DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Forest Service National Park Service U.S. Department of Agriculture U.S. Department of the Interior Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests Rocky Mountain National Park and Pawnee National Grassland Highway 7 Recreation Improvements Plan Environmental Assessment June 2009 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the U.S. Department of the Interior (USDI) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Highway 7 Recreation Improvements Plan ii Summary The Boulder Ranger District of the Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests and Pawnee National Grassland (ARP or the “Forest”) and Rocky Mountain National Park (RMNP or the “Park”) have teamed up to develop and propose a variety of recreation improvement projects to address operational concerns, public concerns and improve the recreation experience along the Highway 7 corridor on National Forest and National Park System lands in Boulder and Larimer Counties, Colorado. The project activities include the enhancement and development of facilities at the Lily Lake area and at the Longs Peak Trailhead in the Park and at the Meeker Park Campground and Picnic Site on the Forest. In the Lily Lake area, improvements are needed to accommodate the increasing number of visitors. Inadequate parking and visitor services have resulted in an unsafe situation with visitors crossing the busy highway to access the many trails on the west side of Highway 7. The existing Lily Lake Visitor Center has been unused since late 2004 when an operations review by the Park concluded that the visitor center was no longer needed due to its proximity to other RMNP visitor centers, its proximity to the Estes Park Visitor Center, and due to inadequate funding. A decision needs to be made regarding the future of the visitor center and whether it should be retained for some other use or removed and the land returned to a more natural setting. At the Longs Peak Trailhead, adequate parking has been a challenge for the visitors that come to climb the majestic peak. Climbers and hikers usually arrive in the dark predawn hours to begin their ascent only to find that the parking lot is full. During the summer, parking occurs along Larimer County Road 2H (Longs Peak Road) outside the park boundary creating a line of parked vehicles that can be a mile or more away from the actual trailhead on busy weekends. This off-site parking impacts nearby private landowners and creates a safety issue for motorists and pedestrians on the road. The Longs Peak Campground is available on a first-come first-served basis only (there are no reserved campsites). This 26 site tent-only campground, originally intended for climbers, is attractive to a variety of users including non-climbers. This mix has resulted in use conflicts when climbers wake before dawn to prepare for their ascent. Use conflicts have also arisen with the adjacent Camp Timberline, a private sports camp whose only access is through the Longs Peak Campground. Action is needed to improve the parking situation and pedestrian safety, and to create a visitor use facility that is compatible with surrounding uses and the adjacent private properties. The Meeker “Overflow” Campground and Picnic Site is on National Forest System lands and is located about 3.25 miles from the Longs Peak Trailhead via Longs Peak Road and Highway 7. This campground offers a rustic experience for campers when other more developed sites are filled. The existing design and facilities at the campground are no longer sufficient to handle the increasing demand and use of the facility. The Meeker Park Picnic Site, located on the east side of Highway 7 across from the campground, occupies a small corner of public land that is bordered on two sides Highway 7 Recreation Improvements Plan iii by private lands and dwellings. User conflicts occur as a result of this location. Visitors using the picnic site often wander across the boundary towards a private lake near the site. In the vicinity of the Meeker Park Campground, many trails have been created by users seeking day hiking opportunities. These user created trails have resulted in impacts to scenic quality and wildlife habitat, and have created recreation management challenges. Improvements are needed to address the long-term management objectives and to move the area towards the more sustainable desired conditions identified in the Forest Plan. Action is needed to bring the facilities of this campground up to current Forest Service standards. The USDA Forest Service (USFS) and the USDI National Park Service (NPS) have prepared this Environmental Assessment (EA) in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 and other applicable federal and state laws and regulations. This EA discloses the direct, indirect and cumulative environmental impacts that may result from the implementation of the proposed action and alternatives analyzed for this project within the predetermined project area boundary. The purpose and need for action and the key public issues define the scope of this analysis and document. Public Comment We welcome your comments on this Environmental Assessment. Your comments must be received in writing by close of business on June 30, 2009. If you have Internet access, the preferred method for submitting comments is to use the National Park Service Planning, Environment and Public Comment (PEPC) website: http://parkplanning.nps.gov. From this site, use the drop down menu to select Rocky Mountain National Park. A list of current planning projects will be displayed and you can select the Highway 7 Recreation Improvements Plan Environmental Assessment. Review comments can be submitted online. If you do not have Internet access, you can submit your comments to us in the following ways: • By Mail: Superintendent, Rocky Mountain National Park, Estes Park, Colorado 80517 • By Fax: (970) 586-1397 • By Express Delivery: Superintendent, Rocky Mountain National Park, 1000 Highway 36, Estes Park, Colorado 80517 • Hand Delivery: Rocky Mountain National Park Headquarters, 1000 Highway 36, Estes Park, Colorado or to Kawuneeche Visitor Center, Rocky Mountain National Park, 16018 Highway 34, Grand Lake, Colorado Highway 7 Recreation Improvements Plan iv You do not need to send or deliver comments to both agencies. Comments will be reviewed by both agencies after the close of the comment period. Before including your address, telephone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment – including your personal identifying information – may be made publicly available at any time. While you may request that any personal information be withheld from public review, we cannot guarantee that we can do so. All public comments will be carefully reviewed, and a determination will be made whether to approve a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) or additional NEPA compliance is required. The USFS and the NPS will be making separate decisions. The decision affecting the Lily Lake area and the Longs Peak Trailhead will be made by the Director, Intermountain Region of the NPS. The decision affecting the Meeker Park Picnic Site and Meeker Park Campground will be made by the Boulder District Ranger of the Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests and Pawnee National Grassland. Boulder District Ranger Superintendent Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests Rocky Mountain National Park and Pawnee National Grassland Estes Park, CO 80517 2140 Yarmouth Ave Boulder, CO 80301 Highway 7 Recreation Improvements Plan v TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 - PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION .......................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................ 2 PROJECT LOCATION ................................................................................................... 3 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION ............................................................................. 5 RELATIONSHIP TO NATIONAL FOREST PLANS........................................................... 8 RELATIONSHIP TO NATIONAL PARK PLANS .............................................................. 8 DESIRED CONDITIONS ................................................................................................ 8 Roosevelt National Forest ...................................................................................... 8 Rocky Mountain National Park .............................................................................. 9 PROJECT OBJECTIVES ..............................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Resolution No. 2020-13

    Resolution No. 2020-13

    CITY OF LAFAYETTE RESOLUTION NO. 2020-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE, COLORADO, APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE SHARING OF COSTS AND LOCAL FUNDS FOR THE PRELIMINARY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND DESIGN OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO STATE HIGHWAY 7 FROM BRIGHTON TO BOULDER WHEREAS, the City and County of Broomfield (“Broomfield”) applied for federal Transportation Improvement Program (“TIP”) funds through the Denver Regional Council of Governments (“DRCOG”) for the Colorado State Highway 7 Preliminary & Environmental Engineering Project (“Project”), which relates to proposed improvements to State Highway 7 from Brighton to Boulder; and WHEREAS, the Colorado Department of Transportation (“CDOT”) will be the lead agency for the Project; and WHEREAS, the City of Lafayette, along with Broomfield, Adams County, Colorado, Boulder County, Colorado, the cities of Boulder, Brighton, and Thornton, and the Town of Erie (collectively, the “Parties”), have all committed non-federal funds to the Project; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire to enter into the Intergovernmental Agreement attached hereto and incorporated herein, to provide for the sharing of costs and local funding for the Project in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Intergovernmental Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lafayette desires to approve the Intergovernmental Agreement, with the City’s contribution to the Project to be $130,000.00 in the year 2020. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council
  • Evaluation of Hanging Lake

    Evaluation of Hanging Lake

    Evaluation of Hanging Lake Garfield County, Colorado for its Merit in Meeting National Significance Criteria as a National Natural Landmark in Representing Lakes, Ponds and Wetlands in the Southern Rocky Mountain Province prepared by Karin Decker Colorado Natural Heritage Program 1474 Campus Delivery Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 August 27, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................. 2 LISTS OF TABLES AND FIGURES ............................................................................. 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 4 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 5 Source of Site Proposal ................................................................................................... 5 Evaluator(s) ..................................................................................................................... 5 Scope of Evaluation ........................................................................................................ 5 PNNL SITE DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................... 5 Brief Overview ...............................................................................................................
  • Denudation History and Internal Structure of the Front Range and Wet Mountains, Colorado, Based on Apatite-Fission-Track Thermoc

    Denudation History and Internal Structure of the Front Range and Wet Mountains, Colorado, Based on Apatite-Fission-Track Thermoc

    NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF GEOLOGY & MINERAL RESOURCES, BULLETIN 160, 2004 41 Denudation history and internal structure of the Front Range and Wet Mountains, Colorado, based on apatite­fission­track thermochronology 1 2 1Department of Earth and Environmental Science, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801Shari A. Kelley and Charles E. Chapin 2New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801 Abstract An apatite fission­track (AFT) partial annealing zone (PAZ) that developed during Late Cretaceous time provides a structural datum for addressing questions concerning the timing and magnitude of denudation, as well as the structural style of Laramide deformation, in the Front Range and Wet Mountains of Colorado. AFT cooling ages are also used to estimate the magnitude and sense of dis­ placement across faults and to differentiate between exhumation and fault­generated topography. AFT ages at low elevationX along the eastern margin of the southern Front Range between Golden and Colorado Springs are from 100 to 270 Ma, and the mean track lengths are short (10–12.5 µm). Old AFT ages (> 100 Ma) are also found along the western margin of the Front Range along the Elkhorn thrust fault. In contrast AFT ages of 45–75 Ma and relatively long mean track lengths (12.5–14 µm) are common in the interior of the range. The AFT ages generally decrease across northwest­trending faults toward the center of the range. The base of a fossil PAZ, which separates AFT cooling ages of 45– 70 Ma at low elevations from AFT ages > 100 Ma at higher elevations, is exposed on the south side of Pikes Peak, on Mt.
  • Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section, Southwestern Colorado & Northwestern New Mexico

    Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section, Southwestern Colorado & Northwestern New Mexico

    Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section, Southwestern Colorado & Northwestern New Mexico William H. Romme, M. Lisa Floyd, David Hanna with contributions by Elisabeth J. Bartlett, Michele Crist, Dan Green, Henri D. Grissino-Mayer, J. Page Lindsey, Kevin McGarigal, & Jeffery S.Redders Produced by the Colorado Forest Restoration Institute at Colorado State University, and Region 2 of the U.S. Forest Service May 12, 2009 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY … p 5 AUTHORS’ AFFILIATIONS … p 16 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS … p 16 CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION A. Objectives and Organization of This Report … p 17 B. Overview of Physical Geography and Vegetation … p 19 C. Climate Variability in Space and Time … p 21 1. Geographic Patterns in Climate 2. Long-Term Variability in Climate D. Reference Conditions: Concept and Application … p 25 1. Historical Range of Variability (HRV) Concept 2. The Reference Period for this Analysis 3. Human Residents and Influences during the Reference Period E. Overview of Integrated Ecosystem Management … p 30 F. Literature Cited … p 34 CHAPTER II. PONDEROSA PINE FORESTS A. Vegetation Structure and Composition … p 39 B. Reference Conditions … p 40 1. Reference Period Fire Regimes 2. Other agents of disturbance 3. Pre-1870 stand structures C. Legacies of Euro-American Settlement and Current Conditions … p 67 1. Logging (“High-Grading”) in the Late 1800s and Early 1900s 2. Excessive Livestock Grazing in the Late 1800s and Early 1900s 3. Fire Exclusion Since the Late 1800s 4. Interactions: Logging, Grazing, Fire, Climate, and the Forests of Today D. Summary … p 83 E. Literature Cited … p 84 CHAPTER III.
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

    National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determination for individual properties and districts. See instruction in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking ``x'' in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter ``N/A'' for ``not applicable.'' For functions, architectural classification, materials and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name East Longs Peak Trail; Longs Peak Trail; Keyhole Route; Shelf Trail other names/site number 5LR.11413; 5BL.10344 2. Location street & number West of State Highway 7 (ROMO) [N/A] not for publication city or town Allenspark [X] vicinity state Colorado code CO county Larimer; Boulder code 069; 013 zip code 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this [X] nomination [ ] request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property [ ] meets [ ] does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant [ ] nationally [ ] statewide [X] locally.
  • Colorado Fourteeners Checklist

    Colorado Fourteeners Checklist

    Colorado Fourteeners Checklist Rank Mountain Peak Mountain Range Elevation Date Climbed 1 Mount Elbert Sawatch Range 14,440 ft 2 Mount Massive Sawatch Range 14,428 ft 3 Mount Harvard Sawatch Range 14,421 ft 4 Blanca Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,351 ft 5 La Plata Peak Sawatch Range 14,343 ft 6 Uncompahgre Peak San Juan Mountains 14,321 ft 7 Crestone Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,300 ft 8 Mount Lincoln Mosquito Range 14,293 ft 9 Castle Peak Elk Mountains 14,279 ft 10 Grays Peak Front Range 14,278 ft 11 Mount Antero Sawatch Range 14,276 ft 12 Torreys Peak Front Range 14,275 ft 13 Quandary Peak Mosquito Range 14,271 ft 14 Mount Evans Front Range 14,271 ft 15 Longs Peak Front Range 14,259 ft 16 Mount Wilson San Miguel Mountains 14,252 ft 17 Mount Shavano Sawatch Range 14,231 ft 18 Mount Princeton Sawatch Range 14,204 ft 19 Mount Belford Sawatch Range 14,203 ft 20 Crestone Needle Sangre de Cristo Range 14,203 ft 21 Mount Yale Sawatch Range 14,200 ft 22 Mount Bross Mosquito Range 14,178 ft 23 Kit Carson Mountain Sangre de Cristo Range 14,171 ft 24 Maroon Peak Elk Mountains 14,163 ft 25 Tabeguache Peak Sawatch Range 14,162 ft 26 Mount Oxford Collegiate Peaks 14,160 ft 27 Mount Sneffels Sneffels Range 14,158 ft 28 Mount Democrat Mosquito Range 14,155 ft 29 Capitol Peak Elk Mountains 14,137 ft 30 Pikes Peak Front Range 14,115 ft 31 Snowmass Mountain Elk Mountains 14,099 ft 32 Windom Peak Needle Mountains 14,093 ft 33 Mount Eolus San Juan Mountains 14,090 ft 34 Challenger Point Sangre de Cristo Range 14,087 ft 35 Mount Columbia Sawatch Range
  • December Resume - 1 - 2450’ from N Line and 1150’ from W Line of S7

    December Resume - 1 - 2450’ from N Line and 1150’ from W Line of S7

    TO ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN WATER APPLICATIONS IN WATER DIVISION 1: Pursuant to CRS, 37-92-302, you are hereby notified that the following pages comprise a resume of applications and amended applications filed in the office of the Water Clerk for Water Division No. 1 during the month of December, 2001. 2001CW248 CLARENCE AND GLADYS KUNZ, P.O. Box 1867, Silverthorn, CO 80498. Application for Change of Water Right, IN JEFFERSON COUNTY. Kunz Well No. 2 decreed 4/15/1974 in Case No. W-4792, Water Division 1. Decreed point of diversion: NW1/4NE1/4, S23, T6S, R71W, 6th P.M., at a point 428’ E and 124’ S of the N1/4 corner of said section 23. Source: Groundwater Appropriation: 5/1/1954 Amount: 0.02 cfs (9 gpm) Historic use: Decreed use is for domestic, fire protection, recreation, stockwatering and irrigation. Actual historic use has been for domestic at a maximum pumping rate of 7 gpm with an annual limit of one acre-foot under well permit No. 113216 and 113216A. Well permit and map attached to this application. Proposed change: Change of use: Abandon the recreation use of the well, permit No. 113216 and 113216A, originally decreed as Kunz Well No. 2 in case No. W-4792. Said permit allows a maximum of one acre foot. (2 pages) 2001CW249 JACOB KAMMERZELL, 25090 WCR 15, Johnstown, CO 80534. Application for Water Rights (Surface), IN WELD COUNTY. Adams Delta Seepage Ditch originates at the property located in S1/2SE1/4, S30, T5N, R67W, 6th P.M. It originates from a point of 1260+ or – from S30 East boundary line and on the S side of WCR 151/4.
  • Governors' Top Education Priorities in 2020 State of the State Addresses

    Governors' Top Education Priorities in 2020 State of the State Addresses

    MAR 2020 Governors’ Top Education Priorities in 2020 State of the State Addresses Bryan Kelley and Erin Whinnery 1 ecs.org | @EdCommission ecs.orgnga.org | | @NatlGovsAssoc@EdCommission nga.org | @NatlGovsAssoc In laying out policy priorities in their 2020 We are committed to go the distance State of the State addresses, governors recognized the role the public education because we know our children’s future system plays in supporting strong is at risk. Education is the foundation economies. Often citing the need to align of our economy and our quality of life. education with the 21st century’s knowledge Everything, including our future, begins economy, governors agreed that a high- with how well we educate our children. quality education is the key to both an individual’s and the state’s success. Alabama And that is significantly affected by the Gov. Kay Ivey echoed the sentiments of kind of beginnings we provide for them. many governors when she said, “For us to We cannot let them down. prepare today’s students for tomorrow’s Gov. David Ige opportunities, it is time we get serious.” HAWAII Each year, Education Commission of the States tracks, analyzes and identifies trends in education policy accomplishments and proposals featured in governors’ State of the State addresses. To date, 43 governors have delivered their 2020 address. The top education priorities across the states and territories span the entire education spectrum, pre-K through the workforce. Governors in at least* 34 states emphasized the importance of K-12 CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION (CTE) and WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS. Governors in at least 30 states mentioned K-12 SCHOOL FINANCE, including NEW INVESTMENTS for certain STUDENT POPULATIONS.
  • Description of the Telluride Quadrangle

    Description of the Telluride Quadrangle

    DESCRIPTION OF THE TELLURIDE QUADRANGLE. INTRODUCTION. along the southern base, and agricultural lands water Jura of other parts of Colorado, and follow­ vents from which the lavas came are unknown, A general statement of the geography, topography, have been found in valley bottoms or on lower ing them comes the Cretaceous section, from the and the lavas themselves have been examined slopes adjacent to the snow-fed streams Economic Dakota to the uppermost coal-bearing member, the only in sufficient degree to show the predominant and geology of the San Juan region of from the mountains. With the devel- imp°rtance- Colorado. Laramie. Below Durango the post-Laramie forma­ presence of andesites, with other types ranging opment of these resources several towns of tion, made up of eruptive rock debris and known in composition from rhyolite to basalt. Pene­ The term San Juan region, or simply " the San importance have been established in sheltered as the "Animas beds," rests upon the Laramie, trating the bedded series are several massive Juan," used with variable meaning by early valleys on all sides. Railroads encircle the group and is in turn overlain by the Puerco and higher bodies of often coarsely granular rocks, such as explorers, and naturally with indefinite and penetrate to some of the mining centers of Eocene deposits. gabbro and diorite, and it now seems probable limitation during the period of settle- sa^juan the the interior. Creede, Silverton, Telluride, Ouray, Structurally, the most striking feature in the that the intrusive bodies of diorite-porphyry and ment, is. now quite.
  • Nederland Area Market Analysis and Action Plan Final Report October, 2004 Contents I

    Nederland Area Market Analysis and Action Plan Final Report October, 2004 Contents I

    Nederland Area Market Analysis and Action Plan Final Report October, 2004 Contents I. Executive Summary 2 II. Economic Profile 3 III. Competition and Leakage Analysis 18 IV. Stakeholder Priorities 20 V. Community Attitudes Survey 27 VI. Conclusions 34 VII. Niche Strategy 35 VIII. Action Plan Recommendations 36 IX. Action Steps and Sequencing 49 prepared for The Nederland Area Chamber of Commerce by Progressive Urban Management Associates, Inc. This report is property of the Nederland Area Chamber of Commerce. All reproduction rights are reserved by the Nederland Area Chamber of Commerce. Thank you to the Donors who have made this Market Analysis possible: Nederland Area Chamber of Commerce Auction Donors and Participants Boulder County Commissioners Caribou Mercantile Companies Nederland Central Business District Redevelopment, LLC B&F Mountain Market Town of Nederland Mike Verplank Peak National Bank Nederland Area Seniors Nederland Community Library Foundation Nederland Elementary School PTO Teens, Inc. Wild Bear Center for Nature Discovery Accounting Specialists Chinahawk, LLC Deborah Davenport Irish & Reynolds X-Media, Inc. Mountain People's Coop Nederland M/S High School Parent Action Group Century 21 - Robert Hurst Timberline Builders Anonymous 1 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Town of Nederland is located 17 miles west of Boulder. An historic mining town founded in 1874, Nederland is the center of a vast 225 square mile market area with about 5,000 residents. Within a half hour drive of Colorado’s explosive Front Range market, Nederland aims to retain its unique small town and mountain lifestyle – a recreational gateway surrounded by national forests and striking mountain scenery. Despite its many attributes, Nederland has struggled financially in recent years.
  • Abstracts, Posters and Program

    Abstracts, Posters and Program

    Gold and Silver Deposits in Colorado Symposium Abstracts, posters And program Berthoud Hall, Colorado School of Mines Golden, Colorado July 20-24, 2017 GOLD AND SILVER DEPOSITS IN COLORADO SYMPOSIUM July 20-24, 2017 ABSTRACTS, POSTERS AND PROGRAM Principle Editors: Lewis C. Kleinhans Mary L. Little Peter J. Modreski Sponsors: Colorado School of Mines Geology Museum Denver Regional Geologists’ Society Friends of the Colorado School of Mines Geology Museum Friends of Mineralogy – Colorado Chapter Front Cover: Breckenridge wire gold specimen (photo credit Jeff Scovil). Cripple Creek Open Pit Mine panorama, March 10, 2017 (photo credit Mary Little). Design by Lew Kleinhans. Back Cover: The Mineral Industry Timeline – Exploration (old gold panner); Discovery (Cresson "Vug" from Cresson Mine, Cripple Creek); Development (Cripple Creek Open Pit Mine); Production (gold bullion refined from AngloGold Ashanti Cripple Creek dore and used to produce the gold leaf that was applied to the top of the Colorado Capital Building. Design by Lew Kleinhans and Jim Paschis. Berthoud Hall, Colorado School of Mines Golden, Colorado July 20-24, 2017 Symposium Planning Committee Members: Peter J. Modreski Michael L. Smith Steve Zahony Lewis C. Kleinhans Mary L. Little Bruce Geller Jim Paschis Amber Brenzikofer Ken Kucera L.J.Karr Additional thanks to: Bill Rehrig and Jim Piper. Acknowledgements: Far too many contributors participated in the making of this symposium than can be mentioned here. Notwithstanding, the Planning Committee would like to acknowledge and express appreciation for endorsements from the Colorado Geological Survey, the Colorado Mining Association, the Colorado Department of Natural Resources and the Colorado Division of Mine Safety and Reclamation.
  • Estes Park Visitor Research Summer 2018 Appendices

    Estes Park Visitor Research Summer 2018 Appendices

    SUMMER 2018 VISITOR SURVEY RESULTS NOVEMBER 28, 2018 PREPARED FOR VISIT ESTES PARK 1 Photo: Visit Estes Park OUTLINE • Purpose, methodology & tourism volume indicators • Place of residence & visitor type • Demographics • Trip planning & decision factors • Trip characteristics • Ratings of experience • Internet issues • General travel patterns & preferences • Summary 2 PURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH • Measure quarterly & year-round profile of visitors to Estes Park • This report summarizes the initial, summer quarter of research (Jun – Aug 2018) • Research is ongoing through May 2019 • Research is intended to track a wide range of topics for purposes of marketing strategy, product development & evaluation, & related issues • Evaluate economic impact of tourism in Estes Park Local Marketing District • Summer quarter analysis is in progress, report to be completed January 2019 (analysis is being led by CU Business Research Division) • Quarterly reports and an annual report to be completed tracking activity through May 2019 3 SURVEY METHODOLOGY • Research approach 1. Brief intercept survey (with email collection for post-trip survey) 2. In-depth post-trip survey (follow-up survey with intercept respondents) • Intercept survey • Sample size: 1,449 survey completes between June 9 and August 31, 2018 • 95% confidence interval: +/- 2.6 percentage points • Survey locations: 53% EP Visitor Center, 37% downtown EP, 10% elsewhere (parking garage, fairgrounds, National Park Village South, YMCA, elsewhere) • Survey topics: Geographic origin, overnight stay