DOCSLIB.ORG

En En Amendments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Industry, Research and Energy 2016/0403(COD) 25.9.2017 AMENDMENTS 7 - 29 Draft opinion Maria Spyraki (PE601.274v01-00) Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council introducing a European services e-card and related administrative facilities Proposal for a regulation (COM(2016)0824 – C8-0014/2017 – 2016/0403(COD)) AM\1134907EN.docx PE601.275v02-00 EN United in diversity EN AM_Com_LegOpinion PE601.275v02-00 2/15 AM\1134907EN.docx EN Amendment 7 Markus Pieper, Markus Ferber, Sven Schulze Proposal for a regulation Proposal for rejection The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy calls on the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, as the committee responsible, to propose rejection of the Commission proposal. Or. de Justification Alle sinnvollen Bemühungen zur Vollendung des Binnenmarkts sind ausdrücklich zu unterstützen. Die Einführung einer elektronischen EU-Dienstleistungskarte, so wie es der Vorschlag vorsieht, würde jedoch unnötigerweise zusätzliche Bürokratie, Schaffung von Doppelstrukturen und Mehrkosten nicht für die Mitgliedstaaten sondern auch für die potentiellen Adressaten wie beispielsweise Architekten, Ingenieure oder bauhandwerkliche Dienstleister bedeuten. Gleichzeitig verwässert der Vorschlag den in der Dienstleistungsrichtlinie (2006/123/EG) etablierten Grundsatz der Geltung des Rechts des Ortes, an dem die Wertschöpfung erfolgt. Wogegen die möglichen Vorteile einer solchen Karte nicht ausreichend deutlich sind. Im Ergebnis würde das Ziel der verbesserten Mobilität der Dienstleister im Binnenmarkt möglicherweise konterkariert werden. Es sind noch zu viele Fragen bei der Umsetzung ungenügend oder gar nicht geklärt, sodass weitere Konsultationen der Betroffenen durchgeführt und der Vorschlag überarbeitet werden sollte. Amendment 8 Kathleen Van Brempt Proposal for a regulation Proposal for rejection The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy calls on the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, as the committee responsible, to propose rejection of the Commission AM\1134907EN.docx 3/15 PE601.275v02-00 EN proposal. Or. nl Justification The purpose of this amendment is to reject the regulation so as to ensure that the e-card is not introduced, since it paves the way for social dumping and unfair competition and significantly restricts the host Member State’s scope for carrying out checks. That is unacceptable. Amendment 9 Marisa Matias Proposal for a regulation Proposal for rejection The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy calls on the Committee on Internal Market and Consumer Protection, as the committee responsible, to propose rejection of the Commission proposal. Or. en Amendment 10 Hermann Winkler Proposal for a regulation Proposal for rejection The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy calls on the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, as the committee responsible, to propose rejection of the Commission proposal. Or. de PE601.275v02-00 4/15 AM\1134907EN.docx EN Justification Alle sinnvollen Bemühungen zur Vollendung des Binnenmarkts wie den Abbau von Bürokratie und rechtlicher Unsicherheiten bei der grenzüberschreitenden Dienstleistungserbringung, insbesondere für KMU, unterstützt der Autor ausdrücklich. Die Einführung einer elektronischen EU-Dienstleistungskarte in der hier vorgelegten Form führt jedoch möglicherweise gerade zu zusätzlichem Verwaltungsaufwand, Doppelstrukturen, Rechtsunsicherheit und Mehrkosten für Mitgliedstaaten und potentielle Adressaten wie beispielsweise Architekten, Ingenieuren oder dem Bauhandwerk. Im Ergebnis würde dies dem zu erreichenden Ziel der verbesserten Mobilität der Dienstleister im Binnenmarkt möglicherweise entgegenstehen. Die potentiellen Vorteile einer solchen Karte werden im vorgelegten Vorschlag hingegen nicht ausreichend deutlich. Insgesamt sind noch zu viele Fragen bei der Umsetzung, wie sie der Vorschlag vorsieht, offen, sodass weitere Konsultationen der betroffenen Interessenvertreter durchgeführt werden sollten und dann gegebenenfalls ein neuer Vorschlag vorgelegt werden sollte. Amendment 11 Olle Ludvigsson, Carlos Zorrinho, Eva Kaili Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (6) Cross-border trade and cross-border (6) Cross-border trade and cross-border investment in certain business and investment in services are particularly low construction services are particularly low showing a potential for better integration of showing a potential for better integration of services markets. The potential for more services markets with significant negative growth and jobs in the Single Market repercussions for the remaining part of should be fully exploited, while at the the economy. This underperformance same time high standards for consumers leads to situations where the potential for and workers should be maintained, and more growth and jobs in the Single Market fair competition and a level playing field has not been fully exploited. for companies should be ensured. Or. en Amendment 12 Olle Ludvigsson, Carlos Zorrinho, Eva Kaili Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment AM\1134907EN.docx 5/15 PE601.275v02-00 EN (7) Addressing remaining obstacles to (7) Addressing remaining obstacles to more cross-border activities in services will more cross-border activities in services, help to strengthen competition, resulting in while at the same time maintaining high more choice and better prices for standards for consumers and workers, consumers as well as more competitive will help to strengthen competition, services sectors creating new jobs, resulting in more choice and better prices promoting productivity and ensuring a for consumers as well as more competitive more attractive climate for investment and services sectors creating new jobs, innovation. promoting productivity and ensuring a more attractive climate for investment and innovation. Or. en Amendment 13 Olle Ludvigsson, Carlos Zorrinho, Kathleen Van Brempt, Eva Kaili Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (10) In so doing, this Regulation (10) In so doing, this Regulation specifically targets business and specifically targets business service sectors construction service sectors included in included in scope of Directive …[ESC scope of Directive …[ESC Directive]… Directive]… which face some of the most which face some of the most stringent stringent regulatory and administrative regulatory and administrative barriers to barriers to cross-border expansion and cross-border expansion and consequently consequently have an unexploited potential have an unexploited potential for internal for internal market integration. market integration. Or. en Amendment 14 Olle Ludvigsson, Carlos Zorrinho, Kathleen Van Brempt, Eva Kaili Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (11) All matters, activities and fields (11) All matters, activities and fields excluded from the scope of Directive excluded from the scope of Directive PE601.275v02-00 6/15 AM\1134907EN.docx EN 2006/123/EC should remain excluded from 2006/123/EC should remain excluded from the scope of this Regulation. In particular, the scope of this Regulation. In particular, this Regulation does not affect matters, this Regulation does not affect matters, activities and fields such as those deriving activities and fields such as those deriving from taxation, social security and labour from taxation, social security and labour law, including any legal or contractual law, including any legal or contractual provision concerning employment provision concerning employment conditions, working conditions, including conditions, working conditions, including health and safety at work and the health and safety at work and the relationship between employers and relationship between employers and workers. Equally this Regulation does not workers. This Regulation is without affect the social security legislation of the prejudice to the different labour market Member States. This Regulation is also models of the Member States, without prejudice to any provision including labour market models regulated stemming from competition law as well as by collective agreements. Equally this any rule on the applicable law or Regulation does not affect the social jurisdiction pursuant to private security legislation of the Member States. international law. This Regulation is also without prejudice to any provision stemming from competition law as well as any rule on the applicable law or jurisdiction pursuant to private international law. Or. en Amendment 15 Olle Ludvigsson, Carlos Zorrinho, Eva Kaili Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (14) The European services e-card (14) The European services e-card should be fully electronic, rely almost should be fully electronic, rely exclusively exclusively on data provided by reliable on data provided by reliable sources, limit sources, limit the use of documents to the the use of documents to the minimum minimum necessary and allow for necessary and allow for multilingual multilingual processing to avoid translation processing to avoid translation costs. In costs. In order to make the procedure fully order to make the procedure fully electronic and allow for administrative electronic and allow for administrative cooperation between home and host cooperation between home and host Member States. The Internal Market Member States. The Internal
Recommended publications
  • European Parliament 2019-2024

    European Parliament 2019-2024

    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ITRE_PV(2019)0925_1 MINUTES Meeting of 25 September 2019, 9.00-12.30 and 14.30-18.30 BRUSSELS 25 September 2019, 9.00 – 10.00 In camera 1. Coordinators’ meeting The Coordinators’ meeting was held from 9.00 to 10.00 in camera with Adina-Ioana Vălean (Chair) in the chair. (See Annex I) * * * The meeting opened at 10.04 on Wednesday, 25 September 2019, with Adina-Ioana Vălean (Chair) presiding. 2. Adoption of agenda The agenda was adopted. PV\1189744EN.docx PE641.355 EN United in diversityEN 3. Chair’s announcements Chair’s announcements concerning coordinators’ decisions of 3 September 2019. Chair has informed the Committee members that the Committee meeting of 7-8 October has been cancelled due to the Commissioner hearing. The next ITRE Committee meeting will take place on the 17 October 2019. 4. Approval of minutes of meetings 2-3 September 2019 PV – PE641.070v01-00 The minutes were approved. *** Electronic vote *** 5. Establishing the European Cybersecurity Industrial, Technology and Research Competence Centre and the Network of National Coordination Centres ITRE/9/01206 ***I 2018/0328(COD) COM(2018)0630 – C8-0404/2018 Rapporteur: Rasmus Andresen (Verts/ALE) Responsible: ITRE Vote on the decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations The decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations was adopted: for: 49; against: 12; abstention: 2. (Due to technical issues, roll-call page is not available) 6. Labelling of tyres with respect to fuel efficiency and other essential parameters ITRE/9/01207 ***I 2018/0148(COD) COM(2018)0296 – C8-0190/2018 Rapporteur: Michał Boni Responsible: ITRE Vote on the decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations The decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations was adopted: for: 56; against: 3; abstention: 4.
  • Hon. Mr President of the European Parliament, Dear David Sassoli

    Hon. Mr President of the European Parliament, Dear David Sassoli

    Hon. Mr President of the European Parliament, Dear David Sassoli, Since March, when the outbreak of COVID-19 intensified in Europe, the functioning of the European Parliament (EP) has changed dramatically, due to the sanitary measures applied. We understand the inevitability of the contingency plan, taking into account the need to prevent infection and the spread of the virus and to protect the health and lives of people. Six months later, the functioning of the EP is gradually returning to normal. However, there are services whose unavailability seriously impairs parliamentary work, namely the interpretation service. The European Union (EU) has 24 official languages and all deserve the same respect and treatment. We recognize that the number of languages available in committee meeting rooms has been increasing, but even so, more than half of the languages still have no interpretation. Multilingualism is a right enshrined in the Treaties that allows Members to express themselves in their own language. Now, that is not happening and we are concerned that the situation will continue, even taking into account the expected workflow in the commissions after these atypical six months. In this sense, we appeal, once again, to you, the President of the EP for the application of the letter and the spirit of the principle of multilingualism, finding solutions that respect this principle and that allow the use of any of the 24 official languages of the EU. The expression of each deputy in her/his own language is a priority so that there can be conditions to fully exercise the mandate for which she/he was elected and a condition of respect for the citizens who elected her/him.
  • Letter to EU Telecom and Trade Ministers and to European Commissioners Thierry Breton, Margrethe Vestager and Valdis Dombrovskis

    Letter to EU Telecom and Trade Ministers and to European Commissioners Thierry Breton, Margrethe Vestager and Valdis Dombrovskis

    Letter to EU telecom and trade ministers and to European Commissioners Thierry Breton, Margrethe Vestager and Valdis Dombrovskis We, the undersigned Members of the European Parliament from five different political groups, share a common concern regarding 5G security in Europe and unfair competition between European and Chinese 5G vendors. Therefore, we send this letter to you in preparation of the upcoming informal TTE Council on 15 October, urging you to take action on the points raised. We have learnt from the COVID-19 crisis that maintaining know-how, capacity and some level of independence in critical sectors, including medical/pharmaceutical, food supplies, and utilities, i.e. energy, water and communications infrastructure is indispensable for our survival. In the area of connectivity, COVID-19 has demonstrated how vital fixed and mobile connectivity is to help fight the crisis and to keep the economy and essential services running to the extent possible. The European Commission has, already pre-crisis, launched a number of initiatives to preserve our security and sovereignty, which today prove to be more relevant than ever before. These include a renewed industrial strategy with digitization and connectivity at its heart, increased funding proposals for connectivity, cyber security and AI, the investment screening framework to avoid harmful foreign take-overs of critical EU businesses, trade policy initiatives promoting reciprocity, and more concretely, the 5G security joint risk assessment and toolbox of mitigating measures. 5G is a central element in Europe’s digital sovereignty and the EU 5G security initiative rightly has the aim of safeguarding the security of 5G as a critical infrastructure for Europe.
  • Brussels, 24 February 2021

    Brussels, 24 February 2021

    Brussels, 24 February 2021 Declaration from Members of the European Parliament to urge the Commission and Member States not to block the TRIPS waiver at the WTO and to support global access to COVID-19 vaccines We, Members of the European Parliament, urge the European Commission and the European Council to review their opposition to the TRIPS waiver proposal at the World Trade Organisation (WTO), which serves to enable greater access to affordable COVID-19 health technologies, including vaccines, in particular for developing and middle income countries. This call comes in view of the European Council meeting of 25 February 2021 and the crucial decision to be made by all Member States at the WTO General Council on 1-2 March 2021. Since the beginning of the pandemic, the need to ensure global open access to COVID-19 health technologies and to rapidly scale up their manufacturing and supply has been widely acknowledged. However, despite efforts and statements made by the European Commission and several heads of state in support of treating COVID-19 medical products as global public goods, this has not yet translated into actionable realities. In this context, the EU’s open opposition to the TRIPS waiver risks exacerbating a dangerous North-South divide when it comes to affordable access to COVID-19 diagnostics, personal protective equipment, treatments and vaccines. The WTO decision on a potential waiver offers a crucial and much-needed act of effective solidarity, as it is an important step towards increasing local production in partner countries and, ultimately, suppressing this pandemic on a global scale.
  • Should the EU Introduce Minimum Standards for the Implementation of the Youth Guarantees?

    Should the EU Introduce Minimum Standards for the Implementation of the Youth Guarantees?

    Should the EU oppose the introduction of minimum standards for the implementation of the youth guarantees? The vote of the MEPs Social policy mostly remains a competence of the Member States of the European Union. However, in some occasions, the European Commission managed to set common frameworks for labor and social standards in the EU. A resolution approved by the European Parliament called on the European Commission to propose a European legal framework introducing minimum standards for the implementation of the youth guarantees, including the quality of apprenticeships, decent wages for young people and access to employment services. However, the Conservative and Eurocritic group ECR rejected this proposal and tried to delete this provision from the text. Ultimately, most MEPs supported the call for a common European framework on this matter and only ECR, ENF and part of EFDD supported the amendment against the minimum standards. The Greeks were also on the same page as the majority of the EU Parliament, with a majority supporting the European legal framework for youth employment. The support came from the loyal members of the EPP (New Democracy), with one exception of Georgios Kyrtsos, who decided to abstain (he did not vote in the plenary, but he eventually notified his intention to abstain). Similarly the leftist members of S&D and DISTRIBUTION OF GREEK POLITICAL PARTIES IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT IN 2016 GUE-NGL supported the provision as well as Non- Inscrits: European the members of the Communist Party of KKE, Golden United Left- Greece. Interestingly, Eva Kaili from PASOK Dawn Nordic Green Left: voted against it.
  • Maria João Rodrigues Relatora De Documento

    Maria João Rodrigues Relatora De Documento

    www.pseuropa.pt | www.twitter.com/psnaeuropa Nº 116 • JULHO DE 2016 FOTO PE EDITORIAL FRANCISCO ASSIS Esperemos que no final acabe, apesar MARIA JOÃO RODRIGUES RELATORA de tudo, por prevalecer a posição menos DE DOCUMENTO QUE PRETENDE insensata DAR UM NOVO RUMO À EUROPA PÁG. 3 A eventual aplicação de sanções a Portugal por incum- AÇORES primento dos objectivos orçamentais acordados no ano 1. de 2015 constitui uma injustiça e dá um sinal errado. Ao RICARDO SERRÃO SANTOS NA DEFESA longo dos últimos 10 anos, com a excepção do período mais agu- DOS PRODUTORES LOCAIS PÁG. 2 do da crise financeira em que a própria Comissão Europeia ins- tigou os governos nacionais a adoptarem políticas orçamentais expansionistas, os sucessivos executivos portugueses empe- PORTO RECEBEU CONFERÊNCIA nharam-se com sucesso num esforço drástico de consolidação orçamental. O actual governo tem reiteradamente assumido a INTERNACIONAL PROMOVIDA PELOS intenção de prosseguir esse esforço, ainda que recorrendo a ins- EURODEPUTADOS SOCIALISTAS PÁG. 2 trumentos de política económica diferentes. Não há neste mo- mento qualquer razão para pensar que esteja em causa o cabal cumprimento dos objectivos resultantes da nossa participação OPINIÃO na moeda única. O Primeiro-Ministro tem reiterado de forma en- fática a intenção de respeitar as regras em vigor. Como tal, esta ANA GOMES - BREXIT: A RESSACA PÁG. 2 atitude agora adoptada pelas instâncias europeias releva de um fundamentalismo a todos os títulos condenável e especialmen- CARLOS ZORRINHO - COMBATER te impróprio no contexto da profunda crise existencial que afec- ta a União Europeia. Esperemos que no final acabe, apesar de O “DEFICIT DEMOCRÁTICO” NA UE PÁG.
  • Regional Alliances

    Regional Alliances

    101-06c Advocacy plan: Regional Alliances Regional Alliances - Advocacy Strategy 2020-2022 Please note: this strategy is a living document and needs further elaboration and thought. It will also need to be updated based on political opportunities that arise in the upcoming months and years until the end of 2022. 1. Advocacy issue 1.1. Definition of the problem: what is the problem? What are the root causes? Who is affected? What are the implications? In a world filled with new threats and opportunities, the European Union, as an actor on the world stage, needs to consolidate relations with its closest partners. The EU is a power that seeks to safeguard its interests vis-à-vis other big players in international relations in full respect of international law and its own values. Ursula von der Leyen, presenting for the first time her College of Commissioners said “My Commission will be a geopolitical Commission committed to sustainable policies. And I want the European Union to be the guardian of multilateralism. Because we know that we are stronger by doing together what we cannot do alone". A significant change in the new EC set up is the replacement of the ‘Development’ Commissioner with a Commissioner for ‘International Partnerships’, and it is unclear whether this marks a linguistic or substantive change. The emphasis on ‘partnerships’ rather than ‘development’ potentially signals a shift away from traditional donor/recipient relations and in this context CONCORD (with its members) must influence the EC interpretation of “international partnership” making sure that it won’t be exclusively focused on business, trade, growth, investment relations but that instead it will prioritise the wellbeing of people and planet and the fight against inequalities, promoting clear commitments towards a fairer and more sustainable world.
  • Mapa De Poder Na Rede EN 31Marco V3

    Mapa De Poder Na Rede EN 31Marco V3

    PORTUGAL TOP 50: MAP OF POWER ON THE NET Influential Politicians in Twitter March 2015 BARCELONA | BOGOTÁ | BUENOS AIRES | LIMA | LISBOA | MADRID | MÉXICO | PANAMÁ | QUITO | RÍO DE JANEIRO | SÃO PAULO | SANTIAGO DE CHILE | SANTO DOMINGO Elaborado por TOP 50 DUARTE MARQUES MAP 45 LÍDIA BULCÃO DIOGO FEIO RUI 28 49 OF POWER MOREIRA JORGE SEGURO FILIPE SANTOS MARISA MATIAS SANCHES 29 HENRIQUES 47 LUÍS VALES PEDRO 11 27 PASSOS COELHO 12 ON THE NET PAULO PEDROSO ANTÓNIO FILIPE 13 MÁRIO RUIVO 30 7 CATARINA MARTINS Influential Politicians 44 CARLOS 10 COELHO in Twitter 14 ANTÓNIO JOSÉ SEGURO JOANA PORTUGAL - March 2015 33 AMARAL DIAS MICHAEL RUI TAVARES 8 SEUFERT TOP 50 RANKING Map of Power on the DANIEL 25 MIGUEL TIAGO OLIVEIRA 3 Net - Influential Politicians in Twitter is 16 1 the result of the research work by IMAGO - LLORENTE & CUENCA to PEDRO MOTA identify, measure, and compare the SOARES 32 9 EDITE ESTRELA level of influence held by the main Por- tuguese politicians in the digital arena. ANÍBAL 15 MARIA GRAÇA CARVALHO CAVACO SILVA 26 The research conducted took as its MAP OF starting point the premise that Twitter - INFLUENCE INFLUENCE + INFLUENCE + INFLUENCE INFLUENCE - INFLUENCE is the maximum example of online in- fluence - an open space where informa- 0 25 50 75 POWER 75 50 25 0 tion is public, in which relationships are JOSÉ GUSMÃO 34 50 established and ideas spread more PEDRO SANTANA LOPES concisely and quickly than on any other 42 ADOLFO social network. MESQUITA NUNES NUNO MELO 48 24 GARCIA PEREIRA Is there any link between online pres- ANTÓNIO 31 ANA 6 ence and influence outside the Inter- PRÔA GOMES net? Should personal online assets be 41 RUI RIO explored by politicians as mechanisms JOSÉ 17 to approach their voters? These and JUNQUEIRO 4 23 LUIS MENEZES other questions are discussed in this 2 CARLOS study.
  • List of Members of the European Parliament, 2014–2019

    List of Members of the European Parliament, 2014–2019

    List of members of the European Parliament, 2014–2019 Below is a list of Members of the European Parliament serving in the eighth term (2014–2019). It is sorted by an English perception of surname treating all variations of de/di/do, van/von, Ó/Ní, and so forth as part of the collation key, even if this is not the normal practice in a member's own country. During the 2014–19 term, there are 751 members of parliament divided among the 28 member states. Contents List of members Austria Belgium Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Results of the election: Finland GUE/NGL G-EFA EPP EFDD France S&D ALDE ECR NI Germany Greece Hungary Ireland Italy Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Poland Portugal Romania Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden United Kingdom Members of the European Parliament who are also citizen of a non-EU country Notes See also List of members Austria On the Austrian People's Party list: (EPP Group) On the Freedom Party list: (Non-inscrits, since 15 June 2015 ENF) 1. Othmar Karas 2. Elisabeth Köstinger – until 8 November 1. Harald Vilimsky 2017[1] 2. Franz Obermayr Lukas Mandl – since 30 November 2017 3. Georg Mayer 3. Paul Rübig 4. Barbara Kappel 4. Claudia Schmidt On The Greens – The Green Alternative list: (Greens- 5. Heinz K. Becker EFA) On the Social Democratic Party of Austria list: (S&D) 1. Ulrike Lunacek – until 8 November 2017[3] 1. Eugen Freund Thomas Waitz – since 10 November 2017 2. Evelyn Regner 2. Michel Reimon 3. Jörg Leichtfried – until 23 June 2015[2] 3.
  • Co-Rapporteurs: Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Siegfried Mureşan, Dragoș Pîslaru) Vote on the Text As Amended

    Co-Rapporteurs: Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Siegfried Mureşan, Dragoș Pîslaru) Vote on the Text As Amended

    Establishing a Recovery and Resilience Facility (co-rapporteurs: Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Siegfried Mureşan, Dragoș Pîslaru) Vote on the text as amended 73 + EPP Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Stefan Berger, Lefteris Christoforou, Markus Ferber, José Manuel Fernandes, Frances Fitzgerald, José Manuel García-Margallo y Marfil, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Niclas Herbst, Monika Hohlmeier, Danuta Maria Hübner, Othmar Karas, Georgios Kyrtsos, Janusz Lewandowski, Aušra Maldeikienė, Siegfried Mureşan, Luděk Niedermayer, Andrey Novakov, Jan Olbrycht, Lídia Pereira, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Karlo Ressler, Ralf Seekatz, Inese Vaidere, Rainer Wieland, Angelika Winzig S&D Marek Belka, Robert Biedroń, Paolo De Castro, Jonás Fernández, Niels Fuglsang, Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Elisabetta Gualmini, Eero Heinäluoma, Eva Kaili, Aurore Lalucq, Pierre Larrouturou, Margarida Marques, Pedro Marques, Costas Mavrides, Csaba Molnár, Victor Negrescu, Evelyn Regner, Pedro Silva Pereira, Paul Tang, Irene Tinagli, Nils Ušakovs RENEW Gilles Boyer, Olivier Chastel, Luis Garicano, Valérie Hayer, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Moritz Körner, Ondřej Kovařík, Dragoș Pîslaru, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Nils Torvalds, Stéphanie Yon-Courtin GREENS/EFA Rasmus Andresen, Damian Boeselager, David Cormand, Alexandra Geese, Sven Giegold, Claude Gruffat, Stasys Jakeliūnas, Philippe Lamberts, Kira Marie Peter-Hansen, Ernest Urtasun ECR Johan Van Overtveldt EUL/NGL Younous Omarjee, Dimitrios Papadimoulis NI Piernicola Pedicini 11 - EPP Enikő Győri RENEW Engin Eroglu, Caroline Nagtegaal ID Gerolf Annemans, Gunnar Beck, Francesca Donato, Joachim Kuhs, Jörg Meuthen ECR Derk Jan Eppink, Patryk Jaki NI Lefteris Nikolaou-Alavanos 15 0 S&D Alfred Sant ID Anna Bonfrisco, Valentino Grant, Hélène Laporte, Antonio Maria Rinaldi, Marco Zanni ECR Raffaele Fitto, Zbigniew Kuźmiuk, Bogdan Rzońca, Cristian Terheş, Roberts Zīle EUL/NGL Manon Aubry, José Gusmão, Martin Schirdewan NI Mislav Kolakušić Corrections to votes and voting intentions + - 0 Francesca Donato Key to symbols: + : in favour - : against 0 : abstention.
  • En En Amendments 1

    En En Amendments 1

    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Foreign Affairs 2020/2012(INL) 11.5.2020 AMENDMENTS 1 - 134 Draft opinion Urmas Paet (PE650.401v01-00) Framework of ethical aspects of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies (2020/2012(INL)) AM\1204768EN.docx PE650.709v01-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_LegOpinion PE650.709v01-00 2/75 AM\1204768EN.docx EN Amendment 1 Anna Fotyga on behalf of the ECR Group Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Draft opinion Amendment 1. Highlights that the security and 1. Highlights that the security and defence policies of the European Union defence policies of the European Union and its Member States are guided by the and its Member States are guided by the principles of the United Nations Charter, principles of the United Nations Charter, and by a common understanding of the and by a common understanding of the universal values of the inviolable and universal values of the inviolable and inalienable rights of the human person, of inalienable rights of the human person, of freedom, of democracy, of equality and of freedom, of democracy, of equality and of the rule of law; highlights that all defence- the rule of law; highlights that all defence- related efforts within the Union framework related efforts within the Union framework respect these universal values whilst respect these universal values whilst promoting peace, security and progress in promoting peace, security and progress in Europe and in the world; Europe and in the world; recognises that the primary guarantor of Euro-Atlantic security is NATO and that decision making related to AI regulations must be made in close cooperation with Member States, the North Atlantic Council and likeminded partners as the U.S., U.K.
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Results

    European Parliament Elections 2019 - Results

    Briefing June 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Results Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 7 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 3 seats 2 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Heinz Christian Strache 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide 6. Alexander Bernhuber 7. Barbara Thaler NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 1. Maria Arena* Socialist Party (PS) Christian Social Party 3. Johan Van Overtveldt 2. Marc Tarabella* (S&D) 2 seats (CSP) (EPP) 1 seat New Flemish Alliance (N-VA) 1. Olivier Chastel (Greens/EFA) Reformist 2. Frédérique Ries* 4 seats Movement (MR) (ALDE) 2 seats 1. Philippe Lamberts* 2. Saskia Bricmont 1. Guy Verhofstadt* Ecolo (Greens/EFA) 2. Hilde Vautmans* 2 seats Open Flemish Liberals and Democrats (Open 1. Benoît Lutgen Humanist VLD) (ALDE) 2 seats democratic centre (cdH) (EPP) 1 seat 1. Kris Peeters Workers’ Party of 1.