DOCSLIB.ORG

Section 8 Airport Plans

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Master Plan Update Section 8 – Airport Plans SECTION 8 AIRPORT PLANS The major improvements outlined in the parties responsible for preparing the plans. preferred alternative are incorporated into the Graphic representations of the airport location updated Airport Layout Plan (ALP) drawing set. (scale 1" = 500,000" or sectional aeronautical chart) The ALP is a group of drawings that serve as the and the airport vicinity (scale 1" = 24,000" or USGS primary tool for the guidance of future growth at 7 minute quadrangle map) are also presented on the Airport. The various drawings depict the the cover sheet for orientation purposes. recommendations contained within this Master Plan Update with regard to aviation development 8.2 AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN (ALP) at Nampa Municipal Airport. The ALP set was reduced from its working size of 24-inch x 36-inch The ALP depicts existing facilities and future to be incorporated here for easy reference. The improvements recommended as a result of this ALP drawing set consists of nine (9) unique plan Master Plan Update. The ALP was developed in sheets and specifically includes the following: accordance with FAA AC 150/5070-6B Change 1, Airport Master Plans and the FAA’s Airport x Cover Sheet Layout Plan Drawing Set Checklist. x Airport Layout Plan (ALP) x General Aviation Area Drawings The Airport Data Table includes information x Airport Airspace Plan related to the overall airport such as elevations, x Inner Portion of the Approach Surface airport reference point (ARP) coordinates, mean Drawings maximum daily temperature in the hottest month, x Airport/Community Land Use Drawing and airport reference code (ARC). The ARC refers x Airport Property Map to the FAA system for relating airport design criteria to operational and physical characteristics These drawings are presented in 11-inch × 17-inch of aircraft using and anticipated to use the airport. (not to scale) format at the end of this chapter. As indicated, full size drawings (24-inch x 36-inch) The Runway Data Table presents information for have been provided through a separate package each runway such as runway end coordinates, for the City and agency approvals and use. approach category, dimensions, airfield surface Subsequent sections provide brief descriptions of and pavement strengths, instrumentation, lighting their elements. and marking, approach aids, and safety area dimensions. 8.1 COVER SHEET The ALP reflects improvements recommended in The Cover Sheet lists the contents of the drawing this Master Plan Update through the 2028 set and identifies the airport owner and the planning horizon for Nampa Municipal Airport 8-1 Master Plan Update Section 8 – Airport Plans including airfield improvements, such as new category and type of existing or planned taxiway connectors, and areas to be reserved for approach. It is recommended that local future landside development including hangars jurisdictions incorporate any modifications to the and various ramp areas associated with based or Imaginary Surfaces as part of applicable zoning transient tie-downs. Improvements recommended ordinances. USGS quadrangle maps were used as beyond the 2028 planning horizon are also the basemap for this sheet. The Airport Airspace reflected on the ALP. Notable projects among Plan depicts the FAR Part 77 imaginary surfaces these ultimate phase improvements include a for Nampa Municipal Airport. south parallel runway and associated taxiway system, extension of the existing runway to 6,000 The ultimate runway configuration is analyzed as feet, and potential areas of expansion for general part of this airspace plan, in which an ultimate aviation facilities and an industrial park 1,000-foot runway extension to the existing development. runway and a 3,200-foot parallel runway is included. 8.3 GENERAL AVIATION AREA DRAWINGS The runway plans and profiles provide an The General Aviation Area drawings provide a overview of known significant obstructions along large-scale depiction of existing building and the runway length and in the approach zones off apron areas on the airport as well as areas the ends of each runway. Existing approach highlighting future landside facilities including slopes are noted as well as the ground profile space for aircraft apron and hangar development. along the runway centerline and beneath the approach surfaces to provide guidance in 8.4 AIRPORT AIRSPACE PLAN calculating exact distances between ground surfaces and approach surfaces. This drawing This sheet incorporates a graphic representation should be used by airport management to ensure of the Imaginary Surfaces as described within that all obstructions that penetrate the imaginary FAR Part 77, identifying and defining imaginary surfaces are either removed or marked in an surfaces intended to protect airspace in the appropriate manner. vicinity of airports. The Imaginary Surfaces are established in relation to the airport elevation and The surfaces shown in the Airspace Plan include: to each runway end. They define those areas x Primary Surface where the safe operation of aircraft necessitates x Approach Surfaces that the height of objects be regulated. This x Horizontal Surface regulation typically occurs through the x Transitional Surfaces establishment of height zoning ordinances by x Conical Surface local governments. Penetration of these surfaces by an object or structure can result in an The following subsections provide a more obstruction affecting navigable airspace. The size detailed discussion of each surface. of each imaginary surface is based on the runway 8-2 Master Plan Update Section 8 – Airport Plans 8.4.1 Primary Surface nonprecision approach for Runway End 29. Visual approaches are assumed for both ends of The primary surface is longitudinally centered on the ultimate parallel Runway 11R-29L. each runway. When a runway has a specially prepared hard surface, the primary surface Table 8.1 summarizes the dimensions of the extends 200 feet beyond each end of the usable approach surfaces for Runways 11-29 and 11L- runway. The widths of primary surfaces 29R under ultimate levels of development. applicable to the Airport’s runways are 500 feet for both Runway 11-29 and the ultimate parallel 8.4.3 Horizontal Surface runway 11R-29L. The horizontal surface is a horizontal plane 150 8.4.2 Approach Surfaces feet above the established airport elevation. At the Nampa Municipal, the airport elevation is The approach surfaces are longitudinally centered 2,537 feet above MSL; therefore, the horizontal on the extended runway centerlines, and extend surface’s elevation is 2,687 feet MSL. In plan outward and upward from each end of the view, the dimensions of the horizontal surface are primary surface. The slopes and dimensions of established by striking arcs from a point at the these surfaces are determined for each runway intersection of the extended runway centerlines end based on the type of approach to be provided. and the lines designating the end of the primary The existing and ultimate development scenario surface for each runway; the arcs are then at Nampa Municipal includes a nonprecision connected by lines tangent to these arcs. The radii approach for Runway End 11. Runway End 29 of the arcs are 5,000 feet for all visual runways currently has a visual approach. The future and and 10,000 for all other runways. ultimate development scenarios include a Table 8.1 Approach Surface Dimensions by Runway End Approach Surface Dimension Runway 11 Runway 29 Runway 11L Runway 29R Inner Width 500 500 500 500 Outer Width 3,500 3,500 1,500 1,500 Length beyond Primary Surface 10,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 Source: Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 14: Aeronautics and Space, Part 77, Subpart C 8.4.4 Transitional Surfaces the horizontal surface or any other surface where more critical restrictions are applicable. The transitional surfaces are inclined planes with slopes of 7:1; they extend outward and upward from the primary and approach surfaces, terminating at the point where they intersect with 8-3 Master Plan Update Section 8 – Airport Plans 8.4.5 Conical Surface guidance by categorizing all areas of the Airport by specific functional use. The conical surface is an inclined plane extending outward and upward from the outer boundary of The other principal purpose of this plan is to the horizontal surface at a slope of 20:1; it extends provide overall developmental guidance for areas for a horizontal distance of 4,000 feet. The top of immediately adjacent to, but off the airport and the conical surface is at a height of 2,887 feet MSL. influenced by airport operation. The off-airport areas illustrate relationships with the boundaries 8.5 INNER PORTION OF THE APPROACH of the airport property, land use as designated by SURFACE DRAWINGS the controlling jurisdictions, and noise contours. Noise contours represented include the 65 day- These drawings provide plan and profile view night sound level (DNL) contours, and reflect depictions of the existing and ultimate approach existing land use relative to acceptable noise areas and detailed views of the physical features compatibility guidelines. near each runway’s extended centerline. These include topography, roads, structures, 8.7 AIRPORT PROPERTY MAP obstructions, and incompatible objects in these critical areas. A table summarizes the existing The Airport Property Map identifies land penetrations to the inner approach surfaces and comprising the Airport and provides details their proposed disposition. concerning the way various parcels of land were acquired or disposed of in past years. Based upon 8.6 AIRPORT/COMMUNITY LAND USE existing printed sources, documents concerning DRAWING land acquisitions are identified, as well as the means used to acquire the property. The Airport/Community Land Use Drawing are a graphic representation indicating general developmental guidelines for all existing on- airport property, property within the 65 day-night sound level (DNL) noise contour, and any proposed acquisition areas.
Recommended publications
  • 5. RECOMMENDED PROJECTS Residents Noted Crossing Issues at a Few Specific Intersections

    5. RECOMMENDED PROJECTS Residents Noted Crossing Issues at a Few Specific Intersections

    Boise Central Bench Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan 5. RECOMMENDED PROJECTS residents noted crossing issues at a few specific intersections. Each intersection will require its own This chapter discusses project recommendations for the review to determine the most appropriate treatment. Central Bench’s pedestrian and bicycle network. These Lighting at intersections should be carefully considered. infrastructure improvements are intended to enhance pedestrian/bicycle access and circulation as well as help Table 3 provides further information on each project identi- pedestrians and bicyclists feel more comfortable traveling fied in Figure 16. Projects in Table 3 are listed alphabetically within and through the Central Bench. This chapter focuses under their respective neighborhood association and road- on engineering and infrastructure improvements. way functional classification. The table indicates if the proj- The majority of the projects were identified by members of ect is also included in one of the previous plans described in the public and agency stakeholders through the outreach Chapter 2. Many of the projects in Table 3 will be evaluated process. Several projects have been previously identified in using ACHD’s Community Programs prioritization process. the Roadways to Bikeways Plan or other planning documents. This process considers a range of factors (e.g., proximity to schools, major roads, available funding, city or school dis- PEDESTRIAN PROJECTS trict support, etc.). Appendix ‘B’ contains more information on this process, as well as the results of applying the techni- Figure 16 shows the recommended set of projects to improve cal criteria to the projects below. Note that scoring in Appen- the existing pedestrian network in the Boise Central Bench dix ‘B’ does not represent a complete or final prioritization study area.
  • Notice of Poll

    Notice of Poll

    NOTICE OF POLL Stroud District Election of a District Councillor for Amberley and Woodchester Notice is hereby given that: 1. A poll for the election of a District Councillor for Amberley and Woodchester will be held on Thursday 5 May 2016, between the hours of 7:00 am and 10:00 pm. 2. The number of District Councillors to be elected is ONE. 3. The names, home addresses and descriptions of the Candidates remaining validly nominated for election and the names of all persons signing the Candidates nomination paper are as follows: Description (if Names of Signatories Name of Candidate Home Address any) Proposers(+), Seconders(++) & Assentors Hilary D Woodward Olivia Dell (+) (++) Fieldhurst, Marion T Mako CUTCHER Peter R Barnes James Leamon Rooksmoor Hill, Green Party Adriana Ghods Martyn George Richard U H Shetliffe Stroud, GL5 5NB Harriet A Shetliffe Dylan Jones Gemma E Harding The Ram Inn, Michael Mcasey (+) Eileen M Mc Asey (++) MCASEY South The Conservative Harry G Finch Peter D Brown Anita M Brown Benjamin T Folliard Philip Louis Woodchester, Party Candidate Victoria A Rowlands James W Rowlands GL5 5EL Margaret R Wigzell Stephen R Wigzell Richard G Greenslade Rodney J Harris (+) Journeys End, (++) Sarah Tate SMITH Pinfarthings, Labour and Co- Stephen F Thorpe Sally E Thorpe Sheila B Booth Jo Amberley, Stroud, operative Party Christopher A Booth Anthony R Howarth Joan M Howarth GL5 5JJ Harold J H Pugh 4. The situation of Polling Stations and the description of persons entitled to vote thereat are as follows: Station Ranges of electoral register numbers of Situation of Polling Station Number persons entitled to vote thereat Amberley Inn, Culver Hill, Amberley 1 AW1-1 to AW1-772 Woodchester Village Hall, Church Road, North Woodchester 2 AW2-1 to AW2-960 5.
  • 39324 23-10 Nationalgazette

    39324 23-10 Nationalgazette

    Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID AFRIKA Regulation Gazette No. 10177 Regulasiekoerant October Vol. 604 23 2015 No. 39324 Oktober PART 1 OF 2 ISSN 1682-5843 N.B. The Government Printing Works will 39324 not be held responsible for the quality of “Hard Copies” or “Electronic Files” submitted for publication purposes 9 771682 584003 AIDS HELPLINE: 0800-0123-22 Prevention is the cure 2 No. 39324 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 23 OCTOBER 2015 IMPORTANT I nfarmai,o-w from Government Printing Works Dear Valued Customers, Government Printing Works has implemented rules for completing and submitting the electronic Adobe Forms when you, the customer, submits your notice request. Please take note of these guidelines when completing your form. GPW Business Rules 1. No hand written notices will be accepted for processing, this includes Adobe ,-..,. forms which have been completed by hand. 2. Notices can only be submitted in Adobe electronic form format to the email submission address submit.egazette @gpw.gov.za. This means that any notice submissions not on an Adobe electronic form that are submitted to this mailbox will be rejected. National or Provincial gazette notices, where the Z95 or Z95Prov must be an Adobe form but the notice content (body) will be an attachment. 3. Notices brought into GPW by "walk -in" customers on electronic media can only be submitted in Adobe electronic form format. This means that any notice submissions not on an Adobe electronic form that are submitted by the customer on electronic media will be rejected. National or Provincial gazette notices, where the Z95 or Z95Prov must be an Adobe form but the notice content (body) will be an attachment.
  • April 19, 2020

    April 19, 2020

    Union County Sheriff’s Office Daily Media Release Date: 4/19/2020 Date Time Nature Details 4/19/2020 05:10 Dispute Deputies were dispatched to a residence in the 23000 block of North Darby Coe Road to resolve a dispute between family members. No report was taken. 4/19/2020 12:35 Theft Deputies investigated the theft of mail from a residence in the 20000 block of Coleman- Brake Road. A report was taken, #20-0231. 4/19/2020 12:45 Domestic A deputy was sent to a home in the 10000 block of State Route 4 to resolve a domestic dispute between a husband and wife. No report was taken. 4/19/2020 14:43 Dispute Deputies were dispatched to a residence in the 23000 block of North Darby Coe Road to resolve a dispute between a stepfather and stepson. No report was taken. 4/19/2020 15:02 Trespassing A deputy was sent to a farm field on Heenan Road near West Mansfield-Mount Victory Road to investigate a trespassing complaint. No report was taken. 4/19/2020 15:29 Overdose Deputies and units from the Pleasant Valley Fire District responded to a residence in the 15000 block of Middleburg Plain City Road for an overdose. A report was taken, #20- 0233. 4/19/2020 16:27 Arrest Warrant A Union County Deputy met with a Hardin County Deputy to take custody of Stephanie M. Lynn, age 39 of Kenton for an outstanding arrest warrant. She was transported to the Tri County Regional Jail. 4/19/2020 19:05 Drug Paraphernalia A deputy was dispatched to a residence in the 23000 block of North Darby Coe Road to investigate possible drugs and drug paraphernalia that were found at the residence.
  • Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiin Wo 2011/161427 A3 Wo 2011/161427

    Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiin Wo 2011/161427 A3 Wo 2011/161427

    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2011/161427 A3 29 December 2011 (29.12.2011) PCT (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every A61K 38/17 (2006.01) A61P 5/50 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, A61P 3/10 (2006.01) A61P 21/00 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ, A61P 3/04 (2006.01) CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, (21) International Application Number: HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, PCT/GB2011/000966 KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, (22) International Filing Date: ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, 27 June 2011 (27.06.2011) NO, NZ, OM, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, RO, RS, RU, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, (25) Filing Language: English TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (26) Publication Language: English (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (30) Priority Data: kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, 61/358,596 25 June 2010 (25.06.2010) US GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, 61/384,652 20 September 2010 (20.09.2010) US ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ, 61/420,677 7 December 2010 (07.12.2010) US TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): ASTON LV, MC, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SI, SK, UNIVERSITY [GB/GB]; Aston Triangle, Birmingham SM, TR), OAPI (BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI, CM, GA, GN, GQ, B4 7ET (GB).
  • BCC MB 48/3356 MAY 7, 2009 the Board of County Commissioners

    BCC MB 48/3356 MAY 7, 2009 the Board of County Commissioners

    MAY 7, 2009 The Board of County Commissioners, Manatee County, Florida, met in REGULAR SESSION in the Administrative Center, 1112 Manatee Avenue West, Bradenton, Florida, at 9:02 a.m. Present were Commissioners: Gwendolyn Y. Brown, Chairman Carol Whitmore, First Vice-Chairman Donna Hayes, Second Vice-Chairman Lawrence E. Bustle, Jr., Third Vice-Chairman John R. Chappie Ron Getman Joe McClash Also present were: John Osborne, Interim Planning Director Sarah Schenk, Assistant County Attorney Susan G. Romine, Board Records Manager, representing R. B. Shore, Clerk of Circuit Court Invocation by Rev. Herb McMillian, First Church of Nazarene. All witnesses and staff giving testimony were duly sworn. AGENDA Agenda of May 7, 2009, and update memorandum. BC20090507DOC001 PUBLIC HEARINGS – PRESENTATIONS UPON REQUEST ZONING Public hearing (Notices published) was opened to consider PDR-05-27(P) WOODLANDS OF MANATEE LLC/COVENTRY PARK SUBDIVISION (CONTINUED TO JUNE 4, 2009) ORDINANCE OF MANATEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, REGARDING LAND DEVELOPMENT, APPROVING A PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN FOR 256 RESIDENTIAL LOTS, CONSISTING OF 193 LOTS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED, AND 63 LOTS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED RESIDENCES, WITH AT LEAST 25 PERCENT OF THE UNITS DESIGNATED AS AFFORDABLE HOUSING, ON APPROXIMATELY 105.97 ACRES WEST OF ERIE ROAD AND SOUTH OF FP&L RAILROAD AT 5901 ERIE ROAD, PALMETTO; SUBJECT TO STIPULATIONS AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; SETTING FORTH FINDINGS; PROVIDING A LEGAL DESCRIPTION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Ellsworth Welton, Shannon Acreman, Steve Royce, and David Smiley spoke in opposition due to density, compatibility, proposed parking issues, an unsafe park area situated near a drainage canal, and traffic concerns.
  • A Case for Always Flying the Aircraft…Even When It Won't

    A Case for Always Flying the Aircraft…Even When It Won't

    AE S RONAUTIC Winter 2011 Serving Idaho’s Aviation Community for over 60 Years Vol 57, Issue 1 A Case for Always Flying the Aircraft…Even When It Won’t By: Dennis Scifres I began a Early one October morning in 2008, slow left turn eager to put in a day of deer hunting to remain up on the Middle Fork of the Salmon, within the I headed out to the Caldwell Airport canyon and felt and my trusty Cessna 185. Although I a very slight was very anxious to get airborne, it had bump in the just come out of maintenance, and I control yoke as wanted to be especially meticulous with I moved the the preflight and every checklist item. ailerons. I tried In spite of my caution, I lifted off of to increase the runway 12 by 7:15. It was just bank, but beginning to get light in the east as I nothing headed toward the Middle Fork. happened. The control yoke As I climbed out, I heard Boise went well Approach talking to an airliner, asking beyond its The cockpit shortly after landing. Photo by Dennis Scifres about any icing conditions they may normal stop without a corresponding returned to a nearly level position and have encountered. Other than light rime increase in turn. I then reversed the then began to increase bank again, icing between 14,500 and 16,500, they yoke, moving it all the way to the right, stopping at about 25 degrees, all without reported nothing else. Icing would not still with no corresponding change.
  • 2010-11 Are the Implementation of the New IPEDS Race Categories in the Enrollment and Degrees Files and the Implementation of 2010 CIP Codes in the Program Inventory

    2010-11 Are the Implementation of the New IPEDS Race Categories in the Enrollment and Degrees Files and the Implementation of 2010 CIP Codes in the Program Inventory

    COMPREHENSIVE DATABASE REPORTING GUIDELINES STATE SUPPORTED INSTITUTIONS 2010-2011 1024 CAPITAL CENTER DR. SUITE 320 FRANKFORT, KY 40601 502-573-1555 WWW.CPE.KY.GOV http://www.cpe.state.ky.us/aboutus/ aboutus_council_meetings_materials.asp Kentucky Council on Postsecondary Education Steven L. Beshear 1024 Capital Center Drive, Suite 320 Robert L. King Governor Frankfort, Kentucky 40601 President Phone: 502-573-1555 Fax: 502-573-1535 http://www.cpe.ky.gov M E M O R A N D U M TO: Comprehensive Data Base Guidelines Users FROM: Heidi Hiemstra, Assistant Vice President, Information and Research DATE: August 20, 2010 SUBJECT: Summary of Changes for 2010/11 Reporting Guidelines The primary changes to the Reporting Guidelines for 2010-11 are the implementation of the new IPEDS race categories in the enrollment and degrees files and the implementation of 2010 CIP codes in the program inventory. As previously communicated, the new race/ethnicity codes will be collected at both the detail and summary levels, with the IPEDS summary codes taking the place of the old race field. To assist with development of the Council’s 2011-15 Statewide Diversity Policy, a new section of definitions relating to this policy has been added and will be incorporated by reference into the final diversity policy. Other changes include tweaks to the transfer file and the removal of any reference to KET courses, as those courses are no longer offered. If you have questions or concerns, please let me know. If you would like to be added to a listserv for discussion of these guidelines, please contact me at [email protected].
  • Advertising Opportunity Guide Print

    Advertising Opportunity Guide Print

    AAAE’S AAAE DELIVERS FOR AIRPORT EXECUTIVES NO.1 RATED PRODUCT M AG A Z IN E AAAEAAAE DELIVERSDELIVERS FOR AIRPORTAIRPORT EXECUTIVESEXECUTIVES AAAE DELIVERS FOR AIRPORT EXECUTIVES AAAE DELIVERS FOR AIRPORT EXECUTIVES MMAGAZINE AG A Z IN E MAGAZINE MAGAZINE www.airportmagazine.net | August/September 2015 www.airportmagazine.net | June/July 2015 www.airportmagazine.net | February/March 2015 NEW TECHNOLOGY AIDS AIRPORTS, PASSENGERS NON-AERONAUTICAL REVENUE SECURITYU.S. AIRPORT TRENDS Airport Employee n Beacons Deliver Airport/ Screening Retail Trends Passenger Benefits n Hosting Special Events UAS Security Issues Editorial Board Outlook for 2015 n CEO Interview Airport Diversity Initiatives Risk-Based Security Initiatives ADVERTISING OPPORTUNITY GUIDE PRINT ONLINE DIGITAL MOBILE AIRPORT MAGAZINE AIRPORT MAGAZINE ANDROID APP APPLE APP 2016 | 2016 EDITORIAL MISSION s Airport Magazine enters its 27th year of publication, TO OUR we are proud to state that we continue to produce AVIATION Atop quality articles that fulfill the far-ranging needs of airports, including training information; the lessons airports INDUSTRY have learned on subjects such as ARFF, technology, airfield and FRIENDS terminal improvements; information about the state of the nation’s economy and its impact on air service; news on regulatory and legislative issues; and much more. Further, our magazine continues to make important strides to bring its readers practical and timely information in new ways. In addition to printed copies that are mailed to AAAE members and subscribers, we offer a full digital edition, as well as a free mobile app that can be enjoyed on Apple, Android and Kindle Fire devices. In our app you will discover the same caliber of content you’ve grown to expect, plus mobile-optimized text, embedded rich media, and social media connectivity.
  • UFC) Started in 1993 As a Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) Tournament on Pay‐Per‐View to Determine the World’S Greatest Martial Arts Style

    UFC) Started in 1993 As a Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) Tournament on Pay‐Per‐View to Determine the World’S Greatest Martial Arts Style

    Mainstream Expansion and Strategic Analysis Ram Kandasamy Victor Li David Ye Contents 1 Introduction 2 Market Analysis 2.1 Overview 2.2 Buyers 2.3 Fighters 2.4 Substitutes 2.5 Complements 3 Competitive Analysis 3.1 Entry 3.2 Strengths 3.3 Weaknesses 3.4 Competitors 4 Strategy Analysis 4.1 Response to Competitors 4.2 Gymnasiums 4.3 International Expansion 4.4 Star Promotion 4.5 National Television 5 Conclusion 6 References 1 1. Introduction The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) started in 1993 as a mixed martial arts (MMA) tournament on pay‐per‐view to determine the world’s greatest martial arts style. Its main draw was its lack of rules. Weight classes did not exist and rounds continued until one of the competitors got knocked out or submitted to his opponent. Although the UFC initially achieved underground success, it was regarded more as a spectacle than a sport and never attained mainstream popularity. The perceived brutality of the event led to political scrutiny and pressure. Attacks from critics caused the UFC to establish a set of unified rules with greater emphasis placed on the safety. The UFC also successfully petitioned to become sanctioned by the Nevada State Athletic Commission. However, these changes occurred too late to have an impact and by 2001, the parent organization of the UFC was on the verge of bankruptcy. The brand was sold to Zuffa LLC, marking the beginning of the UFC’s dramatic rise in popularity. Over the next eight years, the UFC evolved from its underground roots into the premier organization of a rapidly growing sport.
  • City Council Agenda Packet May 03, 2010

    City Council Agenda Packet May 03, 2010

    Agenda Packet NORFOLK CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 03, 2010 5:30 p.m. Created 4/29/2010 10:21 AM https://norfolkne.gov/ Page 1 of 69 City of Norfolk Elizabeth A. Deck Email Address: [email protected] 127 North First Street City Clerk (402) 844-2000 Fax: (402) 844-2001 Norfolk, Nebraska 68701 NOTICE OF MEETING CITY OF NORFOLK, NEBRASKA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a meeting of the City Council of the City of Norfolk, Nebraska, will be held at 5:30 p.m. on Monday, May 03, 2010, in the Council Chambers, 309 W. Madison Avenue, Norfolk, Nebraska, which meeting will be open to the public. The Mayor and City Council reserve the right to adjourn into executive session as per Section 84-1410 of the Nebraska Revised Statutes. An agenda for such meeting, kept continually current, is available at the office of the City Clerk, City Auditorium, 127 North 1st Street, Norfolk Nebraska, during normal business hours. Individuals requiring physical or sensory accommodations, who desire to attend or participate, please contact the City Clerk's office at (402) 844-2000 no later than 4:30 p.m. on the Friday preceding the meeting. Elizabeth A. Deck City Clerk Publish (April 30, 2010) 1 P.O.P. Page 2 of 69 AGENDA NORFOLK CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 03, 2010 In accordance with Section 84-1412 sub-section eight (8) of the Reissue Revised Statutes of the State of Nebraska 1943, as amended, one copy of all reproducible written material to be discussed is available to the public at this meeting for examination and copying.
  • Massachusetts Licensed Motor Vehicle Damage Appraisers - Individuals September 05, 2021

    Massachusetts Licensed Motor Vehicle Damage Appraisers - Individuals September 05, 2021

    COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DIVISION OF INSURANCE PRODUCER LICENSING 1000 Washington Street, Suite 810 Boston, MA 02118-6200 FAX (617) 753-6883 http://www.mass.gov/doi Massachusetts Licensed Motor Vehicle Damage Appraisers - Individuals September 05, 2021 License # Licensure Individual Address City State Zip Phone # 1 007408 01/01/1977 Abate, Andrew Suffolk AutoBody, Inc., 25 Merchants Dr #3 Walpole MA 02081 0-- 0 2 014260 11/24/2003 Abdelaziz, Ilaj 20 Vine Street Lexington MA 02420 0-- 0 3 013836 10/31/2001 Abkarian, Khatchik H. Accurate Collision, 36 Mystic Street Everett MA 02149 0-- 0 4 016443 04/11/2017 Abouelfadl, Mohamed N Progressive Insurance, 2200 Hartford Ave Johnston RI 02919 0-- 0 5 016337 08/17/2016 Accolla, Kevin 109 Sagamore Ave Chelsea MA 02150 0-- 0 6 010790 10/06/1987 Acloque, Evans P Liberty Mutual Ins Co, 50 Derby St Hingham MA 02018 0-- 0 7 017053 06/01/2021 Acres, Jessica A 0-- 0 8 009557 03/01/1982 Adam, Robert W 0-- 0 West 9 005074 03/01/1973 Adamczyk, Stanley J Western Mass Collision, 62 Baldwin Street Box 401 MA 01089 0-- 0 Springfield 10 013824 07/31/2001 Adams, Arleen 0-- 0 11 014080 11/26/2002 Adams, Derek R Junior's Auto Body, 11 Goodhue Street Salem MA 01970 0-- 0 12 016992 12/28/2020 Adams, Evan C Esurance, 31 Peach Farm Road East Hampton CT 06424 0-- 0 13 006575 03/01/1975 Adams, Gary P c/o Adams Auto, 516 Boston Turnpike Shrewsbury MA 01545 0-- 0 14 013105 05/27/1997 Adams, Jeffrey R Rodman Ford Coll Ctr, Route 1 Foxboro MA 00000 0-- 0 15 016531 11/21/2017 Adams, Philip Plymouth Rock Assurance, 901 Franklin Ave Garden City NY 11530 0-- 0 16 015746 04/25/2013 Adams, Robert Andrew Country Collision, 20 Myricks St Berkley MA 02779 0-- 0 17 013823 07/31/2001 Adams, Rymer E 0-- 0 18 013999 07/30/2002 Addesa, Carmen E Arbella Insurance, 1100 Crown Colony Drive Quincy MA 02169 0-- 0 19 014971 03/04/2008 Addis, Andrew R Progressive Insurance, 300 Unicorn Park Drive 4th Flr Woburn MA 01801 0-- 0 20 013761 05/10/2001 Adie, Scott L.