Venezuela's Political Party System on the Eve of National Elections

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Venezuela's Political Party System on the Eve of National Elections No. 44 by Howard Handelman Venezuela's Political Party South America [HH-3-'781 System on the Eve of National Elections On January 23,1978, Venezuelan parties and popular mobilization had a range of activities and to meet President Carlos Andres Perez not existed prior to the 1930s. When demands from competing sectors of opened the doors of Miraflores, the President Betancourt took office in society in a manner that other Latin nation's presidential palace, to the 1958, then, democratic institutions American governments cannot public. Throughout the day, for expressing popular will had afford. While relative affluence is no thousands of housewives, scarcely been established. guarantor of democracy, businessmen, workers, and Venezuela's economic growth has shantytown-dwellers poured In December of this year the nation been supplemented by the through the building's ornate halls. will hold its fifth democratic national development of popular democratic "Today," proclaimed the election since 1958, for the institutions. government's television and press presidency and both houses of advertisements, "Miraflores belongs Congress. Shortly thereafter, Yet, it is well to remember that to the people." The President's President Perez will become the Venezuelan democracy is still open house marked the twentieth fourth consecutive Venezuelan chief young. As the January 23 anniversary of a critical date in executive to serve out his anniversary approached, movie modern Venezuelan history, the constitutional five-year term and theaters in Caracas showed brief abdication of the nation's dictator, peacefully hand over power to his news documentaries on the 1958 General Marcos Perez Jimenez, and successor.2 Moreover, unlike many popular uprising. Television and the birth of contemporary (other developing nations where other news media featured Venezuelan democracy. In the days apparently democratic elections are advertisements contrasting the preceding Perez Jimenez's fall, merely a charade or a competition nation's long history of dictatorship thousands of Caracas citizens had between nonrepresentative elites, to its recent democratic stability. taken to the streets in a political parties in Venezuela are These government-sponsoredads spontaneous uprising against the fairly responsive to popular interests ended with a single message, dictatorship. They were soon joined and demands. On two occasions "Democracy, the only path" by much of the Armed Forces. In (1968 and 19731, presidential ("Democracia, el unico camino"). December 1958, after a brief interim authority had passed from one News programs on the government government, Romulo Betancourt political party to another without television stations (two of Caracas' was elected to a five-year trauma. While military governments four channels) are often followed by presidential term. seized power throughout the the statement "only in a democratic hemisphere and crushed society is such a show possible." Few would have predicted in 1958 long-standing democracies in Chile The government seems to be that Venezuela would emerge in the and Uruguay, Venezuela has thus reassuring both its constituents and coming years as the foremost developed during the past 15 years itself that current political symbol of democracy in Latin from an entrenched military regime institutions are viable. One is ~merica?Until the overthrow of to South America's most stable reminded of a patient taking the first Perez Jimenez, the country had democracy. steps after a long illness. Even when been ruled almost continuously by a the walk is no longer wobbly, a series of military dictators and Undoubtedly the country's task has certain sense of insecurity remains. caudillos (strong men). Indeed, only been eased by its extensive during three years of its history petroleum wealth. Substantial tax As an alternative development (1945-1948) had the nation ever revenues from the recently model to the bureaucratic- enjoyed a popularly elected, civilian nationalized oil industry have authoritarian regimes now prevalent government. Modern political enabled the government to invest in throughout Latin America, Venezuelan democracy has power of regional strongmen and Marxists of either an orthodox or consequences that transcend its centralize power in the national revisionist type; others were more national borders, suggesting that Armed Forces and bureaucracy. inclined to a nationalist reformism liberal democracy has some future modeled after both the Mexican in the region. Its Social Democratic The initiation of extensive petroleum Revolution and the Peruvian Aprista (Accion Democratica) and Social extraction in 1922, however, set movement. Christian (COPED Parties are loosely social and economic forces in linked, through international motion that were to change the face The death of Juan Vicente Gomez in organizations, to parallel parties in of Venezuelan politics. By 1929, the December 1935 permitted Chile, Costa Rica, the Dominican country had become the world's the return of exiled student activists Republic, and Peru. Even before the leading oil exporter and petroleum and a more tolerant, if Carter administration's efforts, revenues helped finance the first unpredictable, government policy Venezuela had taken the lead in stages of industrialization. As toward popular political supporting human rights and peasants moved to the cities in participation. The Venezuelan democratic elections in Latin search of jobs, a country whose Communist Party, the National America. During the past months it population had been over two-thirds Democratic Party (PDN), and the has dramatically exerted pressure, rural in the 1930s became more than Venezuelan Labor Congress (CTV) independently and through the half urban by 1950. To be sure, became important vehicles for mass Organization of American States regressive government policies mobilization. (OAS), to establish democratic often inhibited development. As late governments in the Dominican as 1945, the country still had only In 1941, the PDN was legalized and Republic and in Nicaragua. seven public secondary schools. reorganized into the Acci6n Despite such policies, urbanization Democratica (AD). Led by Romulo This Report examines the origins of and economic expansion combined Betancourt, one of the generation of contemporary Venezuelan to augment the power of two '28, AD was a direct outgrowth of democracy, the nature of groups that began to play an the underground student-mass democratic governments since important role in the nation's politics movement of the 1930s. In 1937, 1958, the major political and for the first time: the urban middle Betancourt's colleagues had socioeconomic problems still facing class and the industrial-petroleum renounced Marxism to form a the nation, and the position of working class. Through the close of multiclass, populist movement. The Venezuela's major political parties the 1930s, neither group had any hallmark of Acci6n Democr6tica as the country entered its current institutional base-unions, political then, and ever since, has been electoral campaign. A subsequent parties, or interest groups-to vigorous and tireless organization. Report, The Making of a Venezuelan express their political demands. Throughout the country, AD President- 1978, will analyze the Eventually, however, their voices organizers went to the universities, mood of the electorate, the parties' had to be heard. factories, urban middle-class selection of presidential candidates, neighborhoods, and the countryside and the campaign through August The first rumbles of discontent to establish a popular base matched 1978. came, as they so often do in Latin by few other parties in Latin America, from the nation's America. Betancourt's marching The Origins of Venezuela's Modern universities. In 1928, demands for order to the party cadre was "not a Political system3 greater political freedom from single district, not a single From its original colonization by the Venezuelan Central University municipality without its party Spanish through the early twentieth students led to mass ~r~anization."~Student century, Venezuela was demonstrations, clashes with the associations, labor unions, peasant socioeconomically underdeveloped. police, and extensive arrests. federations, and other vertical and Its capital city, Caracas, compared Student leaders who escaped horizontal organizations formed the to such major commercial and imprisonment were forced into base of a party machine that has cultural centers as Lima, Bogota, hiding or exile. Spurred by signs of served AD until today. and Mexico City, was a secondary popular support, others began to colonial center. During the organize the middle class, industrial Four years after Acci6n post-independence era of the workers, and peasantry. From DemocrAtica's foundation, party nineteenth century, continued among these student activists (at leaders conspired with junior warfare between local military chiefs home and in exile) came the leaders, military officers to overthrow the inhibited political development. A known as "the generation of '28," government of General Isaias series of caudillo dictators- Antonio who were to shape Venezuelan Medina Angarita. The October 1945 Guzman Blanco (1870-18881, political development for the next 40 coup was later followed by popular Cipriano Castro (1899-19081, and years. Essentially, they were election of a Constitutional Juan Vicente Gomez (1908-1935)- motivated by two alternative Assembly and, in 1947, the first did little
Recommended publications
  • Venezuela: Without Liberals, There Is No Liberalism · Econ Journal Watch
    Discuss this article at Journaltalk: http://journaltalk.net/articles/5894 ECON JOURNAL WATCH 12(3) September 2015: 375–399 Venezuela: Without Liberals, There Is No Liberalism Hugo J. Faria1 and Leonor Filardo2 LINK TO ABSTRACT Montesquieu’s view [is] that a republic (that is to say, what we would call democracy) rests upon the virtue of its citizens. Where the elementary public virtues are lacking, democracy can only lead to chaos which will end in dictatorship. —Stanislav Andreski, Parasitism and Subversion: The Case of Latin America (1969, 279) This report uncovers that there is not much liberal discourse or activity in Venezuela, nor has there been much in the country’s past. The moral and political culture of Venezuela is exceptionally unfavorable to liberalism. This article high- lights the dire consequences stemming from the absence of public virtues and the attendant paucity of pro-growth economic institutions. Some descriptions offered here are impressionistic, so it is especially ap- propriate to inform the reader that we, the present authors, are both Venezuelan and for many years have agonized over Venezuelan affairs to the extent of writing several books attempting to convince our political and entrepreneurial leaders to implement fundamental reforms to economic institutions. We believe in the protection of our God-given natural rights, which include freedom of speech and the cornerstones of economic freedom: personal choice, voluntary exchange, freedom to enter and compete in markets, and security of the person and of well- 1. University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124; Instituto de Estudios Superiores de Administración, Caracas, Venezuela. The authors kindly thank Jane S.
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining Chavismo
    Explaining Chavismo: The Unexpected Alliance of Radical Leftists and the Military in Venezuela under Hugo Chávez by Javier Corrales Associate Professor of Political Science Amherst College Amherst, MA 01002 [email protected] March 2010 1 Knowing that Venezuela experienced a profound case of growth collapse in the 1980s and 1990s is perhaps enough to understand why Venezuela experienced regime change late in the 1990s. Most political scientists agree with Przeworski et al. (2000) that severe economic crises jeopardize not just the incumbents, but often the very continuity of democratic politics in non-rich countries. However, knowledge of Venezuela’s growth collapse is not sufficient to understand why political change went in the direction of chavismo. By chavismo I mean the political regime established by Hugo Chávez Frías after 1999. Scholars who study Venezuelan politics disagree about the best label to describe the Hugo Chávez administration (1999-present): personalistic, popular, populist, pro-poor, revolutionary, participatory, socialist, Castroite, fascist, competitive authoritarian, soft- authoritarian, third-world oriented, hybrid, statist, polarizing, oil-addicted, ceasaristic, counter-hegemonic, a sort of Latin American Milošević, even political ―carnivour.‖ But there is nonetheless agreement that, at the very least, chavismo consists of a political alliance of radical-leftist civilians and the military (Ellner 2001:9). Chávez has received most political advice from, and staffed his government with, individuals who have an extreme-leftist past, a military background, or both. The Chávez movement is, if nothing else, a marriage of radicals and officers. And while there is no agreement on how undemocratic the regime has become, there is virtual agreement that chavismo is far from liberal democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Cuban Influence in Venezuela and Its Support for the Bolívarian Revolution James A
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital Commons Cedarville University DigitalCommons@Cedarville International Studies Capstone Research Papers Senior Capstone Papers 4-24-2015 Venecuba: An Analysis of Cuban Influence in Venezuela and its Support for the Bolívarian Revolution James A. Cohrs Cedarville University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/ international_studies_capstones Part of the International and Area Studies Commons Recommended Citation Cohrs, James A., "Venecuba: An Analysis of Cuban Influence in Venezuela and its Support for the Bolívarian Revolution" (2015). International Studies Capstone Research Papers. 1. http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/international_studies_capstones/1 This Capstone Project is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Cedarville, a service of the Centennial Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Studies Capstone Research Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Cedarville. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VENECUBA AN ANALYSIS OF CUBAN INFLUENCE IN VENEZUELA AND ITS SUPPORT FOR THE BOLÍVARIAN REVOLUTION __________________ A Paper Presented to Dr. Jenista Cedarville University __________________ In Fulfillment of the Requirements for INTL 4850-01 __________________ By James Cohrs April 24th, 2015 Cohrs 1 Introduction "I swear before you, I swear by the God of my fathers; by my forefathers themselves, by my honor and my country, that I shall never allow my hands to be idle or my soul to rest until I have broken the shackles which bind us to Spain!" (Roberts, 1949, p. 5). Standing on a hill in Rome, this was the oath pledged by Simón Bolívar, “El Libertador”, as he began his quest to liberate the Spanish-American colonies from Spanish rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Venezuela in the Gray Zone: from Feckless Pluralism to Dominant
    Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Sistema de Información Científica Myers, David J.; McCoy, Jennifer L. Venezuela in the gray zone: From feckless pluralism to dominant power system Politeia, núm. 30, enero-junio, 2003, pp. 41-74 Universidad Central de Venezuela Caracas, Venezuela Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=170033588002 Politeia, ISSN (Printed Version): 0303-9757 [email protected] Universidad Central de Venezuela Venezuela How to cite Complete issue More information about this article Journal's homepage www.redalyc.org Non-Profit Academic Project, developed under the Open Acces Initiative 41 REVISTA POLITEIAVENEZUELA, N° 30. INSTITUTO IN THE DE GRAY ESTUDIOS ZONE: POLÍTICOS FROM, FECKLESSUNIVERSIDAD PLURALISM CENTRAL DE TO VENEZUELA DOMINANT, 2003:41-74 POWER SYSTEM 30 Politeia Venezuela in the gray zone: From feckless pluralism to dominant power system Venezuela en la zona gris: desde el pluralismo ineficaz hacia el sistema de poder dominante David J. Myers / Jennifer L. McCoy Abstract Resumen This paper emphasizes the need to measure the El presente texto resalta la necesidad de medir las varying qualities of democracy. It delineates subtypes diversas cualidades de la democracia. En este senti- of political regimes that occupy a “gray zone” between do, delinea los diferentes tipos de regímenes políti- dictatorship and democracy, and examines the cos que se encuentran en la denominada “zona gris” possibilities for political change in the “gray zone”. entre la dictadura y la democracia. Asimismo exami- The authors address two sets of questions about na las posibilidades de cambio dentro de dicha zona political change: a) What causes a limitedly pluralist gris.
    [Show full text]
  • Pedro A. Palma
    PEDRO A. PALMA CURRICULUM VITAE Academia Nacional de Ciencias Económicas Ecoanalítica Palacio de las Academias Centro Comercial Mata de Coco Ave. Universidad Oficina 56, Piso 5 Bolsa a San Francisco Ave. Blandín, Chacao CARACAS, VENEZUELA CARACAS, VENEZUELA Phone: (58-212) 482-7842 Phone: (58-212) 266-9080 Fax: (58-212) 482-9330 Fax: (58-212) 266-5119 Mobile: (58-414) 708-8090 e-mail: [email protected] Web page: pedroapalma.com (under development) SCHOLASTIC BACKGROUND Ph.D. in Economics, University of Pennsylvania M.A. in Economics, University of Pennsylvania M.B.A., University of Pennsylvania, The Wharton School B.S. in Economics, (Cum Laude), Universidad Católica Andrés Bello, Caracas ACADEMIC BACKGROUND Professor Emeritus, Institute of Advanced Studies in Administration –IESA-, a graduate business school based in Caracas (Since September 2015) Professor of Economics, Institute of Advanced Studies in Administration –IESA (1982-2015) Assistant and Associate Professor at IESA (1974-1982) Visiting Professor, University Andrés Bello, Economics Graduate Program (1974 & 1977) Assistant Professor, University Andrés Bello, School of Economics (1967-1969) Instructor of Economic Theory, University Andrés Bello, School of Economics (1964-1967) NON-ACADEMIC PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND National Academy of Economic Sciences Founding Fellow (1984-present) President (2009-2011) Palma & Associates, financial and investment consultants, President (1997-2006) Booz - Allen & Hamilton Inc., Vice President (Partner) (1991-1997) MetroEconómica,
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela on The
    Memorandum of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela on the Application filed before the International Court of Justice by the Cooperative of Guyana on March 29th, 2018 ANNEX Table of Contents I. Venezuela’s territorial claim and process of decolonization of the British Guyana, 1961-1965 ................................................................... 3 II. London Conference, December 9th-10th, 1965………………………15 III. Geneva Conference, February 16th-17th, 1966………………………20 IV. Intervention of Minister Iribarren Borges on the Geneva Agreement at the National Congress, March 17th, 1966……………………………25 V. The recognition of Guyana by Venezuela, May 1966 ........................ 37 VI. Mixed Commission, 1966-1970 .......................................................... 41 VII. The Protocol of Port of Spain, 1970-1982 .......................................... 49 VIII. Reactivation of the Geneva Agreement: election of means of settlement by the Secretary-General of the United Nations, 1982-198371 IX. The choice of Good Offices, 1983-1989 ............................................. 83 X. The process of Good Offices, 1989-2014 ........................................... 87 XI. Work Plan Proposal: Process of good offices in the border dispute between Guyana and Venezuela, 2013 ............................................. 116 XII. Events leading to the communiqué of the UN Secretary-General of January 30th, 2018 (2014-2018) ....................................................... 118 2 I. Venezuela’s territorial claim and Process of decolonization
    [Show full text]
  • The Transformational Potential of Higher Education Inclusion
    n the fi eld of higher education research, one of the most fascinating observations is the consistent and permanent expansion of higher education systems worldwide since theI end of the Second World War. Undoubtedly, the predominant approach to address Jesús Humberto Pineda Olivieri these developments has been through quantitative analysis, as well as international comparisons. The following work examines the particularities of the Venezuelan context with the aim of identifying specifi c features of this worldwide phenomenon in this South The Transformational Potential American case. Through a combination of qualitative methods, the author proposes a of Higher Education Inclusion biographical approach for the study of higher education inclusion processes, which takes into account the perspectives and experiences of those who have been targeted by an ambitious higher education expansion process. The most distinctive feature of this work Biographical Trajectories of Students would be its methodological contribution to the fi eld of higher education research. One from Disadvantaged Environments could also argue that the ethnographic account of the Bolivarian Missions of education in Venezuela in Chavez’s Venezuela is both original and unprecedented. Furthermore, the writing approach bridges the interests of both academics, practitioners of the fi eld and members of the general public. Jesús Humberto Pineda Olivieri The Transformational Potential of Higher Education Inclusion ISBN: 978-3-86395-310-2 Universitätsverlag Göttingen Universitätsverlag
    [Show full text]
  • Preserving U.S. Interests in Latin America
    PRESERVING U.S. INTERESTS IN LATIN AMERICA by Liana Saldana A thesis submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts in Global Security Studies and Certificate in Intelligence Baltimore, Maryland August, 2015 ©2015 Liana Saldana All Rights Reserved Abstract Traditionally, Latin America has been politically weak and economically disadvantaged, whereas; the U.S. has prospered. The U.S. has traded and invested in Latin America despite concerns regarding its weakness. The U.S. has created policies to bolster the economic climate and political stability in Latin America without success. However, the bigger question is determining if these policies and initiatives were created to protect financial and political U.S. interests or as means of creating viable trade partners. These chapters will exemplify several policies and initiatives that have been unsuccessful in the areas of national security, energy security, and instilling democratization strategies. Many of these implemented policies were developed to remedy an immediate threat but not an overarching strategy for long-term change. Also, for the most part, many of these strategies were imposed on Latin America without a cooperative agreement for change. Each of these three chapters presents issues that began in Latin America and have impacted the U.S. The first chapter presents information regarding drug trafficking organizations (DTOs) and their role as a major national security issue for the U.S. Historically, DTOs have begun in states with weak rule of law and oversight. The hypothesis states that DTOs are able to destabilize their states of origin through recruitment and corruption efforts to expand their empire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of SYRIZA
    Encyclopedia of Anti-Revisionism On-Line Panos Petrou The making of SYRIZA Published: June 11, 2012. http://socialistworker.org/print/2012/06/11/the-making-of-syriza Transcription, Editing and Markup: Sam Richards and Paul Saba Copyright: This work is in the Public Domain under the Creative Commons Common Deed. You can freely copy, distribute and display this work; as well as make derivative and commercial works. Please credit the Encyclopedia of Anti-Revisionism On-Line as your source, include the url to this work, and note any of the transcribers, editors & proofreaders above. June 11, 2012 -- Socialist Worker (USA) -- Greece's Coalition of the Radical Left, SYRIZA, has a chance of winning parliamentary elections in Greece on June 17, which would give it an opportunity to form a government of the left that would reject the drastic austerity measures imposed on Greece as a condition of the European Union's bailout of the country's financial elite. SYRIZA rose from small-party status to a second-place finish in elections on May 6, 2012, finishing ahead of the PASOK party, which has ruled Greece for most of the past four decades, and close behind the main conservative party New Democracy. When none of the three top finishers were able to form a government with a majority in parliament, a date for a new election was set -- and SYRIZA has been neck-and-neck with New Democracy ever since. Where did SYRIZA, an alliance of numerous left-wing organisations and unaffiliated individuals, come from? Panos Petrou, a leading member of Internationalist Workers Left (DEA, by its initials in Greek), a revolutionary socialist organisation that co-founded SYRIZA in 2004, explains how the coalition rose to the prominence it has today.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Politics and Social Polarisation in Venezuela 1998-2004
    1 Working Paper no.76 THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF ANTI- POLITICS AND SOCIAL POLARISATION IN VENEZUELA, 1998-2004 Jonathan DiJohn Crisis States Research Centre December 2005 Copyright © Jonathan DiJohn, 2005 Although every effort is made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of material published in this Working Paper, the Crisis States Research Centre and LSE accept no responsibility for the veracity of claims or accuracy of information provided by contributors. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission in writing of the publisher nor be issued to the public or circulated in any form other than that in which it is published. Requests for permission to reproduce this Working Paper, of any part thereof, should be sent to: The Editor, Crisis States Research Centre, DESTIN, LSE, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE. Crisis States Research Centre The Political Economy of Anti-Politics and Social Polarisation in Venezuela 1998-2004 Jonathan DiJohn Crisis States Research Centre In the past twenty years, there has been a sharp decline in party politics and the rise of what can best be described as a new form of populist politics. Nowhere has this trend been more evident than in Latin America in the 1990s, particularly in the Andean region.1 One common theme in this trend is the rise of leaders who denounce politics by attacking political parties as the source of corruption, social exclusion and poor economic management of the
    [Show full text]
  • Venezuela: Issues for Congress, 2013-2016
    Venezuela: Issues for Congress, 2013-2016 Mark P. Sullivan Specialist in Latin American Affairs January 23, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R43239 Venezuela: Issues for Congress, 2013-2016 Summary Although historically the United States had close relations with Venezuela, a major oil supplier, friction in bilateral relations increased under the leftist, populist government of President Hugo Chávez (1999-2013), who died in 2013 after battling cancer. After Chávez’s death, Venezuela held presidential elections in which acting President Nicolás Maduro narrowly defeated Henrique Capriles of the opposition Democratic Unity Roundtable (MUD), with the opposition alleging significant irregularities. In 2014, the Maduro government violently suppressed protests and imprisoned a major opposition figure, Leopoldo López, along with others. In December 2015, the MUD initially won a two-thirds supermajority in National Assembly elections, a major defeat for the ruling United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV). The Maduro government subsequently thwarted the legislature’s power by preventing three MUD representatives from taking office (denying the opposition a supermajority) and using the Supreme Court to block bills approved by the legislature. For much of 2016, opposition efforts were focused on recalling President Maduro through a national referendum, but the government slowed down the referendum process and suspended it indefinitely in October. After an appeal by Pope Francis, the government and most of the opposition (with the exception of Leopoldo López’s Popular Will party) agreed to talks mediated by the Vatican along with the former presidents of the Dominican Republic, Spain, and Panama and the head of the Union of South American Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Cambios Institucionales: La Descentralización En Venezuela
    Convergencia. Revista de Ciencias Sociales ISSN: 1405-1435 [email protected] Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México México Ramírez, José Cambios Institucionales: La Descentralización en Venezuela Convergencia. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, vol. 9, núm. 29, mayo-agosto, 2002 Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México Toluca, México Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=10502904 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Cambios Institucionales: La Descentralización en Venezuela José Ramírez Medina Universidad de Oriente Núcleo Sucre, Cumaná, Venezuela Resumen: Este artículo presenta un esbozo de un conjunto de hechos históricos ocurridos en el transcurrir de los siglos XIX y XX, concebidos como antecedentes de la descentralización en Venezuela. Esos acontecimientos son interpretados y analizados dentro del amplio contexto político de la organización y consolidación del Estado, desde los inicios de la República en el siglo XIX hasta la creación de la Comisión Presidencial para la Reforma del Estado (COPRE) en 1984. Palabras clave: Federalismo, regionalización, descentralización, Estado, modernización, desarrollo. Abstract: This article presents a sketch of a joint of historical events who happened in the course of the XIX and XX centuries and these are conceived as antecedents of Venezuelan descentralization. Those events are interpreted and analysed within the wide political context of the organization and consolidation of the State from the beginnings of the Republic in the XIX century until the creation of the Presidential Commission for the Reformation of the State (COPRE) in 1984.
    [Show full text]