Pct.1 Pct.2 Adj P

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pct.1 Pct.2 Adj P Supplementary material Gut Supplementary Table 3. Marker genes in each malignant epithelial cells cluster Gene Log(Fold-change) Pct.1 Pct.2 Adj p- value Cluster LEFTY1 2.690865644 0.899 0.067 0.00E+00 C1 TFF2 2.186713379 0.855 0.36 0.00E+00 C1 CCT2 1.701377329 0.801 0.283 0.00E+00 C1 SPINK4 1.663911876 0.654 0.128 0.00E+00 C1 TFF3 1.632604627 0.882 0.43 0.00E+00 C1 CXCL17 1.616238928 0.659 0.079 0.00E+00 C1 LDHB 1.407263152 0.711 0.137 0.00E+00 C1 CLDN18 1.398880496 0.825 0.278 0.00E+00 C1 TESC 1.382790712 0.79 0.212 0.00E+00 C1 PDIA6 1.295630983 0.789 0.404 0.00E+00 C1 PSCA 1.263596359 0.922 0.241 0.00E+00 C1 SRD5A3 1.246561606 0.586 0.098 0.00E+00 C1 PDIA4 1.180717046 0.849 0.419 0.00E+00 C1 DPCR1 1.175754587 0.506 0.06 0.00E+00 C1 WBP5 1.163957541 0.734 0.106 0.00E+00 C1 LYZ 1.141614179 0.969 0.727 0.00E+00 C1 RAP1B 1.125989315 0.68 0.255 0.00E+00 C1 S100P 1.055862172 0.962 0.758 0.00E+00 C1 OS9 1.05478066 0.787 0.338 0.00E+00 C1 R3HDM2 1.031695733 0.742 0.167 0.00E+00 C1 B3GNT7 1.031632795 0.549 0.088 0.00E+00 C1 MORF4L1 1.023176967 0.768 0.409 0.00E+00 C1 TMEM165 0.999912261 0.649 0.196 0.00E+00 C1 GALNT3 0.995165397 0.705 0.254 0.00E+00 C1 TFF1 0.962929536 0.96 0.591 0.00E+00 C1 LY6D 0.94328396 0.484 0.007 0.00E+00 C1 MIA 0.895355862 0.623 0.103 0.00E+00 C1 MDM2 0.864864363 0.615 0.089 0.00E+00 C1 YEATS4 0.864197638 0.585 0.128 0.00E+00 C1 CPM 0.831257805 0.511 0.026 0.00E+00 C1 NGFRAP1 0.776686405 0.552 0.027 0.00E+00 C1 TCEAL8 0.747773737 0.549 0.064 0.00E+00 C1 SFTA2 0.710176136 0.52 0.066 0.00E+00 C1 FKBP10 0.567908872 0.427 0.007 0.00E+00 C1 HOXB2 0.52009395 0.466 0.03 0.00E+00 C1 ALDH1L1 0.478075328 0.386 0.009 0.00E+00 C1 BCAR4 0.405445074 0.384 0 0.00E+00 C1 YWHAE 0.941441648 0.797 0.453 6.63E-301 C1 MUC5B 0.749504079 0.441 0.032 9.41E-296 C1 PKM 1.024781554 0.835 0.518 4.67E-293 C1 ATP1B1 1.094054311 0.838 0.514 5.73E-290 C1 PRKCDBP 0.521875888 0.445 0.04 1.78E-288 C1 PTP4A2 1.006611051 0.74 0.358 1.11E-281 C1 RAB34 0.379470725 0.394 0.022 1.26E-279 C1 C1QBP 1.055652495 0.699 0.29 1.74E-277 C1 AGR2 1.043123785 0.967 0.832 7.02E-277 C1 Zhang M, et al. Gut 2020;0:1–12. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320368 Supplementary material Gut VSIG1 0.728079807 0.537 0.093 8.17E-275 C1 NUP107 0.744204709 0.569 0.123 2.00E-274 C1 REG4 1.083913316 0.905 0.499 1.30E-270 C1 RP11-10A14.5 0.297216094 0.321 0 2.05E-269 C1 PTPLAD1 0.947636123 0.666 0.255 8.18E-269 C1 KRT17 0.903244887 0.401 0.03 1.67E-268 C1 DSTN 0.854726665 0.853 0.613 3.41E-268 C1 GALNT7 0.709216869 0.631 0.165 7.55E-268 C1 TFPI 0.753551093 0.647 0.186 1.34E-262 C1 HSP90AB1 0.844714478 0.922 0.665 7.40E-262 C1 SRSF9 0.978838275 0.658 0.282 6.15E-261 C1 GPR110 0.792021592 0.397 0.033 1.05E-256 C1 YWHAQ 0.917645011 0.684 0.318 3.66E-256 C1 SCGB2A1 0.350719764 0.323 0.005 1.20E-255 C1 DCTN2 0.855691592 0.617 0.219 2.39E-255 C1 CDK4 0.96724454 0.603 0.204 5.51E-255 C1 BEX2 0.312185722 0.323 0.006 1.10E-252 C1 ZFAND6 0.859643177 0.62 0.228 7.87E-251 C1 HSP90B1 0.894697739 0.881 0.592 7.89E-251 C1 RP11-2E17.1 0.333995995 0.3 0 1.03E-250 C1 CSTB 1.133047426 0.85 0.649 1.19E-248 C1 ULBP2 0.349850496 0.325 0.009 4.54E-247 C1 PUM1 0.730101664 0.655 0.226 1.47E-245 C1 CLIC1 1.06446547 0.835 0.65 1.46E-244 C1 BACE2 0.776146486 0.629 0.21 1.42E-242 C1 ANXA5 0.701165432 0.568 0.159 9.35E-239 C1 ZFC3H1 0.677887382 0.611 0.17 8.10E-234 C1 MAL2 0.952741646 0.742 0.397 1.27E-233 C1 MBD6 0.504246192 0.497 0.097 3.90E-231 C1 RBM47 0.886709293 0.705 0.357 5.12E-229 C1 TUBB 0.948856295 0.719 0.338 1.85E-228 C1 RAB3IP 0.740840685 0.566 0.161 5.86E-226 C1 SMC5 0.620713614 0.591 0.179 4.29E-224 C1 PIP4K2C 0.444414038 0.423 0.064 6.67E-223 C1 SLC35E3 0.422166937 0.392 0.05 3.86E-221 C1 ARL14 1.302472547 0.738 0.367 1.90E-220 C1 ANXA10 0.781303497 0.751 0.311 4.97E-220 C1 FRS2 0.36581964 0.368 0.039 5.55E-219 C1 SERINC2 0.751146496 0.785 0.471 1.10E-218 C1 HMGA1 0.836465129 0.781 0.485 1.33E-218 C1 C8orf4 0.869162861 0.726 0.288 7.08E-215 C1 RP11-519G16.5 0.275871768 0.278 0.005 2.19E-214 C1 FDFT1 0.88076215 0.625 0.257 6.92E-212 C1 TMED2 0.851218937 0.676 0.347 6.88E-210 C1 KRT19 0.82881006 0.969 0.874 4.18E-209 C1 CHMP1B 0.767154492 0.692 0.311 8.40E-209 C1 MTDH 0.719515427 0.792 0.488 4.07E-208 C1 RAB32 0.275438262 0.344 0.032 1.08E-204 C1 Zhang M, et al. Gut 2020;0:1–12. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320368 Supplementary material Gut RAB21 0.481720994 0.478 0.11 8.39E-204 C1 CAP1 0.845841827 0.641 0.316 3.80E-203 C1 MYL12A 0.947954026 0.817 0.649 7.09E-203 C1 SDCBP 0.777669854 0.685 0.346 1.33E-202 C1 STARD10 0.733799598 0.854 0.536 1.36E-202 C1 SRP9 0.782786299 0.677 0.355 4.62E-202 C1 AHR 0.538273196 0.573 0.167 5.71E-202 C1 AKIRIN1 0.47764806 0.499 0.126 1.29E-201 C1 PDIA3 0.795061975 0.766 0.484 2.87E-197 C1 AKAP13 0.749638262 0.693 0.319 4.44E-197 C1 DST 0.680727101 0.706 0.282 5.07E-197 C1 TSPAN31 0.445008926 0.459 0.103 4.70E-196 C1 ANXA1 0.990611597 0.623 0.236 2.26E-195 C1 ANXA2 0.923005092 0.867 0.733 1.09E-194 C1 TFPT 0.433556663 0.492 0.12 3.67E-194 C1 SYNE4 0.276709421 0.295 0.018 5.91E-194 C1 PABPC1 0.58828564 0.933 0.752 9.95E-194 C1 MGST1 0.72142683 0.648 0.274 3.87E-193 C1 HIST1H2BK 0.845917465 0.665 0.342 6.48E-193 C1 MAGED1 0.397100639 0.427 0.082 1.45E-192 C1 CRK 0.526217931 0.559 0.178 2.04E-192 C1 TSPAN3 0.754095483 0.776 0.493 1.67E-191 C1 AGAP2 0.324034798 0.251 0.005 1.72E-191 C1 ARMCX3 0.393037375 0.435 0.087 9.19E-191 C1 MARS 0.507454194 0.464 0.107 1.66E-190 C1 RAN 0.831480759 0.747 0.465 1.81E-190 C1 ECI2 0.572148619 0.455 0.112 3.03E-190 C1 RHBDL2 0.416071426 0.456 0.102 9.05E-190 C1 HSPA5 0.813668975 0.775 0.442 5.45E-189 C1 ICAM2 0.282680792 0.283 0.017 1.47E-188 C1 CTSE 0.630732705 0.717 0.316 1.78E-187 C1 ZNF430 0.427332087 0.379 0.063 2.47E-187 C1 TM4SF1 1.0672273 0.705 0.377 4.05E-187 C1 VAPA 0.771645976 0.65 0.343 1.27E-186 C1 RCAN1 0.635068931 0.409 0.077 5.09E-186 C1 FRMD4B 0.610702297 0.43 0.092 1.65E-185 C1 DDIT3 0.796008573 0.606 0.219 1.93E-185 C1 PRPF4B 0.740129307 0.815 0.408 7.56E-184 C1 ABCF1 0.663423185 0.722 0.338 8.01E-184 C1 LDLR 0.774135152 0.71 0.337 2.04E-183 C1 TSPAN13 0.69173611 0.603 0.26 3.34E-183 C1 ACTR2 0.644131887 0.651 0.298 1.18E-182 C1 RAB11FIP1 0.797810148 0.766 0.437 3.38E-181 C1 NDUFV2 0.780467632 0.671 0.38 5.18E-180 C1 KRT7 0.686045312 0.698 0.306 1.03E-179 C1 NMB 0.452105539 0.428 0.099 1.55E-179 C1 SQLE 0.820767424 0.628 0.258 1.61E-179 C1 ADAM17 0.421792244 0.455 0.111 2.05E-178 C1 Zhang M, et al.
Recommended publications
  • Supplementary Methods
    SUPPLEMENTARY METHODS Epilepsy cohorts Epilepsy cohorts contributing to the meta-analysis are detailed below. EPIGEN (Reported by – Chantal Depondt, Sanjay Sisodiya, Norman Delanty, Gianpiero Cavalleri, Erin Heinzen and David Goldstein) The EPIGEN study consisted of epilepsy cohorts from Beaumont Hospital Dublin (Ireland), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB, Belgium), Duke University Medical Centre (North Carolina, USA) and University College Hospital London (UK). Inclusion Criteria: Except for Duke, only adult (>16 years) patients with epilepsy were recruited. Exclusion Criteria: No specific exclusion criteria. Quality assurance: At all sites, subjects were recruited and phenotyped by experienced epilepsy specialists. At Duke, all cases underwent independent case-record review by an epilepsy nurse specialist, and ambiguous diagnoses were re-evaluated by a second epileptologist. If the diagnosis remained unclear, then the patient was excluded from the study. For London, all cases underwent review by independent epileptologists. For Brussels, study PI (Chantal Depondt) reviewed the classification of all cases by case-note review. For Dublin, no systematic quality assurance was undertaken. Site-specific details for each EPIGEN cohort as organized for the analysis are as follows: – EPIGEN-Dublin Patients were recruited from a specialized epilepsy clinic at Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. Patients were mostly of Irish ethnicity. Patients were genotyped on the Illumina platform using a combination of chips (610-Quad+550+300v1/Omni1-Quad). – EPIGEN-Brussels Patients were recruited from epilepsy clinics at UZ Gasthuisberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, and Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles. Patients were largely of Belgian ethnicity. Patients were genotyped on the Illumina platform using a combination of chips (610-Quad/300 V1 & V2).
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Figures 1-14 and Supplementary References
    SUPPORTING INFORMATION Spatial Cross-Talk Between Oxidative Stress and DNA Replication in Human Fibroblasts Marko Radulovic,1,2 Noor O Baqader,1 Kai Stoeber,3† and Jasminka Godovac-Zimmermann1* 1Division of Medicine, University College London, Center for Nephrology, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK. 2Insitute of Oncology and Radiology, Pasterova 14, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 3Research Department of Pathology and UCL Cancer Institute, Rockefeller Building, University College London, University Street, London WC1E 6JJ, UK †Present Address: Shionogi Europe, 33 Kingsway, Holborn, London WC2B 6UF, UK TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Supplementary Figures 1-14 and Supplementary References. Figure S-1. Network and joint spatial razor plot for 18 enzymes of glycolysis and the pentose phosphate shunt. Figure S-2. Correlation of SILAC ratios between OXS and OAC for proteins assigned to the SAME class. Figure S-3. Overlap matrix (r = 1) for groups of CORUM complexes containing 19 proteins of the 49-set. Figure S-4. Joint spatial razor plots for the Nop56p complex and FIB-associated complex involved in ribosome biogenesis. Figure S-5. Analysis of the response of emerin nuclear envelope complexes to OXS and OAC. Figure S-6. Joint spatial razor plots for the CCT protein folding complex, ATP synthase and V-Type ATPase. Figure S-7. Joint spatial razor plots showing changes in subcellular abundance and compartmental distribution for proteins annotated by GO to nucleocytoplasmic transport (GO:0006913). Figure S-8. Joint spatial razor plots showing changes in subcellular abundance and compartmental distribution for proteins annotated to endocytosis (GO:0006897). Figure S-9. Joint spatial razor plots for 401-set proteins annotated by GO to small GTPase mediated signal transduction (GO:0007264) and/or GTPase activity (GO:0003924).
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic and Pharmacological Approaches to Preventing Neurodegeneration
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2012 Genetic and Pharmacological Approaches to Preventing Neurodegeneration Marco Boccitto University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Neuroscience and Neurobiology Commons Recommended Citation Boccitto, Marco, "Genetic and Pharmacological Approaches to Preventing Neurodegeneration" (2012). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 494. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/494 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/494 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Genetic and Pharmacological Approaches to Preventing Neurodegeneration Abstract The Insulin/Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 Signaling (IIS) pathway was first identified as a major modifier of aging in C.elegans. It has since become clear that the ability of this pathway to modify aging is phylogenetically conserved. Aging is a major risk factor for a variety of neurodegenerative diseases including the motor neuron disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). This raises the possibility that the IIS pathway might have therapeutic potential to modify the disease progression of ALS. In a C. elegans model of ALS we found that decreased IIS had a beneficial effect on ALS pathology in this model. This beneficial effect was dependent on activation of the transcription factor daf-16. To further validate IIS as a potential therapeutic target for treatment of ALS, manipulations of IIS in mammalian cells were investigated for neuroprotective activity. Genetic manipulations that increase the activity of the mammalian ortholog of daf-16, FOXO3, were found to be neuroprotective in a series of in vitro models of ALS toxicity.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table S4. FGA Co-Expressed Gene List in LUAD
    Supplementary Table S4. FGA co-expressed gene list in LUAD tumors Symbol R Locus Description FGG 0.919 4q28 fibrinogen gamma chain FGL1 0.635 8p22 fibrinogen-like 1 SLC7A2 0.536 8p22 solute carrier family 7 (cationic amino acid transporter, y+ system), member 2 DUSP4 0.521 8p12-p11 dual specificity phosphatase 4 HAL 0.51 12q22-q24.1histidine ammonia-lyase PDE4D 0.499 5q12 phosphodiesterase 4D, cAMP-specific FURIN 0.497 15q26.1 furin (paired basic amino acid cleaving enzyme) CPS1 0.49 2q35 carbamoyl-phosphate synthase 1, mitochondrial TESC 0.478 12q24.22 tescalcin INHA 0.465 2q35 inhibin, alpha S100P 0.461 4p16 S100 calcium binding protein P VPS37A 0.447 8p22 vacuolar protein sorting 37 homolog A (S. cerevisiae) SLC16A14 0.447 2q36.3 solute carrier family 16, member 14 PPARGC1A 0.443 4p15.1 peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, coactivator 1 alpha SIK1 0.435 21q22.3 salt-inducible kinase 1 IRS2 0.434 13q34 insulin receptor substrate 2 RND1 0.433 12q12 Rho family GTPase 1 HGD 0.433 3q13.33 homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase PTP4A1 0.432 6q12 protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA, member 1 C8orf4 0.428 8p11.2 chromosome 8 open reading frame 4 DDC 0.427 7p12.2 dopa decarboxylase (aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase) TACC2 0.427 10q26 transforming, acidic coiled-coil containing protein 2 MUC13 0.422 3q21.2 mucin 13, cell surface associated C5 0.412 9q33-q34 complement component 5 NR4A2 0.412 2q22-q23 nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 2 EYS 0.411 6q12 eyes shut homolog (Drosophila) GPX2 0.406 14q24.1 glutathione peroxidase
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Transcriptionally Impaired De Novo Mutations Contribute to The
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/175844; this version posted November 26, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Post-transcriptionally impaired de novo mutations 2 contribute to the genetic etiology of four neuropsychiatric 3 disorders 4 5 Fengbiao Mao1,2¶, Lu Wang3¶, Xiaolu Zhao2, Zhongshan Li4, Luoyuan Xiao5, 6 Rajesh C. Rao2, Jinchen Li4, Huajing Teng1*, Xin He6*, and Zhong Sheng Sun1,4* 7 8 1 Beijing Institutes of Life Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, 9 China. 10 2 Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. 11 3 Institute of Life Science, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China. 12 4 Institute of Genomic Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, 13 China 14 5 Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 15 100084, China. 16 6 Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 17 18 ¶These authors contributed equally to this work 19 * Corresponding authors 20 E-mail: 21 [email protected] (Z.S.S.) 22 [email protected] (X.H.) 23 [email protected] (H.T.) 24 25 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/175844; this version posted November 26, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]
  • A Trafficome-Wide Rnai Screen Reveals Deployment of Early and Late Secretory Host Proteins and the Entire Late Endo-/Lysosomal V
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/848549; this version posted November 19, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 A trafficome-wide RNAi screen reveals deployment of early and late 2 secretory host proteins and the entire late endo-/lysosomal vesicle fusion 3 machinery by intracellular Salmonella 4 5 Alexander Kehl1,4, Vera Göser1, Tatjana Reuter1, Viktoria Liss1, Maximilian Franke1, 6 Christopher John1, Christian P. Richter2, Jörg Deiwick1 and Michael Hensel1, 7 8 1Division of Microbiology, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany; 2Division of Biophysics, University 9 of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany, 3CellNanOs – Center for Cellular Nanoanalytics, Fachbereich 10 Biologie/Chemie, Universität Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany; 4current address: Institute for Hygiene, 11 University of Münster, Münster, Germany 12 13 Running title: Host factors for SIF formation 14 Keywords: siRNA knockdown, live cell imaging, Salmonella-containing vacuole, Salmonella- 15 induced filaments 16 17 Address for correspondence: 18 Alexander Kehl 19 Institute for Hygiene 20 University of Münster 21 Robert-Koch-Str. 4148149 Münster, Germany 22 Tel.: +49(0)251/83-55233 23 E-mail: [email protected] 24 25 or bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/848549; this version posted November 19, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
    [Show full text]
  • CD4+ T Cells from Children with Active Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Show
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN CD4+ T cells from children with active juvenile idiopathic arthritis show altered chromatin features associated with transcriptional abnormalities Evan Tarbell1,3,5,7, Kaiyu Jiang2,7, Teresa R. Hennon2, Lucy Holmes2, Sonja Williams2, Yao Fu4, Patrick M. Gafney4, Tao Liu1,3,6 & James N. Jarvis2,3* Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is one of the most common chronic diseases in children. While clinical outcomes for patients with juvenile JIA have improved, the underlying biology of the disease and mechanisms underlying therapeutic response/non-response are poorly understood. We have shown that active JIA is associated with distinct transcriptional abnormalities, and that the attainment of remission is associated with reorganization of transcriptional networks. In this study, we used a multi- omics approach to identify mechanisms driving the transcriptional abnormalities in peripheral blood CD4+ T cells of children with active JIA. We demonstrate that active JIA is associated with alterations in CD4+ T cell chromatin, as assessed by ATACseq studies. However, 3D chromatin architecture, assessed by HiChIP and simultaneous mapping of CTCF anchors of chromatin loops, reveals that normal 3D chromatin architecture is largely preserved. Overlapping CTCF binding, ATACseq, and RNAseq data with known JIA genetic risk loci demonstrated the presence of genetic infuences on the observed transcriptional abnormalities and identifed candidate target genes. These studies demonstrate the utility of multi-omics approaches for unraveling important questions regarding the pathobiology of autoimmune diseases. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a broad term that describes a clinically heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by chronic synovial hypertrophy and infammation, with onset before 16 years of age 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Golgipathies in Neurodevelopment: a New View of Old Defects Sowmyalakshmi Rasika, Sandrine Passemard, Alain Verloes, Pierre Gressens, Vincent El Ghouzzi
    Golgipathies in Neurodevelopment: A New View of Old Defects Sowmyalakshmi Rasika, Sandrine Passemard, Alain Verloes, Pierre Gressens, Vincent El ghouzzi To cite this version: Sowmyalakshmi Rasika, Sandrine Passemard, Alain Verloes, Pierre Gressens, Vincent El ghouzzi. Golgipathies in Neurodevelopment: A New View of Old Defects. Developmental Neuroscience, Karger, 2019, 40 (5-6), pp.396-416. 10.1159/000497035. hal-02322665 HAL Id: hal-02322665 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02322665 Submitted on 2 Jun 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Rasika et al, Golgipathies and Neurodevelopment 1 2 Golgipathies in Neurodevelopment: 3 A New View of Old Defects 4 5 1,2 1,2 1,2 6 Sowmyalakshmi Rasika , Sandrine Passemard , Alain Verloes , Pierre 1,3 1* 7 Gressens , Vincent El Ghouzzi 8 9 1. PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France 10 2. AP HP, Hôpital Robert Debré, UF de Génétique Clinique, Paris, France 11 3. Centre for the Developing Brain, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical 12 Engineering, King’s College London, King’s Health Partners, St. Thomas’ Hospital, 13 London, United Kingdom 14 15 *Corresponding author: 16 Vincent El Ghouzzi 17 Address: Inserm U1141, Hôpital Robert-Debré, 48 Boulevard Sérurier, F-75019, 18 Paris, France.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Sorting Enables Comprehensive Characterization of Liver Zonation
    ARTICLES https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-019-0109-9 Spatial sorting enables comprehensive characterization of liver zonation Shani Ben-Moshe1,3, Yonatan Shapira1,3, Andreas E. Moor 1,2, Rita Manco1, Tamar Veg1, Keren Bahar Halpern1 and Shalev Itzkovitz 1* The mammalian liver is composed of repeating hexagonal units termed lobules. Spatially resolved single-cell transcriptomics has revealed that about half of hepatocyte genes are differentially expressed across the lobule, yet technical limitations have impeded reconstructing similar global spatial maps of other hepatocyte features. Here, we show how zonated surface markers can be used to sort hepatocytes from defined lobule zones with high spatial resolution. We apply transcriptomics, microRNA (miRNA) array measurements and mass spectrometry proteomics to reconstruct spatial atlases of multiple zon- ated features. We demonstrate that protein zonation largely overlaps with messenger RNA zonation, with the periportal HNF4α as an exception. We identify zonation of miRNAs, such as miR-122, and inverse zonation of miRNAs and their hepa- tocyte target genes, highlighting potential regulation of gene expression levels through zonated mRNA degradation. Among the targets, we find the pericentral Wingless-related integration site (Wnt) receptors Fzd7 and Fzd8 and the periportal Wnt inhibitors Tcf7l1 and Ctnnbip1. Our approach facilitates reconstructing spatial atlases of multiple cellular features in the liver and other structured tissues. he mammalian liver is a structured organ, consisting of measurements would broaden our understanding of the regulation repeating hexagonally shaped units termed ‘lobules’ (Fig. 1a). of liver zonation and could be used to model liver metabolic func- In mice, each lobule consists of around 9–12 concentric lay- tion more precisely.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Genetic Modifiers of TDP-43: Inflammatory Activation of Astrocytes for Neuroinflammation
    cells Article Identification of Genetic Modifiers of TDP-43: Inflammatory Activation of Astrocytes for Neuroinflammation Jae-Hong Kim 1,2,†, Md Habibur Rahman 1,2,3,†, Donghwi Park 1,‡, Myungjin Jo 1,§, Hyung-Jun Kim 4 and Kyoungho Suk 1,2,3,* 1 Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea; [email protected] (J.-H.K.); [email protected] (M.H.R.); [email protected] (D.P.); [email protected] (M.J.) 2 BK21 Plus KNU Biomedical Convergence Program, Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 412944, Korea 3 Brain Science & Engineering Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea 4 Dementia Research Group, Korea Brain Research Institute (KBRI), Daegu 41062, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-53-420-4835 † These authors contributed equally to this work. ‡ Current address: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan 44033, Korea. § Current address: Korea Brain Research Institute, Daegu 41062, Korea. Abstract: Transactive response DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) is a ubiquitously expressed DNA/RNA-binding protein linked to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal demen- tia (FTD). TDP-43 has been implicated in numerous aspects of the mRNA life cycle, as well as in cell toxicity and neuroinflammation. In this study, we used the toxicity of the TDP-43 expression in Sac- charomyces cerevisiae as an assay to identify TDP-43 genetic interactions. Specifically, we transformed human TDP-43 cDNAs of wild-type or disease-associated mutants (M337V and Q331K) en masse into Citation: Kim, J.-H.; Rahman, M.H.; Park, D.; Jo, M.; Kim, H.-J.; Suk, K.
    [Show full text]
  • Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome Genereview – Molecular Genetics
    Title: Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome GeneReview – Molecular Genetics: Gene Symbol Aliases and Less Common Genes Authors: Huizing M, Malicdan MCV, Gochuico BR, Gahl WA Updated: October 2017 Note: The following information is provided by the authors and has not been reviewed by GeneReviews staff. Gene Symbols and Gene Symbol Aliases for Genetic Causes of Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome Gene Symbol 1 Gene Symbol Aliases 2 AP3B1 ADTB3, HPS2 AP3D1 HPS10, ADTD BLOC1S3 HPS8, RP, BLOS3 BLOC1S6 HPS9, PLDN, BLOS6 DTNBP1 BLOC1S8, HPS7 HPS1 BLOC3S1, HPS HPS3 BLOC2S1 HPS4 BLOC3S2 HPS5 BLOC2S2 HPS6 BLOC2S3 1. HGNC-approved gene symbols (listed alphabetically) 2. Gene symbol aliases are unapproved nomenclature that may be used in older literature; some are listed at the HGNC. Less Common Genetic Causes of Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome AP3D1 Gene structure. The longest AP3D1 mRNA transcript variant (NM_001261826) consists of 32 exons and has an open reading frame of 3648 bp. For a detailed summary of gene and protein information, see Table A, Gene. See above for gene symbol aliases. Pathogenic variants. As of July 2017, only one pathogenic variant c.3565_3566delGT (p.Val1189Leufs*8) has been reported in a Turkish boy [Ammann et al 2016]. Normal gene product. The product of AP3D1 is the 1215-amino acid (~136.7 kd) protein AP3D1 (AP-3 δ), which is a subunit of adaptor complex-3 (AP-3) [Dell’Angelica et al 1999, Ammann et al 2016]. AP-3 is a heterotetrameric coat protein complex that forms intracellular vesicles (presumably lysosomes and lysosome-related organelles, including melanosomes, dense bodies, and lytic granules) from the trans-Golgi network and endosomes in a clathrin-mediated fashion.
    [Show full text]