DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Assessment Allenspark Recreational Shooting Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Assessment Allenspark Recreational Shooting Project Environmental Assessment Allenspark Recreational Shooting Project Environmental United States Department of Agriculture Assessment Forest Service Allenspark Recreational Shooting Project June 2011 Boulder Ranger District, Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests and Pawnee National Grassland Boulder County, Colorado T. 2N, R. 71 W, section 4 For Information Contact: Cat Luna 2140 Yarmouth Ave. Boulder, CO 80301 303-541-2508 Draft Environmental Assessment Allenspark Recreational Shooting Project The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Environmental Assessment Allenspark Recreational Shooting Project ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BACKGROUND The Forest Service has prepared this Environmental Assessment (EA) in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other relevant Federal and State laws and regulations. This Environmental Assessment discloses the direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental effects that would result from the Proposed Action of building a shooting range at the former Allenspark Dumpsite and alternatives to the proposed action as well as the no action alternative. Chapter 1 and Chapter 2 serve as an executive summary. Chapter 1 includes information on the history of the proposed project, the purpose of and need for the project, and the agency’s proposal for achieving that purpose and need. Chapter 2 provides a more detailed description of the agency’s Proposed Action as well as alternative methods for achieving the stated purpose. This section also details how the Forest Service informed the public of the proposal and how the public responded. The alternatives were developed based on significant issues raised by the public and other agencies. This discussion also includes possible design criteria. Finally, this section provides a summary table of the environmental effects associated with each alternative and includes a discussion of the no action alternative as well. Chapter 3 contains detailed information of the Affected Environment and environmental effects of implementing the Proposed Action or the alternatives. The appendices provide more detailed information to support the analyses presented in the Environmental Assessment. A list of agencies and persons consulted and contacted is included as well as a glossary for technical terms. Note: Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names and addresses of those who comment, will be considered part of the public record on this Proposed Action and will be available for public inspection. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and considered; however, those who only submit anonymous comments will not have standing to appeal the subsequent decision under 36 CFR Part 215. Additionally, pursuant to 7 CFR 1.27(d), any person may request the agency to withhold a submission from the public record by showing how the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) permits such confidentiality. Persons requesting such confidentiality should be aware that, under the FOIA, confidentiality may be granted in only very limited circumstances, such as to protect trade secrets. The Forest Service will inform the requester of the agency's decision regarding the request for confidentiality, and where the request is denied; the agency will return the submission and notify the requester that the comments may be resubmitted with or without name and address within 15 days. Environmental Assessment Allenspark Recreational Shooting Project Table of Contents Chapter 1 – Purpose and Need for Action 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Background and Need .............................................................................. 2 1.2 Forest Plan Direction ............................................................................................. 2 1.3 Purpose of the Project ........................................................................................... 3 1.4 Decision Framework .............................................................................................. 3 1.5 Public Involvement .................................................................................................. 3 1.6 Key Issues ............................................................................................................... 4 Chapter 2 – Alternatives 2.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 6 2.1 Alternatives .............................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Alternative Comparisons ..................................................................................... 13 2.3 Alternatives Dropped from Detailed Study .......................................................... 14 2.4 Environmental Effects Comparisons of Alternatives .......................................... 15 Chapter 3 – Affected Environment and Environmental Effects 3.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 18 3.1 Recreation .............................................................................................................. 18 3.2 Hazardous Materials ............................................................................................. 26 3.3 Watershed .............................................................................................................. 29 3.4 Soils and Air .......................................................................................................... 36 3.5 Wildlife, Fish and Plants ....................................................................................... 42 3.6 Heritage .................................................................................................................. 55 Appendices A: Issues from Scoping on the Proposed Action ..................................................... 59 B: Allenspark Dumpsite Potential Concept Plan...................................................... 69 C: Glossary ................................................................................................................ 71 D: References ............................................................................................................. 77 E: Consultation, Coordination, and Interdisciplinary Team .................................... 81 Environmental Assessment Allenspark Recreational Shooting Project List of Tables Table 1: Quick Guide Comparison of Alternatives .................................................. 13 Table 2: Effects Comparisons of Alternatives .......................................................... 15 Table 3: PTES Species and MIS Included in Project Analysis ................................ 44 Table 4: Summary of Determinations/Estimation of Effects ................................... 52 List of Figures Figure 1: Recreation Discussion Map ....................................................................... 19 Figure 2: Watershed Discussion Map ....................................................................... 30 Environmental Assessment Allenspark Recreational Shooting Project CChhaapptteerr 11 –– PPuurrppoossee aanndd NNeeeedd ffoorr AAccttiioonn 1.0 Introduction __________________________________ This Environmental Assessment (EA) describes and discloses the direct, indirect and cumulative environmental effects of the proposed action, the no action alternative, and one other alternative to the proposed action for developing a designated shooting area at the former Allenspark Dumpsite to minimize the risks of bullets leaving Forest land and travelling onto nearby private land. This EA is not a decision. Following the review of public comments on this document, the deciding official (the Boulder District Ranger) will make a decision and it will be described and explained in a Decision Notice along with a summary of the comments received on the EA. Location This project is approximately 135 acres of National Forest system land on the Boulder Ranger District of the Roosevelt National Forest in Boulder County, Colorado. Project boundaries are broken into two parcels as depicted on the map below. The larger parcel s approximately 98 acres and the smaller parcel is approximately 37 acres. The project area is approximately a quarter mile east of the intersections of State Highway 7 and State Highway 72. The area location is as follows: T. 2N, R. 71 W, section 4. The former Allenspark Dumpsite is located in the North St. Vrain Geographic Area, as described in the 1997 Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests and Pawnee National Grassland Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan pgs. 97 to 99). 1 Environmental Assessment
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Resolution No. 2020-13
    CITY OF LAFAYETTE RESOLUTION NO. 2020-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE, COLORADO, APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE SHARING OF COSTS AND LOCAL FUNDS FOR THE PRELIMINARY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND DESIGN OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO STATE HIGHWAY 7 FROM BRIGHTON TO BOULDER WHEREAS, the City and County of Broomfield (“Broomfield”) applied for federal Transportation Improvement Program (“TIP”) funds through the Denver Regional Council of Governments (“DRCOG”) for the Colorado State Highway 7 Preliminary & Environmental Engineering Project (“Project”), which relates to proposed improvements to State Highway 7 from Brighton to Boulder; and WHEREAS, the Colorado Department of Transportation (“CDOT”) will be the lead agency for the Project; and WHEREAS, the City of Lafayette, along with Broomfield, Adams County, Colorado, Boulder County, Colorado, the cities of Boulder, Brighton, and Thornton, and the Town of Erie (collectively, the “Parties”), have all committed non-federal funds to the Project; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire to enter into the Intergovernmental Agreement attached hereto and incorporated herein, to provide for the sharing of costs and local funding for the Project in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Intergovernmental Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lafayette desires to approve the Intergovernmental Agreement, with the City’s contribution to the Project to be $130,000.00 in the year 2020. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council
    [Show full text]
  • December Resume - 1 - 2450’ from N Line and 1150’ from W Line of S7
    TO ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN WATER APPLICATIONS IN WATER DIVISION 1: Pursuant to CRS, 37-92-302, you are hereby notified that the following pages comprise a resume of applications and amended applications filed in the office of the Water Clerk for Water Division No. 1 during the month of December, 2001. 2001CW248 CLARENCE AND GLADYS KUNZ, P.O. Box 1867, Silverthorn, CO 80498. Application for Change of Water Right, IN JEFFERSON COUNTY. Kunz Well No. 2 decreed 4/15/1974 in Case No. W-4792, Water Division 1. Decreed point of diversion: NW1/4NE1/4, S23, T6S, R71W, 6th P.M., at a point 428’ E and 124’ S of the N1/4 corner of said section 23. Source: Groundwater Appropriation: 5/1/1954 Amount: 0.02 cfs (9 gpm) Historic use: Decreed use is for domestic, fire protection, recreation, stockwatering and irrigation. Actual historic use has been for domestic at a maximum pumping rate of 7 gpm with an annual limit of one acre-foot under well permit No. 113216 and 113216A. Well permit and map attached to this application. Proposed change: Change of use: Abandon the recreation use of the well, permit No. 113216 and 113216A, originally decreed as Kunz Well No. 2 in case No. W-4792. Said permit allows a maximum of one acre foot. (2 pages) 2001CW249 JACOB KAMMERZELL, 25090 WCR 15, Johnstown, CO 80534. Application for Water Rights (Surface), IN WELD COUNTY. Adams Delta Seepage Ditch originates at the property located in S1/2SE1/4, S30, T5N, R67W, 6th P.M. It originates from a point of 1260+ or – from S30 East boundary line and on the S side of WCR 151/4.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA)
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 01/01/2014 to 03/31/2014 Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) Western Area Power - Special use management In Progress: Expected:03/2014 04/2014 Christopher Wehrli Administration Right-of-Way DEIS NOA in Federal Register 435-896-1053 Maintenance and 09/27/2013 [email protected] Reauthorization Project Est. FEIS NOA in Federal EIS Register 02/2014 Description: Update vegetation management activities along 278 miles of transmission lines located on NFS lands in Colorado, Nebraska, and Utah. These activities are intended to protect the transmission lines by managing for stable, low growth vegetation. Location: UNIT - Ashley National Forest All Units, Grand Valley Ranger District, Norwood Ranger District, Yampa Ranger District, Hahns Peak/Bears Ears Ranger District, Pine Ridge Ranger District, Sulphur Ranger District, East Zone/Dillon Ranger District, Paonia Ranger District, Boulder Ranger District, West Zone/Sopris Ranger District, Canyon Lakes Ranger District, Salida Ranger District, Gunnison Ranger District, Mancos/Dolores Ranger District. STATE - Colorado, Nebraska, Utah. COUNTY - Chaffee, Delta, Dolores, Eagle, Grand, Gunnison, Jackson, Lake, La Plata, Larimer, Mesa, Montrose, Routt, Saguache, San Juan, Dawes, Daggett, Uintah. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Linear transmission lines located in Colorado, Utah, and Nebraska. Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests, Occurring in more than one District (excluding Forestwide) R2 - Rocky Mountain Region NRCS Snotel Project - Watershed management Completed Actual: 08/13/2013 11/2013 Leslie McFadden CE - Special use management 970-295-6651 [email protected] Description: Proposal to convert an existing snow course on Boulder Ranger District to an automated SNOTEL site.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
    COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007 City of Lafayette, Colorado 2007 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007 City of Lafayette Statement of Vision Lafayette’s panoramic view of the Rocky Mountains inspires our view into the future. We value our heritage, our unique neighborhoods, a vibrant economy and active life-styles. We envision a future that mixes small town livability with balanced growth and superior technologies. City of Lafayette, Colorado Prepared By: Finance Department 2007 City of Lafayette, Colorado Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY SECTION Letter of Transmittal .......................................................................................................................... i GFOA Certificate of Achievement ................................................................................................... vi Organizational Chart ...................................................................................................................... vii Directory of City Officials ............................................................................................................ viii FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditors’ Report ........................................................................................................... 1 Management’s Discussion and Analysis ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ayres Associates Report Template
    CO7 Permanent Repair Project MP 19 to 33 (CO72 to Lyons) 60% Draft River Rehabilitation Design Report Prepared for: Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT Region 4) RS&H (1/25/2021) CO7 Permanent Repair Project 60% Draft MP 19 to 33 (CO72 to Lyons) 60% Draft River Rehabilitation Design Report 3665 JFK Parkway, Bldg. 2, Suite 100 Fort Collins, CO 80525-3152 970.223.5556 www.AyresAssociates.com Ayres Project No. 36-4691 Contents Page No. 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Location ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Description ................................................................................................................................... 1 River Rehabilitation Limits ....................................................................................................................... 1 Survey and Topographic Data ................................................................................................................. 2 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Special Flood Hazard Area Designations ............... 3 Compliance .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Criteria ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dodging a Bullet: Lily Lake Dam and the 2013 Colorado Flood Mark E
    Association of State Dam Safety Officials 2014 National Conference Dodging a Bullet: Lily Lake Dam and the 2013 Colorado Flood Mark E. Baker, P.E., Dam Safety Officer, National Park Service Abstract This paper is about identification of high risks at a dam, multiple efforts to promptly mitigate those risks, and how the 2013 Colorado Flood severely tested those mitigation efforts. Had the National Park Service (NPS) not made major efforts to improve the safety of the dam before the event, the dam could have failed by lateral spillway erosion and head cutting, threatening the lives of people in more than two dozen homes downstream. This paper and companion presentation are to share the lessons the NPS and others learned in the areas of risk estimation/evaluation, Emergency Action Planning, environmental compliance, Early Warning System, dam repair, monitoring, event detection, incident response, and incident documentation. The paper describes the use of the Bureau of Reclamation – Small Embankment Dam Safety Guideline [1] approach of teamwork, expert elicitation, making conservative assumptions, building consensus, and the leadership needed to move a high risk, but small dam, project forward in a timely manner to reduce confirmed high risk exposure. ========================================================= A. Background and Risk Estimation/Evaluation Dam Description and Setting Lily Lake Dam (245 ft long and 15 ft high) is an embankment dam in Rocky Mountain National Park (RMNP) in the headwaters of Fish Creek above the town of Estes Park. It was constructed in 1913 and enlarges a natural lake. The reservoir has an area of 18 acres and has a maximum storage at dam crest of 92 ac-ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Climbing Management
    CLIMBING MANAGEMENT A Guide to Climbing Issues and the Development of a Climbing Management Plan The Access Fund PO Box 17010 Boulder, CO 80308 Tel: (303) 545-6772 Fax: (303) 545-6774 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.accessfund.org The Access Fund is the only national advocacy organization whose mission keeps climbing areas open and conserves the climbing environment. A 501(c)3 non-profi t supporting and representing over 1.6 million climbers nationwide in all forms of climbing—rock climbing, ice climbing, mountaineering, and bouldering—the Access Fund is the largest US climbing organization with over 15,000 members and affi liates. The Access Fund promotes the responsible use and sound management of climbing resources by working in cooperation with climbers, other recreational users, public land managers and private land owners. We encourage an ethic of personal responsibility, self-regulation, strong conservation values, and minimum impact practices among climbers. Working toward a future in which climbing and access to climbing resources are viewed as legitimate, valued, and positive uses of the land, the Access Fund advocates to federal, state, and local legislators concerning public lands legislation; works closely with federal and state land managers and other interest groups in planning and implementing public lands management and policy; provides funding for conservation and resource management projects; develops, produces, and distributes climber education materials and programs; and assists in the acquisition and management of climbing resources. FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE ACCESS FUND: Visit http://www.accessfund.org. Copies of this publication are available from the Access Fund and will also be posted on the Access Fund website: http://www.accessfund.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Klettergarden
    Klettergarden To Fort Collins C O M A N C H E P E A K W I L D E R N E S S R A W A H Comanche Peak 12702 ft 3872 m W I L D E R N E S S Mirror Lake L o n R O O S E V E L T g 14 N A T I O N A L F O R E S T D Signal Mountain raw 11262ft l orra 3433m C Cr ee Ro Stormy Peaks k ad Corral Creek 12135ft Cameron Pass Trailhead 3699m Pass my Tr NPS/USFS Mum ail Stormy Peaks Long Draw e Pass gu Mummy Pass N E O T A Ha C Lake re 11440ft e Lake Husted C k 3487m Lost R O O S E V E L T a Louise Lake C O L O R A D O c W I L D E R N E S S h North e il To Fork Tra l a N Walden orth Big pson P rk Thom Lost IR o Lake Fo RVO u Falls SE d Dunraven Riv RE r e e r W RA D R i S T A T E F O R E S T G v N N LO e r o Thunder r t Mountain Rowe Peak h 12070 ft Rowe 3679 m Flatiron Mountain Glacier s 12335ft E ake k L e G an e 3760m Hagues Peak hig r ic C 13560 ft N M B Lake A o 4133 m u Snow n Dunraven / North Agnes Thunder R d Lake a N A T I O N A L Fork Trailhead S Pass La Poudre Pass ry Desolation Peaks N Mummy Mountain 12949 ft Crystal 13425ft I w B o 3947m Lake OX l 4092m CA il W NYON est A H W TC Mount Richthofen DI Fairchild Mountain 12940 ft Lawn T T C 13502 ft Cr ra 3944 m h Lake eek i a 4115 m l E l p N Tepee Mountain GRAN E N i i D L O a n Ypsilon Mountain T T r 12568 ft IT T L S 13514ft U 3831 m W r C Y O e r 4119m L e SKEL L iv e ETON E R k M West O Y GUL re Creek CH d u M Falls o Medicine P Spectacle Glen M r Bow U Lakes e Haven Lead Mountain iv Curve Fall River Pass 12537 ft R Mount Chiquita M ROUTT re 13069ft Ypsilon F O R E S T 3821 m ud Alpine Ridge
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment Agriculture
    United States Department of Environmental Assessment Agriculture Emergency Power Line Clearing Project Forest Service Portions of the Arapaho and Roosevelt, Routt, and White River National Forests in May 2010 Boulder, Clear Creek, Eagle, Garfield, Gilpin, Grand, Gunnison, Jackson, Larimer, Mesa, Pitkin, Rio Blanco, Routt and Summit Counties, Colorado For Information Contact: Jamie Kingsbury 925 Weiss Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 970-870-2149 [email protected] Prepared for: Arapaho & Roosevelt National Forest Routt National Forest White River National Forest Prepared By: JG Management Systems, Inc. 336 Main Street, Suite 207 Grand Junction, CO 81501 970-254-1354 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. –Final – Environmental Assessment of the Emergency Power Line Clearing Project Environmental Assessment Organization This Environmental Assessment (EA) addresses the proposed actions determined by the United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service (USFS), the Arapaho and Roosevelt (ARNF), the Routt (RNF), and the White River National Forests (WRNF) necessary to implement hazard tree removal activities associated with power lines on the three forests, in central Colorado.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Hearing Agenda
    Board of County Commissioners Eva J. Henry - District #1 Charles "Chaz" Tedesco - District #2 Emma Pinter - District #3 Steve O'Dorisio - District #4 Mary Hodge - District #5 PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA NOTICE TO READERS: The Board of County Commissioners' meeting packets are prepared several days prior to the meeting. This information is reviewed and studied by the Board members to gain a basic understanding, thus eliminating lengthy discussions. Timely action and short discussion on agenda items does not reflect a lack of thought or analysis on the Board's part. An informational packet is available for public inspection in the Board's Office one day prior to the meeting. THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE Tuesday February 12, 2019 9:30 AM 1. ROLL CALL 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA 4. AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Adams County Commissioners Career Expo Award Presentation B. Resolution Recognizing Racheal Lampo as the 2019 Adams County Fair Queen and Mandy McCormick as the 2019 Lady In Waiting (File approved by ELT) C. Presentation of the 2019 Adams County Fair Royalty D. Proclamation of February 7-14, 2019 as Congenital Heart Disease Awareness Week 5. PUBLIC COMMENT A. Citizen Communication A total of 30 minutes is allocated at this time for public comment and each speaker will be limited to 3 minutes. If there are additional requests from the public to address the Board, time will be allocated at the end of the meeting to complete public comment. The chair requests that there be no public comment on issues for which a prior public hearing has been held before this Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA)
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 01/01/2017 to 03/31/2017 Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) Western Area Power - Special use management On Hold N/A N/A David Loomis Administration Right-of-Way 303-275-5008 Maintenance and [email protected] Reauthorization Project Description: Update vegetation management activities along 278 miles of transmission lines located on NFS lands in Colorado, EIS Nebraska, and Utah. These activities are intended to protect the transmission lines by managing for stable, low growth vegetation. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=30630 Location: UNIT - Ashley National Forest All Units, Grand Valley Ranger District, Norwood Ranger District, Yampa Ranger District, Hahns Peak/Bears Ears Ranger District, Pine Ridge Ranger District, Sulphur Ranger District, East Zone/Dillon Ranger District, Paonia Ranger District, Boulder Ranger District, West Zone/Sopris Ranger District, Canyon Lakes Ranger District, Salida Ranger District, Gunnison Ranger District, Mancos/Dolores Ranger District. STATE - Colorado, Nebraska, Utah. COUNTY - Chaffee, Delta, Dolores, Eagle, Grand, Gunnison, Jackson, Lake, La Plata, Larimer, Mesa, Montrose, Routt, Saguache, San Juan, Dawes, Daggett, Uintah. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Linear transmission lines located in Colorado, Utah, and Nebraska. R2 - Rocky Mountain Region, Occurring in more than one Forest (excluding Regionwide) Colorado Mountain School - Special use management Developing Proposal Expected:05/2017 06/2017 Jaime Oliva CE Est. Scoping Start 02/2017 303-541-2509 [email protected] Description: The Forest Service proposes to issue a ten-year outfitter and guide permit for mountaineering, avalanche education, and ski touring.
    [Show full text]
  • Hearing Committee on Agriculture House Of
    HEARING TO REVIEW THE 2015 FIRE SEASON AND LONG-TERM TRENDS HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON CONSERVATION AND FORESTRY OF THE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION OCTOBER 8, 2015 Serial No. 114–30 ( Printed for the use of the Committee on Agriculture agriculture.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 97–183 PDF WASHINGTON : 2016 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Mar 15 2010 11:05 Feb 16, 2016 Jkt 041481 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 P:\DOCS\114-30\97183.TXT BRIAN COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE K. MICHAEL CONAWAY, Texas, Chairman RANDY NEUGEBAUER, Texas, COLLIN C. PETERSON, Minnesota, Ranking Vice Chairman Minority Member BOB GOODLATTE, Virginia DAVID SCOTT, Georgia FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma JIM COSTA, California STEVE KING, Iowa TIMOTHY J. WALZ, Minnesota MIKE ROGERS, Alabama MARCIA L. FUDGE, Ohio GLENN THOMPSON, Pennsylvania JAMES P. MCGOVERN, Massachusetts BOB GIBBS, Ohio SUZAN K. DELBENE, Washington AUSTIN SCOTT, Georgia FILEMON VELA, Texas ERIC A. ‘‘RICK’’ CRAWFORD, Arkansas MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM, New Mexico SCOTT DESJARLAIS, Tennessee ANN M. KUSTER, New Hampshire CHRISTOPHER P. GIBSON, New York RICHARD M. NOLAN, Minnesota VICKY HARTZLER, Missouri CHERI BUSTOS, Illinois DAN BENISHEK, Michigan SEAN PATRICK MALONEY, New York JEFF DENHAM, California ANN KIRKPATRICK, Arizona DOUG LAMALFA, California PETE AGUILAR, California RODNEY DAVIS, Illinois STACEY E. PLASKETT, Virgin Islands TED S. YOHO, Florida ALMA S.
    [Show full text]