DOCSLIB.ORG

2011 Virginia Outdoors Demand Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2011 Virginia Outdoors Demand Survey 2011 Virginia Outdoors Demand Survey Report of Results Prepared by: James M. Ellis, Ph.D. Director of Research Deborah Rexrode, M.A. Project Manager Peter Furia, Ph.D. Project Manager Jaesook Lee, M.A. Research Analyst David Shreve, Ph.D. Research Analyst Prepared for: Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation February 2012 Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service University of Virginia CSR Project 11.001 2011 VIRGINIA OUTDOORS DEMAND SURVEY Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... i List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................... iv List of Figures ......................................................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................................................... vi Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... vii Purpose of the Survey ............................................................................................................................. vii Survey Methods ...................................................................................................................................... vii Overview ................................................................................................................................................ vii Survey Results ....................................................................................................................................... viii Access to Outdoor Recreation ........................................................................................................... viii Most Needed Recreation Opportunities ............................................................................................ viii Participation in Recreational Activities ............................................................................................. viii Information about Recreational Activities .......................................................................................... ix Amenities, Camping and State Parks .................................................................................................. ix Natural Areas and Their Protection ..................................................................................................... ix Race, Ethnicity and Recreational Activities ..........................................................................................x Summary ...............................................................................................................................................x I. Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................1 Purpose of the Survey ................................................................................................................................1 About the Report .......................................................................................................................................1 II. Survey Methods .....................................................................................................................................2 Questionnaire .........................................................................................................................................2 Sample ...................................................................................................................................................2 Weighting ..............................................................................................................................................2 Survey Protocol .....................................................................................................................................3 Production .............................................................................................................................................3 Survey Response ...................................................................................................................................4 Results of the Mode Experiment ...........................................................................................................4 Recommended Data Collection Approach for 2016 ..............................................................................5 Margin of Error......................................................................................................................................5 III. Survey Results ...................................................................................................................................6 Subgroup Analysis ....................................................................................................................................6 Overview of Respondents..........................................................................................................................6 Homeownership .....................................................................................................................................6 Center for Survey Research i DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND RECREATION Age ....................................................................................................................................................... 7 Hispanic Origin .................................................................................................................................... 7 Race ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 Gender .................................................................................................................................................. 8 Income .................................................................................................................................................. 8 Access to Outdoor Recreation .................................................................................................................. 9 Importance of Access ........................................................................................................................... 9 Participation by Time of Week ............................................................................................................. 9 Sources of Information about Recreation Opportunities ...................................................................... 9 Technology and Recreation ................................................................................................................ 10 Historic Sites ...................................................................................................................................... 11 Natural Areas, Preserves and Refuges ................................................................................................ 11 Camping ............................................................................................................................................. 11 Camping Amenities ............................................................................................................................ 11 Developing Public Campgrounds ....................................................................................................... 12 Most Needed Recreation Opportunities ............................................................................................. 12 Developed Sites vs. Natural Areas ..................................................................................................... 13 Participation in Activities ................................................................................................................... 13 Participation in Outdoor Activities ..................................................................................................... 15 Participation in Organized Sports ....................................................................................................... 15 Participation in Water-Related Activities ........................................................................................... 15 Participation in Wheeled Activities .................................................................................................... 15 Participation in Miscellaneous Activities ........................................................................................... 15 Participation in Winter Activities ....................................................................................................... 16 Virginia’s State Parks ............................................................................................................................. 16 Top Reasons to Have State Parks ....................................................................................................... 16 Reasons for Lack of Use ..................................................................................................................... 16 Importance of Specific Amenities in Virginia State Parks ................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Taxonomic Revision of Rhododendron L. Section Pentanthera G
    A TAXONOMIC REVISION OF RHODODENDRON L. SECTION PENTANTHERA G. DON (ERICACEAE) BY KATHLEEN ANNE KRON A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1987 , ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I gratefully acknowledge the supervision and encouragement given to me by Dr. Walter S. Judd. I thoroughly enjoyed my work under his direction. I would also like to thank the members of my advisory committee, Dr. Bijan Dehgan, Dr. Dana G. Griffin, III, Dr. James W. Kimbrough, Dr. Jonathon Reiskind, Dr. William Louis Stern, and Dr. Norris H. Williams for their critical comments and suggestions. The National Science Foundation generously supported this project in the form of a Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant;* field work in 1985 was supported by a grant from the Highlands Biological Station, Highlands, North Carolina. I thank the curators of the following herbaria for the loan of their material: A, AUA, BHA, DUKE, E, FSU, GA, GH, ISTE, JEPS , KW, KY, LAF, LE NCSC, NCU, NLU NO, OSC, PE, PH, LSU , M, MAK, MOAR, NA, , RSA/POM, SMU, SZ, TENN, TEX, TI, UARK, UC, UNA, USF, VDB, VPI, W, WA, WVA. My appreciation also is offered to the illustrators, Gerald Masters, Elizabeth Hall, Rosa Lee, Lisa Modola, and Virginia Tomat. I thank Dr. R. Howard * BSR-8601236 ii Berg for the scanning electron micrographs. Mr. Bart Schutzman graciously made available his computer program to plot the results of the principal components analyses. The herbarium staff, especially Mr. Kent D. Perkins, was always helpful and their service is greatly appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Weekly Lists for 1992
    United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE P.O. BOX 37127 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20013-7127 IN aEPLy a£F£K TO: The Director of the Natlonal Park service is pleased to Inform you that the fol lowing properties have been entered In the National Register of Historic Places. For further Information cal I 202/343-9542. JAN 3 1992 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 12/23/91 THROJc:>1 12/27/91 KEY: state. county, ProPerty Name. Address/soundary, City, vicinity, Reference Nuntier N-IL status. Action, Date, MUitipie Name ARIZONA. c.ocoNINO co..NTY. Fjrst Baptist church, 123 s. Beaver St .• Flagstaff. 91001576, IIOMINATION, 12/23/91 ARIZONA, COCONINO COl.NTY. Pendley Homestead Historic District. us 89-A, 7 ml.Nor Sedona. Sedona vicinity, 91001857, NOMINATION, 12/23/91 CALIFORNIA, ALAMEDA COlNTY, The Bellevue-Staten. 492 Staten Ave .. 0akland. 91001896, NOMINATION. 12/27/91 CALIFORNIA, ORANOE CQU,ITY, Casa Romantica. 415 Avenlda cranada, San Clemente. 91001900. NOMINATION, 12/27/91 COLORADO, MONTEZUMA CQU,ITY, Mancos High school, 350 crand AVe., Mancos. 91001740. NOMINATION, 12/23/91 IDAHO. CARIBCX.J cou,rry_ Largllliere, Edgar waiter sr. HOuse. 30 west second south st .• soda Springs. 91001870. NOMINATION. 12/23/91 INDIANA, MARION oou,rTY. St. Clair. 109 w. ~t. Clair St., Indianapolis, 83000085. REMOVAL. 12/04/91 (Apartments and Flats of oowntown Indianapolis TR) IOWA. ALLAMAKEE cou,rry, Lans jng Fisher les Bui !ding. Between co. HWy. X-52 and the Miss lss lppi R.. south uns ing. Lans Ing, 91001832. NOMINATION, 12/23/91 <conservation Movement in 1owa MPS) IOWA.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Architectural Resource Survey: Eastern Shore – Accomack And
    HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY EASTERN SHORE—ACCOMACK AND NORTHAMPTON COUNTIES VIRGINIA HURRICANE SANDY DISASTER RELIEF ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR HISTORIC PROPERTIES PREPARED FOR VIRGINIA DEPARMENT OF HISTORIC RESOURCES 2801 Kensington Avenue Richmond, Virginia 23221 PREPARED BY in partnership with DEBRA A. McCLANE Architectural Historian Contract Publication Series 15-374 HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY, EASTERN SHORE, ACCOMACK AND NORTHAMPTON COUNTIES, VIRGINIA Hurricane Sandy Disaster Relief Assistance Program for Historic Properties by Sarah J. Reynolds, M.H.P Prepared for Virginia Department of Historic Resources 2801 Kensington Ave Richmond, VA 23221 Prepared by Cultural Resource Analysts, Inc. 151 Walton Avenue Lexington, Kentucky 40508 Phone: (859) 252-4737 Fax: (859) 254-3747 CRA Project No.: V15V004 _________________________ Alan Higgins, MS Principal Investigator June 2017 intentionally left blank ABSTRACT Between February 2016 and January 2017, Cultural Resource Analysts, Inc., in association with Debra A. McClane, Architectural Historian, completed a historic architectural resource survey of Accomack and Northampton counties on the Eastern Shore of Virginia. This survey was part of a series of projects funded through a $1.5 million Hurricane Sandy Disaster Relief Assistance Grant for Historic Properties that the National Park Service awarded to the Commonwealth of Virginia by way of the Department of Historic Resources in 2014. The pass-through project funds were awarded to seven counties in Virginia, including Accomack and Northampton counties, and administered by the Department of Historic Resources; Accomack County, Northampton County, and the Accomack- Northampton Planning District Commission served as local partners. In the event of future severe storm events or other natural disasters, this initial survey effort will support disaster mitigation planning at the local, county, and regional levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Virginia
    NORTHERN VIRGINIA SALAMANDER RESORT & SPA Middleburg WHAT’S NEW American soldiers in the U.S. Army helped create our nation and maintain its freedom, so it’s only fitting that a museum near the U.S. capital should showcase their history. The National Museum of the United States Army, the only museum to cover the entire history of the Army, opened on Veterans Day 2020. Exhibits include hundreds of artifacts, life-sized scenes re- creating historic battles, stories of individual soldiers, a 300-degree theater with sensory elements, and an experiential learning center. Learn and honor. ASK A LOCAL SPITE HOUSE Alexandria “Small downtown charm with all the activities of a larger city: Manassas DID YOU KNOW? is steeped in history and We’ve all wanted to do it – something spiteful that didn’t make sense but, adventure for travelers. DOWNTOWN by golly, it proved a point! In 1830, Alexandria row-house owner John MANASSAS With an active railway Hollensbury built a seven-foot-wide house in an alley next to his home just system, it’s easy for to spite the horse-drawn wagons and loiterers who kept invading the alley. visitors to enjoy the historic area while also One brick wall in the living room even has marks from wagon-wheel hubs. traveling to Washington, D.C., or Richmond The two-story Spite House is only 25 feet deep and 325 square feet, but on an Amtrak train or daily commuter rail.” NORTHERN — Debbie Haight, Historic Manassas, Inc. VIRGINIA delightfully spiteful! INSTAGRAM- HIDDEN GEM PET- WORTHY The menu at Sperryville FRIENDLY You’ll start snapping Trading Company With a name pictures the moment features favorite like Beer Hound you arrive at the breakfast and lunch Brewery, you know classic hunt-country comfort foods: sausage it must be dog exterior of the gravy and biscuits, steak friendly.
    [Show full text]
  • Jamestown Long Range Interpretive Plan (LRIP)
    Jamestown Colonial National Historical Park Long Range Interpretive Plan Update July 2009 Prepared for the National Park Service by Ron Thomson, Compass Table of Contents Part 1: Foundation Introduction 4 Background 6 Park in 2009 12 Purpose & Significance 19 Interpretive Themes 22 Audiences 29 Audience Experiences 32 Issues & Initiatives 35 Part 2: Taking Action Introduction 38 Projects from 2000 Plan 38 Current Area of Focus 40 Enhance Existing Resources 40 Anniversaries/Events 43 Linking Research, Interpretation & Sales 44 Education Programs 45 Technology for Interpretation 46 Evaluation & Professional Standards 47 Staffing & Training 47 Library, Collection & Research Needs 48 Implementation Charts 52 Participants 59 Appendices 1. Other Planning Documents 60 2. Partner Mission Statements 64 3. Second Century Goals 66 4. Interpretation & Education Renaissance Action Plan 69 5. Children in Nature 71 2 Part 1 The Foundation 3 Introduction The Long Range Interpretive Plan A Long Range Interpretive Plan (LRIP) provides a 5+ year vision for a park’s interpretive program. A facilitator skilled in interpretive planning works with park staff, partners, and outside consultants to prepare a plan that is consistent with other current planning documents. Part 1 of the LRIP establishes criteria against which existing and proposed personal services and media can be measured. It identifies themes, audiences, audience experiences, and issues. Part 2 describes the mix of services and facilities that are necessary to achieve management goals and interpretive mission. It includes implementation charts that plot a course of action, assign responsibilities, and offer a schedule of activity. When appropriate, Appendices provide more detailed discussions of specific topics. The completed LRIP forms a critical part of the more inclusive Comprehensive Interpretive Plan (CIP).
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Virginia Freshwater Fishing & Watercraft Owner’S Guide
    2014 Virginia Freshwater Fishing & Watercraft Owner’s Guide Free Fishing Days: June 6–8, 2014 National Safe Boating Week: May 17–23, 2014 www.HuntFishVA.com Table of Contents Freshwater Fishing What’s New For 2014................................................5 Fishing License Information and Fees ....................................5 Commonwealth of Virginia Freshwater/Saltwater License Lines on Tidal Waters .........................8 Terry McAuliffe, Governor Reciprocal Licenses .................................................8 General Freshwater Fishing Regulations ..................................9 Department of Game Game/Sport Fish Regulations.........................................11 Creel and Length Limit Tables .......................................12 and Inland Fisheries Trout Fishing Guide ................................................18 Bob Duncan, Executive Director 2014 Catchable Trout Stocking Plan...................................20 Members of the Board Special Regulation Trout Waters .....................................22 Curtis D. Colgate, Chairman, Virginia Beach Fish Consumption Advisories .........................................26 Ben Davenport, Vice-Chairman, Chatham Nongame Fish, Reptile, Amphibian, and Aquatic Invertebrate Regulations........27 David Bernhardt, Arlington Let’s Go Fishing Lisa Caruso, Church Road Fish Identification and Fishing Information ...............................29 Charles H. Cunningham, Fairfax Public Lakes Guide .................................................37 Garry L. Gray,
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia State Parks Economic Impact Report 2018
    VIRGINIA STATE PARKS ECONOMIC IMPACT REPORT 2018 Vincent P. Magnini, Ph.D. Delivered January 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 3 Introduction 4 Methods 6 Direct Impact Measurement 6 Secondary Impact Measurement 7 Visitation Measurement 8 Measuring Economic Activity vs. Impact 8 Results 10 Visitor Spending 11 Economic Activity and Impact 12 Jobs 13 Employment, Labor Income, Value-Added, and Tax Revenues 14 Economic Impacts of Capital Improvement Spending 20 Economic Impacts of Operational Spending 26 Conclusions 27 Investigator Bio 30 References and Endnotes 31 Appendices 33 Appendix A: Map of Virginia State Parks 34 Appendix B: Glossary of Terms 35 Virginia State Parks – 2018 Economic Impact Report Page 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Visitors attracted annually to Virginia’s State Parks trigger a large amount of economic activity throughout the state. This Executive Summary lists the key findings of the 2018 Virginia State Parks economic impact analyses: ➢ In 2018, visitors to Virginia’s State Parks spent an estimated $249.1M in the Commonwealth. Approximately 46% [$113.7M] of this spending was by out-of-state visitors. ➢ The total economic activity stimulated by Virginia State Parks during 2018 was approximately $338.7M. ➢ The total economic impact of Virginia State Parks during 2018 was approximately $267.1M. Economic impact is a measure of “fresh money” infused into the state’s economy that likely would have not been generated in the absence of the park system. ➢ At the individual park level, economic impacts range from $961K to $31.3M (not including parks under development). ➢ In 2018, for every $1 of general tax revenue provided to state parks, $14.06, on average, was generated in fresh money that would not be there if not for the operation of Virginia State Parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Let's Go Camping Guide
    Let’s Go Camping Guide compiled by Amangamek-Wipit Lodge 470 Order of the Arrow National Capital Area Council May 2002 To: All NCAC Unit Leaders From: Amangamek-Wipit Camping Committee Subject: LET'S GO CAMPING GUIDE Date: May 2002 Greetings! This is your copy of the annual Let's Go Camping Guide. The National Capital Area Council Order of the Arrow Amangamek-Wipit Lodge updates this guide annually. This guide is intended to support the unit camping program by providing leaders with a directory of nearby campgrounds. The guide is organized into three sections. Section I lists public campgrounds in Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. Section II covers campgrounds administered by the Boy Scouts of America in Maryland, North Carolina, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia. Section III provides a place for leaders to record their favorite campgrounds for future reference. Many people have provided listings to this year's edition of the guide and we are grateful to all who have contributed. However, this guide is far from a complete listing of the camping resources available to NCAC units. If you would like to add a listing or if you discover a listing in need of correction please contact Philip Caridi at your convenience at [email protected]. Together we can make next year's guide even more useful. Yours in Scouting and Cheerful Service, Chuck Reynolds Lodge Chief Section I: Public Sites Section II: Boys Scouts of America Campgrounds Section III: Personal Favorites Section IV: Baloo Sites Section I: Public Campgrounds National Capital Area Council Let's Go Camping Guide Order of the Arrow May 2002 Amangamek-Wipit, Lodge 470 ST Camp Season Type Capacity Restricts Fires Toilets/Showers Activities/Features Reservations Directions DE Assawoman Wildlife Area flies/mosquitos 20 Take I 495 to Rte 50; 50 E to very bad in late Ocean City; take Rte 1 N to spring, summer, Fenwick Island; DE Rte 54 W early fall year to county Road 381; turn right and follow signs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civilian Conservation Corps and the National Park Service, 1933-1942: an Administrative History. INSTITUTION National Park Service (Dept
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 266 012 SE 046 389 AUTHOR Paige, John C. TITLE The Civilian Conservation Corps and the National Park Service, 1933-1942: An Administrative History. INSTITUTION National Park Service (Dept. of Interior), Washington, D.C. REPORT NO NPS-D-189 PUB DATE 85 NOTE 293p.; Photographs may not reproduce well. PUB TYPE Reports - Descriptive (141) -- Historical Materials (060) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC12 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Conservation (Environment); Employment Programs; *Environmental Education; *Federal Programs; Forestry; Natural Resources; Parks; *Physical Environment; *Resident Camp Programs; Soil Conservation IDENTIFIERS *Civilian Conservation Corps; Environmental Management; *National Park Service ABSTRACT The Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) has been credited as one of Franklin D. Roosevelt's most successful effortsto conserve both the natural and human resources of the nation. This publication provides a review of the program and its impacton resource conservation, environmental management, and education. Chapters give accounts of: (1) the history of the CCC (tracing its origins, establishment, and termination); (2) the National Park Service role (explaining national and state parkprograms and co-operative planning elements); (3) National Park Servicecamps (describing programs and personnel training and education); (4) contributions of the CCC (identifying the major benefits ofthe program in the areas of resource conservation, park and recreational development, and natural and archaeological history finds); and (5) overall
    [Show full text]
  • Targeted Living Shoreline Management Planning for Virginia State Parks in Chesapeake Bay
    Targeted Living Shoreline Management Planning for Virginia State Parks in Chesapeake Bay Summary Report November 2018 Targeted Living Shoreline Management Planning for Virginia State Parks in Chesapeake Bay Summary Report Donna A. Milligan C. Scott Hardaway, Jr. Christine A. Wilcox Shoreline Studies Program Virginia Institute of Marine Science William & Mary This project was funded by the Virginia Coastal Zone Management Program at the Department of Environmental Quality through Grant # NA17NOS4190152 Task 92.02 of the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA, or any of its subagencies. November 2018 Page | 1 1 Introduction The Commonwealth of Virginia owns numerous tidal, waterfront properties along Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries including state parks, natural area preserves, and wildlife management areas. Many of these parks have eroding shorelines and are at risk from coastal hazards such as tidal flooding, waves, and sea level rise. These environmental threats impact the safety of park visitors and the mission of the parks. In an effort to address these issues for the parks as well as provide education to the public on living shoreline management strategies, eleven state parks with tidal shoreline along the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries were selected because of their suitablility for living shoreline demonstration projects (Figure 1). These parks: Belle Isle, Caledon, Chippokes, First Landing, Kiptopeke, Leesylvania, Mason Neck, Middle Peninsula, Westmoreland, Widewater, and York River, are spread throughout the Chesapeake Bay and have a variety of coastal conditions due to their locations and underlying geology.
    [Show full text]
  • Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities
    Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities Alaska Aialik Bay Alaska Highway Alcan Highway Anchorage Arctic Auk Lake Cape Prince of Wales Castle Rock Chilkoot Pass Columbia Glacier Cook Inlet Copper River Cordova Curry Dawson Denali Denali National Park Eagle Fairbanks Five Finger Rapids Gastineau Channel Glacier Bay Glenn Highway Haines Harding Gateway Homer Hoonah Hurricane Gulch Inland Passage Inside Passage Isabel Pass Juneau Katmai National Monument Kenai Kenai Lake Kenai Peninsula Kenai River Kechikan Ketchikan Creek Kodiak Kodiak Island Kotzebue Lake Atlin Lake Bennett Latouche Lynn Canal Matanuska Valley McKinley Park Mendenhall Glacier Miles Canyon Montgomery Mount Blackburn Mount Dewey Mount McKinley Mount McKinley Park Mount O’Neal Mount Sanford Muir Glacier Nome North Slope Noyes Island Nushagak Opelika Palmer Petersburg Pribilof Island Resurrection Bay Richardson Highway Rocy Point St. Michael Sawtooth Mountain Sentinal Island Seward Sitka Sitka National Park Skagway Southeastern Alaska Stikine Rier Sulzer Summit Swift Current Taku Glacier Taku Inlet Taku Lodge Tanana Tanana River Tok Tunnel Mountain Valdez White Pass Whitehorse Wrangell Wrangell Narrow Yukon Yukon River General Views—no specific location Alabama Albany Albertville Alexander City Andalusia Anniston Ashford Athens Attalla Auburn Batesville Bessemer Birmingham Blue Lake Blue Springs Boaz Bobler’s Creek Boyles Brewton Bridgeport Camden Camp Hill Camp Rucker Carbon Hill Castleberry Centerville Centre Chapman Chattahoochee Valley Cheaha State Park Choctaw County
    [Show full text]
  • Mar Business Meeting Set for February 24, 2018 Pcc
    Volume 32, Number 3, January 2018 The MAR Breakdown is the journal of the Mid Appalachian Region of the National Speleological Society. It is MAR BUSINESS MEETING published three times a year; prior to the annual business meeting and SET FOR prior to the Spring and Fall field FEBRUARY 24, 2018 meets. PCC MEETING TO FOLLOW Subscriptions- Event notices and MAR Breakdown newsletters are distributed The Mid Appalachian Region Business electronically. When you attend a Meeting will be held at Mt. Laurel Church of God, field meet, the email address provided on your registration form is Harrisburg, PA on Feb 24, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. added to the distribution list. You may also add yourself to distribution by going to http://eepurl.com/P2f5j You will find additional information and and completing a short registration form. directions on pages 2-3 Meetings and Meets- A meeting of the Pennsylvania Cave The annual business meeting is held the last Saturday in February. Each Conservancy (PCC) will follow the MAR spring and fall there is a field meet. Watch for dates. Business Meeting Chair: Paul Winter State College, PA 16803 (412) 849-6824 [email protected] Vice Chair: J.D. Lewis Bellefonte, PA 16823 (570) 220-4045 [email protected] Secretary: Hope Brooks Inside Page University Park, PA 16802 (443) 510-0312 Details on the 2018 Business Meeting Site 2 [email protected] 2018 Spring MAR Announcement 3 Treasurer: Bette White 2018 Fall MAR Announcement 3 4538 Miller Road MAR Treasurer’s Report 4 Petersburg, PA 16669 MAR Bulletin Sales Report 5 (814) 667-2709 [email protected] The Future of the MAR Bulletin 6 Cave Conservation: Information and Tips for Graffiti Removal 7 Editor: Gretchen “Red” Schock PCC Minutes 9 81 Appalachian Drive PCC Officer Elections 11 Carlisle, PA 17015-8515 (717) 697-3264 2018 Upcoming Events 12 [email protected] MAR Bulletins for Sale 14 Non-copyrighted material may be used by other speleo publications provided credit is given to the MAR Breakdown.
    [Show full text]