DOCSLIB.ORG

Typha Latifolia Infestation and Fish Species Migration in Hadejia Nguru Wetland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Typha Latifolia Infestation and Fish Species Migration in Hadejia Nguru Wetland 150 Typha latifolia Infestation and fish species migration in Hadejia Nguru wetland Birnin- Yauri, Y.A. / Balarabe, M. L. / ------ -- - --- -- -- - Ogunshakin, R. Y./ Enodiana, 0.1. / Aina, E. Abstract The river was divided into two, within each sampling station, Open water and Typha latifolia infested area. The extent of coverageof Typha loti/alia each year were determined using line transect. Experimental gill nets were usedfor the experiment in each location, and the data were collected every three monthsfor the period of two years.The numbers offish caught and their species in the three sampling sites were recorded. Seventy-four dijJerentspecies offish were caught in thefirst year in open water while sixty one different species were caught in Typha latifolia infested area. In the second year seventyfour dijJerentspecies offish were caught whileforty-five different species offish were caught in Typhalatifolia infested area. Typha latifolia proliferation affects all physio-chemical parameters in water. Keywords:Infestation, Typha latifolia.fish migration. Introduction he menace of water weeds especially Typha loti/olio is reaching alarming proportions in many parts of the world in• cluding Nigeria. Water is an important resource, and aquatic weeds affects it adversely by blocking canals and pumps Tof irrigation project, interfering with hydro-electricity production; wasting water in evapotranspiration; hindering boat traffic, increasing water-borne disease, interfering with fishing and fish culture and clogging rivers, lakes and canals so that drainage is impossible and flood result The term aquatic Macrophytes has been used to describe the macroscopic forms of aquatic vegetation and encompasses microalgae e.g the algae cladophora, the stonewort such as charac, the few species of pteriophytes (ferns) adapted to the aquatic habitats and the true angiosperms. Most are rooted, a few species float freely in the water. Their dissimilar origins, extreme plasticity instructure and morphology in relation to changing environmental conditions and very hetcrogonous conditions ofthcir littoral habitat frustrate attempts to classify these groups more precisely. The role of typha latifolia can either be harmful or beneficial. Some of the harmful effects include the reduction offish population (Federal Department of Fisheries, 2006)_ It has also been reported that inter-twine mats of water hyacinth retard water use and cause rapid loss of water through evapotranspiration (Cromchalow and Pongpangan, 2008). They also make it difficult for other plants and animals to live within the environment. They also interfere with irrigation, drainages and hydro• electric power supply systems. However, the economic benefits of Typha loti/olio have received very little attention. Little and Hansen(2000), Boyd(2003) and Boyd and Blaekburn(200 I) reported that many aquatic macrophytes particularly water hyacinth are rich in digestible crude protein(DCP) and arc therefore suitable as animal feed. For instance, Taylor and Robbins (2000) showed that amino composition of proteins of water hyacinth can be used as fish food.Water hyacinth could also be used for the removal of pollutants on water. The need to study aquatic macrophytes is therefore ecologically and economically important The fragile ecosystem however is being threatened by obnoxious aquatic macrophytes. There is urgent need to produce a checklist of the macro• phytes of Hadejia Nguru Wetland and also to identify aquatic weeds that are potentially obnoxious. Though much work has been done in the past, yet there is the need to conduct another survey. PROCEEDINGS OF 28TH FISON ANNUAL CONFERENCE, NOV. 25-30, 2013 Materialsand Methods Thestudywas carried out by dividing the wetland into two: (A) open water,(8) Typha latifolia infested area. Experimental gillnetswere set in each location for the period of two years. The number of fish caught, in (A) and (8) were identified and recorded.Line transect method was used to estimate the extent of coverage of each species of plant. The species of plant was ..... recordedin each one meter from the shoreline to the open water.The plants that cannot be identified in the field were taken totheNational Institute for Freshwater Fisheries Research (NIFFR) herbarium for further identification. The different fish speciescaught were identified in NIFFR fish biology laboratory. 2010 2011 2010 2011 FamilyName Species AB AB FamilyName Species AB AB Dasyatidae Dasyatisgarouaensis + + + Bagrusdocmak + + + + B. filamentosus + + + + Protopteridae Protopterus annectens + + + B. bajad + - + - Po/ypterus ansorgii + + + Claroteslaticeps - Bagridae + + - P. bichirbichir + + + Chrysichthysaluluensis + + + + Po/ypteridae Po/ypterus (e) end/tcheri + + + + C. sauratus + + + + Po/ypterus (s) senega/us + + + + C. nigrodigitatus + + + + Erpetoiochthys ca/abaricus + + + + Auchenoglanisbisculatus + - + - Odaxothrissamento + + Parailiapellucida + + + - C/upeidae Schilbeidae Schilbeintermedius Pellonu/avorax + + + + + + + S. mystus + + + + Osteog/ossidae Heterotis niloticus + + + + Gymnallabestypus - + + + Pantodontidae Pantodon bucho/zi + + Heterobranchusisopterus + - + - Mormyrus rume + + + + C. gariepinus + + + + M. tapirus + + + + Clariidae C. anguillaris + + + + Hippopotamyrus psittacus Mormyridae + + C. jaensis + + + + Campy/omyrus tamandua + + + + C. macromystax + + + + Marcuseninus cyprinoides + + Malapteruruselectricus Malapteruridae + + + + M. senega/ensis + + + + M. minjiriya + + + - Gymnarchidae Gymnarchus ni/oticus + + Chiloglanisbenuensis + + + + Cromeriidae Cromeria ni/otica + + + + Synodontisresupinatus + + + + Hepsetidae Hepsetidaeodoe + + S. budgetti + + + + S. ctarias Hydrocynus brevis + + + Mochokidae + + + + H. vitlatus + + + + S.omias + + + - S. robbianus H. forskalii + + + + + + + Characidae S. nigrita + + + + A/estes dentex + + + + S. schall + + + - 8rycinus /euciscus + + + + Parachannaafricana + + + - Micra/estes e/ongatus + Channidae + + + P.obscura + + + + Phag%ricatus + Distichodontidae + + + Latesnitoticus + + + + Distichodus engycepha/us + + + + Chromidatilapia(g)gunther + + + + Citharidium ansorgii + + + + Centropomidae Tilapiadageti + + + + Citharinidae Citharinus latus + + + + T.zilli + - + - C. citharus + + + + T.guineensis + - + - Che/aethiopsbibie + + + Ctenopomanebulosum + + + - Labeo coubie + + + Ctenopomamuriei + + + + Cyprinidae Anabantidae L. senega/ensis + + C. patherici + + + + Barbusbynnioccidentalis + + + + Caecomastacembelus cryptacanthus + + + - Tetraodontidae Tetraodonpustulatus + + + + Source: Eiekt survey 2010/2011 Results Theresults offish caught in open water and T latifolla infested area are presented in table I. The percentage coverage of T latifot!« infestation and other weed species for the two years are presented in figure I and 2. The results were statistically analyzedand the analysis shows a significant difference between the fish caught in open water and T latifolia infested area, so also between T latifolia infestation in the first and second year (p>O.05). Percentage Coverage of Each Spedes Percentaee covel'illeof each species .OpcnWJlttf .0tH" WOI~' • Typha Ior'lo'~ • Typha IiUttolJa • pciyvonum IPP, • Jp<>m~o OQlloti< • polYiooum sPp. a/uclgwi91o fr~Clo • lpomota aQuatk • Cl!ftophylium spp, .cypr"'sspp • Nymph~Joh.rS .MImOSQ~ro • P!stlOun::llJot .CY~ISpp •Cclt.noochlooCDlono, II cchmoocNoostOQIlHto • L.ef¥$JQ htXOlldro SOLIree: Field Survey (2013), Source: Field Survey (2013). Fig. 1: The percentage coverage of each species in 2010. Fig. 2: The percentage coverage of each species in 2011. 151 PROCEEDINGS OF 28TH ANNUALCONFERENCE, NOV. 25-30, 2013 Discussion Seventy-four different fish species belonging to twenty-three families were caught in open water in the first year while thirteen species of them were absent in Typha latifolia infested area. In the second year, seventy-four different species were caught in the open water while twenty-nine species of them were absent in Typha latifolia-infested area. We can conclude from this V> study that Typha latifolia infested area has less fish species than the open water. The migration of those absent fish species tt:1 can be associated with oxygen (D02) depletion in Typha latifolia infested area.Goodman (2010) stated that depletion in 002 ~ results in fish mortality. This is also in line with Smit (2009) findings that Typha australis infestation leads to total migration ;; of fish species if not controlled. However the family Clariidae was observed to survive in Typha spp infested area compared o to other species. Z s:: Recommendation tt:1 ~ There should be additional support for research in key areas of aquatic Botany, this will generate new fundamental knowl- :> edge and advanced technologies for developing and improving management and control of aquatic macrophytes species, for t-< "0 improved fisheries and expanding biological processes in aquatic ecosystem and their role in global change. o e- t-< c::: ....o-j REFERENCES o Olaosebikan, B.D. and Aminu, R. (1998). Field guide /0 Nigeria freshwater fishes. z Federal Department of Fisheries (2006). Management guide for lakes and reservoirs in Nigeria. S<? o-j Cromchalow and Pongpangan (2008). Influence of potassium source (sediment vs. open water) and sediment composition on the growth o and nutrition of a submersed aquatic macrophytes (lfydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle). Aquatic Botany, 15:91-103. :><...... o Little and Hansen (2000). Boyd (2003) and Boyd and Blackburn (2001) Biomass techniques for monitoring and assessing control of o aquatic vegetation, Lake and Reservoir Management, 7: 141-154. t-< o Taylor and Robbins (2000). Application of aquatic vegetation identification, documentation and mapping in Eurasian water mil foil G) >< control projects. Lake and Reservoir Management, 7: 185-196. Smith, w.L. (2009). Experimental design and analysis in field studies of aquatic vegetation. Lake and Reservoir Management, 7: 165-174. Goodman (2009). Relationship between physiological parameter and fish species. International Journal of Aquatic Science. 1: 120-125. 152.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phylogenetic Relationships Within the Speciose Family Characidae
    Oliveira et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2011, 11:275 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/11/275 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Phylogenetic relationships within the speciose family Characidae (Teleostei: Ostariophysi: Characiformes) based on multilocus analysis and extensive ingroup sampling Claudio Oliveira1*, Gleisy S Avelino1, Kelly T Abe1, Tatiane C Mariguela1, Ricardo C Benine1, Guillermo Ortí2, Richard P Vari3 and Ricardo M Corrêa e Castro4 Abstract Background: With nearly 1,100 species, the fish family Characidae represents more than half of the species of Characiformes, and is a key component of Neotropical freshwater ecosystems. The composition, phylogeny, and classification of Characidae is currently uncertain, despite significant efforts based on analysis of morphological and molecular data. No consensus about the monophyly of this group or its position within the order Characiformes has been reached, challenged by the fact that many key studies to date have non-overlapping taxonomic representation and focus only on subsets of this diversity. Results: In the present study we propose a new definition of the family Characidae and a hypothesis of relationships for the Characiformes based on phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences of two mitochondrial and three nuclear genes (4,680 base pairs). The sequences were obtained from 211 samples representing 166 genera distributed among all 18 recognized families in the order Characiformes, all 14 recognized subfamilies in the Characidae, plus 56 of the genera so far considered incertae sedis in the Characidae. The phylogeny obtained is robust, with most lineages significantly supported by posterior probabilities in Bayesian analysis, and high bootstrap values from maximum likelihood and parsimony analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Barcoding Discriminates Freshwater Fishes from Southeastern Nigeria and Provides River System-Level Phylogeographic Resoluti
    Mitochondrial DNA, 2011; Early Online: 1–9 DNA barcoding discriminates freshwater fishes from southeastern Nigeria and provides river system-level phylogeographic resolution within some species CHRISTOPHER D. NWANIa, SVEN BECKERb, HEATHER E. BRAIDb, EMMANUEL F. UDEc, OKECHUKWU I. OKOGWUa, & ROBERT HANNERb aDepartment of Applied Biology, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria, bDepartment of Integrative Biology, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, and cFisheries and Aquaculture, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria (Received 17 August 2010; revised 28 October 2010; accepted 28 October 2010) Abstract Background and aims: Fishes are the main animal protein source for human beings and play a vital role in aquatic ecosystems and food webs. Fish identification can be challenging, especially in the tropics (due to high diversity), and this is particularly true for larval forms or fragmentary remains. DNA barcoding, which uses the 50 region of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (cox1) as a target gene, is an efficient method for standardized species-level identification for biodiversity assessment and conservation, pending the establishment of reference sequence libraries. Materials and methods: In this study, fishes were collected from three rivers in southeastern Nigeria, identified morphologically, and imaged digitally. DNA was extracted, PCR-amplified, and the standard barcode region was bidirectionally sequenced for 363 individuals belonging to 70 species in 38 genera. All specimen provenance data and associated sequence information were For personal use only. recorded in the barcode of life data systems (BOLD; www.barcodinglife.org). Analytical tools on BOLD were used to assess the performance of barcoding to identify species. Results: Using neighbor-joining distance comparison, the average genetic distance was 60-fold higher between species than within species, as pairwise genetic distance estimates averaged 10.29% among congeners and only 0.17% among conspecifics.
    [Show full text]
  • Citharinus Citharus in Anambra River Flood System, Southeastern Nigeria
    American Journal of Agricultural Science 2015; 2(2): 63-69 Published online April 10, 2015 (http://www.aascit.org/journal/ajas) Gut Helminth Parasites of Citharinus citharus in Anambra River Flood System, Southeastern Nigeria Uneke Bilikis Iyabo Fisheries and Hydrobiology, Dept of Applied Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria Email address [email protected] Citation Keywords Uneke Bilikis Iyabo. Gut Helminth Parasites of Citharinus citharus in Anambra River Flood Citharinus citharus , System, Southeastern Nigeria. American Journal of Agricultural Science. Prevalence, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2015, pp. 63-69. Gut Helminth Parasites, Procamallanus Laeviconchus, Abstract Cithariniella citharini , A total of forty (40) Citharinus citharus (Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1809), order Infection Rate, (Characiformes) and family (Citharinidae) were purchased randomly from local Nigeria fishermen who fished in Anambra River from May to October 2012 and examined for the gut helminth parasites. Macroscopic and microscopic examinations were used for parasite isolation and identification. Ten (25.0%) of the fish examined were infected with the two species of helminth parasites Procamallanus laeviconchus and Cithariniella Received: March 19, 2015 citharini . The parasites were isolated which were restricted to the intestine, except for P. Revised: March 30, 2015 laeviconchus , which was also found in the oesophagus and stomach. P. laeviconchus was Accepted: March 31, 2015 identified in the majority of the fish with a prevalence rate of 15.0% while C. citharini was identified in the minority with an infection rate of 10.0%. The highest prevalence (30.0%) of the helminth infection was recorded in fish with total lengths ranging from 35cm-39.9cm while those with lengths ranging from 20cm-24.9cm recorded the lowest prevalence (11.7%).
    [Show full text]
  • 22 . Cltharlnldae
    22 . ClTHARlNlDAE Jean-Pierre GOSSE La famille des Citharinidae est voisine de celle des Distichodontidae. Elle comprend des Poissons de grande taille au corps haut et comprimé latéralement. CLÉ DES GENRES 1 - Ecailles cténoïdes ; corps marqué de deux larges bandes transversales noires ................ .................................................................................................................. Citharidium - Ecailles cycloïdes ......................................................................................................... 2 2 - Ecailles grandes ; 50 a 56 écailles en ligne longitudinale ; 7 à 8 entre la ligne latérale et la base des ventrales .................................................................................... Cifharinops - Ecailles petites ; plus de 60 écailles en ligne longitudinale ; plus de 12 entre la ligne latérale et la base des ventrales ..................................................................... Citharinus KEY TO THE GENERA 1 - Scales strongly denticulate ; two large oblique blackish bands across the sides ................ .................................................................................................................. Citharidium - Scales cycloid ............................................................................................................. 2 2 - Scales large ; 50 to 56 in longitudinal line ; 7 to 8 between lateral line and ventral fin ............. ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution and Ecology in Widespread Acoustic Signaling Behavior Across Fishes
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.14.296335; this version posted September 14, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Evolution and Ecology in Widespread Acoustic Signaling Behavior Across Fishes 2 Aaron N. Rice1*, Stacy C. Farina2, Andrea J. Makowski3, Ingrid M. Kaatz4, Philip S. Lobel5, 3 William E. Bemis6, Andrew H. Bass3* 4 5 1. Center for Conservation Bioacoustics, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, 159 6 Sapsucker Woods Road, Ithaca, NY, USA 7 2. Department of Biology, Howard University, 415 College St NW, Washington, DC, USA 8 3. Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, 215 Tower Road, Ithaca, NY 9 USA 10 4. Stamford, CT, USA 11 5. Department of Biology, Boston University, 5 Cummington Street, Boston, MA, USA 12 6. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Cornell University Museum of 13 Vertebrates, Cornell University, 215 Tower Road, Ithaca, NY, USA 14 15 ORCID Numbers: 16 ANR: 0000-0002-8598-9705 17 SCF: 0000-0003-2479-1268 18 WEB: 0000-0002-5669-2793 19 AHB: 0000-0002-0182-6715 20 21 *Authors for Correspondence 22 ANR: [email protected]; AHB: [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.14.296335; this version posted September 14, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Families of Oguta Lake, South Eastern Nigeria, and Sustainability Issues
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE): E-Journals Journal of Natural Sciences Research www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-3186 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0921 (Online) Vol.4, No.9, 2014 Fish Families of Oguta Lake, South Eastern Nigeria, and Sustainability Issues Amiye Francis 1; Francis David Sikoki 2 and Uchenna Nwabata Agorua 3 1. Dept of Animal Science & Fisheries. Faculty of Agriculture,Univ of Port Harcourt (Uniportt) 2.Dept of Animal and Environmental Biology. Uniport 3.Dept of Fisheries & Marine, Fac of Agric., Imo State Polytechnic, Umuagwo *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Fish species of Oguta Lake were sampled for seven months to acertain present status. The catch consisted of 5 orders, 15 families, 21 genera and 28 species. Bagridae, Characidae, Anabantidae, Citharinidae and Notopteridae were dominant families in terms of numbers; in terms of species, Cichlidae was most dominant ( 5 species). In descending order number of species identified were: three each, for Mormyridae, Characidae and Mochokidae; and a species or two for each of the remaining 11 families, indicating that there could be high risk of complete wipe out of such families under sudden adverse environmental conditions. As a potential source of socio-economic development to surrounding communities the anthropogenic activities on this lake should be defined in order to forestall the gradual and continuous loss of its useful services. The root crop cassava (Manihot sp.) cottage industry can be sited by the lake to stop its direct processing within the lake. Domestic waste should not be dumped directly into the lake as well.
    [Show full text]
  • HANDBOOK of FISH BIOLOGY and FISHERIES Volume 1 Also Available from Blackwell Publishing: Handbook of Fish Biology and Fisheries Edited by Paul J.B
    HANDBOOK OF FISH BIOLOGY AND FISHERIES Volume 1 Also available from Blackwell Publishing: Handbook of Fish Biology and Fisheries Edited by Paul J.B. Hart and John D. Reynolds Volume 2 Fisheries Handbook of Fish Biology and Fisheries VOLUME 1 FISH BIOLOGY EDITED BY Paul J.B. Hart Department of Biology University of Leicester AND John D. Reynolds School of Biological Sciences University of East Anglia © 2002 by Blackwell Science Ltd a Blackwell Publishing company Chapter 8 © British Crown copyright, 1999 BLACKWELL PUBLISHING 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148‐5020, USA 108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JF, UK 550 Swanston Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia The right of Paul J.B. Hart and John D. Reynolds to be identified as the Authors of the Editorial Material in this Work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher. First published 2002 Reprinted 2004 Library of Congress Cataloging‐in‐Publication Data has been applied for. Volume 1 ISBN 0‐632‐05412‐3 (hbk) Volume 2 ISBN 0‐632‐06482‐X (hbk) 2‐volume set ISBN 0‐632‐06483‐8 A catalogue record for this title is available from the British Library. Set in 9/11.5 pt Trump Mediaeval by SNP Best‐set Typesetter Ltd, Hong Kong Printed and bound in the United Kingdom by TJ International Ltd, Padstow, Cornwall.
    [Show full text]
  • Ichthyofauna Diversity of Lake Asejire: Ecological Implications
    Vol. 5(10), pp. 248-252, Oct, 2013 International Journal of Fisheries and DOI: 10.5897/IJFA13.0379 ISSN 1991-637X©2013 Academic Journals Aquaculture http://www.academicjournals.org/IJFA Full length Research paper Ichthyofauna diversity of Lake Asejire: Ecological implications Ipinmoroti, Mabel Omowumi Department of Renewable Resources, College of Agricultural Science, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago–Iwoye, Ogun State, Nigeria. Accepted 19 August, 2013 The natural diversity of most aquatic systems has witnessed various changes in stock diversity and abundance resulting from structural changes in habitat, food composition and uncontrolled exploitation. These have altered the ecology of the fish resources with the disappearance of some species and dominance of others. This study seeks to identify the ecological implication of the stock diversity and abundance in Lake Asejire. Lake Asejire is a 525 ha man-made lake on river Osun one of the major rivers that drain the western part of Nigeria. Fish samples were collected for a period of 24 months using gillnets of between 25 and 187.5 mm mesh sizes. Data obtained were analyzed using inferential statistics and descriptive analysis of means, frequencies and percentages. Seventeen families identified and grouped into trophic levels. Herbivores were 63.03 and 60.35%; carnivore 31.05 and 30.65% and omnivores were 5.91 and 8.99% by biomass in the first and second year respectively. The herbivores were dominated by the cichlids, heterotis and cyprinids; carnivores by bagrids, characids, channids and Lates while mormyrids, synodonts and clarids constitute the omnivores. Seasons had no effect on the population and number of the carnivores.
    [Show full text]
  • Citharinidae Günther, 1864 - Lutefishes [=Cyprinosalmi, Citharinina] Notes: Cyprinosalmi Latreille, 1825:120 [Ref
    FAMILY Citharinidae Günther, 1864 - lutefishes [=Cyprinosalmi, Citharinina] Notes: Cyprinosalmi Latreille, 1825:120 [ref. 31889] (tribe) Citharinus [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Citharinina Günther, 1864:279, 302 [ref. 1974] (group) Citharinus GENUS Citharidium Boulenger, 1902 - lutefishes [=Citharidium Boulenger [G. A.], 1902:144] Notes: [ref. 563]. Neut. Citharidium ansorgii Boulenger, 1902. Type by monotypy. •Valid as Citharidium Boulenger, 1902 -- (Géry 1977:58 [ref. 1597], Vari 1979:339 [ref. 5490], Daget 1984:212 [ref. 6170], Gosse in Lévêque et al. 1990:262 [ref. 21589], Poll & Gosse 1995:99 [ref. 24781]). Current status: Valid as Citharidium Boulenger, 1902. Citharinidae. Species Citharidium ansorgii Boulenger, 1902 - Nigerian lutefish (author) [=Citharidium ansorgii Boulenger [G. A.], 1902:144, Pl. 3] Notes: [Annals and Magazine of Natural History (Series 7) v. 9 (no. 50); ref. 563] Lake Oguta, southern Nigeria. Current status: Valid as Citharidium ansorgii Boulenger, 1902. Citharinidae. Distribution: Habitat: freshwater. GENUS Citharinops Daget, 1962 - lutefishes [=Citharinops (subgenus of Citharinus) Daget [J.], 1962:81, 101] Notes: [ref. 1024]. Masc. Citharinus distichodoides Pellegrin, 1919. Type by monotypy. See also Daget & Iltis 1965:83 (footnote) [ref. 13626]. •Valid as Citharinops Daget, 1962 -- (Daget 1984:212 [ref. 6170], Gosse in Lévêque et al. 1990:262 [ref. 21589], Poll & Gosse 1995:99 [ref. 24781], Dankwa et al. 1999:24 [ref. 28023]). Current status: Valid as Citharinops Daget, 1962. Citharinidae. Species Citharinops distichodoides (Pellegrin, 1919) - Gribingui lutefish (author) [=Citharinus distichodoides Pellegrin [J.], 1919:208, Citharinus thomasi Pellegrin [J.], 1924:461] Notes: [Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France v. 44; ref. 15224] Gribingui River, Congo.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the World
    Fishes of the World Fishes of the World Fifth Edition Joseph S. Nelson Terry C. Grande Mark V. H. Wilson Cover image: Mark V. H. Wilson Cover design: Wiley This book is printed on acid-free paper. Copyright © 2016 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. Published simultaneously in Canada. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 646-8600, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at www.wiley.com/go/permissions. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with the respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be createdor extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 3: Fishery Composition of the Study Area
    Table 3: Fishery composition of the study area S/N Family Common Name Local name (Ogbia) Scientific Name Relative Habitat Fishing areas Peak Period Fishing gear Abundance 1 Anabantidae Tailspot ctenopoma Okolokolo Ctenopoma kingsleyae Common Pelagic Elabio creek August to March fish fence, (Guther,1896) Hook and line 2 Esa Auchenaglanis bicutatus (G. Common Demersal Elabio creek August to March fish fence, Bagridae St. Hilaire,1809) Hook and line 3 Esa Auchenaglanis occidentalis Common Demersal Eferiwo river, August to March Gill net, Cast (Val., 1840 Otuoke river, net Bagridae ) Otuaba river, Abaye water side 4 Bayad Esa Common Demersal Eferiwo river, May to November Gill net, Cast Otuoke river, net Bagridae Bagrus bajad (Forskal,1775) Otuaba river, Abaye water side 5 Esa Common Benthopelagic Eferiwo river, May to November Gill net, Cast Otuoke river, net Bagrus docmak Bagridae Otuaba river, (Forskal,1775) Abaye water side 6 Esa Common Benthopelagic Eferiwo river, May to November Gill net, Cast Otuoke river, net Chrysichthys auratus (G. St. Bagridae Otuaba river, Hilaire,1809) Abaye water side 7 Bagrid catfish Common Benthopelagic Eferiwo river, May to November Gill net, Cast Otuoke river, net Chrysichthys nigrodigitatus Bagridae Otuaba river, (Lacepede, 1803) Abaye water side 8 Widehead catfish Common Benthopelagic Eferiwo river, May to November Gill net, Cast Otuoke river, net Clarotes laticeps Bagridae Otuaba river, (Rupell,1829) Abaye water side 9 Snake-head fish Obolo Parachanna africana Common Demersal Elabio creek May to November
    [Show full text]
  • Subsistence Fish Farming in Africa: a Technical Manual
    ACF INTERNATIONAL Subsistence fish farming in Africa: a technical manual Yves FERMON In collaboration with: Aımara Cover photos: Ö Top right: Tilapia zillii - © Anton Lamboj Ö Top left: Pond built by ACF in DRC, 2008 - © François Charrier Ö Bottom: Beneficiaries in front of the pond they have built. Liberia, ASUR, 2006 - © Yves Fermon ii Subsistence fishfarming in Africa Subsistence fishfarming in Africa OBJECTIVES OF THE MANUAL Ö The objective of this manual is to explain how to build facilities that produce ani- mal protein — fish — using minimal natural resources and minimal external supplies. These fish are being produced for the purpose of subsistence. Ö It is possible to produce edible fish in a short time and at a low cost in order to to compensate for a lack of animal protein available in a community and to do so sustai- nably. However, facilities must be adapted to the environmental context. This manual is a guide for: ¾ Program managers and their technical teams; ¾ Managers at headquarters who are monitoring program success. This manual covers: Ö The different stages of starting of a «fish farming» program As soon as teams arrive on the ground, they must evaluate the resources available, the needs of the population, and existing supplies. This assessment is followed by the technical work of ins- talling fish ponds. When this is done, the next stage is to manage and monitor the ponds and the production of fish. Ö Constraints on field workers The determination of whether fish farming is appropriate in a particular location and if so, of which type, will depend upon many environmental variables.
    [Show full text]