DOCSLIB.ORG

En En Amendments 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
En En Amendments 1 European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Foreign Affairs 2020/2012(INL) 11.5.2020 AMENDMENTS 1 - 134 Draft opinion Urmas Paet (PE650.401v01-00) Framework of ethical aspects of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies (2020/2012(INL)) AM\1204768EN.docx PE650.709v01-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_LegOpinion PE650.709v01-00 2/75 AM\1204768EN.docx EN Amendment 1 Anna Fotyga on behalf of the ECR Group Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Draft opinion Amendment 1. Highlights that the security and 1. Highlights that the security and defence policies of the European Union defence policies of the European Union and its Member States are guided by the and its Member States are guided by the principles of the United Nations Charter, principles of the United Nations Charter, and by a common understanding of the and by a common understanding of the universal values of the inviolable and universal values of the inviolable and inalienable rights of the human person, of inalienable rights of the human person, of freedom, of democracy, of equality and of freedom, of democracy, of equality and of the rule of law; highlights that all defence- the rule of law; highlights that all defence- related efforts within the Union framework related efforts within the Union framework respect these universal values whilst respect these universal values whilst promoting peace, security and progress in promoting peace, security and progress in Europe and in the world; Europe and in the world; recognises that the primary guarantor of Euro-Atlantic security is NATO and that decision making related to AI regulations must be made in close cooperation with Member States, the North Atlantic Council and likeminded partners as the U.S., U.K. Canada or Japan; Is of the opinion that the use of AI should be based on common set of ethical principles: responsible, equitable, traceable, reliable, and governable; Or. en Amendment 2 Sven Mikser, Javi López, Raphaël Glucksmann, Nacho Sánchez Amor, Eva Kaili, Claudiu Manda, Giuliano Pisapia, Attila Ara-Kovács, Andreas Schieder, Juozas Olekas, Isabel Santos, Tonino Picula Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Draft opinion Amendment 1. Highlights that the security and 1. Highlights that the security and AM\1204768EN.docx 3/75 PE650.709v01-00 EN defence policies of the European Union defence policies of the European Union and its Member States are guided by the and its Member States are guided by the principles of the United Nations Charter, principles enshrined in the European and by a common understanding of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and those universal values of the inviolable and of the United Nations Charter, and by a inalienable rights of the human person, of common understanding of the universal freedom, of democracy, of equality and of values of the inviolable and inalienable the rule of law; highlights that all defence- rights of the human person, of freedom, of related efforts within the Union framework democracy, of equality and of the rule of respect these universal values whilst law; highlights that all defence-related promoting peace, security and progress in efforts within the Union framework must Europe and in the world; respect these universal values whilst promoting peace, security and progress in Europe and in the world; Or. en Amendment 3 Miriam Lexmann, Tomáš Zdechovský, Michaela Šojdrová, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, François-Xavier Bellamy, Andrius Kubilius, Lukas Mandl Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Draft opinion Amendment 1. Highlights that the security and 1. Highlights that the security and defence policies of the European Union defence policies of the European Union and its Member States are guided by the and its Member States are guided by the principles of the United Nations Charter, principles of the United Nations Charter, and by a common understanding of the and by a common understanding of the universal values of the inviolable and universal values of the inviolable and inalienable rights of the human person, of inalienable rights of the human person, of freedom, of democracy, of equality and of human dignity, of freedom, of democracy, the rule of law; highlights that all defence- of equality and of the rule of law; related efforts within the Union framework highlights that all defence-related efforts respect these universal values whilst within the Union framework respect these promoting peace, security and progress in universal values whilst promoting peace, Europe and in the world; security and progress in Europe and in the world; Or. en Amendment 4 Lukas Mandl PE650.709v01-00 4/75 AM\1204768EN.docx EN Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Draft opinion Amendment 1. Highlights that the security and 1. Highlights that the security and defence policies of the European Union defence policies of the European Union and its Member States are guided by the and its Member States are guided by the principles of the United Nations Charter, principles of the United Nations Charter, and by a common understanding of the and by a common understanding of the universal values of the inviolable and universal values of the inviolable and inalienable rights of the human person, of inalienable rights of the human person, of freedom, of democracy, of equality and of freedom, of democracy, of equality and of the rule of law; highlights that all defence- the rule of law; highlights that all defence- related efforts within the Union framework related efforts within the Union framework respect these universal values whilst must respect these universal values whilst promoting peace, security and progress in promoting peace, security and progress in Europe and in the world; Europe and in the world; Or. en Amendment 5 Kinga Gál Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) Draft opinion Amendment 1a. Underlines the opportunities offered by artificial intelligence, already having an impact on our world in many different ways; artificial intelligence has the potential to become the engine of productivity and economic growth; it has the ability to increase the efficiency with which things are done and improve the decision-making process by analysing large amounts of data; emphasizing in the same time the need to maintain at all times the responsible human monitoring and control in relation to artificial intelligence systems; Or. en AM\1204768EN.docx 5/75 PE650.709v01-00 EN Amendment 6 Nathalie Loiseau, Klemen Grošelj, Javier Nart, Bernard Guetta, Petras Auštrevičius, Christophe Grudler, Bart Groothuis Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) Draft opinion Amendment 1a. Welcomes the endorsement, by the 2019 Meeting of High Contracting Parties to the United Nations Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW), of 11 Guiding Principles for the development and use of autonomous weapons systems; Or. en Amendment 7 Sven Mikser, Raphaël Glucksmann, Javi López, Nacho Sánchez Amor, Eva Kaili, Claudiu Manda, Giuliano Pisapia, Attila Ara-Kovács, Andreas Schieder, Juozas Olekas, Isabel Santos, Tonino Picula, Robert Biedroń Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Draft opinion Amendment 2. Stresses that a Union framework 2. Stresses that a Union framework regulating the use of artificial intelligence regulating the use of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled systems in defence must (AI)-enabled systems in defence must respect all applicable legal regimes, in respect all applicable legal regimes, in particular the international humanitarian particular the international humanitarian law and the international human rights law, law and the international human rights law, and be in compliance with Union law, and be in compliance with Union law, principles and values; calls on the Union to principles and values; stresses that the EU assess the inherent AI-related risks with should play a global role in leading the regard to the application of Union law, and way towards a credible and binding AI foresee necessary adjustment and regulatory agenda rooted in democratic enforcement where needed; values; calls on the Union to assess the inherent AI-related risks with regard to the application of Union law, and foresee necessary adjustment and enforcement where needed; underlines that emerging technologies not covered by international PE650.709v01-00 6/75 AM\1204768EN.docx EN law should be judged by the principle of humanity and the dictates of public conscience; underlines that the ethics of AI-enabled systems in defence must be assessed from the point of view of Human rights, and notably human safety, health and security, freedom, privacy, integrity and dignity; Or. en Amendment 8 Anna Fotyga on behalf of the ECR Group Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Draft opinion Amendment 2. Stresses that a Union framework 2. Stresses that a Union framework regulating the use of artificial intelligence regulating the use of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled systems in defence must (AI)-enabled systems in defence, both in respect all applicable legal regimes, in combat and noncombat situations, must particular the international humanitarian respect all applicable legal regimes, in law and the international human rights law, particular the international humanitarian and be in compliance with Union law, law and the international human rights law, principles and values; calls on the Union to and be in compliance with Union law, assess the inherent AI-related risks with principles and values; calls on the Union to regard to the application of Union law, and assess the inherent AI-related risks with foresee necessary adjustment and regard to the application of Union law, and enforcement where needed; suggest
Load more

Recommended publications
  • European Parliament 2019-2024
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ITRE_PV(2019)0925_1 MINUTES Meeting of 25 September 2019, 9.00-12.30 and 14.30-18.30 BRUSSELS 25 September 2019, 9.00 – 10.00 In camera 1. Coordinators’ meeting The Coordinators’ meeting was held from 9.00 to 10.00 in camera with Adina-Ioana Vălean (Chair) in the chair. (See Annex I) * * * The meeting opened at 10.04 on Wednesday, 25 September 2019, with Adina-Ioana Vălean (Chair) presiding. 2. Adoption of agenda The agenda was adopted. PV\1189744EN.docx PE641.355 EN United in diversityEN 3. Chair’s announcements Chair’s announcements concerning coordinators’ decisions of 3 September 2019. Chair has informed the Committee members that the Committee meeting of 7-8 October has been cancelled due to the Commissioner hearing. The next ITRE Committee meeting will take place on the 17 October 2019. 4. Approval of minutes of meetings 2-3 September 2019 PV – PE641.070v01-00 The minutes were approved. *** Electronic vote *** 5. Establishing the European Cybersecurity Industrial, Technology and Research Competence Centre and the Network of National Coordination Centres ITRE/9/01206 ***I 2018/0328(COD) COM(2018)0630 – C8-0404/2018 Rapporteur: Rasmus Andresen (Verts/ALE) Responsible: ITRE Vote on the decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations The decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations was adopted: for: 49; against: 12; abstention: 2. (Due to technical issues, roll-call page is not available) 6. Labelling of tyres with respect to fuel efficiency and other essential parameters ITRE/9/01207 ***I 2018/0148(COD) COM(2018)0296 – C8-0190/2018 Rapporteur: Michał Boni Responsible: ITRE Vote on the decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations The decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations was adopted: for: 56; against: 3; abstention: 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to EU Telecom and Trade Ministers and to European Commissioners Thierry Breton, Margrethe Vestager and Valdis Dombrovskis
    Letter to EU telecom and trade ministers and to European Commissioners Thierry Breton, Margrethe Vestager and Valdis Dombrovskis We, the undersigned Members of the European Parliament from five different political groups, share a common concern regarding 5G security in Europe and unfair competition between European and Chinese 5G vendors. Therefore, we send this letter to you in preparation of the upcoming informal TTE Council on 15 October, urging you to take action on the points raised. We have learnt from the COVID-19 crisis that maintaining know-how, capacity and some level of independence in critical sectors, including medical/pharmaceutical, food supplies, and utilities, i.e. energy, water and communications infrastructure is indispensable for our survival. In the area of connectivity, COVID-19 has demonstrated how vital fixed and mobile connectivity is to help fight the crisis and to keep the economy and essential services running to the extent possible. The European Commission has, already pre-crisis, launched a number of initiatives to preserve our security and sovereignty, which today prove to be more relevant than ever before. These include a renewed industrial strategy with digitization and connectivity at its heart, increased funding proposals for connectivity, cyber security and AI, the investment screening framework to avoid harmful foreign take-overs of critical EU businesses, trade policy initiatives promoting reciprocity, and more concretely, the 5G security joint risk assessment and toolbox of mitigating measures. 5G is a central element in Europe’s digital sovereignty and the EU 5G security initiative rightly has the aim of safeguarding the security of 5G as a critical infrastructure for Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Should the EU Introduce Minimum Standards for the Implementation of the Youth Guarantees?
    Should the EU oppose the introduction of minimum standards for the implementation of the youth guarantees? The vote of the MEPs Social policy mostly remains a competence of the Member States of the European Union. However, in some occasions, the European Commission managed to set common frameworks for labor and social standards in the EU. A resolution approved by the European Parliament called on the European Commission to propose a European legal framework introducing minimum standards for the implementation of the youth guarantees, including the quality of apprenticeships, decent wages for young people and access to employment services. However, the Conservative and Eurocritic group ECR rejected this proposal and tried to delete this provision from the text. Ultimately, most MEPs supported the call for a common European framework on this matter and only ECR, ENF and part of EFDD supported the amendment against the minimum standards. The Greeks were also on the same page as the majority of the EU Parliament, with a majority supporting the European legal framework for youth employment. The support came from the loyal members of the EPP (New Democracy), with one exception of Georgios Kyrtsos, who decided to abstain (he did not vote in the plenary, but he eventually notified his intention to abstain). Similarly the leftist members of S&D and DISTRIBUTION OF GREEK POLITICAL PARTIES IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT IN 2016 GUE-NGL supported the provision as well as Non- Inscrits: European the members of the Communist Party of KKE, Golden United Left- Greece. Interestingly, Eva Kaili from PASOK Dawn Nordic Green Left: voted against it.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Members of the European Parliament, 2014–2019
    List of members of the European Parliament, 2014–2019 Below is a list of Members of the European Parliament serving in the eighth term (2014–2019). It is sorted by an English perception of surname treating all variations of de/di/do, van/von, Ó/Ní, and so forth as part of the collation key, even if this is not the normal practice in a member's own country. During the 2014–19 term, there are 751 members of parliament divided among the 28 member states. Contents List of members Austria Belgium Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Results of the election: Finland GUE/NGL G-EFA EPP EFDD France S&D ALDE ECR NI Germany Greece Hungary Ireland Italy Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Poland Portugal Romania Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden United Kingdom Members of the European Parliament who are also citizen of a non-EU country Notes See also List of members Austria On the Austrian People's Party list: (EPP Group) On the Freedom Party list: (Non-inscrits, since 15 June 2015 ENF) 1. Othmar Karas 2. Elisabeth Köstinger – until 8 November 1. Harald Vilimsky 2017[1] 2. Franz Obermayr Lukas Mandl – since 30 November 2017 3. Georg Mayer 3. Paul Rübig 4. Barbara Kappel 4. Claudia Schmidt On The Greens – The Green Alternative list: (Greens- 5. Heinz K. Becker EFA) On the Social Democratic Party of Austria list: (S&D) 1. Ulrike Lunacek – until 8 November 2017[3] 1. Eugen Freund Thomas Waitz – since 10 November 2017 2. Evelyn Regner 2. Michel Reimon 3. Jörg Leichtfried – until 23 June 2015[2] 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Rapporteurs: Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Siegfried Mureşan, Dragoș Pîslaru) Vote on the Text As Amended
    Establishing a Recovery and Resilience Facility (co-rapporteurs: Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Siegfried Mureşan, Dragoș Pîslaru) Vote on the text as amended 73 + EPP Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Stefan Berger, Lefteris Christoforou, Markus Ferber, José Manuel Fernandes, Frances Fitzgerald, José Manuel García-Margallo y Marfil, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Niclas Herbst, Monika Hohlmeier, Danuta Maria Hübner, Othmar Karas, Georgios Kyrtsos, Janusz Lewandowski, Aušra Maldeikienė, Siegfried Mureşan, Luděk Niedermayer, Andrey Novakov, Jan Olbrycht, Lídia Pereira, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Karlo Ressler, Ralf Seekatz, Inese Vaidere, Rainer Wieland, Angelika Winzig S&D Marek Belka, Robert Biedroń, Paolo De Castro, Jonás Fernández, Niels Fuglsang, Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Elisabetta Gualmini, Eero Heinäluoma, Eva Kaili, Aurore Lalucq, Pierre Larrouturou, Margarida Marques, Pedro Marques, Costas Mavrides, Csaba Molnár, Victor Negrescu, Evelyn Regner, Pedro Silva Pereira, Paul Tang, Irene Tinagli, Nils Ušakovs RENEW Gilles Boyer, Olivier Chastel, Luis Garicano, Valérie Hayer, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Moritz Körner, Ondřej Kovařík, Dragoș Pîslaru, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Nils Torvalds, Stéphanie Yon-Courtin GREENS/EFA Rasmus Andresen, Damian Boeselager, David Cormand, Alexandra Geese, Sven Giegold, Claude Gruffat, Stasys Jakeliūnas, Philippe Lamberts, Kira Marie Peter-Hansen, Ernest Urtasun ECR Johan Van Overtveldt EUL/NGL Younous Omarjee, Dimitrios Papadimoulis NI Piernicola Pedicini 11 - EPP Enikő Győri RENEW Engin Eroglu, Caroline Nagtegaal ID Gerolf Annemans, Gunnar Beck, Francesca Donato, Joachim Kuhs, Jörg Meuthen ECR Derk Jan Eppink, Patryk Jaki NI Lefteris Nikolaou-Alavanos 15 0 S&D Alfred Sant ID Anna Bonfrisco, Valentino Grant, Hélène Laporte, Antonio Maria Rinaldi, Marco Zanni ECR Raffaele Fitto, Zbigniew Kuźmiuk, Bogdan Rzońca, Cristian Terheş, Roberts Zīle EUL/NGL Manon Aubry, José Gusmão, Martin Schirdewan NI Mislav Kolakušić Corrections to votes and voting intentions + - 0 Francesca Donato Key to symbols: + : in favour - : against 0 : abstention.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Minutes
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ITRE_PV(2021)0413_1 MINUTES Meeting of 13 April 2021, 9.00-12.00 and 13.45-15.45 BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 9.05 on Tuesday, 13 April 2021, with Cristian-Silviu Buşoi, (Chair) presiding. 1. Adoption of agenda ITRE_OJ(2021)0413_1 The agenda was adopted. 2. Chair's announcements The meeting was webstreamed. Interpretation is available in FR, DE, IT, NL, EN, EL, ES, PT, FI, SV, PL, RO and BG. During the morning session of the meeting (9.00-12.00), interpretation will be also available in DA, CS, HU and HR. *** Vote open until 11.00 *** 3. Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination ITRE/9/03005 ***II 2018/0224(COD) 07064/2/2020 – C9-0111/2021 PV\1231624EN.docx PE692.839v01-00 EN United in diversityEN T8-0395/2019 – T8-0509/2018 Rapporteur: Dan Nica (S&D) Responsible: ITRE Opinions: JURI (AJ) Adoption of draft recommendation for second reading The draft recommendation for second reading was adopted: for: 77; against: 0; abstentions: 4. (Roll-call see page 8) 4. Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing the specific programme implementing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation ITRE/9/03006 * 2018/0225(CNS) COM(2018)0436 – C8-0253/2018 Rapporteur: Christian Ehler (PPE) Responsible: ITRE Opinions: JURI (AJ) Adoption of draft report The draft report was adopted: for: 73, against:0, abstentions: 3 (Roll-call see page 8) 5.
    [Show full text]
  • PR Prometheus ENG 14 10 2020
    PRESS RELEASE HERE IS PROMETHEUS, A SOUTHERN EUROPEAN VOICE TO SHAPE THE EU DIGITAL AGENDA • The Digital Conference that took place yesterday marked the debut on the EU stage of PromethEUs, a new network of four think tanks committed to bringing a Southern European perspective into the EU-wide debate on the digital revolution • The event provided a forum to debate on the two major EU digital policy initiatives of the coming years: the AI legislative framework and the Digital Services Act • The conference gave the floor to 20 high-level speakers, including EU and national key decision-makers, and brought together more than 100 stakeholders from Brussels and the national capitals Brussels, 14/10/2020 PromethEUs - a new network of four Southern European think tanks – marked its debut on the EU stage hosting yesterday its first Digital Conference, entitled “A new framework for Europe’s digital rules. Leading the path towards AI and digital services revolution”. As the European Commission is preparing to put on the table in the coming months two of the main legislative packages of the current institutional cycle – the Artificial Intelligence legislative framework and the Digital Services Act – and the debate on those issues has been intensifying within the European Institutions and in the national capitals, PromethEUs provided a forum for an open and high-level discussion in order to take stock of the Commission’s Digital Strategy in view of the next institutional steps. The conference gave the floor to 20 high-level speakers, including EU and national key decision- makers, and brought together more than 100 stakeholders from Brussels and the national capitals, including representatives from EU and national institutions, research and business organisations, trade and consumer associations and other relevant stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Protokół Posiedzenia W Dniu 27 Listopada 2019 R. (2021/C 203/03)
    28.5.2021 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej C 203/155 Środa, 27 listopada 2019 r. PROTOKÓŁ POSIEDZENIA W DNIU 27 LISTOPADA 2019 R. (2021/C 203/03) Spis treści Strona 1. Otwarcie posiedzenia . 157 2. Debata nad przypadkami łamania praw człowieka, zasad demokracji i państwa prawa (ogłoszenie złożonych 157 projektów rezolucji) . 3. Przedstawienie kolegium komisarzy i ich programu przez nowo wybraną przewodniczącą Komisji (debata) 158 4. Wznowienie posiedzenia . 159 5. Oficjalne powitanie . 159 6. Głosowanie . 159 6.1. Wybór Komisji (głosowanie) . 160 6.2. Uruchomienie Funduszu Solidarności Unii Europejskiej w celu udzielenia pomocy Grecji 160 (głosowanie) . 6.3. Uruchomienie instrumentu elastyczności na sfinansowanie natychmiastowych środków budżeto- wych służących do rozwiązywania bieżących problemów wynikających z migracji, napływu 160 uchodźców i zagrożeń bezpieczeństwa (głosowanie) . 6.4. Uruchomienie Funduszu Solidarności Unii Europejskiej w celu zapewnienia środków na wypłatę 161 zaliczek w budżecie ogólnym Unii na 2020 r. (głosowanie) . 6.5. Procedura budżetowa 2020: wspólny projekt (głosowanie) . 161 7. Wyjaśnienia dotyczące stanowiska zajętego w głosowaniu . 161 8. Korekty oddanych głosów i zgłoszenia zamiaru oddania głosu . 162 9. Wznowienie posiedzenia . 162 10. Zatwierdzenie protokołu poprzedniego posiedzenia . 162 11. Akty delegowane (art. 111 ust. 2 Regulaminu) . 162 12. Środki wykonawcze (art. 112 Regulaminu) . 163 13. Składanie dokumentów . 163 14. Przesunięcia środków i decyzje budżetowe . 164 15. Ingerencja innych państw w nasze procesy demokratyczne i wyborcze (debata na aktualny temat) . 164 C 203/156 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej 28.5.2021 Środa, 27 listopada 2019 r. Spis treści Strona 16. Sytuacja w krajach sąsiedztwa wschodniego (debata) . 165 17. Sytuacja w Izraelu i Palestynie, w tym w osiedlach żydowskich (debata) .
    [Show full text]
  • The Manifesto for Fair Internships
    Manifesto for #FairInternships We support the call of the Global Intern Strike for equal access to fair, quality internships for ALL young people. ● Equality: Internships need to be paid so that they are accessible to all, regardless of socio-economic background. ● Fairness: Interns must have basic employment rights such as protection from harassment and fair working conditions. ● Quality: Internships should offer meaningful learning experiences that help young people successfully transition from education to employment. We believe that all EU institutions should ban unpaid internships. ● We call all EU institutions to take the necessary steps to provide quality and well remunerated internships to ALL its interns and to stop offering unpaid internships altogether and avoid having a parallel system of less regulated internships aside from their regular internship program. ● We call the European Ombudsman to continue investigating the situation of unpaid interns in EU institutions after its recommendation on the EEAS practice of offering unpaid internships offered in EU delegations. To this end, the European Parliament should change its rules governing internships offered by MEP’s and political groups, taking into account the following demands: ● Pay trainees in in MEP offices or political groups a decent remuneration at a similar level as the Schuman trainees! The remuneration should cover living expenses in Brussels or the city where the traineeship is undertaken. The remuneration needs to be clearly included in the trainee’s contract. If provided by another institution, this needs to be documented and included in the trainee’s contract. ● Fix the standard duration of traineeships to 6 months and limit the maximum duration to 12 months.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Amendment
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Industry, Research and Energy 2016/0402(COD) 25.9.2017 AMENDMENT 12 - 61 Draft opinion Maria Spyraki (PE601.268v01-00) on the proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the legal and operational framework of the European services e-card introduced by Regulation....[ESC Regulation].... Proposal for a directive (COM(2016)0823 – C8-0013/2017 – 2016/0402(COD)) AM\1135074EN.docx PE601.269v01-00 EN United in diversity EN AM_Com_LegOpinion PE601.269v01-00 2/31 AM\1135074EN.docx EN Amendment 12 Markus Pieper, Markus Ferber, Sven Schulze Proposal for a directive – Proposal for a rejection The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy calls on the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, as the committee responsible, to propose rejection of the Commission proposal. Or. de Justification Alle sinnvollen Bemühungen zur Vollendung des Binnenmarkts sind ausdrücklich zu unterstützen. Die Einführung einer elektronischen EU-Dienstleistungskarte, so wie es der Vorschlag vorsieht, würde jedoch unnötigerweise zusätzliche Bürokratie, Schaffung von Doppelstrukturen und Mehrkosten nicht für die Mitgliedstaaten sondern auch für die potentiellen Adressaten wie beispielsweise Architekten, Ingenieure oder bauhandwerkliche Dienstleister bedeuten. Gleichzeitig verwässert der Vorschlag den in der Dienstleistungsrichtlinie (2006/123/EG) etablierten Grundsatz der Geltung des Rechts des Ortes, an dem die Wertschöpfung erfolgt. Wogegen die möglichen Vorteile einer solchen Karte nicht ausreichend deutlich sind. Im Ergebnis würde das Ziel der verbesserten Mobilität der Dienstleister im Binnenmarkt möglicherweise konterkariert werden. Es sind noch zu viele Fragen bei der Umsetzung ungenügend oder gar nicht geklärt, sodass weitere Konsultationen der Betroffenen durchgeführt und der Vorschlag überarbeitet werden sollte.
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary of Activities in 2019
    EU40 ANNUAL REPORT A SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES IN 2019 We bring together young MEPs from the 4 main political groups and empower them with a platform to further their agenda on topics of their Let's talk interest. We create a safe space where MEPs can thrive, and bond with each other across party lines! OVER 20 SUCCESSFUL PROJECTS WE REBUILT THE ACROSS EU40 NETWORK PARTY LINES 2019 SAW A NEW Met 1-1 with over 65 MEPs We have facilitated great EUROPEAN to understand their initiatives for the MEPs in PARLIAMENT political agenda and the network with civil COME TO LIFE priorities and welcome society, the European Commission and various over 60% of the newly them into our network industry stakeholders elected MEPs are newcomers! Meet Our Board EVA KAILI MEP TOMISLAV SOKOL MEP President Secretary General LUKAS MANDL SARA CERDAS MONICA SEMEDO NICOLAE MEP MEP MEP STEFANUTA MEP Executive Board Executive Board Executive Board Executive Board Member Member Member Member KEY 2019 PROJECTS FOR THE NETWORK! KEY MOMENTS IN A NUTSHELL WITH OVER 15 ATTENDING MEPS AND OVER 150 EU PROFESSIONALS FROM THE PARLIAMENT, COMMISSION AND COUNCIL Summer BBQ A SPACE TO MINGLE AND GET FAMILIAR WITH THE BRUSSELS BUBBLE AND OFFICIALS FROM THE EU COMMISSION September 2019 - London Brasserie AND COUNCIL Brussels AN EVENING TO CELEBRATE OUR COMMITMENT TO WORK AND SUPPORT THE WORK OF MEPS FOR A BETTER EUROPE Further information here EU40 MEPS MEET MICHEL BARNIER Chief EU Negotiator for Brexit Eva Kaili MEP November 2019 - EU40 Office Monica Semedo MEP A frank conversation with Josianne Cutajar MEP Seb Dance MEP Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Minutes
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Industry, Research and Energy Committee on Transport and Tourism CJ05_PV(2021)0624_1 MINUTES Meeting of 24 June 2021, 16.30-16.45 BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 16.32 on Thursday, 24 June 2021, with Cristian-Silviu Buşoi (ITRE Chair) presiding. 1. Adoption of agenda The agenda was adopted in the form shown in these minutes. 2. Chair’s announcements None. 3. Approval of minutes of meetings 15 April 2021 PV – PE691.403v01-00 The minutes were approved. ***Remote voting procedure*** 4. Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility CJ05/9/01732 Rapporteurs Henna Virkkunen (PPE) Marian-Jean Marinescu (PPE) Dominique Riquet (Renew) PV\1237092EN.docx PE696.324v01-00 EN United in diversityEN Adoption of draft recommendation for second reading The draft recommendation was adopted: in favour: 90; against: 19; abstentions: 6. (Roll-call see page 4) All Members taking part in the vote - via remote participation - voted using EPvote. Members could send their ballot papers until 18.30. ***End of Remote Voting Procedure*** 5. Any other business. None. The meeting closed at 16.36. PE696.324v01-00 2/9 PV\1237092EN.docx EN Results of roll-call votes Contents 1. Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility – 2018/0228(COD) – Rapporteurs: Henna Virkkunen (EPP), Marian-Jean Marinescu (EPP), Dominique Riquet (Renew) - Joint committee procedure (Rule 58) ITRE-TRAN ............................................................................4 1.1. Vote on draft recommendation for second reading ..................................................4 Key to symbols: + : in favour - : against 0 : abstention PV\1237092EN.docx 3/9 PE696.324v01-00 EN 1. Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility – 2018/0228(COD) – Rapporteurs: Henna Virkkunen (EPP), Marian-Jean Marinescu (EPP), Dominique Riquet (Renew) - Joint committee procedure (Rule 58) ITRE-TRAN 1.1.
    [Show full text]