Newsletter Winter 2009/10
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
New Southwark Plan Proposed Submission Version: Duty to Cooperate Statement
New Southwark Plan Proposed Submission Version: Duty to Cooperate Statement 1 Introduction New Southwark Plan 1.1 The New Southwark Plan (NSP) will be the regeneration strategy and development plan (along with the London Plan) for Southwark. The final NSP will replace the saved policies of the Southwark Plan 2007 and the Core Strategy 2011 and will be used to set out the council’s aspirations for regeneration and to make decisions on planning applications. The preparation has involved open consultation since October 2013 with many versions being subject to considerable meaningful discussion with residents, businesses, landowners, developers and other public bodies. 1.2 The NSP has been prepared with full regard to the adopted London Plan 2016 and joint work on the emerging new London Plan. The London Plan is legally part of each of London’s local planning authorities’ development plan and must be taken into account when planning decisions are taken in any part of London. The London Plan provides the strategic, London-wide policy context for borough local development plan documents (DPD); all local DPDs and Neighbourhood Plans have to be ‘in general conformity’ with the London Plan. 1.3 The NSP is currently at the Proposed Submission Version stage and is the subject of consultation. Several stages of consultation have already been undertaken for the NSP. Between November 2013 and March 2014 the council carried out an informal stage of consultation through a survey focused on the borough’s high streets. The Issues and Options version of the NSP was consulted on from October 2014 to March 2015. -
1 8 March 2017 Deputy Mayor for London, Joanne Mccartney, Joins
8 March 2017 Deputy Mayor for London, Joanne McCartney, joins Lambeth primary school children for a mesmerizing performance of Romeo and Juliet Download images of the Deputy Mayor’s visit here Deputy Mayor for London, Joanne McCartney, today joined children from Archbishop Sumner Primary School in Lambeth to experience the National Theatre’s latest production for primary schools. This spring, more than 12,000 young people will see the NT’s tour for younger audiences of Romeo and Juliet and Macbeth, with these productions visiting 27 schools across the capital and playing on stage at the National Theatre and Stratford Circus. The NT is continuing its commitment to touring live theatre to schools across London with its latest production of Romeo and Juliet. The production is a modern twist on Shakespeare’s classic love story set against a vibrant urban backdrop with excitement, colour, dancing and live song. A company of eight present a contemporary celebration of Shakespeare's masterpiece suitable for children aged 8 – 12yrs. Lisa Burger, Executive Director at the National Theatre said: “We believe that it is important for children and young people of all ages to have access to high quality, engaging theatre and we are committed to giving young people access to inspirational theatre and embedding the arts as a vital part of the curriculum. In 2017, we are offering young people across London the opportunity to see Shakespeare productions in their primary and secondary schools as we realise that for many teachers, it is often the logistics of bringing a whole year group to the theatre which can be the barrier to young people accessing world-class theatre. -
A La Torre Aaker Aalbers Aaldert Aarmour Aaron
A LA TORRE ABDIE ABLEMAN ABRAMOWITCH AAKER ABE ABLES ABRAMOWITZ AALBERS ABEE ABLETSON ABRAMOWSKY AALDERT ABEEL ABLETT ABRAMS AARMOUR ABEELS ABLEY ABRAMSEN AARON ABEKE ABLI ABRAMSKI AARONS ABEKEN ABLITT ABRAMSON AARONSON ABEKING ABLOTT ABRAMZON AASEN ABEL ABNER ABRASHKIN ABAD ABELA ABNETT ABRELL ABADAM ABELE ABNEY ABREU ABADIE ABELER ABORDEAN ABREY ABALOS ABELES ABORDENE ABRIANI ABARCA ABELI ABOT ABRIL ABATE ABELIN ABOTS ABRLI ABB ABELL ABOTSON ABRUZZO ABBA ABELLA ABOTT ABSALOM ABBARCROMBIE ABELLE ABOTTS ABSALON ABBAS ABELLS ABOTTSON ABSHALON ABBAT ABELMAN ABRAHAM ABSHER ABBATE ABELS ABRAHAMER ABSHIRE ABBATIELLO ABELSON ABRAHAMI ABSOLEM ABBATT ABEMA ABRAHAMIAN ABSOLOM ABBAY ABEN ABRAHAMOF ABSOLON ABBAYE ABENDROTH ABRAHAMOFF ABSON ABBAYS ABER ABRAHAMOV ABSTON ABBDIE ABERCROMBIE ABRAHAMOVITZ ABT ABBE ABERCROMBY ABRAHAMOWICZ ABTS ABBEKE ABERCRUMBIE ABRAHAMS ABURN ABBEL ABERCRUMBY ABRAHAMS ABY ABBELD ABERCRUMMY ABRAHAMSEN ABYRCRUMBIE ABBELL ABERDEAN ABRAHAMSOHN ABYRCRUMBY ABBELLS ABERDEEN ABRAHAMSON AC ABBELS ABERDEIN ABRAHAMSSON ACASTER ABBEMA ABERDENE ABRAHAMY ACCA ABBEN ABERG ABRAHM ACCARDI ABBERCROMBIE ABERLE ABRAHMOV ACCARDO ABBERCROMMIE ABERLI ABRAHMOVICI ACE ABBERCRUMBIE ABERLIN ABRAHMS ACERO ABBERDENE ABERNATHY ABRAHMSON ACESTER ABBERDINE ABERNETHY ABRAM ACETO ABBERLEY ABERT ABRAMCHIK ACEVEDO ABBETT ABEYTA ABRAMCIK ACEVES ABBEY ABHERCROMBIE ABRAMI ACHARD ABBIE ABHIRCROMBIE ABRAMIN ACHENBACH ABBING ABIRCOMBIE ABRAMINO ACHENSON ABBIRCROMBIE ABIRCROMBIE ABRAMO ACHERSON ABBIRCROMBY ABIRCROMBY ABRAMOF ACHESON ABBIRCRUMMY ABIRCROMMBIE ABRAMOFF -
The London Assembly Annual Report 2016-17
ELECTED BY YOU – WORKING FOR LONDONERS The London Assembly Annual Report 2016-17 Holding the Mayor to account and investigating issues that matter to Londoners Contents Foreword ........................................................................................................................ 5 About us .......................................................................................................................... 8 Our committees ............................................................................................................ 10 The work of our committees ........................................................................................ 17 1. Money, money, money ..................................................................................... 18 2. Watching the wheels in London ........................................................................ 21 3. Law and order .................................................................................................... 25 4. In residence ....................................................................................................... 31 5. The big picture ................................................................................................... 35 6. Getting down to business .................................................................................. 38 7. Talking about regeneration ............................................................................... 42 8. In good health ................................................................................................... -
London 2030 and Beyond Report of the King’S Commission on London
The Policy Institute at King’s London 2030 and beyond Report of the King’s Commission on London MARCH 2018 About the Policy Institute at King’s The Policy Institute addresses complex policy and practice challenges with rigorous research, academic expertise and analysis focused on improving outcomes. Our vision is to contribute to building an ecosystem that enables the translation of research to inform policy and practice, and the translation of policy and practice needs into a demand-focused research culture. We do this by bringing diverse groups together, facilitating engagement between academic, business, philanthropic, clinical and policy communities around current and future societal issues. kcl.ac.uk/sspp/policy-institute @policyatkings The Policy Institute at King’s King’s College London Virginia Woolf Building 22 Kingsway London, WC2B 6LE For more information about this report, please contact Tony Halmos at [email protected] or on +44 (0)20 7848 2749 © The Policy Institute at King’s College London 4 London 2030 and Beyond | Report of the King’s Commission on London INTRODUCTION About the Commission The King’s Commission on London was convened in February 2016 by the Policy Institute at King’s College London. As stated in King’s Vision 2029, King’s is a civic university at the heart of London. The project was conceived as a time-limited, multi-disciplinary investigation of the major challenges faced by the university’s home city. The Commission was designed to connect research by world-leading academics at King’s with oversight from high-profile figures and experts from across the capital. -
London 2030 and Beyond Report of the King’S Commission on London
The Policy Institute at King’s London 2030 and beyond Report of the King’s Commission on London MARCH 2018 About the Policy Institute at King’s The Policy Institute addresses complex policy and practice challenges with rigorous research, academic expertise and analysis focused on improving outcomes. Our vision is to contribute to building an ecosystem that enables the translation of research to inform policy and practice, and the translation of policy and practice needs into a demand-focused research culture. We do this by bringing diverse groups together, facilitating engagement between academic, business, philanthropic, clinical and policy communities around current and future societal issues. kcl.ac.uk/sspp/policy-institute @policyatkings The Policy Institute at King’s King’s College London Virginia Woolf Building 22 Kingsway London, WC2B 6LE For more information about this report, please contact Tony Halmos at [email protected] or on +44 (0)20 7848 2749 © The Policy Institute at King’s College London 4 London 2030 and Beyond | Report of the King’s Commission on London INTRODUCTION About the Commission The King’s Commission on London was convened in February 2016 by the Policy Institute at King’s College London. As stated in King’s Vision 2029, King’s is a civic university at the heart of London. The project was conceived as a time-limited, multi-disciplinary investigation of the major challenges faced by the university’s home city. The Commission was designed to connect research by world-leading academics at King’s with oversight from high-profile figures and experts from across the capital. -
Le Smart City Nell'agenda Digitale
LE SMART CITY NELL’AGENDA DIGITALE 17 OTTOBRE 2013 SMART CITY EXHIBITION – BOLOGNA Joe Mitton Senior Advisor to Deputy Mayor of London for Business and Enterprise Mi dispiace non parlo italiano quindi parlerò in Inglese The Mayor of London and the Deputy Mayor are in China this week, promoting London to a new generation of young Chinese people, some of whom will hopefully come study, work or do business in London. But they wanted me to come to Bologna to represent them, as the Smart Cities agenda is vitally important for London and the UK. I’ll start by talking about our general approach to the Smart Cities agenda, and then move on to the work we are doing for the digital economy. Our general approach to Smart Cities in London has been to ask ourselves – “what makes us different as a city?” We are a specific kind of city. Very large – the largest in the EU. Very diverse and open to visitors and immigrants. London is home to some extraordinary wealth, but also pockets of some of the most deprived people in Europe, living right next to great wealth and the financial and banking centre of Europe. That presents opportunities but also challenges for making London a Smart City. Our philosophy is this: A smarter city will adapt better to the needs of the people, it will use technology to help us make energy savings, it will encourage behaviour change, including shifting people into cycling and public transport, it will help plan the placement of facilities and infrastructure where people require them to be. -
RXMP-Activities-At-1978 79.Pdf
4^% , 4r I. » > ^J^^" This is the first occasion pn wSicli we have produced a repoil roseby about 10% -^i productivity iniprovemqit. We are aiming for prmcipally for employees aj-Mitcheldean. It is part of a growing'^ j at least similar growth and improvements in the current year. /^ompany response to the lieedfe of those who work for the Rank A^itionally, we'y^nt gSQre than twice as much oh new tooling and! lntlt)duction •TT«^»^''°^:.^'^®fPr'^^ should read as arsupplement to the Raiik fixed assets agw^ia^^^ off in deprebiation.This,als6 is very healthy. ^l?J«^^^n.f^cn3tio'^i Review,-which vvas..^eIiveFed to you earlier Despite stfh^dis^pokjitingtjndustrial relations stoppage's, total. production is running,at t'tfe'iHithestJei'dtor some years. Let this - *^ • EVdi^yene ^sociated with the comparryoperations at Mitcheldean tfven be'our first objective p^itlje remainder of1979 and irflo th,e.' • kjidwSij^dt.we have had some troublesometiines in the past few •next decadeVto'maintaiiS t^isi^^y-^ort on all of our production .. .j^V^yearSover meeting our production targets—and however good we lines so that we become oneef the most consistendy productive,-.'. • J**\ -^^reiri mahyof t|je tl^ngs we do, production targets will remain the-y.-': plants in the Xerox world. This way shall attract our share of-.^ ! . •, key objective of'pi^'liie at i^litcheldean.They have to be met by th?; investment for-^the future, enabling the site as a whole to provi^d;' Tj .« hour, by the day,"fey'lHe wea^,by-the month —there can be nio that security so important to all of us who work in it. -
Protocol on Mayoral Appointments
Protocol on Mayoral appointments July 2018 A. Introduction 1. The purpose of the Protocol is to set out how the Mayor of London will comply with the Principles of Public Life and associated best practice when making appointments. The Principles are set out in the table immediately below. Selflessness Holders of public office should act solely in terms of the public interest. They should not do so in order to gain financial or other benefits for themselves, their family or their friends. Integrity Holders of public office should not place themselves under any financial or other obligation to outside individuals or organisations that might seek to influence them in the performance of their official duties. Objectivity In carrying out public business, including making public appointments, awarding contracts, or recommending individuals for rewards and benefits, holders of public office should make choices on merit. Accountability Holders of public office are accountable for their decisions and actions to the public and must submit themselves to whatever scrutiny is appropriate to their office. Openness Holders of public office should be as open as possible about all the decisions and actions that they take. They should give reasons for their decisions and restrict information only when the wider public interest clearly demands. Honesty Holders of public office have a duty to declare any private interests relating to their public duties and to take steps to resolve any conflicts arising in a way that protects the public interest. Leadership Holders of public office should promote and support these principles by leadership and example. 2. The Mayor makes a wide range of appointments. -
Report on the Inquiry Into the Implications of Removing Refundable Franking Credits
The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia Report on the inquiry into the implications of removing refundable franking credits House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics April 2019 Canberra © Commonwealth of Australia 2019 ISBN 978-1-76092-005-0 (Printed version) ISBN 978-1-76092-006-7 (HTML version) This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License. The details of this licence are available on the Creative Commons website: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/. Foreword On 19 September 2018, the Treasurer, the Hon Josh Frydenberg, MP, referred to the committee an inquiry into the removal of refundable franking credits. The Treasurer asked the committee to inquire into and report on the implications of removing refundable franking credits and, in particular, the stress and complexity it will cause for Australians, including older Australians who will be impacted in their retirement. The public response to the inquiry has been extraordinary. The committee held a series of 19 public hearings across the country to allow Australians to have their say in light of a policy proposed to be introduced on 1 July 2019. These hearings were very well attended – often exceeding 300 people. A total of 1777 submissions were published and many more documents were received that could not be published by the time the committee reported. While the participation in the inquiry was high, worryingly the evidence suggests that many people at risk of being impacted from a policy change are unaware of the proposal that could result in them losing a third of their income. -
London Recovery Missions: Consultation
London Recovery Missions: Consultation Response from the London Housing Panel to the GLA’s request to provide early stage feedback on the eight Recovery Missions identified by the Board For further information about this response please contact the London Housing Panel Secretariat by emailing [email protected] and [email protected] About the London Housing Panel The London Housing Panel was set up in 2019 ‘to enable London’s voluntary and community sector and the communities it serves to influence the capital’s housing policies and practices’. The Panel’s work is underpinned by three principles: • There is an urgent need to build more social housing in London to tackle its housing crisis and we will always push for prioritising the building of and increasing the amount of, social rented housing over other forms of tenure. • By understanding the needs and aspirations of all Londoners, including those who are living most vulnerably, we can ensure house building creates better longer-term outcomes for Londoners. • In addition to the building of new, stable homes at social rent, we want more action taken now to address homelessness, particularly statutory homelessness. In March 2020, the Panel published its Priorities for the Mayor. The Mayor’s response to the Panel’s priorities can be found here. Later that month the Panel wrote a public letter, London Housing Panel requests urgent response to COVID-19 pandemic, to The Rt Hon Robert Jenrick MP, Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government and The Rt Hon Dr Thérèse Coffey MP, Secretary of State for Work and Pensions. -
LA Behind the L Plan
S S S !"# $$$% %& % '()*+,# - ()*+,,.* /!#*.0#,#( 1 2 & 2- Chair’s foreword This report contains the London Assembly’s Planning and Spatial Development Committee’s response to the Mayor’s draft London Plan. Our response consists of 28 formal representations: five representations supporting, nine representations expressing conditional support for, and 14 representations objecting to particular aspects of the Plan; and a letter to the Mayor from Trevor Phillips, Chair of the London Assembly, and myself as Chair of the Assembly’s Planning and Spatial Development Committee. These were submitted to the Mayor on 27 September 2002. Our representations on the draft London Plan build on the recommendations of the scrutiny investigation conducted last year into Towards the London Plan, the Mayor’s initial proposals for the spatial development strategy1. We took evidence from the Mayor, the Association of London Government and the London Development Agency at meetings of the Planning and Spatial Development Committee, and received comments from other Assembly committees – Transport, Environment, and Economic and Social Development. We have decided to publish this material in report format because we wish to continue our contribution to the ongoing public debate about London’s future development. Our letter to the Mayor summarises the main themes detailed in our representations. We reiterate our strong support for the Mayor’s vision of London as an exemplary sustainable world city, and we welcome the many instances where the Mayor has moved in response to some of our earlier recommendations. We really want the London Plan to work. However, as when we scrutinised Towards the London Plan, we find ourselves expressing concern as to whether London’s predicted growth can be accommodated in a sustainable way.