DOCSLIB.ORG

Yr Eglwys Anglicanaidd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Yr Eglwys Anglicanaidd Yr Eglwys Anglicanaidd Adroddiad yr Ymchwiliad Hydref 2020 2020 Yr Eglwys Anglicanaidd Diogelu yn Eglwys Loegr a'r Eglwys yng Nghymru Adroddiad yr Ymchwiliad Hydref 2020 Adroddiad y Panel Ymchwilio Yr Athro Alexis Jay OBE Yr Athro Syr Malcolm Evans KCMG OBE Ivor Frank Drusilla Sharpling CBE © Hawlfraint y Goron 2020 Gall testun y ddogfen hon (mae hyn yn eithrio, lle bo'n bresennol, yr Arfbais Frenhinol a phob logo adrannol neu asiantaeth) gael ei ailgynhyrchu am ddim mewn unrhyw fformat neu gyfrwng ar yr amod ei fod yn cael ei ailgynhyrchu'n gywir a heb fod mewn cyd-destun camarweiniol. Mae'n rhaid i'r deunydd gael ei gydnabod fel hawlfraint y Goron a rhaid cyfeirio'n benodol at deitl y ddogfen. Lle nodwyd deunydd trydydd parti, rhaid ceisio caniatâd gan ddeiliad yr hawlfraint. Dylid anfon unrhyw ymholiadau ynglŷn â'r cyhoeddiad hwn i [email protected] neu Freepost IICSA INDEPENDENT INQUIRY. Mae'r cyhoeddiad hwn ar gael yn https://www.iicsa.org.uk/publications CCS0620778888 10/20 Argraffwyd ar bapur â lleiafswm cynnwys 75% o ffibr wedi ei ailgylchu. Argraffwyd yn y DU gan APS Group ar ran Rheolwr Swyddfa Llyfrfa Ei Mawrhydi. Cynnwys Crynodeb Gweithredol v Portreadau pen ix Rhan A: Cyflwyniad 1 A.1: Cefndir yr ymchwiliad 2 A.2: Eglwys Loegr 2 A.3: Yr Eglwys yng Nghymru 6 A.4: Methodoleg 8 A.5: Terminoleg 10 A.6: Cyfeiriadau 11 Rhan B: Eglwys Loegr 13 B.1: Diogelu yn Eglwys Loegr 14 B.1.1: Cyflwyniad 14 B.1.2: Strwythurau diogelu 15 B.1.3: Polisïau diogelu 25 B.1.4: Diogelu wrth recriwtio a hyfforddi 27 B.1.5: Adolygiadau o arfer diogelu 36 B.2: Adrodd am gamdriniaeth yn Eglwys Loegr 48 B.2.1: Cyflwyniad 48 B.2.2: Adrodd ac ymchwilio mewnol 48 B.2.3: Adrodd allanol 52 B.2.4: Darpariaeth cwnsela a chymorth bugeiliol 53 B.3: Disgyblaeth clerigwyr 57 B.3.1: Cyflwyniad 57 B.3.2: Gweithdrefn o dan y Mesur Disgyblaeth Clerigwyr 57 B.3.3: Effeithiolrwydd disgyblaeth clerigwyr 61 B.4: Hawliadau sifil ac iawndal yn Eglwys Loegr 64 B.4.1: Cyflwyniad 64 B.4.2: Hawliadau sifil yn Eglwys Loegr 64 B.4.3: Materion allweddol mewn hawliadau sifil yn erbyn Eglwys Loegr 66 B.4.4: AN-A4 ac adolygiad Elliott 68 B.4.5: Honiadau yn erbyn unigolion sydd wedi marw 70 B.5: Sêl y gyffes 72 B.5.1: Cyflwyniad 72 B.5.2: Robert Waddington 72 B.5.3: Sêl y gyffes yn Eglwys Loegr 74 B.5.4: Adrodd gorfodol 78 B.6: Diwylliant Eglwys Loegr 80 B.6.1: Cyflwyniad 80 B.6.2: Pryderon ynghylch diwylliant Eglwys Loegr 80 B.6.3: Mentrau diweddar i wella diwylliant Eglwys Loegr 82 B.6.4: Camau pellach i'w cymryd 86 Rhan C: Yr Eglwys yng Nghymru 89 1 Cyflwyniad 90 C.2: Strwythur yr Eglwys yng Nghymru 91 C.3: Diogelu yn yr Eglwys yng Nghymru 92 C.4: Recriwtio a hyfforddi clerigwyr yn yr Eglwys yng Nghymru 96 C.5: Ymateb i gamdriniaeth yn yr Eglwys yng Nghymru 99 C.6: Adolygiadau o achosion y gorffennol 101 C.7: Samplau o waith achos diogelu yn yr Eglwys yng Nghymru 104 Rhan D: Casgliadau ac argymhellion 107 Ch.1: Casgliadau mewn perthynas ag Eglwys Loegr 108 Ch.2: Casgliadau mewn perthynas â'r Eglwys yng Nghymru 114 Ch.3: Materion i'w harchwilio ymhellach gan yr Ymchwiliad 115 Ch.4: Argymhellion 116 Atodiadau 119 Annex 1: Trosolwg o’r broses a’r dystiolaeth a gafwyd gan yr Ymchwiliad 120 Annex 2: Geirfa 136 Annex 3: Dadansoddiad arbenigol o ffeiliau achosion diogelu 143 Crynodeb Gweithredol Mae'r ymchwiliad hwn yn ymwneud â'r graddau y gwnaeth Eglwys Loegr a'r Eglwys yng Nghymru amddiffyn plant rhag cam-drin rhywiol yn y gorffennol. Mae hefyd yn archwilio effeithiolrwydd y trefniadau diogelu cyfredol. Cynhaliwyd gwrandawiad cyhoeddus yn y meysydd penodol hyn yn 2019. Mae'r adroddiad hwn hefyd yn tynnu gwybodaeth o'r ddwy astudiaeth achos flaenorol ar yr Eglwys Anglicanaidd, a oedd yn ymwneud ag Esgobaeth Chichester a Peter Ball. Yn ogystal ag argymhellion a wnaed yn yr astudiaethau achos, rydym yn gwneud wyth argymhelliad yn yr adroddiad hwn, sy'n ymdrin â meysydd megis disgyblaeth clerigwyr, rhannu gwybodaeth a chefnogaeth i ddioddefwyr a goroeswyr. Byddwn yn dychwelyd at faterion eraill a godwyd yn yr ymchwiliad hwn, megis adrodd gorfodol, yn adroddiad terfynol yr Ymchwiliad. Eglwys Loegr Eglwys Loegr yw'r enwad Cristnogol mwyaf yn y wlad, gyda dros filiwn o addolwyr rheolaidd. Mae euogfarnau o gam-drin plant yn rhywiol gan bobl a oedd yn glerigwyr neu mewn swyddi o ymddiriedaeth sy'n gysylltiedig â'r Eglwys yn dyddio'n ôl i'r 1940au. Cyfanswm nifer y troseddwyr a gafwyd yn euog sy'n gysylltiedig â'r Eglwys o'r 1940au hyd at 2018 yw 390. Yn 2018, adroddwyd i'r Eglwys am 449 o bryderon ynghylch cam- drin plant yn rhywiol yn y gorffennol agos, yr oedd mwy na hanner ohonynt yn ymwneud â swyddogion yr eglwys. Ers tro, roedd cryn dipyn o droseddu yn cynnwys lawrlwytho neu feddu ar ddelweddau anweddus o blant. Archwiliodd yr Ymchwiliad nifer o achosion yn ymwneud â thramgwyddwyr a gafwyd yn euog a thramgwyddwyr honedig, gyda llawer ohonynt yn dangos methiant yr Eglwys i gymryd datgeliadau gan blant neu amdanynt o ddifrif neu i gyfeirio honiadau at yr awdurdodau statudol. Roedd y rhain yn cynnwys: • Timothy Storey, a oedd yn arweinydd ieuenctid yn Esgobaeth Llundain rhwng 2002 a 2007. Defnyddiodd ei rôl i feithrin perthynas â merched yn eu harddegau. Ar hyn o bryd, mae Storey yn gwneud tymor o 15 mlynedd yn y carchar am sawl trosedd yn erbyn plant, gan gynnwys treisio. Roedd wedi cyfaddef gweithgarwch rhywiol gyda merch yn ei harddegau i staff esgobaethol flynyddoedd cyn ei euogfarn, ond gwadodd orfodaeth. • Victor Whitsey, a oedd yn Esgob Caer rhwng 1974 a 1982. Cwynodd tri ar ddeg o bobl i Heddlu Swydd Gaer am gam-drin rhywiol gan Whitsey ac mae Eglwys Loegr yn ymwybodol o chwe achwynydd arall. Roedd yr honiadau’n cynnwys ymosodiad rhywiol ar fechgyn a merched yn eu harddegau wrth ddarparu cefnogaeth fugeiliol iddynt. Bu farw ym 1987. • Y Parchedig Trevor Devamanikkam, a oedd yn offeiriad tan 1996. Ym 1984 a 1985, honnir iddo dreisio ac ymosod yn anweddus ar fachgen yn ei arddegau, Matthew Ineson, ar sawl achlysur pan oedd y bachgen yn byw yn ei dŷ. O 2012 ymlaen, cyflwynodd y Parchedig Matthew Ineson nifer o ddatgeliadau i’r Eglwys ac mae wedi cwyno am ymateb yr Eglwys. Cafodd Devamanikkam ei gyhuddo yn 2017 a lladdodd ei hun y diwrnod cyn ei ymddangosiad yn y llys. v Yr Eglwys Anglicanaidd: Adroddiad Ymchwiliad Rhwng 2003 a 2018, rheolodd prif yswiriwr Eglwys Loegr (y Swyddfa Yswiriant Eglwysig) 217 o hawliadau yn ymwneud â cham-drin plant yn rhywiol yn yr Eglwys. Fe wnaeth diwylliant Eglwys Loegr ei hwyluso i ddod yn lle y gallai camdrinwyr guddio. Roedd ufuddhau i awdurdod yr Eglwys ac offeiriaid unigol, tabŵs ynghylch trafod rhywioldeb ac amgylchedd lle'r oedd tramgwyddwyr honedig yn cael eu trin yn fwy cefnogol na dioddefwyr yn cyflwyno rhwystrau rhag datgelu na allai llawer o ddioddefwyr eu goresgyn. Agwedd arall ar ddiwylliant yr Eglwys oedd clercyddiaeth, a olygai fod awdurdod moesol clerigwyr yn cael ei ystyried yn eang fel rhywbeth y tu hwnt i waradwydd. Fel rydym wedi dweud mewn adroddiadau eraill, mae sefydliadau ffydd megis yr Eglwys Anglicanaidd yn cael eu nodi gan eu pwrpas moesol penodol, wrth addysgu da a drwg. Yng nghyd- destun cam-drin plant yn rhywiol, roedd esgeulustod yr Eglwys o les corfforol, emosiynol ac ysbrydol plant a phobl ifanc o blaid amddiffyn ei henw da yn gwrthdaro â'i chenhadaeth o gariad a gofal am y diniwed a'r bregus. Mae newid diwylliant yn cael ei gynorthwyo gan uwch arweinwyr yr Eglwys sydd bellach yn dweud y pethau iawn, ond bydd angen mwy nag ystrydebau i newid yn barhaus. Bydd angen parhau i bwysleisio natur ffiaidd cam-drin plant yn rhywiol a phwysigrwydd diogelu yn holl leoliadau'r Eglwys. Gwnaethom archwilio pa mor dda yr oedd yr arferion diogelu cyfredol yn yr Eglwys yn ymateb i fater cam-drin plant yn rhywiol. Tan yn ddiweddar, o leiaf 2015, ni ddyrannodd Eglwys Loegr ddigon o adnoddau i ddiogelu. Mae cyllid wedi cynyddu'n sylweddol, yn enwedig ar gyfer staff diogelu. Mae newid diweddar arall yn golygu na ddylai uwch glerigwyr anwybyddu cyngor staff diogelu os nad ydyn nhw'n hoffi'r cyngor a roddir iddyn nhw. Serch hynny, darganfuwyd enghreifftiau o hyn yn parhau i ddigwydd yn y samplu ffeiliau a gynhaliwyd ar ran yr Ymchwiliad. Esgobion esgobaethol sydd â'r cyfrifoldeb eithaf am ddiogelu o fewn esgobaeth, ac nid yw cynghorwyr diogelu esgobaethol (DSAs) yn darparu “gwrth-bwysau digonol i awdurdod esgobol” yn ôl Mr Colin Perkins (DSA ar gyfer Esgobaeth Chichester).1 Daethom i'r casgliad mai swyddogion diogelu esgobaethol – nid clerigwyr – sydd yn y sefyllfa orau i benderfynu pa achosion i'w cyfeirio at yr awdurdodau statudol, a pha gamau y dylai'r Eglwys eu cymryd i gadw plant yn ddiogel. Mae gan esgobion esgobaethol ran bwysig i'w chwarae, ond ni ddylent fod â chyfrifoldeb gweithredol am ddiogelu. O ran eglwysi cadeiriol, mae'r Eglwys wedi cynnig nifer o newidiadau a ddylai integreiddio diogelu mewn eglwysi cadeiriol i brif ffrwd strwythurau diogelu'r Eglwys, er bod llawer i'w wneud o hyd i sicrhau bod plant yn cael eu diogelu'n well mewn eglwysi cadeiriol a'u hysgolion côr cysylltiedig.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A La Torre Aaker Aalbers Aaldert Aarmour Aaron
    A LA TORRE ABDIE ABLEMAN ABRAMOWITCH AAKER ABE ABLES ABRAMOWITZ AALBERS ABEE ABLETSON ABRAMOWSKY AALDERT ABEEL ABLETT ABRAMS AARMOUR ABEELS ABLEY ABRAMSEN AARON ABEKE ABLI ABRAMSKI AARONS ABEKEN ABLITT ABRAMSON AARONSON ABEKING ABLOTT ABRAMZON AASEN ABEL ABNER ABRASHKIN ABAD ABELA ABNETT ABRELL ABADAM ABELE ABNEY ABREU ABADIE ABELER ABORDEAN ABREY ABALOS ABELES ABORDENE ABRIANI ABARCA ABELI ABOT ABRIL ABATE ABELIN ABOTS ABRLI ABB ABELL ABOTSON ABRUZZO ABBA ABELLA ABOTT ABSALOM ABBARCROMBIE ABELLE ABOTTS ABSALON ABBAS ABELLS ABOTTSON ABSHALON ABBAT ABELMAN ABRAHAM ABSHER ABBATE ABELS ABRAHAMER ABSHIRE ABBATIELLO ABELSON ABRAHAMI ABSOLEM ABBATT ABEMA ABRAHAMIAN ABSOLOM ABBAY ABEN ABRAHAMOF ABSOLON ABBAYE ABENDROTH ABRAHAMOFF ABSON ABBAYS ABER ABRAHAMOV ABSTON ABBDIE ABERCROMBIE ABRAHAMOVITZ ABT ABBE ABERCROMBY ABRAHAMOWICZ ABTS ABBEKE ABERCRUMBIE ABRAHAMS ABURN ABBEL ABERCRUMBY ABRAHAMS ABY ABBELD ABERCRUMMY ABRAHAMSEN ABYRCRUMBIE ABBELL ABERDEAN ABRAHAMSOHN ABYRCRUMBY ABBELLS ABERDEEN ABRAHAMSON AC ABBELS ABERDEIN ABRAHAMSSON ACASTER ABBEMA ABERDENE ABRAHAMY ACCA ABBEN ABERG ABRAHM ACCARDI ABBERCROMBIE ABERLE ABRAHMOV ACCARDO ABBERCROMMIE ABERLI ABRAHMOVICI ACE ABBERCRUMBIE ABERLIN ABRAHMS ACERO ABBERDENE ABERNATHY ABRAHMSON ACESTER ABBERDINE ABERNETHY ABRAM ACETO ABBERLEY ABERT ABRAMCHIK ACEVEDO ABBETT ABEYTA ABRAMCIK ACEVES ABBEY ABHERCROMBIE ABRAMI ACHARD ABBIE ABHIRCROMBIE ABRAMIN ACHENBACH ABBING ABIRCOMBIE ABRAMINO ACHENSON ABBIRCROMBIE ABIRCROMBIE ABRAMO ACHERSON ABBIRCROMBY ABIRCROMBY ABRAMOF ACHESON ABBIRCRUMMY ABIRCROMMBIE ABRAMOFF
    [Show full text]
  • RXMP-Activities-At-1978 79.Pdf
    4^% , 4r I. » > ^J^^" This is the first occasion pn wSicli we have produced a repoil roseby about 10% -^i productivity iniprovemqit. We are aiming for prmcipally for employees aj-Mitcheldean. It is part of a growing'^ j at least similar growth and improvements in the current year. /^ompany response to the lieedfe of those who work for the Rank A^itionally, we'y^nt gSQre than twice as much oh new tooling and! lntlt)duction •TT«^»^''°^:.^'^®fPr'^^ should read as arsupplement to the Raiik fixed assets agw^ia^^^ off in deprebiation.This,als6 is very healthy. ^l?J«^^^n.f^cn3tio'^i Review,-which vvas..^eIiveFed to you earlier Despite stfh^dis^pokjitingtjndustrial relations stoppage's, total. production is running,at t'tfe'iHithestJei'dtor some years. Let this - *^ • EVdi^yene ^sociated with the comparryoperations at Mitcheldean tfven be'our first objective p^itlje remainder of1979 and irflo th,e.' • kjidwSij^dt.we have had some troublesometiines in the past few •next decadeVto'maintaiiS t^isi^^y-^ort on all of our production .. .j^V^yearSover meeting our production targets—and however good we lines so that we become oneef the most consistendy productive,-.'. • J**\ -^^reiri mahyof t|je tl^ngs we do, production targets will remain the-y.-': plants in the Xerox world. This way shall attract our share of-.^ ! . •, key objective of'pi^'liie at i^litcheldean.They have to be met by th?; investment for-^the future, enabling the site as a whole to provi^d;' Tj .« hour, by the day,"fey'lHe wea^,by-the month —there can be nio that security so important to all of us who work in it.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Inquiry Into the Implications of Removing Refundable Franking Credits
    The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia Report on the inquiry into the implications of removing refundable franking credits House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics April 2019 Canberra © Commonwealth of Australia 2019 ISBN 978-1-76092-005-0 (Printed version) ISBN 978-1-76092-006-7 (HTML version) This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License. The details of this licence are available on the Creative Commons website: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/. Foreword On 19 September 2018, the Treasurer, the Hon Josh Frydenberg, MP, referred to the committee an inquiry into the removal of refundable franking credits. The Treasurer asked the committee to inquire into and report on the implications of removing refundable franking credits and, in particular, the stress and complexity it will cause for Australians, including older Australians who will be impacted in their retirement. The public response to the inquiry has been extraordinary. The committee held a series of 19 public hearings across the country to allow Australians to have their say in light of a policy proposed to be introduced on 1 July 2019. These hearings were very well attended – often exceeding 300 people. A total of 1777 submissions were published and many more documents were received that could not be published by the time the committee reported. While the participation in the inquiry was high, worryingly the evidence suggests that many people at risk of being impacted from a policy change are unaware of the proposal that could result in them losing a third of their income.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anglican Church
    The Anglican Church Investigation Report October 2020 2020 The Anglican Church Safeguarding in the Church of England and the Church in Wales Investigation Report October 2020 A report of the Inquiry Panel Professor Alexis Jay OBE Professor Sir Malcolm Evans KCMG OBE Ivor Frank Drusilla Sharpling CBE © Crown copyright 2020 The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the document title specified. Where third‑party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries related to this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] or Freepost IICSA INDEPENDENT INQUIRY. This publication is available at https://www.iicsa.org.uk/publications CCS0620778888 10/20 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled‑fibre content minimum. Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Contents Executive Summary v Pen portraits ix Part A: Introduction 1 A.1: Background to the investigation 2 A.2: The Church of England 2 A.3: The Church in Wales 6 A.4: Methodology 7 A.5: Terminology 10 A.6: References 11 Part B: The Church of England 13 B.1: Safeguarding in the Church of England 14 B.1.1: Introduction 14 B.1.2: Safeguarding structures 15 B.1.3: Safeguarding policies 25 B.1.4: Safeguarding in recruitment
    [Show full text]
  • Local Election Results 2006
    Local Election Results 4th May 2006 Andrew Teale Version 0.10.1 August 22, 2010 2 LOCAL ELECTION RESULTS 2006 Typeset by LATEX Compilation and design © Andrew Teale, 2006–2010. The author grants permission to copy and distribute this work in any medium, provided this notice is preserved. This file is available for download from http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/ Please advise the author of any corrections which need to be made by email: [email protected] Contents Introduction and Abbreviations6 I London Boroughs8 1 North London9 1.1 Barking and Dagenham.......................9 1.2 Barnet................................... 11 1.3 Brent.................................. 14 1.4 Camden................................ 17 1.5 Ealing.................................. 20 1.6 Enfield................................. 23 1.7 Hackney................................ 25 1.8 Hammersmith and Fulham..................... 29 1.9 Haringey................................. 31 1.10 Harrow................................. 33 1.11 Havering................................ 36 1.12 Hillingdon............................... 39 1.13 Hounslow............................... 42 1.14 Islington................................ 44 1.15 Kensington and Chelsea....................... 47 1.16 Newham................................ 49 1.17 Redbridge............................... 53 1.18 Tower Hamlets............................ 56 1.19 Waltham Forest............................ 59 1.20 Westminster............................... 61 2 South London 65 2.1 Bexley.................................
    [Show full text]
  • Local Election Results 2006
    Local Election Results May 2006 Andrew Teale July 29, 2013 2 LOCAL ELECTION RESULTS 2006 Typeset by LATEX Compilation and design © Andrew Teale, 2011. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled “GNU Free Documentation License”. This file is available for download from http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/ The LATEX source code is available for download at http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/pdf/2006/2006-source.zip Please advise the author of any corrections which need to be made by email: [email protected] Change Log 29 July 2013: Corrected gain information for Derby. Chaddesden ward was a Labour hold; Chellaston ward was a Labour gain from Conservative. 23 June 2013: Corrected result for Plymouth, Southway. The result previously shown was for a June 2006 by-election. Contents I London Boroughs 11 1 North London 12 1.1 Barking and Dagenham....................... 12 1.2 Barnet.................................. 14 1.3 Brent.................................. 17 1.4 Camden................................ 20 1.5 Ealing.................................. 23 1.6 Enfield................................. 26 1.7 Hackney................................ 28 1.8 Hammersmith and Fulham...................... 31 1.9 Haringey................................ 33 1.10 Harrow................................. 36 1.11 Havering................................ 39 1.12 Hillingdon............................... 42 1.13 Hounslow............................... 45 1.14 Islington................................ 47 1.15 Kensington and Chelsea....................... 50 1.16 Newham................................ 52 1.17 Redbridge............................... 56 1.18 Tower Hamlets...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Old Herefordians' Newsletter 2013
    OlD HeReFORDians’ Club newsletteR 2013 President’s Report 2013 From the Development Office: When reading through this year’s Look Forward, Look Back, Remember and Dream. Old Herefordians’ Newsletter, or any As I reflect on the last twelve months, it is the sound of previously, we see an update of voices raised in excitement that comes most frequently former pupils from all generations to my mind and the echoes of OHs’ remembrances of and realise just how diverse and far ‘their time at School’ as they re-visit School House, Old spread we all are. Wherever we Block, the Library, No1 and Old Deanery. Eager and engaging conversations become robust, excited and end up in the world, through loud as Helen Pearson and I escort groups around the jobs or family, we remain buildings. Those places, still so familiar that are both Old Herefordians and I different and unchanged by turns hold a power and think this bond from our magic; love it or hate it, time at school leaves a strong time at school that ties us impression. all is still as much a part of The School has hosted several gatherings including the school and its ethos the OH Regatta, OH Day, Leavers of 1993, Leavers today as it ever was. of 1984 (informal), and a gathering for all associated The Old Herefordians’ Club is continuing to move with No 1. In addition there has been a full programme forward in a strong position through its committee and in London including the OH in London gatherings and those involved with its work.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Par Sh Registers. Marriages
    No r fo l k P a r i s ]; t e r s . ( marriages. m m u n - 4c W 1 WW/k } m an 771 g :n EDI TE D B Y w. P. w. PH ILL M E I OR M A. , . , AND N FREDERIC JOH SON . V OL . I V. I oubou B Y “ PH I LLI M R E ISS U ED TO THE S U BSCR I BERS O Co . , 12 HAN RY LANE . 4, C CE 1909 . P R E F A C E . The four th volume of the Marriage Registers of Nor folk is now placed in the hands of the subscribers . Of rs n f the nine Registe i cluded , six date rom the n r n n r o sixtee th centu y , the remai i g th ee bel ng to the succeeding century . f s o o fo r n r , As be o e, entrie are reduced to a c mm m and the following contractions have been freely used = = t e w . wi wer do . o th ar of. do or . , wi w p p ish = = in er n an. o . n the o n f m u o . s . s st s o p , i gle w c i c ty = = n. dio . in he helor n m a c t d o of. b . b ac or s s , i gle i ce e = ' = f lz . m r r i u h er . c a a e en d . da g t o g lic ce .
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL DOCUMENT.Indd
    London Councils' Directory 2007 A GUIDE TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN LONDON London Councils (formerly the Association of London Government) 591/2 Southwark Street, London SE1 0AL Tel: 020 7934 9999 Fax: 020 7934 9991 ISBN: 1 85494 121 6 Price £35.00* September 2006 *£17.50 to London boroughs & voluntary organisations 1 2 CONTENTS About us 7 Greater London Employment Forum 11 Grants Committee 12 Leaders’ Committee 10 Staff 14 Transport and Environment Committee 13 London Government A brief history 17 Recent changes to London’s government 17 The London boroughs 19 Borough election results 2006 21 Town Hall addresses 24 About the data 27 The London boroughs Barking and Dagenham 28 Barnet 33 Bexley 40 Brent 46 Bromley 52 Camden 58 Croydon 63 Ealing 69 Enfield 76 Greenwich 82 Hackney 89 Hammersmith and Fulham 95 Haringey 100 Harrow 107 Havering 113 Hillingdon 119 Hounslow 125 Islington 132 Kensington and Chelsea 137 Kingston upon Thames 143 Lambeth 150 Lewisham 156 Merton 161 Newham 166 3 CONTENTS The London boroughs (continued) Redbridge 173 Richmond upon Thames 181 Southwark 188 Sutton 195 Tower Hamlets 201 Waltham Forest 208 Wandsworth 214 Westminster 222 City of London 228 Greater London Authority 236 London Development Agency 239 London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority 241 Metropolitan Police Authority 244 Transport for London 246 London MPs 247 London MEPs 249 Government departments 250 London local government professional associations 253 Health care in London 256 London Learning and Skills Councils 262 Other useful addresses 265 Media
    [Show full text]
  • London Government Directory Greater London Enterprise
    London government directory Greater London Enterprise Property investment and development Programme management and consulting Commercial finance Enterprise development London’s economic development company bringing commercial know-how to public policy, and delivering economic regeneration .gle.co.uk For more information, please contact: Greater London Enterprise www 28 Park Street London SE1 9EQ Tel: 020 7403 0300 [email protected] www.gle.co.uk The London Government Directory 2006 A GUIDE TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN A A GUIDE TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN LONDON ©Association of London Government 591/2 Southwark Street, London SE1 0AL Tel: 020 7934 9999 Fax: 020 7934 9991 ISBN: 1 85494 165 8 Price £35.00* September 2005 *£17.50 to London boroughs & voluntary organisations 1 Minimum Environmental Impact for Maximum Printed Impact! Photograph by Jeff [email protected] Every year Sprinters looks at the way we affect our environment and how we can reduce waste when printing the literature our capital city needs. This year we have introduced a new press which operates on a waterless litho system with fully recyclable plates. The result is less chemistry and a more energy efficient output while still offering a full range of recycled papers and boards. For more information about Sprinters please call or visit our website. Sprinters (London) Limited Churchill House, 114 Windmill Road, Brentford, Middlesex TW8 9NB Tel: 020 8847 2128 Fax: 020 8569 8681 ISDN: 020 8560 9547 [email protected] www.sprinters.co.uk CONTENTS London Government A brief history
    [Show full text]
  • Local Election Results 2006
    Local Election Results 4th May 2006 Andrew Teale Version 0.02 March 16, 2008 2 LOCAL ELECTION RESULTS 2006 Typeset by LATEX Compilation and design © Andrew Teale, 2008. The author grants permission to copy and distribute this work in any medium, provided this notice is preserved. This file (in several formats) is available for download from http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/ Please advise the author of any corrections which need to be made by email: [email protected] Contents Introduction and Abbreviations5 I London Boroughs7 1 North London8 1.1 Barking and Dagenham.......................8 1.2 Barnet................................... 11 1.3 Brent.................................. 14 1.4 Camden................................ 17 1.5 Ealing.................................. 20 1.6 Enfield................................. 24 1.7 Hackney................................ 27 1.8 Hammersmith and Fulham...................... 31 1.9 Haringey................................ 34 1.10 Harrow................................. 37 1.11 Havering................................ 40 1.12 Hillingdon............................... 45 1.13 Hounslow............................... 49 1.14 Islington................................. 51 1.15 Kensington and Chelsea....................... 55 1.16 Newham................................ 58 1.17 Redbridge................................ 61 1.18 Tower Hamlets............................ 64 1.19 Waltham Forest............................ 68 1.20 Westminster.............................. 72 2 South London 75 2.1 Bexley.................................
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Parish Registers. Marriages
    Ji i m [eaEogy collection ALLEN COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY 3 1833 00729 6582 Gc 9 42, 61 01 Aal p v. 4 Norfolk parish register Marriages NORFOLK PARI S H REGISTERS n>arriagc6. IV. phillimore's parish register series. vol. xcv. (norfolk, vol. iv.) One hundred and fifty printed. : Norfolk Parish Registers. Carriages. Edited by W. P. W. PHILLIMORE, M.A., B.C.L., AND FREDERIC JOHNSON. Q^ FOZ. IV. \(.f Itondon Issued to the Subscribers by Phillimore & Co., 124, Chancery Lane. 1909. — PREFACE The fourth volume of the Marriage Registers of Norfolk is now placed in the hands of the subscribers. Of the nine Registers included, six date from the sixteenth century, the remaining three belong to the succeeding century. As before, entries are reduced to a common form, and the following contractions have been freely used : w.=widower, or widow. p.=ot the parish ol. s.=spinster, single woman. co.=in the county of. b.=bachelor, or single man. dioc.=in the diocese of. d.=daughter of. /«V.=marriage licence. For the transcription of the Registers, the Editors have to acknowledge the valuable assistance of Dr. W. T. Bensley, the Rev. E. Kinaston, the Rev. R. A. Oram, the Rev. J. G. Poole, and the Rev. R. Fetzer Taylor and Miss Fetzer Taylor, who contributed two Registers, Hickling was tran- scribed by Mr. Johnson. Thanks are due to the clergy who have given permission for these records to be printed. Their names are mentioned under the respective parishes. J_0 / 9 1.3l It is of the highest importance that we should not delay in printing the Registers as rapidly as possibly, as this is the only way in which their contents can be effectively preserved.
    [Show full text]