Additional Historical Fisheries Information From

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Additional Historical Fisheries Information From ADDITIONAL HISTORICAL FISHERIES INFORMATION FROM THE MUSKWA-KECHIKA MANAGEMENT AREA Prepared By: Alicia D. Woods Woods Environmental Consulting SS#2 Site 13 Comp 17 Fort St. John, BC V1J 4M7 For: Fisheries Branch Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection Rm. 400 10003-110th Avenue Fort St. John, BC V1J 6M7 December 2001 Muskwa-Kechika Historical Fisheries Research Project 2001 SUMMARY The primary purpose of this research project was to compile and preserve historical fisheries information from within the Muskwa-Kechika Management Area. This is the second year of the project, and this report will outline the information obtained from the 2001 study year. The purpose of the first year of research was to learn more about the stocking and transplanting of fish that occurred historically in the Muskwa-Kechika Management Area. The project soon began to gather a wide variety of historical fisheries information. This year, the goal of the project was try and obtain information that was not collected previously as well as to broaden the aspects of this project by including the historical aboriginal uses of fish in the Muskwa-Kechika Management Area. The Fisheries Section Head, Fort St. John, obtained funding for this project through an application to the Muskwa-Kechika Trust Fund. ACKNOWLEDMENTS I would like to thank Nick Baccante, Jeff Burrows, Paul Mitchell-Banks, and Rachelle Woods for their assistance with this project. I also would like to express my appreciation and thanks to all the residents, Guide Outfitters and First Nations of northeastern British Columbia for allowing me to come into their homes and sharing with me a part of their past. WOODS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING i Muskwa-Kechika Historical Fisheries Research Project 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………… 1 2.0 METHODS ………………………………………………………………………... 1 2.1 Description of Study Area ………………………………………………… 1 2.2 Methods of Study ………………………………………………………….. 3 3.0 PART I: ABORIGINAL USE OF FISH IN THE MUSKWA-KECHIKA MANAGEMENT AREA …………………………………………………………. 4 3.1 Introduction ………………………………………………………………... 4 3.2 Kwadacha First Nations …………………………………………………… 5 3.3 Fort Nelson First Nations ………………………………………………….. 7 3.4 Halfway River First Nations ………………………………………………. 9 3.5 McDonald Family …………………………………………………………. 11 3.6 Summary ...………………………………………………………………… 13 4.0 PART II: HISTORICAL FISHERIES INFORMATION FROM THE MUSKWA-KECHIKA MANAGEMENT AREA ………………………………… 14 4.1 LOWER HALFWAY RIVER WATERSHED……………………………. 14 4.1.1 Graham River …………………………………………………. 14 4.2 UPPER HALFWAY RIVER WATERSHED …………………………….. 15 4.2.1 Halfway River …………………………………………………. 15 4.2.2 Cypress Creek …………………………………………………. 18 4.2.3 Chowade River ………………………………………………… 18 4.2.4 Blue Grave Creek ……………………………………………… 19 4.2.5 Two Bit Creek …………………………………………………. 19 4.2.6 Robb Lake …………………………………………………….. 20 4.3 UPPER SIKANNI CHIEF RIVER WATERSHED ………………………. 20 4.3.1 Cranswick Lake ………………………………………………. 20 4.3.2 Trimble Lake …………………………………………………. 21 4.3.3 Sikanni Chief River…………………………………………… 21 4.3.4 Pocketknife Creek ……………………………………………. 22 4.4 UPPER PROPHET RIVER WATERSHED ……………………………… 22 4.4.1 Fairy Lake …………………………………………………….. 22 4.4.2 Redfern Lake …………………………………………………. 23 4.4.3 Prophet River …………………………………………………. 23 4.4.4 Besa River …………………………………………………….. 23 4.4.5 Nevis Creek …………………………………………………… 24 4.5 MIDDLE MUSKWA RIVER WATERSHED ……………………………. 24 4.5.1 Tuchodi Lakes ………………………………………………… 24 4.5.2 Tetsa Lake …………………………………………………….. 25 4.5.3 Tetsa River …………………………………………………….. 25 4.5.4 Chischa River and Chlotapecta Creek ………………………… 26 4.6 TOAD RIVER WATERSHED ……………………………………………. 26 4.6.1 Wokkpash Lake ……………………………………………….. 26 4.6.2 Moose Lake ……………………………………………………. 27 4.6.3 Blue Lake ……………………………………………………… 29 4.6.4 Yedhe Lakes …………………………………………………… 29 WOODS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING ii Muskwa-Kechika Historical Fisheries Research Project 2001 4.6.5 Racing River …………………………………………………… 29 4.6.6 Toad River …………………………………………………….. 31 4.6.7 MacDonald Creek ……………………………………………… 33 4.7 LIARD RIVER WATERSHED …………………………………………… 34 4.7.1 Sorenson’s Pond ……………………………………………….. 34 4.7.2 Long Mountain Lake ………………………………………….. 34 4.7.3 Fishing Lakes …………………………………………………. 34 4.7.4 Windfall Lake ………………………………………………… 35 4.7.5 Forcier Lake …………………………………………………… 35 4.7.6 Skeezer Lake ………………………………………………….. 36 4.7.7 Rabbit River …………………………………………………… 37 4.7.8 Liard River …………………………………………………….. 37 4.7.9 Smith River …………………………………………………… 39 4.8 UPPER KECHIKA RIVER WATERSHED ……………………………… 41 4.8.1 Denetiah Lake …………………………………………………. 41 4.9 TURNAGAIN RIVER WATERSHED ……..…………………………….. 41 4.9.1 Blue Sheep Lake ……………………………………………….. 41 4.10 MACKENZIE ADDITION – NOVEMBER 2000 …………………….. 41 4.10.1 South Gataga Lakes ……………………………………………. 41 4.10.2 Pike Lakes and Bevin Lake ……………………………………. 41 4.10.3 Spinel Lake and Ridgeway Lake ……………………………… 42 4.10.4 Weissener Lake ………………………………………………... 42 5.0 DISCUSSION ……………………………………………………………………… 43 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ………………………………………………………….. 48 7.0 LITERATURE CITED …………………………………………………………….. 49 8.0 PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS ………………………………………………. 50 WOODS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING iii Muskwa-Kechika Historical Fisheries Research Project 2001 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Map of the Muskwa-Kechika Management Area, 2001 ………………. 2 Figure 2. Schematic of the fish trap used by the Fort Nelson First Nations ……... 8 Figure 3. Map illustrating fish stocking and transplanting activities in the Muskwa-Kechika Management Area ………………… 47 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Fish species present in the Muskwa-Kechika Management Area ……... 3 Table 2. First Nation Councils with traditional lands overlapping the Muskwa-Kechika Management Area …………………………………. 4 Table 3. Comparison of fish populations and angling observations from 1964 to 1996 for the Graham and Halfway Rivers …………….... 15 Table 4. Historical Stocking and Transplanting Activities Occurring in the Muskwa-Kechika Management Area ……………………………… 44 LIST OF PLATES Plate 1. North end of Moose Lake, July 2001. (Picture Source: Alicia Woods) …………………………………….…. 27 Plate 2. The shallow, marshy channels of Moose Lake, July 2001. (Picture Source: Alicia Woods) ……………………………………….. 28 Plate 3. The south bay of Moose Lake. Picture taken from Angus McDonald’s cabin. (Picture Source: Alicia Woods) …………………………… ….. 30 Plate 4. View of Moose Lake from Angus McDonald’s cabin, July 2001. (Picture Source: Alicia Woods) ……………………………………….. 30 Plate 5. Toad River as it outlets from Moose Lake, July 2001. (Picture Source: Alicia Woods) ……………………………………….. 32 Plate 6. Chester L. Russell proudly displays his catch of Arctic grayling from the Toad River, July 1942. (Picture Source: Russell, 1999) ……………………………………….. 33 Plate 7. The prized bull trout caught from the base of the Smith River Falls in 1942. (Picture Source: Russell, 1942) ………….. 39 Plate 8. Fishing on the Smith River in 1942. (Picture Source: Russell, 1999) ………………………………………… 40 Plate 9. The Smith River Falls as seen in 1942. (Picture Source: Russell, 1999) ………………………………………… 40 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix I. Standard Set of Questions Used During Interviews ………………….. 52 Appendix II. Set of Questions Used During First Nations Interviews ……………… 53 Appendix III. People Unable To Be Contacted For Interviews ……………………… 53 WOODS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING iv Muskwa-Kechika Historical Fisheries Research Project 2001 Appendix IV. List of Contacts According to the Watershed For Which They Provided Information …………………………………… 54 Appendix V. Interview Summaries …………………………………………………. 58 2.1 Gary Moore, May 30, 2001 …………………………………………… 58 2.2 John Bedell, June 5, 2001 …………………………………………….. 60 2.3 Al Parker, June 6, 2001 ……………………………………………….. 66 2.4 Paul Gillis, June 19, 2001 …………………………………………….. 68 2.5 Matt Westergaard, June 21, 2001 ……………………………………… 72 2.6 Blaine Southwick, June 22, 2001 ……………………………………… 75 2.7 Dennis & Debbie Beattie, June 28, 2001 ……………………………… 76 2.8 Charlie Boya, July 4, 2001 ……………………………………………. 77 2.9 Martin & Sharon Lamereux, July 18, 2001 …………………………… 80 2.10 Ron Mearow, July 14, 2001 …………………………………………… 82 2.11 George McDonald, July 14, 2001 …………………………………….. 83 2.12 Cliff Andrews, July 15, 2001 …………………………………………. 85 2.13 George Behn, July 16, 2001 …………………………………………... 88 2.14 Red Sorenson, July 19, 2001 ………………………………………….. 90 2.15 Jasper Wolkley & Bobby Jackson, July 23, 2001 …………………….. 94 2.16 Arnold Churchill, August 9, 2001 …………………………………….. 97 WOODS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING v Muskwa-Kechika Historical Fisheries Research Project 2001 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Muskwa-Kechika Management Area has expanded, and with this expansion, more knowledge of the area is constantly being demanded. The management area now encompasses a large portion of northern British Columbia, and more attention is being drawn to the many resources within the management area. In a case such as the Muskwa-Kechika Management Area (MKMA), special planning and regulations are used to ensure the preservation of the land in conjunction with the extraction of natural resources. The purpose of this project is to discover, preserve and provide historical fisheries information in order to increase the base of fisheries information from the Muskwa-Kechika Management Area. This project was initiated in the spring of 2000, and this document is a continuation to provide a more complete information database. This year’s report includes the aboriginal use of fisheries in the Muskwa-Kechika Management Area as well as additional general fisheries information. Topics covered in the report include the introductions and transplanting of fish, how
Recommended publications
  • 20. Aboriginal Rights and Interests Effects
    20. ASSESSMENT OF ABORIGINAL AND TREATY RIGHTS AND RELATED INTERESTS 20.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter assesses potential adverse effects on Aboriginal and Treaty rights and related interests which may arise from the Project during construction, operations, decommissioning/reclamation, and post-closure. Underground mining activities have the potential to adversely affect Aboriginal and Treaty rights by interfering with Aboriginal groups’ ability to engage in practices, customs, and traditions that are integral to their distinctive cultures, and/or by interfering with the exercise of rights expressly recognized in a treaty. Interference with Aboriginal and Treaty rights is generally indirect, resulting from changes to environmental conditions that are necessary for the continued exercise of Aboriginal and Treaty rights. The assessment is based on information derived from the Proponent’s engagement with potentially- affected Aboriginal groups, environmental assessments carried out elsewhere in the Application/EIS, and the review of secondary data. Wherever possible, the assessment addresses potential effects on Aboriginal and treaty rights and related interests as understood from the perspective of the Aboriginal groups in question. Baseline reports informing this assessment are appended to the Application/EIS and include: Ethnographic Overview and Traditional Knowledge and Use Desk-Based Research Report (Appendix 17-A) and Saulteau First Nations Knowledge and Use Study for HD Mining Murray River Coal Project (Appendix 17-B). 20.2 REGULATORY AND POLICY FRAMEWORK The Crown has a legal duty to consult with and, where appropriate, accommodate Aboriginal interests when it contemplates a conduct that might adversely impact the potential or established Aboriginal or Treaty right. The Crown delegated procedural aspects of this duty, with respect to the Project, to the Proponent through the Section 11 Order and EIS Guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • British Columbia Ministry of Natural Resource Operations Regional
    T a t s h e n s h in i R i v e r K r e Tutshi Lake l e s v a i ys R ll d iv R r R la e r e k i v G iv e e Swift R L iver Petitot River s r R B a Petitot R l t e Gladys Lake iver if av B A e ic Hall Lake w r h Tagish Lake S R e Teslin Lake w R iv Ri Cro iv e ve i er k e r r w ft Riv e r P S et r re Maxhamish Lake it e o C t Surprise Lake iv er Riv s R R ia u ek iv s her er g re e nc iv n C r y Ra R r illy Peti d A e tot R a e e i l l u k v D v t l c i S e G it B a a r J l R h L d e B G o r h a n ree t r n i a ve it C k y Liard River er a i n k ling iv h R in n m R i R C O l g l iv 'Don e s S e a n K r e r Riv Ts e Atlin Lake er e r k S R e h iver v e nts R i e d k A R e R a i r i n l e s v er V K a h i wig i iv e R C oko a ree R Sl R n k i R i k T M iv a cDame Cre a v e e N k u C ek p r r e y i G o d lu e a ndeb Cr t R ery t T R o i e n ve T s i r r li v w er o e o n od Riv iv u er Gu R r R nda a se R h t i De o R v a e Tuya Lake o Sa Kotcho Lake r i h b I r R v t n e e a b i k v v r n l i i it e e n R R r h R Nahl r in e R iv e l er i iv e R iv v e i r i r T ve i R N r v M ro R u e r t D e e R ud s u i r K e v i r t e e d a l o s r iv le g F o R d o e r K r n a n ive in o e D R d Cr k o v t e u d e e r i r E C n Fort Nelson t e R a ch iv e R o u y v r D o R i e T a i D R v e ek H e a re e k o C n r Cry Lake T l ykl i urn l K h aga iver R la in R t iv u e Nets on S r Cre e S Dease Lake k h e B K Elleh Cre s e utc ek la a h tt o y y Cr R e T C ek r o nta iv Ri e s Creek Fo s r v iv e e lla e r a v e nzi r e R d R r a e e T v g h i i o R
    [Show full text]
  • BC OGC Water Use in Oil and Gas Activities 2012
    Water Use in Oil and Gas Activities Quarterly Updates on Short-Term Water Approvals and Use Q2 (April-June 2012) / Q3 (July-September 2012) About Us More Information BC Oil and Gas Commission Contact www.bcogc.ca Table of Contents The BC Oil and Gas Commission (Commission) is The short-term water approvals and usage data is the single-window regulatory agency with responsibilities updated quarterly with new information and statistics. A About the BC Oil and Gas Commission 2 for regulating oil and gas activities in British Columbia, current copy is available on the Commission website at More Information and Contact 2 including exploration, development, pipeline www.bcogc.ca, along with: transportation and reclamation. • Oil and Gas Activities Act and Water Act Update on Short-Term Water Approvals and Use 3 • Short-term Use of Water Application Manual The Commission’s core services include reviewing and • Data files of all Active Section 8 Approvals Water Used in Oil and Gas Activities 3 assessing applications for industry activity, consulting • 2011 Annual Water Report and Quarterly with First Nations, cooperating with partner agencies, Updates (Jan-Mar, Apr-Jun, Jul-Sep) Total Approvals and Reported Use 4 and ensuring industry complies with provincial legislation • 2012 Quarterly Updates Table 2 – Q2 Section 8 Data 6 and all regulatory requirements. The public interest • Northeast Water Tool is protected by ensuring public safety, respecting Table 3 – Q3 Section 8 Data 10 those affected by oil and gas activities, conserving the environment, and ensuring equitable participation in For specific questions or enquiries regarding this data, Appendix A – Water Source Well Production 14 production.
    [Show full text]
  • Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities
    Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities Alaska Aialik Bay Alaska Highway Alcan Highway Anchorage Arctic Auk Lake Cape Prince of Wales Castle Rock Chilkoot Pass Columbia Glacier Cook Inlet Copper River Cordova Curry Dawson Denali Denali National Park Eagle Fairbanks Five Finger Rapids Gastineau Channel Glacier Bay Glenn Highway Haines Harding Gateway Homer Hoonah Hurricane Gulch Inland Passage Inside Passage Isabel Pass Juneau Katmai National Monument Kenai Kenai Lake Kenai Peninsula Kenai River Kechikan Ketchikan Creek Kodiak Kodiak Island Kotzebue Lake Atlin Lake Bennett Latouche Lynn Canal Matanuska Valley McKinley Park Mendenhall Glacier Miles Canyon Montgomery Mount Blackburn Mount Dewey Mount McKinley Mount McKinley Park Mount O’Neal Mount Sanford Muir Glacier Nome North Slope Noyes Island Nushagak Opelika Palmer Petersburg Pribilof Island Resurrection Bay Richardson Highway Rocy Point St. Michael Sawtooth Mountain Sentinal Island Seward Sitka Sitka National Park Skagway Southeastern Alaska Stikine Rier Sulzer Summit Swift Current Taku Glacier Taku Inlet Taku Lodge Tanana Tanana River Tok Tunnel Mountain Valdez White Pass Whitehorse Wrangell Wrangell Narrow Yukon Yukon River General Views—no specific location Alabama Albany Albertville Alexander City Andalusia Anniston Ashford Athens Attalla Auburn Batesville Bessemer Birmingham Blue Lake Blue Springs Boaz Bobler’s Creek Boyles Brewton Bridgeport Camden Camp Hill Camp Rucker Carbon Hill Castleberry Centerville Centre Chapman Chattahoochee Valley Cheaha State Park Choctaw County
    [Show full text]
  • PROVINCI L Li L MUSEUM
    PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA REPORT OF THE PROVINCI_l_Li_L MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY • FOR THE YEAR 1930 PRINTED BY AUTHORITY OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY. VICTORIA, B.C. : Printed by CHARLES F. BANFIELD, Printer to tbe King's Most Excellent Majesty. 1931. \ . To His Honour JAMES ALEXANDER MACDONALD, Administrator of the Province of British Columbia. MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR: The undersigned respectfully submits herewith the Annual Report of the Provincial Museum of Natural History for the year 1930. SAMUEL LYNESS HOWE, Pt·ovincial Secretary. Pt·ovincial Secretary's Office, Victoria, B.O., March 26th, 1931. PROVINCIAl. MUSEUM OF NATURAl. HISTORY, VICTORIA, B.C., March 26th, 1931. The Ho1Wm·able S. L. Ho11ie, ProvinciaZ Secreta11}, Victo1·ia, B.a. Sm,-I have the honour, as Director of the Provincial Museum of Natural History, to lay before you the Report for the year ended December 31st, 1930, covering the activities of the Museum. I have the honour to be, Sir, Your obedient servant, FRANCIS KERMODE, Director. TABLE OF CONTENTS . PAGE. Staff of the Museum ............................. ------------ --- ------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- -------------- 6 Object.. .......... ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------- -- ---------- -- ------------------------ ----- ------------------- 7 Admission .... ------------------------------------------------------ ------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Order of the Executive Director May 14, 2020
    PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Park Act Order of the Executive Director TO: Public Notice DATE: May 14, 2020 WHEREAS: A. This Order applies to all Crown land established or continued as a park, conservancy, recreation area, or ecological reserve under the Park Act, the Protected Areas of British Columbia Act or protected areas established under provisions of the Environment and Land Use Act. B. This Order is made in the public interest in response to the COVID-19 pandemic for the purposes of the protection of human health and safety. C. This Order is in regard to all public access, facilities or uses that exist in any of the lands mentioned in Section A above, and includes but is not limited to: campgrounds, day-use areas, trails, playgrounds, shelters, visitor centers, cabins, chalets, lodges, resort areas, group campsites, and all other facilities or lands owned or operated by or on behalf of BC Parks. D. This Order is in replacement of the Order of the Executive Director dated April 8, 2020 and is subject to further amendment, revocation or repeal as necessary to respond to changing circumstances around the COVID-19 pandemic. Exemptions that were issued in relation to the previous Order, and were still in effect, are carried forward and applied to this Order in the same manner and effect. Province of British Columbia Park Act Order of the Executive Director 1 E. The protection of park visitor health, the health of all BC Parks staff, Park Operators, contractors and permittees is the primary consideration in the making of this Order.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish 2002 Tec Doc Draft3
    BRITISH COLUMBIA MINISTRY OF WATER, LAND AND AIR PROTECTION - 2002 Environmental Indicator: Fish in British Columbia Primary Indicator: Conservation status of Steelhead Trout stocks rated as healthy, of conservation concern, and of extreme conservation concern. Selection of the Indicator: The conservation status of Steelhead Trout stocks is a state or condition indicator. It provides a direct measure of the condition of British Columbia’s Steelhead stocks. Steelhead Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) are highly valued by recreational anglers and play a locally important role in First Nations ceremonial, social and food fisheries. Because Steelhead Trout use both freshwater and marine ecosystems at different periods in their life cycle, it is difficult to separate effects of freshwater and marine habitat quality and freshwater and marine harvest mortality. Recent delcines, however, in southern stocks have been attributed to environmental change, rather than over-fishing because many of these stocks are not significantly harvested by sport or commercial fisheries. With respect to conseration risk, if a stock is over fished, it is designated as being of ‘conservation concern’. The term ‘extreme conservation concern’ is applied to stock if there is a probablity that the stock could be extirpated. Data and Sources: Table 1. Conservation Ratings of Steelhead Stock in British Columbia, 2000 Steelhead Stock Extreme Conservation Conservation Healthy Total (Conservation Unit Name) Concern Concern Bella Coola–Rivers Inlet 1 32 33 Boundary Bay 4 4 Burrard
    [Show full text]
  • Dionisio Point Excavations
    1HE• Publication of the Archaeological Society of Vol. 31 , No. I - 1999 Dionisio Point Excavations ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF &MIDDEN BRITISH COLUMBIA Published four times a year by the Archaeological Society of British Columbia Dedicated to the protection of archaeological resot:Jrces and the spread of archaeological knowledge. Editorial Committee Editor: Heather Myles (274-4294) President Field Editor: Richard Brolly (689-1678) Helmi Braches (462-8942) arcas@istar. ca [email protected] News Editor: Heather Myles Publications Editor: Robbin Chatan (215-1746) Membership [email protected] Sean Nugent (685-9592) Assistant Editors: Erin Strutt [email protected] erins@intergate. be.ca Fred Braches Annual membership includes I year's subscription to [email protected] The Midden and the ASBC newsletter, SocNotes. Production & Subscriptions: Fred Braches ( 462-8942) Membership Fees I SuBSCRIPTION is included with ASBC membership. Individual: $25 Family: $30 . Seniors/Students: $I 8 Non-members: $14.50 per year ($1 7.00 USA and overseas), Send cheque or money order payable to the ASBC to: payable in Canadian funds to the ASBC. Remit to: ASBC Memberships Midden Subscriptions, ASBC P.O. Box 520, Bentall Station P.O. Box 520, Bentall Station Vancouver BC V6C 2N3 Vancouver BC V6C 2N3 SuBMISSIONs: We welcome contributions on subjects germane ASBC on Internet to BC archaeology. Guidelines are available on request. Sub­ http://home.istar.ca/-glenchan/asbc/asbc.shtml missions and exchange publications should be directed to the appropriate editor at the ASBC address. Affiliated Chapters Copyright Nanaimo Contact: Rachael Sydenham Internet: http://www.geocities.com/rainforest/5433 Contents of The Midden are copyrighted by the ASBC.
    [Show full text]
  • Muskwa-Kechika Case Study (Northeastern British Columbia and Adjacent Areas of the Yukon and Northwest Territories)
    Conserving Canada’s Natural Capital: the Boreal Forest Muskwa-Kechika Case Study (Northeastern British Columbia and adjacent areas of the Yukon and Northwest Territories) Prepared for: National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy Ottawa, Ontario By: R. McManus Consulting Ltd. and Salmo Consulting Inc. Calgary, Alberta July 2004 NRTEE Muskwa-Kechika Case Study TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1 The Boreal Forest Program................................................................................. 1 1.2 Case Studies........................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Muskwa-Kechika Case Study............................................................................. 2 1.3.1 Methods....................................................................................................... 4 1.3.1.1 Literature Review.................................................................................... 4 1.3.1.2 Interviews................................................................................................ 4 1.3.1.3 Multi-stakeholder Workshop .................................................................. 5 2. Legislation and Policy Framework..................................................................... 6 2.1 Case Study Region.............................................................................................. 7 2.1.1 Major Players.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis arxi dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing In this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Bell & Howell Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 UMI NOTE TO USERS This reproduction is the best copy available. UMI Stratigraphy, Conodont Taxonomy and Biostratigraphy of Upper Cambrian to Lower Silurian Platform to Basin Facies, Northern British Columbia by Leanne Pyle B. Sc., University of Saskatchewan, 1994 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the School of Earth and Ocean Sciences We accept this dissertation as conforming to the required standard , Supervisor (School of Earth and Ocean Sciences) Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 396 BC Hydro Independent Power Producers (IPP) Supply Map (Bates No
    DOCKETED Docket 16-RPS-02 Number: Project Title: Appeal by Los Angeles Department of Water & Power re Renewables Portfolio Standard Certification Eligibility TN #: 213752 Document Title: 396 BC Hydro Independent Power Producers (IPP) Supply Map (Bates No. LA002914) Description: Map Filer: Pjoy Chua Organization: LADWP Submitter Role: Applicant Submission 9/21/2016 4:05:12 PM Date: Docketed Date: 9/21/2016 i n i h s n r e e v h i s R t Kelsall a L T TAGISH Kelsall G la R LAKE d YUKON y Alsek s TESL IN Taku Gladys S wi Arm Lake ft R Hall L S urprise R L LAKE Fantail L eria ATLIN h N W T c n a R Atlin R Crow R LAATL ittle KE L R R Maxhamish L Petitot R ladys R G River O 88 J ' enn D lue o l B Thinahtea nne ings L LIARDmith River S Grayling River R Sahd River T e Tsea Sloko R s oanah A l R i sh Cr Red Thetlaandoa Sloko n L R y ina k R a C N Rabbit RIVER o se Cr t lundeber t R G wood R o ea apid n D T Cr Cr uya w FORT Kwokullie o I L o Dead L d R n R R k R l i n NELS h ile N a l River M i n Meek Taku Kotcho R iver L ON Saht Lake Net D R udi R our M uncho iver F R R son dontu aneh Lake River ahine Kechika utl agle S E Cry L Kledo S R Kotcho Dall Cr he Dease T urn Toad Cr FORT NELSON IPP SUPPLY again slay T R River uya R acing R Lake iver WSP 1L357 RIVE KLC Cr R FNG Kyklo Hay K utcho FNC R DLK B wa eat R Denetiah R R TO 86 R 1L359 ty L G ataga ALBERTA Musk Elleh LEGEND illa Cr R Cr anz Cr Cheves T R R iver R Prophet an R lt R EXISTING ah R Fontas River T IPPs with BC Hydro contracts (Total Number 131) ALBERTA O/HEAD OTHER R CABLE ucho rog T F w UTILITIES ide RI r o K 500 kV No.
    [Show full text]
  • Bc12 Report.Pdf
    Soils of the Fort Nelson Area of British Columbia K.W. G. VALENTINE Canada Department of Agriculture, Vancouver, B.C. REPORT No. 12 British Columbia Soi1 Survey Research Branch - Canada Department of Agriculture. 1971 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to acknowledge the help of Mr. L. Farstad, Canada Depart- ment of Agriculture, Vancouver, and Mr. P. N. Sprout, British Columbia Depart- ment of Agriculture, Kelowna, who initiated the project and gave constructive advice during various parts of the field and office work. Mr. D. Hodgson helped with the field work in the summer of 1967. Soi1 analyses were carried out by Mr. S. K. Chan and Miss M. E. Turnbull. Mr. J. M. Wallace, Department of Energy, Mines, and Resources, Water Resources Branch, Vancouver, B.C., provided valuable information on the seasonal flood levels of the Muskwa and Fort Nelson rivers., Mr. R. A. Nemeth, pipeline engineer, Westcoast Transmission CO. Ltd., Van- couver, gave permission for information from his company’s Yoyo pipeline muskeg survey to be used in Fig. 5. Dr. H. Vaartnou, Research Station, Canada Department of Agriculture, Beaverlodge, Alta., identified many of the plant specimens that were collected during the survey. Mr. G. W. Robertson, Agrometeorology Section, Canada Department of Agri- culture, Ottawa, supplied estimates of agroclimatic normals based on the Hopkins regression formulas. Mr. R. Marshall, Agroclimatology, British Columbia Depart- ment of Agriculture, also supplied much climatic data. The soi1 map and Fig. l-5, 11, 13, 15, and 16 were prepared by the Cartogra- phy Section, Soi1 Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa. Messrs.
    [Show full text]