Account of Purley on Thames Gallantry Should Never Be Forgotten

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Account of Purley on Thames Gallantry Should Never Be Forgotten Account of Purley on Thames Gallantry should never be forgotten The Purley Connection While John Chapman was taking Mrs Eileen Goddard from St Mary’s Avenue to the Royal Berks Hospital on a Volunteer Centre trip, she happened to mention that her husband was one of the crew of X6 – one of the three midget submarines sent to try to cripple the Tirpitz in 1943. He had no idea that we had a Purley connection with an event like this and thought a few more people would like to know about it. A second connection emerged in that John had been in contact with Vernon Coles DSM over the war in the Pacific when he was Chairman of West Berkshire Council. Vernon was born in Tilehurst and was a close friend of Edmund Goddard with whom he had served on X-craft. The Tirpitz The Tirpitz was one of the most powerful battleships ever built. Her role was to attack convoys bringing much needed supplies from America to Britain and Russia. At 41000 tons she outgun- Edmund Goddard [M030508] ned any Royal Navy ship and if allowed to roam the Atlantic she would be a terrible danger to our ships, far more of a menace than any submarine. Churchill christened her ‘The Beast’ and put the country’s best minds to work to see how they could counter the menace. She was commissioned in February 1941, the last and most powerful of the Bismark Class and was sent to Trondheim in Norway in January 1942 to prevent an allied invasion of Norway and to attack the Russian convoys. She was responsi- ble for the destruction of the convoy PQ17 with- out firing a single shot – her mere presence was enough to cause the convoy to scatter letting the individual ships to be picked off by U-boats. Two squadrons of bombers were sent out on the 30th Jan to try to sink her but failed to find her. Two The Tirpitz [M070114] more naval squadrons of torpedo bombers tried again in March without success and more attacks by the RAF in April saw 13 aircraft lost with still no success. The solution the navy came up with was the X-craft, midget submarines with a crew of four whose job it was to slip through the defences and lay huge explosive charges alongside the Tirpitz and, hopefully, get away before they detonated. Six craft were built initially and crews started training in great secret at Loch Cairnbawn on the west coast of Scotland. Training was completed in September 1943 and, towed by more conventional submarines, six boats set out on a 1500 mile journey to Norway. Edmund Goddard Edmund Goddard was born in 1921 and attended Woodlands Preparatory School in Deganwy near Llandudno and St Edwards School Oxford. He joined the Royal Navy in 1941 and was sent to HMS Sutlam in Portsmouth to test his suitability as an Engine Room Artificer. He was given five pieces of rough steel which he had to shape before a panel of officers. Although he took a long time over the task he passed as an ERA 5th Class and was sent on a two weeks Ships' Engineering Course. Over the next few months he spent time fir watching on the roof of the Wren's quarters at Portsmouth - not a nice experience with the Germans dropping bombs all around. He went on to HMS Hornet at Gosport to train on marine engines arriving on Christmas Eve 1941 having been on leave at home at Harpendon, expecting to spend Christmas there when his new orders came by telegram. There was no berth for him aboard Hornet so he went ashore to a local pub and met up with four other sailors who offered to speak to their landlady who agreed to take him in and give him Christmas dinner. On Hornet he was employed on maintenance and learned about motor boats. One day he spotted a request on the notice board for volunteers for submarines. He was getting pretty fed up and bored with his job on Hornet so he asked his Chief Petty Officer and was sent off to HMS Dolphin, the submarine base at Gosport. for tests and a medical and was accepted after two days. Here he received further training including as a navy diver. On one occasion he was used to test a new diving suit and was lowered into the water in it. Unfortunately there was deep mud at that point and he sank into it and they had to get a heavy duty crane to pull him out. The X-craft Midget submarines had been pioneered by the Italian Navy The Royal Navy experimented with X1 and X2 but X3 and X4 were the real prototypes. X3 was built at Hamble by Varley Marine and launched 15th March 1942 and X4 by Portsmouth Dockyard. Eventually the Navy were satisfied they had a workable weapons system and ordered six boats from Vickers Armstrongs in Barrow-in- Furness. They were 51 feet 4 in long, 5 ft 9 inches in beam and had a draught of 5 ft 4 inches. They could dive to a depth of 300 feet and travel at 5.5 knots submerged, propelled by a single Gardner diesel or a Keith-Blackman electric motor with a range of about 80 miles. They had a crew of four, originally just a Commander, Pilot and ERA but a diver was added later. They were armed with two 4,400 lb. explosive charges (Amatol) which were strapped to the sides to be dropped with a time fuse set. Training began in great secrecy in September 1942 and in December 1942 and January 1943 the six X5 class were delivered. These were externally similar to X4 but internally very different, having had a wet-dry cabin installed which enabled a frog-man to enter and exit while submerged. Each X-craft was paired with a conventional submarine which acted as its 'mother' and which towed it to the launch point for a mission and then, hopefully, back to base. Operation Source The attack on the Tirpitz was code-named Operation Source and volunteers were called for for 'hazardous duties' Both Edmund Goddard and Vernon Coles volunteered and were designated the ERAs for X6 and X9 respectively. The requirement was that they had to be under 24, single and qualified as a diver as well as being Engine Room Artificers. Edmund was sent to Scotland for training and here met up with Vernon Coles with whom he was to cement a life-long friendship. Each of the X-craft had two crews, one for passage and one for attack, made up of three officers and an artificer. Because of this, many of the naval formalities between officers and ratings were forgotten and very close bonds built, although the ratings and the officers had separate messes while on training. Training took place at Loch Striven at a base near Strone Point on the western shore. This is about twenty miles due west of Glasgow and far from prying eyes. The training was very hard and quite dangerous. One exercise required the men in full diving gear to vent- ure into the sea with a rope tied to their wrist. If they were OK the signal was to give a short tug on the rope and the officer would let out a bit more. If things were X6 docking at Loch Striven [M001862] not OK the signal was four sharp tugs in quick succes- sion. On this one occasion it was Edmund venturing into the depths with a midshipman holding the rope. He mis-interpreted the emergency signal and merely let out more rope until he was left with just the end. By this time Edmund was in a pretty bad way – no air and close to drowning. By the time the mistake was realised and he was hauled back to the beach he was almost gone, his suit had to be cut off and he had to be resuscitated with oxygen.. The midshipman was packed off to HMS King George V in disgrace. Social Life At the base they were isolated from much of the traditional Navy formalities although one or two officers were sticklers for discipline. The men were billetted at a farm house called Glen Striven House and base HQ was at the Rothesay Hotel. There was very little to do in their rare moments of free time and few roads to anywhere. However being sailors they could make their way by motor boat to Rothesay where there was a cinema or cross the loch to where there was a road to Dunoon. Being ratings they were not allowed access to the duty-free alcohol which the officers enjoyed and had to be content with the watered down standard issues of rum. Although the officers occasionally let the men have some of their beer supplies, on one occasion the men decided to go to the pub. They borrowed a whaler and rowed across the loch and then ran 15 miles to the pub, only to find the landlord calling ‘time’ as they arrived. Deprived of their pleasures they ran 15 miles back only to find the whaler stranded by the receding tide and had to manhandle it over the mud to get back to base. On another occasion they went to a pub in Sandbank where the beer was stored in the yard and guarded by a fierce alsation. They came prepared with kippers which the dog wolfed down and while it was pre-occupied they stole a barrel of beer and smuggled it back to base where the contents were soon distributed among the other men.
Recommended publications
  • 1 Introduction
    Notes 1 Introduction 1. Donald Macintyre, Narvik (London: Evans, 1959), p. 15. 2. See Olav Riste, The Neutral Ally: Norway’s Relations with Belligerent Powers in the First World War (London: Allen and Unwin, 1965). 3. Reflections of the C-in-C Navy on the Outbreak of War, 3 September 1939, The Fuehrer Conferences on Naval Affairs, 1939–45 (Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 1990), pp. 37–38. 4. Report of the C-in-C Navy to the Fuehrer, 10 October 1939, in ibid. p. 47. 5. Report of the C-in-C Navy to the Fuehrer, 8 December 1939, Minutes of a Conference with Herr Hauglin and Herr Quisling on 11 December 1939 and Report of the C-in-C Navy, 12 December 1939 in ibid. pp. 63–67. 6. MGFA, Nichols Bohemia, n 172/14, H. W. Schmidt to Admiral Bohemia, 31 January 1955 cited by Francois Kersaudy, Norway, 1940 (London: Arrow, 1990), p. 42. 7. See Andrew Lambert, ‘Seapower 1939–40: Churchill and the Strategic Origins of the Battle of the Atlantic, Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 17, no. 1 (1994), pp. 86–108. 8. For the importance of Swedish iron ore see Thomas Munch-Petersen, The Strategy of Phoney War (Stockholm: Militärhistoriska Förlaget, 1981). 9. Churchill, The Second World War, I, p. 463. 10. See Richard Wiggan, Hunt the Altmark (London: Hale, 1982). 11. TMI, Tome XV, Déposition de l’amiral Raeder, 17 May 1946 cited by Kersaudy, p. 44. 12. Kersaudy, p. 81. 13. Johannes Andenæs, Olav Riste and Magne Skodvin, Norway and the Second World War (Oslo: Aschehoug, 1966), p.
    [Show full text]
  • Lieutenant Basil Charles Godfrey Place VC, DSC, RN Honoured With
    Lieutenant Basil Charles Godfrey Place Lieutenant Basil Charles Godfrey Place VC, DSC, VC, DSC, RN Honoured with Blue Plaque RN Naval career & citation for the award of the at the Fleet Air Arm Museum, Yeovilton, VC. Somerset. This was followed by the unveiling of the plaque by the President of the Submariners Association and Mr Charles Place (son). Lieutenant Basil Charles Godfrey Place VC, DSC, RN Blue Commemorative Plaque mounted at the Fleet Air Arm Museum Charles Place meets Her Majesty’s Lord Lieutenant of Somerset, Yeovilton. Mrs Annie Maw and Rear Admiral Brian Perowne CB, DL. As part of the Submariners Association initiative Basil Charles Godfrey Place was born in Little the eighth Blue Plaque commemorating a WWII Malvern in Worcestershire on 19th July 1921. He Submariner and VC holder was placed at the Fleet was the son of Godfrey Place, DSO, MC. He Air Arm Museum, Yeovilton, Somerset on joined the Royal Navy at the age of fourteen and Saturday 10th March 2018. spent the first year of the war as a Midshipman in the Cruiser HMS Newcastle before volunteering Approximately 50 guests, which included the for submarines. He was appointed to the 1st Lord Lieutenant of Somerset Mrs. Annie Maw, Submarine Flotilla based at HMS St. Angelo, accompanied by Rear Admiral Brian Perowne Malta ‘for Submarines’ on 11th August 1941. CB, DL, the High Sheriff of Somerset, Mr. Three weeks late on 1st September 1941 Place was Richard Hickmett Esq; the Deputy Mayor & appointed as ‘Liaison Officer’ to the Polish Mayoress of Yeovil, Councillor David & Mrs Submarine Sokol.
    [Show full text]
  • Ian Herrington November 2002
    DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY, LEICESTER THE SPECIAL OPERATIONS EXECUTIVE IN NORWAY 1940-1945: POLICY AND OPERATIONS IN THE STRATEGIC AND POLITICAL CONTEXT A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF HUMANITIES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY SCHOOL OF HISTORICAL AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES BY IAN HERRINGTON June 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract.……………………………………………………………………..i Acknowledgements.………...……………………………………………….ii Abbreviations.……..………………………………………………………. iii Maps………..…………………………………………………………..viii-xii CHAPTERS Introduction……..… ………………………………………………….1 1. The Formation of SOE and its Scandinavian Section: A New Strategic Tool and a Nordic Opportunity …………………………………….. .26 2. SOE’s Policy in Norway 1940-1945: The Combination of Short and Long-Term Aims …………………………………….……………... 55 3. SOE and the Norwegian Government and its Military Authorities 1940-1945: Control through Collaboration………….………….……84 4. SOE and the Military Resistance in Norway 1940-1945: Direction, Separation and finally Partnership…………………………………..116 5. SOE and the other New Organisations Operating in Norway 1940- 1945: A Military Alliance..………………………………………….146 6. SOE and the Regular Armed Forces Operating in Norway 1940-1945: an Unexpected Partnership…………………………………….……185 7. SOE Operations in Norway 1940-1944: The Combination of Sabotage and the Organisation of a Clandestine Army ……………………….221 8. SOE and the Liberation of Norway 1944-1945: Operations in the Shadow of Overlord....……………………………………………..257 Conclusion…………………………………………………………..289 APPENDICES Appendix A: List
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Association of Australia
    Welcome to the Naval Association of Australia Queensland Section INC Monthly Ceremony. Jack’s Memorial Southbank At 11:00 on 26th November 2020 Through the Monthly Ceremony the association wishes to highlight the service of members of Royal Australia Navy. This month in conjunction with the Submariners Association of Australia we commemorate Sub Lieutenant Kenneth Briggs RANVR DSC. Ken as a crew member of the Submarine XE4 at 12:29 on 31 July 1945 while underwater departed the Submarine and with 10 minutes was required to located and cut the Japanese Communication Cables between Saigon-Singapore and just to prove the point he returned to the Sub with a short length of the cable. Despite enormous pressure, limited time and primitive equipment, the sub lieutenant and his accomplice successfully severed a Japanese underwater communication cable linking Singapore and Saigon. It took the X-craft three days to return to its mother ship HMS Bonaventure, which was waiting in Brunei Bay. The cable had restricted the Allies’ ability to overhear and intercept radio messages. As part of Operation Sabre, midget submarines cut cable in a number of different locations. For his efforts Ken was awarded the Distinguished Service Cross These operations, carried out in July 1945, were intended to cut the undersea telephone cables connecting Singapore, Saigon, Hong Kong and Tokyo. The intention was to oblige the Japanese to use radio and render themselves open to message interception. Operation Sabre was directed at the Hong Kong to Saigon telephone cable, and carried out by XE4, which was towed to within 40 miles (64 km) of the Mekong Delta by the submarine HMS Spearhead, where she looked for the two telephone cables by using a towed grapnel.
    [Show full text]
  • Tirpitzeagle
    TIRPITZ Eagle Staff Ride 1 Contents Introduction 2 Tirpitz Eagle - Staff Ride Phase Briefing 4 The German Battleship Tirpitz 6 Schlachtschiff Tirpitz 8 The Strategic Situation 10 Attacks on the Tirpitz 11 The Saint-Nazaire Raid 12 The Halifax at the RAF Museum Hendon 13 Royal Navy Missions 14 Aircraft Carrier Attacks 17 The RAF Returns to the Fray 20 Operation PARAVANE 22 Operation OBVIATE 24 Operation CATECHISM 25 Aftermath 27 Tromsø Cemetery 32 Further Reading 34 Front cover image: Tirpitz firing her main armament. Photo Courtesy: Michael W. Pocock. 1 Introduction Welcome to Tirpitz Eagle 2019. We will Staff Ride Stand Discussion study and commemorate the German Allied forces had to display innovation battleship Tirpitz at the very site where and agility, with a great deal of resilience, she met her end seventy-five years ago. in their attempts to sink the Tirpitz. This action was one of several during Which of these factors have you identified World War Two that saw the demise of from the campaign to sink the ship? such capital ships because of Air Power. Have you been involved with any operations that required similar innovation The day will begin with a journey by ship and fortitude? How do you think that the from Tromsø harbour to where the Tirpitz Bomber Command aircrew overcame their was berthed on 12 November 1944. operational and occupational stress As a result of Operation CATECHISM during their missions to sink Tirpitz? the Tirpitz capsized at 0952 local time. What tools should be available nowadays We will commemorate the loss of the to help cope with stress? ship at this time, as indeed the Norwegians do every year.
    [Show full text]
  • Bravereport Issue 29 Submarines
    Issue 29 Page !1 Brave Report The submarine war ! Leading Seaman James Magennis and Lieutenant Ian Fraser outside Buckingham Palace having been invested with the Victoria Cross by King George VI at Buckingham Palace on the 11th December 1945 Northern Ireland - Service in the Royal Navy - In Remembrance Issue 29 Page !2 The Northern Ireland contribution to HM submarines in World War II is most remarkable. It includes bravery to the utmost - a Victoria Cross awarded to James Magennis, the tactical experience and analysis of submarine warfare of Arthur Hezlett, the youngest admiral appointed, as well as at least 16 men who died in service in HM submarines during the war. The submarine war In World War 2, as they did in World War 1, submarines were widely used by both sides as the ultimate weapon of naval blockade, sinking large numbers of both merchant ships and warships, resulting in either paralyzing the enemy's military industry and war effort by causing severe shortages of war materials and products and preventing maritime troop transfers, or forcing the enemy to dedicate enormous resources to anti submarine warfare in order to prevent that from happening, resources which could otherwise be used in the enemy's main war effort. The submarine is the classic weapon of the war of attrition, where victory is achieved by the side which inflicts significantly more losses in men and material to the enemy than it suffers, and monthly ship tonnage loss counts reflect success or failure better than battle maps. The submarine's ability to attack almost anywhere and anytime, in total surprise and with devastating results, makes it a highly efficient weapon, in which a small crew of about 40 to 80 sailors can do more damage than 1000 sailors in a battleship, and for a fraction of the cost, and a much larger anti-submarine force is required in order to efficiently fight the submarine.
    [Show full text]
  • Guns Blazing! Newsletter of the Naval Wargames Society No
    All Guns Blazing! Newsletter of the Naval Wargames Society No. 170 – May 2008 Editorial April saw the NWS earn a well-deserved feather in its cap. The “Attack at Source” participation game, based on the attack of the X-Craft against the Tirpitz in 1944, won the award for “Most Innovative Game” at the prestigious “Salute” wargames show in London (see the battle report in the following pages). The lion’s share of the award goes to Simon Stokes who put in (as ever) an amazing amount of work in developing the game. Simon is an example and an inspiration to us all. With luck we will be seeing the rules used in the game appearing in a future issue of Battlefleet. It is with great sadness that I have to report the death of David K Brown, RCNC during April. David will be familiar to many of you as the author of a number of excellent books on naval architecture and RN warship design. He was also a good friend to several members of the Society, including myself. Yours aye, DM [email protected] HMS BELFAST D-DAY WEEK EVENT I received a message from Simon Stokes. It is likely that the NWS will be asked to put on a game during the D Day week on board HMS BELFAST, most likely on Saturday May 31st. The game will probably be the “Attack At Source” participation game which appeared for the first toe at Salute in April. If you would like to help out with the game please contact Simon direct at: [email protected] One of my favourite wartime photos – no prizes for guessing what ship and where ☺ Page 1 of 16 Pages “Attack at Source” Naval Wargames Society Participation Game at Salute 2008 By Simon Stokes Introduction For the past few years we’ve made a point of staging an NWS game at Salute.
    [Show full text]
  • Lieutenant Kenneth Robert Hudspeth, Distinguished Service Cross and 2 Bars, RANVR, WWII
    CALL THE HANDS OCCASIONAL PAPER 46 Issue No. 27 February 2019 Lieutenant Kenneth Robert Hudspeth, Distinguished Service Cross and 2 Bars, RANVR, WWII Lieutenant Kenneth Robert Hudspeth, RANVR was one of many Royal Australian Naval personnel whose service in Royal Navy units during the darkest days of World War 2 has gone largely unnoticed in Australia. This story of the self-reliant and courageous LEUT Hudspeth who completed several hazardous missions in the then SECRET, X-Craft (midget submarine) earned him the Distinguished Service Cross and two Bars. Thanks to a research query about Hudspeth received by the Society, the story of his remarkable war service can be told. This story was researched and compiled by Dennis J. Weatherall JP TM AFAITT(L) LSM an active volunteer of the Society. Dennis is a qualified Australian Military Historian and accredited Member of the International Guild of Battlefield Guides. Early Life Kenneth Hudspeth was born in Echuca, Victoria on the Murray River on 31 March 1918. His Father Robert was born in 1891 in Carlton, and mother Ada (nee Sim) in 1894 in Box Hill, Victoria. There were two other brothers born into the Hudspeth family, Bruce in 1919 and Donald 1921 in Hobart, Tasmania. Robert Senior started work at 14 years of age and studied at night school to become a teacher. He went on to become the first Principal of Hobart Technical College having established the school, recruited and trained staff in the specific trades required. Kenneth Robert Hudspeth, was encouraged by his father to be aware of the bushland, and became a keen bushwalker in Tasmania’s south-west region.
    [Show full text]
  • Extract from Hansard [ASSEMBLY - Thursday, 18 June 2009] P5230d-5231A Mr Colin Barnett
    Extract from Hansard [ASSEMBLY - Thursday, 18 June 2009] p5230d-5231a Mr Colin Barnett MAXWELL HENRY SHEAN — CONDOLENCE Statement by Premier MR C.J. BARNETT (Cottesloe — Premier) [9.12 am]: I take this opportunity to place on the record part of the remarkable life of Max Shean, a proud Western Australian and a true war hero. Maxwell Henry Shean was born in South Perth on 6 July 1918, the son of Henry and Gladys Shean. Growing up primarily in South Perth, Max spent his childhood when not at school exploring the river in homemade craft—a precursor to his lifelong love of the ocean. As an engineering student at the University of Western Australia in 1939, he became concerned about the escalation of conflict in Europe. On 25 June 1940, a newspaper advertisement appeared inviting applications from gentlemen with yachting experience to be commissioned as temporary acting sublieutenants in the Royal Australian Naval Volunteer Reserve and to be trained in antisubmarine duties. Max applied and was accepted on 14 August 1940. Max Shean started with the Navy on 28 October 1940 and, in April 1941, with his training complete and aged 23, he left Australia for active service. He joined convoy escort corvette Bluebell and spent 15 months escorting Liverpool-Gibraltar convoys. During this period, Max oversaw direct combat with German U-boats. In 1942, he responded to an admiralty appeal for volunteers to join special and hazardous service and was appointed to a new flotilla of 30-ton submarines. Max Shean took part in Operation Source as X9’s diver for the attack on the German battleship Tirpitz, in Operation Guidance in command of X24, and in sinking the German ammunition ship the Barenfels.
    [Show full text]