Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS), (B)(6), (B)(7)(C) (B)(6), (B)(7)(C) NCIS (Report No
INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 4800 MARK CENTER DRIVE ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA 22350-1500 MAR 2 5 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR PRINCIPAL DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL SUBJECT: Report oflnvestigation - (b)(6), (b)(7)(C) (b)(6), (b)(7)(C)Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS), (b)(6), (b)(7)(C) (b)(6), (b)(7)(C) NCIS (Report No. 20121205-003105) We recently completed an investigation to address allegations that, (b)(6), (b)(7)(C) (b)(6), (b)(7)(C) NCIS, (b)(6), (b)(7)(C) mismanaged the NCIS mobility program, including improper management directed transfers, and wasted Government resources in implementing the program. We did not substantiate the allegations. We found that (b)(6), (b)(7)(C) (b)(6), (b)(7)(C) conveyed to the Secretary of the Navy (b)(6),detailed (b)(7)(C) vision for using the NCIS mobility program to improve mission effectiveness. We found that (b)(6), (b)(7)(C) directed (b)(6), (b)(7)(C)to implement the mobility program consistent with that vision, and that (b)(6), (b)(7)(C) did so. We found that total employee transfers, including management directed transfers, increased substantially in Fiscal Year 2012. However, we also found that the average transfer cost for management directed transfers was substantially less than transfer costs for voluntary transfers. We evaluated our findings against DoD, Department of the Navy, and NCIS regulations governing mobility programs for civilian employees, as well as against the Joint Ethics Regulations. We determined (b)(6), (b)(7)(C) decisions were consistent with regulation and the expenditure of Government resources in implementing the mobility program was not extravagant, careless, or needless.
[Show full text]