AMR 34/063/2003 EXTRA 48/03 Fear for Safety
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Economics Working Paper 99-04. Adoption and Use of Improved
E C O N O M I C S Working Paper 99-04 Adoption and Use of Improved Maize by Small-Scale Farmers in Southeast Guatemala Gustavo Saín and Julio Martínez* * Gustavo Saín is Regional Economist for Central America and the Caribbean with CIMMYT. Julio Martínez is an economist with the Instituto de Ciencias y Tecnologías Agropecuarias (ICTA) de Guatemala. The views represented in this paper are those of the authors and do not represent the official views of CIMMYT. CIMMYT (www.cimmyt.mx or www.cimmyt.cgiar.org) is an internationally funded, nonprofit scientific research and training organization. Headquartered in Mexico, the Center works with agricultural research institutions worldwide to improve the productivity, profitability, and sustainability of maize and wheat systems for poor farmers in developing countries. It is one of 16 similar centers supported by the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). The CGIAR comprises over 55 partner countries, international and regional organizations, and private foundations. It is co-sponsored by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (World Bank), the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Financial support for CIMMYT’s research agenda also comes from many other sources, including foundations, development banks, and public and private agencies. CIMMYT supports Future Harvest, a public awareness campaign that builds understanding about the importance of agricultural issues and international agricultural research. Future Harvest links respected research institutions, influential public figures, and leading agricultural scientists to underscore the wider social benefits of improved agriculture—peace, prosperity, environmental renewal, health, and the alleviation of human suffering (www.futureharvest.org). -
Guatemala Page 1 of 14
Guatemala Page 1 of 14 Guatemala Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2006 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 6, 2007 Guatemala is a democratic, multiparty republic with a population of approximately 12.7 million. In 2003 national elections, generally considered by international observers to be free and fair, Oscar Berger of the Grand National Alliance coalition (GANA) won a four-year term, which began in January 2004. While the civilian authorities generally maintained control of the security forces, there were instances in which members of the security forces committed illegal acts including human rights abuses. Although the government generally respected the human rights of its citizens, serious problems remained. The human rights and societal problems included the government's failure to investigate and punish unlawful killings committed by members of the security forces; widespread societal violence, including numerous killings; corruption and substantial inadequacies in the police and judicial sectors; police involvement in kidnappings; impunity for criminal activity; harsh and dangerous prison conditions; arbitrary arrest and detention; failure of the judicial system to ensure full and timely investigation, or fair trials; failure to protect judicial sector officials, witnesses, and civil society organizations from intimidation; discrimination and violence against women; discrimination and violence against gay, transvestite, and transgender persons, trafficking in persons; ethnic discrimination; and ineffective enforcement of labor laws, including child labor provisions. RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Section 1 Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom From: a. Arbitrary or Unlawful Deprivation of Life Although there were no reports that the government or its agents committed any politically motivated killings, members of the police force committed a number of unlawful killings. -
Infected Areas As at 11 May 1995 Zones Infectées Au 11 Mai 1995
WEEKLY EPIDEMIOLOGICAL RECORD, Ho. It, 12 MAY 1995 • RELEVÉ ÉPIDÉMIOLOGIQUE HEBDOMADAIRE, N‘ H , 12 MAI 1995 M adagascar (4 May 1995).1 The number of influenza M adagascar (4 mai 1995).1 Le nombre d’isolements de virus A(H3N2) virus isolates increased during February and grippaux A(H3N2) s’est accru en février et en mars. Un accrois March. At that time there was a noticeable increase in sement marqué des syndromes grippaux a alors été observé parmi influenza-like illness among the general population in la population générale à Antananarivo. Des virus grippaux Antananarivo. Influenza A(H3N2) viruses continued to be A(H3N2) ont continué à être isolés en avril, de même que quel isolated in April along with a few of H1N1 subtype. ques virus appartenant au sous-type H1N1. Norway (3 May 1995).2 The notifications of influenza-like Norvège (3 mai 1995).2 Les notifications de syndrome grippal ont illness reached a peak in the last week of March and had atteint un pic la dernière semaine de mars et sont retombées à 89 declined to 89 per 100 000 population in the week ending pour 100 000 habitants au cours de la semaine qui s’est achevée le 23 April. At that time, 7 counties, mainly in the south-east 23 avril. Sept comtés, principalement dans le sud-est et l’ouest du and the west, reported incidence rates above 100 per pays, signalaient alors des taux d ’incidence dépassant 100 pour 100 000 and in the following week, 4 counties reported 100 000, et la semaine suivante 4 comtés ont déclaré des taux au- rates above 100. -
WEEKLY EPIDEMIOLOGICAL RECORD RELEVE EPIDEMIOLOGIQUE HEBDOMADAIRE 15 SEPTEMBER 1995 ● 70Th YEAR 70E ANNÉE ● 15 SEPTEMBRE 1995
WEEKLY EPIDEMIOLOGICAL RECORD, No. 37, 15 SEPTEMBER 1995 • RELEVÉ ÉPIDÉMIOLOGIQUE HEBDOMADAIRE, No 37, 15 SEPTEMBRE 1995 1995, 70, 261-268 No. 37 World Health Organization, Geneva Organisation mondiale de la Santé, Genève WEEKLY EPIDEMIOLOGICAL RECORD RELEVE EPIDEMIOLOGIQUE HEBDOMADAIRE 15 SEPTEMBER 1995 c 70th YEAR 70e ANNÉE c 15 SEPTEMBRE 1995 CONTENTS SOMMAIRE Expanded Programme on Immunization – Programme élargi de vaccination – Lot Quality Assurance Evaluation de la couverture vaccinale par la méthode dite de Lot survey to assess immunization coverage, Quality Assurance (échantillonnage par lots pour l'assurance de la qualité), Burkina Faso 261 Burkina Faso 261 Human rabies in the Americas 264 La rage humaine dans les Amériques 264 Influenza 266 Grippe 266 List of infected areas 266 Liste des zones infectées 266 Diseases subject to the Regulations 268 Maladies soumises au Règlement 268 Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) Programme élargi de vaccination (PEV) Lot Quality Assurance survey to assess immunization coverage Evaluation de la couverture vaccinale par la méthode dite de Lot Quality Assurance (échantillonnage par lots pour l'assurance de la qualité) Burkina Faso. In January 1994, national and provincial Burkina Faso. En janvier 1994, les autorités nationales et provin- public health authorities, in collaboration with WHO, con- ciales de santé publique, en collaboration avec l’OMS, ont mené ducted a field survey to evaluate immunization coverage une étude sur le terrain pour évaluer la couverture vaccinale des for children 12-23 months of age in the city of Bobo enfants de 12 à 23 mois dans la ville de Bobo Dioulasso. L’étude a Dioulasso. The survey was carried out using the method of utilisé la méthode dite de Lot Quality Assurance (LQA) plutôt que Lot Quality Assurance (LQA) rather than the 30-cluster la méthode des 30 grappes plus couramment utilisée par les pro- survey method which has traditionally been used by immu- grammes de vaccination. -
GUATEMALA “SMALLER THAN DAVID”: the STRUGGLE of HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS International Fact-Finding Mission Report
GUATEMALA “SMALLER THAN DAVID”: THE STRUGGLE OF HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS International Fact-Finding Mission Report February 2015 Source: Perry-Castañeda Library Map Collection - http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/guatemala.html OMCT and FIDH would like to thank the Republic and Canton of Geneva, Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Finnish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Fondation de France, Fondation “Un Monde par tous”, French Ministry of Foreign Affairs, International Organisation of La Francophonie (OIF), Mairie de Paris, Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Open Society Foundation, Sigrid Rausing Trust (SRT) and Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) for making the publication of this report possible. Its content is the sole responsibility of OMCT and FIDH and should in no way be interpreted as refl ecting the view(s) of the supporting institutions. The Observatory GUATEMALA - “Smaller than David”: The struggle of human rights defenders TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 2 II. HISTORIC, ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL CONTEXT 3 2.1 Civil war and peace treaties 3 2.2 Security, organised crime and violence 3 2.3 The fi ght against impunity 4 2.4 Economic development and poverty 4 2.5 Current political climate 5 III. LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK UNDER WHICH DEFENDERS PURSUE THEIR ACTIVITIES 7 3.1 National framework 7 3.2 International framework 8 3.3 Regional framework 9 3.4 Overview of human rights in the country 9 3.5 The right to defend human rights in Guatemala: legal and institutional framework 10 3.5.1 Human rights legal frameworks essential to the work of human rights defenders 10 3.5.2 Institutional mechanisms for protecting human rights defenders 18 3.6 Conclusions on the legal and institutional framework under which defenders pursue their activities 20 IV. -
Better Solutions. Fewer Disasters. Safer World
BetterNDPBA solutions. Guatemala Final Report: Authors Fewer disasters. Safer world. Guatemala 1 National Disaster Preparedness Baseline Assessment - Final Report 2 NDPBA Guatemala Final Report: Authors Authors Erin Hughey, PhD Scott Kuykendall, MS Director of Disaster Services Disaster Management Specialist Pacific Disaster Center Pacific Disaster Center [email protected] [email protected] Joseph Green, PhD Paulo Fernandes, Jr. Epidemiologist and Health Risk Disaster Services Analyst Specialist Pacific Disaster Center Pacific Disaster Center [email protected] [email protected] Dan Morath, MS, GISP Rachel Leuck, MS Senior Disaster Risk Analyst Disaster Services Analyst Pacific Disaster Center Pacific Disaster Center [email protected] [email protected] Doug Mayne, MaOL, CEM® Cassie Stelow, MS Disaster Management Advisor Senior Disaster Services Analyst Pacific Disaster Center Pacific Disaster Center [email protected] [email protected] © 2018 Pacific Disaster Center Table 1. Record of Changes Date Description Version 1/2/2018 Technical edit of NDBPA Guatemala report Mark Shwartz 2/6/2018 Final Review V9 3 4 NDPBA Guatemala Final Report: Acknowledgements Acknowledgements A special mahalo to Guatemala’s Coordinadora Nacional para la Reducción de Desastres (CONRED) for providing coordination and insight throughout the National Disaster Preparedness Baseline Assessment (NDPBA) project. Additional thanks to the Secretaría de Planificación y Programación (SEGEPLAN) for their support in project coordination and data gathering. CONRED and its partners have -
COMMUNITY CONSERVED AREAS in GUATEMALA 1. Forest Reserve
COMMUNITY CONSERVED AREAS IN GUATEMALA 1. Forest Reserve Todos Santos Cuchumatán Site Name (in Local language and in English) Forest Reserve Todos Santos Cuchumatán Country (include State and Province) Todos Santos Cuchumatán, Huehuetenango Department, Guatemala Area encompassed by the CCA (specify unit of 7,255.4 Ha measurement). GIS Coordinates (if available) Not available Whether it includes sea areas (Yes or no) No Whether it includes freshwater (Yes or no) Yes Marine (Y or N) No Concerned community (name and approx. 23 communities inside and sourrounded: El Pueblo, number of persons) La Ventosa, Chiabal, Tuizoch, Chalhuitz, Tuicoy, Buena Vista, Los Ramírez, Los Chales, Chichim, Chemal I, Chemal II, El Rancho, Batzaloom, Tzunul, Tres Cruces, Chicoy, Villa Alicia, Tuipat, Las Lajas, Tzipoclaj, Tuitujnom and Tuitujmuc/Los Mendoza . There are a total of more than 15,000 inhabitants Is the community considering itself as part of an Yes, Maya Mam indigenous people indigenous people? (Please note Yes or No; if yes note which people) Is the community considering itself a minority? No (Please note Yes or No, if yes on the basis of what, e.g. religion, ethnicity) Is the community permanently settled? (Please Yes, there are communities inside the protected note Yes or No; if the community is mobile, does area and others in the adjacent areas it have a customary transhumance territory? ) Is the community local per capita income Inferior, based on Conap files inferior, basically the same or superior to national value? (please note how confident you are about the information) Is the CCA recognised as a protected area by Yes, recognised as a Forest Reserve by Conap on governmental agencies? (Yes or no; if yes, how? June 28th 2004, through the resolution 153/2004 If no, is it otherwise recognized?) Conflicts with land tenure, natural resource use? There are conflicts between communities for the use of fire wood and wood, because some communities do not have enough area to supply their needs. -
Map 1. Guatemala Oil Infrastructure
72817 REPUBLIC OF GUATEMALA Public Disclosure Authorized Preliminary Scoping Report of the Reconciliation of Mining and Hydrocarbon Sector Payments and Revenues Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized EITI-Guatemala Executive Secretariat September 11th 2011 Public Disclosure Authorized 1 FOREWORD This report has been prepared by Ms Hilda Harnack, Oil, as and Mining Unit consultant at the Sustainable Energy Department at the World Bank. The report does not compromise the Government official version, nor that of the sector companies’ or of the World Bank, , that financed it. The author thanks the following people for the information supplied for the preparation of this report and for their patience in answering her many questions: Ministry of Energy and Mines: Engineer Oscar Rosal, Coordinator, Mining Development Department Engineer Fernando Arevalo, Advisor, International Cooperation Area Engineer Mario Rene Godinez Ortiz, Coordinator, Economic Development Analysis, Hydrocarbon General Directorate Superintendency of Tax Administration: Ms. Delia Castillo Elias, head, Management Department, Collection and Management Intendance Banco de Guatemala: Mr. Byron Leopoldo Sagastume Hernandez, Director, Accounting Department Ministry of Public Finances: Mr. Donald Eduardo Cuevas Cerezo, Director, Fiscal Analysis and Evaluation Directorate Mr. Jorge Guillermo escobar Paz, Technical Advisor, Fiscal Analysis and Evaluation Directorate Mr. Alvaro Enrique Samayoa Arana, Principal Expert in the SIAF-SAG Project Implementation, Accounts Comptroller’s Office Mr Juan Manuel López, National Treasurer Companies: Ms. Regina Rivera de Cerezo, Corporate Relations Manager, Compañía Guatemalteca de Niquel Mr. Mario marroquin Rivera, Executive Director, Goldcorp Guatemala Mr. Fredy Misael Gudiel Samayoa, Legal Department Manager, Perenco Guatemala Limited Ms. Evelyn Vanessa Rodas Molina, Legal Assistant, Perenco Guatemala Limited The author is especially thankful to Mr. -
Abortion and Postabortion Care in Guatemala: a Report from Health Care Professionals and Health Facilities
Abortion and Postabortion Care in Guatemala: A Report from Health Care Professionals and Health Facilities Elena Prada, Edgar Kestler, Caroline Sten, Lindsay Dauphinee, and Lilian Ramírez Occasional Report No. 18 December 2005 Acknowledgments Abortion and Postabortion Care in Guatemala: A Special thanks are due to the following Guatemala Report from Health Care Professionals and Health personnel who collected the data: regional coordinators Facilities is the first in a series of reports from the Zoila Calderón, Zully Hernández and Lilian Ramírez, Guttmacher Institute and its Guatemala partners that and interviewers Maria Borrayo, Flor de María Castillo, offers research findings about unsafe abortion in Nora Díaz, Elizabeth Fajardo, Ana Guadrón, Rosandra Guatemala. Susheela Singh, vice president for research Guzmán, Yolanda López, Blanca Marroquín, Bernarda at the Guttmacher Institute and Akinrinola Bankole, di- Méndez, Diana Pérez, Fabiola Reyna and Brenda Torres. rector of international research, oversaw the process from the development of the study design through the Suggested citation: Prada E et al., Abortion and production of this report. The authors thank Luisa postabortion care in Guatemala: a report from health Cabal, Center for Reproductive Rights; Rebecca Kola- care professionals and health facilities, Occasional dycz, International Planned Parenthood Federation; Report, New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2005, No. 18. Romeo Menéndez, OB/GYN Society of Guatemala; Martha Murdock, Family Care International; Sandra To order this report, go to www.guttmacher.org. García, Population Council; and Clemetine Rossier, In- stitut National D’études Démographiques for having ©2005, Guttmacher Institute, A Not-for-Profit Corpo- provided insightful comments and suggestions on an ration for Reproductive Health Research, Policy early draft. -
Shade and Agronomic Intensification in Coffee Agroforestry Systems
ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 26 April 2021 doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.645958 Shade and Agronomic Intensification in Coffee Agroforestry Systems: Trade-Off or Synergy? Jeremy Haggar 1*, Fernando Casanoves 2, Rolando Cerda 2, Stefania Cerretelli 1, Sergio Gonzalez-Mollinedo 3, Gracia Lanza 2, Erick Lopez 3, Benjamin Leiva 4 and Alejandra Ospina 2 1 Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Chatham Maritime, Medway, United Kingdom, 2 Centro Agronómico de Investigación y Enseñanza (CATIE), Turrialba, Costa Rica, 3 Centro Estudios Ambientales y Biodiversidad, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Cuidad de Guatemala, Guatemala, 4 Observatorio Económico Sostenible, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Cuidad de Guatemala, Guatemala Despite many years of research, there is still a lack of consensus as to the nature of the relationship between shade trees and agronomic intensification in coffee agroforestry systems. While some studies find unshaded intensively managed coffee is the most productive, other studies find no trade-off between shade characteristics and productivity. Our study of 179 farms from the main coffee growing regions of Costa Rica and Guatemala analyzed how shade affected the productive response of coffee Edited by: to intensification of agronomic management. Four levels of coffee productivity were Ana Isabel Moreno-Calles, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de differentiated for each country associated with three levels of shade development in México, Mexico Costa Rica and two levels in Guatemala. The highest coffee productivity group was Reviewed by: associated with medium shade development in both countries. High shade groups had Ivette Perfecto, University of Michigan, United States low productivity, but very low productivity groups were associated with low (Costa Rica) Ek Del-Val, or medium (Guatemala) shade. -
Guatemala Medical Summary
Guatemala Medical Summary The health risk information presented here is summarized from Shoreland Travax®, a decision-support tool used by health care providers to perform a detailed health risk analysis based on specific locations, individual travel styles, and traveler risk behaviors. Travax provides practitioners current, independently researched malaria risk and prevention recommendations in a map-based format that goes beyond the annual WHO and US CDC statements included here. Not included here are current reports from Travax of disease outbreaks or environmental events that may pose elevated risks to travelers’ health and safety. The Providers section of this site offers a directory of health care providers who utilize Shoreland Travax for travel health counseling. Learn more about the detailed reports and maps available from these practitioners (includes links to samples). General Information Guatemala is a developing nation classified as upper middle income. Located in Central America (south of Mexico and west of Belize), the climate is classified as humid equatorial (long dry season) in the south and humid equatorial (no dry season) in the north, with cooler temperatures in some high-altitude areas. Vaccinations Yellow Fever Although yellow fever does not occur in Guatemala, an official yellow fever vaccination certificate may be required depending on your itinerary. Requirement: A vaccination certificate is required for travelers aged ≥ 1 year coming from countries with risk of YF transmission. This also applies to airport transit stops (no exit through immigration checkpoint) longer than 12 hours in risk countries. Other Vaccines Depending on your itinerary, your personal risk factors, and the length of your visit, your health care provider may offer you vaccination against hepatitis A, hepatitis B, influenza, measles, mumps, rubella, rabies, or typhoid fever. -
Infected Areas As at 11 March 1993 Zones Infectées Au 11 Mars 1993
operational, providing immunization to all people aged over de vacciner toutes les personnes de plus de 6 mois. Au lundi 8 mars 6 months. By Monday, 8 March 1993, a total number of 1993, un total de 507 832 personnes avaient été vaccinées sur un 507 832 people had been immunized out of a projected total prévu de 600 000-700 000. Jusqu’ici, 900 000 doses de vaccin target of 600 000-700 000. So far, 900 000 doses of 17D antiamaril 17D et les aiguilles et seringues nécessaires ont été acqui yellow fever vaccine as well as an appropriate number of ses. needles and syringes have been procured. Additionally, an in-depth mosquito survey is ongoing En outre, une enquête approfondie sur les moustiques est en and m any Aedes afncanus, a known mosquito vector of cours et de nombreux Aedes qfricanus, moustiques vecteurs du virus yellow fever virus, have been captured; however, no de la fièvre jaune, ont été capturés; toutefois, on ria trouvé aucun Ae. aegypti have been found in association with human Ae. aegypti associé à des habitations humaines. Une enquête sur les dwellings. A concurrent primate survey revealed the pres primates menée concurremment a révélé la présence de singes verts ence of African grey monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops), a africains (Cercopithecus aethiops), hôtes amplificateurs potentiels du potential amplifying host of yellow fever virus in nature. virus amaril dans la nature. Editorial Note: The yellow fever vaccine may be given Note de la Rédaction: La vaçcmanon antiamarile peut être prati from 6 months of age and is highly effective against the quée à partir de l’âge de 6 mois et elle est très efficace contre la disease.