaneo equation; the constitutive relation for causal heat transport. A comparison with the Israel and Stewart model is presented and its equivalence is shown. This discussion provides new insights into the not-well understood definition of a non-equilibrium temperature. A crucial feature of the multi-fluid approach is the interaction between its constituents. It is a well known fact that when two, or more, fluids interact, instabilities may occur. Within this work, the two-stream instability analysis is extended to the relativistic domain. As far as the author is aware, such extension has not been discussed in the literature. The analysis allows to assess the stability and causality of relativistic models of matter and their linear deviations from thermodynamic equilibrium directly from their equations of state or, equivalently, their Lagrangian densities. For completeness, a brief digression on a consistent (stable and causal) ‘first-order’ model is also included. Finally, the road to follow is laid by posing some physical applications together with some future perspectives and closing remarks. To sum up, the variational approach to heat conduction presented in this thesis consti- tutes a mathematically promising formalism to explore the relativistic evolution towards equilibrium of dissipative fluids in a dynamical manner and to get a deeper conceptual understanding of non-equilibrium thermodynamic quantities. Moreover, it might also be useful to explore the more fundamental issues of the irreversible dynamics of relativity and its connections with the time asymmetry of nature. i Contents Abstract i Contents ii List of figures v Declaration of authorship vi Acknowledgements vii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 The empirical nature of Thermodynamics . 2 1.2 Historical problems of relativistic heat conduction . 5 1.3 The multi-fluid approach to thermal dynamics . 7 1.4 The state of the art . 10 2 Relativity and Thermodynamics 12 2.1 Spacetime and matter . 12 2.1.1 The principles of relativity . 13 2.1.2 The symmetry of general relativity . 15 2.1.3 Equations of motion . 17 2.2 Irreversible processes . 22 2.2.1 Equilibrium thermodynamics . 23 2.2.2 Linear Irreversible Thermodynamics . 26 2.2.3 Extended Irreversible Thermodynamics . 32 2.3 Irreversible processes in general relativity . 34 ii Contents 3 Relativistic kinetic theory 36 3.1 Symplectic structure of phase space . 36 3.1.1 Forms and motion . 39 3.1.2 Volume elements . 44 3.1.3 Individual mass-shell volume measure . 45 3.2 Boltzmann's equation . 46 3.3 Entropy . 47 3.3.1 H-theorem . 51 3.4 Macroscopic fluid equations . 54 3.4.1 Thermal equilibrium and the Tolman-Ehrenfest effect . 56 3.4.2 Deviations from thermal equilibrium . 58 4 Relativistic theories of dissipation 60 4.1 First-order theories . 61 4.1.1 Eckart's model . 62 4.1.2 Landau & Lifshitz theory . 67 4.2 Second-order theories . 67 4.2.1 The Israel & Stewart second-order theory . 68 4.2.2 Carter's theory of dissipation . 72 5 Variational thermal dynamics 76 5.1 Convective construction . 77 5.1.1 Lagrangian and Eulerian variations . 80 5.1.2 Eulerian variation of conserved currents . 83 5.2 The two-fluids action principle . 84 5.2.1 The unconstrained variation . 85 5.2.2 The constrained variation . 88 5.3 Thermodynamic interpretation . 91 5.3.1 The temperature problem . 92 5.4 Rheometric covariant thermodynamics . 94 5.4.1 Internal dynamics: the relativistic Cattaneo equation . 96 5.4.2 Further remarks on the internal thermal dynamics . 100 5.4.3 Equivalence with Israel & Stewart . 102 5.4.4 Covariance and entropy production: an electrodynamic analogue . 104 6 Adiabatic perturbations 106 6.1 Linear perturbations of thermal equilibrium . 107 6.2 Sound waves in a single fluid . 110 iii Contents 6.3 Sound waves in the matter and entropy system . 114 6.3.1 The completely decoupled case . 118 6.3.2 Cross-constituent coupling . 119 6.3.3 The role of entrainment . 122 7 Non-adiabatic perturbations 129 7.1 Transverse modes: first stability criterion . 130 7.2 Longitudinal modes: causality and the onset of instability . 132 7.3 What have we learned? . 137 8 Closing remarks 139 8.1 Further developments . 140 8.1.1 Microscopic foundations of relativistic thermal dynamics . 140 8.1.2 The `near' and `far' from equilibrium entropy conditions . 143 8.1.3 Classical origins of the arrow of time . 144 8.2 Conclusion . 145 A Regular and Anomalous Heat Conduction 147 Glossary 150 Bibliography 150 iv List of figures 2.1 This figure shows a comparison of the evolution of a thermal disturbance modelled with the heat (left) and telegrapher (right) equations. The vertical axis represents time, while the horizontal corresponds to one-dimensional space. The initial condition is a delta function at the origin of the spatial direction. The evolution occurs towards the top of the page. We can see that, for the heat equation, the pulse spreads over the entire region without any lag. On the contrary, the evolution provided by the telegraph equation propagates a thermal signal which dissipates away to merge the long term solution of the heat equation (the transition between `fast' and `slow' heat flux). The bottom graph shows a how the two distinct evolutions become indistinguishable in the `long' run. Here, the `z'-axis corresponds to tem- perature, while the spatial and temporal directions should be obvious from the description of the top images. 33 6.1 Plots of the real (top) and imaginary (bottom) parts of the mode frequencies 2 σn as functions of w, for cs = 0:5, b = 1:0, and βns = 0. The merger of two frequencies, and subsequent non-zero imaginary parts, signal the presence of a two-stream instability. 123 6.2 Plots of the real and imaginary parts of the mode frequencies σn as functions \2 2 of y and C , for cs = 0:5, and b = 1:0. The lines of intersection and subsequent merger of two frequencies signal the presence of a two-stream instability. 128 8.1 Gravity and entropy production: What can our intuition tell us about the future of this initial configuration? [This image is property of Steve Strawn, splutphoto.com] ..................................146 v Declaration of authorship I, C´esarSim´onL´opez-Monsalvo, declare that the thesis entitled: Covariant Thermodynamics and Relativity, and the work presented in the thesis are both my own, and have been generated by me as the result of my own original research. I confirm that: • this work was done wholly or mainly while in candidature for a research degree at this University; • where any part of this thesis has previously been submitted for a degree or any other qualification at this University or any other institution, this has been clearly stated; • where I have consulted the published work of others, this is always clearly attributed; • where I have quoted from the work of others, the source is always given. With the exception of such quotations, this thesis is entirely my own work; • I have acknowledged all main sources of help; • where the thesis is based on work done by myself jointly with others, I have made clear exactly what was done by others and what I have contributed myself; • parts of this work have been published as: 1. C. S. Lopez-Monsalvo and N. Andersson, Thermal Dynamics in General Relativity, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 467:738759, March 2011. arXiv:1006.2978v1 [gr-qc]. 2. L. Samuelsson, C. S. Lopez-Monsalvo, N. Andersson and G. Comer, Relativistic two- stream instability, Gen. Rel. Grav. 42, 413-433, 2010. arXiv:0906.4002v1 [gr-qc]. 3. C. S. Lopez-Monsalvo, Heat conduction in relativistic systems: alternatives and per- spectives, In IoP Gravitational Physics Group newsletter December 2010. arXiv:1011.6628 [gr-qc]. Date: Signed: vi Acknowledgements Although immensely rewarding, the path of science - I believe - is hardly ever smooth. In this work, I had the fortune to be assisted by two truly inspirational guides. I am greatly indebted to Nils Andersson, whose helpful advice always arrived with incisive clarity. He has contributed more than anyone to direct my brief explorations on thermodynamics and relativity. I am also thankful to James Vickers for sharing with me a little bit of his mathematical sophistication. Even his tiniest contribution always showed me a clearer way. To both of them, all my admiration. However, should the reader find errors and imprecisions in this work, those are the sole consequence of my own misconceptions. I would like to thank in advance my examiners: Ian Hawke and David Matravers, for the time and effort spent reading this thesis.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Arrow of Time Volume 7 Paul Davies Summer 2014 Beyond Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science, Arizona State University, Journal Homepage P.O
    The arrow of time Volume 7 Paul Davies Summer 2014 Beyond Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science, Arizona State University, journal homepage P.O. Box 871504, Tempe, AZ 852871504, USA. www.euresisjournal.org [email protected] Abstract The arrow of time is often conflated with the popular but hopelessly muddled concept of the “flow” or \passage" of time. I argue that the latter is at best an illusion with its roots in neuroscience, at worst a meaningless concept. However, what is beyond dispute is that physical states of the universe evolve in time with an objective and readily-observable directionality. The ultimate origin of this asymmetry in time, which is most famously captured by the second law of thermodynamics and the irreversible rise of entropy, rests with cosmology and the state of the universe at its origin. I trace the various physical processes that contribute to the growth of entropy, and conclude that gravitation holds the key to providing a comprehensive explanation of the elusive arrow. 1. Time's arrow versus the flow of time The subject of time's arrow is bedeviled by ambiguous or poor terminology and the con- flation of concepts. Therefore I shall begin my essay by carefully defining terms. First an uncontentious statement: the states of the physical universe are observed to be distributed asymmetrically with respect to the time dimension (see, for example, Refs. [1, 2, 3, 4]). A simple example is provided by an earthquake: the ground shakes and buildings fall down. We would not expect to see the reverse sequence, in which shaking ground results in the assembly of a building from a heap of rubble.
    [Show full text]
  • Chaos, Dissipation, Arrow of Time, in Quantum Physics I the National Institute of Standards and Technology Was Established in 1988 by Congress to "Assist
    Chaos, Dissipation, Arrow of Time, in Quantum Physics i The National Institute of Standards and Technology was established in 1988 by Congress to "assist industry in the development of technology . needed to improve product quality, to modernize manufacturing processes, to ensure product reliability . and to facilitate rapid commercialization . of products based on new scientific discoveries." NIST, originally founded as the National Bureau of Standards in 1901, works to strengthen U.S. industry's competitiveness; advance science and engineering; and improve public health, safety, and the environment. One of the agency's basic functions is to develop, maintain, and retain custody of the national standards of measurement, and provide the means and methods for comparing standards used in science, engineering, manufacturing, commerce, industry, and education with the standards adopted or recognized by the Federal Government. As an agency of the U.S. Commerce Department's Technology Administration, NIST conducts basic and applied research in the physical sciences and engineering and performs related services. The Institute does generic and precompetitive work on new and advanced technologies. NIST's research facilities are located at Gaithersburg, MD 20899, and at Boulder, CO 80303. Major technical operating units and their principal activities are listed below. For more information contact the Public Inquiries Desk, 301-975-3058. Technology Services Manufacturing Engineering Laboratory • Manufacturing Technology Centers Program • Precision
    [Show full text]
  • In the Experiments in Which Alpha-Activity Was Measured Using Collimators Directed at East and West
    Volume 1 PROGRESS IN PHYSICS January, 2010 “The Arrow of Time” in the Experiments in which Alpha-Activity was Measured Using Collimators Directed at East and West Simon E. Shnoll, Ilya A. Rubinsteiny, and Nikolai N. Vedenkiny Department of Physics, Moscow State University, Moscow 119992, Russia Inst. of Theor. and Experim. Biophysics, Russian Acad. of Sci., Pushchino, Moscow Region, 142290, Russia Puschino State University, Prospect Nauki 3, Pushchino, Moscow Region, 142290, Russia ySkobeltsin’s Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia E-mail: [email protected] In our previous paper (Shnoll and Rubinstein, Progress in Physics, 2009, v. 2, 83–95), we briefly reported about a phenomenon, which can be called the “arrow of time”: when we compared histograms constructed from the results of 239-Pu alpha-activity measurements that were obtained using West- and East-directed collimators, daytime series of the “eastern” histograms were similar to the inverted series of the following night, whereas daytime series of the “western” histograms resembled the inverted series of the preceding night. Here we consider this phenomenon in more detail. 1 Introduction As follows from all our past results, the fine structure of the spectrum of amplitude fluctuations (the shape of the corre- sponding histograms) is determined by the motion (orienta- tion) of the object studied (the laboratory) in relation to spa- tial inhomogeneities [2]. The spatial pattern (arrangement in space) of these inhomogeneities is stable: as the Earth ro- tates about its axis and moves along the circumsolar orbit, similar histogram shapes are realized repeatedly with the cor- responding periods (daily, near-monthly, yearly) [3, 4].
    [Show full text]
  • The Deadly Affairs of John Figaro Newton Or a Senseless Appeal to Reason and an Elegy for the Dreaming
    The deadly affairs of John Figaro Newton or a senseless appeal to reason and an elegy for the dreaming Item Type Thesis Authors Campbell, Regan Download date 26/09/2021 19:18:08 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/11260 THE DEADLY AFFAIRS OF JOHN FIGARO NEWTON OR A SENSELESS APPEAL TO REASON AND AN ELEGY FOR THE DREAMING By Regan Campbell, B.F.A. A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Fine Arts in Creative Writing University of Alaska Fairbanks May 2020 APPROVED: Daryl Farmer, Committee Chair Leonard Kamerling, Committee Member Chris Coffman, Committee Member Rich Carr, Chair Department of English Todd Sherman, Dean College of Liberal Arts Michael Castellini, Dean of the Graduate School Abstract Are you really you? Are your memories true? John “Fig” Newton thinks much the same as you do. But in three separate episodes of his life, he comes to see things are a little more strange and less straightforward than everyone around him has been inured to the point of pretending they are; maybe it's all some kind of bizarre form of torture for someone with the misfortune of assuming they embody a real and actual person. Whatever the case, Fig is sure he can't trust that truth exists, and over the course of his many doomed relationships and professional foibles, he continually strives to find another like him—someone incandescent with rage, and preferably, as insane and beautiful as he. i Extracts “Whose blood do you still thirst for? But sacred philosophy will shackle your success, for whatsoever may be your momentary triumph or the disorder of this anarchy, you will never govern enlightened men.
    [Show full text]
  • 110508NU-Ep511-Yellow Script
    “Arrow of Time” #511/Ep. 90 Written by Ken Sanzel Directed by Ken Sanzel Production Draft – 10/17/08 Rev. FULL Blue – 10/30/08 Rev. Pink – 11/4/08 Rev. Yellow – 11/5/08 (Pages: 41,46,50,55.) SCOTT FREE in association with CBS PARAMOUNT NETWORK TELEVISION, a division of CBS Studios. © Copyright 2008 CBS Paramount Network Television. All Rights Reserved. This script is the property of CBS Paramount Network Television and may not be copied or distributed without the express written permission of CBS Paramount Network Television. This copy of the script remains the property of CBS Paramount Network Television. It may not be sold or transferred and must be returned to: CBS Paramount Network Television Legal Affairs 4024 Radford Avenue Administration Bldg., Suite 390, Studio City, CA 91604 THE WRITING CREDITS MAY OR MAY NOT BE FINAL AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR PUBLICITY OR ADVERTISING PURPOSES WITHOUT FIRST CHECKING WITH TELEVISION LEGAL DEPARTMENT. “Arrow of Time” Ep. #511 – Production Draft: Rev. Yellow – 11/5/08 SCRIPT REVISION HISTORY COLOR DATE PAGES WHITE 10/17/08 (1-57) REV. FULL BLUE 10/30/08 (1-57) REV. PINK 11/4/08 (2,3,4,6,7,18,19,20,27,33, 34,39,41,42,49,50,51,55.) REV. YELLOW 11/5/08 (41,46,50,55.) “Arrow of Time” Ep. #511 – Production Draft: Rev. FULL Blue – 10/30/08 CAST LIST DON EPPES CHARLIE EPPES ALAN EPPES DAVID SINCLAIR LARRY FLEINHARDT AMITA RAMANUJAN COLBY GRANGER NIKKI BETANCOURT LIZ WARNER ROBIN BROOKS BUCK WINTERS RAFE LANSKY GRAY McCLAUGHLIN JOE THIBODEAUX * DEANNE DRAKE TOBY TIM PYNCHON SECOND MARSHAL “Arrow of Time” Ep.
    [Show full text]
  • Seeing the Arrow of Time
    Seeing the Arrow of Time Lyndsey C. Pickup1 Zheng Pan2 Donglai Wei3 YiChang Shih3 Changshui Zhang2 Andrew Zisserman1 Bernhard Scholkopf¨ 4 William T. Freeman3 1Visual Geometry Group, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford. 2Department of Automation, Tsinghua University State Key Lab of Intelligent Technologies and Systems, Tsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology (TNList). 3Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 4Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tubingen.¨ Abstract itself visually. This is a fundamental property of the visual world that we should understand. Thus we ask the question: We explore whether we can observe Time’s Arrow in a can we see the Arrow of Time? – can we distinguish a video temporal sequence–is it possible to tell whether a video is playing forward from one playing backward? running forwards or backwards? We investigate this some- Here, we seek to use low-level visual information – what philosophical question using computer vision and ma- closer to the underlying physics – to see Time’s Arrow, not chine learning techniques. object-level visual cues. We are not interested in memoriz- We explore three methods by which we might detect ing that cars tend to drive forward, but rather in studying the Time’s Arrow in video sequences, based on distinct ways common temporal structure of images. We expect that such in which motion in video sequences might be asymmetric regularities will make the problem amenable to a learning- in time. We demonstrate good video forwards/backwards based approach. Some sequences will be difficult or im- classification results on a selection of YouTube video clips, possible; others may be straightforward.
    [Show full text]
  • Seeing the Arrow of Time
    Seeing the Arrow of Time Lyndsey C. Pickup1 Zheng Pan2 Donglai Wei3 YiChang Shih3 Changshui Zhang2 Andrew Zisserman1 Bernhard Scholkopf¨ 4 William T. Freeman3 1Visual Geometry Group, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford. 2Department of Automation, Tsinghua University State Key Lab of Intelligent Technologies and Systems, Tsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology (TNList). 3Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 4Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tubingen.¨ Abstract itself visually. This is a fundamental property of the visual world that we should understand. Thus we ask the question: We explore whether we can observe Time’s Arrow in a can we see the Arrow of Time? – can we distinguish a video temporal sequence–is it possible to tell whether a video is playing forward from one playing backward? running forwards or backwards? We investigate this some- Here, we seek to use low-level visual information – what philosophical question using computer vision and ma- closer to the underlying physics – to see Time’s Arrow, not chine learning techniques. object-level visual cues. We are not interested in memoriz- We explore three methods by which we might detect ing that cars tend to drive forward, but rather in studying the Time’s Arrow in video sequences, based on distinct ways common temporal structure of images. We expect that such in which motion in video sequences might be asymmetric regularities will make the problem amenable to a learning- in time. We demonstrate good video forwards/backwards based approach. Some sequences will be difficult or im- classification results on a selection of YouTube video clips, possible; others may be straightforward.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Arrow of Time' Solution Stirs up Old Issues Sense of Well--Being Tied To
    ~ 1 ~7'f 'Arrow of time' solution stirs up old issues Ilya Prigogine's new formulation of physics, as reported in our last issue, This issue (June/July) contains has generated a strong response­ 12 pages rather than eight in order mostly favorable-from many quarters to do justice to the torrent of reac­ and stimulated a host of questions. tion to Ilya Prigogine's recent Some of the reaction is summarized work (May issue). The August in this issue; some is reprinted in the Brain/Mind will also be a 12- Commentary and a four-page special pager. For extra copies of this insert, with additional comments to issue, call (800) 553-MIND or I appear in future issues. (213) 223-2500. Prigogine's reformulation addresses the question of the "arrow of time," a ciplines such as biology and geology problem that has made science schizo­ take time into consideration. Physicists A BULLETIN Of BREAKTHROUGHS phrenic. are indeed able to show this "time­ According to physics, time is irrele­ symmetry" experimentally, but Prigo­ June/ July 1994 Volume 19, Numbers 9/10 vant-even reversible-whereas dis- gine says these are special cases involving isolated points. More from Tucson An "ensemble of points" behaves differently, however. Resonance Microtubules link mind, physics among the points creates genuine nov­ Perhaps the hottest topic of the around cells, dissolving and re-forming elty. After working on the problem for recent consciousness conference in in other places. many years, Prigogine expressed Tucson (Brain/Mind, April) was the Microtubule networks serve as a mathematically our common-sense ex­ potential relation- sort of skeleton for a cell, lending it perience of a forward movement of ship between con- structure and creating pathways for events.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Time - Stephen Hawking
    A Brief History of Time - Stephen Hawking Chapter 1 - Our Picture of the Universe Chapter 2 - Space and Time Chapter 3 - The Expanding Universe Chapter 4 - The Uncertainty Principle Chapter 5 - Elementary Particles and the Forces of Nature Chapter 6 - Black Holes Chapter 7 - Black Holes Ain't So Black Chapter 8 - The Origin and Fate of the Universe Chapter 9 - The Arrow of Time Chapter 10 - Wormholes and Time Travel Chapter 11 - The Unification of Physics Chapter 12 - Conclusion Glossary Acknowledgments & About The Author FOREWARD I didn’t write a foreword to the original edition of A Brief History of Time. That was done by Carl Sagan. Instead, I wrote a short piece titled “Acknowledgments” in which I was advised to thank everyone. Some of the foundations that had given me support weren’t too pleased to have been mentioned, however, because it led to a great increase in applications. I don’t think anyone, my publishers, my agent, or myself, expected the book to do anything like as well as it did. It was in the London Sunday Times best-seller list for 237 weeks, longer than any other book (apparently, the Bible and Shakespeare aren’t counted). It has been translated into something like forty languages and has sold about one copy for every 750 men, women, and children in the world. As Nathan Myhrvold of Microsoft (a former post-doc of mine) remarked: I have sold more books on physics than Madonna has on sex. The success of A Brief History indicates that there is widespread interest in the big questions like: Where did we come from? And why is the universe the way it is? I have taken the opportunity to update the book and include new theoretical and observational results obtained since the book was first published (on April Fools’ Day, 1988).
    [Show full text]
  • A New Cosmology of a Crystallization Process (Decoherence)
    1 A new cosmology of a crystallization process (decoherence) from the surrounding quantum soup provides heuristics to unify general relativity and quantum physics by solid state physics T. Dandekar, Bioinformatik, Biozentrum, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany Abstract We explore a cosmology where the Big Bang singularity is replaced by a condensation event of interacting strings. We study the transition from an uncontrolled, chaotic soup (“before”) to a clearly interacting “real world”. Cosmological inflation scenarios do not fit current observations and are avoided. Instead, long-range interactions inside this crystallization event limit growth and crystal symmetries ensure the same laws of nature and basic symmetries over our domain. Tiny mis-arrangements present nuclei of superclusters and galaxies and crystal structure leads to the arrangement of dark (halo regions) and normal matter (galaxy nuclei) so convenient for galaxy formation. Crystals come and go, allowing an evolutionary cosmology where entropic forces from the quantum soup “outside” of the crystal try to dissolve it. These would correspond to dark energy and leads to a big rip scenario in 70 Gy. Preference of crystals with optimal growth and most condensation nuclei for the next generation of crystals may select for multiple self-organizing processes within the crystal, explaining “fine-tuning” of the local “laws of nature” (the symmetry relations formed within the crystal, its “unit cell”) to be particular favorable for self-organizing processes including life or even conscious observers in our universe. Independent of cosmology, a crystallization event may explain quantum-decoherence in general: The fact, that in our macroscopic everyday world we only see one reality.
    [Show full text]
  • Life, Information, Entropy, and Time
    Life, information, entropy, and time Antony R. Crofts Department of Biochemistry, 419 Roger Adams Laboratory, 600 S. Mathews Avenue, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana IL 61801 Phone: (217) 333-2043 Fax: (217) 244-6615 e-mail: [email protected] This is a preprint of an article accepted for publication in Complexity © (2006) (copyright John Wiley and Sons, Inc.) Summary. Attempts to understand how information content can be included in an accounting of the energy flux of the biosphere have led to the conclusion that, in information transmission, one component, the semantic content, or ‘the meaning of the message’, adds no thermodynamic burden over and above costs arising from coding, transmission and translation. In biology, semantic content has two major roles. For all life forms, the message of the genotype encoded in DNA specifies the phenotype, and hence the organism that is tested against the real world through the mechanisms of Darwinian evolution. For human beings, communication through language and similar abstractions provides an additional supra-phenotypic vehicle for semantic inheritance, which supports the cultural heritages around which civilizations revolve. The following three postulates provide the basis for discussion of a number of themes that demonstrate some important consequences. i) Information transmission through either pathway has thermodynamic components associated with data storage and transmission. ii) The semantic content adds no additional thermodynamic cost. iii) For all semantic exchange, meaning is accessible only through translation and interpretation, and has a value only in context. 1. For both pathways of semantic inheritance, translational and copying machineries are imperfect. As a consequence both pathways are subject to mutation, and to evolutionary pressure by selection.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arrow of Time in Physics DAVID WALLACE
    16 The Arrow of Time in Physics DAVID WALLACE 1. Introduction Essentially, any process in physics can be described as a sequence of physical states of the system in question, indexed by times. Some such processes, even at the macroscopic, everyday level, do not appear in themselves to pick out any difference between past and future: the sequence run backwards is as legitimate a physical process as the original. Consider, for instance, a highly elastic ball bouncing back and forth, or the orbits of the planets. If these processes – in isolation – were fi lmed and played to an audience both forwards and backwards, there would be no way for the audience to know which was which. But most physical processes are not like that. The decay of radioactive elements, the melting of ice in a glass of water, the emission of light by a hot object, the slowing down by friction of a moving object, nuclear or chemical reactions . each of these pro- cesses seems to have a direction to it. None of them, run backwards, is a physical process that we observe in nature; any of them, if fi lmed and played backwards, could easily be identifi ed as incorrect. 1 In the standard terminology, these processes defi ne arrows of time . So: some physical processes are undirected in time, but most are directed. So what? The problem is that among the physical processes that seem to be undirected in time (at least, so it seems) are essentially all the processes that govern fundamental physics. Yet we have strong reasons to think that the equations that govern larger-scale physical processes are somehow derivative on, or determined by, those that govern fundamental physics.
    [Show full text]