DOCSLIB.ORG

Pinus Mugo) Na Biotopovou a Druhovou Diverzitu Arkto-Alpinské Tundry Ve Východních Sudetech (CHKO Jeseníky, NPR Králický Sněžník)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pinus Mugo) Na Biotopovou a Druhovou Diverzitu Arkto-Alpinské Tundry Ve Východních Sudetech (CHKO Jeseníky, NPR Králický Sněžník) VaV SM/6/70/05 Vliv výsadeb borovice kleče (Pinus mugo) na biotopovou a druhovou diverzitu arkto-alpinské tundry ve Východních Sudetech (CHKO Jeseníky, NPR Králický Sněžník). Návrh managementu těchto porostů Zpráva o řešení projektu za rok 2006 Řešitel: RNDr. Jan Hošek, Hořovice Spolupracovníci: Marek Banaš Karolína Černá Radim Hédl Jakub Houška Josef Kašák Martin Kočí Marek Křížek Tomáš Kuras Tomáš Kyncl Zdeněk Majkus Martina Lešková Jan Novák Libor Petr Martin Růžička Jiří Souček Jiří Stanovský Václav Treml Ivan H. Tuf Jan Wild Miroslav Zeidler Obsah 1. Úvod .......................................................................................................................6 2. Paleoekologická analýza profilů Mezikotlí a Keprník (L. Petr, V. Treml) ............8 2.1. Úvod............................................................................................................ 8 2.2. Metody ........................................................................................................ 9 Pylová analýza ..................................................................................................... 9 Interpretace vývoje polohy alpinské hranice lesa .............................................. 10 2.3. Výsledky ................................................................................................... 10 Mezikotlí............................................................................................................ 10 Keprník .............................................................................................................. 11 2.4. Diskuse...................................................................................................... 12 Rozsah alpinského bezlesí ................................................................................. 12 Otázka přirozené absence borovice kleče.......................................................... 13 2.5. Závěr ......................................................................................................... 14 2.6. Literatura................................................................................................... 14 3. Analýza pedologických dokladů o rozsahu alpinského bezlesí (R. Hédl, J. Houška, J. Novák)...........................................................................................................16 3.1. Úvod.......................................................................................................... 16 3.2. Cíle a principy........................................................................................... 17 Pedologie ........................................................................................................... 17 Anthrakologie .................................................................................................... 18 3.3. Metodika ................................................................................................... 18 Výškové transekty.............................................................................................. 18 Pedologie ........................................................................................................... 20 Anthrakologie .................................................................................................... 21 3.4. Výsledky ................................................................................................... 21 Pedologie ........................................................................................................... 21 Anthrakologie .................................................................................................... 21 3.5. Literatura................................................................................................... 22 Transekt Praděd ................................................................................................. 23 Transekt Vysoká Hole ....................................................................................... 24 Transekt Kamzičník........................................................................................... 26 4. Teplotní poměry alpinské hranice lesa v Hrubém Jeseníku (V. Treml) ...............28 4.1. Úvod.......................................................................................................... 28 4.2. Metody ...................................................................................................... 29 Stanovení závislosti polohy alpinské hranice lesa na potenciálním tepelném požitku stanoviště.................................................................................................... 29 Přímá měření teplotních charakteristik alpinské hranice lesa............................ 30 Možné chyby měření půdních teplot.................................................................. 31 4.3. Výsledky ................................................................................................... 32 Vztah polohy hranice lesa a potenciálního tepelného požitku stanoviště.......... 32 Teplotní charakteristika ekotonu alpinské hranice lesa - vztah měřených hodnot s růstovými charakteristikami smrku, potenciálním tepelným požitkem stanoviště a pozicí v ekotonu...................................................................................................... 33 Teploty ve vegetačním období........................................................................... 36 4.4. Diskuse...................................................................................................... 36 4.5. Závěr ......................................................................................................... 38 2 4.6. Literatura................................................................................................... 39 5. Hodnocení růstových parametrů smrkových skupin nad alpinskou hranicí lesa (T. Kyncl) ................................................................................................................41 5.1. Úvod.......................................................................................................... 41 5.2. Materiál a metodika................................................................................... 41 5.3. Výsledky ................................................................................................... 43 5.4. Diskuse...................................................................................................... 45 5.5. Literatura................................................................................................... 45 6. Vývoj plošného rozšíření klečových porostů – analýza leteckých snímků (J. Wild) ..............................................................................................................................47 6.1. Úvod.......................................................................................................... 47 6.2. Metodika ................................................................................................... 48 Klasifikace snímků ............................................................................................ 48 Černobílé snímky............................................................................................... 48 Barevné snímky ................................................................................................. 49 Vyhodnocení změn v čase ................................................................................. 49 Přesnost klasifikace............................................................................................ 49 6.3. Výsledky ................................................................................................... 50 Aktuální zastoupení klečových porostů............................................................. 50 Změny v čase ..................................................................................................... 50 Přesnost klasifikace............................................................................................ 50 6.4. Literatura................................................................................................... 51 7. Hodnocení růstové rychlosti klečových porostů (T. Kyncl) ................................59 7.1. Úvod.......................................................................................................... 59 7.2. Metodika ................................................................................................... 60 7.3. Výsledky a diskuse.................................................................................... 61 7.4. Závěr ......................................................................................................... 61 7.5. Literatura................................................................................................... 61 8. Zdravotní stav porostů kleče (J. Souček) .............................................................64 8.1. Úvod.......................................................................................................... 64 8.2. Metodika sledování zdravotního stavu...................................................... 64 8.3. Výsledky ................................................................................................... 65 8.4. Diskuse...................................................................................................... 67 8.5. Závěr ......................................................................................................... 67 8.6. Literatura..................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tutela ZBORNÍK SLOVENSKÉHO MÚZEA OCHRANY PRÍRODY a JASKY N I a RST VA V LIPTOVSKOM MIKULÁŠI 11
    tutela ZBORNÍK SLOVENSKÉHO MÚZEA OCHRANY PRÍRODY A JASKY N I A RST VA V LIPTOVSKOM MIKULÁŠI 11 NATURAE 2007 1 O B S A H V E D E C K É Š T Ú D I E Jozef Šteffek – Patrícia Danková: Ekologické a ekosozologické vyhodnotenia tanatocenóz malakofauny z náplavov tokov Spišskej Magury ..................................................................... 5 Oto Majzlan: Chrobáky (Coleoptera) Šenkvického a Martinského lesa pri Senci .......... 27 Oto Majzlan: Letová aktivita nosáčikov (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) v NPR Bábsky Predseda redakčnej rady: les pri Nitre .................................................................................................................................... 43 doc. RNDr. Dana Šubová, CSc. Vladimír Straka – Oto Majzlan: Dvojkrídlovce (Diptera) troch lokalít v Chránenej krajinnej oblasti Strážovské vrchy .............................................................................................. 47 Michal Wiezik: Mravce (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) horských a vysokohorských biotopov južnej časti Kráľovohoľských Tatier ............................................................................................ 85 Redakčná rada: Jozef Školek: Sutinové spoločenstvá v NPR Mních ................................................................. 91 prof. RNDr. Peter Bitušík, CSc., RNDr. Miroslav Fulín, CSc., RNDr. Ľudovít Gaál, Stanislav Korenko: Pavúky (Arachnida, Araneae) východnej časti Kozích chrbtov .......... 103 prof. RNDr. Oto Majzlan, PhD., doc. RNDr. Ľubomír Panigaj, CSc., RNDr. Jozef Monika Hatinová – Kristina
    [Show full text]
  • Wide-Ranging Barcoding Aids Discovery of One-Third Increase Of
    OPEN Wide-ranging barcoding aids discovery SUBJECT AREAS: of one-third increase of species richness TAXONOMY SYSTEMATICS in presumably well-investigated moths MOLECULAR EVOLUTION Marko Mutanen1, Lauri Kaila2 & Jukka Tabell3 PHYLOGENETICS 1Biodiversity Unit, Department of Biology, PO Box 3000, University of Oulu, Finland, 2Finnish Museum of Natural History, Zoology 3 Received Unit, PO Box 17, University of Helsinki, Finland, Laaksotie 28, FI-19600 Hartola, Finland. 3 July 2013 Accepted Rapid development of broad regional and international DNA barcode libraries have brought new insights 19 September 2013 into the species diversity of many areas and groups. Many new species, even within well-investigated species groups, have been discovered based initially on differences in DNA barcodes. We barcoded 437 collection Published specimens belonging to 40 pre-identified Palearctic species of the Elachista bifasciella group of moths 9 October 2013 (Lepidoptera, Elachistidae). Although the study group has been a subject of several careful morphological taxonomic examinations, an unexpectedly high number of previously undetected putative species is revealed, resulting in a 34% rise in species number in the study area. The validity of putative new species was subsequently supported with diagnostic morphological traits. We show that DNA barcodes provide a Correspondence and powerful method of detecting potential new species even in taxonomic groups and geographic areas that requests for materials have previously been under considerable morphological taxonomic scrutiny. should be addressed to M.M. (marko. [email protected]) stimates of the number of species on Earth vary from 3 to 100 million, the most recent survey concluding that there are about 8.7 million (61.3 million SE) species based on a quantitative extrapolation of current taxonomic knowledge1.
    [Show full text]
  • List of the Specimens of the British Animals in the Collection of The
    LIST SPECIMENS BRITISH ANIMALS THE COLLECTION BRITISH MUSEUM '^r- 7 : • ^^ PART XVL — LEPIDOPTERA (completed), 9i>M PRINTED BY ORDER OF THE TRUSTEES. LONDON, 1854. -4 ,<6 < LONDON : PRINTED BY EDWARD NEWMAN, 9, DEVONSHIRE ST., BISHOPSGATE. INTRODUCTION. The principal object of the present Catalogue has been to give a complete Hst of all the smaller Lepidopterous Insects that have been recorded as found in Great Britain, indicating at the same time those species that are contained in the Collection. This Catalogue has been prepared by H. T. STAiNTON^ sq., so well known for his works on British Micro-Lepidoptera, for the extent of his cabinet, and the hberahtj with which he allows it to be consulted. Mr. Stainton has endeavom-ed to arrange these insects ac- cording to theh natural affinities, so far as is practicable with a local collection ; and has taken great pains to ascertain every name which has been applied to the respective species and their varieties, the author of the same, and the date of pubhcation ; the references to such names as are unaccompanied by descrip- tions being included in parentheses : all are arranged chronolo- gically, excepting those to the illustrations and to the figures which invariably follow their authorities. The species in the British Museum Collection are indicated by the letters B. M., annexed. JOHN EDWARD GRAY. British Museum, May 2Qrd, 1854. CATALOGUE BRITISH MICRO-LEPIDOPTERA § III. Order LEPIDOPTERA. (§ MICKO-LEPIDOPTERA). Sub-Div. TINEINA. Tineina, Sta. I. B. Lep. Tin. p. 7, 1854. Tineacea, Zell. Isis, 1839, p. 180. YponomeutidaB et Tineidae, p., Step. H. iv.
    [Show full text]
  • Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An
    Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE IRISH BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA) WITH A CONCISE CHECKLIST OF IRISH SPECIES AND ELACHISTA BIATOMELLA (STAINTON, 1848) NEW TO IRELAND K. G. M. Bond1 and J. P. O’Connor2 1Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, School of BEES, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. e-mail: <[email protected]> 2Emeritus Entomologist, National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Abstract Additions, deletions and corrections are made to the Irish checklist of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera). Elachista biatomella (Stainton, 1848) is added to the Irish list. The total number of confirmed Irish species of Lepidoptera now stands at 1480. Key words: Lepidoptera, additions, deletions, corrections, Irish list, Elachista biatomella Introduction Bond, Nash and O’Connor (2006) provided a checklist of the Irish Lepidoptera. Since its publication, many new discoveries have been made and are reported here. In addition, several deletions have been made. A concise and updated checklist is provided. The following abbreviations are used in the text: BM(NH) – The Natural History Museum, London; NMINH – National Museum of Ireland, Natural History, Dublin. The total number of confirmed Irish species now stands at 1480, an addition of 68 since Bond et al. (2006). Taxonomic arrangement As a result of recent systematic research, it has been necessary to replace the arrangement familiar to British and Irish Lepidopterists by the Fauna Europaea [FE] system used by Karsholt 60 Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) and Razowski, which is widely used in continental Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Travaux Scientifiques Du Parc National De La Vanoise : BUVAT (R.), 1972
    ISSN 0180-961 X a Vanoise .'.Parc National du de la Recueillis et publiés sous la direction de Emmanuel de GUILLEBON Directeur du Parc national et Ch. DEGRANGE Professeur honoraire à l'Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble Ministère de l'Environnement Direction de la Nature et des Paysages Cahiers du Parc National de la Vanoise 135 rue du Docteur Julliand Boîte Postale 706 F-73007 Chambéry cedex ISSN 0180-961 X © Parc national de la Vanoise, Chambéry, France, 1995 SOMMAIRE COMPOSITION DU COMITÉ SCIENTIFIQUE ........................................................................................................ 5 LECTURE CRITIQUE DES ARTICLES .......................................................................................................................... 6 LISTE DES COLLABORATEURS DU VOLUME ..................................................................................................... 6 EN HOMMAGE : ]V[arius HUDRY (1915-1994) ........................................................................................... 7 CONTRIBUTIONS SCIENTIFIQUES M. HUDRY (+). - Vanoise : son étymologie .................................................................................. 8 J. DEBELMAS et J.-P. EAMPNOUX. - Notice explicative de la carte géolo- gique simplifiée du Parc national de la Vanoise et de sa zone périphé- rique (Savoie) ......................................................................................................,.........................................^^ 16 G. NlCOUD, S. FUDRAL, L. JUIF et J.-P. RAMPNOUX. - Hydrogéologie
    [Show full text]
  • The Entomologist's Record and Journal of Variation
    M DC, — _ CO ^. E CO iliSNrNVINOSHilWS' S3ldVyan~LIBRARlES*"SMITHS0N!AN~lNSTITUTl0N N' oCO z to Z (/>*Z COZ ^RIES SMITHSONIAN_INSTITUTlON NOIiniIiSNI_NVINOSHllWS S3ldVaan_L: iiiSNi'^NviNOSHiiNS S3iavyan libraries Smithsonian institution N( — > Z r- 2 r" Z 2to LI ^R I ES^'SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTlON'"NOIini!iSNI~NVINOSHilVMS' S3 I b VM 8 11 w </» z z z n g ^^ liiiSNi NviNOSHims S3iyvyan libraries Smithsonian institution N' 2><^ =: to =: t/J t/i </> Z _J Z -I ARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIiniliSNI NVINOSHilWS SSIdVyan L — — </> — to >'. ± CO uiiSNi NViNosHiiws S3iyvaan libraries Smithsonian institution n CO <fi Z "ZL ~,f. 2 .V ^ oCO 0r Vo^^c>/ - -^^r- - 2 ^ > ^^^^— i ^ > CO z to * z to * z ARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIinillSNl NVINOSHllWS S3iaVdan L to 2 ^ '^ ^ z "^ O v.- - NiOmst^liS^> Q Z * -J Z I ID DAD I re CH^ITUCnMIAM IMOTtTIITinM / c. — t" — (/) \ Z fj. Nl NVINOSHIIINS S3 I M Vd I 8 H L B R AR I ES, SMITHSONlAN~INSTITUTION NOIlfl :S^SMITHS0NIAN_ INSTITUTION N0liniliSNI__NIVIN0SHillMs'^S3 I 8 VM 8 nf LI B R, ^Jl"!NVINOSHimS^S3iavyan"'LIBRARIES^SMITHS0NIAN~'lNSTITUTI0N^NOIin L '~^' ^ [I ^ d 2 OJ .^ . ° /<SS^ CD /<dSi^ 2 .^^^. ro /l^2l^!^ 2 /<^ > ^'^^ ^ ..... ^ - m x^^osvAVix ^' m S SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — NOIlfliliSNrNVINOSHimS^SS iyvyan~LIBR/ S "^ ^ ^ c/> z 2 O _ Xto Iz JI_NVIN0SH1I1/MS^S3 I a Vd a n^LI B RAR I ES'^SMITHSONIAN JNSTITUTION "^NOlin Z -I 2 _j 2 _j S SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIinillSNI NVINOSHilWS S3iyVaan LI BR/ 2: r- — 2 r- z NVINOSHiltNS ^1 S3 I MVy I 8 n~L B R AR I Es'^SMITHSONIAN'iNSTITUTIOn'^ NOlin ^^^>^ CO z w • z i ^^ > ^ s smithsonian_institution NoiiniiiSNi to NviNosHiiws'^ss I dVH a n^Li br; <n / .* -5^ \^A DO « ^\t PUBLISHED BI-MONTHLY ENTOMOLOGIST'S RECORD AND Journal of Variation Edited by P.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Gracillariinae Und Phyllocnistinae (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) Des Bundeslandes Salzburg, Österreich
    ©Österr. Ges. f. Entomofaunistik, Wien, download unter www.zobodat.at Beiträge zur Entomofaunistik 15: 1 –7 Wien, Dezember 2014 Die Gracillariinae und Phyllocnistinae (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) des Bundeslandes Salzburg, Österreich Michael KURZ* & Gernot EMBACHER** Abstract The Gracillariinae and Phyllocnistinae (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) of the federal state of Salzburg, Austria. – The revision of all specimens housed in the collection “Haus der Natur” and in several private collections, as well as available literature records of the family Gracillari- idae (excluding Lithocolletinae) of the federal territority of Salzburg revealed 33 species, 29 of which belong to Gracillariinae and four to Phyllocnistinae. Four species recorded by EMBACHER & al. (2011b) and also by HUEMER (2013) had to be eliminated from the catalogue because the speci- mens were misidentified or the records could not be verified. Two species are new for the fauna: Caloptilia populetorum (ZELLER, 1839) and Caloptilia fidella (REUTTI, 1853). Key words: Austria, Salzburg, Lepidoptera, Gracillariidae, Gracillariinae, Phyllocnistinae, faunis- tic records, collection “Haus der Natur”. Zusammenfassung Die Revision der in der Sammlung am „Haus der Natur“ und in mehreren Privatsammlungen auf- gefundenen Belege aus der Familie Gracillariidae (ausgenommen Lithocolletinae) und der dazu bekannten Literaturangaben ergab den Nachweis von 33 Arten, von denen 29 den Gracillariinae und 4 den Phyllocnistinae zuzuordnen sind. Vier in EMBACHER & al. (2011b) und auch in HUEMER (2013)
    [Show full text]
  • Entomologiske Meddelelser
    Entomologiske Meddelelser BIND 59 KØBENHAVN 1991 Indhold - Contents Buh!, 0., P. Falck, B. Jørgensen, O. Karshol t, K. Larsen & K. Schnack: Fund af små• sommerfugle fra Danmark i 1989 (Lepidoptera) Records of Microlepidopterafrom Denmark in 1989 . 29 Fjellberg, A.: Proisotoma roberti n.sp. from Greenland, and redescription of P ripicola Linnaniemi, 1912 (Collembola, lsotomidae)................................ 81 Godske, L.: Aphids in nests of Lasius Jlavus F. in Denmark. 1: Faunistic description. (Aphidoidea, Anoeciidae & Pemphigidae; Hymenoptera, Formicidae) . 85 Hallas, T. E., M. Iversen, J Korsgaard & R. Dahl: Number of mi tes in stored grain, straw and hay related to the age ofthe substrate (Acari) . 57 Hansen, M. &J Pedersen: >>Hvad finder jeg i køkkenet«- en ny dansk skimmelbille, Adisternia watsoni (Wollaston) (Coleoptera, Latridiidae) A new Danish latridiid, Adisternia watsoni Wollaston. 23 Hansen, M., P. Jørum, V. Mahler & O. Vagtholm:Jensen: Niende tillæg til >>Forteg­ nelse over Danmarks biller« (Coleoptera) Ninth supplement to the list oj Danish Coleoptera . 5 Hansen, M. & S. Kristensen: To nye danske biller af slægten Monotoma Herbst (Cole­ optera, Monotomidae) Two new Danish beetles of the genus Monotoma Herbst . 41 Hansen, M., S. Kristensen, V. Mahler & J Pedersen: Tiende tillæg til >>Fortegnelse over Danmarks biller<< (Coleoptera) Tenth supplement to the list of Danish Coleoptera . 99 Heie, O. E.: Addition of fourteen species to the list of Danish aphids (Homoptera, Aphidoidea) . 51 Holmen, M.: Dværgvandnymfe, Nehalennia speciosa (Charpentier) ny for Danmark (Odonata, Coenagrionidae) The damselfly Nehalennia speciosa (Charpentier, 1840) new to Denmark ........... Nielsen, B. Overgaard: Seasonal development of the woodland earwig (Chelidurella acanthopygia Gene) in Denmark (Dermaptera) . 91 Pape, T.: Færøsk dermatobiose (Diptera, Oestridae, Cuterebrinae) - med en over- sigt over human myiasis i Danmark .
    [Show full text]
  • Univerzita Palackého V Olomouci PÍrodov Decká Fakulta Katedra Zoologie a Ornitologická Laborato 
    UNIVERZITA PALACKÉHO V OLOMOUCI PÍRODOV DECKÁ FAKULTA KATEDRA ZOOLOGIE A ORNITOLOGICKÁ LABORATO Význam a ochrana bezlesí Hrubého Jeseníku z hlediska biodiverzity brouk (Coleoptera) DOKTORSKÁ DISERTA NÍ PRÁCE Josef Kašák Vedoucí práce: doc. RNDr. Jaroslav Starý, Ph.D. Konzultant: RNDr. Tomáš Kuras, Ph.D. Olomouc 2015 Bibliografická identifikace: Jméno a p íjmení autora: Josef Kašák Název práce: Význam a ochrana bezlesí Hrubého Jeseníku z hlediska biodiverzity brouk (Coleoptera) Typ práce: doktorská diserta ní práce Pracovišt : Katedra zoologie a ornitologická laborato , P írodov decká fakulta, Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci Vedoucí práce: doc. RNDr. Jaroslav Starý, Ph.D. Konzultant: RNDr. Tomáš Kuras, Ph.D. Studijní program: P1527 Biologie Studijní obor: Zoologie Rok obhajoby práce: 2015 Abstrakt: Biodiverzita jako variabilita života poskytuje lidské spole nosti adu nezbytných zdroj , ekosystémových služeb a p edstavuje také významnou kulturní hodnotu. Na druhé stran však dochází sou asn k jejímu ochuzování v souvislosti s rozvojem lidské spole nosti. Z pohledu ochrany p írody se proto horské ekosystémy adí mezi jedno z nejcenn jších a nejohrožen jších prost edí v globálním m ítku. V rámci p edložené doktorské práce byly studovány vybrané potenciáln významné antropické vlivy na biodiverzitu horských bezlesí Hrubého Jeseníku prost ednictvím modelové bioindika ní skupiny brouk (Coleoptera). V prostoru primárního bezlesí arkto- alpinní tundry byl studován vliv sjezdových tratí a invazivní d eviny borovice kle e ( Pinus mugo ) na spole enstva brouk . Na území sekundárních bezlesí podhorských luk a pastvin byl hodnocen vliv zem dlského hospoda ení na brouky a další bezobratlé. Studium vlivu lyža ského areálu prokázalo, že p estože jsou sjezdové trat v alpínské zón zájmového území provozovány zp sobem šetrným k vegetaci, tak pr kazn m ní pvodní spole enstva epigeických brouk .
    [Show full text]
  • E-News Spring 2019
    Spring e-newsletter March 2019 Welcome to Spring! Green Hairstreak - Iain Leach Orange-tip - Iain Leach Garden Tiger caterpillar - Roy Leverton INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Contributions to our newsletters Dates for your Diary……………………….2 The Wish List…………………….…13-14 are always welcome. Borders News...........................................3 Our Conservation Strategy…….….15-20 Please use the contact details Munching Caterpillars Scotland.…………4 Carrion Beetles…………….……….21-22 below to get in touch! Peatlands for People………..…………….5 Moth Equipment - for sale...............23 If you do not wish to receive our Recording butterflies using Apps………...6 SW Branch Events 2019……….....24-25 newsletter in the future, simply Adopt a Transect………………………......7 Highland Branch Events 2019..….26-29 reply to this message with the Rare migrant on Islay!..............................8 East Branch Events 2019..….…...30-34 word ’unsubscribe’ in the title - Coul Links Update……………………….9-10 thank you. Northern Brown Argus, Kincraig………11-12 Contact Details: Butterfly Conservation Scotland t: 01786 447753 Balallan House e: [email protected] Allan Park w: www.butterfly-conservation.org/scotland Stirling FK8 2QG Dates for your Diary Wildlife Recorders’ Gathering - Saturday 30th March 10.30 - 4.30pm - Dumfries An informal day of talks, presentations, networking and displays covering the wonderful wildlife of SW Scotland. Contact SWSEIC at [email protected] for more details. Highland Branch AGM - Saturday, 13th April 2019 Our Highlands & Island Branch will be holding their AGM on Saturday, 13th April at the Kingsview Christian Centre, Balnafettack Road, Inverness, IV3 8TF. See Highland Branch Events (Page 27) for more info. South & West Branch Members’ Day/AGM - Saturday, 27th April 2019 Our Glasgow & Southwest Branch will be holding their Members’ Day/AGM on Saturday, 27th April at Chatelherault Country Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhigognostis Scharnikensis Sp. N., Eine Morphologisch Und Genetisch Differenzierte Neue Schmetterlingsart Aus Den Hohen Tauern (Lepidoptera, Plutellidae)
    ©Naturwissenschaftlicher Verein für Kärnten, Austria, download unter www.zobodat.at Carinthia II n 204./124. Jahrgang n Seiten 443–454 n Klagenfurt 2014 443 Rhigognostis scharnikensis sp. n., eine morphologisch und genetisch differenzierte neue Schmetterlingsart aus den Hohen Tauern (Lepidoptera, Plutellidae) Von Peter HUEMER, Christian WIESER & Marko MUTANEN Zusammenfassung Rhigognostis scharnikensis Huemer & Wieser, sp. n. wird aus der Kreuzeck­ gruppe (Irschen, Hohe Tauern, Kärnten) beschrieben und sowohl Falter als auch Genitalstrukturen beider Geschlechter werden abgebildet. Die neue Art steht genitalmorphologisch und im DNA Barcode R. senilella (Zetterstedt, 1839) am nächs­ ten, weist aber eine Reihe von diagnostischen morphologischen Merkmalen auf und eine genetische Distanz von 5,78 % zum nächsten Nachbarn. Als weitere ähnliche Art wird R. annulatella (Curtis, 1832) abgebildet und verglichen. Weiteres wird R. schmaltzella (Zetterstedt, 1839) erstmals für Italien gemeldet. Abstract Rhigognostis scharnikensis Huemer & Wieser, sp. n. is described from the Kreuzeck­group (Irschen, Hohe Tauern, Carinthia, Austria) and adult and genital structures of both sexes are figured. The new species is most similar to R. senilella (Zetterstedt, 1839) in the genitalia and in the DNA barcode. However, it differs in seve­ ral diagnostic morphological characters and in a barcode divergence of 5.78% to the nearest neighbour. As a further similar species R. annulatella (Curtis, 1832) is figured and compared. Moreover, R. schmaltzella (Zetterstedt, 1839) is firstly recorded for Italy. E i n l e i t u n g Die Schmetterlingsfauna Kärntens im Allgemeinen und jene der Ho- hen Tauern im Besonderen gelten durch intensive Bestrebungen der letz- ten 20 Jahre inzwischen als relativ gut erfasst (HUEMER & WIESER 2008, WIESER 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • PLANTER TIL MINIVÅDOMRÅDER Videnskabelig Rapport Fra DCE – Nationalt Center for Miljø Og Energi Nr
    PLANTER TIL MINIVÅDOMRÅDER Videnskabelig rapport fra DCE – Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi nr. 334 2019 AARHUS AU UNIVERSITET DCE – NATIONALT CENTER FOR MILJØ OG ENERGI [Tom side] PLANTER TIL MINIVÅDOMRÅDER Videnskabelig rapport fra DCE – Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi nr. 334 2019 Beate Strandberg Annica Olesen Kirstine Thiemer Lars Skipper Kevin Kuhlmann Clausen Niels Kanstrup Tenna Riis Aarhus Universitet, Institut for Bioscience AARHUS AU UNIVERSITET DCE – NATIONALT CENTER FOR MILJØ OG ENERGI Datablad Serietitel og nummer: Videnskabelig rapport fra DCE - Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi nr. 334 Titel: Planter til minivådområder Forfattere: Beate Strandberg, Annica Olesen, Kirstine Thiemer, Lars Skipper, Kevin Kuhlmann Clausen, Niels Kanstrup & Tenna Riis Institution: Aarhus Universitet, Institut for Bioscience Udgiver: Aarhus Universitet, DCE – Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi © URL: http://dce.au.dk Udgivelsesår: September 2019 Redaktion afsluttet: Juli 2019 Faglig kommentering: Carl Christian Hoffmann og Torben Linding Lauridsen Kvalitetssikring, DCE: Signe Jung-Madsen Finansiel støtte: Grønt Udviklings- og DemonstrationsProgram (GUDP), Landbrugsstyrelsen Bedes citeret: Strandberg, B., Olesen, A., Thiemer, K., Skipper, L., Clausen, K.K., Kanstrup, N. & Riis, T. 2019. Planter til minivådområder. Aarhus Universitet, DCE – Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi, 138 s. - Videnskabelig rapport nr. 334 http://dce2.au.dk/pub/SR334.pdf Gengivelse tilladt med tydelig kildeangivelse Sammenfatning: Ved etablering af bl.a. minivådområder anbefales at de lavvande dele af anlæggene beplantes. Sædvanligvis benyttes meget få plantearter, primært tagrør, til beplantningen. Ud over tagrør er der en del andre planter, som kan benyttes til beplantningen. Plantekataloget præsenterer 82 plantearter, der alle vil kunne benyttes. I præsentationen af arterne er hovedvægten lagt på den primære opgave, som planterne skal bidrage til, nemlig næringsstoffjernelse, men en del andre økosystemfunktioner, som planterne kan bidrage til, er også medtaget.
    [Show full text]