Biodiversity of Demersal Fish Along the Estuarine - Shelf Regions of Goa

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biodiversity of Demersal Fish Along the Estuarine - Shelf Regions of Goa Biodiversity of demersal fish along the estuarine - shelf regions of Goa Thesis submitted to Goa University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Marine Sciences 53 7 By 7 7 D I Vinay P. Padate Department of Marine Sciences Goa University, Goa - 403 206, INDIA October, 2010 5'2G Dedicated to Late Shri (Dr) Kethavrao Yoshi Statement As required by the University ordinance 0.19.8 (vi), I state that the present thesis entitled "Biodiversity of demersal fish along the estuarine — shelf regions of Goa" is my original contribution and the same has not been submitted on any previous occasion. To the best of my knowledge the present study is the first comprehensive work of its kind from the area mentioned. The literature related to the problem investigated has been cited. Due acknowledgements have been made wherever facilities and suggestions have been availed of. Vinay P. Padate Certificate This is to certify that the thesis entitled "Biodiversity of demersal fish along the estuarine — shelf regions of Goa", submitted by Mr. Vinay P. Padate for the award of Doctor of Philosophy in Marine Sciences is based on his original studies carried out by him under my supervision. The thesis or any part thereof has not been previously submitted for any degree or diploma in any Universities or • Institutions. Dr. C.U. • ivonker Research Guide Associate Professor Department of Marine Sciences Goa University Taleigao Plateau, 403 206, Goa Ai I t•K& carr'eafrow) sw-jog*__ce .4-e-r6'e4 eczAAd)rbitP3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express a deep sense of gratitude to my guide, Dr. C.U. Rivonker, for giving me an opportunity to work on a unique research problem under his able guidance. I would like to express my gratitude to the Head, Department of Marine Sciences and members of the FRC for their timely suggestions. Further, thanks are due to the Director, National Institute of Oceanography, Goa for allowing me to participate in the Ballast water Project which has been funded by the Directorate General of Shipping, Government of India. I am highly indebted to Dr. A.C. Anil, Senior Scientist, MCMRD, NIO and coordinator of the project for the timely discussions that enhanced my scientific aptitude. I would always be indebted to Dr. S.S. Sawant, Senior Scientist, NIO for his help and support. I convey my gratitude to Mr. K. Venkat, Senior Technical Officer, NIO for extending technical assistance, Dr. Dattesh Desai, Scientist, NIO and Dr. Lidita Khandeparker, Scientist, NIO for their help in the DNA sequencing. I am also indebted to Mr V. Khedekar, Senior Technical Officer, GOD, NIO for the Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) photography of the crab specimens. The help extended by Dr. M.P. Tapaswi, Documentation Officer, NIO in obtaining the references from different places is gratefully acknowledged. I also take this opportunity to express my deep gratitude to Dr. B.F. Chhapgar, an eminent carcinologist for his valuable suggestions in confirming the identity of the newly described species. Further, I acknowledge Dr. Mark Siddall, Curator at the American Museum of Natural History, New York for his timely help in providing Charybdis philippinensis specimens on loan for reference purpose. I thank the anonymous reviewers for the constructive criticism that enhanced the quality of the published papers. I would whole — heartedly thank my colleagues Nutan and Tomchou for teaching me the intricacies of data handling, processing and presentation, Vineel for the artwork techniques, Mahabaleshwar and Ganesh for their help extended during my stay at the Department. A special thanks to my colleagues at the MCMRD, NIO (Dhiraj, Rajat, Amar, Kirti, Lalita and Vinayak) for extending help during my work at the NIO. Finally, I take this opportunity to thank my close friends at the University, Shivraj, Santosh, Sweety, Shilpa, Renosh and Milind for supporting me during the study period. I would also like to thank the non — teaching staff of the Department of Marine Sciences for extending me all the help during my laboratory work. I wish to specially thank the fishing crew of the "Jesus Bless" trawler for allowing me to collect fish samples. I wish to express deep sense of gratitude to Shri. Dada Samant, Smt. Suvarna Teli, Shri. Prashant Padate and Shri. Satish Yedve for their blessings and support for my endeavour. I would also take this opportunity to specially thank Dr. Subodh Sawant for his kind support and encouragement. I make a special mention of my mother Late Mrs. Vandana Padate, whose memory has been the sole source of inspiration on my path to seek knowledge and my parents, Mr. Pandharinath and Mrs. Yamini Padate for their blessings, without which this endeavour would not have materialized. Vinay Padate CONTENTS Page No. List of Tables i — ii List of Figures iii — vi Chapter 1. General Introduction 1 1.1. Background information 1 1.2. Literature review 2 1.3. Objectives 6 Chapter 2. Materials and Methods 7 2.1. Study area 7 2.2. Sample collection 9 2.3. Taxonomic identification and morphometry 11 2.4. Sample preservation 12 2.5. 18S rDNA sequencing 12 2.6. Data compilation and processing 13 2.6.1. Faunal composition 13 2.6.2. Faunal abundance (numbers) and weight 13 2.6.3. Species diversity indices 14 2.6.3a. Shannon — Wiener's diversity index 14 2.6.3b. Heip's evenness index 15 2.6.3c. Margalefs species richness 15 2.6.3d. Simpson's dominance index 15 2.6.4. Cluster analysis 16 2.6.5. Functional guilds 16 2.6.6. Determination of catch rate 17 Chapter 3. Demersal faunal community structure off Goa 18 3.1. Introduction 18 3.2. Literature review 18 3.3. Results 22 3.3.1. Species composition 22 3.3.2. New records for the study area 23 3.3.3. Quantitative analysis 23 3.3.3 a. Overall data 23 3.3.3b. Crustaceans 26 3.3.3c. Fin fish 29 3.3.3d. Molluscs 36 3.3.3e. Other fauna 38 3.3.3f. Coastal residents and migrants 39 3.3.3g. Diversity 39 3.3.4. Faunal associations 41 3.3.4a. Family level 41 3.3.4b. Family level: pre — monsoon season 41 3.3.4c. Family level: post — monsoon season 42 3.3.4d. Species level 43 3.3.4e. Species level: pre — monsoon season 43 3.3.4f. Species level: post — monsoon season 44 3.3.5. Catch rates of the study area 45 3.4. Discussion 46 3.5. Conclusion 61 Chapter 4. Description of Charybdis (Charybdis) goaensis, new species 62 4.1. Introduction 62 4.2. Literature review 62 4.3. Taxonomy 65 4.3.1. Family Portunidae Rafinesque — Schmaltz, 1815 65 4.3.2. Subfamily Thalamitinae Paul'son, 1875 66 4.3.3. Genus Charybdis De Haan, 1833 66 4.3.4. Charybdis (Charybdis) goaensis sp. nov. 67 4.3.4a. Material examined 67 4.3.4b. Diagnosis 67 4.3.4c. Description 68 4.3.4d. Colour 71 4.3.4e. Etymology 71 4.3.4f. Distribution 71 4.3.4g. Habitat characteristics 71 4.3.4h. Habit 72 4.3.4i. Remarks 72 4.3.5. Charybdis (Charybdis) philippinensis Ward, 1941 74 4.3.5a. Original description by Ward (1941) 74 4.3.5b. Updated description of type specimens — C. philippinensis 76 4.3.6. Key to the species of swimming crabs of the sub — genus Charybdis 78 4.4. Conclusion 87 Chapter 5. A new record of Caesio cuning outside its known geographical array 88 5.1. Introduction 88 5.2. Literature review 88 5.3. Taxonomy 89 5.3.1. Family Caesionidae 89 5.3.2. Genus Caesio Lacepede, 1801 (Carpenter, 1988) 90 5.3.3. Caesio cuning (Bloch, 1791) . 90 5.3.3a. Material examined 90 5.3.3b. Description 91 5.4. Discussion 92 5.5. Conclusion 96 Chapter 6. A new record of Scylla olivacea from Goa — A comparative diagnosis 97 6.1. Introduction 97 6.2. Literature review 97 6.3. Taxonomy 102 6.3.1. Morph 1 103 6.3.1a. Material examined 103 6.3.1b. Description 103 6.3.2. Scylla olivacea (Herbst, 1796) description by Keenan et al. (1998) 105 6.3.3. Morph 2 105 6.3.3a. Material examined 105 6.3.3b. Description 106 6.3.4. Statistical analysis 108 6.3.5. DNA sequencing 108 6.3.6. Geographical distribution of Scylla olivacea 108 6.4. Conclusion 109 Chapter 7. Puffer fish diversity off Goa 110 7.1. Introduction 110 7.2. Literature review 110 7.3. Taxonomy 111 7.3.1. Family Tetraodontidae Fritzsche, 1982 111 7.3.2. Arothron immaculatus (Bloch & Schneider, 1801) 114 7.3.3. Chelonodon patoca (Hamilton, 1822) 115 7.3.4. Lagocephalus spadiceus (Richardson, 1845) 116 7.3.5. Takifugu oblongus (Bloch, 1786) 117 7.3.6. Genus Tetraodon Linnaeus, 1758 118 7.3.7. Tetraodon fluviatilis fluviatilis Hamilton, 1822 121 7.3.7a. Dekkers' (1975) description 121 7.3.7b. Present specimens — comparison with Dekkers' description 122 7.3.7c. DNA sequencing 123 7.4. Discussion 123 7.5. Conclusion 124 Chapter 8. Summary 125 Bibliography 127 Appendix List of Tables Table 2.1. Details of trawl sampling carried out along the potential fishing grounds and bay — estuarine waters of Goa Table 2.2. Details of shore sampling (beach seine and crab trap) carried out along the bay — estuarine waters of Goa Table 2.3. List of meristic counts used in the identification of demersal marine fauna Table 2.4. List of morphometric parameters used in the identification of demersal marine fauna Table 2.5.
Recommended publications
  • Taxonomical Identification and Diversity of Flat Fishes from Mudasalodai Fish Landing Centre (Trawl by Catch), South East Coast of India
    ISSN: 2642-9020 Review Article Journal of Marine Science Research and Oceanography Taxonomical Identification and Diversity of Flat Fishes from Mudasalodai Fish Landing Centre (Trawl by Catch), South East Coast of India Gunalan B* and E Lavanya *Corresponding author B Gunalan, PG & Research Department of Zoology, Thiru Kollanjiyapar PG & Research Department of Zoology, Thiru Kollanjiyapar Government Arts College, Viruthachalam. Cuddalore-Dt, Tamilnadu, India Government Arts College, Viruthachalam Submitted: 31 Jan 2020 Accepted: 05 Feb 2020; Published: 07 Mar 2020 Abstract Bycatch and discards are common and pernicious problems faced by all fisheries globally. It is recognized as unavoidable in any kind of fishing but the quantity varies according to the gear operated. In tropical countries like India, bycatch issue is more complex due to the multi-species and multi-gear nature of the fisheries. Among the different fishing gears, trawling accounts for a higher rate of bycatch, due to comparatively low selectivity of the gear. A study was conducted during June 2018 - Dec 2019 in the Mudasalodai fish landing centre, southeast coast of India. During the study period six sp. of flat fishes collected and identified taxonomically. Keywords: Flat fish, tongue fish, sole fish, bycatch, fish landing, waters of Parangipettai. The study was conducted for a period of diversity, taxonomy one and half year (June 2018 - Dec 2019), no sampling was done in the month of May, due to the fishing holiday in the coast of Introduction Tamil Nadu. The collected flat fishes were kept in ice boxes and Fish forms an important source of food and is man’s important transferred to the laboratory and washed in tap water.
    [Show full text]
  • Annadel Cabanban Emily Capuli Rainer Froese Daniel Pauly
    Biodiversity of Southeast Asian Seas , Palomares and Pauly 15 AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF PHILIPPINE FLATFISHES : ECOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS 1 Annadel Cabanban IUCN Commission on Ecosystem Management, Southeast Asia Dumaguete, Philippines; Email: [email protected] Emily Capuli SeaLifeBase Project, Aquatic Biodiversity Informatics Office Khush Hall, IRRI, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines; Email: [email protected] Rainer Froese IFM-GEOMAR, University of Kiel Duesternbrooker Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany; Email: [email protected] Daniel Pauly The Sea Around Us Project , Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6T 1Z4; Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT An annotated list of the flatfishes of the Philippines was assembled, covering 108 species (vs. 74 in the entire North Atlantic), and thus highlighting this country's feature of being at the center of the world's marine biodiversity. More than 80 recent references relating to Philippine flatfish are assembled. Various biological inferences are drawn from the small sizes typical of Philippine (and tropical) flatfish, and pertinent to the "systems dynamics of flatfish". This was facilitated by FishBase, which documents all data presented here, and which was used to generate the graphs supporting these biological inferences. INTRODUCTION Taxonomy, in its widest sense, is at the root of every scientific discipline, which must first define the objects it studies. Then, the attributes of these objects can be used for various classificatory and/or interpretive schemes; for example, the table of elements in chemistry or evolutionary trees in biology. Fisheries science is no different; here the object of study is a fishery, the interaction between species and certain gears, deployed at certain times in certain places.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on the Larvae of a Few Demersal Fishes of the South West Coast of India
    ,.e;4o2/2 .. STUDIES ON THE LARVAE OF A FEW DEMERSAL FISHES OF THE SOUTH WEST COAST OF INDIA BY M. P. DILEEP. THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DECEMBER 1989. DECLARATION I hereby declare that the thesis entitled Studies on the larvae of a few demersal fishes of the south west coast of India has not previously formed the basis of the award of -r ,3 . fig“ " I similar title or E a i Cochin 16. December, 1989. CERTIFICATE This is to certify that this thesis is an authentic record of the work carried out by Mr. M.P. Dileep under my supervision at the UNDP/FAO/Pelagic Fishery Project, and School of Marine Sciences, Cochin University of Science <3: Technology and that no part thereof has been presented for any other degree in any University. c- """"‘ :­ Prof. (Dr.) C.V. Kurian Emeritus Scientist and Former Professor and Head of the Department of Marine Sciences December,Cochin 16, 1989. University (Supervising of CochinTeacher) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am greatly indebted to Prof. (Dr.) C.V. Kurian, D.Sc., Retired Professor and Head of the Department of Marine Sciences, University of Cochin, for his guidance, criticisms and discussions without which this work would not have been possible. I am grateful to Dr. K.C. George, Scientist, CMFRI for the help and encouragement given during the study. My thanks are due to the authorities of UNDP/FAO/Pelagic Fishery Project Cochin, for making available the materials and laboratory facilities for the work and also to Cochin University of Science and Technology for providing me a Junior Research Fellowship.
    [Show full text]
  • Copepoda: Chondracanthidae) Parasitic on Many-Banded Sole, Zebrias Fasciatus (Pleuronectiformes: Soleidae) from Korea, with a Key to the Species of the Genus
    Ahead of print online version FoliA PArAsitologicA 60 [4]: 365–371, 2013 © institute of Parasitology, Biology centre Ascr issN 0015-5683 (print), issN 1803-6465 (online) http://folia.paru.cas.cz/ A new species of Heterochondria (Copepoda: Chondracanthidae) parasitic on many-banded sole, Zebrias fasciatus (Pleuronectiformes: Soleidae) from Korea, with a key to the species of the genus Seong Yong Moon1,2 and Ho Young Soh2 1 Department of Biology, gangneung-Wonju National University, gangneung, Korea; 2 Division of Marine technology, chonnam National University, Yeosu, Korea Abstract: A new species of chondracanthidae (copepoda: cyclopoida), Heterochondria orientalis sp. n., is described based on specimens of both sexes collected from the gill rakers and the inner side of the operculum of the many-banded sole, Zebrias fasciatus (Basilewsky), from the Yellow sea, Korea. the new species resembles most closely H. zebriae (Ho, Kim et Kuman, 2000), but can be distinguished from this species and other congeners by the shape of the trunk and length of the antenna, the number of teeth on the mandible and the terminal process of the maxilla, and the structure of the male antennule and maxilliped. Heterochondria orientalis is the first copepod species reported fromZ. fasciatus and the first heterochondrid species reported from sole fishes in the Northwest Pacific. A key to distinguish all 10 nominal species of the genus is provided. Keywords: fish parasite, taxonomy, sole fish, parasitic copepod, Korea copepods of the family chondracanthidae Milne Ed- in the laboratory, the parasites were removed from the gill rak- wards, 1840 are ectoparasites of marine fishes (Ho et ers, fixed in 5% formaldehyde and stored in 70% ethanol.
    [Show full text]
  • Training Manual Series No.15/2018
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CMFRI Digital Repository DBTR-H D Indian Council of Agricultural Research Ministry of Science and Technology Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute Department of Biotechnology CMFRI Training Manual Series No.15/2018 Training Manual In the frame work of the project: DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals 2015-18 Training Manual In the frame work of the project: DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals 2015-18 Training Manual This is a limited edition of the CMFRI Training Manual provided to participants of the “DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals” organized by the Marine Biotechnology Division of Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI), from 2nd February 2015 - 31st March 2018. Principal Investigator Dr. P. Vijayagopal Compiled & Edited by Dr. P. Vijayagopal Dr. Reynold Peter Assisted by Aditya Prabhakar Swetha Dhamodharan P V ISBN 978-93-82263-24-1 CMFRI Training Manual Series No.15/2018 Published by Dr A Gopalakrishnan Director, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (ICAR-CMFRI) Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute PB.No:1603, Ernakulam North P.O, Kochi-682018, India. 2 Foreword Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI), Kochi along with CIFE, Mumbai and CIFA, Bhubaneswar within the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and Department of Biotechnology of Government of India organized a series of training programs entitled “DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals”.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Identification of Common Rays
    Field Identification of Rays and Some Common Flatfishes of India Rekha J. Nair 6 Demersal Fisheries Division ORDER Myliobatiformes This suborder includes all of the Eagle Rays (Myliobatidae), Cownose Rays (Rhinopteridae) and the Mobulid Rays and includes about 40 species which are characterized by diamond shaped bodies and wing-like pectoral fins which they use to propel themselves through open water. Eagle Rays and Cownose Rays feed on the seabed, using their mouths to dig amongst the substrate in search of buried molluscs and crustaceans, while the mobulid rays lead a complete pelagic life. The order has 8 families under it. Family Dasyatidae – Whip tail sting rays Dorsal fin totally absent or indistinct if when present. Tail long and whip-like. Most species with at least 1 long venomous spine on tail, which can cause excruciating pain to humans. Dasyatis kuhlii Dasyatis zugei Training Manual on Species Identification Himantura gerrardi Hypolophus sephen Cow tail sting ray A high lower caudal finfold present which is 2 to 3 times depth of tail but not reaching tail tip; no large thorns; 1 or 2 long stings on tail, further behind tail base. Urogymnus asperrimus – Porcupine ray - Protected under Wild Life Act, 1972 Himantura uarnak – Honey comb sting ray Tail with alternating black and white bands, tip mostly pale; skin folds pale at base with dark outer margin, disc with blue dots. Taeniura lymma (Forsskål, 1775) Identification of Common Rays and Flatfishes 89 Training Manual on Species Identification Taeniura meyeni Müller & Henle, 1841 Round ribbon tail ray Black blotches on a grey background Family Gymnuridae – Butterfly rays Disc broad, 1.5 times broader than long Dorsal fin and tail spines present Tail very slender and short (shorter than disc).
    [Show full text]
  • Ketibunder Ecological2008.Pdf
    Disclaimer note This information should be considered accurate as of the date prepared, namely 2007. You acknowledge that this information may change over time and you should not assume that this information is accurate at a later date. WWF-Pakistan and the Royal Netherlands Embassy accept no responsibility for any errors, deviations and omissions in information compiled by independent consultants in this report. Please send comments regarding any errors, inconsistencies, unacknowledged use of source material or any other issue regarding this ecological baseline report as it will help to curate this database. Comments can be submitted to [email protected] Detailed Ecological Assessment Report 2008 – Keti Bunder Table of contents i List of tables vi List of figures viii List of maps and images x List of Acronyms xi List of resource people/consultants xiii Acknowledgement xiv Executive summary xv Chapter 1 Introduction…………………..………………………………… 1 1.1 Introduction to Keti Bunder….……………………………… 2 1.1.1 State of natural resources…………………………………….. 4 1.1.2 Livelihood and social aspects…………………………………. 5 1.2 Rationale and Objectives…………………………………… 6 1.2.1 Large Mammals Survey……………………………………….. 6 1.2.1.1 Rationale………………………………………………………… 6 1.2.1.2 Objectives of the study………………………………………… 7 1.2.2 Small mammal survey…………………………………………. 7 1.2.2.1 Rationale………………………………………………………… 7 1.2.2.2 Objectives of the study………………………………………... 9 1.2.3 Reptiles and amphibians survey……………………………… 10 1.2.3.1 Rationale………………………………………………………… 10 1.2.3.2 Objectives of the study………………………………………... 10 1.2.4 Birds survey…………………………………………………….. 11 1.2.4.1 Rationale………………………………………………………… 11 1.2.4.2 Objectives of the study………………………………………… 11 1.2.5 Marine Fisheries…………………………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • Xiphias Gladius Linnaeus, 1758 Synonyms
    click for previous page - 107 - BONY FISHES XIPHIIDAE Xiphias gladius Linnaeus, 1758 Synonyms : Xiphias estara Phillipps, 1932 Xiphias gladius estara : Whitley, 1968 Loc. names : Ghori (Sin); Asp (Bal) Broadbill swordfish (En) FAO names : En - Swordfish Fr- Espadon Sp - Pez espada Size : Max.: 444 cm (total length); com- mon to 300 cm Fishing gear : Caught with longlines Habitat and biology : Epipelagic, oceanic, sometimes in coastal waters. Highly migratory, does not form schools. Found above the thermocline but also to depths of 800 m. Feeds mainly on schooling fishes, crustaceans and cephalopods Interest to fisheries : The flesh of this species is oily and tasty and appreciated worldwide. The catches of swordfish in Pakistan totalled 200 t in 1983 (see FAO Yearbook of Fishery Statistics, 1983) STROMATEIDAE Loc. names : Achopitho, Sufaid-poplet (Sin); Tighlum, Pithoo, Wanag, etc. (Bal) FAO names: En - Silver pomfrets Fr - Ailerons Sp - Palometones Size : Max.: 60 cm; most common between 20 and 30 cm Fishing gear : Taken with bottom trawls, occasionally with driftnets and bottom gillnets . Main fishing, seasons are January, February, May and September to December along the Baluchistan coast Habitat and biology : Campus argenteus is found in coastal waters from 5 to 100 m depth and it is usually associated with prawns, species of Nemipterus and Leiognathus . Pampus chinensis is found in shallow waters, sometimes in estuaries. They both feed on ctenophores, salps, medusae, etc. Sexually ripe specimens of P. argenteus found in July and October along the Baluchistan coast The Handbook of Fisheries Statistics of Pakistan (1973-83) reports annual catches of Pampus Interest to fisheries : argenteus ranging from 2 694 t (1980) to 6 276 t (1979) with an average of 4 195 t.
    [Show full text]
  • ASFIS ISSCAAP Fish List February 2007 Sorted on Scientific Name
    ASFIS ISSCAAP Fish List Sorted on Scientific Name February 2007 Scientific name English Name French name Spanish Name Code Abalistes stellaris (Bloch & Schneider 1801) Starry triggerfish AJS Abbottina rivularis (Basilewsky 1855) Chinese false gudgeon ABB Ablabys binotatus (Peters 1855) Redskinfish ABW Ablennes hians (Valenciennes 1846) Flat needlefish Orphie plate Agujón sable BAF Aborichthys elongatus Hora 1921 ABE Abralia andamanika Goodrich 1898 BLK Abralia veranyi (Rüppell 1844) Verany's enope squid Encornet de Verany Enoploluria de Verany BLJ Abraliopsis pfefferi (Verany 1837) Pfeffer's enope squid Encornet de Pfeffer Enoploluria de Pfeffer BJF Abramis brama (Linnaeus 1758) Freshwater bream Brème d'eau douce Brema común FBM Abramis spp Freshwater breams nei Brèmes d'eau douce nca Bremas nep FBR Abramites eques (Steindachner 1878) ABQ Abudefduf luridus (Cuvier 1830) Canary damsel AUU Abudefduf saxatilis (Linnaeus 1758) Sergeant-major ABU Abyssobrotula galatheae Nielsen 1977 OAG Abyssocottus elochini Taliev 1955 AEZ Abythites lepidogenys (Smith & Radcliffe 1913) AHD Acanella spp Branched bamboo coral KQL Acanthacaris caeca (A. Milne Edwards 1881) Atlantic deep-sea lobster Langoustine arganelle Cigala de fondo NTK Acanthacaris tenuimana Bate 1888 Prickly deep-sea lobster Langoustine spinuleuse Cigala raspa NHI Acanthalburnus microlepis (De Filippi 1861) Blackbrow bleak AHL Acanthaphritis barbata (Okamura & Kishida 1963) NHT Acantharchus pomotis (Baird 1855) Mud sunfish AKP Acanthaxius caespitosa (Squires 1979) Deepwater mud lobster Langouste
    [Show full text]
  • Check List of Fishes of the Gulf of Mannar Ecosystem, Tamil Nadu, India
    Available online at: www.mbai.org.in doi: 10.6024/jmbai.2016.58.1.1895-05 Check list of fishes of the Gulf of Mannar ecosystem, Tamil Nadu, India K. K. Joshi*, Miriam Paul Sreeram, P. U. Zacharia, E. M. Abdussamad, Molly Varghese, O. M. M. J. Mohammed Habeeb1, K. Jayabalan1, K. P. Kanthan1, K. Kannan1, K. M. Sreekumar, Gimy George and M. S. Varsha ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, P. B. No.1603, Kochi - 682 018, Kerala, India. 1Tuticorin Research Centre of Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Tuticorin - 628 001, Tamil Nadu, India. *Correspondence e-mail: [email protected] Received: 10 Jan 2016, Accepted: 25 Jun 2016, Published: 30 Jun 2016 Original Article Abstract Introduction Gulf of Mannar Ecosystem (GOME) covers an area spread over Rameswaram and Kanyakumari for about 19000 km2 and lies between India is blessed with a vast region of coral reefs and 78°11’E and 79°15’ E longitude and 8°49’N and 9°15’N latitude. The mangroves and these regions support very rich fauna of flora 21 coral islands form a network of habitats for different kinds of fishes and constitute rich biodiversity of marine organisms. Gulf and marine organisms. Fish samples were collected during April 2005 of Mannar Ecosystem (GOME) covers an area spread over to March 2010 from different centers viz., Vembar, Tharuvaikulam, Rameswaram and Kanyakumari to about 19,000 km2. GOME Vellapatti, Therespuram, Tuticorin, Alangarathattu, Pazhaykayal, lies between 78°11’00” E and 79°15’00” E longitude and Punnakayal, Kayalpattinam, Veerapandiapattinam, Thiruchendur and 8°49’00” N and 9°15’00” N latitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Gene Rearrangement and the Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Cynoglossus Monopus: Insights Into the Envolution of the Family Cynoglossidae (Pleuronectiformes)
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Novel Gene Rearrangement and the Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Cynoglossus monopus: Insights into the Envolution of the Family Cynoglossidae (Pleuronectiformes) Chen Wang 1, Hao Chen 2, Silin Tian 1, Cheng Yang 1 and Xiao Chen 1,3,* 1 College of Marine Sciences, South China Agriculture University, Guangzhou 510642, China; [email protected] (C.W.); [email protected] (S.T.); [email protected] (C.Y.) 2 Cell and Molecular Biology Program, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA; [email protected] 3 Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, South China Agriculture University, Guangzhou 510642, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-139-2210-4624; Fax: +86-20-8528-0547 Received: 12 August 2020; Accepted: 16 September 2020; Published: 20 September 2020 Abstract: Cynoglossus monopus, a small benthic fish, belongs to the Cynoglossidae, Pleuronectiformes. It was rarely studied due to its low abundance and cryptical lifestyle. In order to understand the mitochondrial genome and the phylogeny in Cynoglossidae, the complete mitogenome of C. monopus has been sequenced and analyzed for the first time. The total length is 16,425 bp, typically containing 37 genes with novel gene rearrangements. The tRNA-Gln gene is inverted from the light to the heavy strand and translocated from the downstream of tRNA-Ile gene to its upstream. The control region (CR) translocated downstream to the 3’-end of ND1 gene adjoining to inverted to tRNA-Gln and left a 24 bp trace fragment in the original position. The phylogenetic trees were reconstructed by Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) methods based on the mitogenomic data of 32 tonguefish species and two outgroups.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine and Estuarine Fish Fauna of Tamil Nadu, India
    Proceedings of the International Academy of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2018, 8(4): 231-271 Article Marine and estuarine fish fauna of Tamil Nadu, India 1,2 3 1 1 H.S. Mogalekar , J. Canciyal , D.S. Patadia , C. Sudhan 1Fisheries College and Research Institute, Thoothukudi - 628 008, Tamil Nadu, India 2College of Fisheries, Dholi, Muzaffarpur - 843 121, Bihar, India 3Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, Kolkata - 700 120, West Bengal, India E-mail: [email protected] Received 20 June 2018; Accepted 25 July 2018; Published 1 December 2018 Abstract Varied marine and estuarine ecosystems of Tamil Nadu endowed with diverse fish fauna. A total of 1656 fish species under two classes, 40 orders, 191 families and 683 geranra reported from marine and estuarine waters of Tamil Nadu. In the checklist, 1075 fish species were primary marine water and remaining 581 species were diadromus. In total, 128 species were reported under class Elasmobranchii (11 orders, 36 families and 70 genera) and 1528 species under class Actinopterygii (29 orders, 155 families and 613 genera). The top five order with diverse species composition were Perciformes (932 species; 56.29% of the total fauna), Tetraodontiformes (99 species), Pleuronectiforms (77 species), Clupeiformes (72 species) and Scorpaeniformes (69 species). At the family level, the Gobiidae has the greatest number of species (86 species), followed by the Carangidae (65 species), Labridae (64 species) and Serranidae (63 species). Fishery status assessment revealed existence of 1029 species worth for capture fishery, 425 species worth for aquarium fishery, 84 species worth for culture fishery, 242 species worth for sport fishery and 60 species worth for bait fishery.
    [Show full text]